Sony Cybershot H7
Sony Cybershot H7
1
Hey! You should know that Sony has released a newer version of this product: the Sony Cybershot H20.
Sony Cybershot H7
Editor's Review
The H7 is quite old by digital camera standards. If you're looking to purchase a Sony point-and-shoot with a hefty zoom, take a look at the recent H20. Here's what we had to say about the H7 when it was released in February 2007:
The Sony Cybershot H7 is a marvelous update on one of the most popular extended zoom cameras ever, the Sony H2. This model features a capable 8.1 megapixel sensor and outrageously long 15x zoom, second only to the 18x Olympus SP-550UZ in zooming potential. The H7 is a slightly cheaper version of the Sony H9, but the only major difference is that the H7 has a 2.5-inch LCD as opposed to the H9's 3.0-inch display.
Editor's Review
The H7 is quite old by digital camera standards. If you're looking to purchase a Sony point-and-shoot with a hefty zoom, take a look at the recent H20. Here's what we had to say about the H7 when it was released in February 2007:
The Sony Cybershot H7 is a marvelous update on one of the most popular extended zoom cameras ever, the Sony H2. This model features a capable 8.1 megapixel sensor and outrageously long 15x zoom, second only to the 18x Olympus SP-550UZ in zooming potential. The H7 is a slightly cheaper version of the Sony H9, but the only major difference is that the H7 has a 2.5-inch LCD as opposed to the H9's 3.0-inch display.
Specifications
- 8.1 megapixels
- 15x optical zoom / 30x digital zoom
- Auto focus
- Auto and manual exposure
- ISO 80-3200
- Movie mode with sound
- Super Steady Shot Image Stabilization
- HDTV output
- 2.5-inch LCD
- Memory Stick storage (31MB internal)
- Lithium-ion battery
- Part Number: DSCH7B.CEH
- UPC: 027242712935
- Release Date: Feb 28, 2007
Shop for H7 Accessories
Sony Cybershot H7 Comments & Questions (write your own!)
black display (Reggie17 — 06/25/2009)
My DSC-H1's display is black with white lettering that says 'turn camera on and off'. When I turn it on and off, i get the same black display with the same message. Help! I love my camera and can not use it. Does this need repaired??
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (06/26/2009)
Have you tried reinitializing the camera? Also, downloading and installing any available firmware updates. But if it persists, then it may be that it needs a repair.
reply to this comment
How come the Sony H7 image resolution and size are so small? (Tommyboy — 06/09/2009)
I've gone through the menus and can't seem to find the option to increase the resolution and image size quality. Every picture I take is well under a meg in size at 96x96 dots per inch.
I suspect I'm message up a setting. Is there a way to set back to factory default? But it would be nice to know where I go to set the image resolution and quality.
reply to this comment
I suspect I'm message up a setting. Is there a way to set back to factory default? But it would be nice to know where I go to set the image resolution and quality.
by James DeRuvo (06/09/2009)
Sony has a tutorial here ( kb.sony.com/selfservice/mic... ) which walks you through it.
But basically, you turn off the camera, remove the battery, press down the power switch again and then replace the battery.
reply to this comment
But basically, you turn off the camera, remove the battery, press down the power switch again and then replace the battery.
Insides of my H7 shaking! (redhdgirl417 — 05/27/2009)
I recently purchased a slightly used H7 to use for my niece's graduation ceremony (knew I would be sitting up in the stands of the football field and wanted the 15x zoom plus for my son's sports). As I was taking pictures at the grad ceremony, the lens suddenly starting "jumping" around, felt like the insides of the camera were shaking! And I would have to turn the camera off or switch to a different shooting mode (IE from ISO to auto) to get it to stop. Took crap shots because it couldn't focus in when it was doing this. Any ideas of what might be possessing my H7?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (05/28/2009)
It may have an active focusing setting. This is where the lens will constantly focus like a camcorder. Look in your menu settings or simply reinitialize the camera.
reply to this comment
redhdgirl417 (05/29/2009)
James, thank you for replying. I think my "shake" issue is more than the camera auto focusing because it doesn't do this all the time. Seems when the battery gets past 1/2 used and the camera is being used for an extended period of time. The image on the LCD screen literally shakes and the camera can't truly focus on what I'm trying to shoot. I've turned off the image stabilation so that it only comes on when the shutter has been pressed 1/2 way down instead of on continuously but that didn't eliminate it. And the lens motor almost sounds like it is grinding when it starts doing this. Any other suggestions?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (05/29/2009)
Well a grinding noise tells me it's in need of repair, Steph. Was it dropped by chance?
reply to this comment
redhdgirl417 (05/29/2009)
Not dropped by me...have only had a little over a month. It is a refurb, though...was working just fine until I was shooting pics of my niece's HS graduation ceremony last weekend and started the funky blur/shake thing. Almost looks like a movie special effect on the LCD screen and you can feel the insides, which I'm assuming is the lens motor, moving around. I just fully charged up the battery tonight and still doing it with a full charge and the camera set back to it's factory settings. I've searched the web but nothing found for this issue. I did buy a 1 year warranty thru EBay for it, so I guess it will be that route. Thanks so much for trying to help...points awarded! :)
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (05/30/2009)
Well, if it's refurb'd it should have the same warranty as a new camera. Talk to SONY and get your camera to them asap.As for your eBay warranty, read the fine print. eBay is dumping ground for "gray market" cameras. This means they may not come with a warranty that is recognized in the US. So make sure that yours isn't one of them.
reply to this comment
redhdgirl417 (05/31/2009)
I bought the SquareTrade warranty for $20 for a year...they will give me what I paid for the item back if not able to fix it. Had a great customer rating; only reason I bought it. I mispoke...not refurb but slightly used from LSIDistributors...they sell seconds where 1 piece might be missing and the box is open/item returned. Stupid me but saved me almost $200 from buying NIB. Thanks for your help, James...I've sent an email to LSI regarding the issue but will most likely be sending it in to SquareTrade for fixing (certain it is a lens motor issue now).
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (06/02/2009)
That's not bad. Although I'm not really in favor of buying third party warranties, $20 is a pretty good deal, especially for a "used" camera.
reply to this comment
CAMERA SAY'S TURN OFF AN ON AGAIN (trucken — 05/01/2009)
THAT'S ALL IT SAY'S IS TURN OFF AN ON AGAIN / IV'E CHANGED BATTERIES / IT SAY'S ACESS THEN BEEPS A COUPLE OF TIMES THEN SAY'S TURN OFF AN ON / THE CAMERA WASS GIVEN TO ME FOR THIS REASON / WHAT CAN I TRY ???????
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (05/02/2009)
Well, you can try resetting/reinitializing it, update the firmware, and try more powerful batteries (they may be using underpowered cells - you need batteries with an mAh of at least 2500). But it may just need to be repaired. And frankly, at the age of the camera, it may cost more to repair than it's worth.
reply to this comment
WHAT IS WHOLESALE PRICE SONY H7 (GEM09 — 03/16/2009)
WHAT IS WHOLESALE PRICE FOR SONY H7
reply to this comment
Aditya D (03/28/2009)
The wholesale of the H7 is approximately $50 under the MSRP, it changes depending on market value.
reply to this comment
do the Sony H7 have GPS so it take the location of the Pic's? (richar2 — 02/18/2009)
Need GPS enable camera to properly use Iphoto '09
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (02/20/2009)
No. GPS wasn't all the rage in 07. It was just coming out though. My recommendation is to check out the Gisteq Photo Trackr. With it, any camera can have GPS capability. It's a very cool accessory from GiSTEQ which not only logs the date/time but also GPS coordinates. And the best part is it fits in your pocket. Using GPS, you can log every shot you take with it and then incorporate the information to not only know when you took it, but you can map where you took those pictures using Google Maps and Flickr. Very cool. I'd double check with the Gisteq website about iPhoto 09 however, since it's so new.
reply to this comment
Aditya D (02/22/2009)
Actually the H7 does have a GPS attachment that you can get with it. It was heavily marketed by Sony, but as it wasn't that popular, its not that well marketed anymore, but is carried in almost any Sony Style store, as well as some other big box retailers. It's essentially the same thing as the Gisteq Photo tracker, but the Sony version is proprietary, meaning there's a chance it will be more compatible, but the deeper meaning is that it will probably cost significantly more.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (02/23/2009)
It may interest you to know that Sony released the first GPS photo logger a few years back. It wasn't cheap then and it's not cheap now.
reply to this comment
How can I get true sunset colors, clouds etc.? (azgypsey — 02/08/2009)
When taking pix of sunsets, I've noticed that the pink or reddish tint of clouds is noticeably different than the actual scene. The film cameras that I have been using is a Minolta SRT101 and an older Argus. When taking shots that compare super close to the color intensity of the film prints, the deep red and pink tints of clouds or sky is just not there. I've tried varied settings, aperture and speed, hoping that exposure would somewhat correct the situation. I've not noticed much difference from shot to shot. I have various lenses from the Minolta than I had intended to use on a future purchase of a Sony DSLR with an adapter. That's another question down the road, right now the color is my main concern. Thanks much for your time. Azgypsey.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (02/11/2009)
That's because your computer monitor isn't calibrated for proper color and shade and neither is your printer. There are several affordable calibrators out there, but I doubt if you'll be able to completely match film quality without seriously processing the image with something like Adobe Lightroom and then printing it professionally.
reply to this comment
Larry (03/24/2009)
Yes, adjustment of computer monitor color is critical for such precise color matching. Plus, if memory serves correct, Minolta uses a slightly different color setup from the rest of the world and that can be cause for difficulties also. Since Minolta no longer manufactures cameras, perhaps it won't be an issue for you, but do avoid any used Minolta digital cameras if you are going to shoot for color calibrations on your monitor.
You might think to just use post processing in your computer and get the images to be the way you want them without calibrating the monitor which is OK until you want to share the images on someone elses computer. Opps!
reply to this comment
You might think to just use post processing in your computer and get the images to be the way you want them without calibrating the monitor which is OK until you want to share the images on someone elses computer. Opps!
How can I improve the picture quality of the Sony H7/H9 (joe doe — 05/15/2008)
I have had my Sony H7 for a few weeks now and I can say that I am utterly devastated. I bought the camera due to recommendations from people who claim Sony makes excellent cameras with excellent photos but my results have been dissapointing. Even this site has reviews that say "ubeatable" and "excellent camera" so please will one of these people help me.
The problem that I have is that the camera is VERY aggressive in its noise reduction. When I zoom in on pictures on my computer, the faces look like they are from a painting. The details in the pictures are not sharp at all and are frankly very low quality.
I have a 4 megapixel HP that (when zoomed) shows a lot more noise but has much cleaner and finer details.
An example of this is see on indoor photos of people with long hair. The older HP lets me zoom in and I can see individual strands of hair (though a lot more noise) On the Sony all I see when I zoom in is a jarbled sea of black.... no evidence at all that individual hairs exist in the photo!
I have tried keeping the ISO levels below 100, I have tried portrait mode, I have even tried the higher ISO levels but nothing seems to help.
Can anyone tell me if they are able to get better results? Is it something that I am doing wrong or is their some hidden setting that I am not aware of??
I would appreciate any and all advice... especially from the Sony H7 users who claim that this is a great camera. Please help me to undertand how to take great pictures with this greatly overpriced beast!!
reply to this comment
The problem that I have is that the camera is VERY aggressive in its noise reduction. When I zoom in on pictures on my computer, the faces look like they are from a painting. The details in the pictures are not sharp at all and are frankly very low quality.
I have a 4 megapixel HP that (when zoomed) shows a lot more noise but has much cleaner and finer details.
An example of this is see on indoor photos of people with long hair. The older HP lets me zoom in and I can see individual strands of hair (though a lot more noise) On the Sony all I see when I zoom in is a jarbled sea of black.... no evidence at all that individual hairs exist in the photo!
I have tried keeping the ISO levels below 100, I have tried portrait mode, I have even tried the higher ISO levels but nothing seems to help.
Can anyone tell me if they are able to get better results? Is it something that I am doing wrong or is their some hidden setting that I am not aware of??
I would appreciate any and all advice... especially from the Sony H7 users who claim that this is a great camera. Please help me to undertand how to take great pictures with this greatly overpriced beast!!
by James DeRuvo (05/16/2008)
Well, increased ISO won't help you. That just adds more noise. Staying at the lower ISO levels is your best bet and you may also want to go into aperture priority mode and open it up wider. Or, use the presets of portrait mode more. Auto is a jack of all trades setting which essentially compromises aperture, shutter speed and ISO to get the shot. Often, it's not the best.
There are numerous other menus you can tweak including a "sharpness" menu. You could try there. But first, I would reset the camera. This is a fairly easy procedure which involves either going into your setup menu and choosing "reset" (or intialize), holding down the menu key for 5 seconds, or, removing the batteries for a few minutes. It may be that the firmware loading got corrupted and the camera just needs to be "rebooted," which is something that turning it on/off won't accomplish. But after which, you should have the camera reset to factory default settings. Another tip is to go to SONY's website and look for firmware updates. Download and install them.
But in the end, it may just be how you shoot your pictures. You may also want to try shooting with a flash, even in daylight. It will make the subject "pop" in the photo quite nicely.
reply to this comment
There are numerous other menus you can tweak including a "sharpness" menu. You could try there. But first, I would reset the camera. This is a fairly easy procedure which involves either going into your setup menu and choosing "reset" (or intialize), holding down the menu key for 5 seconds, or, removing the batteries for a few minutes. It may be that the firmware loading got corrupted and the camera just needs to be "rebooted," which is something that turning it on/off won't accomplish. But after which, you should have the camera reset to factory default settings. Another tip is to go to SONY's website and look for firmware updates. Download and install them.
But in the end, it may just be how you shoot your pictures. You may also want to try shooting with a flash, even in daylight. It will make the subject "pop" in the photo quite nicely.
joe doe (05/16/2008)
Hello James,
I have tried a combination of every possible setting... decreased ISO, increased aperature, even increased sharpness from the menu. The portrait mode only serves to blur the background so that doesn't help either. The shots I have taken have been a mix of flash as well as non flash.... daytime as well as nighttime. Generally I notice that as the ISO increases, the "painted" effect increases so this leads me to believe it is the noise reduction scheme of the camera.
I have checked for firmware upgrades and there are none available as of yet though I have read quite a few owners of this camera clammering for Sony to include an update that allows for manual control of noise reduction.
From what I have gathered from searching the net, the bionz processor in this camera (the same as what Sony puts in the DSLR cameras) is over agressive in its approach to any perceived noise... To the point that it will apply heavy noise reduction which obscures details and thus gives the painted effect.
This painted effect is so dramatic that when I do a 100% zoom of a face in the photo it looks as if it is mottled and done in a watercolor effect. At first I thought my camera was defective because even my old HP does not produce such a bad effect. After reading many reviews on the internet I have concluded this is inherent in the Sony H7/H9.
A lot of people have praised this camera and given it excellent reviews so I was wondering if anyone had found any way to bypass this or adjust the settings to minimize this effect.
reply to this comment
I have tried a combination of every possible setting... decreased ISO, increased aperature, even increased sharpness from the menu. The portrait mode only serves to blur the background so that doesn't help either. The shots I have taken have been a mix of flash as well as non flash.... daytime as well as nighttime. Generally I notice that as the ISO increases, the "painted" effect increases so this leads me to believe it is the noise reduction scheme of the camera.
I have checked for firmware upgrades and there are none available as of yet though I have read quite a few owners of this camera clammering for Sony to include an update that allows for manual control of noise reduction.
From what I have gathered from searching the net, the bionz processor in this camera (the same as what Sony puts in the DSLR cameras) is over agressive in its approach to any perceived noise... To the point that it will apply heavy noise reduction which obscures details and thus gives the painted effect.
This painted effect is so dramatic that when I do a 100% zoom of a face in the photo it looks as if it is mottled and done in a watercolor effect. At first I thought my camera was defective because even my old HP does not produce such a bad effect. After reading many reviews on the internet I have concluded this is inherent in the Sony H7/H9.
A lot of people have praised this camera and given it excellent reviews so I was wondering if anyone had found any way to bypass this or adjust the settings to minimize this effect.
raaj (01/06/2009)
Hey..i own the H9 for a year now and frankly speaking i really dont see any problems... could u attach some of your photographs for us to see..
reply to this comment
Sony H7 vs Kodak Z812is (joe doe — 05/10/2008)
Hi everyone,
I currently own a Sony H7 but in the back of my mind I find myself longing for a Kodak z812is. The kodak does not have the zoom range, or the iso range... heck it does not even come with a lithium battery but it shoots video in High def (with sterero), it has a better viewfinder, is easier to access menus and functions. I was wondering if anyone has any opinions regarding the kodak vs the sony.
reply to this comment
I currently own a Sony H7 but in the back of my mind I find myself longing for a Kodak z812is. The kodak does not have the zoom range, or the iso range... heck it does not even come with a lithium battery but it shoots video in High def (with sterero), it has a better viewfinder, is easier to access menus and functions. I was wondering if anyone has any opinions regarding the kodak vs the sony.
by James DeRuvo (05/12/2008)
Well having a greater ISO range isn't all that, Joe. In fact, one of the Achilles heals of point and shoot cameras at this megapixel range is that the higher the MP, the greater noise asserts itself at higher ISOs. ( 6mpixel.org/en/? )
On the other hand, lithium batteries lose their capacity as they get older. So I find there's little advantage there. Why not pick up the camera for a weekend and see how you like it? If you do, the H7 can always become a backup camera or find it's way onto ebay, or you can return the Kodak if you find that wanting is a much greater thing than actually having.
reply to this comment
On the other hand, lithium batteries lose their capacity as they get older. So I find there's little advantage there. Why not pick up the camera for a weekend and see how you like it? If you do, the H7 can always become a backup camera or find it's way onto ebay, or you can return the Kodak if you find that wanting is a much greater thing than actually having.
joe doe (05/12/2008)
Thanks for the response James,
I am working on obtaining z812 to try myself but I thought I would get other user's opinions before making the investment in time and money.
I agree that ISO can actually be more of a hinderance in digital cameras but the Sony has a more usuable iso range than the Kodak. The problem is that the sony has a heavy noise reduction scheme that gives the pictures a cartoonish look when enlarged. It really bothers me that such an expensive and highly rated camera has such a huge flaw. I was wondering if the Kodak pictures are more "razor sharp" than the sony and if anyone knows of any picture quality flaws in the Kodak.
reply to this comment
I am working on obtaining z812 to try myself but I thought I would get other user's opinions before making the investment in time and money.
I agree that ISO can actually be more of a hinderance in digital cameras but the Sony has a more usuable iso range than the Kodak. The problem is that the sony has a heavy noise reduction scheme that gives the pictures a cartoonish look when enlarged. It really bothers me that such an expensive and highly rated camera has such a huge flaw. I was wondering if the Kodak pictures are more "razor sharp" than the sony and if anyone knows of any picture quality flaws in the Kodak.
joe doe (05/17/2008)
I just compared photos from the Kodak z712 and z812 and they appear far better than the Sony H8/H9. The Kodak photos also display noise reduction but at far less levels than the Sony. The main difference can be seen when looking at trees or grass. On the Sony the leaves of the trees are blurred wheras on the Kodak they appear far more clear and crisp.
On a 4x6 print this is not that noticeable but when you enlarge to 8x10 or even just zoom at 100% on your monitor the difference is like night and day.
The only advantage I see in the Sony is that it has a nice slideshow mode with audio and it comes with a lithium battery and remote control (I don't use the remote control anyway!) and a lens hood for daytime shooting. The lens hood is a monster so it is not really convenient to leave it on.
The most important thing on a camera is how it takes pictures and so far the Kodak seems to be ahead. Anyone have experience with either of these that could shed some more light??
reply to this comment
On a 4x6 print this is not that noticeable but when you enlarge to 8x10 or even just zoom at 100% on your monitor the difference is like night and day.
The only advantage I see in the Sony is that it has a nice slideshow mode with audio and it comes with a lithium battery and remote control (I don't use the remote control anyway!) and a lens hood for daytime shooting. The lens hood is a monster so it is not really convenient to leave it on.
The most important thing on a camera is how it takes pictures and so far the Kodak seems to be ahead. Anyone have experience with either of these that could shed some more light??
by James DeRuvo (05/20/2008)
Very good analyssis, Joe. I agree with it, too. Kodak is actually using a different approach to signal processing these days which essentially focuses on what's not there. It's kinda weird, but you can read about it here ( wired.com/gadgets/digitalca... ). the results are much sharper photos, particularly in low light.
reply to this comment
joe doe (05/20/2008)
Hi James,
Thanks for the link to the article. It really is enlightening and I think I may actually end up waiting until Kodak introduces the chip using the new processing. It seems like it may be ready toward the end of this year.
It is amazing that so many people write off Kodak as an off brand. They don't realize that a lot of the technology associated with digital cameras (from compression to sensor algorythms) is actually licensed from Kodak! Now if Kodak will just start using their own technology and make more competition killing products like the z712/z812 then we will have an American camera manufacturer we can actually be proud of!
reply to this comment
Thanks for the link to the article. It really is enlightening and I think I may actually end up waiting until Kodak introduces the chip using the new processing. It seems like it may be ready toward the end of this year.
It is amazing that so many people write off Kodak as an off brand. They don't realize that a lot of the technology associated with digital cameras (from compression to sensor algorythms) is actually licensed from Kodak! Now if Kodak will just start using their own technology and make more competition killing products like the z712/z812 then we will have an American camera manufacturer we can actually be proud of!
by James DeRuvo (05/22/2008)
Well they're getting serious again. I tested the Z1085 IS and it was a fantastic camera. 10MP was surprisingly sharp, even in low light, and hey, it shoots HD video!
reply to this comment
joe doe (05/23/2008)
Did the Z1085 have any degradation of picture quality because of the higher megapix on the small sensor? Do you think it had any gains in purple fringing compared to the Z812?
I am really curious about the new addition to the Kodak lineup. My paradigm may shift from Z812 lust to Z1085 lust!!!
reply to this comment
I am really curious about the new addition to the Kodak lineup. My paradigm may shift from Z812 lust to Z1085 lust!!!
by James DeRuvo (05/24/2008)
Well, you can read my review here ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). Hope it helps.
Overall, I was quite pleased with the quality.
reply to this comment
Overall, I was quite pleased with the quality.
I have recently purchased SONY DSC H3. How do I use zoom during the movie shooting?? (shirish — 04/28/2008)
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (04/29/2008)
You can't in most point and shoot cameras. There are a few exceptions, but I don't believe the H3 is one of them. I think the H9 has the capability along with the Kodak 1085IS (which also shoots in HD).
reply to this comment
shirish (04/30/2008)
Dear James,
Thank you for your reply.
But I still surprised to see zoom during movie recording in some kodak digicam with 5mpx & 3x optical zoom.
I think Sony DSC H3 is much superior than that of Kodak digicam, then why such discrepancy?
Bye
Best regards.
Gajendra G Kelkar
reply to this comment
Thank you for your reply.
But I still surprised to see zoom during movie recording in some kodak digicam with 5mpx & 3x optical zoom.
I think Sony DSC H3 is much superior than that of Kodak digicam, then why such discrepancy?
Bye
Best regards.
Gajendra G Kelkar
by James DeRuvo (05/01/2008)
I think it has to largely due to the size of chip being used by the camera. Though don't quote me on that. Processing video and audio is processor intensive. It may be that until recent developments in larger point and shoot chips that the addition of zoom couldn't be accommodated. Though some that had zoom previously usually didn't allow for audio.
I admit I could be wrong about it, but it seems to me that it was either zoom or audio and most preferred to have the audio. until now.
reply to this comment
I admit I could be wrong about it, but it seems to me that it was either zoom or audio and most preferred to have the audio. until now.
DPI Settings (bor4e4 — 04/23/2008)
I cannot find a way to change the settings of the camera so that it makes pictures with different that the original 72 dpi. I saw a review for bad print outs. Usually for print outs the dpi should be at least 100-150. 300 dpi would be best of course. So is there a way these settings to be changed and if yes - how?
reply to this comment
Andrew Skinner (04/24/2008)
You should be able to change the resolution settings to fine or high. I attempted to look up the manual for this camera ( esupport.sony.com/US/perl/m... ), but the Sony site is not cooperating this morning.
If you go through your camera's set-up, there should be an option for resolution settings. The higher your resolution on the pictures you take, the larger your DPI will be. Please note, that if you use your digital zoom, this will degrade the resolution of the images you take. Good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
reply to this comment
If you go through your camera's set-up, there should be an option for resolution settings. The higher your resolution on the pictures you take, the larger your DPI will be. Please note, that if you use your digital zoom, this will degrade the resolution of the images you take. Good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
bor4e4 (04/24/2008)
Well you can change the MP of your pictures. You have an option to make them 8MP, 5MP, 3MP... whichever you choose the dpi remain 72. Well I was explained that the MP is the digital resolution, while the dpi is the print resolution of an image. Which doesn't help much about print outs since whatever I put as MP, the 72dpi are kept. Please advise!? Anyone!?
reply to this comment
Andrew Skinner (04/25/2008)
This sounds more like a problem with your computer, printer, or specific photo editing program. What program are you using to print your pictures? Are you going through an online retailer, or printing them on your home printer?
reply to this comment
bor4e4 (05/01/2008)
Well I can always switch the dpi with my photoshop. The problem here is of course that if you have a 72-dpi graphic and you change it to a higher resolution, you will not increase the quality of the graphic. The information was originally stored at 72 dpi, and the computer cannot “make up” more information to improve the graphic quality. On the other hand decreasing the graphic by decreasing the quality from 300 dpi to 72 dpi is the standard procedure for "downgrading" a picture in order to make it "web friendly" sizewise... Here comes my question again - is this camera able to make pictures for print or only for web?
reply to this comment
Andrew Skinner (05/10/2008)
I'm not fully sure I understand what you're asking for. I know how changing the DPI of an image on the computer works, but you should have no issues printing an 8MP image from your camera at sizes up to 11x17". As for taking the photos, the only control over quality and size you have on your camera is to set it at 8M, 3:2, 5M, 3M, VGA or 16:9.
reply to this comment
joe doe (05/15/2008)
I too have the H7 and have noticed the unusually low DPI selection. I will check on an older camera and see what the DPI is from that one. It could be a different way of measuring or presenting DPI than we are used to (at least in terms of printers using 300 dpi and greater).
I will check a few cameras and post what I find.
reply to this comment
I will check a few cameras and post what I find.
joe doe (05/15/2008)
I just compared a few photos from different cameras:
Sony H7 - 8 megapix shot at 72x72 dpi
I compared that with a Sony T1(5mp), as well as cameras from HP (4mp), Kodak (2mp), and a generic camera (texkon k3 5mp with 12 mp interpolated).
All had 72x72 dpi. The generic camera was the only one that produced photos at a higher setting of 96x96 dpi. This camera was the only one that produced photos that were subpar so I have a feeling that this dpi measure is not the same as what we think of when using our printers.
reply to this comment
Sony H7 - 8 megapix shot at 72x72 dpi
I compared that with a Sony T1(5mp), as well as cameras from HP (4mp), Kodak (2mp), and a generic camera (texkon k3 5mp with 12 mp interpolated).
All had 72x72 dpi. The generic camera was the only one that produced photos at a higher setting of 96x96 dpi. This camera was the only one that produced photos that were subpar so I have a feeling that this dpi measure is not the same as what we think of when using our printers.
bor4e4 (05/20/2008)
Hey everyone! I appreciate your time looking into these settings. Let me update the information here. I just bought a Kodak camera as a present to a friend of mine. It was 129.99 - probably one of the cheapest you can find on the market. Well I made the setting to a maximum quality picture and guess what... The picture was 460 dpi. I wish that sony were a little bit more cooperative here, but unfortunately could not get any decent explanation. I will keep on digging in!
reply to this comment
susaan (06/27/2008)
Read all the above,still do not know if my camera,a Sony Dsc H-9 is capable of shooting at the 300 DPI needed for a new job.
We have tried all settings,looked online and in the manual....no luck.
reply to this comment
We have tried all settings,looked online and in the manual....no luck.
lnthoma (11/10/2009)
Most of these answers are not true - most are confusing DPI and PIXELS. If you look at the atributes of a picture on your computer it will state the actual "DPI" - at least in ACD or Paint or Hp photo it does. I have not seen any of the digital Cameras that state anything in DPI - only in pixels. I have not found any way to change the DPI of a picture once it has been taken. I have not found any way to cause the pictures to be recorded in different DPI's based on some setting of the camera. So does anyone out there have a complete answer to this?
reply to this comment
How do you change the ISO manually? (spridmore64 — 04/09/2008)
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (04/10/2008)
Page 20 manual: Using the wheel dial.
Turn the wheel dial to select the item you want to set. Move the yellow indication (V) to select the item. Press the (O) on the control wheel. The value turns yellow. When the values are displayed in yellow, the values can be selected and set by turning the wheel dial. The displayed value is set.
reply to this comment
Turn the wheel dial to select the item you want to set. Move the yellow indication (V) to select the item. Press the (O) on the control wheel. The value turns yellow. When the values are displayed in yellow, the values can be selected and set by turning the wheel dial. The displayed value is set.
spridmore64 (04/10/2008)
I tried that and the yellow indication wouldn't move! What setting am I supposed to have the dial that's on top of the camera? M, ISO, P, or Automatic?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (04/10/2008)
Sorry about that. M or ISO. P/Automatic will choose the ISO for you.
reply to this comment
What type of Batteries does the H7 use? (monkeygirl38 — 04/07/2008)
Does the H7 use regular rechargeable batteries or a special battery pack? I really haven't found much info on the batteries other than it doesn't seem to run them down very fast.
reply to this comment
Andrew Skinner (04/10/2008)
Dana,
This camera comes with a proprietary lithium-ion battery. Both the battery and charger come with the camera. If you decide to go with this camera (or any with a lithium-ion battery), make sure you fully charge the battery before first use. The manual that comes with the camera should give an estimated time for first charge. I have seen some batteries take up to 4-8 hours for their first charging time, so plan accordingly. Good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
reply to this comment
This camera comes with a proprietary lithium-ion battery. Both the battery and charger come with the camera. If you decide to go with this camera (or any with a lithium-ion battery), make sure you fully charge the battery before first use. The manual that comes with the camera should give an estimated time for first charge. I have seen some batteries take up to 4-8 hours for their first charging time, so plan accordingly. Good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
monkeygirl38 (04/10/2008)
Andrew,
Thanks so much for your relpy -- I have borrowed an H5 model from another dept at work to play with and try out and really like the camera -- but unfortuntately they know very little about the camera and have no idea what accessories it came with. They have regular AA batteries in it and it seems to run fine so I am glad to know it comes with rechargeable -- otherwise, that could get expensive!
Thanks again for your response!!
reply to this comment
Thanks so much for your relpy -- I have borrowed an H5 model from another dept at work to play with and try out and really like the camera -- but unfortuntately they know very little about the camera and have no idea what accessories it came with. They have regular AA batteries in it and it seems to run fine so I am glad to know it comes with rechargeable -- otherwise, that could get expensive!
Thanks again for your response!!
How can I transfer the pic from the H7 to my computer? (monkeygirl38 — 04/07/2008)
If Memory Stick only works with Sony products, I assume that means I can't instert it in my HP printer and laptop like I can my SD card that I currently use with my Kodak Easyshare. How do you transfer the pictures from the H7 to your computer, printer, laptop, etc? I love being able to pop out the card and just insert it without worrying with various cables. If cables are needed, are then including with the camera or are they a seperate purchase?
Thanks!!
reply to this comment
Thanks!!
Andrew Skinner (04/10/2008)
Dana,
You can actually get a USB transfer device ( amazon.com/Memory-Stick-Car... ) that is compatible with Sony memory sticks. The camera itself also comes with associated USB transfer cables. Good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
reply to this comment
You can actually get a USB transfer device ( amazon.com/Memory-Stick-Car... ) that is compatible with Sony memory sticks. The camera itself also comes with associated USB transfer cables. Good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
monkeygirl38 (04/10/2008)
WONDERFUL!! I wish the sony website would include all this in their descriptions! Glad to know that it comes with cables, but I would much prefer one of the USB transfer ports -- I just hate to have to keep up cables!
Thanks again!
reply to this comment
Thanks again!
Andrew Skinner (04/21/2008)
Dana,
I'm glad we could help. Please come back with any further questions or issues.
Andrew
reply to this comment
I'm glad we could help. Please come back with any further questions or issues.
Andrew
how do i set the shutter speed and how do i set the exposure? (droblin9101 — 03/27/2008)
i dont know how to set these 2 things
reply to this comment
Aditya D (04/01/2008)
This should be on pages 35 and 36 of the user manual with show you how to change the fstop (the shutter speed). This will automatically change the exposure for you. Hope this helps, if you have any other questions feel free to ask.
reply to this comment
what is equivalent lens length at maximum zoom? (dweinsto44 — 03/17/2008)
panasonic 18x is 504 mm, which is not 50% longer than 432 mm for the kodak z612, but only about 17%.
reply to this comment
Aditya D (03/17/2008)
It is a 31-465mm, with the 35mm equivalent, so your max zoom range is almost to the Panasonic zoom. This camera is listed to have a 15x optical zoom. Hope this helps, if you have any other questions feel free to ask.
reply to this comment
dweinsto44 (03/17/2008)
thanks. it is not that much longer effective length than my kodak z612.
no wonder they don't list them by equivalent mm lengths.
reply to this comment
no wonder they don't list them by equivalent mm lengths.
dweinsto44 (03/18/2008)
thanks
reply to this comment
Should I go for Sony H7 or Canon S5 IS ? (amitmotaval — 03/08/2008)
I don't own any of the above models. I want to have one, but I am confused between these two which one should I go for?
reply to this comment
Andrew Skinner (03/08/2008)
Amit,
I am a huge Canon fan, but I like the Sony H7 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) better between these two for a couple specific reasons. First, you have more optical zoom with the Sony 15x vs 12x. Having more flexibility with your zoom will allow for more felxibility with your photos. You won't find yourself wishing for extra lenses as much with this camera. It also has a wider ISO setting range. While a higher ISO will cause increased graininess in photos, it will help you get better shots in lower light situations. You might hear a lot of arguments on the downside of a high ISO, but I have found that using free software like Picasa or purchasing something like PaintShop Pro (which I use) will help reduce the graininess through noise reduction functions. I hope this helps.
Andrew
reply to this comment
I am a huge Canon fan, but I like the Sony H7 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) better between these two for a couple specific reasons. First, you have more optical zoom with the Sony 15x vs 12x. Having more flexibility with your zoom will allow for more felxibility with your photos. You won't find yourself wishing for extra lenses as much with this camera. It also has a wider ISO setting range. While a higher ISO will cause increased graininess in photos, it will help you get better shots in lower light situations. You might hear a lot of arguments on the downside of a high ISO, but I have found that using free software like Picasa or purchasing something like PaintShop Pro (which I use) will help reduce the graininess through noise reduction functions. I hope this helps.
Andrew
Larry (03/09/2008)
I'll offer a slightly different take on these two very good cameras. The most important thing to me is buying them at a place where you can exchange it if you change your mind after a couple weeks of using it. Second most important is that they both will zoom while taking video which very few other digital cameras will do. Third is that 12X vs 15X is not that big a deal since 12X is typically enough for shooting from well back in an auditorium. If you chose the S5is and need a little more zoom, you can always crop and enlarge in the computer (still shots only - not video). Fourth the difference between 1600 and 3200 ISO is mostly graininess and it is difficult to get rid of, IMHO. Lastly, the SonyH7 requires proprietary memory cards which are more expensive vs the Canon uses SD/SDHC cards which are cheaper per GB and readily available.
Other factors to consider: Canon uses AA size NiMH batteries vs Sony uses proprietary Lithium Ion
Canon has stereo sound vs mono on the Sony (best double check me on that one)
Canon has a hot shoe for adding an external flash (really depends on your style of photography)
Sony has a remote control.
Now you just have to weigh it all in the balance and decide what is important and what you can do without.
Also, be sure to try both of them in your hands in the store since sometimes that makes a HUGE difference.
Good Luck.
reply to this comment
Other factors to consider: Canon uses AA size NiMH batteries vs Sony uses proprietary Lithium Ion
Canon has stereo sound vs mono on the Sony (best double check me on that one)
Canon has a hot shoe for adding an external flash (really depends on your style of photography)
Sony has a remote control.
Now you just have to weigh it all in the balance and decide what is important and what you can do without.
Also, be sure to try both of them in your hands in the store since sometimes that makes a HUGE difference.
Good Luck.
joe doe (05/10/2008)
Larry pretty much hit the nail on the head with his summary. Personally I think the Cannon has better photos overall and is more of a professional type of camera. Also the Cannon is more flexible (because of the previously mentioned ability to use AA batteries, sd cards, and ordinary cables) and it is easier to use all of its functions.
The H7 seems a bit smaller and easier to manage than the Cannon S5 but the cannon also has the tilt lcd screen and a much better viewfinder. The Cannon also has a much better face detection system that actually locks onto faces (I have not been able to do the same with the Sony... it may be possible but I have not been able to get it to work).
I own the Sony H7 but if given the chance I would trade it in for a Cannon S5 in a heartbeat.
reply to this comment
The H7 seems a bit smaller and easier to manage than the Cannon S5 but the cannon also has the tilt lcd screen and a much better viewfinder. The Cannon also has a much better face detection system that actually locks onto faces (I have not been able to do the same with the Sony... it may be possible but I have not been able to get it to work).
I own the Sony H7 but if given the chance I would trade it in for a Cannon S5 in a heartbeat.
joe doe (05/15/2008)
I have been testing the Sony H7 more and more each day and I find my dissapointment growing.
The noise reduction scheme seriously robs the pictures of details... they look like they are paintings instead of crisp photos.
The lens is much wider than the Canon but it has some serious distortion.
Purple fringing is unebelievable for a camera of this price. I once gave my 3 year old son an old HP digital camera simply because it had too much purple fringing and this seems to be much worse!! (I can't afford to give this one to a 3 year old otherwise I would beg to have that HP returned!!).
The controls and menus are incredibly frustrating to use. Some settings are redundant others are buried... none of them make sense and the stupid design of the rotating dial makes it all so frustrating!
A lot of people give Sony way too much credit... the Sony name seems to have a blinding effect because if the H7 were made by HP or GE people would laugh at it.
If you can deal with the size and the weight of the Canon then it is the obvious way to go... another great option would be the panasonic TZ3,4,5. Personally I am looking at the Kodak z812... much lower price tage and seems to have more detailed photos and easier interface.
reply to this comment
The noise reduction scheme seriously robs the pictures of details... they look like they are paintings instead of crisp photos.
The lens is much wider than the Canon but it has some serious distortion.
Purple fringing is unebelievable for a camera of this price. I once gave my 3 year old son an old HP digital camera simply because it had too much purple fringing and this seems to be much worse!! (I can't afford to give this one to a 3 year old otherwise I would beg to have that HP returned!!).
The controls and menus are incredibly frustrating to use. Some settings are redundant others are buried... none of them make sense and the stupid design of the rotating dial makes it all so frustrating!
A lot of people give Sony way too much credit... the Sony name seems to have a blinding effect because if the H7 were made by HP or GE people would laugh at it.
If you can deal with the size and the weight of the Canon then it is the obvious way to go... another great option would be the panasonic TZ3,4,5. Personally I am looking at the Kodak z812... much lower price tage and seems to have more detailed photos and easier interface.
Can I use a memory card for a Kodak easy share for this camera? (drummoas — 02/28/2008)
I have a 4 year old easy share and I would like to know if I have to buy new memory cards. Thanks.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (03/03/2008)
No. Unfortunately, Sony relies on proprietary technology and you'll have to buy new memory sticks which only work in Sony products. One of my chief beefs with SONY.
reply to this comment
drummoas (03/03/2008)
thanks for the info
reply to this comment
I have started an e-commerce store, with jars of chocolate. I need a digital camera to take awesome pictures, indoors, of the jars. Can you help? (anneee — 02/18/2008)
My budget is $100-350 for the camera. I have also purchased a tabletop photo studio to assist in the process, and comes with a tripod. The pictures I have taken so far show reflection in some of the jars.
reply to this comment
steve mccall (02/20/2008)
hi anne
the camera i sugest is a camera from the panasonic lumix range.
in order to get great shot of of objects indoor you require a camera with good marco
facility, the panasonic cameras have special modes to achieve this
in my opinion these cameras give the best images for your price range.
i have a a lz3 and have used it on many times for close up work;
here is a link to a person who used a pansonic camera to photograph a box of chocolates.
reply to this comment
the camera i sugest is a camera from the panasonic lumix range.
in order to get great shot of of objects indoor you require a camera with good marco
facility, the panasonic cameras have special modes to achieve this
in my opinion these cameras give the best images for your price range.
i have a a lz3 and have used it on many times for close up work;
here is a link to a person who used a pansonic camera to photograph a box of chocolates.
anneee (02/21/2008)
Steve, that's exactly what I needed to know--thank you so much!
reply to this comment
steve mccall (02/21/2008)
hello Anne
good luck with your store
here is the link that was missing
flickr.com/photos/yuan2003/... here is a link to to tips on the subject
asmp.org/culture/bestof2007...
reply to this comment
good luck with your store
here is the link that was missing
flickr.com/photos/yuan2003/... here is a link to to tips on the subject
asmp.org/culture/bestof2007...
Does the H7 have JPEG file format? If so are there other options also? (Brysaac — 02/18/2008)
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (02/18/2008)
Yes, the still image format is JPEG. There is no RAW capability. There are some RAW hacks on the net on how to add it to your camera, but it involves hacking the firmware and most definitely voids your warranty.
reply to this comment
Best auto-mode??? (LMT — 02/17/2008)
I'm trying to choose between the sony H7 (or H9), the olympus 560, the panasonic FZ18, and the fuji 8000sd. I really am trying to stay away from canon--my A75 just died after 3 years (will only power on very sporadically). After incredibly good care, this is not long enough for me so I don't want to give canon any more of my business.
I know the panasonic gets excellent reviews from many sources (especially in terms of image quality), and I tried one out in a store. I didn't really like the "cheap" feel of it, and I don't like the fact that the flash doesn't pop up automatically (even on auto mode). I'm also looking for a camera that proces high quality images on auto mode--my spouse doesn't like to fool around much with settings.
Of the models I listed, what are your thoughts? I'm having a tough time deciding.
reply to this comment
I know the panasonic gets excellent reviews from many sources (especially in terms of image quality), and I tried one out in a store. I didn't really like the "cheap" feel of it, and I don't like the fact that the flash doesn't pop up automatically (even on auto mode). I'm also looking for a camera that proces high quality images on auto mode--my spouse doesn't like to fool around much with settings.
Of the models I listed, what are your thoughts? I'm having a tough time deciding.
Aditya D (02/20/2008)
I really like the Sony out of the cameras because it has the best Carl Zeiss lens along with the best processor (the same one used in their Sony Alpha SLR camera). This would provide very good picture quality. Also, it has the best in-camera features, including the best "auto-mode" with good face detection and auto-iso and ev correction. If you would like more details, or have any other questions, feel free to ask.
reply to this comment
joe doe (05/15/2008)
LMT,
If you take Cannon out of the picture you are really limiting your selection because there are some Cannon models which are tops in their class (Including the S5, G9, A590 to name a few).
The Fuji and olympus cameras are great but if you plan on using the zoom (anything over 5x) I would avoid them because they do not have optical image stabilization (only CCD shift or worse yet high ISO compensation). These methods are not enough to compensate for shake and will lead to blurry pictures.
The Panasonic models are pretty good, you may want to try the tz3, tz4, and tz5 models. They have 10x zoom and excellent photos in a very very compact package. Also these models are mostly automatic so they are very easy to use and get good results in auto mode.
As for the Sony... I personally own a Sony H7 and it is not a bad camera. The main problem that I have with it is that it tends to use a heavy noise reduction scheme at higher iso levels. What this leads to is a "painting" like effect when you exam the pictures up close. Of course this can be avoided by manually keeping the ISO level below 200 but this entails fiddling around with the camera. If the camera is kept in full auto mode it tends to shoot indoor photos (even in good light with the flash on) at ISO above 300 which causes the above mentioned problem.
The Kodak Z812 is lower priced and takes pretty good photos and has a ton of feature but it does not have the battery pack included so you will have to purchase it separately.
Frankly if you don't want to fiddle around with settings and want a superzoom go with the panasonic tz3... it has a great auto mode in a compact body with a 10x zoom and 28mm wide angle... cannot be beat!!
reply to this comment
If you take Cannon out of the picture you are really limiting your selection because there are some Cannon models which are tops in their class (Including the S5, G9, A590 to name a few).
The Fuji and olympus cameras are great but if you plan on using the zoom (anything over 5x) I would avoid them because they do not have optical image stabilization (only CCD shift or worse yet high ISO compensation). These methods are not enough to compensate for shake and will lead to blurry pictures.
The Panasonic models are pretty good, you may want to try the tz3, tz4, and tz5 models. They have 10x zoom and excellent photos in a very very compact package. Also these models are mostly automatic so they are very easy to use and get good results in auto mode.
As for the Sony... I personally own a Sony H7 and it is not a bad camera. The main problem that I have with it is that it tends to use a heavy noise reduction scheme at higher iso levels. What this leads to is a "painting" like effect when you exam the pictures up close. Of course this can be avoided by manually keeping the ISO level below 200 but this entails fiddling around with the camera. If the camera is kept in full auto mode it tends to shoot indoor photos (even in good light with the flash on) at ISO above 300 which causes the above mentioned problem.
The Kodak Z812 is lower priced and takes pretty good photos and has a ton of feature but it does not have the battery pack included so you will have to purchase it separately.
Frankly if you don't want to fiddle around with settings and want a superzoom go with the panasonic tz3... it has a great auto mode in a compact body with a 10x zoom and 28mm wide angle... cannot be beat!!
joe doe (05/16/2008)
Aditya,
The the sony does indeed share the bionz processor with the DSLR lineup... this processor is actually more of a hinderance than a help on the H7. The problem is that the Bionz processor is VERY agressive in providing noise reduction. Agressive to the point that if you look at your pictures at 100% enlargement faces will look like they are painted.
If you take a picture of landscape or trees you will notice (when zooming in on your computer) that the details are totally lost... you will not be able to see the leaves clearly at all when you look at them up close.
Compare that with the Cannon S5 which shows remarkable detail when you go at 100% zoom. Of course the canon shows more noise but a little noise is worth it if it means you will be able to see the details in a photo.
Don't get me wrong, the Sony does take good pictures if you want to stick to 4x6 or sometimes even 8x10 and if you do not zoom in on details. But at this price the sony is supposed to be an "advanced" camera for "advanced" users. The fact that they do not even allow for the option to turn down the noise reduction is a very big mistake for Sony.
I find that many people are wowed by the Sony name without really paying regard for how much they are spending and what they are getting in return. This H7 is the perfect example... it would be a great camera for around $200 but at $300+ it has too many tradeoffs. I have owned 3 sony cameras and all have been dissapointing for their price.
As for LMT's original question... again the fuji and olympus do not have stabilization so they are out of their league... I don't have any experience with the panasonic fz18 though it at least appears to have optical stabilzation so maybe that is your best bet.
reply to this comment
The the sony does indeed share the bionz processor with the DSLR lineup... this processor is actually more of a hinderance than a help on the H7. The problem is that the Bionz processor is VERY agressive in providing noise reduction. Agressive to the point that if you look at your pictures at 100% enlargement faces will look like they are painted.
If you take a picture of landscape or trees you will notice (when zooming in on your computer) that the details are totally lost... you will not be able to see the leaves clearly at all when you look at them up close.
Compare that with the Cannon S5 which shows remarkable detail when you go at 100% zoom. Of course the canon shows more noise but a little noise is worth it if it means you will be able to see the details in a photo.
Don't get me wrong, the Sony does take good pictures if you want to stick to 4x6 or sometimes even 8x10 and if you do not zoom in on details. But at this price the sony is supposed to be an "advanced" camera for "advanced" users. The fact that they do not even allow for the option to turn down the noise reduction is a very big mistake for Sony.
I find that many people are wowed by the Sony name without really paying regard for how much they are spending and what they are getting in return. This H7 is the perfect example... it would be a great camera for around $200 but at $300+ it has too many tradeoffs. I have owned 3 sony cameras and all have been dissapointing for their price.
As for LMT's original question... again the fuji and olympus do not have stabilization so they are out of their league... I don't have any experience with the panasonic fz18 though it at least appears to have optical stabilzation so maybe that is your best bet.
joe doe (05/16/2008)
Aditya,
I also forgot to mention that the much heralded Carl Zeiss lens is far from perfect. It has a significant amount of barrel and pin cushion distortion and it also has dark edges on the widest setting.
The worst part of this lens is that it has a LARGE amount of chromatic abberrations and purple fringing is also pretty common.
The 15x zoom is great and the 30mm wide is also nice but just because it Says Carl Zeiss does not mean that it is a great lens. Dont be fooled by the sony marketing propoganda!!
reply to this comment
I also forgot to mention that the much heralded Carl Zeiss lens is far from perfect. It has a significant amount of barrel and pin cushion distortion and it also has dark edges on the widest setting.
The worst part of this lens is that it has a LARGE amount of chromatic abberrations and purple fringing is also pretty common.
The 15x zoom is great and the 30mm wide is also nice but just because it Says Carl Zeiss does not mean that it is a great lens. Dont be fooled by the sony marketing propoganda!!
joe doe (07/21/2008)
LMT,
I just bought the panasonic tz4 and I must say the auto mode is excellent. The camera actually gauges your photo and decides which mode would be appropriate so all you have to do is point and shoot. The Sony takes great pictures as well but for no brainer photos the Panasonic cannot be beat. Not to mention it has a wider angle (28mm) though a less powerful zoom (10x)
reply to this comment
I just bought the panasonic tz4 and I must say the auto mode is excellent. The camera actually gauges your photo and decides which mode would be appropriate so all you have to do is point and shoot. The Sony takes great pictures as well but for no brainer photos the Panasonic cannot be beat. Not to mention it has a wider angle (28mm) though a less powerful zoom (10x)
what benefit would I get witht he H9 over the H7. I do mostly scenery, pets, kids. (bfenick — 02/15/2008)
reply to this comment
Andrew Skinner (02/17/2008)
Barb,
The largest differences between this camera is the fact that it has a 0.5 inch larger LCD screen and can take interchangeable lenses. With only about a $50 difference, I would see this as an opportunity to go with the H9 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) in case you want to expand what you can do with your camera. This camera will support more of what you want to do. Good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
reply to this comment
The largest differences between this camera is the fact that it has a 0.5 inch larger LCD screen and can take interchangeable lenses. With only about a $50 difference, I would see this as an opportunity to go with the H9 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) in case you want to expand what you can do with your camera. This camera will support more of what you want to do. Good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
bfenick (02/28/2008)
what about the H7, how is that diff. from H9 - the price is almost $100, what are you paying for? The camera
salesman told me the lens was not really Zeiss and I should go with the Panasonic Luminx Z8 instead. now I'm even more confused. He said the Luminx had a better Leica lens.
reply to this comment
salesman told me the lens was not really Zeiss and I should go with the Panasonic Luminx Z8 instead. now I'm even more confused. He said the Luminx had a better Leica lens.
Andrew Skinner (02/29/2008)
Barb,
The H7 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is not much different than the H9 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )(nothing that I can see that warrants a $100 price difference, though its a $50 difference here on DCHQ), and it actually gets better ratings. The H9 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) does allow for external lens hookups though, which can be nice when trying to do more with your camera.
Both Panasonic and Sony make good cameras. I'd be weary when a salesman tries to steer you in a direction you weren't originally interested in. Many times they are just trying to sell something they're overstocked in. What was the price difference of the camera? The Panasonic FZ8 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) does not have as much zoom or resolution as the other two cameras, though it may perform better in low light situations. If you like the price, it could be a viable option.
Andrew
reply to this comment
The H7 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is not much different than the H9 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )(nothing that I can see that warrants a $100 price difference, though its a $50 difference here on DCHQ), and it actually gets better ratings. The H9 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) does allow for external lens hookups though, which can be nice when trying to do more with your camera.
Both Panasonic and Sony make good cameras. I'd be weary when a salesman tries to steer you in a direction you weren't originally interested in. Many times they are just trying to sell something they're overstocked in. What was the price difference of the camera? The Panasonic FZ8 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) does not have as much zoom or resolution as the other two cameras, though it may perform better in low light situations. If you like the price, it could be a viable option.
Andrew
joe doe (05/15/2008)
The H9 has a much better screen than the H7 and its screen is also tiltable. The H9 also has a few more dedicated buttons on the camera itself so you do not have to hunt around the menus as much
The biggest difference between the 2 is that the H9 has a night shot mode. It is pretty signifcant but the photos it takes in this mode look like you took them with night vision goggles on!
If you can live with the lower res screen the H7 is a better buy.
reply to this comment
The biggest difference between the 2 is that the H9 has a night shot mode. It is pretty signifcant but the photos it takes in this mode look like you took them with night vision goggles on!
If you can live with the lower res screen the H7 is a better buy.
Is this camera compatiable with windows vista operating system (RashmiSrivastava — 02/15/2008)
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (02/15/2008)
That's a good question. Vista is so dicey that many users are either staying with XP or downgrading. But it should be able to work.
reply to this comment
RashmiSrivastava (02/21/2008)
thanks for the answer but this is working wit vista but it is dicey not compatiable with all the camera
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (02/21/2008)
Well, you want to invest abobut $20 in a USB memory card reader that handles Memory sticks. Connect it and simply take your card out and plug it in. The PC will read it as a drive and it's a simple drag and drop to get your pictures onto the PC for editing and printing. Much better than trying to trouble shoot driver issues.
reply to this comment
I am really confused whether to buy H7 or not by seeing mixed reviews, is it suitable for a person like me who is not a professional photographer?? (puspak — 02/08/2008)
reply to this comment
Andrew Skinner (02/14/2008)
This is actually a great camera for someone who is not a professional. It has a great resolution level for high quality prints, movie mode that records in HD format, and image stabilization and a high ISO setting that make low light photos easier. If this is within your budget, I'd say go for it.
Andrew
reply to this comment
Andrew
joe doe (05/15/2008)
Puspak,
It depends on what you are looking for in a camera. The H7 is lightweight, easy to hold, and realtively fast. The problem is the noise reduction scheme at higher ISO and also the fact that everything on the camera is proprietary.... meaning you will have to buy Sony memory, batteries, cables, etc.
If you want a more professional type of camera the cannon S5 is the best in this range but if you want an easy to use camera that has a big zoom then the panasonic tz3 gives some amazing results for its size.
reply to this comment
It depends on what you are looking for in a camera. The H7 is lightweight, easy to hold, and realtively fast. The problem is the noise reduction scheme at higher ISO and also the fact that everything on the camera is proprietary.... meaning you will have to buy Sony memory, batteries, cables, etc.
If you want a more professional type of camera the cannon S5 is the best in this range but if you want an easy to use camera that has a big zoom then the panasonic tz3 gives some amazing results for its size.
Trying to choose between Sony H7 to the Olympus SP-560? (lateeky — 02/04/2008)
I've looked through the specs on both of these. They seem to be pretty similar. Anyone have any thoughts on which is better?
Thanks.
reply to this comment
Thanks.
Andrew Skinner (02/14/2008)
Leandra,
I like the Olympus better because of the longer optical zoom capabilities. While the rest of the specs are very similar, I think that this capability gives you more flexibility with your photography. Good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
reply to this comment
I like the Olympus better because of the longer optical zoom capabilities. While the rest of the specs are very similar, I think that this capability gives you more flexibility with your photography. Good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
joe doe (05/15/2008)
The H7 is far better than the Olmpus due to one fact alone... the Olympus does not have optical stabilization. The olympus instead uses CCD shift and high iso to counter the effects of camera shake. These methods might work on a 3x zoom but are disasterous on an 18x zoom. You will have a lot of blurry photos when zooming.
I am not a big fan of Sony cameras (I own the H7 and I don't like its noise reduction at high ISO) but honestly the H7 is a very good camera if you keep the ISO level down and you will come out with far less blurry photos.
The lens on the Olympus is far more flexible than the Sony H7 (it allows for a wider 27mm as well as longer 18x zoom whereas the sony is 30mm and 15x). This is not a huge difference but it is noticeable. In spite of this, the fact remains that a great lens is useless if the camera takes blurry photos because of its lack of optical stabilzation.
reply to this comment
I am not a big fan of Sony cameras (I own the H7 and I don't like its noise reduction at high ISO) but honestly the H7 is a very good camera if you keep the ISO level down and you will come out with far less blurry photos.
The lens on the Olympus is far more flexible than the Sony H7 (it allows for a wider 27mm as well as longer 18x zoom whereas the sony is 30mm and 15x). This is not a huge difference but it is noticeable. In spite of this, the fact remains that a great lens is useless if the camera takes blurry photos because of its lack of optical stabilzation.
IS TELE PHOTO LENS USEFUL WITH H-7 HOW DOES IT INCREASE THE 15X ZOOM..? (mehreen — 01/16/2008)
I TRIED TO BUY TELE PHOTO LENS WITH THE SONY H-7...BUT FOUND THAT THE ZOOM DOES NOT INCREASE BEYOND 15X AND WHAT'S THE USE OF THE EXTRA TELE PHOTO LENS WHICH COST MORE THAN 150 DOLLARS..?
reply to this comment
Larry (01/17/2008)
I have been very happy to just shoot at maximum zoom, then download to my computer and crop and enlarge to get the amount of zoom desired. Unless you are printing poster size images that should be sufficient. Give it a try and see if the images are sufficient for your viewing pleasure.
reply to this comment
Andrew Skinner (01/25/2008)
Mehreen,
The external lens multiplies outside of the electronic connection when you connect it to this camera. The camera will say it is at 15x, but if you get a 2x teleconverter, it will be at 30x.
As for value for your dollar. It depends on what you want from the camera. If you're really looking to get some nature shots or close-ups in a sports arena, then an teleconverter will be useful. I would also recommend picking up a tripod or monopod if you want to do this though. At extended zooms, the camera is more open to camera shake. I hope this helps.
Andrew
reply to this comment
The external lens multiplies outside of the electronic connection when you connect it to this camera. The camera will say it is at 15x, but if you get a 2x teleconverter, it will be at 30x.
As for value for your dollar. It depends on what you want from the camera. If you're really looking to get some nature shots or close-ups in a sports arena, then an teleconverter will be useful. I would also recommend picking up a tripod or monopod if you want to do this though. At extended zooms, the camera is more open to camera shake. I hope this helps.
Andrew
Can I shoot Black and White pics on Sony DSC-H7? Please advise and if yes, how? Thanks, Andy (andylal — 01/04/2008)
reply to this comment
Said (01/05/2008)
Hello Andy. Hope you enjoy your Sony H7.
To capture picture in black and white just set your capture mode to P or other adjustable setting. Press menu and scroll down to color mode. Then scroll left or right untill you find BW symbol. Select it then Press menu again. You will shoot in black and white mode. Try it. Said Andong
reply to this comment
To capture picture in black and white just set your capture mode to P or other adjustable setting. Press menu and scroll down to color mode. Then scroll left or right untill you find BW symbol. Select it then Press menu again. You will shoot in black and white mode. Try it. Said Andong
andylal (01/05/2008)
Thanks so much for your timely response. The H7 is an amazing camera. I am very happy with it. I have clicked stills and video with it and it is of excellent quality. It is indeed real value for money! I also tried the black and white mode to capture stills. Sharp indeed. Thanks again.
reply to this comment
I was trying to take pictures of my kids when we went skating and they turned out dark and some were blurry. Some were good. What do I need to do? (Skennedy41 — 12/19/2007)
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (12/19/2007)
Well, I'm betting that you relied on the pop-up flash which is designed around portraits and small groups. So outside of about 7-10 feet, the flash dissipates to the point of being useless, with dark underexposed shots. Blurry can result from this as well since the auto functions will choose a much longer shutter speed than you would like. So don't rely on the "AUTO" setting. Try some of the presets like:
Advanced Sports Shooting, High Sensitivity, Snow, Twilight, Twilight Portrait.
reply to this comment
Advanced Sports Shooting, High Sensitivity, Snow, Twilight, Twilight Portrait.
Skennedy41 (12/19/2007)
Thanks, but I tried the Advanced Sports Shooting and the flash didn't go off and the picture was extremely blurry and dark. Now what? Do I need to change the shutter speed to "Burst" or whatever the setting is when I do Advanced Sports Shooting so it doesn't take as long to focus? Any other suggestions?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (12/21/2007)
I think what will help is prefocusing and panning with the action as you shoot your shots. Remember that shutter delay is a way of life in digital cameras. But the good news is that the delay is lessening as the technology matures. According to recent news articles, many camera companies will be incorporating the CCD chips they use in their SLR lines (which give no shutter lag) into their point and shoot cameras. So look for it within the next few years.
You shoot a shot, particularly in low light, you have to wait on the shutter lag, and also the shutter speed itself. It's easy to get a blurred image due to long shutter times, shutter lag, and camera shake in low light.
Burst modes won't really help as well as getting into the habit of prefocusing and panning with the action. Doing these can drop your shutter lag by as much as 80%.
reply to this comment
You shoot a shot, particularly in low light, you have to wait on the shutter lag, and also the shutter speed itself. It's easy to get a blurred image due to long shutter times, shutter lag, and camera shake in low light.
Burst modes won't really help as well as getting into the habit of prefocusing and panning with the action. Doing these can drop your shutter lag by as much as 80%.
Skennedy41 (12/21/2007)
Thanks. I will be sure to look for the CCD Chip when it comes out.
reply to this comment
have a coolpix now and sports shots are always blurred. how is the h7 in this respect? (warrior6 — 12/14/2007)
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (12/14/2007)
I don't know if it's the camera so much as it is your technique to be honest. Let me explain. Yes, you're dealing with shutter lag. But that isn't going to change with the H7. Shutter delay is a way of life in point and shoot digital cameras. But the good news is that the delay is lessening as the technology matures. And what's interesting is, that DSLRs dont' have a lag issue at all. Or, it's nearly non existent.
The good news is that according to recent news articles, many camera companies will be incorporating the CCD chips they use in their SLR lines (which give no shutter lag) into their point and shoot cameras. So look for it within the next few years.
Meantime, there are also other tips to speed up your performance:
1. Prefocus. Hold down the shutter half way to get a prefocus of the image you're shooting. When it changes, prefocus again. This will speed up your camera's performance during picture taking since it won't have to autofocus before it shoots the shot.
2. Use faster SD cards. Yes, there are faster cards and it does make a difference in writing the image file to the card. This is especially key if you're taking multiple or burst images.
3. Fresher batteries. Use alkalines at least. But I recommend using high energy batteries designed for digital photography. Varta is a good brand. They are usually sold in camera shops, are long lasting (because they are sold in small quantities) put out alot of energy.
4. Shoot in "sports" modes when you're in situations that require action. Night or available light modes when in night time settings. These presets can help in speeding up your shots, rather than the camera taking a split second to evaluate the conditions of the lighting.
5. Go manual. If you are manually focusing, particularly in darker settings, you can constantly refocus the image as things happen. Also, the infrared does have a range and if your image is out of that range you can end up with the camera's "best guess" or infinity setting which may not help. You can also go manual on fstops and shutter speeds as well, getting more light faster when you choose.
6. Go with a shallow depth of field.
7. Pan with the action. You can create some pretty cool shots by panning with your shot, focusing on your subject. This will create the effect of your subject in sharp contrast to the blurry background.
8. Use a flash - even in day time. This will "freeze" the image and cause your subject to "pop" in the shot. However, flash is only designed for limited range and can dissipate outside of about 20-25 feet unless you're using a zoomable flash.
9. Stick with 100-400 ISO. Going higher will cause more noise/grain in your shots, particularly in darker settings.
Make these a habitual part of your technique and you'll cut your shutter lag by as much as 80% no matter what camera you use (except for DSLRs, of course, since they don't have the lag).
Now, if you want greater zoom range. Then we can talk the H7. Course, I'd rather talk the SP560UZ ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ).
reply to this comment
The good news is that according to recent news articles, many camera companies will be incorporating the CCD chips they use in their SLR lines (which give no shutter lag) into their point and shoot cameras. So look for it within the next few years.
Meantime, there are also other tips to speed up your performance:
1. Prefocus. Hold down the shutter half way to get a prefocus of the image you're shooting. When it changes, prefocus again. This will speed up your camera's performance during picture taking since it won't have to autofocus before it shoots the shot.
2. Use faster SD cards. Yes, there are faster cards and it does make a difference in writing the image file to the card. This is especially key if you're taking multiple or burst images.
3. Fresher batteries. Use alkalines at least. But I recommend using high energy batteries designed for digital photography. Varta is a good brand. They are usually sold in camera shops, are long lasting (because they are sold in small quantities) put out alot of energy.
4. Shoot in "sports" modes when you're in situations that require action. Night or available light modes when in night time settings. These presets can help in speeding up your shots, rather than the camera taking a split second to evaluate the conditions of the lighting.
5. Go manual. If you are manually focusing, particularly in darker settings, you can constantly refocus the image as things happen. Also, the infrared does have a range and if your image is out of that range you can end up with the camera's "best guess" or infinity setting which may not help. You can also go manual on fstops and shutter speeds as well, getting more light faster when you choose.
6. Go with a shallow depth of field.
7. Pan with the action. You can create some pretty cool shots by panning with your shot, focusing on your subject. This will create the effect of your subject in sharp contrast to the blurry background.
8. Use a flash - even in day time. This will "freeze" the image and cause your subject to "pop" in the shot. However, flash is only designed for limited range and can dissipate outside of about 20-25 feet unless you're using a zoomable flash.
9. Stick with 100-400 ISO. Going higher will cause more noise/grain in your shots, particularly in darker settings.
Make these a habitual part of your technique and you'll cut your shutter lag by as much as 80% no matter what camera you use (except for DSLRs, of course, since they don't have the lag).
Now, if you want greater zoom range. Then we can talk the H7. Course, I'd rather talk the SP560UZ ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ).
warrior6 (12/20/2007)
James, What a great rundown! I appreciate your expertise and response. I probably missstated my question so let me clarify. My Coolpix has no image stab. I do shoot in the sports mode and any subject movement blurs even if the camera is on a tripod. I liked Nikon products as I still have my old FE SLR which I purchased while stationed in Germany and while it is excellent I had hoped to move to a digital 'advanced' or SLR and give the L1 to my wife for pics of the grandkids etc. I have researched quite a bit and am leaning toward the Canon G9. I can't seem to find a reasonably priced Nikon with image stabilization. I truly appreciate the depth and candor of your response and look forward to your thoughts on my dilema and planned purchase.
Dave
reply to this comment
Dave
by James DeRuvo (12/21/2007)
Thanks Colonel. The G9 is a great camera, but if you're only shooting snapshots it may be overkill for the price. It has 12MP resolution, but for snapshots you'll never really see the benefit of those 12 MP unless you're enlarging to above 8x10. It's kinda like having a Lamborghini and driving on US freeways. It's cool to have, but you never really experience the benefit. Great camera though.
Nikon has several models ( nikonusa.com/announcement_c... ) which incorporate optical image stabilization. The G9 equivalent is the P5100 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). But there's also the S510, S700, S51 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), and the L15 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) to name a few.
reply to this comment
Nikon has several models ( nikonusa.com/announcement_c... ) which incorporate optical image stabilization. The G9 equivalent is the P5100 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). But there's also the S510, S700, S51 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), and the L15 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) to name a few.
warrior6 (12/31/2007)
Thanks for your help James, I am going to continue my search and have included the Lumix FZ 18, Sony H7 etc...have a great New Year.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (01/03/2008)
One thing, Colonel, unless your camera has a larger CCD, 12 MP may give you more noise than you bargain for. Check out this article ( 6mpixel.org/en/? ) which puts forth the argument that more MP in a point and shoot camera is not necessarily better. The argument stems from dividing the chip into smaller and smaller pixels making it less sensitive to light and as such, inviting more noise.
reply to this comment
i was going to get a DSLR :-(, but I found out I don't have enough money. So should I get this or the SX100 IS? (Thomas S. — 12/13/2007)
I want a fairly compact ultrazoom that is under $300. I want one with optical image stabilization. I don't really want a Kodak.
I have ruled out the Sony H3 and the Panasonic TZ3 since they don't have full manual control. I am considering the Canon SX100 IS or the Sony H7. Which is better?
reply to this comment
I have ruled out the Sony H3 and the Panasonic TZ3 since they don't have full manual control. I am considering the Canon SX100 IS or the Sony H7. Which is better?
by James DeRuvo (12/14/2007)
Why not just be patient and save up for what you really want? New models will be announced at CES in January. Prices will drop soon after that. Meanwhile, keep saving and take the dive into the DSLR world.
reply to this comment
Pictures came out blotchy and HORRIBLE when printed..... (Cahki — 12/08/2007)
When I went to print out my pics they ALL came out blurry and blotchy but looked great on the camera and my computer....I had the image size thingy at 5M (no idea what that means). I also use iPhoto to upload my pictures. When I was at the store later, the machine said something about the resolution.....I am so bad with this new camera....Thanks for any help.
reply to this comment
Aditya D (12/09/2007)
What may be happening is that your resolution settings are set lower than the camera capacity (5M probably stands for 5 megapixels), so try setting the camera to a higher resolution (in the menu options of the Sony H7, should be the first one). Resolution refers to the quality of the picture, and a lower resolution will results in worst looking pictures. Try printing from a different place, like a RitzCamera/Wolf Camera, or even a Walgreens, Walmart, or general store of the sort. See if you get the same problems. It may be a compatibility issue with the camera. If you can give us more details about the error, we may be able to further help you. If there are any other questions you have, or this happens repeatedly, feel free to contact us through this thread.
reply to this comment
would you recommend this camera for taking pictures of soccer (spanky — 12/06/2007)
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (12/08/2007)
It should work fine. You want to make sure though you get into the habit of doing a few things:
1. Prefocus. Hold down the shutter half way to get a prefocus of the image you're shooting. When it changes, prefocus again. This will speed up your camera's performance during picture taking since it won't have to autofocus before it shoots the shot.
2. Use faster SD cards. Yes, there are faster cards and it does make a difference in writing the image file to the card. This is especially key if you're taking multiple or burst images.
3. Fresher batteries. Use alkalines at least. But I recommend using high energy batteries designed for digital photography. Varta is a good brand. They are usually sold in camera shops, are long lasting (because they are sold in small quantities) put out alot of energy.
4. Shoot in "sports" modes when you're in situations that require action. Night or available light modes when in night time settings. These presets can help in speeding up your shots, rather than the camera taking a split second to evaluate the conditions of the lighting.
5. Go manual. If you are manually focusing, particularly in darker settings, you can constantly refocus the image as things happen. Also, the infrared does have a range and if your image is out of that range you can end up with the camera's "best guess" or infinity setting which may not help. You can also go manual on fstops and shutter speeds as well, getting more light faster when you choose.
6. Go with a shallow depth of field.
7. Pan with the action. You can create some pretty cool shots by panning with your shot, focusing on your subject. This will create the effect of your subject in sharp contrast to the blurry background.
8. Use a flash - even in day time. This will "freeze" the image and cause your subject to "pop" in the shot. However, flash is only designed for limited range and can dissipate outside of about 20-25 feet unless you're using a zoomable flash.
9. Stick with 100-400 ISO. Going higher will cause more noise/grain in your shots, particularly in darker settings.
reply to this comment
1. Prefocus. Hold down the shutter half way to get a prefocus of the image you're shooting. When it changes, prefocus again. This will speed up your camera's performance during picture taking since it won't have to autofocus before it shoots the shot.
2. Use faster SD cards. Yes, there are faster cards and it does make a difference in writing the image file to the card. This is especially key if you're taking multiple or burst images.
3. Fresher batteries. Use alkalines at least. But I recommend using high energy batteries designed for digital photography. Varta is a good brand. They are usually sold in camera shops, are long lasting (because they are sold in small quantities) put out alot of energy.
4. Shoot in "sports" modes when you're in situations that require action. Night or available light modes when in night time settings. These presets can help in speeding up your shots, rather than the camera taking a split second to evaluate the conditions of the lighting.
5. Go manual. If you are manually focusing, particularly in darker settings, you can constantly refocus the image as things happen. Also, the infrared does have a range and if your image is out of that range you can end up with the camera's "best guess" or infinity setting which may not help. You can also go manual on fstops and shutter speeds as well, getting more light faster when you choose.
6. Go with a shallow depth of field.
7. Pan with the action. You can create some pretty cool shots by panning with your shot, focusing on your subject. This will create the effect of your subject in sharp contrast to the blurry background.
8. Use a flash - even in day time. This will "freeze" the image and cause your subject to "pop" in the shot. However, flash is only designed for limited range and can dissipate outside of about 20-25 feet unless you're using a zoomable flash.
9. Stick with 100-400 ISO. Going higher will cause more noise/grain in your shots, particularly in darker settings.
I bought the sony dsc-h7 what size mem card and speed of card? (jeffo — 12/04/2007)
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (12/04/2007)
Allow me to make an pitch for using several cards, rather than one large one. Reason being, insurance. Any memory card can fail or become corrupted. And when you're on vacation the last thing you want is to lose the opportunity to take pictures until you can recover that media card with a software utility. If your card goes bad, swapping another one for it at that moment is of advantage so you can keep taking pics. Then, later when you're in front of your PC, you can use a utility like "F-Recovery" ( [url=filerecoverytools.com/produ... ) to get back your pictures and recover your card.
No need to lose the moment because you relied on one card one when several can solve that problem. At the very least, you want to get more than one of whatever size you settle on.
One last thing. Cards have different speeds. The faster a card is, the quicker it'll save the photo and cycle to be ready for another shot. In the end, your camera is only going to be as fast as it's slowest link in the chain. So check for speed when you purchase a card.
reply to this comment
No need to lose the moment because you relied on one card one when several can solve that problem. At the very least, you want to get more than one of whatever size you settle on.
One last thing. Cards have different speeds. The faster a card is, the quicker it'll save the photo and cycle to be ready for another shot. In the end, your camera is only going to be as fast as it's slowest link in the chain. So check for speed when you purchase a card.
joe doe (05/10/2008)
Most of the Sony mem stick pro duos are pretty much the same speed and they work fine in the sony h7. Sandisk does make some high speed mem stick pro duos which may be worth it if they are just a few bucks more but I would not pay significantly more for those because the benefit will really not be that great in the H7. The high speed cards may come in handy when you transfer pictures to your computer or if later on you buy a camera or camcorder that can make use of the faster read and write times but honestly the regular speed mem stick pro duo cards work fine in the H7.
As for size, I think 2gb is the sweet spot between price and capacity. The 4gb cards are still pretty expensive and the 1gb cards will mean you have to change frequently so stick with a couple of 2gb cards and you should be fine.
One thing you may want to keep in mind.... there are many fake memory stick pro duo cards out in the market (mostly on ebay). They look just like the original (even the packaging is very similar) but they perform horribly and their quality is terrible. I recently made the mistake of buying fake sony 4gb card only to have the top of the card come off when I tried to remove it from my card reader. Make sure you buy original!!
reply to this comment
As for size, I think 2gb is the sweet spot between price and capacity. The 4gb cards are still pretty expensive and the 1gb cards will mean you have to change frequently so stick with a couple of 2gb cards and you should be fine.
One thing you may want to keep in mind.... there are many fake memory stick pro duo cards out in the market (mostly on ebay). They look just like the original (even the packaging is very similar) but they perform horribly and their quality is terrible. I recently made the mistake of buying fake sony 4gb card only to have the top of the card come off when I tried to remove it from my card reader. Make sure you buy original!!
joe doe (07/21/2008)
I just bought a micro sd to memory stick duo adapter. This thing lets me use my micro sd cards in my Sony H7 so I end up saving a fortune because a 2gb micro sd can be had for less than $10 bucks wheras a 2Gb sony pro duo costs over $20!! Here is a link to a review for this adapter...
hubpages.com/hub/How-to-use...
reply to this comment
hubpages.com/hub/How-to-use...
I noticed the image size when I uploaded to my PC was around 2 MP, however on the camera it was set to 8 MP. Why is that ? how do get it save as an 8M (gerryc94560 — 11/28/2007)
image size is 2 MP on PC, not matching the setting on Camera of 8 MP.
reply to this comment
Andrew Skinner (11/28/2007)
Gerry,
The 8MP is the resolution of the photo (8million pixels per inch). The 2 M is for megabytes, the size of the file. If you have the camera set to 8MP, the images are in that format. I hope this helps.
Andrew
reply to this comment
The 8MP is the resolution of the photo (8million pixels per inch). The 2 M is for megabytes, the size of the file. If you have the camera set to 8MP, the images are in that format. I hope this helps.
Andrew
How to set shutterspeed slower than 30 secs (hariharan — 11/15/2007)
Shutterspeed given is upto 30 secs in manual mode. How do I set shutterspeeds slower or keep shutter open. Like the B position in film camera. I need this to shoot things like lunar eclipse to capture multiple images on same frame
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (11/16/2007)
According to the specs, that's it. It has no "bulb" feature.
reply to this comment
Parts of my pictures are blurry, parts are focused. What is wrong? (corsbie2006 — 10/30/2007)
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (10/30/2007)
First thing I would do is reset the camera. This is a fairly easy procedure which involves either going into your setup menu and choosing "reset," holding down the menu key for 5 seconds, or, removing the batteries for a few minutes. It may be that the firmware loading got corrupted and the camera just needs to be "rebooted," which is something that turning it on/off won't accomplish. But after which, you should have the camera reset to factory default settings. Another tip is to go to SONY's website and look for firmware updates. Download and install them.
I'd also clean your lens element as it can easily become smudged and dirty. You may even not realize it. If you have a 1A filter on the front, remove it and clean both sides and the lens element itself. If you don't have one, get one. Best insurance policy against impact damage you can have.
reply to this comment
I'd also clean your lens element as it can easily become smudged and dirty. You may even not realize it. If you have a 1A filter on the front, remove it and clean both sides and the lens element itself. If you don't have one, get one. Best insurance policy against impact damage you can have.
Sony DSC H3 vs H7 (YWC — 10/21/2007)
Hi,
I am looking for a camera so that I can take photos for my kid while he is running around or jumping around. My old P73 often takes blur photos when he moves. I have following questions.
1. Can both Sony H3 and H7 perform this function? Which one can do a better job?
2. H7 has 100 continuous shot function, how about H3?
3. Is this continuous shot really help?
I would really appreciate if someone can answer my questions.
reply to this comment
I am looking for a camera so that I can take photos for my kid while he is running around or jumping around. My old P73 often takes blur photos when he moves. I have following questions.
1. Can both Sony H3 and H7 perform this function? Which one can do a better job?
2. H7 has 100 continuous shot function, how about H3?
3. Is this continuous shot really help?
I would really appreciate if someone can answer my questions.
by James DeRuvo (10/22/2007)
Well sadly, just changing the camera isn't going to do the trick. Point and shoot cameras are doing to have shutter delay. It's simply the nature of the beast. The good news is that according to recent news articles, many camera companies will be incorporating the CCD chips they use in their SLR lines (which give no shutter lag) into their point and shoot cameras. So look for it within the next few years.
Meantime, what you need to do is change the way you shoot the shot in order to minimize that budding little "Flash" (the Superhero) you've gotten running around making all your shots blurry:
1. Prefocus. Hold down the shutter half way to get a prefocus of the image you're shooting. When it changes, prefocus again. This will speed up your camera's performance during picture taking since it won't have to autofocus before it shoots the shot.
2. Use faster SD cards. Yes, there are faster cards and it does make a difference in writing the image file to the card. This is especially key if you're taking multiple or burst images.
3. Fresher batteries. Use alkalines at least. But I recommend using high energy batteries designed for digital photography. Varta is a good brand. They are usually sold in camera shops, are long lasting (because they are sold in small quantities) put out alot of energy.
4. Shoot in "sports" or "kids" modes when you're in situations that require action. Night or available light modes when in night time settings. These presets can help in speeding up your shots, rather than the camera taking a split second to evaluate the conditions of the lighting.
5. Go manual. If you are manually focusing, particularly in darker settings, you can constantly refocus the image as things happen. Also, the infrared does have a range and if your image is out of that range you can end up with the camera's "best guess" or infinity setting which may not help. You can also go manual on fstops and shutter speeds as well, getting more light faster when you choose.
6. Go with a shallow depth of field.
7. Pan with the action. You can create some pretty cool shots by panning with your shot, focusing on your subject. This will create the effect of your subject in sharp contrast to the blurry background.
8. Use a flash - even in day time. This will "freeze" the image and cause your subject to "pop" in the shot. However, flash is only designed for limited range and can dissipate outside of about 20-25 feet unless you're using a zoomable flash.
9. Stick with 100-400 ISO. Going higher will cause more noise/grain in your shots, particularly in darker settings.
As for which one to get. I'm not much of a SONY fan since they rely on proprietary technologies such as the memory stick which I believe paints their users into a technological corner. However, since you already use SONY, it makes sense for you to stay in the family. Both are going to yield similar results. Almost exactly, in fact. With the exception of whistles and bells which you may like over the other.
Continuous shooting will help alot. Burst modes are one of the ways you can capture that speedy little devil.
In the end, when trying to make a final call, it may just come down to what camera feels good in your hand. Go to a local camera store and check both out side by side, holding them, feeling their center of gravity, the balance. How it sits in your hand. That usually sells me one way or the other. But in your case, they'll both be pretty similar again.
reply to this comment
Meantime, what you need to do is change the way you shoot the shot in order to minimize that budding little "Flash" (the Superhero) you've gotten running around making all your shots blurry:
1. Prefocus. Hold down the shutter half way to get a prefocus of the image you're shooting. When it changes, prefocus again. This will speed up your camera's performance during picture taking since it won't have to autofocus before it shoots the shot.
2. Use faster SD cards. Yes, there are faster cards and it does make a difference in writing the image file to the card. This is especially key if you're taking multiple or burst images.
3. Fresher batteries. Use alkalines at least. But I recommend using high energy batteries designed for digital photography. Varta is a good brand. They are usually sold in camera shops, are long lasting (because they are sold in small quantities) put out alot of energy.
4. Shoot in "sports" or "kids" modes when you're in situations that require action. Night or available light modes when in night time settings. These presets can help in speeding up your shots, rather than the camera taking a split second to evaluate the conditions of the lighting.
5. Go manual. If you are manually focusing, particularly in darker settings, you can constantly refocus the image as things happen. Also, the infrared does have a range and if your image is out of that range you can end up with the camera's "best guess" or infinity setting which may not help. You can also go manual on fstops and shutter speeds as well, getting more light faster when you choose.
6. Go with a shallow depth of field.
7. Pan with the action. You can create some pretty cool shots by panning with your shot, focusing on your subject. This will create the effect of your subject in sharp contrast to the blurry background.
8. Use a flash - even in day time. This will "freeze" the image and cause your subject to "pop" in the shot. However, flash is only designed for limited range and can dissipate outside of about 20-25 feet unless you're using a zoomable flash.
9. Stick with 100-400 ISO. Going higher will cause more noise/grain in your shots, particularly in darker settings.
As for which one to get. I'm not much of a SONY fan since they rely on proprietary technologies such as the memory stick which I believe paints their users into a technological corner. However, since you already use SONY, it makes sense for you to stay in the family. Both are going to yield similar results. Almost exactly, in fact. With the exception of whistles and bells which you may like over the other.
Continuous shooting will help alot. Burst modes are one of the ways you can capture that speedy little devil.
In the end, when trying to make a final call, it may just come down to what camera feels good in your hand. Go to a local camera store and check both out side by side, holding them, feeling their center of gravity, the balance. How it sits in your hand. That usually sells me one way or the other. But in your case, they'll both be pretty similar again.
ario barzan (01/07/2008)
hi
I'd like to know that finally which camera is better sony H7 or H3?
reply to this comment
I'd like to know that finally which camera is better sony H7 or H3?
ario barzan (01/07/2008)
i think h3 photos are sharper and more vivid than h7 is that true?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (01/07/2008)
I think they're going to be about the same, frankly. Although the H7 has a longer focal length with it's 15x zoom. But looking at their specs, they're very similar. For comparison, you may want to check out this resource ( imaging-resource.com/IMCOMP... ). It takes pictures with each and you can compare them side by side.
They don't list the H7, but they do list the H9 which is a slightly more expensive version of the H7 thanks to it's larger LCD screen.
reply to this comment
They don't list the H7, but they do list the H9 which is a slightly more expensive version of the H7 thanks to it's larger LCD screen.
Nasir (04/20/2008)
hi !
my hobby iz photografy n was using Sony P72 but now i want some high spc camea with focus control n with gud shuter speed but i am bit confuzed between H3 n H7 ! or i shud buy some other cam ???
reply to this comment
my hobby iz photografy n was using Sony P72 but now i want some high spc camea with focus control n with gud shuter speed but i am bit confuzed between H3 n H7 ! or i shud buy some other cam ???
joe doe (05/10/2008)
I tried the H3 and I currently own the H7 and hoenstly the H7 is much better. The H7 has a much longer zoom, much easier controls, and seems to take better photos though they are pretty similar. Also the H7 has dedicated viewfinder (albeit a very tiny one) and it allows you to zoom while shooting a movie.
Honestly for the price of a Sony H3 the Kodak z812 is is a much better buy and takes much better pictures. But the Sony H7 beats the kodak though it costs much more than the kodak.
reply to this comment
Honestly for the price of a Sony H3 the Kodak z812 is is a much better buy and takes much better pictures. But the Sony H7 beats the kodak though it costs much more than the kodak.
Wht setting I have to use for Beach photo shoot. (abhi — 10/21/2007)
Wht setting I have to use for Beach photo shoot.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (10/23/2007)
THe H7 does have a "Beach" setting. This will give you good settings to not only get blue water but get the subject as well. Make sure you don't find yourself in a back light situation (where the sun is coming into the lens). Shoot with the sun over your shoulder. You can also use a flash to make your subject "pop" in the picture. Even better, use a bounce card to bounce the ambient light onto your subject. You may also want to get a polarizing filter to cut on down UV.
reply to this comment
how much will this camera cost in srilanka (nusrideen — 10/14/2007)
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (10/15/2007)
We don't keep records on how much a camera costs from country to country. If you look in the upper right hand corner, you can see the prices in US Dollars from several of DHQs partner vendors. You can then take the amount and input it into a currency converter online to ascertain the ballpark price range in Sri Lankan currency. Google is your friend.
reply to this comment
joe doe (05/15/2008)
Your cost in Sri lanka may be much more than just the converted price. You have to factor customs and cost of importing it plus the additional markup by the local vendors.
You may find it cheaper to buy it from India (if you know anyone who is there) because there are a lot more Sony Vendors in India. Still the price in India is much more than the price we pay in the US or Europe becaues of the import duties.
reply to this comment
You may find it cheaper to buy it from India (if you know anyone who is there) because there are a lot more Sony Vendors in India. Still the price in India is much more than the price we pay in the US or Europe becaues of the import duties.
The 15x zoom was not as powerful as the 3 yr. old 12x model (jmiller07 — 10/04/2007)
Bought the camera today and tried it on the soccer field. My friend has the same camera, 3 years old, with a 12X zoom and she got closer shots than I did. I tried the sports mode and the auto mode(she was using). Should I be using the digital zoom? I thought the salesperson said not to use it. Does anyone know why there may be this difference in distance between the cameras. I bought the camera specifically for close up action shots.
reply to this comment
Matt (10/05/2007)
I'd need to know both types of cameras (I'm assuming yours is the H7?) The H7 is a 31mm-465mm zoom. I can't imagine a 12x camera of ANY type getting further zoom than your 15x.
I'll give you an example of when a 10x optical zoom can shoot farther than another 10x optical zoom. Consider a 28mm-280mm vs. a 35mm-350mm camera. Both have 10x zoom, because most advertised optical zoom is in regards to their range, not the typical 35mm multiplier. So whereas both these cameras are "the same" when you're reading the box, the telephoto side of the zoom is much further with the 35-350mm model.
However, a camera with 12x optical zoom could only beat your camera (all things being equal), if it matched your 465mm zoom. This could only happen if its zoom range is 38.75mm-465mm or higher (40mm-480mm, for example).
You'll need to find out her camera or the zoom range specs. Otherwise, all things being equal, she's using a little digital zoom to compensate for close pictures (which you generally never want to do, because you can always post-edit and get the exact zoom you want, without degrading your picture).
I should also mention, that if your friend has an SLR or dSLR, the zoom on the interchangeable lenses is generally more than specified because of how the dSLRs apply the zoom. It's always higher than what's shown. A 300mm lens on a dSLR, for example, could really be 360mm or more, sometimes.
Hope that helps!
reply to this comment
I'll give you an example of when a 10x optical zoom can shoot farther than another 10x optical zoom. Consider a 28mm-280mm vs. a 35mm-350mm camera. Both have 10x zoom, because most advertised optical zoom is in regards to their range, not the typical 35mm multiplier. So whereas both these cameras are "the same" when you're reading the box, the telephoto side of the zoom is much further with the 35-350mm model.
However, a camera with 12x optical zoom could only beat your camera (all things being equal), if it matched your 465mm zoom. This could only happen if its zoom range is 38.75mm-465mm or higher (40mm-480mm, for example).
You'll need to find out her camera or the zoom range specs. Otherwise, all things being equal, she's using a little digital zoom to compensate for close pictures (which you generally never want to do, because you can always post-edit and get the exact zoom you want, without degrading your picture).
I should also mention, that if your friend has an SLR or dSLR, the zoom on the interchangeable lenses is generally more than specified because of how the dSLRs apply the zoom. It's always higher than what's shown. A 300mm lens on a dSLR, for example, could really be 360mm or more, sometimes.
Hope that helps!
Said Andong (10/06/2007)
Jessie and Matt, In sony H7 , you can set your digital zoom to "smart" or "precision". Try to experiment on that and see the difference.
reply to this comment
jmiller07 (10/09/2007)
Thank you for both of your answers. My friend has the H1 model and her lens is definitely less powerful than mine. I brought the camera back to the store and found out if I shoot in the ISO mode rather than sports mode I will get better results as far as clarity. He agrees to post edit and not use the digital zoom for better resolution, however what I did not realize was that the precision mode extends the zoom to 25X. That may be what my friend has hers set on. I will experiment. Thank you both for your help.
Jessie
reply to this comment
Jessie
Matt (10/10/2007)
Precision mode still uses nearly a 2x digital zoom, but it won't be noticeable on 4"x6" prints, and especially not on just the LCD preview screen. Enjoy :)
reply to this comment
Switch off LCD Screen (snehasis — 08/28/2007)
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (08/28/2007)
Have you tried pressing the Finder/LCD button? It's to the right of the viewfinder and it will turn off the LCD and turn on the viewfinder. See page 18 of your manual.
reply to this comment
How can I participate to answer question posed by other users? (Said — 08/23/2007)
reply to this comment
Rich Watson (08/23/2007)
Write your answer in the ANSWER box, check spelling if you want, and then click on POST.
reply to this comment
Matt (08/23/2007)
Checking the spelling shouldn't be an option :oP
reply to this comment
Rich Watson (08/24/2007)
Too bad the site doesn't have a grammar checker; I need that badly. <<<SEE!!
reply to this comment
Said (08/24/2007)
Thanks guys. But i cant acess the answer box. There is only the question box. Here it looks. Wow i can't attach the pictures either. Nor can i insert the file. What shal i do next?
reply to this comment
Matt (08/25/2007)
It looks like you just did...(?) You can post answers to OTHER questions by clicking on the Open Questions in blue boldface on the Home page of this camera site. Otherwise, I'm not sure what else you're talking about. The main link is here: digitalcamera-hq.com/digita...
reply to this comment
Change image size (Said — 08/22/2007)
Sony H7 offers 8MegaPixel, but it took space on the mCard. How can I lower the size to 5Mega Pixel for example.
reply to this comment
Rich Watson (08/22/2007)
That should be covered in the owner's manual. Besides the resolution, you can usually change the compression ratio as well---that ratio affects the memory size needed to store a photo.
reply to this comment
Said (08/25/2007)
Thanks Richio. Infact i Just didn't scroll enough to find that option.
reply to this comment
Will D. (04/27/2009)
Sony H7 - How can I make the image size smaller, yet keep it at 8 Mega Pixel? The current image size is 45.33 x 34.00, so if I reduce an image to 5x7, it becomes pixelated.
reply to this comment
Does anyone know if it is possible to use a H-2 Lens Adaptor Ring in an H-7? (Johnnie — 08/10/2007)
I find the H-7 'flare' type adaptor ring unsatisfactory for a number of reasons. Is there such a thing as a 56mm to 58mm step-down convertor and could I use that to achieve my objective. Does super cheap carry these?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (08/10/2007)
I know this isn't much help, but it's a place to start. I have seen others on the net talking about Sony's 58mm to 56mm step-down converter tube, but I haven't used it. So you may want to talk to Sony about it.
reply to this comment
Johnnie (08/16/2007)
The H-7 (H-9) flare type adapter causes a shadow in close-up shots; it also makes it difficul attach the lens cap. Does anyone know about such a step-down tube?
Thanks,
Johnnie
reply to this comment
Thanks,
Johnnie
by James DeRuvo (08/17/2007)
I think that's just going to be the nature of moving down in size, John. You're going to get some sort of occlusion no matter what you use.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (08/28/2007)
Hi, I noticed that you haven't marked any replies as the "best answer." Are you still looking for an answer? If so, I recommend you re-submit it on digitalcamera-hq.com so it will have a better chance of being noticed. These days it looks like most questions are being answered within a few days. Good luck!
reply to this comment
Johnnie (08/28/2007)
Perhaps someone else has also experienced the problem. I would appreciate earing from you.
Johnine
reply to this comment
Johnine
What are the best settings to shoot the stars at night with? (jennsides — 08/09/2007)
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (08/09/2007)
Space.com ( space.com/spacewatch/astrop... )has a good article on astrophotography:
"Digital cameras:
Many people have found success photographing the night sky with digital cameras. But it's not as simple as it might seem.
One problem with consumer digital cameras is that if you leave the shutter open for more than a couple of seconds, you will start to get electronic noise in the image. A lot of digital cameras won't even let you open the shutter for more than a few seconds. According to Mike Durkin of New York's Amateur Observers' Society (AOS), digital cameras are good for bright objects that can stand some magnification.
"My first astrophoto with a digital camera was of the Moon," Durkin said. "I just pointed my camera at the eyepiece and clicked. Most of the pictures streaked because my hands weren't steady enough, but a couple were okay. The Moon is bright enough that you can get a so-so image this way. Since then I bought an eyepiece that threads directly into the camera."
Ken Spencer, a professional photographer and a member of the Astronomical Society of Long Island (ASLI) agrees. Spencer first tried digital astrophotography a few years ago with an Apple QuickTake 200, which was limited to 640x480 pixel images.
"Just for fun, I hand-held it over the eyepiece of my 6-inch f/6 homebuilt Newtonian reflecting telescope, and photographed the Moon," he said. "Sent the photo to a guy who had a website for users of the camera, and he was amazed. That was then, this was now, but that kind of photography should work for anyone.""
The article goes on to give some really good tips.
There's another article here ( fvastro.org/articles/digital/ ) that offers some tips as well.
reply to this comment
"Digital cameras:
Many people have found success photographing the night sky with digital cameras. But it's not as simple as it might seem.
One problem with consumer digital cameras is that if you leave the shutter open for more than a couple of seconds, you will start to get electronic noise in the image. A lot of digital cameras won't even let you open the shutter for more than a few seconds. According to Mike Durkin of New York's Amateur Observers' Society (AOS), digital cameras are good for bright objects that can stand some magnification.
"My first astrophoto with a digital camera was of the Moon," Durkin said. "I just pointed my camera at the eyepiece and clicked. Most of the pictures streaked because my hands weren't steady enough, but a couple were okay. The Moon is bright enough that you can get a so-so image this way. Since then I bought an eyepiece that threads directly into the camera."
Ken Spencer, a professional photographer and a member of the Astronomical Society of Long Island (ASLI) agrees. Spencer first tried digital astrophotography a few years ago with an Apple QuickTake 200, which was limited to 640x480 pixel images.
"Just for fun, I hand-held it over the eyepiece of my 6-inch f/6 homebuilt Newtonian reflecting telescope, and photographed the Moon," he said. "Sent the photo to a guy who had a website for users of the camera, and he was amazed. That was then, this was now, but that kind of photography should work for anyone.""
The article goes on to give some really good tips.
There's another article here ( fvastro.org/articles/digital/ ) that offers some tips as well.
jennsides (08/09/2007)
Thanks, I will try that website.
reply to this comment
Josh Vine (08/29/2007)
If it is the Sony H7 you have. You can leave the shutter open for up to 30 sec. If you don't have one already a tripod is something you should really invest in, because when you are shooting with long shutterspeeds you can't hold the camera still. It can also help create sharper images when you are shooting at full zoom. If you can't afford to be spending money on a tripod sometimes a support can be improvised such as setting the camera on the hood of you car and sitting on a sweater or numerous other possibilities. I'd experiment with using your manual settings and setting you f stop (F2.7, F8, F5.6 etc.) to the lowest number possible for the zoom length you are using and then adjusting the shutterspeed to what looks right. Starting around maybe 15-30 seconds if you are shooting more of the sky and then less if you are shooting just the moon. I hope this isn't too deep, is can be. I hope this is of help.
reply to this comment
Josh Vine (08/29/2007)
Oh, also two of the scene modes on this camera, Twighlight and Fireworks might be ok too.
reply to this comment
jennsides (08/30/2007)
Thank you Josh - That is exactly the kind of information I was looking for. The little book that came with the camera wasn't helpful at all! Thank you very much!!
Jenn
reply to this comment
Jenn
How is the quality of the movie clips? (wendysys — 08/01/2007)
How is the quality of the movie clips taken with a H7? Is the sound good when the camera zooms to the maximum (18x) during movie shooting?
Which camera takes better movies, Canon S5 or Sony H7?
reply to this comment
Which camera takes better movies, Canon S5 or Sony H7?
John Ml. (08/02/2007)
The Canon S family is well known for having the best video features in the digital camera world. Of course, remember Digital cameras are mainly for photos and yet they don't replace a video camera.
reply to this comment
How can one take black and white pictures using a Sony DSC H-7? (avkulkarni — 07/31/2007)
Hi,
Can anyone let me know how to take black and white photographs from this digicam? Is there any setting by which this can be done? Or such a feature is not avaliable in this camera?
Thanks,
Aditya
reply to this comment
Can anyone let me know how to take black and white photographs from this digicam? Is there any setting by which this can be done? Or such a feature is not avaliable in this camera?
Thanks,
Aditya
bukit97 (07/31/2007)
Press the Menu Button and you will have the choices for shooting.
Color Mode will be one of them and black and white will be the last choice under Color Mode.
It is not difficult to find and after trying once of twice you will get it.
reply to this comment
Color Mode will be one of them and black and white will be the last choice under Color Mode.
It is not difficult to find and after trying once of twice you will get it.
avkulkarni (08/01/2007)
Thanks a lot. That was really helpful.
reply to this comment
Why do the images that I click appear to be grainy? (avkulkarni — 07/31/2007)
Hi,
I shoot pictures with this new Sony DSC H-7 digicam of mine with 8MP setting, but when I see them on the computer, they appear clear when they fit to screen. But when I view the actual size of the picture, the picture then starts to appear slightly hazy and the boundaries of the objects do not appear as sharp. Is there any way in which this problem can be addressed?
Thanks,
Aditya
reply to this comment
I shoot pictures with this new Sony DSC H-7 digicam of mine with 8MP setting, but when I see them on the computer, they appear clear when they fit to screen. But when I view the actual size of the picture, the picture then starts to appear slightly hazy and the boundaries of the objects do not appear as sharp. Is there any way in which this problem can be addressed?
Thanks,
Aditya
John Ml. (08/02/2007)
Keep the camera set with the lowest ISO value and shoot under bright conditions or with flash(and under flash range). This grain is something which suffers most of new cameras because manufacturers are making cameras with more Mega pixels than what the image sensors can handle.
reply to this comment
Rezaul Kabir (08/06/2007)
While shooting with higher ISO, the image will be grainy as in the film cameras. Use of 1600 ISO Film in film cameras will give grainy images after a certain degree of enlargement. Use of lower ISO (below 200) give you a smoother picture. If retouched in Photoshop, the image may look smoother with certain loss of detail.
reply to this comment
Problem with makro and zoom. Please help! (inspire — 07/31/2007)
I have a problem with zoom. On the screen it is written that max zoom is 2,8 (I think I've already tried all kind of settings). How to make it at least 15??? Also makro does not work at all. Please suggest when it works
reply to this comment
bukit97 (07/31/2007)
On the top right hand corner of the camera, there is a rocker switch which serves as the zoom button.
Pressing it at the ' + ' side zooms on the subject and you get a larger picture.
Pressing it at the ' - ' side zooms out and you get a wide angle picture.
Macro is controlled by the left directional switch.
Look at the 4 directional switch on the right of the Screen. The left one has a logo of a flower on it. This is the macro switch.
Press this switch when you are in shooting mode and the camera will be in macro mode.
reply to this comment
Pressing it at the ' + ' side zooms on the subject and you get a larger picture.
Pressing it at the ' - ' side zooms out and you get a wide angle picture.
Macro is controlled by the left directional switch.
Look at the 4 directional switch on the right of the Screen. The left one has a logo of a flower on it. This is the macro switch.
Press this switch when you are in shooting mode and the camera will be in macro mode.
inspire (07/31/2007)
Thanks for your kind reply.
"Pressing it at the ' + ' side zooms on the subject and you get a larger picture" gives max 2,8 (Shooting settings/ Digital zoom / *smart* zoom). I wonder is there at least something more and what in that case 15x zoom means.
Macro does not work. It simply says all the time (when to press on a a logo of a flower on it) that it can not be used. Please suggest!!
reply to this comment
"Pressing it at the ' + ' side zooms on the subject and you get a larger picture" gives max 2,8 (Shooting settings/ Digital zoom / *smart* zoom). I wonder is there at least something more and what in that case 15x zoom means.
Macro does not work. It simply says all the time (when to press on a a logo of a flower on it) that it can not be used. Please suggest!!
bukit97 (08/10/2007)
If you get the buttons right and it doesn't work, it is possible that the buttons are faulty.
It could be a simple problem of dirt / water getting into the button and electrical contacts are lost.
Probably the camera has to go back to the supplier for servicing unless somebody else has a better explanation..
reply to this comment
It could be a simple problem of dirt / water getting into the button and electrical contacts are lost.
Probably the camera has to go back to the supplier for servicing unless somebody else has a better explanation..
inspire (08/15/2007)
Thanks. That's what I will do - go th the service centre. Thanks again for your reply and explanation :)
reply to this comment
What is the pitch of the 74mm filter thread in Sony H7 Or H9? (supercheapcamera — 07/19/2007)
reply to this comment
Ben Keough (07/25/2007)
Hi Supercheap,
I'm not sure I'm really following your question here. What exactly do you mean by pitch in this context?
Thanks!
reply to this comment
I'm not sure I'm really following your question here. What exactly do you mean by pitch in this context?
Thanks!
supercheapcamera (07/25/2007)
Pitch means the gap in the threads lengthwise. anyway i have found it now. this is 0.75mm. I am now selling a 74mm to 72mm step down convertor on ebay.
search.ebay.com.au/_W0QQsas...
reply to this comment
search.ebay.com.au/_W0QQsas...
Ben Keough (07/25/2007)
Ah, thanks for the clarification.
reply to this comment
Is there any underwater case for this camera? (Royce200313 — 07/17/2007)
I am looking for an underwater case for the Sony H7 anyone have any ideas?
reply to this comment
Brenda Paro (07/17/2007)
I don't think there is one. I know Ikelite makes <a href="ikelite.com/web_two/sony_h5... but I believe the bodies are too different for that to work for you.
reply to this comment
Matt (08/10/2007)
Per this site: digideep.com/english/digita... you have this camera, you can either add yourself to the E-mail notification list, or call Sony directly for any recent news (if there is any).
reply to this comment
What is the difference between 8 MP vs 3:2 image size? (longtimesonyuser — 07/09/2007)
I have tried and am satisfied with the 8 Mp image size. 16:9 is not as sharp as the 8 Mp.
reply to this comment
Ben Keough (07/12/2007)
Hi Roberto,
The widescreen (16:9) images produced by the H7 are 1920x1080 pixels, or roughly 2.1MP. This is why they look less sharp than the 8MP full-frame (3:2) images.
Hope this helps!
reply to this comment
The widescreen (16:9) images produced by the H7 are 1920x1080 pixels, or roughly 2.1MP. This is why they look less sharp than the 8MP full-frame (3:2) images.
Hope this helps!
Which is better Sony DSC-H7 Or Canon S3 IS? (SharathKA — 07/09/2007)
I am stuck. I am not clear which one to but out of these cameras.
Sony DSC - H7 is better in all the specs except it does not have flip & tilt LCD viewfinder, which S3 IS does.(Sony DSC - H9 has that option but costly).
But few friends are suggesting to go for Canon not Sony because Canon has very good experience in camera manufacturing than Sony, which is good at electronics.
Please help me out to decide.
reply to this comment
Sony DSC - H7 is better in all the specs except it does not have flip & tilt LCD viewfinder, which S3 IS does.(Sony DSC - H9 has that option but costly).
But few friends are suggesting to go for Canon not Sony because Canon has very good experience in camera manufacturing than Sony, which is good at electronics.
Please help me out to decide.
Brenda Paro (07/12/2007)
You know, ordinarily I would point you towards the Canon as well, because I believe firmly in their image quality and I think they beat out the other brands the majority of the time. But after spending a recent vacation traveling with someone who owned the H7, I've backed off that opinion a little in this case. This camera's image quality is really good. The only two warnings I would give you that might make you want the Canon are 1. if you zoom a lot, the H7 might have more purple fringing at the edges of the very long zooms (Canon will have some too, but probably a little less. This happens with all extended zoom cameras, but some handle it a little better than others); and the H7's menu and features are more confusing to access than the Canons. If the specs of the H7 still sound better, then I'd say go for it; it's a great camera.
reply to this comment
Which is better Sony DSC-H7 Or Canon S3 IS? (SharathKA — 07/09/2007)
I am stuck. I am not clear which one to but out of these cameras.
Sony DSC - H7 is better in all the specs except it does not have flip & tilt LCD viewfinder, which S3 IS does.(Sony DSC - H9 has that option but costly).
But few friends are suggesting to go for Canon not Sony because Canon has very good experience in camera manufacturing than Sony, which is good at electronics.
Please help me out to decide.
reply to this comment
Sony DSC - H7 is better in all the specs except it does not have flip & tilt LCD viewfinder, which S3 IS does.(Sony DSC - H9 has that option but costly).
But few friends are suggesting to go for Canon not Sony because Canon has very good experience in camera manufacturing than Sony, which is good at electronics.
Please help me out to decide.
Ajit (07/11/2007)
I have the same question as yours. I read a lot of reviews and dig very much but still I am not able to decide which one I should opt for. If you get an answer (with some reasons) please help me. My email id : ajitroyal@gmail.com
reply to this comment
ds (09/07/2007)
The Canon has a smaller LCD but it flips out and is handy for self portraits. It also records movies in stereo sound whereas I haven't seen that the Sony records in Stereo. The Canon also uses SD cards which are cheaper than Sony's memory sticks and more readily available. The Sony has the bigger zoom though and is about a year newer of a camera and is 8 megapixels while the Canon is a 6. There is also the Panasonic FZ8 that is comparable but much less expensive.
reply to this comment
gerryc94560 (11/28/2007)
I was comparing the sony H7 with the canon S5 IS
I had the same dilemma, I choose the SONY because:
cnet.com had a better review of it than the canon.
Also the zoom on the sony was more powerful
THe sony H7 has ability to shoot in HD mode and viewable on a TV, which I was interested since I recently purchased a 1080 P LCD TV.
I got a 4 GB sony pro duo memory card for about $35 - which is pretty damn cheap
If I had a couple extra $$$ I would buy the canon powershot G9 , a friend of mine got that and it is sweet.
reply to this comment
I had the same dilemma, I choose the SONY because:
cnet.com had a better review of it than the canon.
Also the zoom on the sony was more powerful
THe sony H7 has ability to shoot in HD mode and viewable on a TV, which I was interested since I recently purchased a 1080 P LCD TV.
I got a 4 GB sony pro duo memory card for about $35 - which is pretty damn cheap
If I had a couple extra $$$ I would buy the canon powershot G9 , a friend of mine got that and it is sweet.
joe doe (05/15/2008)
The cannon cameras generally take better photos than the Sony cameras. The S3 model is a lot older than the H7... you really should compare the H7 to the cannon S5 which is the replacement for the S3.
The biggest problem with the S3 is that the LCD is much smaller and honestly more difficult to view. On this basis alone the Sony is much easier to use. The zoom is not that much of a difference (between 12x and 15x) so just hold both in your hand and see which one feels better to you.
If you want the best go with the cannon S5... the S3 comes close but that tiny LCD screen becomes really annoying after a while. The H7 is a good choice after the S5
reply to this comment
The biggest problem with the S3 is that the LCD is much smaller and honestly more difficult to view. On this basis alone the Sony is much easier to use. The zoom is not that much of a difference (between 12x and 15x) so just hold both in your hand and see which one feels better to you.
If you want the best go with the cannon S5... the S3 comes close but that tiny LCD screen becomes really annoying after a while. The H7 is a good choice after the S5
max flash distance (Diamik — 07/01/2007)
I'm looking for a camera like the panasonic fz8. What brands out there will shoot flash 20'? Do I need to go with a hot shoe to get that distance? Thanks.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (07/12/2007)
Most point and shoot style cameras have a flash that operate best within 10 feet. After that, the light begins to dissipate almost exponentially. The advantage with some hot shoe activated flashes are stronger capacitors, and even a zooming capability to focus the light out into farther distances.
reply to this comment
I need speed and zoom but I do not want to change lenses like an SLR so I am torn between Sony H7 and Kodak Z712 any help on the best choice (cannjustme — 06/27/2007)
I need to shoot flying birds and get a clear shot also do weddings and need fast successive shots
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (06/27/2007)
Can I make it more difficult a choice for you? I am currently testing the Olympus SP-550UZ ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) and have so far been quite pleased with the results. 7.1 MP, 18x zoom, image stabilization and some great scene based program features including a 15fps burst mode. This is great for sports photography.
It also has in camera editing features such as cropping, sepia and black/white alerations, nite modes, super macro mode for REALLY close up shots, panoramic guides for shooting multiple shots to stitch into a panarama, even a mode for shooting documents.
I'm really enjoying it. If I had to complain, however, I have found the menu structure wanting and difficult to use on the fly. But other than that, it's a top notch camera.
I used it chooting birds in flight and got some great shots, even on burst mode. You can try using it for weddings, but the flash of any prosumer will be wanting ...
As for SONY, In my opinion, it's a good idea to steer clear of SONY, as they tend to force their customers into proprietary technologies such as the memory stick, their own spin on formatting, and a host of others which the Canon won't do. Canon relies on SD cards, which are pretty much the standard in point and shoot for memory cards. This means you can use any you happen to currently have and they are much cheaper than memory sticks. You can also use them in other technologies like PDAs, DMPs, and even mp3 players, whereas that memory stick is only going to be used in another SONY.
reply to this comment
It also has in camera editing features such as cropping, sepia and black/white alerations, nite modes, super macro mode for REALLY close up shots, panoramic guides for shooting multiple shots to stitch into a panarama, even a mode for shooting documents.
I'm really enjoying it. If I had to complain, however, I have found the menu structure wanting and difficult to use on the fly. But other than that, it's a top notch camera.
I used it chooting birds in flight and got some great shots, even on burst mode. You can try using it for weddings, but the flash of any prosumer will be wanting ...
As for SONY, In my opinion, it's a good idea to steer clear of SONY, as they tend to force their customers into proprietary technologies such as the memory stick, their own spin on formatting, and a host of others which the Canon won't do. Canon relies on SD cards, which are pretty much the standard in point and shoot for memory cards. This means you can use any you happen to currently have and they are much cheaper than memory sticks. You can also use them in other technologies like PDAs, DMPs, and even mp3 players, whereas that memory stick is only going to be used in another SONY.
cannjustme (06/28/2007)
I have a Canon 35mm and two nice lenses one 75-300 so I thought about the Canon XTI but I do not want a huge lens to lug on the camera that is why I am thinking about ultra zoom digital. I have a Sony digital camcorder so the memory stick would not be an issue I guess I am most interested in long zoom and little shutter lag for fast sequence shots is the Sony DSC H7 a good camera? I shoot most everything in auto modes I do not have the experience to set shutter and apeture before losing the shot.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (06/28/2007)
But these days, zoom lenses aren't as huge as they used to be. I'd hate to see you downgrade from SLR, but if you're certain you want to, cameras like the SP500Z can handle that.
reply to this comment
cannjustme (06/29/2007)
the 75-300 Canon lense I have is about 8 inches long fully extended and has some weight I just think having that around my neck for hours will be a bit much as weel as the lens on the camera that is why I thought that the other options might be better. I pretty much do everything point and shoot. I like the idea of NOT having to change lenses or carry several around
reply to this comment
Why is the Sony H5 more expensive than the H7? (eck — 06/22/2007)
reply to this comment
Andrew Skinner (06/23/2007)
Eckart,
There may be promotional sales on the new camera just because its new. If this is the camera you want to purchase, I'd go for it.
Andrew
reply to this comment
There may be promotional sales on the new camera just because its new. If this is the camera you want to purchase, I'd go for it.
Andrew
Is there a charger for the lithium-ion batteries that charges them using AA's? (eck — 06/20/2007)
Is there charger's for the Lithium-ion battery other than thee ol' wall plug so that when you are on the hunt for that elusive photo you aren't caught with your pants down...
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (06/22/2007)
I don't know of a battery charger that uses AAs to charge LiOns. You can, however, consider a solar option ...
reply to this comment
eck (06/22/2007)
thanks James, another question... does the H5 and H7 have larger converter lenses than the 1.7?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (06/22/2007)
Well, I don't know because I counsel against them. Reason being that you lose some clarity and about a stop of light when you use them.
reply to this comment
eck (06/22/2007)
maybe you can help me with this problem I've discovered... why is the H5 more expensive than the H7?
would you suggest staying with SonyH5/7 or looking at the Canon S3? I really want a camera with a super huge lens to help with surfing shots...
reply to this comment
would you suggest staying with SonyH5/7 or looking at the Canon S3? I really want a camera with a super huge lens to help with surfing shots...
by James DeRuvo (06/26/2007)
I suggest the Canon. In my opinion, it's a good idea to steer clear of SONY, as they tend to force their customers into proprietary technologies such as the memory stick, their own spin on formatting, and a host of others which the Canon won't do. Canon relies on SD cards, which are pretty much the standard in point and shoot for memory cards. This means you can use any you happen to currently have and they are much cheaper than memory sticks. You can also use them in other technologies like PDAs, DMPs, and even mp3 players, whereas that memory stick is only going to be used in another SONY.
If you really want a big lens in a prosumer, I am currently testing the Olympus SP-550UZ ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) and have so far been quite pleased with the results. 7.1 MP, 18x zoom, image stabilization and some great scene based program features including a 15fps burst mode. This is great for sports photography.
It also has in camera editing features such as cropping, sepia and black/white alerations, nite modes, super macro mode for REALLY close up shots, panoramic guides for shooting multiple shots to stitch into a panarama, even a mode for shooting documents.
I'm really enjoying it. If I had to complain, however, I have found the menu structure wanting and difficult to use on the fly. But other than that, it's a top notch camera.
reply to this comment
If you really want a big lens in a prosumer, I am currently testing the Olympus SP-550UZ ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) and have so far been quite pleased with the results. 7.1 MP, 18x zoom, image stabilization and some great scene based program features including a 15fps burst mode. This is great for sports photography.
It also has in camera editing features such as cropping, sepia and black/white alerations, nite modes, super macro mode for REALLY close up shots, panoramic guides for shooting multiple shots to stitch into a panarama, even a mode for shooting documents.
I'm really enjoying it. If I had to complain, however, I have found the menu structure wanting and difficult to use on the fly. But other than that, it's a top notch camera.
What are the ratings of a Sony DSC/H7/B? (marcy7815 — 06/20/2007)
I looked at this camera today. I am looking for a good camera with good zoom to take family shots. I would like to invest in a good camera that will take professional looking shots. What do you know about this camera? And what camera would you suggest? I looked at Canon and Sony and don't know which will take the best picture.
reply to this comment
Brenda Paro (06/22/2007)
Hi Marcy,
The H7 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is getting great reviews here, and I've heard lots of good things about its image quality. The only thing I'd be concerned about would be the actual physical camera itself- I have heard it said that it is difficult to handle as it has a somewhat unusual shape, and having handled it myself I tend to agree. So you may want to pick it up in the store and make sure you're comfortable with it before you buy one.
I can try to suggest a few more cameras if you'd like. You mentioned family shots and good zoom; any other factors? Price range?
reply to this comment
The H7 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is getting great reviews here, and I've heard lots of good things about its image quality. The only thing I'd be concerned about would be the actual physical camera itself- I have heard it said that it is difficult to handle as it has a somewhat unusual shape, and having handled it myself I tend to agree. So you may want to pick it up in the store and make sure you're comfortable with it before you buy one.
I can try to suggest a few more cameras if you'd like. You mentioned family shots and good zoom; any other factors? Price range?
marcy7815 (07/04/2007)
Brenda,
I have always loved photography. It has been a dream of mine to have aphotography business. I would like to have a goo camerato start with so maybe one day I can follow my dream. I do not want to spend more than $400.00
reply to this comment
I have always loved photography. It has been a dream of mine to have aphotography business. I would like to have a goo camerato start with so maybe one day I can follow my dream. I do not want to spend more than $400.00
Brenda Paro (07/05/2007)
Hi Marcy,
I think the H7 may be a fantastic choice for you. It doesn't sound like 'pocket sized' is high on your list of requirements, and as I said it's lack of compactness is really the only thing the H7 doesn't have going for it. In fact, I spent the past several days on a trip with someone who owned this camera and had a chance to use it hands-on, and can vouch for its professional results and speed.
Another camera you may want to consider is the Canon S3. I think image quality between the two will be comparable, but the S3 has a few slight differences, like an articulated LCD (REALLY nice to use) and what seems to be slightly better image stabilization. One more to glance at may be the Sony H9, the bigger brother of the H7 which has an articulated LCD as well (not sure if that one's within your price range though).
Try checking out the specs and reviews on those three; I think any of them would serve your purposes well.
reply to this comment
I think the H7 may be a fantastic choice for you. It doesn't sound like 'pocket sized' is high on your list of requirements, and as I said it's lack of compactness is really the only thing the H7 doesn't have going for it. In fact, I spent the past several days on a trip with someone who owned this camera and had a chance to use it hands-on, and can vouch for its professional results and speed.
Another camera you may want to consider is the Canon S3. I think image quality between the two will be comparable, but the S3 has a few slight differences, like an articulated LCD (REALLY nice to use) and what seems to be slightly better image stabilization. One more to glance at may be the Sony H9, the bigger brother of the H7 which has an articulated LCD as well (not sure if that one's within your price range though).
Try checking out the specs and reviews on those three; I think any of them would serve your purposes well.
Ron (12/08/2007)
can someone tell me what the difference is between the H7 and the H7/B?
reply to this comment
jeffo (12/10/2007)
Ron,
The H7/B is black, the H7 is silver
reply to this comment
The H7/B is black, the H7 is silver
I am a novice and want to take photos of a friend team roping. I would be shooting across an arena. Will the H7 meet my needs? (cj244 — 06/18/2007)
Will the H7 zoom in across an arena during team roping?
reply to this comment
Joe (06/19/2007)
With 15x optical zoom and great image stabilization this is one of the best cameras out there for shoot at a long distance. You will not be disappointed.
reply to this comment
How useful is Multipoint Auto Focus compared to Manual Focus ? or What is Multipoint Auto Focus? how much is for H7? (sanzen — 06/15/2007)
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (06/19/2007)
Well, personally, nothing beats the control you get with manual focus. But sometimes, the action happens so quickly, that you need to get the shot fast. That's where Multipoint Auto Focus comes in quite handy.
This means that a camera equipped with MPAF will have the most autofocus (AF) points to focus with. This increases the likelyhood you'll get a sharply-focused photograph in situations where the subject travels across the frame at high speeds, e.g. sports, birds.
Having so many AF points also helps relieve the photographer from having to use the 'lock focus and recompose' method of framing a photograph, since the subject will most probably have been picked up by one or more of the AF points.
As for the cost of the H7 - it's listed here ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) by the Venors as costing anywhere between $360-380 USD. I'm sure you'll find other prices, but that's a good place to start.
reply to this comment
This means that a camera equipped with MPAF will have the most autofocus (AF) points to focus with. This increases the likelyhood you'll get a sharply-focused photograph in situations where the subject travels across the frame at high speeds, e.g. sports, birds.
Having so many AF points also helps relieve the photographer from having to use the 'lock focus and recompose' method of framing a photograph, since the subject will most probably have been picked up by one or more of the AF points.
As for the cost of the H7 - it's listed here ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) by the Venors as costing anywhere between $360-380 USD. I'm sure you'll find other prices, but that's a good place to start.
sanzen (06/20/2007)
If I plan to buy a Camera, which one would you suggest me to buy, Canon 5S IS(Manual Focus) or Sony H7(MPAF) ?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (06/22/2007)
To be honest, I'm biased against SONY due to their obsession with locking their customers into proprietary technology like memory sticks and custom formats. I'd much rather go with Canon as they are more open source friendly. IMHO, of course.
reply to this comment
samrina (06/27/2007)
I absolutely agree with James. No qualms about sony's quality. But their memory sticks, they cost so much more than Secure Digital and Flash compact cards!! i rather stick to Canon or Nikon.
reply to this comment
H7 doesnt have manual focus feature, but it has Multi Point Auto Focus. Which one is better ? (sanzen — 06/14/2007)
I am bit confused between selecting Sony H5 which has Manual Focus and Sony H7 which has ONLY Auto Focus. Please help me out.
reply to this comment
Ben Keough (06/15/2007)
Hi Sandeep,
Manual focus on most non-SLR digitals (including the H5) is awkward and not particularly useful except for cases where you're shooting something that isn't moving and that you have plenty of time to set up for. Since these cameras don't have focus rings like SLRs, the manual focus is done through a series of button presses, which are unintuitive and slow. If you have the money to spend, I'd go for the H7 and not worry about the missing manual focus feature.
Good luck!
reply to this comment
Manual focus on most non-SLR digitals (including the H5) is awkward and not particularly useful except for cases where you're shooting something that isn't moving and that you have plenty of time to set up for. Since these cameras don't have focus rings like SLRs, the manual focus is done through a series of button presses, which are unintuitive and slow. If you have the money to spend, I'd go for the H7 and not worry about the missing manual focus feature.
Good luck!
Which camera takes great pics in an auditorium and gymnasium? (JT917 — 06/13/2007)
I will be taking lots(both my sons play basketball) of pics in the gym and at graduation in an auditorium..Please help me decide what camera to get!!
reply to this comment
Andrew Skinner (06/23/2007)
JT,
You're going to want a camera that does well in low light settings. Depending on your budgets, I have a couple of recommendations.
If your budget is a little lower, I would go with an extended zoom camera like the Sony H7 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). This camera has a 15x zoom with an ISO setting up to 3200 (great for low light situations). The image stabilization will also help keep sharper photos at the long zoom distances. An issue you might see is "grainiess" or camera noise in photos at ISO 3200. Although that speed will let more light in, you get more camera noise that way.
If you want to spend a bit more for better quality, I would recommend a dSLR ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) camera like the Canon XTi ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) combined with a lens that has a low aperture setting (f/stop number), and a decent amount of zoom (at least 100-200mm) like the Canon 70-200mm f/2.8 ( amazon.com/Canon-70-200mm-2... ) lens.
Andrew
reply to this comment
You're going to want a camera that does well in low light settings. Depending on your budgets, I have a couple of recommendations.
If your budget is a little lower, I would go with an extended zoom camera like the Sony H7 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). This camera has a 15x zoom with an ISO setting up to 3200 (great for low light situations). The image stabilization will also help keep sharper photos at the long zoom distances. An issue you might see is "grainiess" or camera noise in photos at ISO 3200. Although that speed will let more light in, you get more camera noise that way.
If you want to spend a bit more for better quality, I would recommend a dSLR ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) camera like the Canon XTi ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) combined with a lens that has a low aperture setting (f/stop number), and a decent amount of zoom (at least 100-200mm) like the Canon 70-200mm f/2.8 ( amazon.com/Canon-70-200mm-2... ) lens.
Andrew
JT917 (06/24/2007)
Thanks a bunch!!
reply to this comment
Andrew Skinner (06/24/2007)
reply to this comment
Kent Smith (11/05/2007)
Same concern -- I take a lot of pics inside gyms, auditoriums and other low light/far subject situations. My current digital camera, Olympus Stylus 410 doesn't do well at all in this settting. From what I've read, the main feature I should be looking at is ISO speed -- is that correct? I like the convienence of the auto-modes (don't really consider myself a photographer) and like the subcompacts. Is there any model you would recommend for this type of situation? If there's nothing in the compacts, what point and shoot models might you recomment
reply to this comment
tanjit (12/07/2007)
buy a DSLR camera buddy .................
reply to this comment
Patty K (01/18/2008)
I have a Sony H7 and bought it with taking sports pictures in mind. My quality is terrible. Everything is blurry, even when they are standing still. I've tried about every setting combination there is and I'm really dissapointed. I've tried high ISO, fast shutter speed, you name it. Another other ideas?
reply to this comment
Batteries?what are the pro's and con's of this battery instead of using the AA's like the H1-5? (eck — 06/13/2007)
I'm looking at getting an H7 but I'm uncertain because of this battery, not sure if it's practical...
reply to this comment
Brenda Paro (06/14/2007)
Yeah, I'm a fan of AAs myself, because the rechargeable ones are cheap and much easier to replace. With a lithium-ion, you must buy that particular battery, along with the charger. They're more expensive to replace as well. You may get a longer life out of it, however, than you would with AAs. So, basically, they're not quite as practical as AAs, but if it's the camera you want, the battery won't be a terrible thing to have to deal with and should be OK to use.
reply to this comment
eck (06/14/2007)
is there a charger for the lithium-ion batteries that charges them using AA's? that would be first prize I think...
reply to this comment
Bruce Hilgane (06/22/2007)
The H7 comes with a rechargable battery and its charger. I find it more practical to buy a spare battery, tote this mini-charger around (which fits nicely in your pocket). I'm not much for bulky AA chargers and/or buying a bunch of batteries. If you have an adapter for your car (and who doesn't nowadays?) that allows a normal plug to insert, you're fine with an always charged battery. What I'm talking about is the adapter that goes into either your cig-lighter or power supply (a lot of SUV's/Vans come with extra power outlets) and the other end accepts normal plugs.
So, in conclusion, just pick up an extra battery when you buy the camera and the car adapter...for the car should be about 15 bucks, the battery I think is 40.
reply to this comment
So, in conclusion, just pick up an extra battery when you buy the camera and the car adapter...for the car should be about 15 bucks, the battery I think is 40.
abhi (06/22/2007)
While zooming the object is takes more battery (AA) than currently H7 having.
I am not professional but its my practical exp.
reply to this comment
I am not professional but its my practical exp.
how do I get 8M to work? (rwright — 06/09/2007)
my new h7 is only recording images to a maximum of 2M, altho set to 8M - even when I do not use a zoom. Is this correct? How can I get the full 8M image?
reply to this comment
Johnnie (06/12/2007)
Are you perhaps confusing megabytes and megapixels?
John
reply to this comment
John
Hi, I have a confusion which one to choose between Sony DSC-T100, Sony DSC-H7 and Canon SD 800/850. Can anybody help me out ? (FriendNishant — 06/08/2007)
Hi, I have a confusion which one to choose between Sony DSC-T100, Sony DSC-H7 and Canon SD 800/850. Can anybody help me out ?
Picture Quality is the top-priority. Price is not an issue.
If you feel that any other model is superior to the above ones then plz suggest.
Waiting desperately for responce.
Thank You!!
reply to this comment
Picture Quality is the top-priority. Price is not an issue.
If you feel that any other model is superior to the above ones then plz suggest.
Waiting desperately for responce.
Thank You!!
by James DeRuvo (06/08/2007)
Usually, when we get a "which one to choose" question, I recommend people stop by this site ( imaging-resource.com/IMCOMP... ), which compares two cameras by looking at similar photos show with each camera.
From what I can see, Canon has the slight edge on outdoor photos, but for portraits, color, and up close/macro shots, the Sony T100 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) starts to pull away.
Having said that, I don't like SONY. It relies on proprietary technologies like memory sticks which can't be used in anything other than SONY products. In addition, you are paying for the SONY name.
But there's no mistaking my eyes and I see a definitely difference for the better with the T100. I couldn't test the H7 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), however, but it does get pretty good reviews and rates a B+. The Canon, on the other hand, rates an A- and has image stabilization.
In the end, you may just need to go to a camera store and hold them all to determine which one works for you.
reply to this comment
From what I can see, Canon has the slight edge on outdoor photos, but for portraits, color, and up close/macro shots, the Sony T100 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) starts to pull away.
Having said that, I don't like SONY. It relies on proprietary technologies like memory sticks which can't be used in anything other than SONY products. In addition, you are paying for the SONY name.
But there's no mistaking my eyes and I see a definitely difference for the better with the T100. I couldn't test the H7 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), however, but it does get pretty good reviews and rates a B+. The Canon, on the other hand, rates an A- and has image stabilization.
In the end, you may just need to go to a camera store and hold them all to determine which one works for you.
Can RAW pics be emailed just like Jpeg files? (ellison52 — 06/08/2007)
My Sony DSC F707 has bitten the dust. I was looking at this camera as a replacement. I am an avid photographer but not very sophisticated. I basically point and shoot, zoom a lot, I take a lot of pics of architecture (close ups of sections I find interesting) am currently in Japan and want to record everything. I find I can't adjust pics very well in jpeg and am curious about the RAW technology. Would I have to run all the pics through an Adobe printshop type program before I had a usable pic to email home?
reply to this comment
Ben Keough (06/08/2007)
Hi Robin,
You can email pretty much any kind of file, but you'll probably have a couple problems with RAW files.
1. They're very large, in terms of file size. Like at least 3-4x as large as a .jpg of the same image. They'll take longer to upload and download.
2. Each camera manufacturer uses a slightly different RAW format. This means, usually, that you have to use that manufacturer's software to view the images. Photoshop can handle most RAW formats, but 99% of PC/Mac users don't have Photoshop.
For these reasons, if you got this camera you'd probably be better off shooting in JPEG mode unless you're shooting explicitly to print at very large print sizes.
Hope this helps!
reply to this comment
You can email pretty much any kind of file, but you'll probably have a couple problems with RAW files.
1. They're very large, in terms of file size. Like at least 3-4x as large as a .jpg of the same image. They'll take longer to upload and download.
2. Each camera manufacturer uses a slightly different RAW format. This means, usually, that you have to use that manufacturer's software to view the images. Photoshop can handle most RAW formats, but 99% of PC/Mac users don't have Photoshop.
For these reasons, if you got this camera you'd probably be better off shooting in JPEG mode unless you're shooting explicitly to print at very large print sizes.
Hope this helps!
Ben Keough (06/08/2007)
p.s., what sort of adjustments do you want to make? there are many free image manipulation programs available, the best of which (in terms of free software) is probably GIMP (an open-source photoshop equivalent).
reply to this comment
maxLover (07/17/2007)
can H-7 support RAW format, ? every camera supports raw but some of them store in JPEG (i hope i am right:( )
so is it possible to import RAW images in photoshop from Sony H7
reply to this comment
so is it possible to import RAW images in photoshop from Sony H7
Ben Keough (07/19/2007)
Hi Zafar,
What you mean to say, I think, is that every camera shoots RAW images, but most process them down to JPEG compression for storage. The H7, unfortunately, does not allow you to save images in RAW format.
reply to this comment
What you mean to say, I think, is that every camera shoots RAW images, but most process them down to JPEG compression for storage. The H7, unfortunately, does not allow you to save images in RAW format.
maxLover (07/20/2007)
Thanks for replying. I wanted to edit/enhance from RAW format, but i guess SLR supports this..
thanks for your reply :)
reply to this comment
thanks for your reply :)
Unable to zoom.. (abhi — 05/27/2007)
I am first timer in digital camara owner (H7), priviously i was able to do 76x digital zoom, but now i am unable to do zoom beyond 15x , wht setting i hav to do?
reply to this comment
Ben Keough (05/29/2007)
Hi Anish,
It sounds like you have digital zoom disabled somewhere in the camera's menu system. In the "Settings" menu under "Shooting Settings" there should be a setting for digital zoom. Make sure it's turned on, then try again.
Good luck!
reply to this comment
It sounds like you have digital zoom disabled somewhere in the camera's menu system. In the "Settings" menu under "Shooting Settings" there should be a setting for digital zoom. Make sure it's turned on, then try again.
Good luck!
abhi (05/30/2007)
U r right but with small change go to menu option n do the setting for this issue.
Actualy i change 2,3 changes n setting after that it slov the problem. By the way Thaxs for ur kind reply.
Can u tell me where can i get details nfo abt basics of photography, like wht apparture , iso etc. means n how it attect the pic in reality.
Pls help..
Anish.
reply to this comment
Actualy i change 2,3 changes n setting after that it slov the problem. By the way Thaxs for ur kind reply.
Can u tell me where can i get details nfo abt basics of photography, like wht apparture , iso etc. means n how it attect the pic in reality.
Pls help..
Anish.
Ben Keough (05/31/2007)
Anish,
The best place to start reading up on those subjects is probably wikipedia. It'll have lots of basic info as well as links to more in-depth discussions of each subject. Here are a few pages:
Aperture ( en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aperture )
ISO ( en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_5... )
Overall Photography ( en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photo... )
Good luck!
reply to this comment
The best place to start reading up on those subjects is probably wikipedia. It'll have lots of basic info as well as links to more in-depth discussions of each subject. Here are a few pages:
Aperture ( en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aperture )
ISO ( en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_5... )
Overall Photography ( en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photo... )
Good luck!
Tony (06/03/2007)
RTM. It's on page 79. Shooting settings/ Digital zoom / *smart* zoom
You cannot use the 8MP setting or the 3:2 mode with this option (since a 76x magnification results in a VGA ("webcam") image). The *precision* zoom (30x digital) is available in 8MP mode, I recommend that you should stick with that.
reply to this comment
You cannot use the 8MP setting or the 3:2 mode with this option (since a 76x magnification results in a VGA ("webcam") image). The *precision* zoom (30x digital) is available in 8MP mode, I recommend that you should stick with that.
Edward Hardy (06/05/2007)
I would like to buy the Sony 8.1 MP Cyber-Shot DSC-H7 but I would like to know if it has date/time stamp feature.
reply to this comment
Ben Keough (06/06/2007)
Hi Edward,
No, the H7 doesn't have a direct date/time stamp feature. You'll have to either use a an external computer program that does it when you import them, or do it manually via photoshop or something.
Sorry!
reply to this comment
No, the H7 doesn't have a direct date/time stamp feature. You'll have to either use a an external computer program that does it when you import them, or do it manually via photoshop or something.
Sorry!
Johnnie (07/11/2007)
Actually, when you store your pictures on your computer, there is an invisible date stamp on it. To find it, go to any picture file and hold the cursor on a picture. Hold it there for a moment and a small window will appear. It will tell you:
1. the type of file (jpg etc)
2. the rating
3. the dimensions
4. the size of the file.
Also if you hold your cursor on a picture and right-click it and then go to "properties" you will find more information. It will even tell you what camera took the picture.
reply to this comment
1. the type of file (jpg etc)
2. the rating
3. the dimensions
4. the size of the file.
Also if you hold your cursor on a picture and right-click it and then go to "properties" you will find more information. It will even tell you what camera took the picture.
Ben Keough (07/11/2007)
Hi John,
Yes, each image has EXIF data included in its JPEG encoding, but what Edward was asking about (I think, given the number of similar questions I've fielded) was if the H7 allows you to actually stamp the time/date ON the image itself, in-camera. Consumer digitals used to do this ages ago, but most have moved away from the practice these days.
Sorry I wasn't more clear in my response.
reply to this comment
Yes, each image has EXIF data included in its JPEG encoding, but what Edward was asking about (I think, given the number of similar questions I've fielded) was if the H7 allows you to actually stamp the time/date ON the image itself, in-camera. Consumer digitals used to do this ages ago, but most have moved away from the practice these days.
Sorry I wasn't more clear in my response.
inspire (07/31/2007)
Hi Tony,
Tnx for your advise, but it does not work. I have a problem with zoom too. On the screen it is written that max zoom is 2,8 (I think I've already tried all kind of settings). How to make it at least 15??? please help!!!
reply to this comment
Tnx for your advise, but it does not work. I have a problem with zoom too. On the screen it is written that max zoom is 2,8 (I think I've already tried all kind of settings). How to make it at least 15??? please help!!!
Is there a disadvantage to having an H7 that does not offer RAW format options if you want to do semi-serious photo editing? (gwithers13 — 05/21/2007)
reply to this comment
Brenda Paro (05/21/2007)
Depends really on what you mean by semi-serious. Some photographers swear by RAW, as its lack of compression (as opposed to jpg, etc.) allows a lot more freedom of editing and results in better final pictures. If you've never used RAW and never missed it, you will probably be just fine with a camera that doesn't have it. Just my opinion, though. As I said, it depends on the type and amount of editing work you're planning on, but if you've been OK without it up to this point it is probably fine not to have it on the camera you purchase.
reply to this comment
Tony (06/03/2007)
Having read Brenda P's general answer, which I agree with, I must add that with THIS camera, you are likely to miss RAW/TIFF, since the level of JPEG compression is said to be too high (washing out mid-tones) and unadjustable.
reply to this comment
HOW I CAN ADJUST THE PICTURE DEEP IN AP PRIRORITY MODE? (alireza48 — 05/17/2007)
I set the mode to A and turn on macro but by AF on i couldn't focus on the object and have blur in background. it seems camera works vice versa the background of picture is clear and the main onject is blur. i tried several times by changing the focus mode.
reply to this comment
bukit97 (05/18/2007)
This is where manual focus gives you more control over auto focus.
However, all is not lost. You can still do it correctly with a little bit of patience.
Set the lens to wide angle and point the focusing bracket at the object. Hold still and wait for the object to be in focus. Then snap it away.
Since the depth of focus will be shallow, you probably has to use a tripod to keep the camera steady and the aperture has to be set to the smallest.
reply to this comment
However, all is not lost. You can still do it correctly with a little bit of patience.
Set the lens to wide angle and point the focusing bracket at the object. Hold still and wait for the object to be in focus. Then snap it away.
Since the depth of focus will be shallow, you probably has to use a tripod to keep the camera steady and the aperture has to be set to the smallest.
How can I get the photo number indicators to return to ZERO? (kayowe1212 — 05/15/2007)
I've tried re-formatting the Memory Card, both in and out of the camera. I'd like to have a Zero starting number for vacations, etc. Thanks.
reply to this comment
bukit97 (05/15/2007)
Do not format your memory card to reset the picture number. Try using the ' Setup ' function instead.
Go to 'Setup' and select 'Setup 2'.
Set 'File number' to 'Reset'.
This will reset the file number to 0001.
You may find it useful to browse through the FAQs of Sony H7 at <a href="sonydigital-link.com/DIME/F... site</a> for an instant answer to most of the frequently asked questions.
reply to this comment
Go to 'Setup' and select 'Setup 2'.
Set 'File number' to 'Reset'.
This will reset the file number to 0001.
You may find it useful to browse through the FAQs of Sony H7 at <a href="sonydigital-link.com/DIME/F... site</a> for an instant answer to most of the frequently asked questions.
kayowe1212 (05/15/2007)
I have gone through everything imaginable step-by-step. This setting does not appear on my camera. I appreciate your help (bukit97); I must be doing something wrong. My old(er) camera, the H1, had this "series" and "file number reset" setting, but I cannot find it on my H7. (There are only 3 settings in "setup2" for me. They are: [1] USB connect, [2] Component, and [3] Video out.) I have accessed the HELP site that you linked. It gives me the same information, but I cannot find it in my camera. Is there a way to help me step-by-step that I am missing?
reply to this comment
Johnnie (05/16/2007)
On my H-2 I find that the first item in 'Setup 2' is a choice between 'Series' and 'Reset'. Chose the latter to reset the numbers. Good luck.
reply to this comment
Johnnie (05/16/2007)
.....Have you installed a memory card that was formatted in the camera? I read somewhere that you should not format a memory card in your computer.
reply to this comment
kayowe1212 (05/16/2007)
Thanks John, but my H7 just doesn't have that setting. I'll keep experimenting w/ it, however. I'm sure it's just something I CANNOT find. I've only had the camera for a week, but it's a little thing that is frustrating me.
Again, thanks for your imput.
reply to this comment
Again, thanks for your imput.
bukit97 (05/17/2007)
OK, if you cannot get the reset done following the H2 way and the Sony FAQ's ( the link I gave you) answer is not helpful, Try the following :
Press the 'Home' button, use left arrow button, go to 'Memory card management'.
Use down arrow button, click until you reach 'Create Folder'.
Confirm that you want to create a new folder.
This should give you a new folder with picture number starting from the begining.
reply to this comment
Press the 'Home' button, use left arrow button, go to 'Memory card management'.
Use down arrow button, click until you reach 'Create Folder'.
Confirm that you want to create a new folder.
This should give you a new folder with picture number starting from the begining.
kayowe1212 (05/17/2007)
Hello bukit97,
That didn't work either....HOWEVER, here's what I did as a result of lots and lots of experimenting. After I saved what I wanted to a folder in my computer, I "dumped" everything in the trash and emptied it. Then I went back to the original settings using "initialize". It took a bit of time to make sure the time and date were accurate again (and English!), but it finally worked to reset the numbers to 1. Whew! I truly appreciate your help. I'm a novice at all of this; you seem to know what you're doing. I'm enjoying experimenting w/ the new camera. Next week = YOSEMITE! Thanks again.
reply to this comment
That didn't work either....HOWEVER, here's what I did as a result of lots and lots of experimenting. After I saved what I wanted to a folder in my computer, I "dumped" everything in the trash and emptied it. Then I went back to the original settings using "initialize". It took a bit of time to make sure the time and date were accurate again (and English!), but it finally worked to reset the numbers to 1. Whew! I truly appreciate your help. I'm a novice at all of this; you seem to know what you're doing. I'm enjoying experimenting w/ the new camera. Next week = YOSEMITE! Thanks again.
The specs of the H-7 indicate that it has a (jog) wheel dial. Where is it located. (Johnnie — 05/13/2007)
In the H-2 the jog wheel is located onder the shutter button. It is the least effective part of the camera. I have odered an H-7. I could not see a wheel dial in any photograph of the camera and hope it is more useful.
reply to this comment
Ben Keough (05/17/2007)
Hi John,
You can see the jog dial (unfortunately at a fairly bad angle) behind the shutter release button in this picture ( dpreview.com/news/0702/sony... ).
Hope this helps!
reply to this comment
You can see the jog dial (unfortunately at a fairly bad angle) behind the shutter release button in this picture ( dpreview.com/news/0702/sony... ).
Hope this helps!
Johnnie (05/17/2007)
You must have a photo of an English version of the H7.
See the photos on this link:
crutchfield.com/S-KnBAPqHkp... wheel is not there.
John
reply to this comment
See the photos on this link:
crutchfield.com/S-KnBAPqHkp... wheel is not there.
John
Ben Keough (05/18/2007)
John,
Unless we're talking about different things, the jog wheel is the wheel directly behind the shutter release in the pictures on the site you linked to. I've circled it here ( img246.imageshack.us/img246... ). It's also called the mode dial.
-Ben
reply to this comment
Unless we're talking about different things, the jog wheel is the wheel directly behind the shutter release in the pictures on the site you linked to. I've circled it here ( img246.imageshack.us/img246... ). It's also called the mode dial.
-Ben
Tony (06/03/2007)
It is around the 4-way control button, on the back panel.
reply to this comment
Johnnie (06/03/2007)
Thanks, Tony. I have purchased an H-7 and have discovered that what you say is true. The "wheel dial" works much better than the "jog wheel" in the H 2
John
reply to this comment
John
what to buy, H7 or the Olympus 550. must be easy to use and automatic as posssible. (tsherar — 05/09/2007)
I am not a camera person, i have a Nikon coolpix 3200, which is ok, but want a bridge between that and a dslr. I am not a techie so want it to be as automatic as poss, with little intervention from me.
The H7 and 550UZ seem to be the best/latest on the market, but might be too much technology for me. Any suggestions would be very helpful.
thanks
terry
reply to this comment
The H7 and 550UZ seem to be the best/latest on the market, but might be too much technology for me. Any suggestions would be very helpful.
thanks
terry
Matt (05/09/2007)
The SP550UZ is a very complicated camera that you probably want to stay away from if you're into the automatic and point-and-shoot ability. Also, this camera is a complete boundary-hopper for Olympus, with so much going on that a lot of it falls apart. The Sony DSC-H7 is also a hefty camera. Are you going for the zoom? Or the image quality?
These are no doubt some of the newest cameras out there. But what about the 12x zoom of the Canon S3IS? This is a VERY nice camera and, from experience, has plenty of manual controls but also is easy to use under default settings. Admittingly, though, these types of cameras should be purchased because they DO have manual.
The Canon Rebel XTI is also a nice camera that's easy-to-use. This is relatively speaking, since all these dSLR or near-dSLR cameras take some getting used to when compared with the compacts and point-and-shoots.
Decide very carefully if these size/complex cameras are what you really want, and purchase accordingly. Between these 2 models, I'd choose the Sony H7. If you're open to more ideas, I'd say the S3IS.
reply to this comment
These are no doubt some of the newest cameras out there. But what about the 12x zoom of the Canon S3IS? This is a VERY nice camera and, from experience, has plenty of manual controls but also is easy to use under default settings. Admittingly, though, these types of cameras should be purchased because they DO have manual.
The Canon Rebel XTI is also a nice camera that's easy-to-use. This is relatively speaking, since all these dSLR or near-dSLR cameras take some getting used to when compared with the compacts and point-and-shoots.
Decide very carefully if these size/complex cameras are what you really want, and purchase accordingly. Between these 2 models, I'd choose the Sony H7. If you're open to more ideas, I'd say the S3IS.
tsherar (05/09/2007)
Hi Matt,
Thanks for the very sound advice.
I have looked at the canon S3IS, and also the Fujifilm 9600, the reason I have selected the Sony and the Olympus, is that they these are the latest.
I to agree with you re the olympus, reading between the lines it is a complex camera.
I do not know whether i will get ''hooked on photography'', but what I want is a fixed lens camera with a good zoom/wideangle lens that is easy to operate, but can be used manually if I get into it, but not a problem or a waste of features if i just use it as an automatic camera.
Cheers
terry
reply to this comment
Thanks for the very sound advice.
I have looked at the canon S3IS, and also the Fujifilm 9600, the reason I have selected the Sony and the Olympus, is that they these are the latest.
I to agree with you re the olympus, reading between the lines it is a complex camera.
I do not know whether i will get ''hooked on photography'', but what I want is a fixed lens camera with a good zoom/wideangle lens that is easy to operate, but can be used manually if I get into it, but not a problem or a waste of features if i just use it as an automatic camera.
Cheers
terry
Matt (05/09/2007)
If you want a nice camera that can double as a dSLR when you get better at photography, is the Canon Rebel XTI/EOS. What a wonderful camera. About as professional as you can get for the money (~$500). You can even add lenses if you'd like as well, and Canon arguably makes the best lenses.
reply to this comment
robin (05/18/2007)
Hello! I am interested in purchasing a digital camera that produces web and mail order catalogue worthy pictures of jewelry. Sony H7 or Olympus 550? Your input is appreciated because I am starting a business that showcases original design jewelry.
reply to this comment
Matt (05/18/2007)
Well, in web and mail-order catalogue pictures, the pictures are very small (compared to 4x6", of course). You really don't need the newest cameras with high megapixels to handle what you're going for.
Do you plan on taking pictures of this jewelry from across the room? :-P If not, you don't need the zoom. I'm guessing you're just looking for a camera that can handle pictures from a few inches to a few feet away, max. Any camera can do this, and when you shrink down to the 2x2" pictures or smaller that are on websites or catalogues, you'll be fine.
Canon cameras give very nice color defiition. As long as you have enough light in your picture (and what jewelry photographer doesn't?!), you won't need flash, you won't need high megapixels, and you won't need a huge professional camera.
THAT BEING SAID, based on your two options, I'd choose the Olympus.
dpreview.com/reviews/olympu... super-macro mode takes very crisp pictures. Read the professional review if you're interested.
reply to this comment
Do you plan on taking pictures of this jewelry from across the room? :-P If not, you don't need the zoom. I'm guessing you're just looking for a camera that can handle pictures from a few inches to a few feet away, max. Any camera can do this, and when you shrink down to the 2x2" pictures or smaller that are on websites or catalogues, you'll be fine.
Canon cameras give very nice color defiition. As long as you have enough light in your picture (and what jewelry photographer doesn't?!), you won't need flash, you won't need high megapixels, and you won't need a huge professional camera.
THAT BEING SAID, based on your two options, I'd choose the Olympus.
dpreview.com/reviews/olympu... super-macro mode takes very crisp pictures. Read the professional review if you're interested.
tsherar (05/18/2007)
Hi everyone,
MAny thanks for the input. I have almost, LOL, decided on the sony H7 or H9, over the S3IS, purely on the basis that it is a newer machine and had good reviews.
I will probably plump for thr H7, as I cannot see the advantage of the little the H9 has over the H7, night shooting might be good to have, but I would rarely use it. Saying that we do have barn owls, and some night pix would be nice, but I can get enough shots of them during the day.
The range of the lens, also played a part. I also considered the SONY DSLR-A100 with 2 lens, but I think that it would be a bitof an overkill, and I do not fancy messing around changing lenses., but maybe the resale value of the A100, might be better than the H7.
Thanks again
terry
reply to this comment
MAny thanks for the input. I have almost, LOL, decided on the sony H7 or H9, over the S3IS, purely on the basis that it is a newer machine and had good reviews.
I will probably plump for thr H7, as I cannot see the advantage of the little the H9 has over the H7, night shooting might be good to have, but I would rarely use it. Saying that we do have barn owls, and some night pix would be nice, but I can get enough shots of them during the day.
The range of the lens, also played a part. I also considered the SONY DSLR-A100 with 2 lens, but I think that it would be a bitof an overkill, and I do not fancy messing around changing lenses., but maybe the resale value of the A100, might be better than the H7.
Thanks again
terry
robin (05/18/2007)
Thank-you for your answer, Matt. You are correct, in that I will not be photographing the jewelry from across the room. I am hoping that with the appropriate macro mode and indirect lighting (photo dome), I will have jewelry photos that do not "glitter" back as a result of the combination of light and metal in the photo.
reply to this comment
D C (05/31/2007)
What is the big difference between the Sony DSC H9 and the Sony DSC H6?
reply to this comment
tsherar (06/01/2007)
Hi,
If you go to:
dpreview.com/reviews/sideby... can compare many cameras side by side.
I cannot see an H6 there though.
Hope this helps.
Terry
reply to this comment
If you go to:
dpreview.com/reviews/sideby... can compare many cameras side by side.
I cannot see an H6 there though.
Hope this helps.
Terry
Matt (06/01/2007)
Yeah, dpreview.com doesn't have the H6 reviewed. I'm guessing because it doesn't exist, hehe.
How about the H7?
Not on dpreview either, and only 2 on amazon: amazon.com/Sony-Cybershot-D... can also check out the reviews on amazon for the DSC-H9... not so good... lol.
reply to this comment
How about the H7?
Not on dpreview either, and only 2 on amazon: amazon.com/Sony-Cybershot-D... can also check out the reviews on amazon for the DSC-H9... not so good... lol.
tsherar (06/02/2007)
Hi,
If you go to buying/side by side at dpreview, you csan select the H9 and the H7.
I read the 2 reviews on amazon, both seem to be reasonable. I have just received my H7, so will report back on it.
terry
reply to this comment
If you go to buying/side by side at dpreview, you csan select the H9 and the H7.
I read the 2 reviews on amazon, both seem to be reasonable. I have just received my H7, so will report back on it.
terry
How long is the next-shot delay and the shutter lag on Sony Cybershot H7 (lovepurple — 04/28/2007)
I am needing a camera that has very minimal next-shot delay and shutter lag. I take pictures of my children at swim meets and need to be able to get pictures of them diving off the block. I experimented with the Sony Cybershot H2 and liked the speed of the next-shot delay. Is the Sony Cybershot H7 as fast of faster?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (05/01/2007)
Unable to find any specific times, but user reviews from various sites list it as being very acceptable/competitive with others. Sony claims they have creating a technology which anticipates and reduces the shutter lag. I'll believe it when I see it.
reply to this comment
Matt (05/10/2007)
2.2 FPS, so just under .5 second in continuous shooting mode. Cameras of this type have near instantaneous snap-shot ability. This is faster than the H2. Even has 1/4000 max shutter speed.
reply to this comment
Manual focus? (northwoods — 04/26/2007)
In reading the definitions for both the H7 and the H9 I don't believe it mentions that either one of these cameras have manual focus ability. Does anyone know for sure if either of these cameras come with that ablility?
reply to this comment
China Mark (04/26/2007)
Hi Pam,
<A HREF="dpreview.com/reviews/compar... a side-by-side comparison of the cameras and they both have manual focus according to the specifications.
Mark
reply to this comment
<A HREF="dpreview.com/reviews/compar... a side-by-side comparison of the cameras and they both have manual focus according to the specifications.
Mark
alireza48 (05/17/2007)
HI PAN,
You can focus manually for modes "M", "A", "S". in these modes look at LCD options @ bottom rigth by changing the symbol to hand figure by turning the wheel on camera back.
when the option is in yellow color push the mid key and set that by distances option in that.
reply to this comment
You can focus manually for modes "M", "A", "S". in these modes look at LCD options @ bottom rigth by changing the symbol to hand figure by turning the wheel on camera back.
when the option is in yellow color push the mid key and set that by distances option in that.
Does the H7 take night shots (in the dark) (northwoods — 04/26/2007)
In comparing the H7 with the H9, I was wondering if the H7 takes night shots like the H9 claims it does.
reply to this comment
China Mark (04/26/2007)
Hi Pam,
According to <A HREF="dcresource.com/news/newsite... article</A> "The H9 camera is the only Cyber-shot model in this year's line to feature NightShot technology."
It appears to be that and the difference in LCD size that sets the H7 and H9 apart.
Mark
reply to this comment
According to <A HREF="dcresource.com/news/newsite... article</A> "The H9 camera is the only Cyber-shot model in this year's line to feature NightShot technology."
It appears to be that and the difference in LCD size that sets the H7 and H9 apart.
Mark
Tony (06/03/2007)
H7 does not have Sony's NightShot feature (infrared LEDs - and I guess it also involves disabling the IR filters of the CCD). If you are really into taking those nightvision images, go for the H9.
reply to this comment
clark (06/15/2007)
Wonder which is best to buy, the H2 or the H9?
reply to this comment
Does the Sony H7 take burst pictures? How many per second? (SurfingPix — 04/20/2007)
reply to this comment
bukit97 (04/20/2007)
Yes, Sony H7 takes burst pictures at 2.2fps up to 100 shots.
Compared to 3/2 fps (max 7 images) of Panasonic FZ8 and 1.7 fps(max 3 images) of Kodak Z710, Sony H7 probably has one of the highest buffers among the superzoom cameras.
reply to this comment
Compared to 3/2 fps (max 7 images) of Panasonic FZ8 and 1.7 fps(max 3 images) of Kodak Z710, Sony H7 probably has one of the highest buffers among the superzoom cameras.
Does this have face detection technolgy? (snlcollins — 03/04/2007)
camera focuses on the face in a picture
reply to this comment
Brenda Paro (03/04/2007)
reply to this comment
snlcollins (03/04/2007)
Thanks for the info!
reply to this comment
Tony (06/03/2007)
FD is only available in portrait mode on the H7/H9. Compare it to Fuji's FD, for instance: that works in real time during composing the picture, and you are not limited to one particular scene mode (portrait) there. But you may not mind.
reply to this comment
Sony Cybershot H7 Reviews
Sony Cybershot H7 Reviews by Digital Camera-HQ Users
- 4.0 out of 5
Learner's Cam
(Jennifer — 07/24/2009)
It is a point-and-shoot. It has good preset settings which can filter light and make pro pictures.
It cannot deal with less-than-good light, and so inside/late afternoon/darker places and times make for bad/fuzzy/impossible shots.
"Action" setting is awesome, but again, it cannot handle inadequate lighting. However, for stage pictures/drama/etc with a spotlight on the actors, there never was a better setting!
- 5.0 out of 5
H7 video
(RITA BICK — 07/21/2009)
This is the perfect camera to use at a concert. Video cams and SLR's are not allowed. This camera has excellent video and the sound is perfect, even next to the giant speakers. It is the only digital camera that is not affected by the bass coming from the
speakers. Countless people have watched my videos on youtube and asked what camera I use.
- 4.0 out of 5
Excellent Learner's Camera
(Jennifer — 05/25/2009)
If you are learning and practicing photography, this is the best camera for you. It has pre-set settings that help you with exposure, shutter speed, etc.
It does not do as well inside, or in limited-light environments. Keep a quick finger and a keen eye! This is the camera for you!
- 4.0 out of 5
Amazing Performer
(Salehein — 01/02/2009)
Its a cool one to own. I am pretty much impressed with its performance. A simple automatic one with so many things to explore. Really a good choice.
- 5.0 out of 5
CERTIFICATE FOR SONY H7 CAMERA
(T.S.Krishna Moorthy — 12/22/2008)
In a simple word I will say that this camera is more than sufficient for taking family photograph at party and fuctions.
We like it and we are sure that all those having this camera
also will happy and satisfied of it.
- 5.0 out of 5
Best of it's kind
(Jen — 09/24/2008)
If you're looking for a good point-and-shoot camera with a couple rofessional-feeling dials and options, this is the place to stop.
- 4.0 out of 5
Good 4 family
(Gaby MARIAN — 07/08/2008)
I baught this camera hopping to get better pictures than usual cameras and i did. But i'm still not satisfied; an DSLR it's a better choice for those who wants to take hi-fi pictures. For those who wants 2 buy this camera there are some thing good to know :
+
this camera has remote control (very usefull); u can view your pictures or videos taken with DSC H7 on your LCD or Plasma TV in Full HD mode; the 15x zoom is very usefull in many ocasions; this camera has also included an parasolar for helping u to take good pictures even when the sun shines strongly.
-
the batterry life isn't very good - if u intent to take more pictures, u need to buy one more battery (that is not a R6 rechargable, like from older models)
- 5.0 out of 5
excellent camera umbeatble
(sourav — 03/18/2008)
I enjoy using this camara. It's as close to a SLR as you can get without the pricetag.this is best ....
- 5.0 out of 5
Awesome Camera
(Ritesh Sharma — 12/25/2007)
I researched a lot on cameras as I didn’t want to waste my hard earned money. First I read reviews of cannon and how it’s the best, but somehow I was not convinced by the overall performance reviews of cannon. At the end I decided to buy H7- and I couldn’t believe it. It’s just awesome. I have to say whatever sony makes, it the best and nobody can beat it. The focus of this camera is amazing and the best thing is image stabilizer. It has so many modes to shoot which makes it un beatable coz of its low price. I would recommend you to buy it if you want a camera with great power of zoom lens and high quality indoor and outdoor pictures.
- 4.0 out of 5
Great for the money
(Joel — 12/18/2007)
I enjoy using this camara. It's as close to a SLR as you can get without the pricetag. My only problem is 1. Sometimes indoors, it take too long to focus and the picture I saw on the LED screen is not what I got due to the split second delay. I found that I can overcome thi by using the viewfinder which is great because it's electronic therefore WYSIWYG. The other complaint i have is the dial switch on the back of the camara. If you hit the wrong part, which I always do, it switches to the auto timer or macro mode. Finally you need good 20/20 eyesite to read the info on the LED. Outside of those compaints I really love this camara. The zoom feature is outstanding!
- 4.0 out of 5
Good camera
(Andrew — 12/03/2007)
I am very happy with the camera.
in a earlyer review somebody said: "...Don't expect to get good indoor pictures..." I have had the same problem, but I switch the camera into "Auto Mode" and the photos came out pretty good. Great outside photo's.
8.1 MP is great.
15X gets you up and close, and with the 2X digital zoom(in the camera already) you can get 30X(if the "Conversion Lens" are set to "Off" or "Tele")! just go to: Home> Settings> Shoot Settings> Digital Zoom> Precision.
I don't like the Manual Focus, but it has a good is Auto Focus. I would buy a 1GB SD card for it, on the 8.1MP setting you'll get about 170 pics and 25 min worth of movies.
Overall: Great camera!
- 5.0 out of 5
Brilliant
(prasanga — 11/29/2007)
I recently from DSC-S40 and made a good decision to purchase the H7. The zooming is perfect and with the super steady shot feature it is wonderful.
- 4.0 out of 5
Camera Buff tells you the truth
(Prince — 10/21/2007)
Yes, The camera does take great photos; it is a bit technical like the Minolta Konica 7 HI, HOWEVER THE CANON HAS A DUMY INFO ON THE SCREEN WHERE A NEW CAMERA BUFF CAN ALLOW IT TO HELP THEM.
The sure shot for no blurs is good but still leaves a bit to be desired so a good rating is what it gets not an excellent.
Good features include the quick click shutter for sports action photos, a long battery life that is rechargeable, and extras for freedom of shooting styles.
The bad no card you must purchase this separately. This is like buying a car with no GAS!!
So I would give it four stars and believe me I own many different brands of digital cameras and can give a true opinion, I am a technology junkie this was my nineteenth digital camera purchase.
- 2.0 out of 5
disappointing
(sydney — 09/06/2007)
I was excited about this camera at first but when I when i got back my first set of pictures developed I was very disappointed. Pictures were grainy and blurry. Outside pictures are beautiful but thats pretty much it . Don't expect to get good indoor pictures. My sister's fuji takes much better pictures. I returned it after just 13 days.
- 5.0 out of 5
Sony delivers again
(Ritesh Varma — 08/11/2007)
I have always liked Sony over Canon, the natural colors and the ability to shoot in light conditions where Canon failed makes me trust this brand always.
Got one last month @$329 which was good, immediately check for a original piece and yes it was, got clicking and believe me, this one delivers even better shots than my older S90, the macros and image stabilization at full zoom are great, just think again before passing this one over.
- 5.0 out of 5
THE BEST.
(Ronaldo parker — 08/03/2007)
The best camera for it's price.
- 4.0 out of 5
Sony Cybershot H7 reviews
(guillermo refondos — 07/24/2007)
I agree with camera controls,it is fuzzy logic.
I have benn disapointed with the fringing and distortion of the Vario-Tessar,that is more than noticeable. But tests of others cameras of the same type are with similar complaints.For familiar or artistic photography it works very very well.Bad Photos when you get ISO 1000 or more,with a lot of electronic noise; but a bad photo is better than a NO PHOTO.Otherwise at ISO 80-400 images are as sharp as you may need.
- 5.0 out of 5
Sony's H7 camera
(Jim Peterson — 07/18/2007)
I recently upgraded from Sony's DSC717 because I wanted the additional telephoto capability as well as the greater megapixels. This camera takes excellent pictures. I use it mostly for outdoor and wildlife photography. It does take some practice and getting used to. I have used both the automatic functions as well as specialties settings. The more I use it the more I like it. The ability to hook it up directly to a large screen TV and show pictures is a very nice feature. Again, I like this camera!!
- 5.0 out of 5
All features you want in a digital camera
(ATUL MOONAT — 06/28/2007)
Fabulous extended zoom camera and takes great pictures and lots of options. However, The USB cable to connect to the computer is flimsy and difficult to push into and out of the camera. Also, marking on cable doesn't tell which side will go into the camera neither does the manual says anything. Apart from this it is amazing.
- 4.0 out of 5
Sony H7
(Dr. Ansari — 06/19/2007)
Good extended digital camera. good working focal lenght, fast, light, lens hood covers the view.......could have been better.........pricy though!
- 5.0 out of 5
Impossible to beat
(Simon — 06/16/2007)
If your your looking for a great camera that is capable of taking action pictures this is for you.
This camera doesnt take pictures, it makes pictures!!!!!!!1
- 3.0 out of 5
Disappointing
(Ray Wilson — 06/14/2007)
I am hugely disappointed in this camera. It has a great "paper" specification but in practice it just doesn't deliver. There are 2 main problems:-
1) Image quality - fine if you just want 6x4 prints but once you enlarge photos the quality disappears with purple fringing everywhere (a purple edge where dark areas meet lighter ares). The 8 megapixels just don't deliver - my former 2 megapixel camera takes just as good if not better photos.
2) The top control dial is very easily accidentally moved so you have to check every time you shoot. Very frustrating - could easily have been fixed with a security button to press before you can move the dial.
In addition, if you use macro you have to make sure you switch it off for the next photo. Again annoying.
Like other buyers, you can't get a 74mm filter for love or money.
On the plus side the zoom is excellent and build quality and general feel is good. However it just isn't enough. Wish I had bought a Fuji or Canon around the same price. Sony could do so much better than this!
- 4.0 out of 5
PERFECT OBTIONS
(alireza — 05/18/2007)
THE CAMER HAS MANY OPTIONS WHICH I CAN SELECT FOR TAKING PICTURES
- 5.0 out of 5
excellence
(Jack Mihuagh — 04/19/2007)
I rate this camera excellent on behalf of the great pictures it has taken.
