Hey! You should know that Samsung has released a newer version of this product: the Samsung WB700.
Samsung HZ35W:
Hands On Review
Samsung's zoomer is stuffed with tech, including a GPS unit and AMOLED scene. Do the bells and whistles justify the cost?
By Liam McCabe
- HZ35W Big Picture
- User comments
Last updated on 01/18/2013
The world has too many point-and-shoot cameras. On top of the dozens of
cameras that came out this spring, readers still ask about cheap
cameras that came out three years ago. Honestly, I have no recollection
of Generic XYZ123 with the 3x zoom that cost $180 at Amazon back in
2006. I probably know something about the updated version that came out
last year, but unless I compare the specs side-by-side, I couldn't
describe the difference. They're probably almost the same, anyway.
Full manual control is a
very desirable feature and it is well-executed on this camera. The average
sensor and slow lens really aren't equipped to handle low-light
situations particularly well, and auto modes don't . Here, users can
tinker a bit more and find some middle ground between max-ISO
noise-fests, blurry messes, and pitch-black non-pictures. I shot with
the HZ35W in a particularly challenging environment: a three-day heavy
metal festival in Baltimore -- and I managed to snap some decent indoor
and nighttime shots, thanks largely to the shutter priority mode.
Outdoors
on a sunny day, the HZ35W produces some decent images. Colors seem
natural, details are reasonably well preserved, and everything is in focus, even
at full zoom, thanks to the image stabilization. Even indoors, when
there's decent lighting, the shots come out well as long as the ISO
setting stays at 400 or below. In low-light, it runs into the same
noise problems that most point-and-shoots do.
That
said, I'm hard pressed to think of many circumstances where this
feature could really be useful. Hikers, wanderers, and long-distance
travelers in general could use it to plot an exact course of their
adventures, complete with pictures. It's pretty cool in that regard, so
if that idea really turns your wheels, you might be the kind of person
that the HZ35W is designed for. Just remember: you're paying $350 for a
$250 camera with a GPS unit attached to it.
So cheers to Samsung for building cameras that I'll still be able to remember at next year's Consumer Electronics Show. They've given us the DualView series, odometer-style displays, WiFi capability, and now, GPS capability. Buyers can find these features in other brands, but the designers at Samsung really go that extra mile to add the "gadget" vibe to their cameras. That said, it's just important to accept that when you buy a tricked-out Samsung, you pay extra for the wow factor, not the image quality.
For consideration today, we have the HZ35W, a typically atypical Samsung camera. Its feature set is stacked even by Samsung standards: 15x optical zoom, ultra-wide 24mm lens, GPS for geotagging and basic navigation, 720p HD video, and a 3-inch AMOLED display. But as we've come to expect, the image quality falls short of what we'd hope for from a $350 camera. We can't get everything we want, but there might be a niche crowd that gets everything they need.
Build Quality
It feels average to me now, but I thought Samsung sent me a brick the first time I picked up the box. The HZ35W is a big boy as far as compact cameras go. It's roughly the size of my BlackBerry Tour, though a little shorter, and about twice as thick. The significant size contributes to a comfortable in-hand feel, and I never felt fatigued from holding it up for too long, though I think the heft may have contributed to the camera shake I experienced at the full, 15x zoom.The straightforward button layout includes a mode dial, dedicated video button, zoom tilter around the shutter, and a toggle for the GPS function (more on that later). The minimalist backside sports a standard d-pad, menu, playback, and function buttons, as well as a dedicated video button. There are mini-USB and mini-HDMI outputs under a flap on the right-hand side, and a battery and SD card compartment down below. It's all tied together by a big, bright, 3-inch AMOLED screen. This monitor is one advantage that higher-end Samsung cameras have over the competition; AMOLED monitors are more efficient than LCDs, so the battery life should be longer, and they're also much easier to see in the sunlight.
Performance and User Experience
The HZ35W is no beginner's camera, so expect a little bit of learning curve as you navigate some of the advanced settings in the menu system. Experienced users will appreciate aperture priority, shutter priority, and full manual modes, and novices should recognize more basic adjustments like ISO, white balance, and exposure compensation. There's room to grow with this camera.
Full manual control is a
very desirable feature and it is well-executed on this camera. The average
sensor and slow lens really aren't equipped to handle low-light
situations particularly well, and auto modes don't . Here, users can
tinker a bit more and find some middle ground between max-ISO
noise-fests, blurry messes, and pitch-black non-pictures. I shot with
the HZ35W in a particularly challenging environment: a three-day heavy
metal festival in Baltimore -- and I managed to snap some decent indoor
and nighttime shots, thanks largely to the shutter priority mode.Videos look decent -- high definition, but a little fuzzy thanks to the motion JPEG format. Optical zoom works during filming, which is a plus. Unfortunately, I ran into some problems with sound. Watching playback of some videos, the sound often cuts out for no apparent reason. I originally thought that maybe the sound automatically cuts while the zoom is extended or retracting to avoid motor noise, but after watching again and again, it seems like it was a random occurrence. I haven't read any other reports of this, so it's possible I had a faulty model.
Image Quality
Outdoors
on a sunny day, the HZ35W produces some decent images. Colors seem
natural, details are reasonably well preserved, and everything is in focus, even
at full zoom, thanks to the image stabilization. Even indoors, when
there's decent lighting, the shots come out well as long as the ISO
setting stays at 400 or below. In low-light, it runs into the same
noise problems that most point-and-shoots do. As I mentioned above, the full manual controls can help get usable shots in these tough situations. But trying to shoot dim scenes in any automatic mode is as frustrating as with any point-and-shoot half its price. The sensor just isn't equipped to deal with these situations. I realize it may not be a fair comparison, since the HZ35W is packed to the gills with flashy features, but $350 buys a Canon S90, which has great image quality and crushes in low light. Just sayin'.
GPS
Before I get going on the GPS function, let's consider the Samsung HZ30W, the little brother to the HZ35W. It's the same camera, but without the AMOLED screen and GPS unit. It goes for about $270, though you can easily find it for $240. Same 15x zoom, same 24mm lens, same HD video, same image quality, all for $100 cheaper than the HZ35W. So we can agree that the extra cost of the HZ35W goes toward purely superficial features: the AMOLED screen and the GPS unit.The monitor is nice, no doubt, but for most users the GPS feature is not worth the money. First of all, it only works outdoors. That's to be expected, as anyone who has used a Garmin or TomTom navigation device knows. But that still renders it useless whenever you're indoors, whether that's where you do 20 percent or 90 percent of your shooting. If you want to use the geotagging capabilities to retrace your steps after a night of barhopping or a day of bouncing from museum to museum in a new city, you're out of luck.
Outdoors, the performance was OK, I guess; I haven't tried either of the other GPS cameras this year (the Panasonic ZS7 or Sony HX5V) so I don't have a reference point for how a system like this should perform. It did take about 15 minutes to acquire a signal the first time I used it. Once it works, it's pretty accurate. It always displayed the right location, and my images were tagged to (I think) the correct locations on the map view.
That
said, I'm hard pressed to think of many circumstances where this
feature could really be useful. Hikers, wanderers, and long-distance
travelers in general could use it to plot an exact course of their
adventures, complete with pictures. It's pretty cool in that regard, so
if that idea really turns your wheels, you might be the kind of person
that the HZ35W is designed for. Just remember: you're paying $350 for a
$250 camera with a GPS unit attached to it. And one more gripe: You'll need to download map information from Samsung and add it onto your SD card to get the GPS function to work. It's available at Samsung's website, but the directions to make it work aren't particularly clear. Samsung actually shipped an SD card to me with preloaded map info before I even figured it out, so best of luck to those of you who have to figure it out on your own. Come on back and leave a comment to help your fellow users.
Bottom Line
In terms of picture and image quality, the HZ35W performs like a significantly cheaper camera. The HZ30W is that significantly cheaper camera. I'm willing to bet that GPS capability won't matter to about 80 percent of anybody who reads this, so in that case, the HZ30W is definitely the way to go. If you're one of that extremely niche group who wants to overpay for a regular big-zoomer because it has GPS, take a look at the Panasonic ZS7 and Sony HX5V first. If you decide to go with the HZ35W, don't get all upset when your pictures come out looking average.Update: A few days after we published this review, a few retailers began selling this model for $250, a full $100 cheaper than the average cost when this was written. Now that's a deal. It looks like that was a limited-time offer, as the HZ35W is back up to $350. Hopefully it will fall again, because it's a fine camera that's unfortunately over-priced.
Similar Products
Samsung HZ35W Comments & Questions (write your own!)
Pete (02/13/2011)
Phat - looking forward to seeing this!
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (02/14/2011)
It's already been out and was discontinued due to some serious problems with the GPS unit.
reply to this comment
is it possible to know (So Close — 11/27/2010)
so when it comes down to the Samsung HZ30W or the Pansasonic ZS6 or the canon SX130 is are you going to see any Noticeably difference when Printing primarily outdoor "scenic" pictures at all times of the day and year. up to 12"x18" to 8"x10" prints. or indoor prints up to 8"x12"??
the Samsung cost $149.990$199.99 the Canon $179.99 the Panasonic $210-$260 Does the Canon SX130 take noticeably better pictures/prints than the SX120 that has less MP and "narrower wide lens"?
reply to this comment
the Samsung cost $149.990$199.99 the Canon $179.99 the Panasonic $210-$260 Does the Canon SX130 take noticeably better pictures/prints than the SX120 that has less MP and "narrower wide lens"?
by James DeRuvo (11/30/2010)
You may see a difference in contrast, but noticeably? I rather doubt you'll see it in 95% of your images.
reply to this comment
Does panasonic produces blurrier/"worse" pics than samsung? (Burning Out — 11/10/2010)
QUESTION
Am I to tired, or is it just my imagination?...
But does the Pansaonic ZS7 in the sample pics seam to take much more soft focus/blurry/out of focus picture All Around the Edges of the sample pictures. than the Samsung HZ35W Does???
I am actually interested in the Panasonic ZS6 (at $229.99 on sale {$40 off?}) and then Samsung HZ30W ($199.99) But for the sake of reviews I have to look at the ZS7 and the HZ35W.
Which camera will actually produce Better pictures/PRINTS?
11"X16” or bigger/smaller… I was going to buy the Panasonic ZS6 (from Costco) over the Samsung HZ30w but now I’m not sure.
Which in the real world is the better camera?
Any Thoughts on comparing their picture printing quality to the Canon. SX130 IS, or the Fuji S2800 or S1800?
Beyond picture producing quality. are any of these cameras less reliable then the others?
I kept Reading how the Panasonic is supposed to be Noticeably Better than the Samsung, But looking at the pictures now. I’m not so sure.
I want to take and print good,(great ;-) ) outdoor scenery pics in a Wide Range of Lighting Conditions. I like macro too, and I want the ZOOM ( AROUND 300mm Equivalent?) and wide angle to. Outdoor “scenery/life” shots are the most important. sure good indoor shots and video would be nice too…
For some reason I am finding the Over Priced Panasonic proprietary battery “Requirement” Offensive and annoying. IF I get that camera, has anyone found a good after market battery for it? Ultralast batteries?
The closer I study these things. the more confused I get… Definitely need sleep, and not the computer.
Thank you for your assistance.
reply to this comment
Am I to tired, or is it just my imagination?...
But does the Pansaonic ZS7 in the sample pics seam to take much more soft focus/blurry/out of focus picture All Around the Edges of the sample pictures. than the Samsung HZ35W Does???
I am actually interested in the Panasonic ZS6 (at $229.99 on sale {$40 off?}) and then Samsung HZ30W ($199.99) But for the sake of reviews I have to look at the ZS7 and the HZ35W.
Which camera will actually produce Better pictures/PRINTS?
11"X16” or bigger/smaller… I was going to buy the Panasonic ZS6 (from Costco) over the Samsung HZ30w but now I’m not sure.
Which in the real world is the better camera?
Any Thoughts on comparing their picture printing quality to the Canon. SX130 IS, or the Fuji S2800 or S1800?
Beyond picture producing quality. are any of these cameras less reliable then the others?
I kept Reading how the Panasonic is supposed to be Noticeably Better than the Samsung, But looking at the pictures now. I’m not so sure.
I want to take and print good,(great ;-) ) outdoor scenery pics in a Wide Range of Lighting Conditions. I like macro too, and I want the ZOOM ( AROUND 300mm Equivalent?) and wide angle to. Outdoor “scenery/life” shots are the most important. sure good indoor shots and video would be nice too…
For some reason I am finding the Over Priced Panasonic proprietary battery “Requirement” Offensive and annoying. IF I get that camera, has anyone found a good after market battery for it? Ultralast batteries?
The closer I study these things. the more confused I get… Definitely need sleep, and not the computer.
Thank you for your assistance.
Point and shoot printable picture quality confusion. (Yep still baffles by new cameras just sitting on store shelves. — 11/04/2010)
What do you think about those 'TOUGH/WATERPROOF cameras from Pentax and Olympus? Will they produce good quality "scenic" pictures to blow up. Do they have enough zoom for the outdoors? ( liked not having to worry about falling into a creek with my Pentax IQ 90 WR , but not enough zoom.)
and the prospect of being able to take shots and "film" while snorkeling is intriguing. but I can't do much of that around here, or should I say essential No snorkeling around here. :-(
Do you know if there are any really "Still Photo Quality" Differences between the PANASONIC ZS6 , ZS7 or ZS 5? Besides the Global positioning, are there any real differences? Do some have screens that are visible when you are out in full bright sun, and others that are not? How about the ZS1? ( I saw one for $119.99) Any reason to get one over the other? considering the ZS 6 is available "on sale" for $229.99 right now.( i think if not $249 or $279?)
Fuji S2800 $199.00
Canon EX130 is sometimes $229.99
Samsung HZ30W $199.99
Any reasons to get one over the other, or Not to get one?
( like to try and keep the cost under $200 ( but I would I guess I might pay $20 or so dollars more if it is going to get me noticeably better shots/ prints, or a noticeably better camera.) I don't have money to "burn" and I get nervous Taking cameras out doors hiking to get potentially damaged or lost. I would Freak out If I accidentally broke or lost a $300 or more camera while backpacking. And I don’t have the space, or time to mess with extra hassle of SLR, and the weight.. Hmmm but those rugged water proof things... :-? OR are those waterproof cams just and Extra expense for noticeable lower quality pictures? and limited/not useful zoom? in a camera that you wont break... Do you think that the Olympus rugged, or the pentax water proof cameras would produce, Good enough prints compared to the other cameras?
11” x 14”
are the new cameras I am looking at ( PANASONIC ZS6 or zs5, CANON SX130 is, FUJI S2800 Samsung HZ30W Etc. going to be able to produce Obviously better prints Then my 5 or so year old Kodak 6 MP 3x zoom Z760 camera ? ? ?
a couple of years ago before going On a trip, I wanted to up grade my picture print quality, and get some More Zoom. so I compared a then new Canon (720?) I can't remember the model. but it was a point and shoot 8 MP camera with 6x zoom, and it still had a View Finder. (They need to put those back on cameras that will really retail for $150 or more! unless there has been some massive improvement on LCD screens and then can be relied upon to be usable out in the sun.)
I thought the Canon would produce obviously better picture when taking the Same Picture as the Kodak..(taken with “same zoom” same composition at the same time, and on LANSCAPE or auto?) When printed. Unfortunately the Canon’s print was Obviously NOT as good as the older lower MP Kodak. a confusing let down. I though since it was a Canon, and had 8 MP instead of 6 MP it would have produced a Better picture than the Kodak.
I ended up returning the canon, and taking my old Kodak.
What is up with that???
I don't want to spend more money on a new camera, and end up with lower quality prints. Does canons SX130 IS smart flash, flash at multiple different intensities? or is just "exposure/processing settings" that are changed?
Does it work any differently Or Noticeably better than Panasonics ZS6 flash, Fuji s2800 flash. or Samsung hz30w ... etc, flashes?
Any thoughts on other cameras that would “beat” these. Or be contenders with a much cheaper price?
Thank You for your assistance. And I welcome hearing from people with first hand experience with these types of cameras. Remember that I am interested in the quality of PRINTS and and I would like to blow up and frame the pics I Like. not really concerned so much how the pictures will look on a computer screen or on the back of a camera. Of course reliability , speed/and ease of use count too...
reply to this comment
and the prospect of being able to take shots and "film" while snorkeling is intriguing. but I can't do much of that around here, or should I say essential No snorkeling around here. :-(
Do you know if there are any really "Still Photo Quality" Differences between the PANASONIC ZS6 , ZS7 or ZS 5? Besides the Global positioning, are there any real differences? Do some have screens that are visible when you are out in full bright sun, and others that are not? How about the ZS1? ( I saw one for $119.99) Any reason to get one over the other? considering the ZS 6 is available "on sale" for $229.99 right now.( i think if not $249 or $279?)
Fuji S2800 $199.00
Canon EX130 is sometimes $229.99
Samsung HZ30W $199.99
Any reasons to get one over the other, or Not to get one?
( like to try and keep the cost under $200 ( but I would I guess I might pay $20 or so dollars more if it is going to get me noticeably better shots/ prints, or a noticeably better camera.) I don't have money to "burn" and I get nervous Taking cameras out doors hiking to get potentially damaged or lost. I would Freak out If I accidentally broke or lost a $300 or more camera while backpacking. And I don’t have the space, or time to mess with extra hassle of SLR, and the weight.. Hmmm but those rugged water proof things... :-? OR are those waterproof cams just and Extra expense for noticeable lower quality pictures? and limited/not useful zoom? in a camera that you wont break... Do you think that the Olympus rugged, or the pentax water proof cameras would produce, Good enough prints compared to the other cameras?
11” x 14”
are the new cameras I am looking at ( PANASONIC ZS6 or zs5, CANON SX130 is, FUJI S2800 Samsung HZ30W Etc. going to be able to produce Obviously better prints Then my 5 or so year old Kodak 6 MP 3x zoom Z760 camera ? ? ?
a couple of years ago before going On a trip, I wanted to up grade my picture print quality, and get some More Zoom. so I compared a then new Canon (720?) I can't remember the model. but it was a point and shoot 8 MP camera with 6x zoom, and it still had a View Finder. (They need to put those back on cameras that will really retail for $150 or more! unless there has been some massive improvement on LCD screens and then can be relied upon to be usable out in the sun.)
I thought the Canon would produce obviously better picture when taking the Same Picture as the Kodak..(taken with “same zoom” same composition at the same time, and on LANSCAPE or auto?) When printed. Unfortunately the Canon’s print was Obviously NOT as good as the older lower MP Kodak. a confusing let down. I though since it was a Canon, and had 8 MP instead of 6 MP it would have produced a Better picture than the Kodak.
I ended up returning the canon, and taking my old Kodak.
What is up with that???
I don't want to spend more money on a new camera, and end up with lower quality prints. Does canons SX130 IS smart flash, flash at multiple different intensities? or is just "exposure/processing settings" that are changed?
Does it work any differently Or Noticeably better than Panasonics ZS6 flash, Fuji s2800 flash. or Samsung hz30w ... etc, flashes?
Any thoughts on other cameras that would “beat” these. Or be contenders with a much cheaper price?
Thank You for your assistance. And I welcome hearing from people with first hand experience with these types of cameras. Remember that I am interested in the quality of PRINTS and and I would like to blow up and frame the pics I Like. not really concerned so much how the pictures will look on a computer screen or on the back of a camera. Of course reliability , speed/and ease of use count too...
Endless confusion, need straight Relevant Clarity. (Getting Close? — 11/04/2010)
So when you' are rating picture quality, you a rating in on a nice point and shoot cameras scale, and Not as compared to a "$600 and up" SLR? I wish everyone would do that.
The bottom line for me when it comes to a "still camera" is the final, unadulterated , straight from the camera printable picture quality is what counts. ( I Kind of don't have the time and patience for photo shop. And there are other things I would rather spend the money on. My opinion with all equipment is, get equipment that works 'right" and don't waste your time trying to "fix" the "product" of equipment that doesn't. remember I have no patience ;-) ) Video would be nice, but not the issue. And I don't want more than 720 hi def.
"toy features" are cute but not really relevant. I want Good photo quality, in outdoor high contrast conditions, and in a wide range of lighting conditions/brightness levels. A wide angle would be great since many of my " panoramic outdoor shots" have been limited by my current "34MM or 36 MM equivalent 3x zoom lens now. And I would really like some good Zoom to get in on things that I can not get to , or not take an extra hour or 2 to hike to get close enough for a good pic with only 3x zoom. Oh and of course I do like Macro.
Sure it would be nice if it took good pictures indoors, for birthday party or Christmas present opening. but that is not really that critical, and probably would not, or rarely get a photo that way, that I would want to blow up, and put on the wall. . Those always seem like 4"x6" or maybe 5"x8" photo album type pics to me, and not that critical? What I want is a good , Primarily outdoor Scenery ( and hopefully wild life if I can find it/"catch it) camera. to take hiking and get good scenery pics. Hopefully to frame. And I need the "best" quality I can get in that price range. As I may never be able to get to the location to take the pic ever again. No trying again the next day or week. And of course it would be nice it it could be relied upon to take good looking/printing indoor shots, and video if possible. but it seems the video will just eat up your memory card. So it looks like those 2 concerns are definitely secondary. although it would be nice to be able to get good video, and not have to bring my non hi def camcorder along. but the dang camera memory devouring of video... So I think I have narrowed my choices down to . the Pansonic ZS6 (global positioning in the ZS7 sounds cute, but I don't think it is important enough to rationalize the extra cost. And faster battery draining? ) the Canon SX130 is or the Fuji finepix S2800 (or maybe S1800 they are the same price this month.) or the Samsung HZ35W What I have noticed on my 5 or 6 year old Kodak Z760 is that the screen is un-viewable often when hiking now. but it has a viewfinder.
only one of the cameras I was trying to narrow things down from had a view finder of any kind. I was almost thinking of getting the Fuji to "punish" everyone else for not bothering to put a view finder on the cameras. then I started thinking, maybe the screens are much better now so they can be used out in the Desert, or Hawaii or any bright light situations. Is this now the case???
I am very confused. First I think I’ll go for the Samsung HZ30W, I hear its “great” then I hear that is has only a mediocre lens and sensor, and only produces so so prints, or bad “wrinkly” prints. Same type of deal with Fuji. Then I start getting led to believe the Panasonic ZS6 is by by far better.. Then who knows.. Then I find out pansaonic will supposedly only work with panasoinc batteries. Not after market batteries. Like ultra last? I really hate that, and proprietary connectors or memory.. That usually get me P.O. enough to make me Not buy something.
Then I read on Panasonics site that there are some after market batteries that will work on there cameras, then I write to ask them, and they say no..
Then I read the Canon SX130 IS is good, or above average. Then I read “they are the best” Then I read not so good and noisy, and unreliable.
Endless confusion and frustration. !
Do you have any Good ;-) thoughts on which of those three camera's would be "noticeably better than the others. for a one camera person, that wants to be able to blow up good SCENERY, macro, & wildlife pics? Hiking, backpacking, camping, picnicking pics?
Also, do you know if all three of those cameras will remember that you do not want the flash to automatically go of after turning the camera off, and the restarting? My current one does Not. When I turn the camera back on to take a pic after having set the flash off.. It will flash again after restarting it, usually messing up the picture, and draining the battery. Sometimes causing me to miss the shot.
And Do you know if that Canon ex130 is intelligent contrast feature that can "detect areas in the scene that are too bright or dark and automatically adjust them to the optimum brightness when shooting." is just a marketing gimmick, and the other cameras have the same feature/exposure settings, listed as something else, or are just Automatic?
Do you know if the other cameras have setting like canons "Positive Film" color setting? (Canon also has a Vivid color setting) setting, it looks interesting/promising.
Oh and do you know if cameras with the SUSNET scene setting will actually end up getting better sunset pictures than a camera without a specifically listed. Under “auto intelligent, or some other setting?
Do you off hand remember if any of these cameras have the feature that lets you compose a picture then it holds a "ghost" image on the screen, and you can hand the camera to someone to take the picture after you get in it. and all they have to do is line up the ghost image over what the see on the screen, they can then take the composition that you wanted?
I look forward to you reply, and from anybody that has any experience with these cameras. And remember I am really interested in Printed picture quality. Not how something looks on a computer screen or the back of a camera.
Thank you.
reply to this comment
The bottom line for me when it comes to a "still camera" is the final, unadulterated , straight from the camera printable picture quality is what counts. ( I Kind of don't have the time and patience for photo shop. And there are other things I would rather spend the money on. My opinion with all equipment is, get equipment that works 'right" and don't waste your time trying to "fix" the "product" of equipment that doesn't. remember I have no patience ;-) ) Video would be nice, but not the issue. And I don't want more than 720 hi def.
"toy features" are cute but not really relevant. I want Good photo quality, in outdoor high contrast conditions, and in a wide range of lighting conditions/brightness levels. A wide angle would be great since many of my " panoramic outdoor shots" have been limited by my current "34MM or 36 MM equivalent 3x zoom lens now. And I would really like some good Zoom to get in on things that I can not get to , or not take an extra hour or 2 to hike to get close enough for a good pic with only 3x zoom. Oh and of course I do like Macro.
Sure it would be nice if it took good pictures indoors, for birthday party or Christmas present opening. but that is not really that critical, and probably would not, or rarely get a photo that way, that I would want to blow up, and put on the wall. . Those always seem like 4"x6" or maybe 5"x8" photo album type pics to me, and not that critical? What I want is a good , Primarily outdoor Scenery ( and hopefully wild life if I can find it/"catch it) camera. to take hiking and get good scenery pics. Hopefully to frame. And I need the "best" quality I can get in that price range. As I may never be able to get to the location to take the pic ever again. No trying again the next day or week. And of course it would be nice it it could be relied upon to take good looking/printing indoor shots, and video if possible. but it seems the video will just eat up your memory card. So it looks like those 2 concerns are definitely secondary. although it would be nice to be able to get good video, and not have to bring my non hi def camcorder along. but the dang camera memory devouring of video... So I think I have narrowed my choices down to . the Pansonic ZS6 (global positioning in the ZS7 sounds cute, but I don't think it is important enough to rationalize the extra cost. And faster battery draining? ) the Canon SX130 is or the Fuji finepix S2800 (or maybe S1800 they are the same price this month.) or the Samsung HZ35W What I have noticed on my 5 or 6 year old Kodak Z760 is that the screen is un-viewable often when hiking now. but it has a viewfinder.
only one of the cameras I was trying to narrow things down from had a view finder of any kind. I was almost thinking of getting the Fuji to "punish" everyone else for not bothering to put a view finder on the cameras. then I started thinking, maybe the screens are much better now so they can be used out in the Desert, or Hawaii or any bright light situations. Is this now the case???
I am very confused. First I think I’ll go for the Samsung HZ30W, I hear its “great” then I hear that is has only a mediocre lens and sensor, and only produces so so prints, or bad “wrinkly” prints. Same type of deal with Fuji. Then I start getting led to believe the Panasonic ZS6 is by by far better.. Then who knows.. Then I find out pansaonic will supposedly only work with panasoinc batteries. Not after market batteries. Like ultra last? I really hate that, and proprietary connectors or memory.. That usually get me P.O. enough to make me Not buy something.
Then I read on Panasonics site that there are some after market batteries that will work on there cameras, then I write to ask them, and they say no..
Then I read the Canon SX130 IS is good, or above average. Then I read “they are the best” Then I read not so good and noisy, and unreliable.
Endless confusion and frustration. !
Do you have any Good ;-) thoughts on which of those three camera's would be "noticeably better than the others. for a one camera person, that wants to be able to blow up good SCENERY, macro, & wildlife pics? Hiking, backpacking, camping, picnicking pics?
Also, do you know if all three of those cameras will remember that you do not want the flash to automatically go of after turning the camera off, and the restarting? My current one does Not. When I turn the camera back on to take a pic after having set the flash off.. It will flash again after restarting it, usually messing up the picture, and draining the battery. Sometimes causing me to miss the shot.
And Do you know if that Canon ex130 is intelligent contrast feature that can "detect areas in the scene that are too bright or dark and automatically adjust them to the optimum brightness when shooting." is just a marketing gimmick, and the other cameras have the same feature/exposure settings, listed as something else, or are just Automatic?
Do you know if the other cameras have setting like canons "Positive Film" color setting? (Canon also has a Vivid color setting) setting, it looks interesting/promising.
Oh and do you know if cameras with the SUSNET scene setting will actually end up getting better sunset pictures than a camera without a specifically listed. Under “auto intelligent, or some other setting?
Do you off hand remember if any of these cameras have the feature that lets you compose a picture then it holds a "ghost" image on the screen, and you can hand the camera to someone to take the picture after you get in it. and all they have to do is line up the ghost image over what the see on the screen, they can then take the composition that you wanted?
I look forward to you reply, and from anybody that has any experience with these cameras. And remember I am really interested in Printed picture quality. Not how something looks on a computer screen or the back of a camera.
Thank you.
GPS download server does not work. Do not buy this camera. (Don408 — 09/24/2010)
I purchased this camera to use the GPS function for geo-tagging my photographs. Unfortunately the download process of the Mapview and City programs from Samsung server does not work. Therefore the GPS on the camera does not work. Their tech support doesn't have a clue about this camera. each time I have called tech support they have promised to escalate this to a higher level stating that someone will call me back in 24 to 48 hours, well I'm going on five days now, no phone call. Does anyone have the Map_USA zip file from Samsung.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (09/25/2010)
I'd take it back. If the store objects get your credit card company involved.
reply to this comment
Get your maps here (Chris — 08/07/2010)
You guys can get your maps here. A contributer to the DP Review forums batched them up for you.
forums.dpreview.com/forums/... was looking for credible reviews. To downgrade a review based upon availability is the silliest aspect I have ever heard of in a review.
reply to this comment
forums.dpreview.com/forums/... was looking for credible reviews. To downgrade a review based upon availability is the silliest aspect I have ever heard of in a review.
Liam McCabe (08/09/2010)
Thanks for sharing the link. I'm sure you've heard sillier things than that, but our thinking is that the fewer outlets that have it available, the less likely you'll find a good price -- competition is good for the consumer, and all that.
reply to this comment
GPS function does not work. (David Frank — 07/21/2010)
How can you recommend this camera? It is impossible to use the GPS function. You have to load the maps. The US site has been down for months. The English site has the downloads, but the "city" will not unzip. Their tech support admits they cannot help.
Imagine if some company like Apple did this, what a scandal it would be.
Samsung must pay you for your biased ad.
reply to this comment
Imagine if some company like Apple did this, what a scandal it would be.
Samsung must pay you for your biased ad.
HZ35W City map problem (Dave McElhinny — 07/24/2010)
I am having the same problem. Downloaded the zipped files to Mac and PC but neither could correctly unzip the city file required to make the map feature work. Contacted support via email a week ago but no response.
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (08/06/2010)
I'd hardly say that we're recommending it. If you read the review, we say that you should buy the HZ30W if anything, and I pointed out the GPS as a major flaw. Return your camera if you're not satisfied.
reply to this comment
HZ30W Review? (Craig — 07/01/2010)
I suspect this review to be of the HZ30W and not the HZ35W. The image quality you achieved is exactly that of the HZ30W, whereas the HZ35W does have imporved image quality as can be seen on many other review sites such as dpreview.com, where this camera earns a gold award. If you did indeed use the HZ30W thinking it was the same camera, you are mistaken. Please revise this review accordingly. Or at the very least, get another HZ35W to test and see if the one you used for the review is damaged or defective. In the end, it may just be the user and not the camera.
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (07/01/2010)
No mistake. It was indeed the HZ35W, shipped directly to us from Samsung. I don't know what to tell you -- I tried it with a wide range of settings in a variety of situations, and what you see above is what I got from the camera. I also believe that the HZ30W and HZ35W have the exact same optics (lens, sensor, processor) so the image quality would likely be identical anyway -- the only differences are the screen and GPS unit.
I've seen the DPReview writeup as well, and I had a hard time believing their assessment based on my experience with this camera. Maybe I did get a faulty model, so I'll get in touch with Samsung to see what they think. Thanks for reading and have a pleasant day.
reply to this comment
I've seen the DPReview writeup as well, and I had a hard time believing their assessment based on my experience with this camera. Maybe I did get a faulty model, so I'll get in touch with Samsung to see what they think. Thanks for reading and have a pleasant day.
Liam McCabe (07/06/2010)
Update here: I contacted Samsung and let them know that some visitors were concerned that we may have reviewed a defective unit. They said that they'd look into that, but also noted that the HZ35W will be discontinued in August. Guess it hasn't been selling particularly well.
reply to this comment
Jinwons (07/15/2010)
Could you provide source of that info? It doesn't make sense for them to discontinue HZ35W so soon without any following up model. I got HZ30W three weeks ago and very happy with its photo/video performance. I think HZ35W would work as good as HZ30W for the photo/video quality.
Only the GPS in it seems to get mixed reviews as some users are having difficulty using it properly in U.S. I think they should have done better job on the GPS manual/procedure for U.S.
reply to this comment
Only the GPS in it seems to get mixed reviews as some users are having difficulty using it properly in U.S. I think they should have done better job on the GPS manual/procedure for U.S.
GPS not supported (David Frank — 07/21/2010)
You have to load the maps in order to use GPS. The downloads are no longer supported, so GPS will not function.
No wonder they are discontinuing the camers.
reply to this comment
No wonder they are discontinuing the camers.
Liam McCabe (08/06/2010)
The source of info was Samsung Imaging's PR representative, from R&J PR.
reply to this comment
Does the lens retract fully? (Jasper — 07/01/2010)
Does the lens retract fully at 24mm like the ZS7? or does part of it remain protruded?
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (07/01/2010)
The lens is not flush with the body at the wide-angle, no, if that's what you're asking.
reply to this comment
Worse photos than a three year old point-and-shoot? (Russell - Idaho USA — 06/13/2010)
I am the owner of a great Samsung point and shoot of three years ago; the $129 S730. It is pretty worn out now, but still takes great shots in anything but low light. I am amazed at how bad your test photos for the HZ35W are at full resolution! The purple fringing (even in full daylight!), the 'blotchyness' in the shadows; even the leaves on the trees look like they were painted instead of high-res digital photos. Is this just a function of getting that many megapixels from that size of sensor or does it just take worse photos than a camera you can get on ebay for under $50?
Russell - Idaho USA
reply to this comment
Russell - Idaho USA
It should be given higher grade here (Jinwons — 05/17/2010)
I agree to previous comments that this one deserves grade better than B+. If the low availability was the reason, it seems like that is no longer the case.
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (05/18/2010)
Yes point taken. I'm reviewing it now and I agree that it deserves a higher grade now, I'll bump it up.
reply to this comment
B+ too low (David Dorino — 04/07/2010)
Why has this been given a grade of B+ - it is a superb camera. Excellent alternative to ZS7
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (04/07/2010)
Hi David. We've given it a B+ because it's not widely available yet, and we're still not sure how many merchants will carry it. We agree that it looks like a great camera, but we factor its availability into the grade. If it's only going to be available from 3-4 merchants, then that might say something about the quality in relation to pricing. And we're more likely to give an established company like Panasonic a higher initial grade, rather than a newer digicam company like Samsung.
When this camera is more widely available (and preferably, when Samsung sends us a unit to review), we'll raise the grade. So to be clear, the grade doesn't reflect only how good the camera is, but rather if it's worthy of your dollars. Hope this clears things up.
Have you tried the camera yourself? Care to leave a review?
reply to this comment
When this camera is more widely available (and preferably, when Samsung sends us a unit to review), we'll raise the grade. So to be clear, the grade doesn't reflect only how good the camera is, but rather if it's worthy of your dollars. Hope this clears things up.
Have you tried the camera yourself? Care to leave a review?
one thing missing in it (M J — 02/15/2010)
If only it had a viewfinder, I'd eagerly await its arrival on the market.
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (02/23/2010)
Yeah viewfinders seem to be a commodity on point and shoots these days, but I'm with you.
reply to this comment
battery life (baki — 03/17/2010)
how many pictures can be taken with one fuul battery ?
reply to this comment
More info please ( — 02/11/2010)
Let's see some more info on this camera. Like when will it be available?
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (02/11/2010)
This is set for release sometime in April. Since it's so far out, we don't really have much more info, no word on pricing either. Not even listed on Samsung's website yet, but here's a link to an Engadget article that pretty much has all the same info we listed here, plus the press release.
engadget.com/2010/01/18/sam...
reply to this comment
engadget.com/2010/01/18/sam...
