Hey! You should know that this product has been discontinued. Here are our current recommended cameras in the Extended Zoom Digital Cameras category.
Sony CyberShot H2
Editor's Review
The Sony Cybershot H2 enters the extended zoom fray, butting heads with Canon's S3IS and Kodak's Z612 cameras to offer full 12x optical zoom. The H2 bears a striking resemblance to those other models, with a solid 6 megapixel sensor on top of that long-distance range. It's a nice looking camera with some good features, but doesn't have anything special to really differentiate itself from its peers. The Sony H5 at least pushes the envelope with a 7.2 MP sensor.
Specifications
- 6 megapixels
- 12x optical zoom / 2x digital zoom
- auto and manual focus
- auto and manual exposure
- ISO 80-1000
- JPEG file format
- movie mode
- 2 AA batteries
- 2.5 inch LCD
- Memory Stick storage (32MB internal)
- Part Number: DSCH2
- UPC: 027242679504
- Release Date: Mar 03, 2006
Shop for H2 Accessories
Sony CyberShot H2 Comments & Questions (write your own!)
thanks for your answer. i did reset the camera and ran the tests again. unfortunately, the images still look brighter in the camera than on the computer by about one stop or so.
It's not on Macro.
It's not on continuous focus
I have formatted the card.
I love this camera and have had it for about 2 yrs. Please help i'm missing memories
Lost the manual
You can find your manual online here ( 129.33.22.12/release/DSCH2.pdf ). As for the flash not firing, make sure your camera is not set in high sensitivity mode (high ISO) or Exposure Bracket is set either. You can force the flash on by pushing the flash button (looks like a lightning bolt) when in "Beach" (palm tree icon), "High-speed Shutter" (golfer icon), or "Landscape" (mountain icon) modes. If it still does not work after doing these things, I would contact Sony tech support ( esupport.sony.com/US/perl/c... ). Good luck, and please let us know how it works out for you.
Andrew
I'm not sure what you're asking with the number 73. This is a 6MP camera. If you want a new camera with better resolution, you can get them upwards of 12MP now if you want to spend the money.
If you want to improve the resolution of the photos you're currently taking with this camera, make sure you have the finest resolution set in your menu, and do not use digital zoom. The digital zoom degrades the resolution of the photos you take. I hope this helps. Good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
There are camera repair manuals floating around the web. Do a google search. And hopefully, one of our intrepid advisors can find it for you, he's quite good at that.
I have the same problem. It just popped off while in the case.
Any luck getting it fixed ?
This is a great camera for what I need just the @#$#@! button.
It is clear to me that the material that the shaft is made out of is too thin, and too weak to be kept under constant tension by the spring that is located beneath it.
My camera was either in use, or in its case. It was treated very gently. I had the camera about 1 year before the button came off.
I snapped off the old one with my fingers.. One of the tabs broke off.
I took the new part to a camera shop you need a special tool to hold it and twist it in the camera.
Camera works fine with the new part...
Diners Club, and installed by supplied CD. But it does not
work out. In other words, USB cable connect to my PC,
but my PC does not recognised this camera. (Hong Kong SAR)
When it is plugged in to the computer via the USB cable, can you see the camera in the My Computer menu? It should be listed below the computer's disk drives (assuming you're running Windows XP or Vista).
Also, exactly which software have you installed? Is it the drivers for the camera, or is it a full program?
Thanks!
operating system would be the best place to start, Ben (above) asks the all important question - did you install the driver or the application software? When you plug the camera into your computer, do you see a notification pop-up from the computer saying it has found a new device?
Look on your installation disk for the driver and install that.
If you need more than that, there are many books and journals on photography that you can find in the book store. That's how I learn, bit by bit, over the years.
For a start, you may wish to log on to <a href="digital-photo-secrets.com/b... site</a> to read about "....... a Fast, Easy, Affordable Way To Access Professional Picture-Taking Secrets And Capture The Best Digital Images Of Your Life"
You will also find a wealth of information on the net if you log on to <a href="dcviews.com/tutors.htm"... location</a>.
Lastly, you may download a demo version of <a href="123di.com/Download/DemoDire... about digital imaging</a> to introduce you to the subject of digital photography.
Hope this helps,
Mark
Would this camera be enough for an amateur?
I'm not terribly knowledgable about Olympus, so the best answer I can give you about this particular camera is that from the reviews I've read, it performs pretty well in terms of picture quality, and that zoom is a great thing. But I do have one caution: this camera uses Digital Image Stabilization. While Digital IS is better than not having any at all, if you tend to have any camera shake (esp. likely with long zoom shots), you may want to choose something with Optical Image Stabilization instead. The difference between the two is that Digital IS manipulates your image slightly to compensate for shake (thus lowering image quality somewhat), whereas Optical IS is a physical adjustment inside the camera that compensates for the shaking lens and has better all-around results.
If you're not too worried about shake, then this isn't a factor. If you are, <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... is our full list of extended zoom cameras. If you read the profiles, most of them list the type of image stabilization they use.
If you're interested in a camera that offers a lot of control (if you want to learn more about photography) but still lets you take good photos on Auto mode, I'd suggest the Canon Powershot S3 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). Some might say it's kind of heavy duty for a point and shoot amateur, but as I said, if you want the OPTION to do a lot more with your camera, that's a great choice. That one has Optical IS as well.
I'd steer clear of the Panasonics; while great cameras, once they get over 5mp the images tend to have grain issues.
Also check out the Sony H2 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) or one of the Fujis. The Kodak Easyshare Z650 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) has a tempting price, but I believe this camera doesn't have stabilization at all, so you may have issues with long zooms.
Hope some of that helps. If you need more advice deciding, let me know.
the photo below was taken with a fz7
the fz7 has 6 mega pixels
there appears to be very little grain
flickr.com/photo_zoom.gne?i...
The grain problem with the Panasonics (in my experience) comes into play when light is not as strong. In outdoor shots, most cameras can perform decently regardless of the noise on the sensor, because there's enough light to cover a multitude of sins. I'm not going to link to a Canon photo or something, because unless it was taken at the same location, same time etc. as the Panasonic one, it wouldn't be a good comparison. But in my opinion the photos are still cleaner.
Although the OP is planning on shooting at the park, when she gets home (or into the lodge, or whatever) and uses the camera to take pictures indoors, I'm thinking she may be dissatisfied with the quality.
Also, at 6mp, I should say, the difference is less dramatic; the problem seems to multiply the higher the megapixels. At 6mp no camera is perfect.
Of course, there are lots of people who disagree with me on this, but after fairly extensive use of Panasonics vs. other brands, it's what I've found about its behavior, and if people are looking for all-around image quality, I make sure to mention that many users are dissatisfied with these.
thank you for your reply
how to avoid darken image in the lower aspect while taking close up pics?
what is the usefulness of conversion lens?
Is it necessary to purchase a separate adaptor for conversion lens
If so what is the price of it?
Unfortunately, the only real way to avoid this darkening--which comes from the lens housing itself getting in the way of the light source--is to improve the lighting. Try to position your light in such a way that it's on the far side of the lens, but not in the lens's line of sight.
As for conversion lenses, in my experience add-on lenses for non-SLR cameras are mostly junk. They tend to distort images, mess up the focal length, etc. I wouldn't recommend them.
Good luck!
i use separate light source to take such pictures
but it is time taken and not useful in day today practice
"1. Press the focus button repeatedly to select (hand w/f symbol). The manual focus bar appears.
2. Set the bar to the desired distance with the </> on the control button.
3. Press O (this is a dark dot). The (hand w/f symbol) changes from yellow to white. Press O again to reset distance."
From there, it should be set. That's a heck of a lot to do in order to focus something manually.
ym
I'm a little confused with your description here. You say that when you go to load the pictures on your computer, you still get movies. Do you mean that you actually get movie files that you can play in, say, Windows Media Player? Or is it more like a still image of a film strip, with a series of still images lined up next to one another?
What program are you using to view the files, and what mode (on the mode dial) are you shooting in with your H2?
Thanks.
We just got the camera at Christmas and haven't used a lot.
Thanks for any help.
I would rate Image stabilizer and high ISO sensitivity, among others, to be more significant for most users and Sony H2 has them all.
You would find this camera far more superior to Aiptek, particularly in low light conditions when the Super Steady Shot optical image stabilization really become handy.
Andrew
Hope that helps.
Seems like you might need to reinstall the drivers for your H2 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). Unfortunately, you can't get them from Sony's website, so unless you have the CD that came with the camera you're out of luck there.
This message board thread ( hometheaterforum.com/htf/ar... ) contains one person's solution to a similar problem, which might work for you.
I'd recommend unplugging any other USB devices you might have connected and then reconnecting your camera to a different USB port. Sometimes there are strange conflicts between USB devices for no apparent reason.
You might also consider getting one of those 8-in-1 memory card readers. They're very cheap and are an easy workaround for issues like this if you can't find a better solution.
Good luck!
Card readers are pretty universal. You shouldn't have any problems.
Good luck!
I will warn you that the A710 has some issues with a slow recharge between photos when using the flash. Some people are disappointed with this, and it might get in the way if you want to take photos quickly. But, it does have a nice zoom and is super easy to use as well as compact, and the image quality is great. Might I suggest the <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... IS</a> if you haven't looked at it already?
In terms of the red eye, this is just a fact of life with ultracompacts, since the flash is so close to the lens. In order to really avoid it you'd have to give up a few features or move up to a larger camera in most cases.
One issue with this camera is that it doesn't have Manual control- it has 16 or so selectable Scene Modes, but if you want Manual control this isn't the camera for you. Not everyone cares about that. It's generally speedy although some people find that the Auto focus runs a little slow. The menus and controls take a little getting used to- the camera has a joystick plus a few levels of Menus and Record Options that you'll have to learn before you can quickly find the settings you want.
Overall though, I've heard that it's a really fun camera to shoot with and that image quality is good particularly for this level of camera and price range. Hope that helps.
The S10 uses a lithium-ion; about 300 shots per charge average, which is pretty good. If that one's still in the running for you, I would say don't worry about the batteries. I prefer AAs myself but the lithium ion with this one is decent.
The H2 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is an excellent camera. The image quality is really good, handling is nice and quick, and it's got great battery life and a nice flash ... my only real issues with this camera are that it doesn't handle itself as well as it could in low light situations (some graininess), and sometimes colors/ highlights seem a little overblown. It also has issues occasionally with chromatic aberration at high zooms- this is fairly common with all extended zooms, it's the purplish fringing around contrasty objects that can sometimes be seen. I also think the movie mode in this camera leaves a little to be desired, but I don't know how important that is to you.
You've mentioned the things you like to take pictures of but I'm curious, what features are important to you? Do you need a large LCD? Do you have to have a lot of zoom? Do you want the option for manual control, or would you rather just point and shoot at all times?
I am really tempted to point you to the Canon S3 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), which in my opinion is the H2 only better, but it is more expensive as well.
Let me know what is important to you and maybe we can help narrow this down a little more.
I would say, after all the cameras we've talked about, swing for the H2 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) if you can afford it. I think the manual control that it does offer will be good if you learn a little more (it's sort of an investment camera to grow on, if that makes sense; I think you'll be more satisfied with a little bit of a learning curve than you would be with a point and shoot). It's also larger than the others we talked about and thus doesn't have the same red eye problems, plus image quality is awfully good esp. considering the price range. I would say, if you can swing it it's worth a little extra cost for the extra features/ flexibility.
I dug up some H2 sample photos too:
dpreview.com/gallery/sonyh2...
Let us know how the H2 goes- <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/forms/... a link</a> if you want to write a review after you've tried it out!
Can you repost your email address or check it to make sure it's correct? I can't figure out why it won't send to you.
Rob, the ones you mentioned are definitely each good cameras in their own way but they have some distinct differences. For example:
SD800 IS= good all-around performance, neat wide angle lens, maybe not the best in low light but pretty good
Panasonics= excellent bargain for price, possible graininess issues in very low light (depends on if you're blowing images up, etc.)
Fuji F30= excellent low light performance, lack of manual control
A710 IS= great image quality, some slow operation times when shooting with flash
As you can see, it will sort of depend on your needs/ preferences as a photographer. Can you give me a few more details on what is important to you/ what kind of shooting you plan to do?
I need assistance in choosing a compact camera with this criteria:
auto focus (I'm not one to fiddle with adjustments).
pocket sized or similar, otherwise I probably would not use it that much.
Long zoom, hopefully 10x as I'm going to Egypt, Turkey and Greece soon and want to capture everything.
Clarity and color.
Optical view finder is preferable.
Fast start up and repeat shots to catch my toddler grandchildren in action.
Good battery life.
Light weight.
Built in lens cover.
I also use a camera to take a lot of house interiors, probably 100 per week in my business.
Is this too tall an order?
I currently use an Olympus C-60 which I've hated from day one.
Previously I used an Olympus D-450 which I loved! It took excellent photos in low light. It took excellent photos period! I broke the battery door or I'd still be using it!
Any help you can provide would be appreciated.
The <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... is yet another entry in a rapidly growing field of SLR-like consumer cameras with extremely long, stabilized zooms. By all accounts it's a fine camera, and most users seem to like it very well.
As to whether 6 megapixels is enough... the answer to that question really depends on what you want out of the camera. Above a certain point (a point somewhere around the 5 megapixel mark), tacking on more megapixels doesn't really matter in terms of how the image looks on your computer. Since most computers have a desktop resolution no higher than 1600x1200 pixels, the images produced by a 5 megapixel camera (2592x1944 pixels) are larger than any consumer monitor can actually display. In other words, they'll always have to be compressed to fit on your monitor. On the other hand, if you want to make large prints of your photographs, megapixels matter very much. The more megapixels, the larger and higher quality the prints you can make. A 6 megapixel camera makes very nice 10x6.5" prints at 300dpi, and you can stretch them another few inches without significant quality loss. This chart ( design215.com/toolbox/megap... ) shows you what print size each megapixel level will achieve at 300dpi.
As I said, there are lots and lots of ultrazoom, image-stabilized cameras these days. You might want to check out similar offerings from Canon (<a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... IS</a> and <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... IS</a>), Panasonic (FZ7), and Sony (<a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... and <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... before you settle on the Kodak. Good luck!
The Canon <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... and <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... IS</a> will do quite well with outdoor action photography in good light. The long, stabilized zoom would be very helpful with shooting airplanes in flight, though you may find their focus lag to be a small bump in the road. In my experience (I own an S2 IS), they take up to half a second to "lock on" to their subject if it's a significant distance away. You'll have to learn to anticipate your shot a little, something you wouldn't have to do with a film or digital SLR.
The picture quality, however, is fantastic, and they both have tons of manual control features to help you get the best out of your rig.
There are several cameras that are similar to the S2 and S3 (huge, stabilized zoom) that you might want to consider. Panasonic offers their Lumix FZ-series (<a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... and Sony offers the CyberShot H-series (<a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita...
Megapixels are often used sort of unscrupulously by advertisers to hook consumers. While it's true in general that more megapixels is better, they aren't the end-all-be-all of digital photography. First of all, in recent model years many manufacturers have turned to a practice called "pixel cramming." This means that when they release a new model, they simply force more pixels onto the same size sensor chip, which results in higher digital "noise" in the pictures. However, the right resolution paired with a correctly-sized chip will of course result in beautiful pictures. The principal advantage of higher-megapixel cameras is the ability to make large prints of photos while retaining fine detail, and this is crucial for the kind of landscape photography you're talking about.
I think that zoom is more important than megapixels here, though. Mega-zoom cameras (generally 10x optical or greater) truly allow you to get up close and capture that detail that the megapixels will eventually record. You want to make sure that you stay away from digital zoom, as it will distort your pictures far more badly than any pixel cramming ever could. Look for cameras with large optical zooms paired with quality lenses. Additionally, many manufacturers offer cameras with stabilized zooms, meaning they compensate for your hands shaking or other environmental issues in order to produce a sharper image. I myself own a Canon Powershot S2 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), which features this kind of technology, and I can tell you that it works spectacularly well.
I'm going to assume that you're not interested in going pro with a digital SLR. Outside of the pro realm, there are really three main options for high-MP, stabilized long zoom:
the Canon S line (S2 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), S3 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ))
the Panasonic FZ line (FZ4 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), FZ5 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), FZ30 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), FZ50 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ))
the Sony H line (H2 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), H5 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ))
All of these cameras have their minor pluses and minuses, but in truth they're all fine machines and all of them would suit your purpose. These are all semi-bulky, SLR-like cameras. You haven't stated here whether you have a preference as to size, but there are also smaller cameras that have similar megapixel and zoom ratings. The reduction in size usually comes at the cost of a reduction in features (fine control over camera settings, etc). Some of these smaller cameras include the Nikon Coolpix S10 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) and the Panasonic Lumix TZ1 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ).
ya the noice subsides when the camera is in play mode and returns in the shoot mode..
Unfortunately, since about the beginning of 2004, Nikon has significantly backed off on their production of "super macro" lenses for their CoolPix line. There are only one or two models that dip even close to the 1" focal range (the CoolPix 4800, most notably, has a 1/3" range), but those are either severely outdated or hampered by other defects that keep them from coming near the top of their class.
There are, however, options from other manufacturers. Most notably, Canon has recently come out with several models with a super macro mode that allows you to essentially touch the subject to the lens glass (for an effective 0" focal length). Models that make use of this capability include the S2 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) and S3 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), which are pretty much top of the line in several other areas as well. The higher-end models in Canon's A-series (A700 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) and up) also offer an impressive macro mode at about 1/3" (1cm) focal range. The Sony CyberShot H2 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) and H5 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) also offer this functionality, well under the 1" range.
Hope this helps a bit!
I noticed you haven't marked a response as Best Answer... are you still looking for help? If so, I recommend re-submitting your question at digitalcamera-hq.com so it has a better chance of being noticed. Lately it looks like questions are being answered within one or two days. Good luck!
In fact, any MemoryStick style memory card will work with your Sony H2 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). You can usually find them at your local retailer or online.
Andrew
I have looked at Sony, Nikon, Cannon S3, Kodak and Panasonic, but i am totally confused.
Thanks for your help
If you are set on keeping it under $300 and especially if you want a more compact camera than the Sony H5 I would recommend the Nikon Coolpix S4 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) which has all the features you are looking for and then some, plus a cool funky design.
There is one other camera that fits your specific needs and that is the Panasonic Lumix TZ1 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) very compact, great price, amazing zoom for its size.
These are all great cameras that have similar features, you can't go wrong with any of them.
The Sony T30 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), for instance, is extremely thin, has anti-shake technology, and has a macro mode allowing you to get to three inches from your subject.
You can lay it right on the paper about .4 inches away - 1CM and it works. You can use it to photograph very small superscript in super macro mode which magnifies to legible font.
I have shot some Aircraft corrosion with it and you can see the grains of the corrosion. It is effective. During magnification the camera shoots a red light and then it flashes. Not sure what the red light does in macro mode
I am in a great confusion in buying slim camera from Sony.
Initially i have decided for T-50 (Touch Screen) but from reviews, it seems to have lot
of problems like -
1. White spots when flash is used.
2. Red eye problem in low light.
Can any one tell me, are these problems present in T-30 ?
Is T-30 worth buying than T-50 ?
Or can any one suggest me some other slim camera which is best ?
Hope this helps.
Sony CyberShot H2 Reviews
Sony CyberShot H2 Reviews by Digital Camera-HQ Users
- 5.0 out of 5
bought a used one after reading many reviews. seemed complex at first but easy one I got used to the menu's and features. probably the best of the Sony H series. sometimes searches for focus in manual modes with long zooms. great overall performance, sharp photos with good color.
- 2.0 out of 5
The camera takes excellent images when it works right. It has known focus issues and the shutter release button releases itself from the camera without warning. Very expensive to have repaired and Sony doesn't care to address the problem. I had the same problemw it the Sony H1 .. the flaw is in the design.
- 4.0 out of 5
this is a fab camera - love it overall and anything better would get you into DSLR territory.
its downside is anything to do with low light situations. i.e - high iso, use of flash, quality of pics with flash etc.
used with a tripod its great.
movie mode is good too.
i am upgrading to the canon 450D (xsi) but will always keep and find a use for this camera.
Zoom is great.
- 1.0 out of 5
dont go for this guy, it has major autofocus flaw, and sony service center wont help you out with this, they cant give you permanent solution to the problem so you have to visit them too often.
Worst camera of my life
- 4.0 out of 5
overall it is a great camera—especially in natural settigs
picture quality is superb outdoors
good indoors
okay in low light
but if have shots you can't miss, or moving objects in low light either try another camera or set it on sports setting and hope for the best
- 5.0 out of 5
I bought this H2 for an excursion in the Amazon rain forest in January 07. The 12X zoom was wonderful, and envied by other p&s camera users. Resolution is very good, day and night, and I have some great shots of birds and wild life from distances otherwise only accessible by binoculars. The camera lives up to all the specs claimed. My only complaint is in slow reaction time between shots, especially moving action. Invariably when I take a scenic shot from a moving tour bus window, I get the next utility pole in the middle of the photo. But the overall quality of my photos is excellent, under a variety of light conditions.
- 4.0 out of 5
Sony to a certain degree make hardware quite well, they do not make good software. One shouldn't purchase Sony hardware and expect a full software suite to be made available to them, on the off chance of something like that ocouring, its a definite bonus. Go download Google's Picasa if you want brilliantly designed and highly intuitive software to manage your image collection...
Back to the camera itself:
Like many of the reviews already posted, I have found the flash recharge time to be so slow as to miss 99.9% of opportunities for low light image capture. The camera, although wonderful in the majority of aspects, fails to capture any decent low light images at all, regardless of the settings. I bring a camera to every gig I attend and the Sony H2 takes the worst, grainy noise filled images in the absence of any form of decent light source, unless you want to blind the performers with your intrusive flash; something I refuse to do out of respect.
In decent light, the H2 takes vividly crisp images, I have captured some wonderful images of moving water (sea/rivers), animal on the move (humming birds/dogs running/cats leaping/snakes), nature in all its glory (from bright snow filled mountain vistas in Tuscon to achingly red rock canyons in Sedona to the flowing green hills of Ireland) and multiple portraits of humans and still life objects.
I would recommend this camera to anyone who will be doing the majority of their shooting during the day or with adequate light sources available. Its a fine point-and-shoot model and has enough automatic options to keep most of us happy for the price.
The design has provided zero issues for either myself or my wife, we share the camera so its in use almost daily. It suits both of us in terms of functionality and results!
(We got ours for a substantial saving through best buy by purchasing on their online store for in store pick up)
- 3.0 out of 5
i fix cameras that only happens 2 ways only obvious drop a inned or a month latter flies out or if you are not pushing that button soft and slow awy they go on all cameras
- 2.0 out of 5
This camera takes great pictures; zoom is great & fun to use. The Sony software is not user friendly. Everything I do (sending pictures, saving to a disk, and printing) is painful. Previously used Kodak Easy Share. That software is so easy to use. I would never buy another Sony.
- 3.0 out of 5
This is the third Sony camera I have owned. I have had no major problems and have liked the quality of this camera until my shutter release button flew away. I use this in my work so this was a major problem. Shipping the camera off for repair is a terrible option. Now I have read that this is a fairly common occurance. Duct tape on my $30 replacement button seems likely.
- 2.0 out of 5
Shutter button broke off by itself in the case.
Shutter button is under constant pressure by a spring beneath it. The shaft for the button is very narrow, and it breaks after awhile.
Check the internet (Keywords dsc-h2 shutter problem). It is all there.
- 4.0 out of 5
The Sony CyberShot H2 is the 4th digital camera I`ve owned and, so far, the best. Before digital cameras came along I used Minolta and Nikon SLRs. My only complaint with the Sony is how quickly the batteries go dead. If they could come with a portable battery pack that lasted longer I would like the Sony a lot more. If I had the money I would buy a Canon digital SLR, but, for the price the Sony does a good job. It takes excellent pictures.
- 3.0 out of 5
A very nice camera with good image output.
But the camera is way too slow when shooting with flash on (flash recharge takes time) - and burst mode does not support flash. So, when needed to take quick images with flash on - this camera would be a shame. For other reasons, its a great camera.
- 4.0 out of 5
Overall, a great camera. Amazing high-speed shutter action. My first weekend out, I shot pictures out the side of my van while traveling at over 55 mph; perfect clarity. On the other hand, the auto setting is extremely frustrating. I've missed a ton of great shot because the stupid thing just wouldn't take the picture. I'm experimenting now with the manual mode; having better results.
- 5.0 out of 5
This is my second digital camera. The first being a five year old Canon Powershot. The Canon has always taken very good outdoor pictures, but has never impressed me with its indoor shots. In Canon defense it is only 2.1 megapixels and over five years old. The Sony Cybershot H2 has taken excellent indoor pictures. To me that is the biggest difference I have seen. The outdoor shots are sharp and clear. I highly recommend.
- 3.0 out of 5
hi
The pictures were excellent and i had no memory problems. But my camera had a problem with the motor inside it stated to sound like a laptop hard drive so i have returned the camera to the dealer....
- 5.0 out of 5
I read many review and tested out tons of cameras and decided to go with this one. So far I'm really loving it! it snaps pics so fast! which is what I was looking for because I have a very active 2year old and with my old digital and the delay I always missed the great moments.
- 1.0 out of 5
The flash recharge takes too long to fire - I have missed so many shoots of my kids. Night images are terrible and blurry. The camera is very frustrating and I'm returning it.
- 5.0 out of 5
I bought this camera a week ago for my wife for Christmas (sorry, I meant to say the holiday) and have had no problem with the 1 gig SanDisk. The zoom is incredible. She can take a shot of a license plate from 200 yards and after digitally zooming into the pic further, can read the expiration date very clearly!!! We haven't even begun to explore the other possibilities this camera has to offer. Thanks Sony for jumping on that SanDisk problem so quick and giving us a killer camera for a great price.
- 5.0 out of 5
wow!! you will be amazed!!!!!!
- 5.0 out of 5
I'm still learning all the benefits of this great camera, my favorite is the multi-burst shots. It take a series of 12 pics to break down the motion. This is awesome if you have children in baseball or gymnastics like I do. I was able to watch my sons pitching in slow motion, great training tool! I've had no memory card problems. Only negative is it burns through batteries fast but you have the option of using the rechargeable set it comes with or regular AA batteries. The zoom is amazing, day or night. Its a great camera.
- 4.0 out of 5
the digcam has 12x zoom but u can zoom it up to 52x for detailed information prety sharp and crisp images......
excelent built
- 5.0 out of 5
I love this camera. I take ALOT of pictures and haven't had any problems with it at all. I read that alot of people had trouble with the memory sticks. I didn't have any. Maybe i was just lucky. The pictures have all came out very clear and the zoom on this camera is great. It is also very easy to use. This would be good for beginners or experienced users.
- 4.0 out of 5
I have taken about 900 pictures with my H2. Excellent results. Of course, you gotta know at least basics on camera use! (If U don't, U better get a fixed focus pont & shoot). This one has all you can need for great photos. The zoom is a delight. My wife uses the full auto mode and gets mush better pictures than with smaller digitals. I use program, play around with focal length, aperture, ISO, etc... for great effects and shots. Y got a polarizer lens wich makes outdoor-sunny day pictures extraordinary! I did have a SanDisk incompatibility problem, though (in spite of serial numbre not matching the ones published by Sony), only reason I didn't give it an "excellent" mark. Got a Sony MS and works like a wonder!
- 1.0 out of 5
It is incredible that Sony continues to sell H2's with the known problem of incompatability with SanDisk memory sticks. Unfortunately I did not know about the problem until I purchased the camera. Sorry, but there is no way I am going to download and reload the firmware on a camera I just bought. Sony should have pulled all the affected cameras from the shelfs and not put customers through this fiasco. Fortunately, the store I bought the camera from gave me a full refund.
- 4.0 out of 5
its a nice camera to start with decent budget
- 3.0 out of 5
I have already had to return two cameras to the retailer for "failure to read the memory stick". This third one seems to work, and yes I am using the Sony memory stick. At first I tried using a SanDisk but found after speaking with Sony Customer Service that they are not compatible. The pictures are of a good quality, once you realize that the steady shot and auto focus are not all they are cracked up to be on this camera. Rely more on skill and your eye than technology.
