Hey! You should know that this product has been discontinued. Here are our current recommended cameras in the Extended Zoom Digital Cameras category.
Sony Cybershot H9
Editor's Review
The Sony Cybershot H9 is a solid follow-up to the immensely popular H5 extended zoom camera. Joining the Olympus SP-550UZ, the H9 pushes beyond the 12x threshold with an amazing 15x optical zoom. Super Steady Shot image stabilization makes sure that your photos won't be blurry or otherwise affected when you take long-distance shots, and the camera even features "Night Shot" mode, for taking photos in complete darkness. The H9 is an appealing camera with a sterling pedigree, and we're very excited to see a new edition to Sony's superlative extended zoom line. Consumers may now want to consider Sony's H50, with a 15x zoom and 9 megapixels.
Specifications
- 8.1 megapixels
- 15x optical zoom / 30x digital zoom
- Auto focus
- Auto and manual exposure
- ISO 80-3200
- Movie mode with sound
- Super Steady Shot Image Stabilization
- HDTV output
- 3.0-inch LCD
- Memory Stick storage (31MB internal)
- Lithium-ion battery
- Part Number: DSCH9/B
- UPC: 027242707207
- Release Date: Feb 28, 2007
Shop for H9 Accessories
Sony Cybershot H9 Comments & Questions (write your own!)
i have just import Sony DSC h50 from JAPAN, the problem i am facing is that its manual is in "Japanese Language", which creates many problems for me
does any one have its manual in English Language? or from where i can got it in pdf or in down loadable form
Kindly help me in this regard
Many thanks
Have asked this question of many forums and get answers which are useful,educating me about DPI,Megapixel V megabites,etc,but still do not know if my camera can do the 300 !
Thanks !
Part of the confusion may be that DPI is a measurement of printer or computer monitor resolution, and isn't supposed to be really applied to digital cameras. But I know that what you're asking is, can a photo taken with this camera print at 300 DPI? The answer is that yes, it could, but you would need a printer that was capable of doing so. Even the lowest quality setting on your camera will probably print just fine at 300 DPI, so you should be just fine. The issue is making sure that your printer can handle it; and most printers are totally fine with this, it's a fairly low resolution.
The H-9 shoots stills at:
3264 x 2448
2592 x 1944
2048 x 1536
640 x 480
3264 x 2176 (3:2)
1920 x 1080 (16:9)
If you want to be ultra-safe, you can set it to the highest 3264 x 2448 resolution.
Hope that helps!
Can anyone please help me how to get the date on the image from Sony H9 without going through another software to edit the image with date. I have Nikon 4800 and prints the date on the image and gets printed always, that's wht I want from H9.
Thanks.
download3k.com/Photo-Graphi... will add it on for you, and then you can print your photos.
Thanks.
Sony on the other hand has opted for only using Exif data to store the date of the picture.
As such, you will not be able to see the date on the picture.
However, if you want to check the date of the picture on the computer, you can always ' right click' on the picture, and select ' properties '. This will reveal all the Exif data, including the date, and time, picture was taken.
To get the date printed on the pictures without going through a software, you can connect the camera to a ' Pictbridge Compliant' printer.
The printer will let you opt for dates to be printed together with the picture.
try:
download.com/BatchStamper/3...
For unlimited printing per session, pictbridge compliant printer is still the best, because it's already paid for as part of the price of the printer.
Any solution easily implementable is welcome.
Thanks.
As these probably would be what the average users would do, besides using Pictbridge compliant printers, there are not much to add.
As a top user, I have decided to mark Aditya's answer on Jun 11 as the best answer because he was the first person to provide the solution.
I'm not much of a fan of Sony because you 1) pay a premium for that Sony nameplate 2) they're obsessed with painting their customers into proprietary technological corners. And all that for cameras that are nominal in performance.
But given the choice between the two mentioned ... I'd take the Finepix S8100.
Can you please advice me that H10 is in same series and better than H9.
So, quality wise I think they'll be largely similar in sharpness and color. This choice may down to which features you like best. And we can't advise you there. It's a matter of personal preference.
The SP560UZ does use AAs, but the battery life isn't bad at all.
Im told by the astronomical telescope dealer that the Canon S5 will fit the scope with an adaptor he stocks. Does anyone know if the same would apply for a Sony H9 and which camera would best for long range whale watching shots and the odd night sky shot?
You should be able to get telescope adapters for both of these cameras using a series of step down rings. You're going to have a longer zoom capability with the Sony H9 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), so that might be better for your whale watching. I would get some sort of water proof bag to go over the camera. You don't want moisture getting inside of it. If you want the night sky shot, I would put the camera on a tripod or steady surface and use the timer to avoid any camera shake. Good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
And I wouldn't be so hung up on which one has the better zoom range. You'll have plenty of range thanks to that telescope. What I'd be focusing on is which one does the better job at a focal coupling through the scope. Both should work nominally.
What I can recommend, however, is that for comparison, you may want to check out this resource ( imaging-resource.com/IMCOMP... ). It takes pictures with each and you can compare them side by side.
BTW - If you're happy with the answer you received, you can simply click on "Mark for best answer" bubble and it will place the question in the "Answered" category for all to see. Or, you can leave the question open for a little while longer and see what else gets posted.
The largest differences between this camera is the fact that it has a 0.5 inch larger LCD screen and can take interchangeable lenses. With only about a $50 difference, I would see this as an opportunity to go with the H9 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) in case you want to expand what you can do with your camera. This camera will support more of what you want to do. Good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
salesman told me the lens was not really Zeiss and I should go with the Panasonic Luminx Z8 instead. now I'm even more confused. He said the Luminx had a better Leica lens.
The H7 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is not much different than the H9 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )(nothing that I can see that warrants a $100 price difference, though its a $50 difference here on DCHQ), and it actually gets better ratings. The H9 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) does allow for external lens hookups though, which can be nice when trying to do more with your camera.
Both Panasonic and Sony make good cameras. I'd be weary when a salesman tries to steer you in a direction you weren't originally interested in. Many times they are just trying to sell something they're overstocked in. What was the price difference of the camera? The Panasonic FZ8 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) does not have as much zoom or resolution as the other two cameras, though it may perform better in low light situations. If you like the price, it could be a viable option.
Andrew
The biggest difference between the 2 is that the H9 has a night shot mode. It is pretty signifcant but the photos it takes in this mode look like you took them with night vision goggles on!
If you can live with the lower res screen the H7 is a better buy.
- page 75 of the H9 Cybershot Handbook
BTW - If you're happy with the answer you received, you can simply click on "Mark for best answer" bubble and it will place the question in the "Answered" category for all to see. Thanks for posting it and Good luck!
Affixing filters to the lens means there's no turning back as it's affecting the image directly.
2. In the case of H9, filter cannot be ' affixed to the lens ' . It has to be screwed on to a filter adapter or filter tube which in turn slips over the lens and attached to the camera body. It can be easily removed if needed.
3. Filters do have a place in digital photography. Besides ' circular polarizing filter ', ' 8 point star filter ' , ' macro and closeup filter ' and ' density filter ' are rather useful while ' infra red ' filter is in-dispensable for infra red photography.
If Sally is still interested, probably purchasing an H9 <a href="search.ebay.com/?fsop=32&am... adapter</a> will solve the problem.
The Sony H9 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) looks to be the way to go. While both cameras seem to have the same features, the H9 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) has more optical zoom at 15x. The ISO 3200 will perform much better in low light settings (although add some graininess to the photos), and the camera has a highly touted "Night Shot" mode which is supposed to take photos in almost complete darkness. I hope this helps. Good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
I just purchased a Canon S5 of my own and I chose this camera due to the features which appeal to me. I've read a many reviews on this camera, and although there are still many aspect I would have like to have which were not there, I decided that it's a price compromise maybe on the manufacturer's part.
For the S5, some of the better features include: -
1. movie function - although H9 can give the same resolution, due to S5 USM lens, I'll be able to get silent and smooth zooming in movie mode, also there is stereo sound recording available.
2. Feature-wise, S5 offers more! All the functions available on a SLR camera can be found on the S5, and all the buttons are well arrange and user-friendly. The functions are extensive and it's fully manual. There's a flash hot-shoe for whenever the need for a flash upgrade arises and then there is the converters features available for wider or more telephotos.
3. Less noise suppression, but this could be a disadvantage depending on your liking. I find that too much noise suppression really only cause the image to become less real, and H9 higher noise suppression for even low ISO is actually not a good idea to my liking. At least with the S5, I'll be able to know that, say, if I've set it to a high ISO and find that the image is too noisy, I can switch it to a lower ISO and try to steady up my hand, this way, I'll be able to get more accurate result.
4. S5 uses SD card format, it's more common and much less expensive than Sony's memory stick.
5. S5 uses AA batteries, instead of Li-Ion, this to me is a better option, as it's cheaper to get spares rechargeables, easy to buy AA anywhere if I'm on an extended trip, or if I just happen to run out of battery.
On the other hand, the H9 offers: -
1. a better zoom range of 31mm - 465mm, although distortion at these extreme are more apparent than the S5.
2. night mode, which I think is more gimmick than function.
3. faster shot-to-shot time, if you intent to captures lots of sports/ kids running around, etc, than this is a plus.
4. faster flash recharge due to the lithium ion rechargeable, compared to S5 AAs.
etc etc.
Just read through online reviews to get an idea of what features appeal more to your particular needs.
dpreview.com/reviews/compar... URL will compare these two cameras' specifications.
Also be sure to view the sample photos for each camera and judge quality for yourself.
Lastly, be sure to go to a camera store and hold each camera in your hands to determine fit and feel which can be a major factor in your purchase.
Enjoy, Larry
I was going through some of the comparisions on some sites and I found that features I am looking for Can be found in S5 IS.
But there is one thing I found out, and that is about the LCD Display. I read that LCD Display is not all that good as compared to H9 ?
I also found in the DPReview site (link above) that H9 is SLR Like Digital Camera while S5 is rated as Compact.
Can somebody please clarify my doubts on this ?
Thanks !!
I own a S5, and I find that the LCD is quite sufficient, even in bright outdoor situations. There even a setting to brighted up the LCD a notch if required. I haven't use the H9 before so I couldn't comment on the LCD, most probably it could be better, but for me, in the end, it's what the camera offered that was important.
Since you say the S5's features matches you more, go have a look and test out the feel of the camera and the LCD at a shop to see whether it fits your needs!
The LCD's are similar, but the S5is has a more versatile Flip and Twist arrangement.
The S5is LCD is 2.5 inches with 207,000 pixels while the H9 LCD is 3 inches with 230,000 pixels which is not a significant difference. Check them out in person at the camera store.
The S5is LCD is easier to see in bright light than the H9's.
If the features of the Canon S5is suit you better AND it feels comfortable in your hands (fit and feel) and easy to operate controls, then you have a winner.
You mention that with the Canon S5 you get "silent and smooth zooming in movie mode", does this mean you can zoom in and out while taking the movie? I couldn't find a reference to this feature for S5 in dpreview or in the Canon user manual, although it is mentioned for the Sony DSC H9...
I'm also a little confused with shot-to-shot times and flash recycling time, since I have found some tests showing that the Canon is actually faster (imaging-resource.com/PRODS/... versus imaging-resource.com/PRODS/... trying to decide between the H9 and S5 and have come to the conclusion that Canon offers somewhat better quality (less blur, distortion, purple fringing) but Sony has some more impressive features (15x zoom, nightshot, remote control, 3" display). So any help will be greatly appreciated!!
Thanks!!
Nicholas
I'm not really sure about the H9 shot-to-shot time, the S5 typically gives about 1.2 fps at the highest resolution (without continuous focusing) and about 0.8fps with continuous focusing. This is typically ok for me, but could have been better, I guess, but this is not an SLR, so can't complain. Flash recycling time, again I'm not sure about H9, for the S5, the flash recycling time is stated to be around 4 to 5 seconds, which coincided with my experience of it. And everytime I want to shoot with flash, I'll have to wait for a few second before I can shoot! On flash recycling time, it would probably be safe to assume that the H9 will be faster, since it uses a Li-Ion propriety battery.
One thing on the S5, I found that the Noise at higher ISO to be very high! If you plan to shoot with ranges of ISO, then S5 might be a tad disappointing. On this note, I read that panasonic's 18x superzoom performs extremely well throughout its ISO range due to its better in camera noise reduction software processing. I just found a website www .popphoto. com that gives very statistical reviews on camera, maybe you can have a read there!
Everything about the S5 is extremely good, touch, feel, hold, built quality, lens, AA batteries, SDHC card. All apart from having stellar image quality (on higher ISO, ie. anything above ISO 200)! have a read at the review site.
Canon PowerShot S5is
Kodak EasyShare Z712is
Casio Exilim EX-V7
Fuji Finepix S700
If anyone can add to this list please do and I will share with everyone. Thanks, Larry
Larry, the Sony DSC-H9 and H5 also zoom optically during video (see dpreview.com/reviews/sonyh9... Apparently video quality is not very good on the Sony H9 though, because of MPEG-1 compression. The Canon S5 produces larger files, but you can always buy more memory...
Nicholas
And, yes, memory is getting cheaper, faster and bigger all the time. I just bought a Panasonic SDHC 8MB Class 6 card!
Here's the link to the panasonic FZ-18: popphoto.com/cameras/4837/p... image quality is top of your list, this is probably the better choice, on the other hand, if taking video is priority, then S5 is still the best choice. Again, looks, feel and built quality, S5 is top of the line, so to me it was a shame that picture quality was not there to match, maybe they should have included RAW in the package... as RAW enable superb high ISO+ high resolution shots for Canon G9!
Another thing on the S5, I've confirmed with Canon and they informed me that 4GB SDHC card is the maximum for this camera, anything higher will cause the operation to be very slow (in their own words), so limit yourself to 4GB SDHC, class 6 is the best!
Andrew
"Vanity Fairy": The dpreview site actually gives a better review for the Canon S5 (8,1 average total score) than the Sony H9 (7,7) and the S5 beats H9 in "Image Quality", "Optics", "Build & Quality", "Ergonomics & Handling". The H9 doesn't beat the S5 in any category. See dpreview.com/reviews/canons... and dpreview.com/reviews/sonyh9... Also check the sample movies from the S5 and H9 in the same site: the H9's movie quality is much worse because of the MPEG-1 compression it uses.
The infrared & remote control are nice to have, but how often do you actually use them? Having AA batteries, SD card and good movie quality (plus taking photos during a movie!) is much more important to me...
Remote control are useful, but not essential, we could just make do with the "delay" shooting - i.e. shoot with the timer, which is easily set on the S5 and most other cameras where there's a dedicated timer button, and on S5, you can easily set different time for the timer...
S5 will top the list of movie quality for a digital camera. Only thing is the capacity of the cards! 4GB cards will only give about 32 minutes of video at the highest capacity, so to make use of the 60minutes limit, you'll have to shoot at a lower quality setting, either the LP 640x480 or the 30fps 320x240, either way, it will still be of higher quality than H9 MPEG-1 compression!
So again, if video is the deciding factor for your purchase, then get S5. If image quality is the deciding factor get Canon G9! If zoom is the deciding factor, get Panasonic FZ-18. If useless gimmicks are the order of the day, then by all means, get H9! haha!
IM THE VANITY FAIRY, BABY!, Actually, you sort of get the idea of the value of the camera from the package sold by the manufacturer! I.e. why did they throw in all the extras in! Because they know it's the common sense thing to do to entice consumers to buy their camera against competitors who produces a higher quality camera, if you get what I mean! -ditto- with Canon, if they think that say H9 is on par with its' S5, they would do the same and throw in the same extras in their package...
That may have been due to some quality issues. I had similar issues with my old extended zoom and switched over to dSLR and will never go back. I know its a bit more expensive, but they are so much more versatile and responsive. Good luck in your search.
Andrew
If you read the reviews on these cameras at dpreview.com you will find actual measured values for the shutter lag. However, some definitions are in order since they break the timings down into first part and second part. The first is time to focus (shutter button half-way down) and set exposure, detect faces etc., and the second is the actual "shutter" time (from half pressed to full pressed). Usually they also give a combined full press time. BUT don't expect your camera to focus if you skip the half-pressed position. These P&S cameras all take some time to focus. If you just press the button all the way down all at once, it will take a picture immediately without focusing properly. So prefocusing at the halfway position is critical to reducing shutter lag into the .1 and less range. Some P&S digital cameras also allow you to focus lock so the camera can then take pictures without having to refocus, and this will reduce the "shutter lag" also. Continuous shooting modes typically make use of this option to speed the shot to shot time by only focusing on the first picture.
Bottom line, Andrew has it right -- if you want to virtually eliminate shutter lag you have to go to dSLR, but if you practice some shooting techniques with P&S cameras you can reduce the lag into the 0.01-0.10 range which may be acceptable.
1. The Sony felt better in my hands than the Canon. I had a better grip and the camera was better balanced. Both handled equally well in all other respects.
2. Both cameras seemed to display little difference in composing and taking a full auto picture. I do believe the Sony was a bit more responsive in "dependable" focusing and speed of focus.
3. As for macro photography, I believe the Sony rendered a slightly better picture in that the color balance and contrast were more pleasing to my eye. There was no distinguishable difference in clarity and sharpness between the Sony or Canon
4. For portraits, the Sony won hands down. The flesh tones rendered were significantly better with the Sony. As for clarity, the overall appeal was slightly in favor of Sony primarily due to the fantastic flesh tones and the general smoothness of color throughout the picture. Not to say the Canon wasn't good, it was great...just that the Sony had an edge on color quality.
5. Landscape shots were found equally good. I focussed in on several shots of birds and there was an edge given to Canon on sharpness but the Sony won out due to the across the board smoothness of color and the overall pleasing visual quality of the print.
6. Flash photos were both equally good without a clear winner but that color thing, that you're sick of hearing me talk about, was again the winner for me. The scales tilted in favor of the H9 for me.
8. Both cameras put the Minolta 35mm to shame in color rendition. There are, as you know, many variables with film, developing chemistry, and so on. Yet, as far as sharpness, the Minolta held its own with both the digitals though not necessarily better than either the S5 or H9.
So, what did I buy...I bought Sony, not because of specifications and other peoples opinions but on a side-by-side comparison with the way I take pictures, what I take pictures of, the process I have them developed and judged what my eyes told me about the two different cameras. Both cameras are great, I just preferred the Sony.
Hope this has helped.
I would say that a side by side comparison is definitely the best way to pick between two items, not just cameras. Thanks for your insight on this (from one "supposed expert" to another).
Andrew
Well, if it is high resolution, and fast photo you need, then it's best to get a dSLR, since you have several lenses, it's probably best to go with a Nikon that takes them... pricey though!
I've hear the Nikon D80 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) will accept more lenses than the newer cameras. You might give that a try if you want to make the investment.
Andrew
Instead, I bought a Canon S5IS as a stopgap to Canon eventually putting a decent adapter for their older FD lenses. I do own some very serious glass and it's all lost.
So far, in about a year, I've taken well over 3000 photos and the camera stands up well. Yhe big dilemma I have when taking some action is whether or not to shoot in the "continuous" mode or the S5 "movie" mode. Unfortunately, it's impossible to print anything in the movie mode (AVI file). This mode however yields some invaluable history and the operator can shoot as long as the card will hold.
One of the big factors that influenced my choice is the fact that the camera accepts AA batteries. While the operator could go for the ordinary AAs, they have virtualy no power and will probably last about a half-hour under normal shooting contitions. They'll surely drain very quickly in the "movie" mode!! I opted instead tof the NiMH batteries; the higher the milliamperage, the better.
Ihe shutter is noiseless but it has a nice selection of sounds in the menu and I like a nice loud "click", just like in the old days. In the movie mode, it's noiseless. The movie button is a bit dinky but I've operated it with gloves in the winter (at 10 below), shooting railroad at trackside. One warning with the movie mode is that you have to know when to start and stop the camera, as there is a very small delay (.2 sec or so) before the movie mode starts. Also, you have to leave a bit of room at the end. It's esay to zoom while shooting but it may not be as smooth as desired, if the camera is not tripod-mounted.
There are lots and lots of bells and whistles on the S5IS it's an excellent choice for the well-versed amateur. With an optical zoom of a bit over 400mm equivalent to a 35mm, it's worth its weight in gold to acquire far detail if needed. Mind you, getting closer is much better but sometimes, there isn't the choice.
For its price, the Canon S5IS is a worthy alternative to any EOS, without getting soaked to death by the price, giving of course that it's not as robust and perhaps lacking certain features, such as RAW.
Before I buy an EOS, I will certainly be looking for the successor to the S5IS but so far, my S5 is a real gem.
I forgot to add that, following my retirement as Manager of Photo Services at a large Canadian Airforce Base, I was employed as a photographer in a large museum and, when chemicals interfered with my health, worked for some years selling cameras. I am now completely retired but photography is still in my blood and I use the S5IS about every second day to take anything from 5 pics to 100 or more.
Thanks for the excellent write-up on the S5is. I really appreciate your effort to share the information. With your experience I bet you could write a book!
Well done.
Please keep us enlightened in any manner that you can think of !!
Reads user comments in pricegrabber, they are very helpful.
I hope this will help you a bit.... All the best
Dibyendu
Confused.
Advise please.
Both of these cameras are very versatile. The Sony H9 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) will probably work better in low light situations, but the Fuji A800 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is more compact and will travel better. There are a lot of cameras available under $400, so you might want to go through DCHQ's Gift Guide ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) to find just the right camera for you. Good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
Andrew
So many options. My Sony H2 is in the shop. I've owned it for a year now (still under warranty) and the AF stopped working.
I googled it and it seems the the H2 has a problem with this, the Auto Focus just quits and (sometimes) it can be repaired.
This is disappointing, since the camera is among the very fastest in shutter lag and start up time. I miss it, but I also learned there the H2 has a problem with shutter buttons just popping off and disappearing! Mine hasn't done this, but it makes me question Sony Digicams for build quality. So now what do I do...I'm a writer/ photographer for a local newspaper and I need a camera right away. My H2 won't be back from the shop until after the holidays and even then, I'm not sure I can depend on it to continue to operate. I went to Best Buy and looked at at least ten of the cameras they have on display. I didn't like any of them, including the canons, the olympus or fujifilms. I didn't even bother with the Nikons, since they're prohibitely expensive and complicated. The Kodak Z812 IS wasn't too bad, but the pics were grainy. The Sony H3 took nice photos, and was reasonably fast shutter and startup, but it has the same shutter button and AF mechanisms and I fear they too will fail.
I'm just about ready to just go back to my old Nikon N80 and (shudder) wait for my prints to come back from Rite Aid.
Does anyone have any suggestions for a very good Point and Shoot, with at least 10X zoom, very fast shutter and reasonable start up times. One that has decent battery life and is not prone to mechanical failure?
I'm listening..
thanks -
Scott - Milton, Wa.
You might try the Canon A570 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). I have had great luck with Canon's, and think they are very user friendly. If you don't want to move to a dSLR, this might be the way to go.
Andrew
I'll check the Canon A570 out. Right now, I've borrowed a Kodak Z712 and so far, it's fairly quick for start up and initial shot speeds, but the pic quality is not as good as my H2. I may just wait until the next generation of prosumer cameras come out.
That is, if the H2 comes back fixed, and doesn't falter before then.
scott
Andrew
my budget is only US$425. And i also need Higher optical zoom.
Can you please tell me that is this camera is good for "FASHION PHOTOGRAPHY" or not? And what is the overall rating of this camera?
If you really want to get into fashion photography, I would recommend a dSLR camera ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). You will have more flexibility with lenses and speed. You can get a decent used/refurbished one on eBay. I found a used one with three lenses and a camera bag a couple years ago for $400. If you look for the right deal, you can get what you want.
If you want to get this camera, it will be just "OK" for fashion shoots.
Andrew
-Michael
Andrew
You're probably going to get more out of the Sony H9 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). It has more optical zoom, a wider range in ISO settings, and the HDTV output settings. I would still set the camera with the same settings to shoot the way you want to.
Andrew
Andrew
Superb camera, I have had mine for about 3 months, and I am very happy with it! Definately better than the H9.
When you get used to the camera's functionality, you can start playing with the different fuctions
Step 1 - Try something new.
Step 2 - It doesn't work the way you want it to.
Step 3 - Get help, read your manual, ask questions, go to the camera store and ask questions, read internet forums and ask questions...
Step 4 - Go out next time with new knowledge and new ideas on how to make that shot work for you.
Step 5 - Have lots of fun learning how to get the most out of your camera. You'll be making lots of good memories.
Larry
The ISO 3200 setting will make this work a lot better in low light settings. The trade off for that is some "noise" or graininess in the photo. If you want to use a lower ISO setting, the image stabilization will help with camera shake on longer shutter openings. As for the movie quality, it will depend on the zoom, available light and ISO setting used. Good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
The ISO 3200 setting will make this work a lot better in low light settings. The trade off for that is some "noise" or graininess in the photo. If you want to use a lower ISO setting, the image stabilization will help with camera shake on longer shutter openings. As for the movie quality, it will depend on the zoom, available light and ISO setting used. Good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
You're going to get sharper photos with the 12MP resolution Canon A650 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). You do have half the zoom capabilities though, if that makes a difference. As for low light situations, you need to look at the max aperture settings for the cameras. You get a slightly wider aperture with the Canon S5 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), but not enough to make a difference. Another factor to look at is the ISO settings, as I mentioned in another answer ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) to some of your questions. If you use a higher ISO setting, you will have a more visible photo in low light, but you do increase the amount of "noise" or graininess in the photo. I would also recommend a tri-pod or mono-pod for low light settings. You will decrease the amount of camera shake even more when using these. Good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
Do you mean, can the movie hear the clicking sound while shooting? If so, it shouldn't be that bad. Which camera were you asking about for the movie quality?
Andrew
Thank you for your answer. The A950 IS or the A650 IS, canon are the ones I am currently thinking of buying. The clicking was more audible while shooting in the 650. For both A quality pictures and movie shooting, should I go ahead with the A950 IS and ignore the clicking sound while shooting especially when and if zooming.?
I have honestly not shot movies with either of these cameras. If you want to get a demo, you might be able to go down to a Circuit City or Best Buy in your area and test the cameras on site before buying. I would recommend that to anyone buying a camera. The camera should feel comfortable in your hand, and it gives you a better idea of the features before you buy. If I heard the more audible click and zoom when shooting video, it would bother me, and I would go with the quieter camera (if I was shooting more video).
Andrew
Thanks so much for this website, Carol
Good luck picking out a camera and happy shooting :).
Good and bad really depends on what you want to do with the camera. I'll outline some of the differences below (the H9 will be listed first):
- Megapixels: 8.1 vs 10
More megapixels gets you a sharper picture
- Optical zoom: 15x vs 3x
More optical zoom gets a higher quality zoom amount for the camera
- ISO: 80-3200 vs 100-1600
Higher ISO levels allow for better shooting in lower light. Lower levels allow for less "noise" or granulation in the photo
These are the major differences. Personally, I would choose the H9 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) because of the higher optical zoom and the larger ISO availability. The lower resolution isn't that much of a problem for me because at 8.1 MP, you can still print poster size photos. I hope this helps.
Andrew
There are much better options available to you that are more affordable. Like the Canon S5IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), SONY H9 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), and my personal fave the Olympus SP550UZ ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ).
Please explain.
Anita, glad you see you found the best camera for you.
in my mind, not really worth it.
I have many 24x36 blowups from my old Minollta film SLR and I recently switched to the Sony ALpha, (10.1 megapixels) using all my old lenses. I get great shots and blowups, but carrying my heavy 70-300 zoom lens gets to be a pain, so I was looking for a good super zoom to help alleviate this problem. I also was considering the Olympus SP550 UZ but have read less than great reviews plus it has no manual focus - amazingly. Any suggestions?
Thanks,
Mort Ostfeld in sunny Florida
It does have a manual setting though.
There are other options too, like the Olympus SP-550 with 18x zoom, and in the near future the Fujifilm S8000 and the Panasonic FZ18 will be available too, both with 18x zoom. Of course, all this ultra zoom cameras have their issues, so you should check on each one before making you decision. Check out the forums, dpreview.com is a good place to ask.
For any field the A100 is the better option, but not for zooming unless you get one of those really big and expensive lenses.
And when all things are equal, it may just come down to what camera feels good in your hand. Go to a local camera store and check both out side by side, holding them, feeling their center of gravity, the balance. How it sits in your hand. That usually sells me one way or the other.
Canon processing is more hands off. So detail is much better. Canon lets you choose from 3 levels of compression. File sizes are larger and there is much more room for editing on the PC. Difference between the sony and canon are evident when images are zoomed to 100%.
If you just want to shoot images and look at them on the computer or print them, the sony will serve you very well. That would be my choice in that situation. The sony's flash shots look better, and the flash range is much longer. I like sony's output in low light better too. If I could have changed the compression factor, to a super high quality mode thereby preserving detail, I wold have kept that.
If you want to preserve detail, tweak your images and have sharper prints, the canon is for you. I use super high quality mode. Any noise from ISO's 200 - 800 can be cleaned up quite well with a program called Neat Image. The low light output can be processed to exceed Sony's output. You can also use free software like GIMP or PhotoFiltre to clean and edit your images, but nothing beats Neat Image for noise removal, at least when the noise is bad. The canon is also easier to use if your are going to be changing settings on the fly. Canon also has a custom settings mode. That is a real nice touch and very useful as you advance a a photographer.
Bottom line, Canon's output is shaper but may require some cleaning at iso 200 or 400 and up. However, you retain control and for me that was what did the sony in. If I could afford both, I would have kept both. I can say, I am looking forward to Sony's next offering (DSC-H10?). I liked the night vision. Cool toy.
Lens flaring and chromatic aberration are an issue with both camera's so forget about that. That is the result of squeezing a big lens into a small package.
The only other camera i would consider in the category is The Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ7. Superior optics and stabilization, but for me the output is a little flat. However, there may be internal settings to change that. Both the Canon and the Sony have settings to add vibrancy to photos. The Panasonic may too.
No, the H9 should work with pretty much any memory stick brand. These reviews ( amazon.com/SanDisk-Ultra-Me... ) for a Sandisk memory stick explicitly state that it works with the H9, so I think you'll be fine with any reputable brand.
Good luck!
I just got the H9 and have been looking into filters. There are several issues here I can see.
The filter size is so big because it is designed to fit onto the large lens hood supplied with the camera. This means it can only be fitted when the lens hood is on. Also, the lens cap will not fit over it. (Or at least I can't find out how to do it!) So you can't just leave the filter on to protect your lens. You wouldn't want the hood on all the time anyway, even if the lens cover could be fitted on top as apart from being large and bulky, the hood leaves a shadow when pics are taken with flash.
Also, it is very difficult to get size 74mm filters other from the very expensive sony site.
Apparently there is a 74mm to 72 mm (which is easier to find) converter available, but I havent been able to find one.
There is someone selling a UV and polarizing filter on ebay, but they are non Sony and mostly seem OK according to reviews, but you can't use the polarizing filter with zoom or you get out of focus distortion apparently.
Hope this helps!
PS I love the H9, but do not love the quality of pictures taken. They look ok on screen, even a large TV, but definately not printed. They are not nearly as good as my old compact P200, but I'm sure some of that will be operator error - I am going to dedicate some time and effort to learning more!
Hope we did not buy a lemon as I will get shot by wife if I did.
clark
I'm still testing my H9... took some pictures of my children and dog playing at a park around 7-8pm just before the sunset. I set it at auto to see how it would react in the time setting. I took along my Canon SD750 and took the same shots. Canon was very consistent and its pictures were sharp and natural. Sony however was inconsistent, flash was used ramdomly and pictures came out bluish whereas canon used flash each time and produced warm and clar pictures. After sunset sony took better pictures, less noise than canon, but had watercolor effects. I'm leaning toward keeping the H9, but still not sure if I'm making the right decision. I'm curious if canon S5 is better.
Looking down the road I see an outlay for a HD-DVD player/recorder. Then I can make HD disks and reuse the memory sticks. Other wise I will have to stock up on memnory sticks for data storage in HD.
clark
Looking down the road I see an outlay for a HD-DVD player/recorder. Then I can make HD disks and reuse the memory sticks. Other wise I will have to stock up on memnory sticks for data storage in HD.
clark
Looking down the road I see an outlay for a HD-DVD player/recorder. Then I can make HD disks and reuse the memory sticks. Other wise I will have to stock up on memnory sticks for data storage in HD.
clark
I am not using a duo pro memory stick. Is this a possible reason or is this camera defective? How to improve? Suggestions?
The type of memory used shouldn't affect the images in any way.
When you say "enlarging to near maximum" do you mean to 100% or beyond 100%? Images from any camera will distort and blotch if magnified beyond 100%.
Thanks.
It seems that when down loading the H9 pictures the file size is much smaller then the Cannon 20D which I made a comparsion with. The Cannon files are about 4 megs. The H9 files only about 1.5 megs.
Are you adjusting the noise levels in the camera or with your computer?
New camera guy, if you can ask your instructor about the file size issue this may lead to an answer.
Press the Menu button and the Image Size should come up, that is where you choose 8M. This is even if you have it in the Auto mode. I adjust the noise levels in PhotoShop, but I think you are supposed to be able to adjust it on the camera also. Since the camera shoots in JPEG, I always download and Save As a PhotoShop file and after I have "cleaned up" and adjusted levels, contrast, and color, I save back to a JPEG if I am going to send on the Internet, otherwise, if I am going to print, I print from the PhotoShop file. After I do all of that in Photoshop, I end up with some very large files. I actually had some that were over 200 meg large, but the clarity and quality were tremendous. I would recommend a good photo editting program for everyone...it makes all the difference. My instructor recommends PhotoShop.
You should also be able to adjust the jpeg compression from the shooting menu. In Canon cameras, this is directly above or below the resolution setting. The settings are usually something like Normal, Fine, Superfine. You should choose Superfine for the best results. Sorry if this is obvious. :]
Sorry but I can not find any mention of compression on the camera nor in the handbook. Any other hints to find it as the file is sure compressed somewhere or at least altered from the raw sensor data.
Overall I am not happy with Sony H9 and wants to sell mine ASAP so that i can get S5 IS. Let me know if you are interested ;) I hope this will help you in the judgment. All the best
Regards,
Dinesh Sharma
astrologerdinesh@hotmail.com
+91 9871347184
astrologerdinesh@hotmail.com
I did a bit of searching and all I could turn up was this conversation ( forums.dpreview.com/forums/... ), which seems to indicate that the H9 has mono sound in video mode (though it also shoots in HD, which is strange). The conversation is a direct comparison of the two cameras you're thinking about. This page ( digitalcamerainfo.com/conte... ) also seems to indicate that it's mono.
Honestly, these are both very good cameras for the kind of shooting it sounds like you're looking to do. I personally tend to lean toward Canon because I prefer the general look of the images their cameras produce (this is really splitting hairs, though). I have the older S2 IS and love it to death.
I think picking either camera would be a good choice. If you want to save a little money, you might consider the S3 IS or H5, the prices of which must be dropping like stones right now.
Good luck!
--Lord Nigel Featherston
Regards,
Ron
original (largest, ~3cm),
Duo (middlesize, ~2cm)
and the new Micro (~1cm)
the small ones are usually sold/accompanyed with special adapters that makes possible to use them in older/bigger slot devices
Pro is just faster version that gives other some advantages like HQ video recording for digicameras
obviously the original larger Memory Stick (Pro) can not be used in devices with smaller slots (Duo, Micro)
thanks for that,
Regards
Ron
You probably has to handle the cameras to find out how much more pictures can you get with the 2mm difference and whether this is/is not outweighed by other features such as optical image stabilization of H9.
Will the Cybershot H9 afford me the simple luxury of attaching basic filters onto the end of the lens and still allow the cap to cover it all?
Sony manufacturer's home page states that this camera comes with lens adapter tread. So you should be able to attach filters. But I don't think that you can use the same cap to cover filters or other attachments. Point and shoot camera lenses are very small and fragile so the lens adapter usually allows to attach to the camera body instead of lens itself.
I own an DSC-H1 to which you can attach a filter ONLY via an adaptor. The only superzoom which takes a filter directly (that I know of) is the LUMIX FZ50.
Question: Did you determine if you can attach a filter direct to the lens barrel of the SP-550?
sonystyle.com/is-bin/INTERS...
Many cameras have issues, and they're rarely entirely brand-related. Some brands make several totally awesome models and several lemons. For instance, while lots of Sony's ultracompacts have issues with "white orbs" and severe red-eye, users by and large tend to love the H2 and H5.
Now, as to whether you can take it for granted that flaws in previous models would be rectified in new ones... well, you can NEVER take these things for granted, unfortunately. It's certainly likely that if enough people complain about them, the company will look at fixing them in the next revision, but that's only common sense, and corporations rarely seem to follow common sense.
Sorry if this is vague, but I hope it helps a bit.
I hope Sony has rectified it. For I am keen on buying a Sony H9 camera myself.
I hope this helps a bit.
Sony Cybershot H9 Reviews
Sony Cybershot H9 Reviews by Digital Camera-HQ Users
- 4.0 out of 5
This was my first camera, and it gave a good experience with its manual mode, as a tool which gave the forecast about the extremities I can go with an SLR.
- 4.0 out of 5
very good device. it fulfills the purpose. recommended for use.
- 2.0 out of 5
I am really regretting for having this camera which do not justify its price.Theoretically it has stunning features when you read its specs but picture quality is poor.I am now planning to buy an other one but never sony.So please dnt buy it.
- 2.0 out of 5
When I first got the camera, it was great and took pretty decent pics. However, several months later, it developed a small blue line showing up in the lower left-hand side of some of the pics—more visible in darker ones. I sent it in to Sony and the camera shop did some stuff and sent it back. When I took it on vacation, it was way worse than before. The small blue line is gone, but in dark shots, a whole lot of lines appear across the photos that weren't there before.
I'm going to try to send it back to Sony, but if they don't make this right, then I may never buy another Sony digital camera again. Me and a friend of mine seem to have the best results with Olympus, so that may be my next camera if this one fails me again.
- 4.0 out of 5
Such a super fast startup and everything about it i love so much. it can be confusing for people who might not know too much about cameras, but i love it nonetheless. my mom took my senior pics with it and everything about it is amazing. the batteries are great and it does awesome!
- 2.0 out of 5
I loved this camera when I first got it. The stabilizer and zoom worked so well together hat I was able to great photos under difficult circumstances. Then the first problem
developed. I missed some action photos only because the selector knob became difficult to turn. Over time this problem
grew so bad that it would not turn at all. Frustrated, I called
Sony support. I had to send the camera to Lorado, Texas for
repair and wait for three weeks for it to be returned. Now, only ten months after I purchased the camera, I'm about to set off for a business trip and the camera is again in need of
repair. This time it is a whole new problem. The camera only
occasionally recognizes the memory card. More time wasted
calling Tech Support and once again I'm faced with a three week wait while I send the camera off for repair. With no help from Sony I now have to chose between travelling without a digital camera or purchasing a new camera - and it
won't be a Sony!
- 5.0 out of 5
Photgraphing has been my hobby since 1970 and I have had a lot of cameras since then. This is my fifth didgital camera and this is simply the best. I am very pleased with every thing but mostly with the improved possibility to take good pictures in bad light conditions.
- 4.0 out of 5
I had an Olumpus came & wanted to upgrade my camera.I surfed the net almost for a month to buy a new digital camera,untill i zeroed down to the H9. Its a great camera when you see the features and also very handy to use,except for the accessory part.The Co.has to change the design or the size of the lens hood,which is part of the pack since it comes in way of the flash and a shadow appears on the photo. Can the concerned look into it ????????
- 5.0 out of 5
I was in need of something to film my 2 sons high school wrestling careers. I was using a Kodak DX6490 still camera & the video was awful, but it worked. The still photos were decent, but low light conditions were poor. I started looking for a video camera, not really wanting one, and the salesman pointed me towards the H-9. The video capabillity seemed very good for a still camera, and the "steady shot" was excellent. I have since "filmed" 7 matches in low light HS gyms, with very good results. The ability to zoom while recording was new to me and a great advantage. "No flash" photos in low light with this camera seem very good, also. These are action shots in low light, and the pics are great. The optics appear to be very good, and I've even taken some shots using a lot of the digital zoom, and was very surprised at the quality, if you can hold still enough. I've played the videos back on a 27" TV, and the picture is as good as any broadcast picture. The battery seems small, and I'm sure that for all day tournaments I will need a spare, but that's a minor thing to me. I do wish the AC power cord would have been included.
- 5.0 out of 5
As an advanced amateur, yet unwilling to pay the high price for a digital SLR, I find the H9 more than fills the gap where point-n-shoot models leave off and SLR flexibility begins. The built-in flash far outperforms typical point-n-shoot. The 15x zoom capability combined with 8.1 megapixels means I can photograph distant wildlife or sporting events from afar and then crop later to achieve the desired photo. The night mode works better than the human eye when the sun goes down. Although surprisingly lightweight, it still has a solid, quality feel about it. The display is hinged so you can adjust it, allowing you shoot over top of tall people and fences without guessing where the lens is pointing—an amazing feature unknown to point-n-shoot or SLR models. Annoyances include a frustrating inability to add filters without adding a bulky Sony-proprietary adapter. The wide angle accessory is heavy, but comes in handy when photographing large objects at close range. The image stabilization makes shooting one-handed easy, and the resulting picture quality is superb. I purchased two extra batteries and you'll need a memory stick.
- 5.0 out of 5
I have only owned my Sony H9 for 1 month but I really do like it. I used to have a Fuji finepix 4 megapixel and it was good but this one is much better. I love the super close zoom because I take a lot of photos of my daughter in ballet and am looking forward to being able to zoom in on her and it does so much better with action shots than my fuji did. The big LCD screen is great and I put a screen protector on it and it still looks great and I don't' have to worry about scratches. I have not tried the video mode yet but my other camera had no sound but did video so I am sure I will love that to. I love that you can do a slideshow of your photos on the screen with music. That is really cool!!! The only thing that I did not like is the dial on the back is a little sensitive. You have to push it on the exact spot or it will not do what you are wanting it to, ie: deleting photos. That is no big deal to me. It takes great photos and I am not worried about using the manuel controls. I have a card reader hooked to my computer so I can put any card in it and see my photos without hooking the camera up to the computer. I don't think its cheaply designed or that it feels cheap. I don't want a heavy bulky camera that I hate taking around. I think Sony is an excellent product and that you will love this camera.
- 4.0 out of 5
I had a Sony Cybershot prior to this Sony. I find the same problem as the 1st in that the battery and ports are made of cheap plastic.
The camera before plastic battery cover broke and I had to tape it for use.
In spite of this I purchased it because I am pleased with the lens and quality of pictures.
- 4.0 out of 5
Well this camera does have a great zoom but the night photos to kinda suck. I had a Panasonic TZ1 and that thing has taken some awsome night pictures. This one takes good night pictures but just not as good : ( if you play around with the manual settings like i did you can get some pretty good pics.
- 5.0 out of 5
I wanted a digital camera that gave me more. When I finaly decided to spend the money on that, I was anxious about finding one that was right for "ME". I gotta tell ya, this is it! The manual is simple to read, and isn't full of technology that a normal person wouldn't understand. The camera is very self explanatory, but yet packed with so much technology! The color you get from your photos are very bold and crisp! I have four children, my biggest disappointment in my old cameras were that I just didn't have the speed I needed. Nor the quick focus to capture those sudden moves. This camera definatly solved that! I wanted Digital SLR speed with a point and shoot price. lol (Yeah, I don't ask for much, do I!?) Anyway, this focuses super fast and you won't miss that action shot, guarenteed.
- 2.0 out of 5
Hi, I didn't go for that camera, when shopping around for a new camera, I insisted to test the photo on a computer screen, to see the details, and so the salesman was kind enough to give it a shot, we made sure of the light/settings and all, still you can clearly see the (processing) work done on the image it leaves subtle patterns on the photo that it does not seem natural, not to mention clear, (looks like it's been worked on using a photo editing software).
It's great to have all these features and it pained me not to have it, but hey, who wants an french chef who does not know how to make croissants!? huh! it's only clear photo, that's the basics SONY Duh!
if you are evaluating I did the same testing with Olympus SP-55OUZ, (note that I am looking for >13x zoom and around 7mp resolution, the good thing about this one is that it's got wide angle lense and 18x along with the possiblity to create uncompressed raw images)
Cheers,
Coco
- 2.0 out of 5
The only reason I bought a new camera was my Nikon D50 broke just before my daughter's wedding. I only bought the cybershot was the promise of low light photographs. I does well in low light if you don't mind blurry, motion streaked orange tinged photo I delete on the spot. I promise I'll never read another sony tinged review again. Do they take returns? If not don't buy this camera
- 2.0 out of 5
I fish late at night for muskys and need to have photos for proof of the monsters we catch late at night. This is not the camera for low light photos. They end up very grainy or just plain out of focus. This is true in "auto" mode and also in "twilight portrait" modes. The "night shot" mode is even far worse and looks like the Paris Hilton tape. I have used 3, 4, and 6 mega pixel Fujis with much better results in the dark. I may have return and pay the 15% restocking fee at best buy. That would be like paying $80 for a few blurry and grainy shots.
- 5.0 out of 5
it is the best, features galore!
- 3.0 out of 5
Please, take some time in deciding what camera best suites you. For me, there are definatly some good sides to the H9, but the down sides definatly out-number the good ones. The 3-inch LCD screen is excellent for having a good view at the picture you've taken, the menu is very organized and easy to navigate, the 15x optical zoom is really handy if you want to get really clost to your subjects and the buttons are very easy to find. The down-sides include purple fringing around objects like trees and the corners of walls. The pictures don't look like they have take from a 8 megapixel camera, the quality is'nt there and also the night-shot option delivers very grainy pictures. I would recommend the Canon S5 IS over this one.
- 4.0 out of 5
The first reaction to the camera when you remove it from the box is that it is a cheap piece of plastic junk. I read the reviews before purchase and they wanted alligator housing, blah, blah, blah. True I compared it to my Sony F828, my Cannons and old Epson. The bottom line when all comparisons were done is you buy a camera for the pictures it will take not for it's housing. It is light which with a lot of shooting is a plus. It's feature of IS works very well and its' close up work is great. It picks faces of people and renders the colors with a broad spectrum of tonality. It excels at shooting flowers and if your limited in time, gives excellent results even with point and shoot rapidity. The battery is not a long lived as I would prefer and I intend to get another one to carry with me. The night vision is adequate for most shooting of that type but not designed for color work. Maybe ghost hunting if that's your thing. Its weight won't slow you down if you see one. Bottom line is this produces excellent pictures in all areas of automatic or manual settings and definitely belongs in the semi-pros's camera bag.
- 5.0 out of 5
I am not professional photographer, but like to have a professional camera so i chose this one due to the following reason: high ISO; big screen with up and down angles; fast speed 1/4000; big zoom 15X. i have no problem to connect USB cable to the camera, but had it to remove from the the beginning, now i figured out how to remove it the from camera easily. Video is not good, i expected to have DVD quality as to replace video camera, but unfortunately, the quality of the video is just OK. New buyer should consider the following items: there is no protector for lens; battery is not popular one and can not be replaced by 2AA or 3AAA. if you run of the battery, you can not shot unless you have back battery which is very expensive. Memory stick has become more popular and cheaper than before, but still can not compete with SD or other memory device; HD cable should be included since HDTV will be popular item in the year of 2007 and later year.
- 3.0 out of 5
Im sorry, This review may never see the light of day because I believe critical reviews are NOT published. The reason for so many 5 star reviews? (HMMMMm)... well Im NOT happy with the image quality of my Sony H9 Period, the image stabilization seems to work well, but picture Noise spoil each photo I have taken. I had big hopes for this camera, because of all the 5 star reviews but Ive googled around the internet, and met a lot of other H9 owners that agree with me.
(PLEASE) before you buy google around other websites, please dont be conned like I was. I intend to return my camera for another H9 under warranty but Im not holding my breath.
- 3.0 out of 5
A light, easy to use, day camera for smaller hands. Silver function button easy to bump/change, but mistakes remedied quickly. Zoom controls difficult for large hands. 72mm filter adaptor sits in way of flash causing halfmoon shadow on pictures. Okay without the adaptor & hood, but no lens protection. Sony 1-800 not helpful. No useful adaptor apparently available. Shutter/flash sync too slow to catch slow moving objects(squirrels,anoles)at night even within 6'.
- 5.0 out of 5
I wanted a camera with a great zoom and I sure got it. The negative reviews I've read must be from folks who just don't read directions or just don't have the ability to take a picture. I've gotten some of the clearest close-up pictures. I have not been disappointed at all and it was easy. I bought it, charged it, and used it the same night! It could have come with a LCD screen protector, that's my only withdrawal. The screen is so big that I'm afraid of scratches, but I will get a protector for it. Way to go Sony! You may pay for the name, but you get what you pay for! I love it.
- 5.0 out of 5
I purchased this camera simply for the 15 x zoom. I have a Canon Elph 600, which takes great pics, bu the zoom is way too small at only 3 x. Needless to say, going from 3 to 15 x zoom is incredible. I'm still learning alot about this camera, but I love to play around with it. so far I am very pleased with my purchase. the only thing I am disappointed in is the night time shots. These always turn out very grainy. I love the green nighttime color but not sure why they are so very grainy. When I take the photos inside with just a little light on the photo is clear. Does anyone have any idea why this is happening. I'd love to take a class somewhere on the camera to learn it all! My recemmendation is that the camera is awesome and worth all the money.
- 3.0 out of 5
I actually give it a 3 1/2 star.
I bought this camera impulsively at Best Buy for $479. I loved it at first- I would have given it a 5 star then but now I know it a lot better- It was an upgrade from my Nikon 35mm. I chose this one becuase it was 8.1 meg and 15X zoom. ok, obviously I don't know everything there is to know about the camera so my review is going to be based on personal operation know- how.
*con's:
1.THE BATTERY IS A PIECE OF CRAP!- it only lasts about 4 hours- dies on me EVERYday
2. Night pictures do not have very good quality, they are blury even with the special night settings.
3. if you are taking a picture of a flower on a tree- and you have to zoom 15X it doesn't always cooperate- blury at times
4. Screen is large BUT does not close so therefore your finger prints and sratches get on it.
5. eye view finder does not work ( not to my knowledge)- MUST use screen
6. MUST BUY SONY ONLY MEMORY CARD - no universal one :(
*Pro's:
1- FUN! to use (movies- slide shows with music-LOVE THE PARTIAL COLOR THING!!!!!)
2- great HD quality- crisp/clear images!
3- red eye reduction
4- light weight
5- great zoom
6- I play with my camera everyday- I take many landscape pictures- the camera is great for that.
7- PERFECT LCD screen- very large!
8- it is a mini computer- you don't really have to read the manual very often because when you choose settings, it describes them on the screen for you:)
9. 4 or more flash options
10. picture viewing index so that you do not have to scroll through ALL the pics
I would advise you to shop around unlike I did- make sure you get the best camera you possibly can- read all the reviews for EACH camera!
Happy photo shooting! :)
- 5.0 out of 5
Out of box worked great.HD pics looked good on HD TV. Wish cable had been provided, but Sony sent one out quickly.Wonder if a data disk made to save pics will have the HD quality of the memory stick pro. I use my Sony Vaio PC and Adobe program.My thumb bumps the telephoto button by accident alot.When I turn on the lens cap pops off.Wonder if that will damage anything.Focus wheel on eye piece hard to turn but was able to get in focus with glasses off.Works great on Auto settings.Not tried manual setting as I am not good at remembering manual procedures.HD cable fits into camera only one way and seems not to stable when connected.Soon will try to use the new power adaptor I purchased, to save battery life. Don't know how many pics I will get on a 1 gb memory stick, I have two to use. No doubt I will have to use the memory sticks for storage rather than a CD as I will want to watch in HD all the time. I love it so far.Still playing around with it.
- 5.0 out of 5
I have only had my h-9 for a week and I simply love it. It was a tough decision with the other camera's out there but the night shooting sold me. I have taken over 100 pictures with the camera and the picture quality is unbelievable. The zoom is amazing and the lcd is perfect. Reviewing your pictures is easy. The are numerous add ons you can purchase to make your picture taking even better. Overall this is the best camera out there right now. From close ups to lost distant shots this camera does it all.
- 3.0 out of 5
I got my Sony H9 last week after 3 week waiting. I use it a lot since last week and honestly speaking i miss my old S2 IS camera. I donot know why people write overwhelming review. Sony H9 has nothing exceptional in comparison with other cameras in this range. My advice for all reviewers to please be bit critical in judging things. Your unnecessary generous review can spoil someone’s hard-earned money. Well, This does not mean that I totally hate this camera, but still it is not a perfect camera to get 5 points. There are few good things in Sony H9, like the picture quality (is ok, not excellent, there are some compression issues and other chromatic aberration, read dpreview for deatils), focus is fast, image stabilizer works well (again, I find it less efficient than canon, may be due to 15X zoom), LCD screen is big, ability to capture photo in near darkness is also good. But when it comes to movie, Sony H9 is a huge disappointment. You can clear hear the motor noise during playback (i donot know if my camara is defective). Moreover Sony donot have stereo sound, neither has it had 60 fps capture (now available in S5IS). You cannot take snaps in movie mode. The cable for photo transfer is clumsy and a bit difficult to attach. Remote is good addition but again it is useless because you cannot rotate the LCD to see your self-portrait.
Overall, I am not happy with Sony H9. I am writing this review so that prospective buyers can have a good look into other similar models before finalizing this one and not be fooled by not so professional reviews. All the best for yours camera hunt!!!
- 5.0 out of 5
Very easy to use, nice size, great display - true colors, fantastic results from point and shoot, manual adjustments are easy to get to, long batter life, very hih quality video for a DSC, macro shots are incredible!
The eyepiece is hard to adjust if you don't wish to use the screen display, additional lenses are expensive, USB cable is difficult and awkward to attach to the camera.
Overall I have no regrets - best value for money I could find. I love it!
- 5.0 out of 5
Outstanding camera. Good exposure and aperture control. Fabulous colours, great LCD and great shutter speed and ISO sensitivity. DVD like movies too!
- 5.0 out of 5
I upgraded from a Kodak. I have purchased 4 cameras in the past couple of weeks and even looked at the SLRs from Cannon. I take family and pictures of my boys for scrapbooking. I determined the SLR was not for me, and this is a perfect camera for me. I have already taken shots today, easy out of the box. They are crisp, clear and great color. The software is great and very easy to use! I am so glad I upgraded and got this one!
- 5.0 out of 5
Great shooting quality, wonderful slideshow option,and so on. Flash is wonderful even in dark places you shoot as if you were in the midday. Also Video recording quality is as good as a video camera. I wish the mode dial button were better.I mean it must be a little bit hard to turn.That's the only negative point I want to mention.
- 5.0 out of 5
Previously I have owned the Cybershot H1, a Nikon, Canon and also a Fuji. I am absolutely thrilled with this camera. Little effort is needed to make the most superb pictures. Extremely easy to transfer on to computer or watch your pictures on TV. I enjoy looking at the slideshow accompanied by music on the actual camera too. Manipulation on the camera is simple too. There are so many possibilities with this beauty and at the same time it can be used for just point and shoot. It's fabulous and easy to understand. The large screen is crisp and clear and the buttons are easy to use. Ad I take many pictures in doors one of my favourite settings is the shooting in low light conditions. Great! All in all a very good buy.
- 5.0 out of 5
This camera has been great and it's easy to use. I didn't need the owner's manual to get the pictures onto my computer. It has an enormous amount of capability, but simple enough to use as a point-and-shoot when needed. My wife loves that she can just pick it up and start shooting. At first, she was worried that it would be too complicated or time consuming. The images and performance are phenomenal. I purchased this camera based on reviews of its predecessors and the upgrades for the H9.
- 4.0 out of 5
I am an experienced amateur. I won 7 digital cameras from Kodak's,Casio's,Canon,Olympus and now Sony. I bought the Olympus 550 which took absolutely great pics, but returned it because the zoom motor noise was SO loud you could hardly hear the audio when filming. And it was only 7 meg. The Sony was a few dollars more, but the zoom motor is much less audible. I do alot of birding, horse shows, dogshows and the like. The Sony is very easy to understand, set up and operate. The menu system is easier to navigate than the Olympus 550. I wish they had a dedicated delete button, it would be more convenient. The macro quality is great, although a super macro setting and the fact that they should of made it a 10 meg would of made it an absolutely super camera.
- 5.0 out of 5
So far I am very impressed. Fast auto focus, fast shutter speed, great zoom and the pics are sharp with beautiful color. Many features in a small enough size to easily take any where you go.
- 5.0 out of 5
Traded in my SLR for the H9, couldn't be happier.
Wanted a camera for family shots,vacations.
I have fairly big hands and find no problems with the buttons. You don't have to use fingernails at all to move the wheel, a little pressure with the tip of the thumb moves it easily.
I am very impressed with how the menu is displayed
and with all the modes. Having the 1/4000 shutter speed is one of the reasons I selected this model
I have taken several shots with flash indoors and they are very good. The first shot that I took of my daughter is one my favorites. Outdoor shots are excellent, really like the zoom, the auto focus is sharp and quick
. The large flip up Lcd is very handy , saves all the bending to get a shot.
Video, while not the best quality is easy to use and can certainly be useful if camcorder is not available.
I had no trouble downloading to computer.
Only negatives points are the lens cap, has to be removed before turning camera on, or lens can't extend. Cable connection to camera is awkward to insert.
Very impresses with the H9, have been having a lot of fun with it.
- 3.0 out of 5
I was disappointed when I received the camera.
The buttons are so fiddly and you surely need good finger nails to operate the centre wheel - its ridiculous. Also felt like throwing the H9 out of the window when trying to set up the camera direct with USB with my computer (OS Windows XP Pro). The hard copy instruction manual is hopeless for info on setting up with computer di. So I cannot really say what the pictures are like as I cannot transfer from the camera storage.
Gary UK
