Sony Cybershot H3
Sony Cybershot H3
1
Hey! You should know that this product has been discontinued. Here are our current recommended cameras in the Extended Zoom Digital Cameras category.
Sony Cybershot H3
Editor's Review
The Sony Cybershot H3 is a delightful addition to the brand's stable of capable, powerful extended zoom cameras. With an excellent 10x optical zoom coupled with Sony's Super SteadyShot image stabilization, photographers will find themselves taking crisp, clear shots of distant subjects, with no need to worry about the blurs and blotches associated with shaking hands.
Specifications
- 8.1 megapixels
- 10x optical zoom / 20x digital zoom
- Sony Super SteadyShot Image Stabilization
- JPEG file format
- Auto focus
- Auto and manual exposure
- ISO 100-3200
- 2.5-inch LCD display
- Memory Stick Duo storage (31MB internal)
- Lithium-ion battery
- Part Number: DSCH3S
- UPC: 410100268970
- Release Date: Aug 29, 2007
Shop for H3 Accessories
Sony Cybershot H3 Comments & Questions (write your own!)
Flash Operation (LSefton — 11/18/2009)
I bought the camera on line used. How is the flash supposed to operate? The only way I have found is to manually pull it open.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (11/18/2009)
You can pick up a PDF copy of the manual here ( esupport.sony.com/US/perl/m... ) iif you don't have one. But what I would do is reset the camera. Sony calls it "reinitializing." It can be done three ways ....
Using an Initialize option in the menu
Since Cyber-shot cameras have different menu system layouts, refer to the instruction manual specific for your camera model.
Using a RESET button
1. Locate the RESET button on the camera.
2. Use a pointed object (like a ballpoint pen) to press and hold the RESET button for 2-3 seconds.
3. After 2-3 seconds has elapsed, release the RESET button.
Performing a manual power reset
1. Turn off the camera.
2. Remove the battery pack.
3. Remove the button-sized lithium battery.
4. Allow the camera to remain without power for 30 seconds.
5. Reinsert the button-sized lithium battery.
6. Reinsert the battery pack.
Now your camera should be back to factory default settings and the flash should automatically pop up in low light situations.
While you' have the battery out, clean the contacts with a pencil eraser. I'd also go to SonyStyle.com and look for firmware updates under Support.
If it still doesn't pop open, you may want to set the flash in the menu settings. If that doesn't work, then your camera probably needs repair and chances are, it'll cost more than it's worth.
reply to this comment
Using an Initialize option in the menu
Since Cyber-shot cameras have different menu system layouts, refer to the instruction manual specific for your camera model.
Using a RESET button
1. Locate the RESET button on the camera.
2. Use a pointed object (like a ballpoint pen) to press and hold the RESET button for 2-3 seconds.
3. After 2-3 seconds has elapsed, release the RESET button.
Performing a manual power reset
1. Turn off the camera.
2. Remove the battery pack.
3. Remove the button-sized lithium battery.
4. Allow the camera to remain without power for 30 seconds.
5. Reinsert the button-sized lithium battery.
6. Reinsert the battery pack.
Now your camera should be back to factory default settings and the flash should automatically pop up in low light situations.
While you' have the battery out, clean the contacts with a pencil eraser. I'd also go to SonyStyle.com and look for firmware updates under Support.
If it still doesn't pop open, you may want to set the flash in the menu settings. If that doesn't work, then your camera probably needs repair and chances are, it'll cost more than it's worth.
Brenda Paro (12/21/2009)
The flash operation is depending on the mode you're in and the lighting you're under. Check the manual to see what modes (such as Auto) will fire the flash. And then just make sure you're shooting in conditions that are dark enough where the camera thinks it needs flash. If it still doesn't fire, then you have an issue with the camera.
reply to this comment
WHY DOES THE MACRO SAY INVALID WHEN I TRY TO USE IT? (LINDA0411 — 09/02/2008)
WILL NOT GET OUT OF ZOOM MODE I CANT TAKE A NORMAL PICTURE ITS TO CLOSE
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (09/05/2008)
You may have a corrupted firmware load. Try resetting the camera. This is a fairly easy procedure which involves either going into your setup menu and choosing "reset" (or intialize), holding down the menu key for 5 seconds, or, removing the batteries for a few minutes. It may be that the firmware loading got corrupted and the camera just needs to be "rebooted," which is something that turning it on/off won't accomplish. But after which, you should have the camera reset to factory default settings.
Another tip is to go to Sony's website and look for firmware updates. Download and install them.
reply to this comment
Another tip is to go to Sony's website and look for firmware updates. Download and install them.
What is so great with this camera? (joe doe — 05/10/2008)
I cannot understand why this camera is receiving such great reviews. It is a small body with a long zoom and NO optical image stabilization. It merely uses a higher ISO to try and compensate. A high ISO on a small, high megapixel image sensor will lead to a lot of noise.
Not to mention that it does not record audio in stereo (like a similar priced kodak z812is does) nor does shoot in high definition.
The lens is not even a wide angle (like it is on the 10x Panasonic tz4).
I have a feeling that the people giving this such high ratings are either first time digital camera owners or people who are fuji fanboys because based on the camera's specs and merits it is way out of its league with the competition.
I would love to hear some reasons why this camera is worth the money.
reply to this comment
Not to mention that it does not record audio in stereo (like a similar priced kodak z812is does) nor does shoot in high definition.
The lens is not even a wide angle (like it is on the 10x Panasonic tz4).
I have a feeling that the people giving this such high ratings are either first time digital camera owners or people who are fuji fanboys because based on the camera's specs and merits it is way out of its league with the competition.
I would love to hear some reasons why this camera is worth the money.
Andrew Skinner (05/10/2008)
Joe,
When compared to similar cameras with a longer zoom and high megapixel count, this camera isn't as expensive. Being that it is new, there are only 3 user reviews written on it (as of me answering this question).
As for the camera's functionality, I would personally go with something like the Canon S5 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) if I was in the market for an extended zoom camera like this. It comes with the optical image stabilization and the newer Digic II Processor.
Andrew
reply to this comment
When compared to similar cameras with a longer zoom and high megapixel count, this camera isn't as expensive. Being that it is new, there are only 3 user reviews written on it (as of me answering this question).
As for the camera's functionality, I would personally go with something like the Canon S5 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) if I was in the market for an extended zoom camera like this. It comes with the optical image stabilization and the newer Digic II Processor.
Andrew
joe doe (05/11/2008)
Thanks for the response Andrew. I agree that the price is right for this camera but honestly even at this price there are better choices like the Kodak Z812is or even Sony H3. I agree with you that the Canon S5 is significantly better but of course the price is at least $80 bucks more. I just want to know why there is so much buzz regarding this camera when the specs are really nothing to be buzzing about.
reply to this comment
Andrew Skinner (05/12/2008)
Having not used the camera, and being experienced with previous versions of the Canon S5 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) (I previously owned a S2 IS), I would pay the extra money for the Canon.
I've heard Kodak has some issues with their digital cameras in regards to build quality, so that may not be your best choice. If you like the specs on the Sony H3 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) better than this choice, I would go with that camera.
I would also recommend going into a retailer to see how the cameras feel in your hand. A shop like Wolf, Penn, or Ritz will often let you shoot a couple practice shots in the store to see if you like them. Good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
reply to this comment
I've heard Kodak has some issues with their digital cameras in regards to build quality, so that may not be your best choice. If you like the specs on the Sony H3 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) better than this choice, I would go with that camera.
I would also recommend going into a retailer to see how the cameras feel in your hand. A shop like Wolf, Penn, or Ritz will often let you shoot a couple practice shots in the store to see if you like them. Good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
joe doe (05/23/2008)
Hi Andrew,
Thanks for the reply. I agree that Canon seems to be worth the extra money but I am just really curious about why this model is so highly regarded by its owners. I actually think there may be something that I am missing out on and so that is why I posted this question to try and gather input as to why the owners of this Fuji are so satisfied especially considering the weak specs.
As for the H3... honestly I may never buy another Sony camera again after my ownership experience with an H7. The pictures are lowsy when looking at the pixel level and the hyper noise reduction scheme really is not the way that a semi pro camera should be tackling picture quality.
I know the H7 gets glowing review from users but honestly they must only be looking at 4x6 prints without even examining the pictures in detail on the computer. Either that or they have been blinded by the Sony logo.
I remember even reading one users comments that the Sony Bionz engine is the greatest thing for picture quality because the Sony DSLRs use it... guess what? The Bionz is the cause of all that noise reduction in the first place!!! If only sony would allow the user to select the noise reduction level then all the problems would fade.... knowing Sony though, they will introduce that option on a later (and higher priced) model.
reply to this comment
Thanks for the reply. I agree that Canon seems to be worth the extra money but I am just really curious about why this model is so highly regarded by its owners. I actually think there may be something that I am missing out on and so that is why I posted this question to try and gather input as to why the owners of this Fuji are so satisfied especially considering the weak specs.
As for the H3... honestly I may never buy another Sony camera again after my ownership experience with an H7. The pictures are lowsy when looking at the pixel level and the hyper noise reduction scheme really is not the way that a semi pro camera should be tackling picture quality.
I know the H7 gets glowing review from users but honestly they must only be looking at 4x6 prints without even examining the pictures in detail on the computer. Either that or they have been blinded by the Sony logo.
I remember even reading one users comments that the Sony Bionz engine is the greatest thing for picture quality because the Sony DSLRs use it... guess what? The Bionz is the cause of all that noise reduction in the first place!!! If only sony would allow the user to select the noise reduction level then all the problems would fade.... knowing Sony though, they will introduce that option on a later (and higher priced) model.
Andrew Skinner (05/26/2008)
Joe,
With only 13 user reviews (as of May 26th, 2008), I would still be cautious about saying that the camera is getting glowing reviews. Yes, the reviews are consistent, so that may help.
What do you plan on using your new camera for? That might help lead us down a better path.
Andrew
reply to this comment
With only 13 user reviews (as of May 26th, 2008), I would still be cautious about saying that the camera is getting glowing reviews. Yes, the reviews are consistent, so that may help.
What do you plan on using your new camera for? That might help lead us down a better path.
Andrew
joe doe (06/10/2008)
Andrew,
I totally agree with you that 13 reviews is not a significant sample population to draw conclusions. I was just hoping that one of those 13 would take the time to state the glories they perceive or at least discuss certain issues that I see.
As for me, well I own a Sony H7 and I just recently bought the Panasonic TZ4. I tried both out on a trip to New York so I will make some conclusions when I have the time to examine all the photographs in detail (with over a 1000 photos that is going to take some time!!).
reply to this comment
I totally agree with you that 13 reviews is not a significant sample population to draw conclusions. I was just hoping that one of those 13 would take the time to state the glories they perceive or at least discuss certain issues that I see.
As for me, well I own a Sony H7 and I just recently bought the Panasonic TZ4. I tried both out on a trip to New York so I will make some conclusions when I have the time to examine all the photographs in detail (with over a 1000 photos that is going to take some time!!).
Andrew Skinner (06/12/2008)
Joe,
Thanks for the update. I'm looking forward to hearing about the photo comparisons. Let us know when you're done going through them.
Andrew
reply to this comment
Thanks for the update. I'm looking forward to hearing about the photo comparisons. Let us know when you're done going through them.
Andrew
Stephane (07/31/2008)
Why the S1000fd? Well, I' am an owner of a Fuji S1000fd and Kodak ZD710. As far as picture quality, the S1000fd does well in SuperMacro (20mm) mode, night mode also. Why are people giving glowing reviews, well it is all metal, the Canon S5 (plastic), 10MPx vs 8MPx for the S5. Here's a link to my photos: flickr.com/photos/phi-infin... and flickr.com/photos/phi-infin... .For the functions, versatility and price I went with the S1000fd. It comes down to choice, preference, and budget. Some prefer Nikon, or Canon, Leica, etc....
reply to this comment
eghershey (07/31/2008)
I purchased the S5 because of recommendations received when I queried "what would be a good camera in that price range". I'm not convinced that it was the best choice in the $350.00 price range. I have to admit, I'm still learning more and more of the cameras functions: ie, adding vivid color, etc.
But I can't figure out why I used to get a wide angle picture in the "C" mode and now its the same "non-wide" image that all the other modes are capable of.
I do like the 40X telephoto with digital help, got some pretty nice pictures of eagles in the Grand Tetons this week, both stationary and a couple in flight.
reply to this comment
But I can't figure out why I used to get a wide angle picture in the "C" mode and now its the same "non-wide" image that all the other modes are capable of.
I do like the 40X telephoto with digital help, got some pretty nice pictures of eagles in the Grand Tetons this week, both stationary and a couple in flight.
joe doe (08/29/2008)
Stephane,
Great photos! My views on the camera are based on some experience with Fuji cameras and their non- optical stabilization. While Fuji makes some great lenses and they also have very good color, the problem I found was that many of the shots were blurry. This was due to the lack of stabilzation. If you are getting great pictures with the camera then that is wonderful, but from my experience the Fuji cameras take great pictures... but it will be 1 great photo out of several blurry ones. That is the deal killer for me.
reply to this comment
Great photos! My views on the camera are based on some experience with Fuji cameras and their non- optical stabilization. While Fuji makes some great lenses and they also have very good color, the problem I found was that many of the shots were blurry. This was due to the lack of stabilzation. If you are getting great pictures with the camera then that is wonderful, but from my experience the Fuji cameras take great pictures... but it will be 1 great photo out of several blurry ones. That is the deal killer for me.
joe doe (08/29/2008)
Stephane,
I forgot to mention... 10 megapixels are not necesarily better than 8. Most would agree that more megapix on a small sensor leads to more noise so 10 megapixels is actually a negative when compared to the Cannon.
As for the metal body... well quite frankly if you drop a camera with a metal body it will break just the same as the one with the plastic body. The metal may seem better to touch but if I can have a lighter plastic bodied camera that would be worth a lot more than the metal "feel."
reply to this comment
I forgot to mention... 10 megapixels are not necesarily better than 8. Most would agree that more megapix on a small sensor leads to more noise so 10 megapixels is actually a negative when compared to the Cannon.
As for the metal body... well quite frankly if you drop a camera with a metal body it will break just the same as the one with the plastic body. The metal may seem better to touch but if I can have a lighter plastic bodied camera that would be worth a lot more than the metal "feel."
joe doe (08/29/2008)
Hershey,
Yeah the Cannon can be a handful to the novice photographer. I too have had a hard time with all the features on my Sony h7. I still prefer it but it just takes a lot of practice to get all the finer points down.
reply to this comment
Yeah the Cannon can be a handful to the novice photographer. I too have had a hard time with all the features on my Sony h7. I still prefer it but it just takes a lot of practice to get all the finer points down.
In what conditions we use Higher ISO setting in the camera? Or How the ISO speeds related with different shooting conditions? (shirish — 04/30/2008)
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (05/02/2008)
Higher ISO settings are chosen by your camera in low light situations when on automatic. This can be problematic though as higher ISOs usually mean more noise in the image. In the good ole days of film, higher ISO (or ASA as it was called) meant a shot was "granier" as faster film speeds meant larger grains to soak up the light.
Now, in the digital world it's because faster ISO speeds mean that less light is available on the CCD to be soaked up because of shutter time. Higher ISO makes the CCD work harder and faster to grab the light, but that also means that noise creeps in.
This is also true because of of the obsession of more megapixels in camera design. And I have to tell you, usually, more MP isn't better MP because of noise. CCD chips on point and shoot cameras a smaller and as such, fitting in more pixels causes them to lose light sensivity. Sure, there’s more data on the chip, but the chip can’t absorb the light data and what it ends up with is a picture that has more noise than image quality.
So, the higher the ISO, and low light usually means a noisy picture and a disappointed photographer.
More information on ISO can be found here ( en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Film_... ).
reply to this comment
Now, in the digital world it's because faster ISO speeds mean that less light is available on the CCD to be soaked up because of shutter time. Higher ISO makes the CCD work harder and faster to grab the light, but that also means that noise creeps in.
This is also true because of of the obsession of more megapixels in camera design. And I have to tell you, usually, more MP isn't better MP because of noise. CCD chips on point and shoot cameras a smaller and as such, fitting in more pixels causes them to lose light sensivity. Sure, there’s more data on the chip, but the chip can’t absorb the light data and what it ends up with is a picture that has more noise than image quality.
So, the higher the ISO, and low light usually means a noisy picture and a disappointed photographer.
More information on ISO can be found here ( en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Film_... ).
shirish (05/05/2008)
Thank you for such valuable information
reply to this comment
How to differentiate betwwen different types of camera, viz. DSLR & Standard Point & Shoot? (shirish — 04/30/2008)
reply to this comment
steve mccall (05/01/2008)
in general, point and shoot cameras have fewer manual controls and non interchangable lenses.
dslr cameras have fewer automatic modes and give the user rmore control of the camera.
reply to this comment
dslr cameras have fewer automatic modes and give the user rmore control of the camera.
by James DeRuvo (05/02/2008)
Well, I wouldn't say "fewer automatic controls." Most entry level DSLRs have just as many auto options as they try to court the upper level point and shoot crowd away from superzooms.
But also with DSLRs you're actually using REAL glass lenses, whereas with most point and shoots, you're likely to have a high quality plastic lens. Also, with DSLRs shutter lag is practically non existent due to larger faster ccd chips. Whereas, in point and shoots is shutter lag not only a way of life, but also with smaller chips, stuffing more megapixels into them can cause more noise, particularly at higher ISOs.
reply to this comment
But also with DSLRs you're actually using REAL glass lenses, whereas with most point and shoots, you're likely to have a high quality plastic lens. Also, with DSLRs shutter lag is practically non existent due to larger faster ccd chips. Whereas, in point and shoots is shutter lag not only a way of life, but also with smaller chips, stuffing more megapixels into them can cause more noise, particularly at higher ISOs.
I would like to know about any online free photography courses available? (shirish — 04/30/2008)
reply to this comment
steve mccall (05/01/2008)
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (05/02/2008)
Dozens of options. google is your friend ( google.com/search?q=photogr... ).
I like Short Courses ( shortcourses.com/ ). They're online options are very comprehensive.
reply to this comment
I like Short Courses ( shortcourses.com/ ). They're online options are very comprehensive.
Why only 10 min. continuous movie recording with H3? Even though with 2 GB mem card the total movie recording capacity is much more?? (shirish — 04/28/2008)
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (04/29/2008)
It has to do with the firmware. Check and see if there's an update to address it.
reply to this comment
is Sony H10 digital camera pocket sized ? (vns1980 — 03/21/2008)
Is the Sony H10 digital camera small enough to be accomodated in pocket of my trouser?
reply to this comment
Aditya D (03/21/2008)
Unless you have a very big trouser pocket, no it is not. Its dimensions are 106 x 68.5 x 48.9 mm (4.2 x 2.7 x 1.9 in). Hope this helps, if you have any other questions, feel free to ask.
reply to this comment
Memory stick vs Memory SD card (cd3200 — 01/30/2008)
Which is better? The memory stick for the Sony H3 or an SD card for the Cannon SX100. The memory stick seems to be more expensive. Why?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (02/02/2008)
SD cards, hands down. The Memory stick is proprietary. Only found in SONY. That translates to higher costs and a stunted development cycle as such, they don't perform as well, IMHO, as the more open source SD variety.
reply to this comment
Larry (02/03/2008)
With Memory Stick you are stuck with Sony since it won't fit anything else. While SD isn't accepted by all other brand cameras, it is more universal and is even used on some of the newer model Fuji cameras which used to only allow xD cards.
reply to this comment
shirish (04/30/2008)
Hi,
Just additional info on different mem cards
A memory stick is Sony's brand of memory cards. Up to recently all of Sony's cameras used Memory Stick exclusively. Now the high end Sony Cameras also use the Compact Flash cards too.
The Secure Digital cards were invented by Panasonic and non-sony cameras use them. So your Sony camera will NOT be able to use a Secure Digital card.
Source: Yahoo Answers
Best wishes
Shirish
reply to this comment
Just additional info on different mem cards
A memory stick is Sony's brand of memory cards. Up to recently all of Sony's cameras used Memory Stick exclusively. Now the high end Sony Cameras also use the Compact Flash cards too.
The Secure Digital cards were invented by Panasonic and non-sony cameras use them. So your Sony camera will NOT be able to use a Secure Digital card.
Source: Yahoo Answers
Best wishes
Shirish
by James DeRuvo (05/01/2008)
Most "non Sony" cameras. Fuji and Olympus use xD cards.
reply to this comment
im having problems downloading to my pc? (jdroach — 01/15/2008)
reply to this comment
Larry (01/16/2008)
The easiest and fastest way to download is to buy a card reader (unless your PC already has one built in). They cost $15-25 for a good one, $30-35 for a better one, and $40-49 for a best one. This allows you to take the card out of the camera and place it in the card reader which is connected to your PC via the USB port, preferably a USB 2.0 port since the USB 1.1 ports are really slow. In addition, I recommend downloading Picasa2. It is free complements of Google. You can find it here picasa.google.com/download/... Picasa2 will organize your photos and also has some nice functions such as red-eye removal, exposure adjustments (especially nice for those pics which came out too dark), and other cute tricks. Picasa2 is really easy to learn to use.
If you want to download the pictures right now without having to go buy a card reader, you will need the USB cable that came with your camera. First download Picasa2, then connect your camera to the USB port with the cable. Click on the import button on Picasa2 located in the upper left hand corner of the screen. Select your pics to import or choose import all and you're off and running. If you have any difficulty let me know.
reply to this comment
If you want to download the pictures right now without having to go buy a card reader, you will need the USB cable that came with your camera. First download Picasa2, then connect your camera to the USB port with the cable. Click on the import button on Picasa2 located in the upper left hand corner of the screen. Select your pics to import or choose import all and you're off and running. If you have any difficulty let me know.
Want to buy a camera with good indoor quality and telephoto/zoom for outdoors. Please help. (carolkc — 12/16/2007)
I need a camera that takes clear indoor pictures, in addition to photos both indoor and outdoors in the distance, ie sports, my children on a stage at school, etc. So many to choose from - please help. Every time I look at a potential camera, the telephoto comments indicate loss of clarity, etc. I am looking at Sony and the Cybershot H3 keeps coming up. What do you recommend? Carol
reply to this comment
Larry (12/17/2007)
Shooting school presentations can generally be accomplished at 10X unless it is a large auditorium (and you are late for the play).
There may be occasions (especially school sports) when you will want to shoot over the heads of people in front of you. An LCD that will flip out and twist is a great advantage to frame that difficult situation. The Canon Power Shot S5is has 12X zoom, a flip out and twist LCD and takes great pictures. Check out some reviews by clicking on the "Resources" button new the bottom right corner of this page. I think you will like it a lot for your purposes.
You should be aware that shooting in low light is a general digital camera weakness (except SLR's) which may lead you toward a camera with an external flash shoe to mount a sizeable flash unit. The S5is has an external flash shoe ready for use.
Larry
reply to this comment
There may be occasions (especially school sports) when you will want to shoot over the heads of people in front of you. An LCD that will flip out and twist is a great advantage to frame that difficult situation. The Canon Power Shot S5is has 12X zoom, a flip out and twist LCD and takes great pictures. Check out some reviews by clicking on the "Resources" button new the bottom right corner of this page. I think you will like it a lot for your purposes.
You should be aware that shooting in low light is a general digital camera weakness (except SLR's) which may lead you toward a camera with an external flash shoe to mount a sizeable flash unit. The S5is has an external flash shoe ready for use.
Larry
carolkc (12/17/2007)
Thank you so much! I think this is a good choice. WIll order online today. Really appreciate the advice on the low light and the flip out features. This was a great experience. Thanks again Larry.
reply to this comment
Does anyone have a problem with the battery life on this camera? (anthos620 — 12/10/2007)
I recently purchased this camera & love all the features of it. Specifically, I was looking for a good camera with a long zoom that didn't cost me a paycheck to get it. I haven't used it terribly much, but one thing my wife & I use it for is pictures of our son (9 mos.). We seem to not get much battery out of it, though. Is this to be expected? We'll take a few pictures & then turn the camera OFF completely (leaving the battery in). The next day when you pick it up to use it again, the battery is completely drained. Is this camera specific, model specific, or something you could expect from any Li-ION?
reply to this comment
Larry (12/12/2007)
This cameras battery is CIPA rated for over 300 pictures. You experience is definitely NOT to be expected with this camera. The problem could be a faulty charger, defective battery or even something awry in the camera causing it to continue to drain the battery even after being turned off. If you purchased this from a "real store" I suggest taking it back pronto. If you are "on your own" with this problem, I would begin by charging the battery overnight. On the next day take a boat load of photos with the flash on and see how long it lasts. Charge it fully again the next night. The following day just let it sit in the camera 24 hours. Next, check it for remaining charge having taken no pictures at all. If it is drained dead, then charge it fully again overnight and then take it out of the camera and let it sit for at least 24 hours. Next, put it in the camera and check it out. Hopefully, all this testing will determine whether it is the camera or the battery. It is more difficult to determine whether the charger is acting up, but if in step one the camera only managed 50 on so pictures before going off, then that points toward either battery or charger and not camera. If the battery drains dead sitting in the camera but not when sitting on the shelf, then that points toward the camera being the problem.
Good luck and Best Wishes, Larry
reply to this comment
Good luck and Best Wishes, Larry
anthos620 (12/12/2007)
Thank you very much! Great info/tips in there!
reply to this comment
John Morse (01/01/2008)
Just to add another report of exactly the same problem, i.e. brand new Coolpix L15 which reports 'battery exhausted' when camera switched on, Try several times and you get lucky, i.e. the camera then operates OK and reports full battery (i.e. no battery warning signal on the display screen). This is for alkaline batteries and with setup for alkaline battery setting of camera. Mine is an L15 purchased in France, serial number 41002489 (would others with this problem check and poset their serial numbers please: maybe we'll see this is a limited batch problem...)
reply to this comment
ben lunn (01/11/2008)
i dont appear to have this problem with this camera's battery life and i have had cam's in the past that have had the same problem of which you speak i read up on it and apparently the worst thing to do is turn it off then on then off numerous amounts of times in the day as it takes more battery power to start up than to leave it on (obviously if you arent taking pictures of anything in awhile turn it off) but if you plan on taking a pic in lets say 2-3 mins leave it on.i know its been answered but hey theres my 2 pence :)
great camera by the way would recommend to anyone!
reply to this comment
great camera by the way would recommend to anyone!
Steve (05/22/2008)
I had a similar problem: New L15 camera with new batteries (regular alkaline type). After a few pictures, received the "Battery Exhausted" message, even after replacing with new batteries again. Called Nikon customer service. They said that their advertising/instructions about using regular alkaline batteries was "misleading", and that the more sophisticated (and expensive) Lithium, etc., batteries should be used. I owned a Nikon 35mm camera for over 15 years and was very happy with it, but looks like you can't trust even old names any more.
reply to this comment
Steve (10/25/2008)
Same problem with the Coolpix L15.
Camera came with:
* 2 x Panasonic LR6 AA Industrial Alkaline 1.5V (no longer working)
Have tried the following, which all fail:
* 2 x new Panasonic super heavy duty AA 1.5V
* 2 x new Eveready super heavy duty AA no. 1215 RGP 1.5V
* 2 x used Duracell AA MN1500 LR6 1.5V
reply to this comment
Camera came with:
* 2 x Panasonic LR6 AA Industrial Alkaline 1.5V (no longer working)
Have tried the following, which all fail:
* 2 x new Panasonic super heavy duty AA 1.5V
* 2 x new Eveready super heavy duty AA no. 1215 RGP 1.5V
* 2 x used Duracell AA MN1500 LR6 1.5V
What type of camera do you suggest for taking pictures at concerts? (elclappo — 12/10/2007)
At present I have a canon A700 but would like to get a camera that has more optical zoom and an image stabilizer? Usually I sit within the first 15 rows of a concert, so what camera would you suggest
reply to this comment
Larry (12/14/2007)
Using camcorder quidelines you would need at least 10X. Alternatively a 6X with lots of MP (say 12) would allow you to shoot and then crop and enlarge in your computer later (admitedly with loss of pixels which will limit just how much you can enlarge the shot before pixels start showing up for the party).
I agree with the IS as a must for this situation. Also, consider getting one with a tilt and swivel LCD if you do any overhead shooting by holding the camera up high in order to shoot over the person(s) in front of you. This brings to mind the Canon A650is and the Canon S5is both of which have tilt and swivel LCD's and good image stabilization. The A650is is 6X while the S5is is 12X which would eliminate the need for crop and enlarge in post processing. The S5is has 8MP which is quite sufficient given the 12X zoom. The A650is has 12 MP and you would need all of it to achieve the full zoom that you want.
I would lean toward the S5is but you need to try them out in your hands for control and comfort as well as operating the controls. Size and weight are similar but the style is quite different. Since you have used the Canon control system you will probably adapt to either of these rather quickly.
Best Wishes, Larry
reply to this comment
I agree with the IS as a must for this situation. Also, consider getting one with a tilt and swivel LCD if you do any overhead shooting by holding the camera up high in order to shoot over the person(s) in front of you. This brings to mind the Canon A650is and the Canon S5is both of which have tilt and swivel LCD's and good image stabilization. The A650is is 6X while the S5is is 12X which would eliminate the need for crop and enlarge in post processing. The S5is has 8MP which is quite sufficient given the 12X zoom. The A650is has 12 MP and you would need all of it to achieve the full zoom that you want.
I would lean toward the S5is but you need to try them out in your hands for control and comfort as well as operating the controls. Size and weight are similar but the style is quite different. Since you have used the Canon control system you will probably adapt to either of these rather quickly.
Best Wishes, Larry
elclappo (12/14/2007)
Thanks. Your opinion is greatly appreciated. Actually I am looking at the Canon S5IS as it has the image stabilization, the swivel LCD and the 12 X optical zoom. There is one other camera that I was looking at and was wondering if you are familiar with it. This camera is the OLYMPUS SP-550...It has dual image stabilization and 18X optical Zoom.
reply to this comment
Larry (12/16/2007)
The S5is wins over the SP-550 anyday: S5is has external flash shoe, Flip and twist LCD and SDHC cards and takes greatphotos. The SP-550 has a plastic tripod mount, USB 1.1 (instead of 2.0) and xD cards (which really matters most if you already have a supply of SD cards from owning a Canon). 550 advantage is the wide angle lens at 28mm.
According to the available reviews you'll want to skip the 550 and look at its replacement, the 560 which in early reviews seems to have solved at least some of the 550's problems. A close comparison between the S5is and the SP560 is required since they each have their pros and cons. Click on that "Resources" button near the lower right hand corner of this page and get going since each day you delay is another day without one of these really capable cameras!
Best of Luck to ya, Larry
reply to this comment
According to the available reviews you'll want to skip the 550 and look at its replacement, the 560 which in early reviews seems to have solved at least some of the 550's problems. A close comparison between the S5is and the SP560 is required since they each have their pros and cons. Click on that "Resources" button near the lower right hand corner of this page and get going since each day you delay is another day without one of these really capable cameras!
Best of Luck to ya, Larry
elclappo (12/16/2007)
Thank you so much... I have decided on the S5is. the next thing will be for me to learn how to use it...But once again, thank you
reply to this comment
Larry (12/16/2007)
You are very welcome for the advice and info. I'm sure you will enjoy your new camera.
Merry Christmas and Good Shooting,
Larry
PS Thanks for the points too
reply to this comment
Merry Christmas and Good Shooting,
Larry
PS Thanks for the points too
Can we zoom while in record mode? (mssurla — 11/22/2007)
Can we zoom while in record mode of H3? How is the movie quality?
reply to this comment
Subhash (11/23/2007)
Answer :
No, you can not zoom when in Movie mode.
The movie quality is ok comparing with other cameras in this range.
reply to this comment
No, you can not zoom when in Movie mode.
The movie quality is ok comparing with other cameras in this range.
Andrew Skinner (11/23/2007)
Michael,
From what I can tell in the user manual ( gdlp01.c-wss.com/gds/090000... ), you are able to use the digital zoom in movie mode (see page 224 of the user manual ( gdlp01.c-wss.com/gds/090000... )). As for the quality, I have used an older model of this camera for over 6 years, and have had no big issues with the video format. Lower light situations are harder because there is no continuous lighting function in the camera. Good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
reply to this comment
From what I can tell in the user manual ( gdlp01.c-wss.com/gds/090000... ), you are able to use the digital zoom in movie mode (see page 224 of the user manual ( gdlp01.c-wss.com/gds/090000... )). As for the quality, I have used an older model of this camera for over 6 years, and have had no big issues with the video format. Lower light situations are harder because there is no continuous lighting function in the camera. Good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
Rharrels (01/13/2008)
Andrew Skimmer, What do you mean by the SonyH3 wasn't good in low light. You say there is no continuous lighting function. Do you own this camera? If not, what camera do you reccomend. I want one with good Zoom and pixels?
reply to this comment
Andrew Skinner (01/15/2008)
Rharrels,
I was speaking to the video quality in low light situations. Without an external, continuous lighting source, you will have some issues with the video function when it it darker. As for decent zoom and resolution, this camera should be ok for you. Good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
reply to this comment
I was speaking to the video quality in low light situations. Without an external, continuous lighting source, you will have some issues with the video function when it it darker. As for decent zoom and resolution, this camera should be ok for you. Good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
How long is Li-Battery good for? (hawkeye43 — 11/19/2007)
Is re-chargable AA batteries less costly and are they as good as Lithium ion batteries?
reply to this comment
Aditya D (11/19/2007)
In the long run, I would recommend Lithium ion batteries, because in theory, lithium ion batteries last forever, if they are manufactured correctly. Most rechargeable batteries, though they claim they last forever usually last for about 500-1000 charges before starting to go dead. Also, Lithium ion batteries hold a significantly higher charge in most cases. The problem is, buying spare batteries for a lithium camera are much more expensive than buying rechargeable AA batteries, $50-60 versus $10-20. Also, if you're traveling, and either lose your battery, charger, or just run out of battery charge and don't have time to charge the battery, no matter where you are, you can probably stop by any local store and pick up AA batteries (even in Africa, I've done it), but if you run out of lithium ion battery charge, no more pictures.
reply to this comment
Cannon Powershot A650 or Sony Cybershot H3...Extended Zoom preferred ?? (stud — 11/15/2007)
Cannon Powershot A650 or Sony Cybershot H3...Extended Zoom preferred ??
reply to this comment
Matt (11/15/2007)
These two cameras are really different... the A650IS has 12MP vs. the H3's 8MP. The H3 is bigger and has 10x optical zoom, while the A650IS only has 6x.... the entire performance specs of the cameras are going to be biased in favor of the H3 because of the resolution (time between shots, continuous shooting speed, etc.).
What is it that you want in a camera? It doesn't seem like compactness is an issue. If you want to compare directly with the H3, consider looking at the Canon SX100IS. If you want a smaller camera, but still has zoom, then consider the Panasonic TZ3. I personally am not impressed with the A650IS... there's just not enough upgrades beyond the 12MP resolution to warrant spending $380 on it. For that price, you can spend less on a Canon S5IS.
Look into the Canon SX100IS and Sony H3. Both are good cameras, with good performance and picture quality, and the zoom it sounds like you're looking for. They're both SLIGHTLY larger than the Canon 650IS, and more than $100 cheaper. I would go with the SX100IS personally, because I'm not a fan of Sony and I like Canon's noise reduction and image stabilization better. They both have good video ability... I don't recall if the Sony H3 allows optical zoom, but I know the SX100IS doesn't. But the Canon picture quality is better, higher ISO's are better, and I just think it's overall a better camera. I strongly suggest checking it out and seeing what you think :)
reply to this comment
What is it that you want in a camera? It doesn't seem like compactness is an issue. If you want to compare directly with the H3, consider looking at the Canon SX100IS. If you want a smaller camera, but still has zoom, then consider the Panasonic TZ3. I personally am not impressed with the A650IS... there's just not enough upgrades beyond the 12MP resolution to warrant spending $380 on it. For that price, you can spend less on a Canon S5IS.
Look into the Canon SX100IS and Sony H3. Both are good cameras, with good performance and picture quality, and the zoom it sounds like you're looking for. They're both SLIGHTLY larger than the Canon 650IS, and more than $100 cheaper. I would go with the SX100IS personally, because I'm not a fan of Sony and I like Canon's noise reduction and image stabilization better. They both have good video ability... I don't recall if the Sony H3 allows optical zoom, but I know the SX100IS doesn't. But the Canon picture quality is better, higher ISO's are better, and I just think it's overall a better camera. I strongly suggest checking it out and seeing what you think :)
Kevin K. (02/20/2008)
If you are considering the H3 I would wait a few weeks because it is being replaced with a new model called the H10. The big question about the H10 that I haven't gotten answered yet is will it have a tilting LCD? Sony's website claims it will, but people that handled a pre-release version at the recent PMA convention say it did not. Anybody who has used a camera with a rotating/tilting LCD never ever wants to go back to a camera without one.
That is why I would choose the Canon A650 over the H3. With its rotating LCD taking pictures is a joy. For example you could have the A650 hanging at your waist from a strap, and just by rotating the LCD you can take a candid shot without lifting the camera from your waist. Have you ever needed a shot in which you needed to be 8 feet tall, like shooting over a crowd in front of you? With the A650 you just rotate the LCD and hold the camera over your head. Similarly you can set the camera down on the ground and get a shot by rotating the LCD without you having to lay down.
The A650 has far more manual settings than the H3 and you can add a smart, dedicated flash, or buy a case for underwater shooting, or add a telephoto or wide angle lens (with a converter). 6X versus 10x? The A650 has a 4X digital zoom in addition to the 6X optical zoom. With those extra pixels from its 12MP, the digital zoom doesn't have nearly the drop off in quality as others with fewer mega pixels. As such that means the A650 has an effective 24X zoom range. All in all the A650 is a great camera. That's why so many camera websites rate it among the highest of all cameras in its class.
But the Sony has a shorter recycle time between shots, is a more handsome and smaller camera. The H10 will have an enormous 3 inch LCD, while the A650 has only a 2.5. As I mentioned, Sony's website claims the H10 will have a tilting LCD. To me that is worth waiting for rather than getting the H3 which it will replace.
reply to this comment
That is why I would choose the Canon A650 over the H3. With its rotating LCD taking pictures is a joy. For example you could have the A650 hanging at your waist from a strap, and just by rotating the LCD you can take a candid shot without lifting the camera from your waist. Have you ever needed a shot in which you needed to be 8 feet tall, like shooting over a crowd in front of you? With the A650 you just rotate the LCD and hold the camera over your head. Similarly you can set the camera down on the ground and get a shot by rotating the LCD without you having to lay down.
The A650 has far more manual settings than the H3 and you can add a smart, dedicated flash, or buy a case for underwater shooting, or add a telephoto or wide angle lens (with a converter). 6X versus 10x? The A650 has a 4X digital zoom in addition to the 6X optical zoom. With those extra pixels from its 12MP, the digital zoom doesn't have nearly the drop off in quality as others with fewer mega pixels. As such that means the A650 has an effective 24X zoom range. All in all the A650 is a great camera. That's why so many camera websites rate it among the highest of all cameras in its class.
But the Sony has a shorter recycle time between shots, is a more handsome and smaller camera. The H10 will have an enormous 3 inch LCD, while the A650 has only a 2.5. As I mentioned, Sony's website claims the H10 will have a tilting LCD. To me that is worth waiting for rather than getting the H3 which it will replace.
I really liked this model.But still I would like to ask that will it be better for making video as well as audio clips.Could u please tell me that? (jamesmith — 10/29/2007)
reply to this comment
Matt (11/06/2007)
I'm kinda confused at the question. Are you asking for other cameras that may have better video quality during movie-mode... or do you just want to know if this camera has good movie mode?
This camera does 640x480 @30fps movie mode with audio. For a similar, great camera, I suggest the Canon S3IS or S5IS as well... both these cameras will let you zoom during movie mode, which is a nice feature.
reply to this comment
This camera does 640x480 @30fps movie mode with audio. For a similar, great camera, I suggest the Canon S3IS or S5IS as well... both these cameras will let you zoom during movie mode, which is a nice feature.
Canon SX100IS, Sony DSC-H3 or Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ3? (tirona — 10/28/2007)
I am trying to decide on which camera to choose: Canon SX100IS, Sony DSC-H3 or Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ3. I want a small camera that has zooming as well since I travel a lot and that would be handy. Any other choice out there besides those three and what is the difference in features between them? I love small details, besides the major ones, so any features that you think will make a difference please let me know. Any help to make a choice is greatly appreciated.
reply to this comment
Matt (10/31/2007)
Please view the answer here, you posted this several times: digitalcamera-hq.com/digita...
reply to this comment
Shrik (11/20/2008)
Canon SX110 IS Vs Sony H10?
reply to this comment
I need some help with this!! (jess0521 — 10/21/2007)
I love my new Sony Cyber Shot DSC-H3 Camera. I was wondering if someone can give me some pointers though. It seems that most of my pictures are coming out blurred even after I "focus" them. What settings should I be using? I feel like when I put it in the automatic setting, or the person setting (not sure what it is called), then if one of my kids even moves slightly, I get a distorted picture.
The other thing I am finding is that my pics are coming out rather dark, with the flash on.
I have read all of the wonderful reviews, and am thinking that I must be doing something wrong!!
I am usually pretty good with a camera and take really nice pics, so this is just baffling me!! Any advice you could provide would be great!! Thanks so much!
reply to this comment
The other thing I am finding is that my pics are coming out rather dark, with the flash on.
I have read all of the wonderful reviews, and am thinking that I must be doing something wrong!!
I am usually pretty good with a camera and take really nice pics, so this is just baffling me!! Any advice you could provide would be great!! Thanks so much!
Rich Watson (10/22/2007)
You might try googling, w/ kewords like Sony, H3, and blurred or 'out of focus'.
good luck
reply to this comment
good luck
Rich Watson (10/22/2007)
So I googled---my guess is that IS (image stabilization) is turned off. Try setting it on Sports mode.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (10/23/2007)
First thing I would do is reset your camera. This is a fairly easy procedure which involves either going into your setup menu and choosing "reset," holding down the menu key for 5 seconds, or, removing the batteries for a few minutes. It may be that the firmware loading got corrupted and the camera just needs to be "rebooted," which is something that turning it on/off won't accomplish. But after which, you should have the camera reset to factory default settings.
But often, it isn't something going wrong with the camera, it's how you're using it. If you are just pointing the camera and shooting, you will run into shutter lag with any camera. It's just a fact of life. And if someone moves at that time, you end up with the blurred image. But there are ways to combat it and speed up your camera's performance:
1. Prefocus. Hold down the shutter half way to get a prefocus of the image you're shooting. When it changes, prefocus again. This will speed up your camera's performance during picture taking since it won't have to autofocus before it shoots the shot.
2. Use faster SD cards. Yes, there are faster cards and it does make a difference in writing the image file to the card. This is especially key if you're taking multiple or burst images.
3. Fresher batteries. Use alkalines at least. But I recommend using high energy batteries designed for digital photography. Varta is a good brand. They are usually sold in camera shops, are long lasting (because they are sold in small quantities) put out alot of energy.
4. Shoot in "sports" modes when you're in situations that require action. Night or available light modes when in night time settings. These presets can help in speeding up your shots, rather than the camera taking a split second to evaluate the conditions of the lighting.
5. Go manual. If you are manually focusing, particularly in darker settings, you can constantly refocus the image as things happen. Also, the infrared does have a range and if your image is out of that range you can end up with the camera's "best guess" or infinity setting which may not help. You can also go manual on fstops and shutter speeds as well, getting more light faster when you choose.
6. Go with a shallow depth of field.
7. Pan with the action. You can create some pretty cool shots by panning with your shot, focusing on your subject. This will create the effect of your subject in sharp contrast to the blurry background.
8. Use a flash - even in day time. This will "freeze" the image and cause your subject to "pop" in the shot. However, flash is only designed for limited range and can dissipate outside of about 20-25 feet unless you're using a zoomable flash.
9. Stick with 100-400 ISO. Going higher will cause more noise/grain in your shots, particularly in darker settings.
Richio is right that shooting kids in Sports modes is a good idea. And if the IS is not on, turning it on with the camera settings menu will help ... ALOT.
And adding the flash can freeze the action and make those subjects "pop" in the picture. But if you're not prefocusing, you're allowing the camera to take it's time to focus and shoot the shot, and chances are, you lose the moment or end up with a blurry picture. Prefocusing will cut that lag time by as much as 80% and help insure you get a clear shot.
reply to this comment
But often, it isn't something going wrong with the camera, it's how you're using it. If you are just pointing the camera and shooting, you will run into shutter lag with any camera. It's just a fact of life. And if someone moves at that time, you end up with the blurred image. But there are ways to combat it and speed up your camera's performance:
1. Prefocus. Hold down the shutter half way to get a prefocus of the image you're shooting. When it changes, prefocus again. This will speed up your camera's performance during picture taking since it won't have to autofocus before it shoots the shot.
2. Use faster SD cards. Yes, there are faster cards and it does make a difference in writing the image file to the card. This is especially key if you're taking multiple or burst images.
3. Fresher batteries. Use alkalines at least. But I recommend using high energy batteries designed for digital photography. Varta is a good brand. They are usually sold in camera shops, are long lasting (because they are sold in small quantities) put out alot of energy.
4. Shoot in "sports" modes when you're in situations that require action. Night or available light modes when in night time settings. These presets can help in speeding up your shots, rather than the camera taking a split second to evaluate the conditions of the lighting.
5. Go manual. If you are manually focusing, particularly in darker settings, you can constantly refocus the image as things happen. Also, the infrared does have a range and if your image is out of that range you can end up with the camera's "best guess" or infinity setting which may not help. You can also go manual on fstops and shutter speeds as well, getting more light faster when you choose.
6. Go with a shallow depth of field.
7. Pan with the action. You can create some pretty cool shots by panning with your shot, focusing on your subject. This will create the effect of your subject in sharp contrast to the blurry background.
8. Use a flash - even in day time. This will "freeze" the image and cause your subject to "pop" in the shot. However, flash is only designed for limited range and can dissipate outside of about 20-25 feet unless you're using a zoomable flash.
9. Stick with 100-400 ISO. Going higher will cause more noise/grain in your shots, particularly in darker settings.
Richio is right that shooting kids in Sports modes is a good idea. And if the IS is not on, turning it on with the camera settings menu will help ... ALOT.
And adding the flash can freeze the action and make those subjects "pop" in the picture. But if you're not prefocusing, you're allowing the camera to take it's time to focus and shoot the shot, and chances are, you lose the moment or end up with a blurry picture. Prefocusing will cut that lag time by as much as 80% and help insure you get a clear shot.
Sony DSC H3 vs Canon SX 100 IS (Taliasocs — 10/07/2007)
I am a relative beginner who needs portability and cost-effectiveness badly enough to be debating between these two cameras instead of a full D-SLR (though I do miss traditional ring-adjusted manual focus). Use will be predominantly for landscapes (city, countryside, bodies of water), including macro shots like plant and water reflective detail, and action shots like animals in motion, at very variable lighting. I know the on-paper specs but am not skilled at translating that information in to image quality. To me, the long range of the flash, the 9-point auto-focus, and the availability of tele and wide conversion lenses and filters on the Sony look attractive, and the broader range of manual focus (vs presets), the a/s priorities (which I'm not very good with yet) and the stronger digital zoom (4x vs 2x) on the Canon look attractive. My old point-and-shoot was a Sony, so I already have batteries and a memory stick. Image clarity/detail/sharpness, and color accuracy are very important to me. My questions:
How does the Canon lens compare with the Zeiss?
Is the construction of one camera significantly more sturdy than the other?
Will the Super-Steady or the OIS offer better hand-shake blur reduction?
How does the DIGIC III compare with Sony's processor?
Any other advice would be appreciated as well.
Thank you!
reply to this comment
How does the Canon lens compare with the Zeiss?
Is the construction of one camera significantly more sturdy than the other?
Will the Super-Steady or the OIS offer better hand-shake blur reduction?
How does the DIGIC III compare with Sony's processor?
Any other advice would be appreciated as well.
Thank you!
by James DeRuvo (10/09/2007)
Canon lenses will compete pretty good with Zeiss. Optical IS is much better in keeping the image steady as opposed to a digital IS option. The DIGIC III processor is the same used in their DSLRs so you're good to go there. Don't even consider digital zoom when comparing cameras. That's a marketing ploy. When you change the focal length of a zoom lens, the subject is magnified. Optical zoom replicates the zoom of a 35mm camera. Digital zoom takes a portion of the image's data and displays it at full size, producing a magnification of the original image, similar to the effect of using a telephoto lens. However, the process is different from the magnification produced using the camera's optical zoom, and the stronger the digital zoom, the more the image will degrade.
Ordinarily, I would argue against using SONY because of the proprietary memory stick, etc. But since you've already invested in this, it would seem more sense for you to stay with the SONY option. I doubt that any edge would be more than slight to justify reinvesting in what you already have.
Finally, when trying to make a final call, it may just come down to what camera feels good in your hand. Go to a local camera store and check both out side by side, holding them, feeling their center of gravity, the balance. How it sits in your hand. That usually sells me one way or the other.
reply to this comment
Ordinarily, I would argue against using SONY because of the proprietary memory stick, etc. But since you've already invested in this, it would seem more sense for you to stay with the SONY option. I doubt that any edge would be more than slight to justify reinvesting in what you already have.
Finally, when trying to make a final call, it may just come down to what camera feels good in your hand. Go to a local camera store and check both out side by side, holding them, feeling their center of gravity, the balance. How it sits in your hand. That usually sells me one way or the other.
Nguyen Hai Nam_vietnamese (12/02/2007)
Hi Talia
I've bought Sony H3 on 22-Sept, after it's announced about 1 month. With more 1000pcs i taken during last time, i highly appriciate H3, quality is very good!
Yesterday i tested SX100IS, LCD's good too, more depth than H3 in colour, more functions and plenty of options. Can say that Canon has good technology and especially in pictures quality, very true and excellent
But, don't forget contruction of camera! You aloso know that design of camera's body very important, can you take a good sence, can you concentrate to object, can you have good spirit (comfortable) when you shooting??? It's depending on camera body which you hold!!!
In this side, Canon SX's bad! Design of buttons on this not so good, it make more difficult for you when you hold, you take and you adjust modes, it's narrow!!!
More futher, perfoming speed of SX is slow, how can you fetch a nice moment???
Hence, if you said you're beginer, let me tell you let use H3, you have more confident when you take a trip and take a view!
For your questions, let me say:
1> How does the Canon lens compare with the Zeiss?
=> Carl Zeiss is the best qualtity, it manby equivalent to LEICA
2> Is the construction of one camera significantly more sturdy than the other?
=> I said,please test it directly
3> Will the Super-Steady or the OIS offer better hand-shake blur reduction?
=> Really OIS of Canon is better Super-Steady Shot
4> How does the DIGIC III compare with Sony's processor?
Digic III is good, but you can not assume it's used in D-SLR camera, not so complete.
Further, almost of Cameras (Canon, Nikon...) use Sony's processor
Hope you enjoy!!!
Mr. Hai Nam
reply to this comment
I've bought Sony H3 on 22-Sept, after it's announced about 1 month. With more 1000pcs i taken during last time, i highly appriciate H3, quality is very good!
Yesterday i tested SX100IS, LCD's good too, more depth than H3 in colour, more functions and plenty of options. Can say that Canon has good technology and especially in pictures quality, very true and excellent
But, don't forget contruction of camera! You aloso know that design of camera's body very important, can you take a good sence, can you concentrate to object, can you have good spirit (comfortable) when you shooting??? It's depending on camera body which you hold!!!
In this side, Canon SX's bad! Design of buttons on this not so good, it make more difficult for you when you hold, you take and you adjust modes, it's narrow!!!
More futher, perfoming speed of SX is slow, how can you fetch a nice moment???
Hence, if you said you're beginer, let me tell you let use H3, you have more confident when you take a trip and take a view!
For your questions, let me say:
1> How does the Canon lens compare with the Zeiss?
=> Carl Zeiss is the best qualtity, it manby equivalent to LEICA
2> Is the construction of one camera significantly more sturdy than the other?
=> I said,please test it directly
3> Will the Super-Steady or the OIS offer better hand-shake blur reduction?
=> Really OIS of Canon is better Super-Steady Shot
4> How does the DIGIC III compare with Sony's processor?
Digic III is good, but you can not assume it's used in D-SLR camera, not so complete.
Further, almost of Cameras (Canon, Nikon...) use Sony's processor
Hope you enjoy!!!
Mr. Hai Nam
Glass PRO use...... (edward sobol — 04/28/2011)
Hi, like you say....glass is the answer !!! i`m a pro working since 1980 with Canon, Nikon and Contax........The answer to your question is : PROS use Canon and Nikon because can`t aford zeiss and Leica glasses !! beliveme....Contax and Leica are superb lens !! the matter is that buying a 50mm 1,4 for a leica you must pay about nine times what a normal 1,4 canon costs.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (12/03/2007)
I very concise review, Hai. Although I disagree that Canon and Nikon's optics aren't on par with Leica, I believe they are. I'm not saying that Leica isn't a good lens, absolutely it is, but here's a reason why pros use either Canon or Nikon ... it's the glass.
And then there's Sony's obsession with proprietary technology. Don't get me started there. Still, your review of the H3 is excellent!
reply to this comment
And then there's Sony's obsession with proprietary technology. Don't get me started there. Still, your review of the H3 is excellent!
Rohit (12/16/2007)
Hi All,
Thanks for all the reviews.
Anyone knows which one is better in terms of battery? SX100 with 2500mah or DSC h3 with the NP G1, the typical battery
-Rohit
reply to this comment
Thanks for all the reviews.
Anyone knows which one is better in terms of battery? SX100 with 2500mah or DSC h3 with the NP G1, the typical battery
-Rohit
KILI_7 (12/18/2007)
I just bought the H3 and i'm very satisfied! ictures are guite good! But the imagestabilation are really bad! It don't work like at Canon S3 IS. And movie mode was bad too coz I couldn't use zoom while recording film! :'( But the quality was good! Zoom is fast and silence but flash is very noizy!? But to normal using people this camera is really good! :D
reply to this comment
CHINGY THINGY (01/16/2008)
The H3 and SX100 IS are really nice. SX100 IS seems to have better image quality by an almost inscrutable margin except for noise and noise reduction. For low light these two are pretty crappy, but the SX100 is better. In terms of build they're both about the same, H3 is retro while SX is blocky. About DIGIC and Bionz - they are both used in DSLRs, and it's just marketing - but the H3 is faster. The SX is SLOW! in flash photography - a 4-5 second wait! For image stabilization, none will really buy you clean images at slower speeds at 10X, but they're about the same. Canon's IS is a little better, since it's older. They're both decent, but you will want to have fast shutter speed/tripod at 7x beyond. About lenses, the Canon lenses are decent, while Carl Zeiss' lenses are very good on Leica models, but not as high-grade on lower-end Sonys. Still they're quite good - just keep in mind they will have noticeable distortion shooting straight lines etc. About battery - NiMHs are more convenient (AA) but Sony's lasts long. Keep in mind the Sony takes 3 hours to charge!
reply to this comment
KILI_7 (01/16/2008)
Now I'm used my H3 really much and it's really good! It's much faster than Canon (if you use flas it's really super fast!). So I say: Buy Sony H3!! And the battery (stamina) is pretty good too... so I can take 300photos with only one load... The load time is under 3hour's..
reply to this comment
Rohit (01/16/2008)
Thanks Kili and Chingy
reply to this comment
Alok Mohapatra (01/20/2008)
Hi Experts,
I am thinking of buying SONY H9 or Cannon SX100 or Cannon S5 or SONY H3.
Please advice which one willbeb better in all aspects.
Regards
Alok
reply to this comment
I am thinking of buying SONY H9 or Cannon SX100 or Cannon S5 or SONY H3.
Please advice which one willbeb better in all aspects.
Regards
Alok
KILI_7 (01/20/2008)
Hi! Sony H9 Is like piece of shit! Pictures are awful over 100ISO, But H3 is good and it is really fast with flas(What Canon is not) Canon S5 is good too, but it is really big and heavy. It's you're choice what you want, but don't buy H9! With Canon S5 you cant use zoom while you're taking video, but with SX100 and H3 you can't. If somebody want's test photos with H3 I can send them with e-mail! :)
reply to this comment
Anna (01/28/2008)
Hi everyone, I am contemplating on buying either a Sony DSC H3 or a Canon s5 is. I`ve got my hands on several digital cameras- and I can say I liked Canon`s performance better. In terms of shifting to a level higher from the usual digicams, can I get your thoughts on which camera is better? Which camera can make better pictures, more handy to use and has faster/better image for moving objects? I appreciate your help! Thanks!
reply to this comment
KILI_7 (01/29/2008)
Like I said I think Sony is faster! And sony you can take whole memory stic full only with one button push! So you can take several pictures only one button. So if you take photos like Bird photos I think that H3 is better for that! :D So read other comments ^
reply to this comment
Nguyen Hai Nam_vietnamese (01/30/2008)
Hi my guys! It's glad to meet you here! So, the discussing is rather more, let's take some views on pictures that took by cameras above! (^_^)
Let me show some image took by Sony DSC H3 on 2 months ago (about Nov or Dec/2007)
as link:
1> img.photobucket.com/albums/... img.photobucket.com/albums/... img.photobucket.com/albums/...
reply to this comment
Let me show some image took by Sony DSC H3 on 2 months ago (about Nov or Dec/2007)
as link:
1> img.photobucket.com/albums/... img.photobucket.com/albums/... img.photobucket.com/albums/...
Alok Mohapatra (02/03/2008)
Dear Experts,
Thanks for ur reply.But still I am confuse.In some of the site,Canon S5 is ranked as No. 1.
DSC P-41 since 4 years and not satified with the outcome though I have not taken any hard copy till now but I consulted with some of the Studio photographers and they told that the print out of all canon is really good in all aspects than Sony?Is it true?
In some of the review also it has been mentioned that canon is good in Picture quality.But Sony has faster outcome and good in softcopy.
Actually I need the following
1.Good Features
2.Good Quality Print out.
3.Low time for taking the photo.
4.High in optical Zoom
5.Long Lasting
6.Light and Good Look with Good quality.
7.A camera with which I will happy to hold for another 5 years....
I am a frequent flyer from ome country to other and in the coming days i will be there in Uk for a 1 year or so.
and in that light we need a good flash light also.
So keeping all this in view,please suggest the best among Sony(H3,H9) and Canon(SX100,S5)
Thanks in Advance
Alok
reply to this comment
Thanks for ur reply.But still I am confuse.In some of the site,Canon S5 is ranked as No. 1.
DSC P-41 since 4 years and not satified with the outcome though I have not taken any hard copy till now but I consulted with some of the Studio photographers and they told that the print out of all canon is really good in all aspects than Sony?Is it true?
In some of the review also it has been mentioned that canon is good in Picture quality.But Sony has faster outcome and good in softcopy.
Actually I need the following
1.Good Features
2.Good Quality Print out.
3.Low time for taking the photo.
4.High in optical Zoom
5.Long Lasting
6.Light and Good Look with Good quality.
7.A camera with which I will happy to hold for another 5 years....
I am a frequent flyer from ome country to other and in the coming days i will be there in Uk for a 1 year or so.
and in that light we need a good flash light also.
So keeping all this in view,please suggest the best among Sony(H3,H9) and Canon(SX100,S5)
Thanks in Advance
Alok
Alok Mohapatra (02/03/2008)
Dear Experts,
Thanks for ur reply.But still I am confuse.In some of the site,Canon S5 is ranked as No. 1.
DSC P-41 since 4 years and not satified with the outcome though I have not taken any hard copy till now but I consulted with some of the Studio photographers and they told that the print out of all canon is really good in all aspects than Sony?Is it true?
In some of the review also it has been mentioned that canon is good in Picture quality.But Sony has faster outcome and good in softcopy.
Actually I need the following
1.Good Features
2.Good Quality Print out.
3.Low time for taking the photo.
4.High in optical Zoom
5.Long Lasting
6.Light and Good Look with Good quality.
7.A camera with which I will happy to hold for another 5 years....
I am a frequent flyer from ome country to other and in the coming days i will be there in Uk for a 1 year or so.
and in that light we need a good flash light also.
So keeping all this in view,please suggest the best among Sony(H3,H9) and Canon(SX100,S5)
Thanks in Advance
Alok
reply to this comment
Thanks for ur reply.But still I am confuse.In some of the site,Canon S5 is ranked as No. 1.
DSC P-41 since 4 years and not satified with the outcome though I have not taken any hard copy till now but I consulted with some of the Studio photographers and they told that the print out of all canon is really good in all aspects than Sony?Is it true?
In some of the review also it has been mentioned that canon is good in Picture quality.But Sony has faster outcome and good in softcopy.
Actually I need the following
1.Good Features
2.Good Quality Print out.
3.Low time for taking the photo.
4.High in optical Zoom
5.Long Lasting
6.Light and Good Look with Good quality.
7.A camera with which I will happy to hold for another 5 years....
I am a frequent flyer from ome country to other and in the coming days i will be there in Uk for a 1 year or so.
and in that light we need a good flash light also.
So keeping all this in view,please suggest the best among Sony(H3,H9) and Canon(SX100,S5)
Thanks in Advance
Alok
jep (04/19/2008)
Dear experts, what can you say about panasonic's new TZ5 model compared to canon's sx100? Is it worth to buy TZ5 over sx100? what i need is a camera that is compact, very good image quality, and can both perform good in low-light and daylight... If you have other suggestions please let me know...
reply to this comment
weight of camera (phume07 — 09/09/2007)
reply to this comment
Sumathi (09/11/2007)
Its 264 g without battery and 380 with battery
reply to this comment
j. armijo (09/12/2007)
Sumathi is correct. I am only converting it 264G=9.3oz 380G=13.4oz
reply to this comment
Sony Cybershot H3 Reviews
Sony Cybershot H3 Reviews by Digital Camera-HQ Users
- 1.0 out of 5
Very Disappointed
(Frankie — 11/03/2008)
This is now my second camera of the same kind. The first one I had only 1 day and the flash wouldn't pop up no matter what setting I was using. Even with the force flash, it's doesn't work. My second camera, I've had for 9 months now and it has just now started the same thing so now I've got to send it to the company for repair. I had an older model Kodak before this one and it's so much more reliable than this much more expensive camera. I am very disappointed and now irritated at this point. I DO NOT recommend this camera to anyone!!!
- 4.0 out of 5
DSC H3 without zoom during Movie Shooting
(Shirish Kelkar — 04/29/2008)
I am realy very much impressed with specifications & performance of DSC H3. But one point which I missed before buying it, that it can not be zoom in or out during you are recording a movie. Even thouh this feature can be easily found in low standard cameras of different manufacturers.
Non availability of this particular feature makes me very much disappointed. Except this the camera is BEST
- 4.0 out of 5
Nice Pt and shoot
(Matt — 04/26/2008)
We just got this camera 3 days ago and i am pleased with the image quality. also the in camera editing is awsome. the only down side is the limiting amount of options in different settings. but the 10X zoom and 3" screen are awsome. also very good distance on the flash.
- 3.0 out of 5
Not Bad
(Steven Michaels — 02/12/2008)
This is a quality camera that for the most part takes great pictures. It does tend to not do so well at higher iso, and the image stabilizer is not as good as i would like, but overall solid camera.
The user interface is fairly simple, and it had many manual settings (for those who need them). Once agin i have been right to trust the sony brand, not perfect but for $269.00, a great camera.
- 5.0 out of 5
Good all-around camera
(Cory — 02/10/2008)
I just got this camera a couple days ago. I bought it at Target "As IS" for only $147. This camera is perfect for in motion shats and thr images are clear. I eould highly recomend this camera for someone looking to upgrade their standared camera/
- 5.0 out of 5
Great Camera
(Vitali — 01/29/2008)
Just got this recently, the camera seems awesome, definately a step up from the Pentax Optio E10 (which is one of the worst camera according to this website). I primarily shoot outside, and use a tripod where needed so after it is a little warmer outside I'm gonna take it for a spin. So far i just shot inside and just looking outside my window to get a feel for it. The pictures come out nice and there's no more annoying shutter delay like on the Optio E10. I would recommend this camera, it's easy to use, has good battery life, the zoom capability seems excellent too. Over all a great experience with my 2nd CyberShot.
- 4.0 out of 5
Very Nice
(KILI_7 — 01/21/2008)
The camera is very good! But the imagestabilization(SUper STeady Shot) Is'nt so good than OIS. And Image's blur when use higer than 400ISO, but that is only a little problem, coz every little "pocket" camera have same ISO broblem. But I recommand this camera! This is my first Sony's digital camera and it's REALLY good!
- 5.0 out of 5
WOW!
(ben lunn — 01/12/2008)
well..ive now owned the camera for about an hour and its GREAT i have already got light trail photos and high shutter speed camera pics and im only a beginner and to be honest this (i have used SLR's and my parents high quality Digital cam.) and this is proberbly the best camera i have ever used Extremely easy to use seems very reliable and durable (not that i have dropped it) and its excelent value in total i payed £249.97 for the camera a 1GB mem.card and 3 years guarentee!!!!and to say im only 16 thats quite a wod of cash!and im glad with what i spent it on!!would recommend it to a novice or a Pro. it is brilliant!!
- 5.0 out of 5
This is the best camera i've ever owned
(Amanda Willford — 12/26/2007)
My boyfriend just bought me this camera and i absolutly love it there are so many options and fun ways to edit your pictures. It is so much fun. I would definatly recommend this to anyone wether your a prodressional or just want to take pictures like one!!!
- 3.0 out of 5
Sony H3, it's so great!
(hai nam — 11/22/2007)
Compact, small but it's powerful! Not only at good function but also it's look like as a pro-camera! with Adapter Ring and Hood, you can mount on more options, further you can hold it firmly to take better!!! I like it!
- 4.0 out of 5
Sony H3
(Piyush — 11/10/2007)
I bought this camera nearlly a month back.The picture quality of the camera is excellent.It performs good even in dim light.Small in comparision with other Sony H series.Excellent flash.The pictures comes clear even in complete darkness by using flash.Easy to carry.zoom is pretty good.
LCD is on the lower side,its about 1,15000.Overall a good camera..
- 5.0 out of 5
reliable camera
(Ram — 10/16/2007)
sony H3 looks to be a reliable camera for advanced amatuer photographers those who wants to take high-quality photos in every state. powerful flash,an efficient zoom capability by considering the relatively small size of the camera and other available capabilities in Sony H3 makes it reliable for you!
- 5.0 out of 5
Excellent value
(Kenneth Ng — 09/10/2007)
I was looking for a camera which could take better pictures at night and one that could perform well under less than ideal conditions. Those using the smaller compacts will know what I mean. So far, the H3 has been excellent value in my opinion, having probably one of the better flashes of any camera in the compact range. Although the flash is claimed to go up to 14m, I think it's probably ok for up to 8-10m, but which is twice as good as other compacts of similar size. It is a great all round camera for someone looking for portability but with a little more than what you get with the compacts. Highly recommend.
