Hey! You should know that this product has been discontinued. Here are our current recommended cameras in the Point and Shoot Digital Cameras category.
Sony CyberShot H5
Editor's Review
The H5 is a couple years old now, so take a look at the Sony Cybershot DSC-H50 or HX1, depending on your budget. This is what we wrote about the H5 when it came out:
Sony pushes a little further, giving their 12x optical zoom camera a nice 7.2 MP sensor, outpacing similar offerings from Canon and Kodak. In addition to beating the competition in the megapixel department, they?ve jammed on a large 3.0 inch LCD screen, easily besting the Kodak Z612 and Canon S3IS as far as display is concerned. With that extra large LCD you?ll be able to get a better preview of those tight zoom shots you?ll be taking. Sony's High Sensitivity (ISO 1000) mode and Clear RAW NR image processing ensure a crisp and blur-less final product. The manual focus and exposure modes give photographers complete control of their camera, allowing for more complex and customized compositions.
Specifications
- 7.2 megapixels
- 12x optical zoom / 2x digital zoom
- Optical image stabilization
- auto and manual focus
- auto and manual exposure
- ISO 80-1000
- JPEG file format
- movie mode
- 2 AA batteries
- 3.0 inch LCD
- Memory Stick storage (32MB internal)
- Part Number: DSCH5/Bx
- UPC: 027242679481
- Release Date: Mar 03, 2006
Shop for H5 Accessories
Sony CyberShot H5 Comments & Questions (write your own!)
url=chickenbit.com/chicken-crop... site should allow you to animate your multiburst picture
url=www.fvworkum.nl/download
I hope that helps you.
On with it, I'd have to give the edge to the Sony H line over the Lumix FZ line based on that.
HOWEVER, I don't like Sony's reliance on proprietary technologies like the memory stick. They are more expensive, slower, and you can only use them in Sony products. As such, you are forced into their technological revenue stream, rather than using what's best regardless.
Both are decently rated here. But were it up to me, I'd go with the Lumix because the quality difference isn't that dramatic to force me into the dead end of SONY's proprietary technology.
But allow me to toss another camera into the mix. I am currently testing the Olympus SP-550UZ ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) and have so far been quite pleased with the results. 7.1 MP, 18x zoom, image stabilization and some great scene based program features including a 15fps burst mode. This is great for sports photography.
It also has in camera editing features such as cropping, sepia and black/white alerations, nite modes, super macro mode for REALLY close up shots, panoramic guides for shooting multiple shots to stitch into a panarama, even a mode for shooting documents.
I'm really enjoying it. If I had to complain, however, I have found the menu structure wanting and difficult to use on the fly. But other than that, it's a top notch camera.
The H5 doesn't have a hot shoe, so you can't attach an external flash. But I think what you can do if you are really dedicated is to use an optical slave trigger with a bracket (like <a href="amazon.com/Sunpak-Digital-C... one</a>. That bracket fits around the camera and attaches to it via the camera's tripod socket, and the bracket has a built-in slave, to which you attach the flash. Then you have to set your camera to manual mode and play with the aperture settings to get the results you need. I hope that makes sense.
Of course, the purchase of the bracket plus the flash might cost more than getting your flash fixed, and may be more of a pain too, so you should call Sony about repairs on the flash and get a quote. Good luck!
*edited to add: I just found <a href="cgi.ebay.com/Auto-Flash-for... which is more or less the same thing, only it seems to be bracket and flash in one. So it seems there are options available... but I'm having trouble figuring out just how this works in conjunction with the built-in flash, and I just realized that whether or not they work may depend on what's wrong with your built-in flash. I'm not terribly helpful, am I?
Is this what you were asking?
A couple of questions:
1. Does this happen when you're outdoors in full sunlight? When the camera is in auto mode?
2. If you switch to full manual and max out the shutter speed, does it happen then?
Thanks.
I have not tried that. I will see what happens.
Thanks!
Automatic mode should do a decent job of adjusting the camera's settings to produce clear shots, but if you find that it isn't, you can adjust the ISO (higher ISO = sharper image but higher image noise), shutter speed (higher shutter speed = sharper image but also a dimmer image) and aperture (lower aperture number aka f stop = more light getting into the lens = sharper image).
Hope this helps!
Andrew
Twilight , Twilight Portrait , Portrait, Landscape , Beach , High-speed shutter and High sensitivity.
With a bit of practices, it is not difficult to shoot Sunset and pets. The preset modes are there to made photography more simple, but after a while you will be able to take pictures under all conditions with or without the help of these modes.
I would guess that the price of the H5 would go down with the release of newer cameras. Its usually what happens, but you never know.
Andrew
The external power supply ( sonystyle.com/is-bin/INTERS... ) provided as an option from Sony has a 100-240 voltage range with an output voltage in operating mode of 4.2 Volts DC. I hope this helps.
Andrew
You may log on to this site for further information :
amazon.com/Opteka-58mm-Filt...
However, Sony H5 is one of the ultrazoom cameras that come fitted with fixed lens.
As such the lens is not interchangeable and I hope you are not too disappointed that your existing minolta lens will not fit this camera.
If you are interested log on to the following site for further information :
amazon.com/Opteka-58mm-Filt...
I suggest checking out each cameras individual user reviews to find which one suites you best, but honestly you can't go wrong these are suburb machines.
Good Luck
Good Luck
Happy Birthday!
Canon PowerShot S3 IS
Canon PowerShot A640
Canon PowerShot A710 IS
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ7
Canon PowerShot A630
I am not implying that you have to have a dSLR for the safari. After all, you will be using the camera long after you get back from the trip. So the S3 is a great all-around camera.
Another route is to get the Nikon D40, a bit more money but less than $600 w/ lens. However, that lens that comes with it tops out at 55mm, so you would need a good tele for the safari as well.
I have a Canon A710. I bought it over the S3 because it is much smaller. I like to keep a camera in my pocket, rather than around my neck. But the S3 is a much nicer camera.
For kids pics shutter speed is an important factor as kids actions are very uncertain and can't be guided/controlled. if you miss the momemt, you lose it for ever ! So select your camera based on this if you know use of shutter speed. You have not mentioned in your query about how comfortable are you in using shutter speeds. S3IS has better shutter speeds - S3IS : 15 Sec - 1/3200 seconds Vs. 0.25 sec - 1/2000 seconds. However, I have been using H5 and beleive you in me 1/1000 is good enough for most applications for kids pics or even for moving cars.
Take your decision based on following factors also :
1) Out of Canon, Panasonic or Sony, which has a service centre near to you ?
2) Sony has a built-in memory of 32MB
3) Sony uses only 2 nos. batteries and Canon uses 4. Panasonic offers Lithium batteries. Sony has come out with Li-ion models also now with higher zooms of 15X & 18X
Another Sony camera that is probably better fitted is the Sony W100 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) it has everything you are looking for plus more.
Check out the user reviews, they are both excellent cameras.
Good luck!
If you're looking for an ultracompact camera with fast shutter speed, natural flesh tone, strong flash, image stabilization, wide-angle lens, long battery life, good movie quality and ability to use large-capacity memory cards, the SD800IS is a good choice, too. If you were to try this camera out in a store, I'd suggest just putting it on auto, taking a picture of a person, and notice how responsive the camera is, and how amazing the image of the person appears. Very natural coloring. Great camera.
First of all, you can find a head-to-head comparison of the Sony H5 and Kodak P712 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )'s stats here ( dpreview.com/reviews/compar... ). As you'll see, the difference between these two cameras, at least in terms of stats, is pretty slim. They have the same size sensor, the same zoom range, and they're roughly the same size and weight. The Sony has a smaller macro focal range, a larger, higher resolution LCD, more ISO options, and uses convenient AA batteries, which means you can use AA rechargeable NiMH cells. On the other hand, the P712 has Kodak's signature ease of use and uses more widely available SecureDigital cards (as opposed to Sony's proprietary MemoryStick format). Both cameras are rated very well by users and pro reviewers. The Sony generally gets higher marks for image quality, however.
If you're looking to take lots of night pictures, you should be aware that no non-SLR digital camera does terribly well in low light. Cameras in this class probably do the best out of the non-SLRs, but in low light you'll probably still see lots of image noise, and you may have some issues with "focus hunting". With noise reduction you can get some pretty good results (see this sample image ( steves-digicams.com/2006_re... ) from the H5 for an example), but you do lose a lot of fine detail.
Hope this helps!
Honestly, the P712, H5, and Canon S3 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) are the best non-SLR digitals for night shooting. If you want better night time performance, you're going to be looking at moving up to the SLR class. There are several entry-level SLRs that are around $500 (the Pentax K100D, the Nikon D40, etc), but in general moving up to this class means a big bump in price, especially since eventually you'll want to buy additional lenses, and lenses aren't cheap.
This isn't to say that you can't get good shots with the H5, P712, or S3 IS... you'll just have to fiddle with the manual mode settings quite a bit to get satisfactory results.
What do you actually mean by "see a lot of image noise"?
Thanks
Carol
Any decent camera will freeze a runner if you've got the settings right. The problem comes when the running is happening in low light, or if your hand moves while you're taking the picture, or if you can't navigate to those settings.
The P712 is more than enough camera to take crisp action shots, though. You can use its manual mode to select a quick enough shutter speed (the highest you can get while keeping the picture bright enough) and from there on it should be a cakewalk. Alternatively, you can select the automatic mode associated with sports photography (represented by an icon of a man running), which will attempt to automatically select the correct shutter speed/aperture for that kind of shooting.
I'm not sure about the printing single frames from video question, but I'll look into it further and report back.
Hope this helps.
Have you considered the H5 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )? It's smaller than the F707 (but not exactly small) and very, very powerful. It's a 7MP, 12x optical zoom (with a nice image stabilization system), and has a beautiful 3" LCD.
If you want a very small camera, you might want to consider the N2 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) (10MP, 3x optical zoom, no image stabilization, very small, limited manual settings) or the W100 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) (8MP, 3x optical zoom, no image stabilization, full manual mode).
These are all good cameras. I'd try them out in-hand and see which feels best to you.
Hope this helps!
There are many cameras these days that match or exceed the specs of the HP 945. The Fuji S5200 you've selected above is one of them. Others include the Canon S3 IS, the Sony H5, the Panasonic FZ50, and the Kodak P712.
The Canon S3 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is a 6MP camera with a 12x optically-stabilized zoom. It features a nice flip-out & swivel LCD screen, a great macro mode (can focus on things actually touching the lens), and an absolutely beautiful video mode, along with signature smooth and accurate Canon picture quality. It uses AA batteries, which means you can use rechargeable AA NiMHs.
The Sony H5 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is a 7MP camera with a 12x optically-stabilized zoom. Its LCD is fixed, but also huge and of great resolution (3" at 230,000px). Like the Canon, it uses AA batteries (though only 2, where the Canon uses 4). It uses Sony's proprietary memory stick, which might be a turnoff to some.
The Panasonic FZ50 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is a 10MP camera with a 12x optically-stabilized zoom. It's the only one of these cameras to use a 1/1.8" CCD sensor, though it needs the extra space for all those pixels (the others use a 1/2.5" sensor). It has the feel that's closest to a SLR, and size and weight to match, about 8oz heavier than the next closest. Like most Panasonics, it has issues with excessive image noise in low light, but in good conditions it can produce amazing images. It uses a proprietary lithium ion battery pack.
The Kodak P712 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is nearly identical in its specs to the Sony H5. Users seem to love it, and it's the smallest and lightest of the cameras here. It has a very ergonomic design, and trademark Kodak ease of use. Like all of the cameras here, it's capable of producing very, very good pictures. Like the Panasonic, this camera uses a proprietary battery pack.
You can get a full rundown of these cameras' specs side by side here ( dpreview.com/reviews/compar... ).
There's really no clear recommendation between these cameras. I personally love my Canon S2 IS and would recommend the S3 IS based on that alone, but the truth is that all four of these models are very comparable. I'd recommend going to your local mega-electronics store and trying as many of these as possible in your hands.
Good luck!
I did as you suggested and visited one of our mega-stores prior to posting my question...I intend on returning with your specific suggestions and trying both the Panasonic and Kodak. I tried the other two on my first visit. One thing I noticed right off was the smaller physical size than my HP. I am a man with man hands and both the Cannon and Sony you mention above felt like little toy cameras. Navigating between all the dinky little buttons and controls felt a bit awkward, a condition I suppose I could eventually learn to live with.
Can you shed any light on the Pentax K100D? I haven't found one yet to try it on for size-n-feel but all the other published characteristics seem to fit what I'm looking for.
Thanks again for you help.
The K100D ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is a very good camera--probably the best value-oriented entry-level SLR out these days (along with the K110D ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), which is exactly the same minus the in-camera image stabilization). Being an SLR, you'll be able to buy additional lenses for it, as well as external flashes and other accessories that (with a few exceptions) you couldn't use with the above cameras. The down side is, of course, price. The camera itself is more expensive than the cameras above, and then you factor in the price of additional lenses (the kit lens is good, but you'll eventually want to upgrade) and it's much, much more expensive.
Any dSLR will outclass any non-SLR digital in terms of image quality--it's just a question of how much you want to spend to get that quality.
(You might also want to check out the Nikon D50 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), which should be in a similar price range with the K100D.)
Hope this helps.
The smallest cameras you'll find with a huge zoom are the Panasonic TZ1 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), the Kodak V610 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), and the Nikon S10 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). The problem here is that the smaller you make the cameras, the harder it is to make their big zooms function well. The smallest of these, the V610, is also the worst-rated, and that's no coincidence. Smaller cameras have slower zooms, a harder time focusing when zoomed in, and tend to have much more shutter lag. All three of these cameras get bad marks from pro reviewers like dpreview.com for their shutter lag and slow/poor-focusing zooms. This is exactly the kind of problem you don't want when you're trying to shoot animals in motion on safari.
I think that you'd be much better served by choosing a slightly larger camera with better performance. If you'd like further assistance selecting a larger, better camera, please don't hesitate to let me know.
Good luck!
The cameras I listed above all feature 10x optical zooms. Strangely, the cameras of the next level up in size tend to be 6x zooms. Of these, there are several very good options available. The best of these is the Canon A710 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), which has a 6x optical zoom with a very good image stabilization system (compensates for shakiness in your hands) and a nice 2.5" LCD. It's got a very good 7.1MP sensor, too, so you'll have plenty of room for cropping if need be. Most importantly, it's a very quick performer. It's quick to focus and quick to shoot. The A710 IS is probably the best compromise between size and power.
Larger compact digitals like the Canon S3 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) and the Sony H5 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) offer 12x stabilized zooms and very quick operation, but they cost quite a bit more and are much heavier and larger.
Hope this helps a bit.
Good Luck!
Also, you could always try playing around with using manual focus, so the camera doesn't have to take the extra time to try to focus. I know I find it annoying sitting there with my Canon A70, pressing the button half-way over and over again until it finally decides it can focus on something.
These are very similar cameras; here are the advantages of the H5 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ):
-Body comes in two colors (black or silver); H2 comes in silver only
-LCD screen is one inch larger (3 vs. 2) and also has more resolution
-megapixels (which you already mentioned)
The H5 is slightly heavier and there are a few slight differences in menus (different options for White balance, etc.- nothing earthshaking). With the H5 it's my belief that you're paying extra for the LCD- not only is it larger, but the resolution is 230,000 vs. the 85,000 of the H2, and that's quite a difference. So if you rely heavily on the LCD while shooting then you may want to lean towards the H5. On the other hand, a large LCD sucks batteries and can also make the camera more difficult to manage- there is less space for your fingers. If you're unsure, I recommend holding both cameras and seeing which one feels better. In terms of images they are virtually identical.
If you go to www.dpreview.com and check out the 'buying guide' feature, there's a side-by-side option where you can put the H2 and the H5 next to each other for comparison. That's how I decided on the H5. You can learn a lot from this site. Good luck! I'm sure you'll decide on the H5.
Unfortunately, all Sony cameras only take Sony MemorySticks, and the H5 is no exception.
As to your other question, the H5 isn't really directly comparable with the A710 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )--the H5 is of a much more full-featured class of cameras. Its more direct Canon competitor is the S3 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), which has a similarly super-long, stabilized zoom and all of the manual controls the H5 has. Both are very good cameras, but I prefer the S3 IS for Canon's trademark smooth image quality and accurate colors. I also prefer the Canon's ability to take SD cards rather than the more expensive memory sticks, and its superior movie mode.
Hope this helps!
For the record, both are fantastic cameras in their own ways, but if you're looking at the H5 I highly recommend the Canon S3 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) (again, Ben beat me to this one!) because I think the image quality is superior.
Many people avoid Sonys because the memory sticks are all you can use, and they're pricey. I think that was a dumb marketing idea on Sony's part personally.
The H5 has a very small sensor, so the image quality is good enough for the ones who only want to take outside pics. Almost the same as the Canon. If you want better image quality, you should jump to non that common brands, but really better cameras.
Look for the Samsung Pro815, any Panasonic FZ (I recomend the FZ30) or the FujiFilm S9100... or the very expensive Leica V-LUX 1 (almost the double price... but if this is not a problem...............). The other ones, are almost the same price, or maybe a little more expensive... but there's huge difference.
Hope this helps you find your next camera,
Alan.
good luck 007
It's by no means a small camera and the lens isn't fast at all.
The Kodak isn't much better.
Don't get me wrong - both cameras are fine but they don't meet the 'fastest lens' and 'longest zoom' requirement.
Perhaps it would be easier to see which compact cameras have the fastest lens?
I think the Olympus 5050 (discontinued but still available online) with f1.8 lens is the fastest digital compact ever?
I managed to get a brand new unit last week and it's great.
The zoom is 3x, I think - 35 to 105.
The earlier Canon Powershots were also great.
The G5 has, I think a 4x zoom and starts at f\2 at 35mm. (It drops to f\3 at 140mm.)
Both cameras aren't small. Neither do they have ultra zooms.
If you want a super zoom, maybe get the Canon 3Si.
35mm - 420mm. Around f3.5, I think.
Hope this helps.
On the other hand....
If you are the type of person that buys a car because of its looks, you just can't beat the Canon G7 for style.
ps The Sony is on the "Editors Choices" list
The Canon G7's 10 mp, a 6x lens with image stabilized zoom and refined controls will make most users quite happy. The G7's dials and analog flavor, especially when adjusting shutter speed and aperture. Optical image stabilization combined with the f/2.8 lens means you'll do better indoors with the Canon G7, so long as you keep the ISO under 800. The Canon G7 is a very slick, solid digital camera for anyone wanting a better-built digicam that captures stunning images for over $500.
As you are new to digital cameras and probably not an expert with cameras in general, the Sony H5 should meet your needs. However, your two cameras are very different. The Sony is an extended zoom aimed at the point and shoot type user. The G7 has a larger zoom but is more aimed at the user who wants to manually control the exposure and shutter controls.
Its your decision.
These are all good choices, and they're all quite comparable with one another. My personal preference is for the S3 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), as Canon's image quality is--to me--by far the most lifelike and clear. However, I almost want to recommend you get the older S2 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), which is significantly cheaper and not that much improved on by the S3 IS. In fact, many reviewers and users liked it better.
Frankly, though, you'd do well to get any of these cameras. They all have small areas where they shine over the others (the S3 has by far the best movie mode, the P712 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) has Kodak's trademark smooth user interface, and the Sony has a huge screen) but in general they're pretty comparable. I'd suggest going in to a major electronics store and trying as many of them out in your hand as possible. That's the best way to make a choice, always.
Good luck!
Sony was a close second, I had a Sony before S3 IS for 3,5 years and was very pleased with its performance. I actually see the fact that Sony uses its own memory card as a huge plus - never did I have a problem with its memory sticks, and the very first memory card I got for a Canon died on me 3 days later, so I believe that by making their own memory cards, Sony are better able to control the quality. Unless you own or plan to own more than one camera, and one of them will not be a Sony, it's not an issue at all.
Kodak never seemed like quite a match to the other three options to me, so I eliminated it rather early on.
Olympus SP-550 UZ have an 18x ultra extended zoom. But I have no experiences with that. But I know S3 is better.
That's a pretty strange problem. Are you sure the camera hasn't somehow gotten into manual focus mode? That's the only reason I can think of that it wouldn't autofocus with a half-press, unless the problem is simply that you're pressing too hard.
i would like to know as disassembly the H5, anybody know?
mqlima@hotmail.com
What you're looking for is a camera with an Image Stabilization system (IS). Some companies also refer to this technology as VR (for "vibration reduction"). Typically this is accomplished either by gyroscopes that move the lens to compensate for movement by your hand, or by a mechanism that moves the imaging sensor (aka the CCD).
Some of the best long zoom cameras with IS systems are:
Canon's S2 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) and S3 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )
Panasonic's FZ7 and FZ50 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )
Sony's H5 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )
Kodak's P712 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )
All of these have 10x or 12x optical zooms paired with very good Image Stabilization systems.
To your definition questions: a "megapixel" is a million pixels (the tiny dots which digital photos are made up of), so the more megapixels, the larger the image on your screen and the larger you can print those images; a "SLR" is a single lens reflex camera--you can recognize them primarily by the fact that they have removable lenses and by their huge price tags--they range from serious amateur to pro equipment; the letters after model names are pretty arbitrary, but sometimes (as in the case of the S2 IS and S3 IS) they mean something... it's pretty hard to tell sometimes.
Hope this helps!
Powershot S3 IS with Image stabilization and 6.0MP, 12x Opt all for $300 on-line.
Very capable, stereo Movie mode available in any Record mode
Stills can be captured while taking movies
Includes 16:9 aspect ratio
Movie files restricted to 1 GB size
AVI movie format not as compact
No Raw file support
Cyber-shot DSC-H5 Digital Camera with Image stabilization 7.2MP, 12x Opt for $370 on-line
Responsive with a good shutter lag time, very good shot-to-shot speed
Very capable Movie mode
Very fast Multiburst mode, great for analyzing golf/tennis swings
Large 3.0-inch LCD is usable in very bright light
Very good low-light shooting capabilities
No Raw file support.
The Sony is maybe just a little better overall than the Canon. But the Canon is a few dollar cheaper.
Its your call. Have fun with the new camera.
There are several cameras that I can recommend in this range. In fact, there's a whole group of "ultrazoom" cameras that fit your criteria almost perfectly.
Among them are: the Canon S3 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) (~$370) (and the slightly older S2 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) [~$280]), the Sony H5 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) ($390), the Panasonic FZ7 (~$300) and FZ50 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) (~$500), and the Kodak P712 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) (~$380).
These are all fine cameras. I personally own the S2 IS and love it a lot. It's generally rated a little better than the S3 IS (it's pretty much the same camera, specs-wise, with the major addition of one extra megapixel). Users also seem to really like the Sony H5, but I personally have no experience with it.
Hope this helps, and good luck!
Thanks!
I'm drawing a total blank on what camera you mean by "GZ"?
The main reason the compacts have this red eye problem is because the flash is so darned close to the lens. What you could do, of course, is get a camera with a separate flash that you can mount further away, but obviously that destroys the purpose of having a compact in the first place.
I have heard that the Kodak V610 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) does a good job avoiding red eye, but unfortunately it doesn't have IS nor manual controls. That's the other problem with compacts: they often don't offer the more sophisticated controls. The Panasonic TZ1 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is another little one that does pretty well with red eye but doesn't offer the other features.
I'm not being very helpful, am I? I guess my opinion would be that at this point in digital technology, you may have to sacrifice small size in order to avoid the red eye problem and to get the controls that you want. I just can't think of anything that offers the features you mentioned but that doesn't have reported issues with red eye, at least sometimes. I totally agree with you that red eye is one of the most frustrating things about digitals. Personally, I'd be less annoyed dragging around a larger camera, so that may be your best bet. =)
The best recommendation I can make that meets those specs is the Kodak P712 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), which is a 7 megapixel camera with a 12x stabilized zoom and a very nice EVF (electronic viewfinder--you won't find any digital cameras in this range with an optical viewfinder). It has a nice built-in flash, a great 2.5" LCD, and uses a proprietary lithium-ion battery.
If you can get away from the lithium ion restriction, you could also take a look at the Sony H5 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), which uses AAs (which means you can use NiMH rechargeables).
Hope this helps!
First of all, I wouldn't recommend purchasing a Nikon Coolpix 8400 this late in the game. The camera is well over two years old at this point and has been replaced by many better cameras. The reason the prices you're seeing for it are so high are probably owing to the fact that it's no longer in production (scarcity = value, I guess).
If you're looking for a SLR-like camera, the class leaders right now include the Canon S3 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), the Panasonic FZ50 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), the Sony H5 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), and the Kodak P712 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). All of these cameras feature long (usually 12x) optically stabilized zooms, at least six megapixels, and tons of manual controls. Each is under $500. I'd check them out instead of considering the 8400. Good luck!
Within 15000 what?
Anyway, Sony doesn't offer many cheaper cameras with high zoom, but they do offer plenty with lots of megapixels. If you're looking to keep costs lower I'd recommend the W100 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), which is 8 megapixels and has a 3x optical zoom. If you can spend a little more, I'd go for the H5 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), which is bigger, has a 7 megapixel sensor, and offers a 12x stabilized optical zoom. The W100 is more point and shoot, the H5 is a more serious camera. Your pick.
Good luck!
i want a digital camera with best zoom and megapixel....
tell me the best and in lower rate...
if its possible can i buy on the installment...
Any non-SLR digital camera is going to have some issues with image noise at high ISO settings, which you're going to have to use to get crisp shots indoors/at night. The FZ50 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )/FZ30 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) are probably on par with the H5 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) in this department, possibly a little worse when it comes to noise. You can compare the noise each camera produces in low light situations here ( dcresource.com/reviews/sony... ) (H5), here ( dcresource.com/reviews/pana... ) (FZ50), and here ( dcresource.com/reviews/pana... ) (FZ30). Hope this helps!
For really effective sports photos you're probably going to have to invest in a digital SLR. That way you can control all the settings and change lenses as needed to deal with those challenging conditions (dark, faraway, etc.)
I think the clear choice for best ultrazoom camera is the Panasonic Lumix FZ50 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), which unsurprisingly has the DCHQ Editor's Choice award for Most Powerful Extended Zoom Camera. It's fast, ruggedly built, and has a feature set that no other camera in its class can match, not even the more popular Canon S3 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) and Sony H5 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) (which are both also very good cameras, no doubt).
The FZ50 has a 12x optically stabilized zoom, a very nice 10 megapixel sensor, allows for both JPEG and RAW capture, has a full manual mode to rival some SLRs, and it comes in at under $500.
Hope this helps!
Of the cameras you've mentioned, I'd suggest looking more closely at the Canon S3 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) and the Panasonic FZ50. These are the de facto class leaders in the super-zoom category, along with the Sony CyberShot H5 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). Personally, I think the FZ50 is unbeatable in its class/price range. One thing you might want to do is go to a local electronics superstore and try as many of these as possible in-hand. Many times it's the way a camera feels and handles in-hand that is the best way to decide which camera is best for you. You'll get to play with their menu systems, try their various shooting modes, see how quickly they respond, and most importantly you'll get to see the kind of images you'll get from them. You should bear in mind that inside a store, probably with fluorescent lighting, you won't get the best quality images from these cameras. These will perform best outside in good light, so when you test them out in-store, judge them against each other and not against your ideal of a good photo. Hope this helps, and if you narrow it down to two or three cameras that you're definitely interested in, you should respond back here and I'll try to give you some more specific recommendations. Good luck!
The S3 is also a good camera to "grow with"- the Canon menus are simple to use, and you can set things to Manual as you learn how to control them yourself, or just leave it on Auto and let the camera do the work. A great all-around camera.
I don't think you should have any reservations selecting the FZ50 from among its peers. It is by far the most powerful camera in its class. I myself have used it, Sony's H5 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), and Canon's S2 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) (which is by all accounts extremely similar to the S3 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), if not a little superior on the image front). The FZ50 was a pleasure to use, and felt the most solid and SLR-like in my hands. I didn't notice any problems with noise that detracted significantly from its use, and definitely not any greater noise than I saw on the other models I mentioned.
That said, under your $600 limit there are several digital SLRs (with kit lens) that you might want to consider. The Pentax K100D ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), for example, can be had for $578 (with lens) at Amazon. The Nikon D50 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) can be had for a similar price (cheaper with a shorter range lens). The Canon Rebel XT (350D) ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is also in this range. Without a lens, each of these cameras is under $500 (some close to $400) and you can probably find decent used lenses on eBay and the like. Of course, with a memory card and other accessories (not to mention inevitable extra lenses) you'll end up over $600 eventually, but it's something worth considering. Finally, the Pentax K110D ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) (same as the K100D, minus built-in image stabilization) is an incredible $432 after a $50 rebate at Amazon, with lens.
All of that said... if you want to stay out of the SLR realm, the FZ50 is a fantastic choice.
Good luck!
If you're asking about the pixels' relationship with image quality, that depends on several things. First of all, dSLRs will always provide better image quality than non SLRs because their imaging sensors are much, much larger. A typical 6MP sensor in a non-SLR, for example, is about 5.76 x 4.29mm. Meanwhile, the 6MP sensor on the K100D is 23.5 x 15.7mm (basically 4x as large). What this means is that each pixel receptor is given more room and therefore more light, which means lower image noise and the ability to capture higher quality images at high ISO sensitivities.
Furthermore, higher megapixel numbers doesn't necessarily imply better image quality. Sometimes, manufacturers will cram more pixels onto the same size sensor (for example, putting 8 million pixels onto a sensor the same size as the non-SLR 6MP sensor above). This does the opposite of what the SLRs' larger sensors do, increasing noise at higher ISO sensitivities and generally lowering image quality. The main advantage of higher resolution in consumer digitals is the ability to make larger prints.
In short, I wouldn't worry about it too much, so long as the image quality is good.
13 seconds sounds like a ridiculous exaggeration by any standard, and $130 for any 2gb SD card is a huge ripoff. I'd check sites like newegg.com or even amazon.com for much more reasonable deals. Take a look at this one ( newegg.com/Product/Custrati... ), for example.
It sounds to me like the salesperson is trying to scam you. I'd avoid whichever store that was entirely and do your shopping from reputable internet merchants. I've personally used both newegg and amazon with great results.
Good luck!
Unfortunately, there aren't really any digital SLRs out there that match your specifications. The lowest price you'll find for a new (non-clearance) SLR is $550-600. These will, if you're lucky, come with a 18-55mm lens (wide angle to mild telephoto). Unfortunately, the real sticking point here is that no (and I mean absolutely no) digital SLR includes a movie mode. This is because of the way SLRs work--a mirror reflects the image you're seeing to the viewfinder and flips up when you press the shutter release. Since SLRs have no live preview LCD, and since you can't see anything through the viewfinder when the shutter is open, you would have no idea what you're filming with a dSLR in movie mode. There's a good discussion of this problem here ( dcresource.com/forums/archi... ). So, in short, no movie modes on dSLRs.
However, there's a whole class of digital cameras that are "SLR-like", a term that's generally used in relation to their size/shape and range of manual controls. These often have huge zooms, optically stabilized lenses, tons of manual options, and so on. In terms of movie modes, the best of these is Canon's S3 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), which features 640x480 movies at 30fps. The video quality is seriously amazing, and you can zoom in and out while recording. The only downside is that video recording is limited to 1gb files, which equals about 9 minutes of footage at the highest video quality setting.
Other cameras to consider are Sony's H5 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), Panasonic's FZ50 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), and Fuji's S9000 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). Good luck!
thanks.
oh, that would not be long enough, 9 min's. i will look at the others. thanks
suzy
For christmas, i am getting my daughter a digital camera. She is a competitive horse back rider and loves to take pictures of her friends riding. She needs a camera that can be VERY fast to take a pix of a horse over the jump. The camera doesnt HAVE to fit into her pocket but it may not be humungous! The camera must have a HUGE zoom also because you are not close to the horses jumping AT ALL sometimes. I am having troubles finding a camera--even looking for one! Please help!!! ASAP for this present is for xmas and i need to ge it ASAP since we are leaving early on vacation.
Thanks so much
linda luster
If zoom is a high priority, I'd recommend the Canon S3 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) (or its slightly older brother, the S2 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )). It's got a 12x optically-stabilized zoom lens, which means that it will try to compensate for any hand movement that might happen while taking shots. In good light it can produce great images very quickly indeed. Burst mode shooting will allow it to capture images at 2.3 frames per second for well over 30 shots at full resolution--perfect for making sure you get that great shot of the horse going over the jump. It's not the smallest camera--in fact it's pretty large for a non-SLR--but it's not going to turn anyone into a hunchback either. In short, it's a great camera that gets great images on full auto, but will also allow you to grow as a photographer via its manual settings.
If you'd prefer a non-Canon camera, there are several competitive models from other companies like Sony (H5 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )) and Panasonic (FZ7, FZ50 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )). They're very nearly as good as the Canon, have a similar feature set, and carry a similar price tag. Good luck!
These are two very different cameras, but I'll try to lay out the pros and cons of both.
The Nikon D70 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is what's called a digital SLR, meaning that it uses the traditional design of film cameras, with detachable lenses and a single lens reflex system. dSLRs are traditionally far more expensive than non-SLR digitals because of their complexity, higher quality build, and superior images. Frankly, just about any dSLR is going to be better than any non-SLR digital for capturing images in low light and images of high-speed action. The D70 is by far the better camera here.
However, the Sony H5 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) has much to recommend it as well. In good light it can produce images that, to the average eye, will be indistinguishable in quality from those produced by the D70. It's several hundred dollars cheaper, and it doesn't involve the added expense incurred by SLRs when you start adding on extra lenses. If most of your sports photography will be outdoors during the day, the H5 might be the better, more cost-effective choice.
Essentially, the D70 will always produce better images, but you have to ask yourself if you want to lay out the kind of cash necessary to get one. Good luck!
If your qualification for "better buy" is a higher percentage of keepers then the D70 with a VR lens is the way to go ( get ready to pay however). If budget is the issue the Sony will come out on top, but don't expect a high frame rate under low light sporting conditions.
For an outdoor sports game, you can get some fantastic shots. Nikon has some new lower costs SLR's that will be worth of consideration, as they have a very low entry price, a decent starter lens and the ability to get that sweet VR lens that allows a clear shot under the toughest lighting conditions.
The flexibility of SLR cameras and their better value ( they don't depreciate as quickly as any point and shoot models, however these days entry level SLR cameras like the D70/50/40 have very short life spans before a new better and sometimes cheaper model is presented.
My advice- the Nikon Entry SLR or other entry SLR like the canon rebel
The cameras you've mentioned are all serious contenders, but I would say that in the non-SLR class, the clear winner is Panasonic's Lumix FZ50 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). Following that link you'll find a little debate over wildlife photography (one negative comment and one rebuttal), but overall the feature set on the FZ50 outclasses the Canon S3 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), the Sony H5 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), and the Fuji offerings by a country mile.
That said, if you want true manual control, additional lenses, and really stunning image quality you're going to want to bump up a price class to the digital SLR range. The cameras mentioned previously are all under $500 (some are even under $300). Once you step up to the SLRs, though, you're talking $600+. Of course, for your money you also get a substantial increase in quality and options.
Most digital SLRs can use lenses from film SLR cameras. This means that if you've been shooting on film with Canon lenses, you can buy a Canon dSLR and snap those babies right on. There are several new entry-level dSLRs that would appeal to the wildlife photographer. Among these are the Sony Alpha a100 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) (which features image stabilization built into the body), the Canon Digital Rebel XTi ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), and the Nikon D40 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). All of these cameras come in under $1000 with a kit lens, and all of them are compatible with their brand's film autofocus lenses (the Sony accepts Konica-Minolta lenses).
Hope this helps!
If she's a photo major and she wants to go pro eventually, you'll probably want to get her a dSLR. There are several good entry-level dSLRs on the market right now, including the Canon Digital Rebel XTi ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), the Nikon D40 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), and the Sony A100 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). Any of them would be a good start, and all are under $1000 with a starter (kit) lens. Of course, when you factor in memory cards and additional lenses you'll probably end up at or over $1000 in the long run.
If you're not into spending that much money at the moment, there are many "SLR-like" digitals that offer excellent manual controls, long zooms, and great optics. The class leader among these is the Panasonic Lumix FZ50 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), with the Canon S3 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) and the Sony H5 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) coming in close behind. All of these cameras feature optical image stabilization and 10x+ optical zoom, as well as a bevy of manual options (ISO, aperture, shutter speed, white balance, etc). You can buy adapters to fit select custom add-on lenses to these models, but they don't come close to the versatility of the dSLR's detachable lens design. They also don't match the dSLRs in the clarity of their photos or their range (low light capability, extremely low shutter lag, powerful burst mode, RAW/TIFF capability).
If it's a question of money, you can go with the FZ50 or one of its competitors and then later on, your daughter can pick up a decent film SLR used for a very reasonable price (they're dropping like crazy as digitals take over the market). If $1000 is within your range (and these dSLRs can go as low as $600 with kit lens), a dSLR is the way to go here. Good luck!
The D40 is a good entry-level digital SLR. You might also want to look into the Pentax K110D, which you can currently get at Amazon for $432 after a $50 rebate. That's $432 with a kit lens (18-55mm). It's about the cheapest deal you'll find for getting into the SLR range.
Good luck!
I intend to get the D40 very soon.
These cameras also exhibit more than I believe 7+ pixels. I do like my pixels. I also like a camera with a good amount of zoom. Lastly I would like the camera to have a video with sound. Though not as important as the other things I mentioned, it is a "want".
I am a person who likes to take pictures for fun, like at parties and such, but also to take environmental pictures. The camera that I would purchase would also probably be used for sports, and family pictures. (Once again these are just "wants" but not "musts".) So I suppose these things I have just mentioned would go under different modes for a camera. (Sports, Auto, Night, ect.)
These last things that I mention are not neccessary, but optionals. I want a camera that has easy software for a computer to print out pictures. Also that is rather user friendly.
Wow. I ask for a lot in a camera! Any suggestions are GREATLY appreciated. Also, any camera mentioned that is even close to having all of these features are better than any! Once again, thank you to anyone who gives any suggestions for a nice digital camera.
P.S. If this camera could be under about $400 or $360 that would be wonderful as well! Thanks again!
While the Sony H5 is nice, you should also consider the Canon S3IS. They are quite similar in features. Plus, Canon uses SD cards, not the Sony proprietary cards (which cost more per byte).
I also favor the Canon lenses. They are superb, indeed better than Nikon and Leica. In addition, the Canon S3 uses AA batteries, which seem to be preferable in the digital camera community. I'm not sure what the Sony H5 uses.
Picture Quality in Autofocus mode
Knowing H5 is poor for Sports/Wildlife still photos, how much is the difference?
I am not worried about video
Image Stabalization & Hunting @ 12X Zoom?
Cost Difference is not a problem
By all accounts, the Sony H5 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) and Canon S3 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) are very close competitors. Their user review averages are pretty close on most sites and even the pros have some difficulty declaring a winner between the two. dpreview.com's in-depth review ( dpreview.com/reviews/sonyh5... ) of the H5 has this to say:
"Compared to the most obvious competitors - the Canon S3 IS and Panasonic DMC-FZ7 - the Sony H5 scores highly in handling, features, overall image quality and ease of use, and only really falls short in a couple of areas; burst mode, focus speed in low light (specifically at the long end of the zoom), and the purple fringing. The Canon S3IS wins hands-down when it coes to movies, the FZ7's lens and superior image stabilization means that at lower ISO settings it still, just, rules the roost when it comes to edge-to-edge sharpness, but the H5 offers a very attractive overall package that handles better than either, and - if that's what you like in a camera - has that nice big screen to boot."
So, basically, all three of the class-leaders have slight edges over one another in certain categories, but overall there's no clear winner. One thing you might want to do in order to help you make your decision is check out these image galleries for both the H5 ( dpreview.com/reviews/sonyh5... ) and S3 IS ( dpreview.com/reviews/canons... ). Since image quality is paramount for you, this is probably the best way to decide. You might also want to visit a large electronics store, where you can get both cameras in your hands and see which one feels better. Good luck in your decision!
Like all non-SLR digital cameras you're going to have some trouble getting good night shots without decent lighting and/or a tripod. This review ( dcresource.com/reviews/sony... ), however, has some examples of night photography taken with the H5, and has good things to say about it in the lower ISO modes. It's certainly among the better non-SLR digitals when it comes to night shots.
With fireworks and christmas lights (both extremely bright), you might be able to get good shots even handheld, but I'd still recommend a tripod or monopod. Without such a helper, you'll want to set the ISO setting high, the aperture wide, and the shutter speed somewhat lower.
Good luck!
Hope this helps.
This camera should be just fine for outdoor sports shots. You might find the 3x optical zoom wanting though. Indoor shots won't be bad either with the higher ISO settings, as long as you don't need to use a flash. The effective range of the flash is approximately 0.6 to 15.7 feet. If you don't mind a larger camera, you can get an effective extended zoom ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) camera in the same price range. Something like the Sony H5 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) or the Sony S9000 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) would be great alternatives. Good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
Now,
I have seen this happen with too much light. I should be an effect that is occuring with the use of a flash at close rangers where there is already plenty of light. Alo make sure your camera is white balanced and set to an appropriate ISO. A good way to check this is to set the camera to AUTO mode and chack all the settings that the camera believes to be correct for the given situation. Then you can go to manual mode and set basically that the auto mode had but with the ablilty to fiddle. Remember you are smart than your camera. When in doubt adjust ever feature until you get exactly what you want. You own the camera. the camera doesn't own you.
So try some of that out and post back if it works out.
Good Luck
I have a couple of questions for you before I can start making recommendations.
1. What are you looking to spend? Perhaps moreso than with film cameras, the money you spend really determines the quality of photos you can take with digitals. Lower-end SLRs will run you between $600 and $1000. Prosumer cameras with fixed lenses but lots of bells and whistles will range between $250 and $600. And then there are consumer cameras like the one you already have, which can go anywhere from $100 to $500.
2. What will you primarily be using the camera for? Are you a hobbyist, or do you mainly take photos of family events or snapshots of friends, etc?
3. Do you care about size/portability? Does the camera need to fit in your pocket?
If you answer these questions, I can better help you narrow down your choices. Thanks!
The answer to your first question is about $600 and might not even be able to be that much I am trying to get my mom and uncle to split the price for my christmas. I am a student in college now so I can not aford it yet.
The answer to question two. I am definatly a hobbyist but, I also take pictures of family events and of my friends. Recently I took the photographs for my Grandparents 25th anniversary I really enjoy nature pictures but I also like taking portraits, and snapping pictures of people just walking or acting nature in a common setting. I have taken photo 1 but, this semester and the semesters following I am not going to have any time and I don't want to stop b/c I really love taking pictures. Basically I want one for everything one I can take fun pictures with and one I can put on a tripod and take pictures of the beach or whatever.
The answer to question 3 yes I care about size I want to be able to print pretty big. No it does not matter the size of the camera of coarse I dont want one to heavy to carry around hiking or whatever but it does not have to fit into my pocket just have a strap and a bag or be able to fit into a camera bag ya know.
Hopefully I made it easier for you to answer my question Thank you so much for your help.
I have three choices of cameras I have found so far maybe you can help tell me if they are good or not.
1. Canon EOS 30D
2. Canon Digital Rebel XTi/canon 400D
3. Canon Digital Rebel XT/Canon 350D
Thank you!
My recommendation in general, like when you put these cameras side by side and ask which one is best, is the <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... I am constantly amazed at the photo quality and flexibility and wish I was marrying rich so I could buy it for everyone I know. However, I can see that this is somewhat out of the price range you're thinking and it's also a pretty darned heavy duty camera for your first 'real' digital.
Because of that, my recommendation for you in particular is the <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... XTI</a>- the instruction manual is a little hazy, but in general this camera is user friendly for newbies yet gives good enough results for professionals. But, you have to promise that you'll learn how to use all the settings. It's a lot more fun that way and you'll get much better results.
I'm sure Ben will have some good advice for you too!
First of all, the cameras you've mentioned are all excellent cameras, but you'll be very lucky to get them for under $600. Any price you find under $600 is probably going to be from a shady New York-based "grey market" site--whatever you do, do not do business with them. Reasonable prices for these cameras from reliable stores are as follows: 30D should be about $1150, 400D should be about $775-800 (with lens), and the 350D can be had as cheap as the $600 mark.
These cameras are all digital SLRs (single lens reflex cameras), which means that unlike the vast majority of digital cameras, they have removable lenses, real optical viewfinders, and can snap photos just as quickly as film SLRs. They generally have very little or no shutter lag, can shoot to uncompressed file formats like RAW and TIFF, and offer advanced manual controls that no non-SLR camera can match.
They're also a serious investment, especially when you get the urge to experiment with new lenses, which usually end up costing several arms and legs. They are pretty large (larger than any non-SLRs) and they usually require a camera bag, especially if you have more than one lens.
So, what you need to do is take a step back and decide what kind of camera you really want. A SLR will provide you with unlimited potential and opportunity, but it's also a serious investment of both money (probably over a thousand, eventually, with lenses and accessories) and time (to learn all of its functions/settings and how to best use them), and it won't be the easiest to just pick up and take with you any and everywhere. If you go with a non-SLR you'll be sacrificing some of that potential for convenience. You can get any number of SLR-like cameras that are smaller, cheaper, and capable of producing very nice photos--just not quite as sharp and lifelike as their big brethren.
Cameras in this upper non-SLR range generally offer long, image-stabilized zooms, tons of manual control, and the option to fit on a select few external lenses via a lens adapter. Canon (S3 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )), Sony (H5 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )), and Panasonic (FZ7, FZ50 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )) are pretty much the class leaders, but there are also quality offerings from Kodak and Fuji. I personally own the predecessor to the S3 IS, the S2 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), which I can attest to being capable of some really stunning images.
I'm sorry that I can't really offer you a clear-cut answer here (just more questions!), but I don't want to see you saddled with a camera that isn't right for what you want and need. Hope it helps. :)
Neither the S3 IS or the XTi offer a printer dock accessory, but both are PictBridge compatible. PictBridge is an industry-standard technology that allows you to print directly from a camera to a printer (via the USB cable), entirely bypassing the computer middleman. There are hundreds of PictBridge printers and I'm not really all that familiar with them, unfortunately, but I can say from personal experience that Canon's printers are, in general, very good. Hope this helps!
It looks like your question got cut off, but based on the number of questions I've gotten on this topic, I'm going to guess that the three you were going to mention were the Panasonic FZ7, the Canon S3 IS, and the Sony H5. I suppose the FZ50 might sneak in there, or maybe a wildcard Olympus or Kodak, but these are essentially the big competitors.
And, honestly, they're all very good cameras. Each has its little quirks, and one might have a slight edge over the others in one performance category (the H5 has the highest resolution, for example), but really they're all pretty comparable.
Can you give me a more specific set of criteria for what you're looking for in your camera (and tell me if I'm right or wrong on my guesses--hah)? If you don't have any more exact wants/needs, my best recommendation is to go to your closest retailer (Best Buy is a good bet) and try each model out in your hands. It's usually the best way to figure out for sure which model is right for you. Good luck!
Actually the three i'm looking at are the fuji s5200, kodak z612 and the FZ7. The most important feature is picture quality. Obviously, by my choices, I want an extened zoom.
Ease of use and the ability to take action pics would also be nice. I appeciate any advice or other suggestion for cameras in the same price range.
thanks again
Okay, let's see... this is still difficult. All are extremely well-rated by pro reviewers and users alike. The FZ7 has the most "cred" by far, sharing its bloodline with its much-loved big brothers FZ30 and FZ50. It's even got a perfect 5-star rating over at Amazon after 37 reviews. But the other two have over 4.5 star ratings themselves.
On a tech level, they're all very comparable. The S5200 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) loses the most here as it has the fewest megapixels (by one), the smallest zoom (by 2x), and the smallest LCD (by 0.7"). Perhaps most importantly, it lacks optical image stabilization (which the other two feature), which means that at the long end of the zoom it's going to be very difficult to get clear shots without resorting to a tripod.
My personal instinct is to go with the FZ7, but honestly you should try to get your hands on both it and the Z612 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) before making a purchase. Both cameras will give you great shots and both are easy to use, so ultimately it'll be the way the camera feels in your hand that will seal the deal. I'd also recommend giving the Canon S3 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) and the Sony H5 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) a look. They both stack up well against these two, in terms of both features and price. Good luck!
I will try to get hands all of them.
chris
If your wife is a serious photographer, the camera should be about 1/2 to 1/3 of the initial budget; the first lens or two should be another 1/3 to 1/2 the budget, and assuming there's any left over, memory cards, spare batteries, flash, tripod, camera bag, airplane tickets to exotic locations and so on should cover the rest. Ok, maybe the airfare is separate :-)
If your wife is really interested in photography, an SLR digital is the first stop. There are some cameras that are reasonably good alternatives to SLRs such as the Sony CyberShot H5 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) and others. Most of the Advanced Digital Cameras ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) will take a perfectly reasonable photograph, if the conditions are right; an SLR such as the Canon 400D ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) or the Nikon D50 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) will make it possible to take a really great photo, even in less than ideal conditions. However, SLRs are certainly more of a pain to use, if only because they tend to be larger, and more expensive.
So if your wife is very interested in photography, or already has a film SLR, or is doing this as a hobby, an SLR and a good lens that fits the camera is the way to go. If she is more interested in getting a great shot, actually almost any reasonably good camera these days will do. Except at the lowest price range you'll get good print quality and if you avoid the very small cameras you'll tend to get good optics. SLRs will be quicker and more versatile, but the Advanced or the larger Extended Zoom ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) cameras will have nice features to help make for a good shot.
Look for the Editors' Choice, or if a camera has been around a few month, look for high user ratings. Few cameras are out-and-out bad these days; mostly people are giving bad ratings to cameras that fail to meet their expectations.
So with that said, consider the cameras I have mentioned, and one other, the Panasonic FZ-50 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) -- all good and well rated cameras.
If you have more details about what your wife might want, post a reply and we'll see if we can help narrow things down better.
thanks for the help
chris
Having said that, if she only wants to get one lens to start with that's a reasonable catchall for landscapes and portraits then something in the range of 18 - 75mm (approx) would suffice.
The data is included as part of the image file created when the picture is taken, but there is no specific way of having the date printed on the image that I could find. I did some research on this over the summer, and there were are couple of shareware programs that would copy the date from the image file and super-impose it on the image, and there were no online print services I could find that offered this as a service. It's odd, since a lot of people ask about printing date, but apparently no one has caught on that this is a thing a lot of people want.
So there's nothing wrong with your camera. Do let us know if you find a decent solution to this problem.
The second comment is that when you get back from the store, make sure to buy the camera online. It's very likely that you'll save money, and (believe it or not) get better terms (such as no restocking fee, and maybe even no sales tax) from the online merchants. I personally have a form of agoraphobia (fear of crowds) related to fear of big-box electronics stores with huges crowds, long lines, and sales people whose main skill is reading the tags on the product for you :-)
Im looking for sharpness in the photo with minute details of the subject and the color quality should match both..Am I asking for too much in these cameras..and please mention the disadvantages of all these 3 models(I hope you are allowed to)
I've listed the major differences in the cameras below (in the same order you have them listed above), as well as what those differences mean.
-Megapixels: 7.2 VS 6 VS 6
More megapixels will give you sharper photos. It will also allow you to print larger photos without clarity loss.
-ISO Range: 80-1000 VS 80-1000 VS 80-800
A larger ISO number will allow you to take photos in lower light situations. You can experience graininess in the photos at higher ISO levels though. Just as a note, a photo taken at ISO 200 will be twice as bright as the exact same photo taken in ISO 100.
-LCD Size: 3" VS 2.5" VS 2.0"
A larger LCD will make it easier to preview photos on the camera. Take note that this will use your batteries up faster.
All the cameras come with movie mode and sound, use AA batteries, and have both auto and manual focus and exposure settings. I would recommend purchasing rechargeable Ni-MH or lithium ion AA batteries for any of these cameras for longer battery life. Alkaline AA batteries will leave you highly disappointed. The optical zoom on all the cameras is also the same (12x). I don't recommend using the digital zoom at all, because it causes a loss in clarity to the photo. Each of these cameras can also use additional lenses if you purchase a lens adapter.
For what you want to do with the camera, I would recommend the Sony H5 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). It has the largest resolution at 7.2 MP, which will give you the most clarity and color capabilities in your shots. This is coming from a long time Canon user too.
Andrew
Also I have researched ..and have found that canon s3Is can allow you to take pics at different modes, and lets you experiment with it.
Also I want to take pics of minute parts. with zoom feature
and with clarity
Does H5 give me the opportunity to manupulate with pics and allow me different angles to shoot pictures?
Have a couple of questions here
1) If I were to choose from S3IS / H5 for better Video recording which one shall I go for - I believe as far a Video is concerned S3IS would be a better choice
2) If Im to go for a better camera as far as photo quality is concerned with different shooting modes - Please suggest me which is the better one overall S3IS or H5? Please provide your suggestions too? Thanks in advance
I've only used Canon's for video and have been extremely happy with them. As for shooting in different modes and experimenting, both cameras have manual functions. All and all, I would pick the Sony H5 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) over the Canon S3 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) because of the greater resolution and the wider ISO range. Good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
According to several professional reviewers, the shot-to-shot time on the P72 is "less than two seconds even at the largest image size and highest quality" with the flash off. That time is pretty comparable to current non-SLR digital cameras. For example, the new Sony H5 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), three years newer and a class higher than the P72, takes 1.4 seconds between shots with the flash off.
I have a couple of questions for you in order to better answer your question. First, is the camera slow only when using flash, or with flash off as well? Second, has it gotten slower over time, or has it always been this slow? Third, if you can, please attempt to time the shot-to-shot time and report it back here.
Thanks!
1- The shot to shot time (when I take the picture and when the picture comes back on the screen to be able to snap again, is 7 seconds.)
2- My husband thinks it has gotten slower over time (we have had it for 3 years)
3- The shutter time has also decreased. When you press the button down, there is a delay (example, if you think about it as a clock, when you press the shutter button down, it is 9, but by the time it actually snaps it would be 12.)
4- There is no difference with the flash on or off that we have noticed.
Thank you for your time!
I honestly don't know why a camera would slow down over time. Usually, with electronics, they simply stop working altogether. Since this camera is fairly old, I'm assuming it's no longer under warranty. It'd cost you a considerable sum just to get Sony to look at an out-of-warranty camera, so that's not really an option--you'd be better off just junking it and buying a new one at that point.
Does the camera take that long to shoot if you half-press the shutter release to focus it first? Usually, even with older cameras, if you pre-focus and then press the shutter release the rest of the way, there is almost entirely negligible shutter lag.
I'm really stymied on this one, but if I think of anything I'll post back here. Good luck!
I tried some lithium AA batteries instead of my rechargeable, and it worked like a race car.
I have the Canon S2 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) which I have used to get some great artistic shots (here ( ic3.deviantart.com/fs10/i/2... ) and here ( ic3.deviantart.com/fs10/i/2... )). I have used a lens adapter for wide angle and extended zoom shots as well. Its a great starter camera for getting into artistic photography.
Andrew
All of the above choices offer similar features (long zoom, image stabilization, manual modes, etc) and similar prices. The Canon S2 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) and S3 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) are my personal favorites, and of the two I think the S2 IS is the better value (the S3 IS doesn't really add that many features that the S2 didn't already have and it costs $100 or more extra).
The Sony H5 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) and the Panasonic FZ7 are also fine cameras and stack up pretty well against Canon's offerings. Frankly, the differences between them aren't great enough to pick a clear winner, so I'd suggest going to your local electronic superstore and checking each out in-hand. Best Buy, for example, usually has tons of models powered up and ready to shoot. By doing this, you can get a better idea of how each handles and feels in your hand.
Good luck!
The <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... is yet another entry in a rapidly growing field of SLR-like consumer cameras with extremely long, stabilized zooms. By all accounts it's a fine camera, and most users seem to like it very well.
As to whether 6 megapixels is enough... the answer to that question really depends on what you want out of the camera. Above a certain point (a point somewhere around the 5 megapixel mark), tacking on more megapixels doesn't really matter in terms of how the image looks on your computer. Since most computers have a desktop resolution no higher than 1600x1200 pixels, the images produced by a 5 megapixel camera (2592x1944 pixels) are larger than any consumer monitor can actually display. In other words, they'll always have to be compressed to fit on your monitor. On the other hand, if you want to make large prints of your photographs, megapixels matter very much. The more megapixels, the larger and higher quality the prints you can make. A 6 megapixel camera makes very nice 10x6.5" prints at 300dpi, and you can stretch them another few inches without significant quality loss. This chart ( design215.com/toolbox/megap... ) shows you what print size each megapixel level will achieve at 300dpi.
As I said, there are lots and lots of ultrazoom, image-stabilized cameras these days. You might want to check out similar offerings from Canon (<a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... IS</a> and <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... IS</a>), Panasonic (FZ7), and Sony (<a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... and <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... before you settle on the Kodak. Good luck!
Is these Options Available In SONY H5?
Thanks For Your Information Link.
The Canon <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... and <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... IS</a> will do quite well with outdoor action photography in good light. The long, stabilized zoom would be very helpful with shooting airplanes in flight, though you may find their focus lag to be a small bump in the road. In my experience (I own an S2 IS), they take up to half a second to "lock on" to their subject if it's a significant distance away. You'll have to learn to anticipate your shot a little, something you wouldn't have to do with a film or digital SLR.
The picture quality, however, is fantastic, and they both have tons of manual control features to help you get the best out of your rig.
There are several cameras that are similar to the S2 and S3 (huge, stabilized zoom) that you might want to consider. Panasonic offers their Lumix FZ-series (<a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... and Sony offers the CyberShot H-series (<a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita...
If your Minolta SLR is part of the "Maxxum" line, the lenses will fit on Sony's new SLR digital cameras, notable the Sony Alpha a100 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ).
Megapixels are often used sort of unscrupulously by advertisers to hook consumers. While it's true in general that more megapixels is better, they aren't the end-all-be-all of digital photography. First of all, in recent model years many manufacturers have turned to a practice called "pixel cramming." This means that when they release a new model, they simply force more pixels onto the same size sensor chip, which results in higher digital "noise" in the pictures. However, the right resolution paired with a correctly-sized chip will of course result in beautiful pictures. The principal advantage of higher-megapixel cameras is the ability to make large prints of photos while retaining fine detail, and this is crucial for the kind of landscape photography you're talking about.
I think that zoom is more important than megapixels here, though. Mega-zoom cameras (generally 10x optical or greater) truly allow you to get up close and capture that detail that the megapixels will eventually record. You want to make sure that you stay away from digital zoom, as it will distort your pictures far more badly than any pixel cramming ever could. Look for cameras with large optical zooms paired with quality lenses. Additionally, many manufacturers offer cameras with stabilized zooms, meaning they compensate for your hands shaking or other environmental issues in order to produce a sharper image. I myself own a Canon Powershot S2 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), which features this kind of technology, and I can tell you that it works spectacularly well.
I'm going to assume that you're not interested in going pro with a digital SLR. Outside of the pro realm, there are really three main options for high-MP, stabilized long zoom:
the Canon S line (S2 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), S3 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ))
the Panasonic FZ line (FZ4 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), FZ5 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), FZ30 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), FZ50 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ))
the Sony H line (H2 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), H5 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ))
All of these cameras have their minor pluses and minuses, but in truth they're all fine machines and all of them would suit your purpose. These are all semi-bulky, SLR-like cameras. You haven't stated here whether you have a preference as to size, but there are also smaller cameras that have similar megapixel and zoom ratings. The reduction in size usually comes at the cost of a reduction in features (fine control over camera settings, etc). Some of these smaller cameras include the Nikon Coolpix S10 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) and the Panasonic Lumix TZ1 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ).
Excellent questions, thanks.
If you are looking to not spend as much and maybe what a camera that is a bit more user friendly I would recommend the Sony H5 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) it has the features you are looking for without the price of the Canon, granted it isn't as fast or as customizable. Just another option if you weren't sure about using a dSLR.
Check out the amazing user reviews yourself. I honestly feel it is one of the best cameras out there. Great middle market machine.
I noticed you haven't marked a Best Answer... are you still looking for help? If so, I recommend re-submitting your question at digitalcamera-hq.com so it has a better chance of being noticed. Lately questions are being answered within just one or two days. Good luck!
It is a 6 megapixel camera, but sensors are not growing much in point and shoots, just the megapixels and that means (in a nutshell) more sensor noise. What good is a larger image if it is noiser and has to be reduced in quality to eliminate that noise ?
The camera battery in the S3 is the same as the Rebel XT so if you ever move up to the Digital SLR the batteries will be interchangable.
I also like the feel of the S3 in the hand. It has a great and most comfortable grip and is light enough not to be obtrusive when shuffling around in a crowd.
Don't get me wrong, I'm also a sony owner (of a DSC-R1 and 2 Sony Alphas), but I have found the Canon series of point and shoot cameras to be of high quality and even though you are gaining a megapixel out of the Sony, I'm not convinced that will gain you much in resolution and image quality. I like the noise reduction system and image processing engine on the digic series chips. The end result is amazing images. Most people looking at my images don't know they were shot with a point and shoot.
That is the ultimate compliment.
Thanks
Dee
To get the closest zoom with the best clarity, I recommend using just the optical zoom. The Canon S3 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) has 12x optical zoom as does the Sony H5 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). You won't see a differenence in the optical zoom in these cameras.
Andrew
The Sony H5 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) excellent zoom and advanced picture quality.
The Panasonic Lz3 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) which has amazing features for an affordable price.
and The Kodak v610 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) which truely is FULLY LOADED.
(guitar solo)
Thank you
Yes you can fit any lens on this as long as it has the same physical specifications i.e. the threading and diameter. I have bought Opteka wide angle lens (with micro lens) which is half the price of lens offered by Sony. However, Sony is Sony ! Seeing your question, it is obvious that you too are not a professional and I feel Opteka should be good enough for you. Its available at amazon.com
Trust your questions is answered.
this may sound like a dumb question..
I have H5 now I'm taking little further steps into photography. Is it possible to fit an tele lens to H5 which i can later use with DSLR(I may/will buy some time later).
So that i can use the same lens now with h5 and later with DSLR..
If possible wat lens i can buy?
thanks
Regular SLR (single lens reflex) cameras have the ability to completly remove the lens and put on a replacement.
These simple add on lenses for this type of H5 camera are still effective at a lower cost. I believe the H5 uses a 58mm thread. This is the diameter of the mount on the end of the Sony H5 camera's lens. If you want a filter or telephoto or macro (not micro) lens you need to be sure it is made to be added on the front of the fixed camera's lens. You would not buy a lens made to fit a Sony SLR. It wouldnt mount into the H5. Also it will need to be 58mm diameter mount. If your new to this be sure to ask the clerk or take the camera with you and test that it fits and works. "Works" means that you can see thru it and it does what its supposed to do. telephoto....wide angle.....macro focus (real real close for bees flowers etc).
Great choice in camera from an old SLR buff whose had many many cams and lenses.
To read great reviews go to steves-digicams.com/
Recommendations?
Based on those criteria, the S3 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) (a fantastic camera, no doubt) is out, since it only allows video files up to 1gb in size, which is equal to roughly 9 minutes at the highest quality setting. It's a shame, too, because the video quality on the S3 IS is pretty much unmatched in the still camera market. The 640x480 @ 30fps video setting is smooth and clear and basically looks great. Furthermore, the camera's image stabilization system is still active while filming, and you can also zoom during recording. Finally, you can take full resolution photographs while filming without disturbing the quality of the video. You can see a sample of the video quality here ( dcresource.com/reviews/cano... ).
The Sony CyberShot H5 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) will take as much video as you can cram onto your memory stick, and it will also do it at 640x480 @ 30fps. At this quality setting, you'll get about 12 minutes per gigabyte. Like the S3 IS, you can zoom while taking video, which is a handy addition. You can see an example video here ( dcresource.com/reviews/sony... ).
The Panasonic Lumix FZ50 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) also records at 640x480 @ 30fps, and in addition it offers a widescreen (16x9) mode. Like both of the cameras above, the FZ50 allows you to zoom while recording and includes active image stabilization. 1gb of storage space will get you between 9 and 11 minutes on the FZ50, and it will record as long as you have room left on your memory card. Here ( dcresource.com/reviews/pana... )'s a sample video.
In my opinion, the S3 IS produces by far the best quality video, but it does it at the cost of huge file sizes (though not that much bigger than the other two) and a nonsensical 1gb file size limit. You can, of course, record as many 1gb files as you can fit on your card, but that won't work for most people. The FZ50's video quality is subpar, with far too many artifacts and evidence of compression. Given the qualities you're looking for, I think the H5 is the best combination of recording time and quality.
Hope this helps!
Thanks for the reply. Appreciate you taking the time to clearly describe each camera and its pro's and con's.
I agree with your recommendation but I really like the Canon so I think I will hold for a couple of month. The S3 was release in Jan 06. I am hoping for an S4 with 8 to 10 mp and no limit on the video in Jan 07.
thanks again.
I've got my fingers crossed for your un-crippled S4. :)
Max budget for the camera : $400
Unfortunately, since about the beginning of 2004, Nikon has significantly backed off on their production of "super macro" lenses for their CoolPix line. There are only one or two models that dip even close to the 1" focal range (the CoolPix 4800, most notably, has a 1/3" range), but those are either severely outdated or hampered by other defects that keep them from coming near the top of their class.
There are, however, options from other manufacturers. Most notably, Canon has recently come out with several models with a super macro mode that allows you to essentially touch the subject to the lens glass (for an effective 0" focal length). Models that make use of this capability include the S2 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) and S3 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), which are pretty much top of the line in several other areas as well. The higher-end models in Canon's A-series (A700 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) and up) also offer an impressive macro mode at about 1/3" (1cm) focal range. The Sony CyberShot H2 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) and H5 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) also offer this functionality, well under the 1" range.
Hope this helps a bit!
If you let us know what kind of photographer you are (do you know a lot about cameras, do you want something easy to use, etc.) and what kind of sports events you're shooting we can help point you to the right camera.
RED EYE IS ALSO BAD, AND TRYING TO TAKE ACTION SHOTS, WELL FORGET IT. THANKS YOU FOR YOUR INPUT.
CIAO!
Here are the links:
digitalcamera-hq.com/digita...
The Sony H5 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is a great action and sports camera with lots of features. It is easy to use and has good low light functions is high ISo ratings. you will be pleased. It is my best suggestion.
I noticed you haven't yet marked a "Best Answer"... are you still looking for help? If so, I recommend re-submitting your question on digitalcamera-hq.com so it has a better chance of being noticed. Lately it looks like questions are being answered within just one or two days. Good luck!
Some cameras do not offer the digital zoom because it is not built in (SLR cameras do not offer it at all). Digital zoom kicks in when the camera lenses are at their maximum capability for zoom (the longest focal length of the lens). The digital zoom then digitally enhances the image, which will distort it the larger you make the picture. It works very similarly to zooming in on a photo on your computer. I never use the digital zoom on my point and shoot cameras because of that distortion. I hope this makes sense for you.
Andrew
How does optical zoom work?
A digital camera that offers optical zoom works the same way as a zoom lens on a traditional camera. A traditional lens works by collecting light rays and projecting them onto a piece of film, or in the case of a digital camera, onto the sensor. The distance from the lens to the point where all of the light rays are in focus (focal point) is known as the focal length of the lens.
Unlike a fixed lens, a zoom lens has several moveable glass elements inside. By adjusting these elements, the focal length of the lens can be changed. Adjusting the focal length both changes the view distance and reduces the field of view, causing the projected image to appear larger.
a zoom lens has several moveable glass elements inside. By adjusting these elements, the focal length of the lens can be changed. Adjusting the focal length both changes the view distance and reduces the field of view, causing the projected image to appear larger.
How does digital zoom work?
Unlike optical zoom, digital zoom works by scaling up the pixels in the final image after it is captured. This is very similar to cropping and resizing your picture in your favorite paint program, except that the camera does it for you.
Finding a super compact camera with a three inch LCD screen can be tough. The Sony N2 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) does fit into your specifications. It is a 10 megapixel camera with a 3 inch LCD. For steady shots, it comes with internal image stabiliztion, and has expandable memory with Memory Stick storage devices. The fastest speed Memory Stick will help you take pictures in more rapid succession as well.
Andrew
I noticed you haven't marked a response as "Best Answer"... are you still looking for help? If so, I recommend resubmitting your question at digitalcamera-hq.com so it has a better chance of being noticed. Lately it looks like questions are being answered within one or two days. Good luck!
1. video and still options
2. durability for many students using the equipment
3. sophisticated enough to get into control adjustments (f-stop, aperture, shutter speed, etc.)
4. able to make movies
5. USB port to use with Mac OS10 computers
6. use video and stills with Mac imovie, powerpoint, indesign and photoshop elements
I noticed you haven't marked a response as "Best Answer"... are you still looking for help? If so, I recommend resubmitting your question at digitalcamera-hq.com so it has a better chance of being noticed. Lately it looks like questions are being answered within one or two days. Good luck!
It weighs almost nothing and is extremely comfortable to hold.
I have very small hands and I don't find this bulky at all.
A cheaper camera that is also great for sports photography but lacks many of the customizable options of the Sony is the Panasonic Lumix TZ1 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). It has 10x optical zoom and image stablization as well, but will not perform as well with high speed shots and low light situations, so that must be taken into consideration.
Both great images come from these cameras. You can't really go wrong with either one. Check out the reviews yourself on the individual camera pages.
Interestingly, the Kodak is rated at <a href="imaging-resource.com/PRODS/... shots per charge</a>. So with rechargeables in the Sony it may actually be better than the Kodak in terms of battery life.
I am already feeling it was a better choice. All cameras will have their pros and cons but
it sure costs alot of $$$$$ to figure out :( Still hope Sony will come through for me on the H-5.
The Panasonic Lumix TZ1 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) has all these same features but it can't print as high quality images. But this is a great camera and much better for a brief case size you say is so important. It is probably your safest best.
Both great cameras though!!
Optical zoom, my friend. That's what you want to focus on.
So Kandie, you seem (I think), to be interested in a camera that does not require additional lenses and has really good zoom. I think your best bet would be either the Sony H5 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) or the Canon S3 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). Check them out, I think you'll find them to be superior cameras and exactly what you're looking for.
Kandie
[url=digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... Lumix FZ50 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )
Sony Cybershot H5 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )
I'm sure there are others too. If you want, you can go to our list of extended zoom cameras:
digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... just check each one individually for a viewfinder. But the ones I've mentioned are a good place to start.
Olympus SP510 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )
Panasonic Lumix FZ50 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )
Andrew
I think this year's crop of cameras is just a little better than last year's, and those better than before in the whole "speed" issue. So going with a new camera that's similar to your Dad's might be all you need. Any of these cameras under $400 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) are a good bet, but consider the Canon A710 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) or the very well rated Sony H5 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). They are two different cameras: you'll probably get better speed with the Sony, but it's also a somewhat bigger camera. Also look for faster (higher number) ISO and image stabilization, both of which can help deal with low-light situations.
But there's one thing to consider that has made all the difference with my older point-and-shoot camera: I used to hate it because it was so slow. But there's a trick: the half-shutter-press. Hold the shutter button down half-way until the camera locks on focus and exposure, then follow the subject (with button still half-down) until you get the shot you want, then finish the shot. It's the focus and exposure part that takes all the time, even in the best cameras.
Finally, the really inexpensive cameras are still slow. And don't go for extra megapixels if you don't need them -- I cannot understand why the manufacturers are putting 10MP sensors in regular point-and-shoot cameras -- how many 20x30 prints do you make? :-)
The Sony H5 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) does have a movie mode option. Looking through the reviews on Digital Camera HQ ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) does show some comments about improved lag time for taking pictures over other cameras. Hope this helps.
Andrew
The Canon a710 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is a great camera but if you want some real zoom power I would go for the Sony H5 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )
Are there any other cams i could consider?
Actually now that I think about it I guess they are a bit different the black one must get hotter more quickly in the sun because the black absorbs heat rays where as the silver one would refect the sun light considerably. Hmmm...interesting question. But no there is no mechanical difference at all.
It will also be my only camera, so I'm looking for something well rounded.
I've looked at so many in the $300-400 it is becoming overwhelming.
For indoor shots like that from a distance, you're going to need something with a higher ISO setting (800 up). Make sure you have a steady hand as well to avoid blurring of your shots. Make sure you have a good amount of optical zoom too; the digital zoom won't help you in your search. You might look at the cameras in the $345 to $390 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) price range. The Kodak EasyShare P712 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) and the Sony CyberShot H5 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) are both viable options for what you're looking for.
Andrew
if u really love photography n willing to go out of town just 2 njoy photography...if u r ready 2 spend time on clicking each single pic...then u wud wnt a slr.
I already answered this in the other thread, but I wanted to add: if you're unsure what memory to get, BestBuy.com has a neat memory feature. Just find your digital camera on their site, and click on the link in the description that goes to the Memory Center. Then you enter your camera's make and model and it gives you a list of all compatible memory that they carry. You don't have to buy it there; this is just a good way to know what you can use.
Hope that helps!
Shutter delay is a big concern. Is the Sony H5 the best sub-SLR option? Is shutter delay a problem for SLR cameras? Should step up to a SLR for shooting kid's sporting events?
Thanks!
I sympathize, I'm a 35mm holdout too.
The absolute fastest shutter response in a digital camera is going to come from a DSLR, like the Nikon D80 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), which has a remarkable 80 millisecond shutter lag. Those cameras are high end but if you're truly interested in a quality camera with fast response (as well as tons of other features) that may be the direction to go.
As far as the Sony H5 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), it has a shutter time lag of about .4 seconds, which is decent but may not be the best on the market. <a href="impulseadventure.com/photo/... is a chart</a> that I find very helpful; it lists shutter lag time (and start-up delay) of some popular cameras and gives you an idea of what's out there for comparison purposes.
I hope that helps!
I'd say for the money, a DSLR is definitely a better choice. Look into the price comparison with a nikon D50 - and it's not a huge stretch (especially if you can find refurbished for ~$450 with kit lens like I did), and the DSLR will allow you an assortment of lenses. the 50's only 6.1 mpx, but ask any pro and they'll tell you megapixels don't matter at all. I've shot with a D50 as a backup to my D2x on shoots and had professional results.
as for shutter lag charts, those are misleading, I think (have you ever had 0.1s delay on a point and shoot?). I think the numbers for point-and-shoot cameras represent when every other camera process is set manually beforehand - that is, you've focused, set aperature/shutter, and all that's left is, well, pointing and shooting. In reality, we all know the 2-3 second delay during which point-and-shoots have to read the scene, get ready ... get ready ... aaaaaand ... shoot - whereas DSLRS are nearly instant even on full auto. I'm sure the rest will get there, too; just not yet.
The Sony H5 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is reported to have an excellent shutter time, so you should not have problems with shutter lag... it is a pretty high quality camera in terms of reaction times and quick shots. It has some stabilizing features that help prevent blur even when you're shooting rapidly, so those should help you.
You should be aware that this camera will take a few seconds to extend its lens and 'warm up'- no longer than any other digital camera, but if your grandkids are running around you may want to have the camera already on before they do anything cute. =)
Also, keep in mind that it will take a few fractions of a second to lock focus, and there is a delay of about a second between each picture. In the world of digital cameras this is considered excellent, so even if you're planning on rapid-fire shots this camera should suit your needs just fine.
You don't have to use rechargable batteries, but definitely avoid alkaline batteries. They can't really handle the demands of most digital cameras. NiMH rechargables are probably the most economical and will yield the best results.
For the Sony H5, Sony recommends that you use 2 AA "2500 mAh" NiMH batteries. Using these, the H5 will give you ~340 shots before they need to be replaced/recharged.
The only reason you would lose your shots if your batteries went dead would be if you were using a camera that used internal memory rather than a separate memory card. Some very low-end digital cameras (those in the thirty to fifty dollar range, I would estimate) operate this way. With those cameras, since the images are stored on the camera itself, the battery going dead would lose the images. As long as you're using a memory card your photos are safe even if the camera goes dead.
accessories.us.dell.com/sna... the Sony H5 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), it seems that it is only compatible with the Memory Stick Duo/ Pro Duo.
This is a highly recommended camera with tons of custom features, macro capabilities, and excellent color and picture quality. And it is much less then you budget and you know what that means, more to spend on accessories, yay!!!
OK - just bought the Canon Digital Rebel XT.. I have 10 days to return it.. I am NOT an expert but have been wanting to learn how to take great candid shots of my family! I think the Canon might be too much of a camera for me?! I currently have a Sony Cybershot too 3x and was looking to upgrade. Since I already have a Sony, I've been looking at the Sony h5, too... I love to take photos of my family, cloes-ups and the ability to blur out and focus on certain items in a shot.. Do you think the H5 will fit the bill better?! Will it be able to focus and blur effects wihout too much technical knowledge?! I also like that H5 can do movies .... HELP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The Canon is a great camera though and if you decide to keep it I am sure you will be happy.
I have narrowed my choices to the Sony H5 and the Canon S3IS. The S3IS reportedly has wonderful movie capablities.
I am a Nikon 35mm holdout and have always been impressed with my Dad's Canon camera.
Let us know what you decide!
The "fps" is frames per second. 15 will look a little choppy but isn't terrible, 30 is good, and 60 is better than standard TV. 30 will be fine, I think.
The dimensions are the number of pixels wide and high that are recorded. "VGA" is 640x480. It seems like Sony uses "Fine" to mean 30fps and "Standard" to mean ~15fps.
For the Sonys, The maximum movie length in fine mode is 25 minutes with a 2GB Memory Stick Duo. It does have audio. Here's a link to the <a href="esupport.sony.com/US/perl/m... user manual</a>.
For the <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... S3 IS</a> the <a href="alpha02u.c-wss.com/inc/Appl... user manual</a> specifies a maximum clip size of 1 hour or 1GB which depend on the quality level of the movie (and the size of the card, of course). 30 fps is plenty. It does have audio.
I also wasn't able to determine a maximum clip size of the Olympus, but can confirm that it does have audio (search for "microphone" in the online manual ( olympusamerica.com/files/SP... ).
Bottom line: either the Canon or the Sonys are a fine bet.
If you did want to look at an ultracompact, the Panasonic TZ1 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) has 10x in a really astoundingly small body.
You might also want to consider the Kodak V610 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) a really light, stylish camera with 10x optical zoom.
If you have any other questions, feel free to ask.
The Sony Cybershot H5 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) takes 2 AA batteries, so you can stock up and not have to worry about finding compatible outlets for a charger while in Africa. The 12x zoom and optical image stabilization should provide fantastic shots from long ditances as well. The H5 is a user favorite, with a great score of 4.6/5. Check out the reviews of people who own it here ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ).
If you want to browse more, you can see other cameras with long zooms that take AA batteries on this page ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ).
Hope this helps!
The S3 IS is a good camera, don't get me wrong, and certainly it's a little less expensive, but for the purposes you're describing, I think the H5 would suit you well.
Ciao!
For this reason I would now suggest the Sony H5 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). It is simplier but still very powerful, better for a beginner or young adult.
Some film cameras had a mechanism to do something similar and actually record the date/time on the film (often in a part of the film out of the actual picture). In a way, this is similar to what digital cameras do: the picture is an image file, usually a "JPEG", and in addition to containing the picture information, it also contains extra information such as what shutter speed, aperture, other settings, camera model ... and date and time. This is called EXIF data and it goes along with the file, which is great. A am pretty sure no digital camera would actually "mess up" the picture by putting the date on it, when it doesn't need to, since the date is readily available.
Printing the date on the picture is something you might do when you actually get the picture printed. Some printers that have PictBridge support ( canon.com.au/about/press_ro... ) provide the option of printing the photo date stamp on the picture. Oddly, none of the online printing services, or a couple of the photo editing software provide date stamping prints as an option. I found one shareware progam called Visual Photo Time Stamp ( sharewareconnection.com/vis... ).
Therefore, my advice is to start practicing with a digital SLR camera. Some suggestions:
If you want to have a value-for-money overall system, make sure the camera body has shake reduction hardware built in (like Sony DSLR-A100). It allows you to purchase multiple lenses without shake reduction.
Of course you may choose a body without shake reduction (like Canon Digital Rebel series), but then you end up purchasing expensive lenses with shake reduction in each lens, or a system without shake reduction at all (the basic kit lens for the Rebel leaves you with a system without shake reduction which is not bad at short focal lengths, but attempts to shoot blur free at 400 mm - which requires a different lens anyway - without a tripod and without shake reduction may only be successfull in bright sunlight).
Just my $0.02
Brgds., Aad
digitalcamera-hq.com/digita...
sonystyle.com/is-bin/INTERS...
Going with the S2 IS could save you some money (check the link above), too. Don't feel like you absolutely have to buy the latest version.
1. S3 is 6 MP while S2 is 5 MP
2. ISO setting in S3 is different than that of S2
3. Canon claims that S3's shots are sharper
The Sony H5 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). The H5 seems superior, specs-wise, to the S5200 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )
That said, I think you'll find that you can get them for cheaper than you think. Click the links I posted above and you'll see.
I mean that is, what we say, earth and sky...
The difference is soooo big that i wouldn't waste words for Fuji 5600 !!!!!
H5 DEFINITELY !!!
If You have money for it...
I am looking forward for some fine snaps. But IT IS TOO MUCH batery hungery!
If you're really interested in taking photos in low-light or high-motion situations, the upgrade may make sense. Otherwise, if you're reasonably satisfied with your FZ30, I don't know that an upgrade would be worth it.
Let's say I can sell my old FZ30 and buy a new FZ50 and make no net-loss from the exchange. Should I buy the FZ50 or look for another option that perhaps is better in the same price-range? I prob. wont go into dSLRs for now so that's not an option.
Best regards,
Emil
and the 50 is beter considering the iso ' and the imege .
the intelegnt iso working very good .
exelant imeges.
the FZ50 is good in that:
a. It focuses well and quickly
b. Produce great details in good lights, which is a vital factor for a DC
c. very good lense and performance
There is some regrets:
a. burst rate is 2 instead of 3 with FZ30. This is important for sport pictures
b. saving is slow in raw mode
c. noise level is high in low light
If you have a fz30, it is no need to trade in for a 50, but for one who do not have, it is very good to have a fz50.
I live in China and am a senior amateur
Nikon got a late start in the digital camera business, and their older models were, eh, not so great. But recent models are getting good reviews from users, for example the Nikon S6 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ).
Sony got an early start in the consumer oriented cameras, and have had a lot of winners. Their latest hotshots are the H5 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) , the Sony T10 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) and their new SLR, the Sony Alpha a100 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) all seem like great products.
Sony is new to the still photography industry and has to improve its products for taking professional quality photographs
Hi Guys,
I have seen that there are some wonderful folks on this website who are willing to help out with all our doubts, well I am looking for 1 at this moment to make my decision.
Well I have been scouting for a extended zoom camera for the couple of days and I looked at the reviews of most of them, what it boiled it down for me was that 3 cameras stand out in the reviews and specs. <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... style="font-family: Arial">Fuji FinePix S9000 Zoom</span></strong></a> , <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... style="font-family: Arial">Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ30</span></strong></a>, <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... style="font-family: Arial">Sony CyberShot H5</span></strong></a> I went to the stores and handled all the 3 cameras I loved the 3" lens on the Sony and the image quality is not that bad, can't say much about the Panasonic because the sales person was pushing me towards the Fuji all the time, he took some pictures at macro level and it just floored me the far off objects were not bad either.
Now I leave it in your expert hands to help me out with my purchase, I know there a lot of reviews out there but all of them say that the camera they have purchased is the best.
Please guys I depend on your frank opinion.
Thanks</span><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"> </span>
So go with the voices of the people: they concur that the H5 and DMC-FZ30 are great cameras (their ratings are amongst the highest of all cameras). The S9000 is a good choice. One important difference: FZ30 has a maximum ISO of 400 whereas the H5 goes up to 1000. That's 1-1/2 stops extra low-light shooting. Panasonic has just released the [url=digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... which is an upgrade to the FZ30 and getting good reviews, and it has a much higher ISO setting -- 3200, although at a steeper price.
So if price were a factor, I would go with the Sony. There. I said it. (I have a long-standing grudge against Sony because of their silly memory stick format, which seems very "betamax" to me. But that's just me. _).
Tom
Why wasn't the Canon Powershot S3IS mentioned? Isn't it
the same class?
I am looking at cameras like Sony H5 or Canon S2IS..etc...my question: is there any other camera out there that runs on battery packs? Know what I mean? I guess I will just have to charge the batteries myself if I get either of the above cameras. right?
Look for the model of the A/C adapter, and see if you can find a compatible battery pack. For example the Sony H5 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) uses the AC-LS5K adapter and the Canon S3 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) uses the CA-PS700 AC adapter. But I looked on B&H Photo for battery packs ( bhphotovideo.com/bnh/contro... ) and found them mainly oriented around SLRs. Chances are that a battery pack that supplies the correct voltage and amperage, and also has a fitting that is the same size as your camera would work, but I don't know.
You might compare these with other Extended Zoom Digital Cameras ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ).
Panasonic also makes some great cameras. You might consider the new Panasonic FZ50 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) which people seem to like a lot.
Note that with high resolution cameras, people sometimes find that images look flat (one reviewer of this camera may be having this issue). The single most important thing you can do before printing is to select the correct printed size of the picture, THEN use your photo editor to digitally sharpen the image.
I must have read 200 reviews on the H5 and Panasonic, the H5 seems to have better imaging and satisfaction all around and I really like the idea of the 3" LCD. Now, I just have to hold one to get the feel and see what I think. I had been thinking about a Pentax DSLR, since I have a 35MM and a couple lenses but think the Sony may better suit my needs for now. I can wait till the K10D get a few reviews under its belt before thinking about adding a DSLR to my list. Again, I appreciate the help.
Perry
Hope this is of some help.
I want a new camera and I'm not sure if I should get a Sony Cybershot N2 the Panasonic Lumix FX9 or the FX50. Pqanasonic has a wide angle lens and a good the zoom is best on the FX50 and the ISO is great but the reviews are better for some reason on the FX9, even though the ISO is only 80-400, the pixel are less . People seem to also love the Sony N2, the zoom is only 3X, and I love my zoom, so this seems limited. Which
Neither the DSCR1, or entry level SLRs like Canon 400 have image stabilization. But it hurts very little with SLRs, as SLRs have very good high ISO performance. So when you need to take snaps with high zoom, or under low light conditions (camera shake is a threat under these circumstances), you can actually increase the ISO, and make do with a faster shutter speed, which decreases the effect of camera shake.
Now DSC R1 too, has very good low noise performance, but not as good as an entry level dsrl (see the comparisions on dpreview). I suppose if camera shake is a big problem, then go for either a DSRL, or some of the other prosumer cameras, like DSC H5, or Canon S3 IS. But these, mind you, won't give you the 28mm wide angle the DSC R1 gives you.
Most of the shots will be still need zoom.
* long zoom (10x or better, image stabilization recommended)
* tripod mount on the camera and a tripod
* manual settings for exposure and focus
* polarizing filter
Many cameras (and lenses) offer image stabilization, and this is a really great feature. But if you are taking photos of anything relatively stationary (flowers, sunsets, waterfalls, etc.) a tripod allows you to not worry about shutter speed, meaning you can get the best from your lens. Also, nothing is as steady as a good tripod; handheld shots are almost never as perfectly sharp as tripod shots. Tripods are a big pain in the neck, of course, so image stabilization is a good fallback for cases when you don't have the tripod.
A polarizing filter is the single filter that I think most outdoor photos need. By reducing glare, polarizers make most colors, including leaves and sky look rich and saturated.
Is you are serious about photography, I would recommend an SLR, or one of the top end SLR-like advanced cameras. Of course they cost a lot more than many of the very good middle-of the pack advanced cameras, and SLRs also tend to be larger.
At the top end consider the Canon 30D ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) or it's less expensive sibling (just released), the Canon 400D ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) or the Panasonic FZ50 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ).
In the middle, consider the Sony H5 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) or the new Canon A710 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ).
For less money, you can get an older Panasonic FZ5 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ).
Here are a few choices:
digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... digitalcamera-hq.com/digita...
Sony CyberShot H5 Reviews
Sony CyberShot H5 Reviews by Digital Camera-HQ Users
- 2.0 out of 5
This camera has 2 AA batteries. If you re charge them and start taking pictures, after 30 + pictures with flash you will end up re charging. I look like a stupid running around to find the charger in middle of a party at my home.
I have Sony cameras for long time and I like them. But this one... it's a NO NO.
- 4.0 out of 5
I have found the camera takes beautiful pics, and is very user friendly. I have loved everything about it. But................just a month after the one year warranty ran out, the pre-focus feature stopped working. (You know, when you press shutter half way down to focus, then push all the way down to take the pic) I'd have to push shutter button all the way down, then camera would focus and take picture. By then the subject was gone!
Anyway, I Googled this issue and found it seems to be a common problem with these cameras. I talked to Sony; they denied knowing anything about it, said they don't believe reviews or online forums. I finally had to send camera away, cost well over $100 to fix problem. 6 months later, it's happened again. Now I have to decide if I want to repair it again, and know it will probably keep happening, or do I get a different camera.
Strange thing is, when I first bought the camera, right out of the box the pre-focus didn't work. Thinking it was just a fluke, and not knowing what I know now, I took it back and exchanged it. If only I had known...............
- 4.0 out of 5
We purchased this camera mostly for taking pictures of wildlife, like birds and scenery. One particular feature that attracted us to this camera was the ability to add conversion lenses (sold separately). We have purchased the telephoto lens and we really see the difference that that lens makes. We love the quality of the photos. The detail that shows is breathtaking. We actually took an excellent picture of the moon and can see amazing details in it.
The only thing we don't necessarily like about it is the size of the camera itself. It is not sleek and slim like many digital cameras on the market, but those cameras tend to not have the zoom capabilities that this camera has. Also, if the H5 were not designed as it is, the option to add the conversion lenses would not be possible. It is a trade-off, but we are definitely very happy with our purchase.
- 4.0 out of 5
I bought my H5 a few years ago, which was a huge step up from my first digital camera before that. Overall, I love my Cybershot. I would consider myself to be an amateur photographer and this camera performs well. The pictures come out crisp and clear with tons of options. I must say as far as the battery life goes, I have used different rechargeable batteries in my camera, with Sony batteries being the best. They last way longer than the others I've tried. I have quite totally figured out the manual focus on my H5, but I haven't used it much either. Overall, great camera for the price!
- 5.0 out of 5
It is a great camera with a lovely 12 x zoom some times it works as a telizooming I beeing a forest officer in KASHMIR INDIA I found it a great companion during my field tour
- 5.0 out of 5
I have never owned a digital camera but I jumped into this one wherre angels fear to tread! And I have never had so much fun. I knew nothing about this camera or its specs, knew nothing about photography and now I am finding new features on my Cyber-shot daily. I have bought zoom and wide angle lenses...I have hopes to do excellent work. Amaze your friends and be the first on your block! An excellent camera and you can afford it on credit.
- 5.0 out of 5
I am more than happy with this product! It makes real nice clear pictures, auto focus works very good, has a lot of professional settings when you need it, has flexible spot focus for best results, best flash in class of ultrazooms. It does even more than I expected.
In addition it compatible with lens attachments and filters, so you can get almost professional results for better price. And it has a strong solid body. I dropped it on the asphalt and nothing happened (I do not suggest to repeat my experiment) =)
- 4.0 out of 5
I recently used this camera on vacation and had to carry a large supply of rechargebale batteries as well as a charger. The camera does take quality pictures but I find that the batteries need to be replaced after about 50 pictures,
- 5.0 out of 5
Viewfinders are becoming a thing of the past in digital cameras, replaced by increased LCD screen size and smaller camera bodies. Since I like viewfinders for many uses, I was really disappointed during fairly extensive camera shopping.
Most cameras with viewfinders have such small ones as to be useless for composition, and also have gone to electronic viewfinders with poor resolution. To "see" and preview an artistic shot through them is nearly impossible.
I wanted a sizable viewfinder in my digital camera, not just a LCD screen, and the H5 was the best in its class. You're still looking through an electronic viewfinder rather than an optical one—a definate step down—but the H5's is easily the clearest resolution among its competitors.
It took me a while to find the adjustment wheel under the eyepiece (at first, I thought my camera was defective), and occasionally have had to re-adjust it (takes just an instant). But I'm generally very happy with it, given its poor competition from other cameras of its class and virtually all camera brands and models cheaper than it.
On a bright day, it's the viewfinder that is my first choice. And with my eyesight no longer 20-20, I don't have to hold the camera a ways away to focus on the LCD screen, particularly if I'm taking a lot of photos.
I still use the LCD for many shots, and it's terrific as well, both for shooting and for review.
The steady shot feature has also been very successful for me. I've just returned from a vacation in Asia, and I'm stunned at how clear my telephoto shots are, or my regular shots when I zoom in on them on the computer.
Like some users, I have experienced my thumb nudging the zoom button every so often when I have the photo framed just so, and it's annoying. But the zoom works very fast, so to re-correct the setting only takes a second. It's a learned behavior to keep the thumb off, I suppose.
When traveling, I found just about all camera cases cumbersome, since I like to have my camera with me nearly all the time while on vacation. I used to like my small digital camera which would fit on my belt and I wouldn't have to have something dangling from my shoulder all the time. For the trip, I finally settled on a snug fanny pack, which I padded with a sock in the bottom. It kept the camera secure, quick to retrieve, and kept me hands free. I don't imagine my method to be great for everyone, and I do have a camera case for when the camera is not going to be on a day-long outing, but it was perfect for my use. Worked good the day we bicycled, too.
- 3.0 out of 5
I moved on from H1 to H5 in the hope that I am graduating to a much better camera. But I was dissapointed with the all-round package that the H5 offered me. It was brilliant in parts but overall its not what it seems from outside! The 3 inch LCD is simply great to view but the downside of it is it consumes battery heavily. And I was using Powerex 2500 mAh NIMH batteries and those used to exhaust in no time. So I always used to carry another set of fully charged batteries 'coz invariably the camera used to flash low battery after a couple of dozens of shots. The flash, though quite powerful, takes ages to recharge after a shot (around 12-15 secs.) and you end up waiting for it to be ready before you take the next shot. Finally I decided to "downgrade" (in terms of Megapixels - 6MP as compared to 7.2MP in H5)from Sony H5 to Canon S3IS and I have since not regretted my decision. Though the LCD is tiny - 2 inches as compared to 3 inches and the flash doesn't pop-up automatically as the H5 used to do - I am vey happy with the performance of the S3, which is basically the bottom-line of any good camera. So my advice is that first check out the camera before deciding in its favour - because the H5's features are great but using it at times proves to be a bit impractical.
- 3.0 out of 5
I have turned off the "super steady shot" and installed NIMH batteries but still get less than 50 pictures before the batteries die. This at 5M. What am I doing wrong? Any suggestions?
- 5.0 out of 5
Firstly, I want to get something off my chest. This camera has received a bit of a hammering for poor battery life, and sure, I've owned cameras which are much better in this respect but it's not the worst by far either and a few points to note. 1) This camera uses standard AA size batteries. They are cheap as chips even for good capacity ones and so even when your batteries eventually die, they are really cheap to replace unlike proprietary ones. 2) Because they are cheap and easy to get hold of, it's not a big inconvenience to carry a few spares around with you if you really are going to be keeping the cmera busy. Plus, it's not a pocket camera pretty any camera bag you buy for it will accomodate spares easily. 3) We have to remember that it only uses 2 of them. Other manufacturers can claim longer battery life but accomodating 4 batteries in the camera but at the expense of having a bigger body.
So, with that gripe off my chest, here's what i like about it.
Picture Quality is generally excellent. The camera keeps noise well under control except in the higest ISO mode and even at ISO 1000 it's not unbearable. At least ISO 1000 is present.
Purple fringing can be a problem, as it can on many cameras of this type. It will show up on high contrast edges but would probably not even be noticable unless you're printing out on large format paper or are really zoomed in. I would have liked to see less fringing though.
The lens seems very good quality. Distortion is very low and focus is maintained well in to the corners. The zoom is variable speed and very smooth.
The image stabilisation is a fantastic feature. Of course a relatively steady hand is still required, you cant take great pics jumping up and down on a trampoline but it really comes in to it's own at the telephoto end of the zoom where shake would be more noticable, and it also really helps with those spontaneou shots where youdont really have time to frame properly. As an example, whilst in holiday a hummingbird cought my eye and luckily I had the camera turned on. I swung the camera at the hummingbird and pressed the shutter with no time to make any preparations and the resulting picture is rock solid, capturing the detail of the feathers and even stopping the wings in motion with only the slightest motion blur on the edges. I could never have done this without Steady Shot.
Video is of a quality not unlike my Mini-DV camcorder and still looks perfectly acceptable displayed on a television. Shame you cant zoom during video capture though.
The LCD display is one of this cameras strongest features. It is huge and of a very high resolution. It is bright and clear in all but the brightest sunlight.
The handling is OK. The weight is good as is the grip bu I do have a tendancy to rest my left index finger on top of the pop-up flash, preventing it from popping up. Oh, and the flash is pretty strong too allowing for flash use further than just portraits.
Overall, i reslly like it and if you're after someting a bit better and more flexible that a pocket point and shoot then this may be the one for you. It takes great pics in fully auto mode and of course you can fiddle with the setting manually if you want to be more creating.
Best camera I've owned anyway. It has competion though so worth having a good shop around and see what suits you best.
- 5.0 out of 5
The H-5 is a great camera. I have a Canon 20D but its large and heavy. The H-5 is a great travel companion with great quality.
- 5.0 out of 5
Two days have just passed, so I am still exploring this great looking camera....however, so far, I have found this camera to meet my expectations and confirm what I have read about it in so many reviews. I yet have to explore further, but so far, I am very impressed! It is an intelligent camera and shows most especially when in the manual PASM mode....as you play around with the different parameters (f-stop, shutter speed, etc), what you see in the screen is that the image of what you are about to take adjusts accordingly to what you expect with the current parameter settings....this is not so with the Kodak Z710 which I had just purchased 3 months ago. So far, the photos I have taken are excellent! Also, this camera looks so pretty, stylish, and classy!!
- 5.0 out of 5
I am a 64 year old who takes pictures of the scenery and wildlife in Northern Ontario to share with friends and family. I need a camera that has a sizable view screen, can pull in stable telephoto images, and responds quickly. My initial experience is that the H5 meets my needs.
- 5.0 out of 5
I thought long about the Sony versus the Canon. I already owned the little Powershot A540 and it took excellent pictures, had many useful features, and was an overall, well thought out little camera. This caused me to lean toward the Canon S3 IS. I had no experience with the Sony cameras. Comparing the sample pictures from the two cameras, the Sony looked to have an edge in picture sharpness and detail. In going to a number of retailers to 'handle' the two cameras, I couldn't find ONE Canon which was functional. All the Sonys were operational. In two cameras so close in specifications, that was the straw which broke the camels back. Now the Sony doesn't have a couple of the features the Canon has, such as the programmable time exposure, and the excellent video capture modes. But it takes stunning pictures! The typical question from people who see the Sony's pictures is "My Word! What did you take this with?" I am completely happy with the camera, and I'm still learning to use it.
- 3.0 out of 5
having been a photographer most of my life (40yrs}
as I did not want a camera with allot of lens to take on trips, and my grand kids. I felt that H5 would fit the bill. Last summer we went to russia and most of my outdoor pictures came out good.However when I
took flash pictures in the bottom of the pictures I
found that lens shade produced a shadow? I sent the camera to sony,with pictures (twice) There reply was to take the lens shade off when using the flash? also when using a uv filter(sony filter) the lens cap doesn't fit.
- 4.0 out of 5
Great family and holiday photos but if you have stock photography ambitions get a Canon or Nikon D-SLR. Many good features but the processor or the lenses (or a combination of both) are producing artifacts and purple fringing of an unacceptable level when images are viewed at full size. Zoom is good but always use a tripod. Wide angle lens is a great addition. Macro not so great. I recommend using the manual setting whenever possible. Sony is doing a great job in audio and LCD TV technology but in digital photography they have a long way to go.
In conclusion I recommend the Sony CyberShot H5 for every day photography, but be aware of its limitations.
Cheers, Tibi
- 5.0 out of 5
Hi
My name is Avinash and I am from Bangalore- India. I just bought a Sony H5 after comparing and reading the reviews about Sony H5, Cannon S3 IS and Olympus Sp 510. I am very happy with the Amazing picture and the clarity on the LCD Screen.
I do agree that the battery indicator is just a fake alarm and scares me to shoot an further. And speaking about Indoor photography, I some how feel that it requires a lit bit of tweaking and after the click they are worth the time in tweaking and adjusting the options avilabel.
I am really thrilled about the 12 x Zoom the amazing ease of using it. I am an Novice and would like to explore more and learn how to use the manual mode in Sony H5, I would apprciate any any inputs for this.
I also would like to know how to Extend the Zoom to 57 or what ever the maximum is. I do understand that the clarity of the picture could detoriate B coz of this but I just would like to give a try ...
Any suggestions are welcome !!!!
Thankz in advance..
Avinash Prabhakar.
- 5.0 out of 5
I originally wanted a Nikon d50 or even the rebel xt dslr. However, money was an issue so i took a gander at the advanced-point-and-shoot cameras. Here's what I found out about my Sony H5:
GOOD:
1. optical zoom is amazing.
2. large 3" lcd screen provided clear live-shooting mode.
3. lighter than a dslr
4. provides manual settings just like a dslr!
5. comes with a lens adapter so you can add on filters, wide-angle lenses, and telephoto lenses
6. comes with (and runs on) 2 AA rechargable batteries. I suggest purchasing another set of batteries (one set to be in the camera and another set to be in the charger)
7. is equipped with a powerful flash (16m). great for those outdoor under-the-shadow shots.
8. Stabilizer really works!
BAD:
1. doesn't do well in low-light. Anything past 400 ISO is grainy. The slr cameras wouldn't have this problem.
2. Burst mode is weak. 1 frame/sec. The Canon S3 IS is faster and more suitable for those who want a faster camera.
3. Inability to manually adjust focus. This is really a nag because some surfaces (reflections, glare, etc.) throws off the auto-focus sensor and refuses to focus on the object that you want. This is BIG downside.
4. When handing it off to a stranger to take a picture of you and your family, their thumb accidently tends to hit the macro button which throws everything out of focus. So rule of thumb: find a stranger with small fingers to take pictures. That way they won't hit the macro button =).
5. Size. Granted, it's a bigger camera due to a bigger lens, but it wouldn't hurt to have a smaller camera handy (like for those times when you are hanging out with friends and you don't want to whip out a giant behemoth.)
6. USB cable is proprietary. Meaning: DON'T LOSE IT! A replacement won't be available at your local best buy or circuit city. Only sony carries it and you may have to dish out a pretty penny. If you do lose the usb cable, get a card reader...far less expensive and more worthwhile.
7. The flash is strong however when you have the lens adapter on, it tends to block the bottom portion of the flash. What you get is a nice well-lit picture with a dark semi-circle on the bottom of the picture. If only sony had a hotshoe for a speedlight, that would've been great.
Overall:
A great camera to own if a dslr is out of the price range. The only worry is night-time shots. It is very poor when shooting at above 400 ISO. So be prepared for that. To go around the graininess, adjust the exposure rate to be longer, however a tripod would be needed.
- 5.0 out of 5
This cameras has exceeded all of my expectations!! althou I haven't had it for that long the pictures I have taken so far have been amazingly clear. It is very easy to handle and not to complicated,for I am a idiot when it comes to digital cameras I have figured it out rather well!! I recommend the cybershot H5 to anyone looking for a quality and ,"idiot proof",digital cam.!!
- 4.0 out of 5
Well! i wouldn't wanna lie to ya'll..this camera is good..the most striking thing is it's 12x optical zoom..the picture review quality is worth mentioning and plus with a 3inch display..it's worth a peek..i believe this camera falls into the category for those photographers who don't wanna buy extra lenses though there is a option for attaching lense....of lately! i hear strange motor noise when i place my ear near to the microphone...now that's strange..else..it's a nice product.
- 4.0 out of 5
I had a Canon G3 for the last two years. Two months ago I bought a H5. So far I was satisfied with the product. The H5 flash is too powerful so I adjusted the flash level to -2.00 when shooting in a room. To preserve the battery life, I set the "redeyes feature" to OFF, and use the viewfinder instead of the LCD screen (The 3 " LCD screen uses a lot of battery juice). With this H5, I got much less "out of focus" pictures than my G3, especially when taking pictures in a low lighted setting. . May I ask the writer "P J D - 11/7/06" to kindly help me in setting up properly my H5 in order to get "true color" pictures. Thank you.
- 5.0 out of 5
what else can i say? It`s a Sony
- 4.0 out of 5
sony's h5 takes great pictures at lower iso(<400).at higher iso there is too much noise.
the camera has a long zoom which is most attractive.the IS isn't that good but works well.
in lon zoom arena the camera features everything and i think it wins in many fields compared to others
- 5.0 out of 5
I purchased this camera as soon as it came out. I had been waiting for it because it seemed to have all the features I wanted. I was using an Olympus 770, which I had been happy with, but it lacked some features, especially the image stabilizer. I always want cameras with long range zooms and this one works great. I am especially happy with the speed of the camera. I went to a Blue Angele's show on a cold and overcast day. I took a lot of pictures of planes and jets going by. Nearly all were crisp and centered, even those taken at max zoom. NOne of my other cameras would have enabled me to do that. Battery life has been no problem, especially coming from a camera that used it own special ones. AA's are great. I bought the Energizer pack at Sam's club that came with 8 rechargeable AA's and 4 AAA's, plus a very compact recharger that holds 4 at a time. It cost around $24. With this pack I have never had to worry about running out of charge. Often I only use one set during an entire day.
- 4.0 out of 5
After my nikon cookpix broke I decided it was time to get a camera that wouldn't take terrible shots in low light. I mostly use my camera indoors for pictures of my kids and images I take of items I am selling on eBay. I did not want to spend the money on an SLR, plus I really don't know the first thing about setting up shots with an SLR. I knew a large lense helped with low light shots so I purchased this one. When I first got it I was really confused on how to take a decent indoor picture. The manual made little sense to me because I have no experience with photography lingo. After playing with the camera for several hours I figured out how to work the thing and actually turned out some decent shots that my coolpix could have never achieved. This was hit or miss however. Even at the best settings I can not figure out how to make low light look good. I was hoping this would be a camera that I could just turn on and shoot indoors but I have found that to set up the perfect shot indoors I have to adjust several settings for each different lighting situation. I was hoping this camera would be more automatic. It isn't.
For ametures this camera will not be the best. I am not going to be returning the camera so I will be learning really quick how to work it. So far the camera has been pretty good at helping me, especially with the menus. Out of every 100 shots I turn out about 20 good ones so I am getting better. This is not a point and shoot, so if you want that buy a more automatic camera.
Outdoor shots are gorgeous when lots of sunlight is involved. The long distance landscape option is VERY cool too.
This thing uses AA batteries up quickly. The Sony batteries last 4x longer I have found and they are only 10 bucks each which is a good value in my opinion.
I know that when I figure out this camera a little better I will enjoy it more. Maybe enough to add an extra star.
- 3.0 out of 5
Has some great features, but then...pics somewhat fuzzy, colors not quite true, and if used in auto results are dreadful.
Sold mine at a loss and went with a cannon s2 is, less $$, better results. Stay away from Sony, doesnt quite cut it. Also equate into your purchase decission their APPALING customer service.
- 5.0 out of 5
i have previously owned a canon a75, fuji e550 and a canon a610...my 2 canons were great, the fuji was frustrating....i needed more zoom and was struggling between the H5 and the canon S3...well, the lcd on the H5 is what sold me, it is incredible...the pictures i have printed are awesome, the zoom is perfect, i love getting closer to the action(i take a lot of pics of my kids playing soccer)....my only issue with the camera is the flash recharge time, with my 620 i could click, click, click....this one takes time to recharge...maybe that is 2 batteries against 4....but the flash itself kicks butt on almost any other camera i have seen, it is very strong and really works...other than that, the H5 is the best...i am beyond happy with my purchase and fully recommend it to others
- 4.0 out of 5
Love my Sony H5. Wanted a nice travel camera for a two week trip to Europe - Provence and Ireland. This was my shift to digital and originally intended going to a dSLR. Glad I didn't. Ease of use meant I got results from the H5 that are as good or better than I would have gotten from a lower end dSLR. What really sold me was the huge 3" display. Really like the way the program dial comes up in the display with an explanation of the setting. This is a must for anybody who needs reading glasses. I wanted a camera with a 'viewfinder' with a diopter because most of the LCD screens I have used got washed out in daylight - not a problem with the H5 - now I rarely use the viewfinder.
The camera is very comfortable to hold. I use a wrist strap instead of a neck strap and stow it in a neat beltloop bag from Lowepro instead of the Sony bag.
Battery life is good for two AAs. I agree with previous writer that the battery meter is not very accurate. However, the rechargeable AA Cybershot batteries that come with it really do pack more punch than other brands and give more accurate meter readings. Worth getting Cybershots for your spares.
Picture quality is superb. Before the trip I tried it out on a family portrait shoot taken by an enthusiast relative. He used his new Sony Alpha and a Canon SLR while I set my H5 on a tripod with the timer. My shots came out the best. Most of photos in the south of France were taken in flat, late afternoon, overcast October lighting and all came out excellent. Got great oohs and wows for my slide show, although I have since tweaked them in Photoshop to punch them up a bit.
IS system works great. Got great handheld pictures of floodlit castles in Carrcassone.
My only grumbles are: no raw format, wish I could attach a filter directly to the lens body instead of the long barrel adapter, focus assist light is a bit intrusive (but very effective), no auto rotate, could do with more program modes especially a fill flash mode and a panorama assist.
- 5.0 out of 5
User friendly and high zoom camera. Feautue rich with full manual controls as required for amateur as well as professional photography. Camera fulfills what all the manufacturer claims. Tremendous clarity and reasonable level of depth too. Noise levels are low till ISO400 which is good for most amateur applications. Movie mode is extremely good - excellent movies. One can leave behind ones videocams. Excellent image stabalization. The supplied hood is an added advantage specially when photographing in the sun. Add a polarizing filter to get excellent results.
Sony has done excellent work by providing an extremely bright and large 3"LCD, which is really great for people like me (40+) for a clear view of the subject. Strongly recommended.
- 4.0 out of 5
I bought this camera because of the large screen. I need reading glasses, and with the small screen on my old Canon, I just couldn't focus unless I put on my reading glasses. With the large 3" screen, I can see what I'm shooting without glasses, and also check the shots afterwards. That's a major plus. I had been thinking about a Panasonic, but its 2.5" screen had half the pixels and when zooming, it made some parts of the screen blurry, making it impossible to focus correctly.
The reason I couldn't give this camera the highest 5 star rating is the time it takes for the camera to recharge when taking flash pictures. It takes a good five seconds and that's just too long. It's probably because the camera uses only 2 AA batteries. 4 would have eliminated the problem, I believe.
I spent two weeks in Europe with the camera and took great pictures. I bought a faster charger and more batteries so that I always had a spare. I would suggest that anyone buying a battery charger get one that discharges the battery first, because the batteries used by this camera take quite a few charges before they "learn" to hold a full charge, and the right charger can make this process a lot easier. I also have noticed that just because the camera tells you it has a low battery doesn't mean that it really does. That's another reason to have a charger that discharges the battery fully, or else you'd be recharging batteries that had a charge, and they'd "learn" not to fully charge.
I mostly shoot on automatic, but every once in a while I try the manual settings, and have gotten pictures that otherwise I would have missed, though I'm not an expert at it, yet.
I used the self-timer all over Europe to take pictures of myself and my wife, and got a lot of smiles from people watching me race around to get into the picture. But I also got a lot of pictures of the two of us that I wouldn't have gotten otherwise. My smaller Canon has the same feature but the larger body of the Sony seems to make it easier to set up steadily. Also the larger screen allows you to easily see what you are framing while you are placing the camera, sometimes a bit precariously.
The movie mode shoots fantastic videos. Watching them they look about as good as from a movie camera. I'm sure they're not, but to your average audience of family and friends, they're very impressive.
Deleting pictures is a two-step process that is a little too complicated, but then again, it does prevent accidental erasures.
All in all I love this camera, and would give it 4.5 stars if that were an option. And again, for anyone needing reading glasses, that big screen is a major plus.
- 5.0 out of 5
After reading a lot of reviews it came down to the Canon S3IS, Panasonic FZ7, Panasonic FZ50, and the Sony H5. I have come to the conclusion that all of them would make great cameras for most people most of the time. It seemed that I would ultimately be happy with the pictures from any of them so it really came down to handling, features, and how the menus functioned. I preferred the use of AA batteries so the Panasonics were out and although I preferred the in hand feel of the S3IS SLIGHTLY more than the H5 it was not enough to make up for the things I liked more on the H5. The 3" screen (although I feel Sony should used a 2.5" screen) and the layout of the different menus are what sold me on the H5. The 2" screen on the S3IS as well as Sony's own H2 just seems so small by todays standards. A 2.5" screen seems to be the best compromise between size and not taking up too much room. Sony really should have just updated last years H1 with its 2.5" screen and had one camera of this type in it's lineup and split the price difference between the H2 and H5...good marketing I guess. Anyway, I am very happy with the H5. Pictures so far have come out great and it is easy to use. I have not had any problems with hitting buttons by mistake as some other reviewers have stated, although I have relatively small hands. The lens hood worked great the other day when I was shooting in bright sunlight. I had taken some shots without the hood and some reflection on the lens was showing up in the pictures but with the hood it was totally eliminated. It is very nice that Sony includes this feature. The only negative so far is that the battery life indicator is EXTREMELY inaccurate. I was a litte worried and thought I would probably be returning the camera since after only about 30-35 shots the indicator was showing that I had used up half the capacity (I was using the supplied Sony batteries). There was no way I was going to keep the camera if I was only able to get 70-90 shots before a battery change was needed. I continued shooting up to about 150-160 shots when the indicator moved to the "battery low, recording/playback will stop soon" position. I left the batteries in which I'm glad I did since I was able to capture about 225 shots before the indicator moved to the "change batteries" postion. At this point I turned off the camera but didn't change the batteries. The next time I turned on the camera it was again showing the "battery low" postion and a was able to get another 40 shots before the "change batteries" showed up again. Many reviews comment on the poor battery life but hopefully this is not based on people changing the batteries when the indicator first says "battery low" since I was able to capture an addition 100 shots from the time this first showed up. Anyway, my battery concerns were unfounded but I may set the display so it doesn't show the battery life all the time since it can keep you on edge when for 100 shots you see that your batteries are supposedly low. The camera is a little bulky to carry around but once in hand it's worth it. It doesn't feel like a toy like so many small point & shoots do. The controls all work very smooth and the versatility of the extra zoom range without having to carry around a bunch of lenses it fantastic. All in all a very nice camera. Hope this helps.
- 5.0 out of 5
i had use cameras of nikon and canon and other but in this range and prise i just say it is excellent. i used to give my friends advise to buy it. i think the lance and shutter speed also other features make it rocking.tell me more abour DSC-R1 because i want to take it.
- 5.0 out of 5
This is simply a fantastic camera. super crisp pictures , point and shoot or "La carte " , Simply great !
it looks great, works great and is extremely simple to use despite its sophisticated and formidable looks.
- 5.0 out of 5
Researched buying a digital camera for 4 months before my trip to Hawaii and I almost went with the Panasonic TZ1 (which I thought was an excellent camera with 10x optical zoom. Then I was persuaded to look at the Canon SD630 which was another very nice camera with better Macro rendering than the Panasonic and other features that the Panasonic didn't offer (like color swapping)and a bit more compact. But then I got my hands on the H5 and that is all she wrote! I took comparative shots with all 3 cameras of the same object and while by themselves the pictures were good-looking, when you compared them to each other the H5 was just SO much better in every way (Pictures were printed on the same print paper from the same printer). Bright, crisp pictures, 12x optical zoom and a feel in your hands that makes you think you actually know what you're doing, did it for me.
I bought some extra batteries (Duracell 2600..very inexpensive) and battery life was no longer an issue.
- 4.0 out of 5
Have had it now for about three months. Like the grip, the LCD screen size and ease of operation. However, on a recent trip driving through Utah I shot off some spectacular shots of the scenery. When I tried to download the pictures, they weren't to be found! The next day it behaved itself. Anyone have a similar experience? Other than this glitch it's clearly a 5-star product.
- 4.0 out of 5
A $500 camera should be able to shoot RAW files; not this one. The batteries required 14 hours to charge before I stopped getting the message, "Turn camera off and on." Controls fairly user-friendly, shutter sound is nice, but could be louder. Image review/delete could be simpler. Lower than average shutter delay. Excellent auto settings and lighting exposures.
- 5.0 out of 5
it was great
- 5.0 out of 5
I read a ton of reviews about the Sony and the Canon S3. I did not know which way to go until I went to a local store and handled them both. I would suggest this if you are unsure. I really preferred the way the Sony handled and the large display so I purchased it. Very glad I did, this is a wonderful camera which takes very good pictures. My wife has an Epson Picturemate printer and together they do a wonderful job. More than I could have hoped for in this purchase. The only negative is the batteries that came with it, I bought Duracell 2650's and they are working great.
- 5.0 out of 5
Pro; The Sony H5 camera is for novice and those up to vacation and family outing warriors that produce outstanding photos that are as good as the photos seen in trade magazines (like National Geographic) . Eat your heart out Panasonic fz7, Canon S3IS owners; sorry the Sony H5 is the best. Best Pictures (that������s what its all about), best movies, best looking, best operation, best LCD screen, all that which makes it best around zoom camera. If you������re going out to get perfect photos,
Look no further. If you������re a professional, pay the big bucks (Thousands of dollars) and get a cameras that dose������s all those adjustment and functions. For me being a camera nut it������s one of the best purchases I ever made. I love taking pictures and producing slides and DVD movies for my family and friends, and you know what, they cannot wait to get them.
Con; You can find problem with anything if you try hard enough, but I������m too busy taking great pictures!
- 5.0 out of 5
The camera's awesome 3-inch LCD screen was one of my top requirements when doing the research for a new camera, which means I narrowed down to just a few models as many other cameras have smaller LCD screens. I couldn't stress enough the importance of having a decent and LCD screen to instantly view your results and see if you may want to make some adjustments. The LCD screen is large, and it seems that what you see on it is actually what you get. So I don't even use the regular, tiny viewfinder, I only use the LCD screen. The LCD screen uses a lot of power, but that's not a problem because those AA batteries are cheap. I take several charged sets with me wherever I go with my camera these days. I have been able to take some stunning photos with this camera, including some very beautiful portrates. You can use the Auto mode and take great pictures, but I usually switch to manual and create my own exposure. The priority modes are very easy to use and do a great job, with the exception of the High Sensitivity mode because it tends to use very high ISO, and the images tend to get noisy as you go above ISO 400 with this camera. But I've taken fantastic photos using ISO 400 with this camera. The photos are bright, clear and crisply perfect. In my quest to pushing this camera's limit, I took a stunning photo of the moon at 1:30 am last night. I zoomed in at 57x (I love the Smart Digital Zoom) on a tripod and set my own exposure on manual mode. Then I took the photo using its two-second delay timer (10 secs is the default). Email me at cmerighe@natr.com and I will send you the photo for you to have an idea of how great this camera is.
Overall, I am very pleased with this camera, and I recommend it to anybody.
- 4.0 out of 5
So Easy to capture even in law light..if hotshoe
is there it will be useful for professional use.
- 5.0 out of 5
Updating from A Fugi 5100 which lag time was slow
The Sony H5 with its big screen — great I have been trying the movie mode so far excellent pictures are remarkable I hope to get many yrs out of this camera I highly reccomend it
- 5.0 out of 5
I was upgrading from a Fuji S602 which I had almost three years. I wanted a 12 x optical and I was looking at the Panasonicfz7 and also the kodak z612. this was by far the best of those. The noise level is lower and it performs better in low light. the pictures are great. Have not yet tried all features, but was taking pictures of my Grandchildren at a party last weekend and especially liked the burst mode. Taking a lot of pix of the kids in action gets some great shots. color are great. I prefer the vivid setting for scenery and normal for people. So far am glad I purchased this one.
- 5.0 out of 5
Just purchased it. Have not had time to use all features which are a lot. But have been playing with it and the pictures are great. Battery life not too great. Having trouble accidentally hitting the zoom I have to learn to keep my finger on the grip below the wide angle and zoom.I have a Sony dsc 30 which I still use. It is a great camera I just wanted to upgrade.. I like the protected lcd screen and the battery on it.
- 5.0 out of 5
I recently moved from a Pentax Optio S4 - about as compact as you can get - to the Sony H5, and whilst it's no longer a case of reaching into my pocket for my camera, the results I'm getting have made the change more than worth while. The 12x zoom lets me take fantastic shots of my two little boys, without them even knowing, so far less of those ridiculous faces children pull as soon as you point a camera at them. The colours are great, and the 7 megapixels give the pictures great clarity. I'm an enthusiast rather than an expert, so I'm still learning, but it really isn't hard to get terrific results from this camera right from the get go. I'd recommend it to anyone who has reached that stage where they want to do more than simply point & shoot.
- 5.0 out of 5
Great picture quality. 3" LCD screen allows excellent view. On screen descriptions of settings are great. Video quality is excellent. Over all great buy.
- 5.0 out of 5
Tremendous. I took a picture of a bank parking lot. Then zoomed in on an 18" sign 50 feet away. Then loaded to my laptop, further zoomed and read the grade markings on one of the mounting bolts!! Truely amazing quality. Lots of features, some I haven't used yet. I photographed a deer in my yard, through window glass and can see the velvet on its antlers! 3" LCD is great. Fully auto or fully manual.
Only negative is the documentation. The users manual keeps refering to the "Read first folder" Why didn't they put everything in one booklet?
- 5.0 out of 5
it is a great camera so you guys just gotta get it...
- 5.0 out of 5
Few days ago I purchased this camera. Results are excellent. Nice handy camera. Just one step below to any SLR camera. Sony's ever best point and shoot camera. Picture quality is also excellent. Grip is very good. 2AA battery is plus point. Minimum 512MB card is required. ISO up to 1000 and 3.0 inch LCD screen provides good professional look. Overall a excellent camera.
