Sony Cybershot N2
Sony Cybershot N2
Hey! You should know that this product has been discontinued. Here are our current recommended cameras in the Ultra Compact Digital Cameras category.
Sony Cybershot N2
Editor's Review
Sony has updated the DSC-N1, giving the all-new N2 a 10-megapixel sensor on top of the already marvelous touchscreen interface and ultracompact body. The N2 is a really eye-catching camera, and the large, 3.0-inch touchscreen LCD is a real innovation in digital photography. Sony's also imbued the screen with a new ability: free-spot focusing. Simply tap the screen where you want the image to focus, and the camera will oblige. We're sad to see that Sony cut back on the internal memory. The N1 was pushed as a potential portable photo album as well, but the N2's large sensor would have neccesitated more memory and more bulk if they were to go that route. As it is, the N2 is attractive enough.
Specifications
- 10 megapixels
- 3x optical zoom
- Sony Super Steady Shot Image Stabilization
- Auto focus / "Free-Spot" selectable focus, auto and manual exposure
- Movie mode with sound
- JPEG file format
- ISO 100-1600
- Memory Stick storage (25MB internal)
- 3.0-inch touchscreen LCD
- Lithium-ion battery
- Release Date: Sep 15, 2006
Shop for N2 Accessories
Sony Cybershot N2 Comments & Questions (write your own!)
david (05/12/2011)
la pantalla tactil no me responde que puedo hacer?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (05/13/2011)
Touch screen won't work.
Me gustaría intentar restablecer la cámara de nuevo a los valores de fábrica si se puede. Debe estar en la configuración de menú, a pesar de sacar las pilas durante una media hora debe hacer el truco así. También me gustaría actualizar su firmware desde la página web de la cámara. Si todo esto no se soluciona el problema, puede ser hora de que le envíe para su reparación.
I would try resetting the camera back to factory defaults if you can. It should be in the menu settings, although taking out the batteries for a half hour should do the trick as well. I'd also update your firmware from the camera website. If that all doesn't clear up the issue, it may be time to send it in for repair.
reply to this comment
Me gustaría intentar restablecer la cámara de nuevo a los valores de fábrica si se puede. Debe estar en la configuración de menú, a pesar de sacar las pilas durante una media hora debe hacer el truco así. También me gustaría actualizar su firmware desde la página web de la cámara. Si todo esto no se soluciona el problema, puede ser hora de que le envíe para su reparación.
I would try resetting the camera back to factory defaults if you can. It should be in the menu settings, although taking out the batteries for a half hour should do the trick as well. I'd also update your firmware from the camera website. If that all doesn't clear up the issue, it may be time to send it in for repair.
n2 deleted pictures (creisse o. — 06/18/2010)
how do u restore the deleted pictures from n2?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (06/18/2010)
Get a USB card reader that takes a memory stick and then download PC Inspector. It'll scan your card and identify deleted files for recovery.
reply to this comment
What is the program for viewing the contents of .THM files? If the .thm file is lost how does one get date/time form the .MOV? (seyoki18 — 08/27/2009)
WHen shooting videos using SONY Cybershot, two files are saved. One .MOV (playable in media player) and another .THM. The second file apparently holds some useful information such as the time/date of filming. I use this info to register the actual time/date of field movies when doing research. However opening the .THM is difficult. so far I have not located an appropriate program for viewing this file properly. My second concern is in some cases the .THM files have been deleted inadverently. Is it possible to get the exact time of shooting from the .MOV?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (08/28/2009)
Well, the .MOV file should have the date/time saved as well. The THM file is essentially a "thumbnail" file and isn't really vital. But if you want to recover any, you can use a recovery program like F-Recovery.
reply to this comment
Alice Green (02/12/2012)
Googled and used this Sony Cybershot photo recovery solution anysoftwaretools.com/how-to... , pretty useful too.
reply to this comment
With PowerShot A520, I lost USB cord a while ago. Need to get photos (Teena912 — 07/07/2009)
I need to get photos internal to the camera onto either my computer or an SD card. Is it possible to get photos from the camera to an SD card in that same camera? If not, what are my options? Is the ISB cord available somewhere?
Don't know if it matters for the question, but the LCD screen is cracked. (Is it possible to fix that?) Thanks.
reply to this comment
Don't know if it matters for the question, but the LCD screen is cracked. (Is it possible to fix that?) Thanks.
by James DeRuvo (07/07/2009)
Cables4less.com. And try these guys:
AFFORDABLE CAMERA REPAIR AND CRACKED LCD SCREEN REPLACEMENT
Try darntoothysam.com/servlet/S...
reply to this comment
AFFORDABLE CAMERA REPAIR AND CRACKED LCD SCREEN REPLACEMENT
Try darntoothysam.com/servlet/S...
is it possible to recover the photos from the internal memory of a broken sony camera? (crossfox21 — 06/17/2009)
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (06/18/2009)
Depends on what you mean by broken. If it powers up, then yes. Hook it up to your computer via your USB and then your PC will read it as a drive. R/c on the camera icon, select "explore," and you can then go to the file that has the images and it's a simple drag and drop to the desktop.
reply to this comment
I have a Sony N2 and have problems with flash not being consistant. Do I have something set wrong? (Randy383 — 01/11/2009)
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (01/15/2009)
Reinitialize the camera - in the menu settings. Then, what I would do is to not rely on the "auto" flash settings, but manually set the flash to on when you're in low light situations (and in daylight, a flash can make your subject "pop" in daylight).
reply to this comment
is the manuel for N2 available in soft copy to download? (Jayaraj — 06/06/2008)
Soft Copy of User Manuel for Sony N2 available? Where I can download the same?
reply to this comment
Andrew Skinner (06/11/2008)
Jayaraj,
You can download a PDF version of the instruction manual here ( 129.33.22.12/release/DSCN2_... ). If you need it in a language other than English, try here ( esupport.sony.com/US/perl/m... ). Good luck.
Andrew
reply to this comment
You can download a PDF version of the instruction manual here ( 129.33.22.12/release/DSCN2_... ). If you need it in a language other than English, try here ( esupport.sony.com/US/perl/m... ). Good luck.
Andrew
What about the option "Download Music" What is the use of it? (Jayaraj — 05/25/2008)
Please let me know about the download music option. Whether I can download the music from PC? Whether video or only audio music?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (05/27/2008)
It's for using when in Slide Show mode. You can download music , using music transfer, to go along with the pictures while doing a slide show (Pg 75, 38, 95, 97 manual).
Install the Music Transfer utility from the CD Rom and it'll talk you through it.
reply to this comment
Install the Music Transfer utility from the CD Rom and it'll talk you through it.
Why does the videos taken have two files, one is .mov and one of which is (THM) will not burn to a CD with Roxio. (mbccobrapilot — 05/06/2008)
I'm looking for an easier way to save files other than two files for a video. My FUJI camera used one file which was an AVI file. Can I merge these or what? Also, is there a manual for this camera?
reply to this comment
Andrew Skinner (05/10/2008)
Mithcell,
The .THM file is a thumbnail file made so you can display the image on your camera before playing the video. I have found that these are not needed when creating back-ups or placing the file on CD.
Andrew
reply to this comment
The .THM file is a thumbnail file made so you can display the image on your camera before playing the video. I have found that these are not needed when creating back-ups or placing the file on CD.
Andrew
Do eyes shine in the Sony N2 model..like in every other piece?? (sagarwal14 — 11/04/2007)
Well if we go for cameras of other choice, you get those shiny eyes or maybe tiger eyes which spoil the image drastically. So does thise happen in the Sony N2 model too...coz im lookin for a camera without that thing...!!
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (11/06/2007)
You'll need to get a camera that has red eye reduction flash capability. Most models have this now. But for those shots where you end up with it, photo management software like Adobe Photoshop elements or even Picasa by Google can remove most of the red eye.
reply to this comment
discojunkie (11/07/2007)
here are a couple pictures taken with the n2 and i will let you deciede for your self
a738.ac-images.myspacecdn.c...
reply to this comment
a738.ac-images.myspacecdn.c...
by James DeRuvo (11/08/2007)
Cute shots. But I don't see any red eye issues. You could tweak it a bit in a photo editor, but they look plenty natural to me. BTW are you using the Quickpod for those shots?
reply to this comment
discojunkie (11/09/2007)
nope, its just me holding the camera with my hand on auto.
reply to this comment
Larry (01/01/2008)
Typically the red eye issue is a problem any time the flash in located close to the lens. That why they use pop-up flash units on the more expensive cameras. The other way to eliminate red eye is have plenty of ambient light there before the flash goes off. That keeps the subject's pupils contracted same as the multiple flashes referred to as red eye reduction. You'll notice that alisha's pupils are at least partially contracted in her self photos and there is virtually no red eye. Red eye happens when the pupil is wide open and the light from the flash reflects off the persons retina which is red from having lots of blood vessels covered only with clear fluid. With the pupil contracted you only see the part of the retina that has few blood vessels so doesn't reflect red.
Enjoy, Larry
reply to this comment
Enjoy, Larry
by James DeRuvo (01/03/2008)
Besdt description of redeye I've read to date. Well said, Larry.
reply to this comment
HELP is there anypossible way to get the album to download to the computer???? (discojunkie — 10/31/2007)
ok, so i just bought this camera and it came in yesterday and so far i love it.
yesterday i took a bunch of pictures and i would delete them thinking it will go into the album and you can download the whole album but you cant!!!!
i need this pictures they are important, is there anyways to download the pictures onto my computer?
if i take it to the sony store can they recover the pictures??
help i need advice
reply to this comment
yesterday i took a bunch of pictures and i would delete them thinking it will go into the album and you can download the whole album but you cant!!!!
i need this pictures they are important, is there anyways to download the pictures onto my computer?
if i take it to the sony store can they recover the pictures??
help i need advice
Matt (11/02/2007)
Hold on a second. You deleted the pictures, thinking they'd still be saved in an album (like a daily album stored on the camera)?
Those pictures are gone. There are software recovery programs like cardrecovery.com/. Try the free trial and see if it works for you :)
Read here if you need more assistance with that program: cardrecovery.com/how_to_rec... costs $20, but is supposedly guaranteed: file-saver.com/undelete/?pu... I may be a skeptic, but I don't believe undeleting off a solid state memory medium is guaranteed. I would contact Sony and ask them if they suggest any specific recovery (some memory cards recover better with different software). Most software recovery programs have free trials (as my first link shows).
If these pictures are that important that you're willing to pay good money at the Sony store, you can certainly do that. Of course, they'll just be using the same software program you could buy or get a free trial for. Heck, depending on how much they charge, you can just ask them what they use and go home and download it :)
reply to this comment
Those pictures are gone. There are software recovery programs like cardrecovery.com/. Try the free trial and see if it works for you :)
Read here if you need more assistance with that program: cardrecovery.com/how_to_rec... costs $20, but is supposedly guaranteed: file-saver.com/undelete/?pu... I may be a skeptic, but I don't believe undeleting off a solid state memory medium is guaranteed. I would contact Sony and ask them if they suggest any specific recovery (some memory cards recover better with different software). Most software recovery programs have free trials (as my first link shows).
If these pictures are that important that you're willing to pay good money at the Sony store, you can certainly do that. Of course, they'll just be using the same software program you could buy or get a free trial for. Heck, depending on how much they charge, you can just ask them what they use and go home and download it :)
Speed of Subsequent Shots (mlarson — 09/16/2007)
I'm trying to decide between the Canon Powershot SD850 IS, the Sony Cybershot W55 and the Sony Cybershot N2. I'm concerned about the speed with which I can take follow-up shots. Is there a difference in how quickly subsequent pictures can be taken with these cameras?
Thank you!
reply to this comment
Thank you!
Matt (09/18/2007)
Big difference. The N2 is ridiculously slow at both continuous shooting and between-shot shooting time. A family member has this camera, and it takes about 3 seconds just to snap a picture with flash, and then there's recharge time before you can take your next picture. Continuous shooting is a horrible <1fps (and only up to 3 pictures, for heaven's sake!) It does have a great movie mode, though, lol. And the pictures do end up turning out good.
The W55 is a lower resolution than the N2, so expect to take faster pictures (not much faster, though!) The W55 is rated at about 1.1fps for only 4 pictures. To me, that's horrible. With flash and not using continuous (ie, autofocus each shot), you're probably looking at 3 seconds per picture with flash on.
The SD850IS is the best of the 3, clocking in at around 1.3fps. This isn't that great, honestly (a lot of ultracompacts can hit 2.1-2.3fps). But this camera does 1.3fps for an unlimited amount of shots, which is unusual. For a few pictures, you'll see this number improve, especially without flash. And if you use an SDHC card with fast transfer, you should get even better improvement. And you don't need a proprietary Sony Pro card that costs twice the price.
The SD850IS is a great camera for all purposes: video, good-light pictures, flash pictures, decent low-light pictures w/o flash, etc. If you can only pick between these 3, the SD850IS is the best. You're really paying for Sony's touchscreen and resolution (N2) and aesthetics (W55).
reply to this comment
The W55 is a lower resolution than the N2, so expect to take faster pictures (not much faster, though!) The W55 is rated at about 1.1fps for only 4 pictures. To me, that's horrible. With flash and not using continuous (ie, autofocus each shot), you're probably looking at 3 seconds per picture with flash on.
The SD850IS is the best of the 3, clocking in at around 1.3fps. This isn't that great, honestly (a lot of ultracompacts can hit 2.1-2.3fps). But this camera does 1.3fps for an unlimited amount of shots, which is unusual. For a few pictures, you'll see this number improve, especially without flash. And if you use an SDHC card with fast transfer, you should get even better improvement. And you don't need a proprietary Sony Pro card that costs twice the price.
The SD850IS is a great camera for all purposes: video, good-light pictures, flash pictures, decent low-light pictures w/o flash, etc. If you can only pick between these 3, the SD850IS is the best. You're really paying for Sony's touchscreen and resolution (N2) and aesthetics (W55).
mlarson (09/18/2007)
Thank you for this remarkably thorough response! Woud you please comment on your statement that there are a lot of ultracompacts that prepare for shots much faster? Which are these? Any suggestions? Close-up shots (primarily of small, rehabilitating squirrels) is essential. Thanks again!
reply to this comment
Matt (09/19/2007)
All my answers are getting cut off... annoying.
Here are a few cameras that have good shot-to-shot time, either with just normal pictures or during continuous shooting. For your requirement, continuous shooting should be fine, since your subjects stay in the same general area (ie, you don't have to go hunting them down and autofocus every time because their distances are changing).
SD800IS: 1.7fps
A570IS: 1.7fps
SD900: 2.1fps (expensive, though, with a lot of MP)
FX30: up to 3fps (max of 5 pictures before you have to wait for them to be uploaded onto the memory card)
TZ3: up to 3fps (same as above); great camera, especially for the price (although still ~$300)
If you want to read up on any of the cameras a little more, check out www.dpreview.com for more performance information, and amazon.com for approximate prices.
reply to this comment
Here are a few cameras that have good shot-to-shot time, either with just normal pictures or during continuous shooting. For your requirement, continuous shooting should be fine, since your subjects stay in the same general area (ie, you don't have to go hunting them down and autofocus every time because their distances are changing).
SD800IS: 1.7fps
A570IS: 1.7fps
SD900: 2.1fps (expensive, though, with a lot of MP)
FX30: up to 3fps (max of 5 pictures before you have to wait for them to be uploaded onto the memory card)
TZ3: up to 3fps (same as above); great camera, especially for the price (although still ~$300)
If you want to read up on any of the cameras a little more, check out www.dpreview.com for more performance information, and amazon.com for approximate prices.
what is the most popular color camera (wilmama — 09/05/2007)
reply to this comment
Matt (09/06/2007)
Popular to whom? Color of body, or color in its pictures? There aren't too many cameras out there that have flashy colors (pretty much Casio and Sony, who sacrifice picture quality for style more often than not, IMO). On this site you can look at not only the most popular cameras, but the best cameras in each price range, camera type, brand, etc. Just use the column at the left to find what you're looking for.
reply to this comment
j. armijo (09/09/2007)
I vote black . All mine are black. Is black a color ?
reply to this comment
I purchased N2 but to be frank I am not satisfied. . ? (kkdpk — 08/09/2007)
I was looking for a camera that requires minimum user settings with good picture quality, I purchased N2 but to be frank I am not satisfied.
I have taken almost 200 indoor & outdoor shots with this camera but I am only satisfied with a few number of Pics.
The camera is giving some dark skin tones specially if I shoot indoor pics in Auto mode, & in some photos the focus is out, may be I am unable to make proper settings.
Do I need to change it with T100 or W200, or plz guide me with the proper settings.
Regards,
Dr. Kantesh
+92-300-3410070.
reply to this comment
I have taken almost 200 indoor & outdoor shots with this camera but I am only satisfied with a few number of Pics.
The camera is giving some dark skin tones specially if I shoot indoor pics in Auto mode, & in some photos the focus is out, may be I am unable to make proper settings.
Do I need to change it with T100 or W200, or plz guide me with the proper settings.
Regards,
Dr. Kantesh
+92-300-3410070.
Matt (08/09/2007)
Well, if you have to stick with the Sony brand-name, get the T100. You do not need the 12MP in an ultracompact to take the kind of pictures an ultracompact takes.
If you can switch brands, consider the Canon SD750 if you don't care about image stabilization, the Canon SD850IS if you do, and the Canon SD800IS for wide-angle and image stabilization.
reply to this comment
If you can switch brands, consider the Canon SD750 if you don't care about image stabilization, the Canon SD850IS if you do, and the Canon SD800IS for wide-angle and image stabilization.
Matt (08/17/2007)
May we close on this question, Dr. Kantesh, or can we help you further?
reply to this comment
kkdpk (08/18/2007)
Mr. Matt thanks for your help.
But can you clarify, what benefits I'll get if I switch to T100. I've heard it has a weak flash.....Does it really matters?
reply to this comment
But can you clarify, what benefits I'll get if I switch to T100. I've heard it has a weak flash.....Does it really matters?
Matt (08/20/2007)
The T100 has a little better flash than the N2. Will it matter? Not really. Will another ultracompact give you a much better flash that you'll notice? Probably not.
If you notice, the max resolution of the N2 and T100 are identical. What that means, essentially, is they are both the same effective megapixel. The sensor size is also different (1/2.5" for the T100, 1/1.7" for the N2). The T100 also has an ISO3200 rating (which you'll never use, anyway; but the picture quality on the same ISO will be better for the T100). The T100 has more zoom, ranging from 35mm-175mm; the N2 only has 36mm-114mm.
Another big perk for the T100 is image stabilization, which the N2 doesn't have. And macro-focus: The T100 can focus from 1cm, the N2 only from 6cm. The T100 also has HD video out (accessories required, I believe); the N2 doesn't have this option.
The T100 is also a hair smaller than the N2.
I hope that helps!
reply to this comment
If you notice, the max resolution of the N2 and T100 are identical. What that means, essentially, is they are both the same effective megapixel. The sensor size is also different (1/2.5" for the T100, 1/1.7" for the N2). The T100 also has an ISO3200 rating (which you'll never use, anyway; but the picture quality on the same ISO will be better for the T100). The T100 has more zoom, ranging from 35mm-175mm; the N2 only has 36mm-114mm.
Another big perk for the T100 is image stabilization, which the N2 doesn't have. And macro-focus: The T100 can focus from 1cm, the N2 only from 6cm. The T100 also has HD video out (accessories required, I believe); the N2 doesn't have this option.
The T100 is also a hair smaller than the N2.
I hope that helps!
Any thoughts on why I'm getting sound feedback on my mpeg files taken with the N2 in video mode? It's almost as if the microphone is too sensitive. (MisaHH — 08/08/2007)
The feedback sounds like someone is playing Missile Command on an Atari 2600 in the background! It still records regular sounds but during the "quiet" moments in the recordings the feedback gets rather loud. If it is the microphone being overly sensitive to compensate, is there a way to adjust this? Thanks for the help in advance.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (08/10/2007)
Cameras come with noise delimiters that are designed to prevent the audio from being "blown out" when video taping. In those quiet moments, the delimiter may be over compensating in an effort to pick up the sound. If you don't get feedback when there isn't quiet moments, I'd chalk it up to a rather narrow design of the delimiter itself. I don't think you'll be able to adjust this. It's a digital still camera first and foremost and not a video camera. As such, the video is more a marketing feature than an actual adjustable video function.
reply to this comment
what does the n2 look like on the back of the camera? (bmason4753 — 08/07/2007)
is there also a smaller viewing screen as in the N1 Is this touchscreen interface a problem?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (08/07/2007)
The back is dominated by it's large lcd touchscreen. A nice feature it has is that Sony includes a strap attached stylus so you don't have to touch the screen with your fingers at all. This helps to minmize skin oil getting on the lcd.
reply to this comment
bukit97 (08/07/2007)
Probably what N2 looks like on the back of the camera is best shown in the video clip :
Sony Cybershot DSC N2 video tour
You can log on to <a href="unbeatable.co.uk/videoblogs... site</a> to watch the video clip which shows the camera back very well.
There is no viewfinder and the touch screen does not appear to draw much criticisms from users except for a comment that the LCD display may need a protecter.
reply to this comment
Sony Cybershot DSC N2 video tour
You can log on to <a href="unbeatable.co.uk/videoblogs... site</a> to watch the video clip which shows the camera back very well.
There is no viewfinder and the touch screen does not appear to draw much criticisms from users except for a comment that the LCD display may need a protecter.
by James DeRuvo (08/08/2007)
Nice find, bukit! Protectors for screens are an easy add on. You can purchase them at any camera store/department. They're a good idea, just don't submit to the temptation of pressing harder thinking you have to.
reply to this comment
Josh Vine (08/29/2007)
you can get a pretty good view of the N2 at steve's digicams where you can see a 360° interactive movie. By clicking and dragging you can see the camera from 360° around. below is the link.
steves-digicams.com/2007_re...
reply to this comment
steves-digicams.com/2007_re...
by James DeRuvo (08/30/2007)
Another nice find. Well done, Josh! I'm bookmarking Steve's.
reply to this comment
Can i get this model in INDIA? (pingaagumbe — 08/03/2007)
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (08/03/2007)
I found it on the Sony India Website ( sony.co.in/product/dsc-n2?s... ).
reply to this comment
Which one is better Sony T100 or N2? Very Confused! (kkdpk — 06/24/2007)
I'm going to buy my 2nd Digi Cam and I don't want to change it again. I want a camera that can shoot in every mode like low light, fast moving objects and can give sharp clear print outs.
reply to this comment
OxenWay (07/06/2007)
skipping the large zoom of the T100, and the non mechanical moving lens which mostly considered safer than others..I'll respond to your main interests..
I want a camera that :
1."can shoot in low light"...i'd recommend the T100 because it has the ISO 3200 ability.
2."fast moving objects"...Go for the N2 due to faster shutter speed.
3."sharp clear print outs"...definitely the N2 due to the high 10 megapixel outstanding resolution.
reply to this comment
I want a camera that :
1."can shoot in low light"...i'd recommend the T100 because it has the ISO 3200 ability.
2."fast moving objects"...Go for the N2 due to faster shutter speed.
3."sharp clear print outs"...definitely the N2 due to the high 10 megapixel outstanding resolution.
kkdpk (07/22/2007)
Dear Oxen thanks for your reply. I purchased N2 after reading your suggestion....but to be frank I am not satisfied.
I have taken almost 200 indoor & outdoor shots with this camera but I am only satisfied with a few number of Pics.
The camera is giving some dark skin tones specially if I shoot in Auto mode, & in some photos the focus is out, may be I am unable to make proper settings.
Do I need to change it with T100, or plz guide me with the proper settings.
I would be glad to receive your direct e-mails at kkdpk@yahoo.com
Regards,
Dr. Kantesh
+92-300-3410070.
reply to this comment
I have taken almost 200 indoor & outdoor shots with this camera but I am only satisfied with a few number of Pics.
The camera is giving some dark skin tones specially if I shoot in Auto mode, & in some photos the focus is out, may be I am unable to make proper settings.
Do I need to change it with T100, or plz guide me with the proper settings.
I would be glad to receive your direct e-mails at kkdpk@yahoo.com
Regards,
Dr. Kantesh
+92-300-3410070.
compare these: Sony N2 vs. Lumix DMC-TZ3...both have 3.0 LCD's, sony has 10 MP and touchscreen BUT 3X optical zoom vs. Lumix 7.2MP, no touchscreen,10X (camsfeir — 04/11/2007)
Same relative cost, but 10X optical zoom in Panasonic, using SD memory versus obligation to Sony memory stick, 3X optical zoom but love that touchscreen and 10 MP What's a fella to do?
reply to this comment
Seductive (04/12/2007)
If you are intertested in getting pictures from really far points then go ahead for the panasonic! but if your're looking 4 something odd, new and eay use and fun go for the Sony, as it's worth it!! i have one and im glad with it .. never used panasonic though, so i recommend u to ask Panasonic users as well =)
reply to this comment
Jan Meja Heir (04/15/2007)
Panasonic is overall a better camera with one small exception. The images are always noisy from them, higher ISO is really bad. Sony tends to have a bit smoother looking of an image, but overall I still prefer Panasonic. 10 MP in compact cameras is nothing more than marketing, you'd be better off if they put a 6 or 7 MP sensor...much cleaner image and better high ISO performance.
reply to this comment
Hi!! Can you tell me that does more pixels means more downloading time of pics on PC. In this case how much time would 1 pic of N2 take to transfer (schulz — 04/05/2007)
I want to buy N2 but this question is bothering me a bit
reply to this comment
mike (04/16/2007)
Yes you are right. The more pixels means larger file size for each photo and will take more time to download. Don't know specifics but if you have a decent computer with correct card ports it shouldn't be too much longer of a wait.
reply to this comment
revhead227 (05/02/2007)
more pixel and more the better picture for your memory hoilday or family or friends smileeeeeeee
worth wait under one min !! can you be patince ? we have to be patince for one min while download the best one!!!
the worst download waited are videoing bec it huge memory MB!! but worth it
most my download it take one half mins or less
when you plug camera cable to pc and you just go make a cup coffee or play pc around for min then there is !!!
great thanks
revhead227
reply to this comment
worth wait under one min !! can you be patince ? we have to be patince for one min while download the best one!!!
the worst download waited are videoing bec it huge memory MB!! but worth it
most my download it take one half mins or less
when you plug camera cable to pc and you just go make a cup coffee or play pc around for min then there is !!!
great thanks
revhead227
Which camera has better image quality, the Sony N2 or the Canon A640? (sureshmilton — 03/12/2007)
I was hoping to either buy the N2 or the Canon A 640. Even though my interest lies on the Sony N2, I can't deny the A640. Kindly give me details on which has better image quality overall
reply to this comment
Digiter (03/14/2007)
You'll find details here --- imaging-resource.com/
<... the left you'll see "Resources"; click on "Compare Sample Images" and enter the two cameras. See for yourself!
Personally, I prefer the A640 as it does not exchange noise for blur, to the extent that the N2 does.
reply to this comment
<... the left you'll see "Resources"; click on "Compare Sample Images" and enter the two cameras. See for yourself!
Personally, I prefer the A640 as it does not exchange noise for blur, to the extent that the N2 does.
Digiter (03/14/2007)
I should have said that I have not had the N2 "in hand" - but the A640 I use and it is a great little camera.
reply to this comment
Are there any issues with the fact that there is no view finder on the N2? (sweetyncl — 03/07/2007)
Does not having a view finder create problems when taking being in sunny areas? Is the touchscreen hard to see in this situation?
reply to this comment
bukit97 (03/07/2007)
If you have a chance to look at Steves Digicam review on Sony N2, two points are worth noting in connection with your question :
a. the statement about the LCD display :
" This is a hybrid display for use in any lighting conditions. Sony's "Clear Photo LCD" technology provides higher resolution, contrast ratio and brightness as well as a wider viewing angle. "
b. the photograph of the camera taking the picture of a girl under the sun, and the picture on the LCD is fantastically clear, not badly affected by the sunlight in any way.
Other reviews that I checked through does not touch on this point, indicating it is not a serious problem.
So if you plan to buy an N2, you may ask for permission to test it in the sunny areas to confirm what the review says, but don't let this worry stop you from buying what you like.
reply to this comment
a. the statement about the LCD display :
" This is a hybrid display for use in any lighting conditions. Sony's "Clear Photo LCD" technology provides higher resolution, contrast ratio and brightness as well as a wider viewing angle. "
b. the photograph of the camera taking the picture of a girl under the sun, and the picture on the LCD is fantastically clear, not badly affected by the sunlight in any way.
Other reviews that I checked through does not touch on this point, indicating it is not a serious problem.
So if you plan to buy an N2, you may ask for permission to test it in the sunny areas to confirm what the review says, but don't let this worry stop you from buying what you like.
What is your feeling about Samsung Nv3 or one of the SVP line? (GD2007 — 03/04/2007)
SVP XTHINN 12ZXG ?
What is a good +6MP ultracompact?
reply to this comment
What is a good +6MP ultracompact?
Ben Keough (03/05/2007)
Hi GD,
First of all, I'd recommend staying far, far away from SVP's products. If you'd never heard of them before you started looking at cameras, that's because their cameras are cheap knockoffs that no major sites/retailers carry and no major review sites would consider reviewing. You'd be much better off saving your money and buying something from a known brand name.
...which is not to say that every model from the big names is a winner.
The NV3 is a very nice camera. It has superior build quality (feels "like it was carved from a block of metal," as one review put it), takes very good shots, and has lots of extra features like mp3 and video capability, and can view text files as well. It has a huge, sharp LCD screen and a handy anti-shake feature (which does slow down shot-to-shot time quite a bit, unfortunately).
Other 6MP+ ultracompacts you might want to consider:
Canon SD800 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )
Panasonic FX01 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )
Sony N2 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )
Hope this helps!
reply to this comment
First of all, I'd recommend staying far, far away from SVP's products. If you'd never heard of them before you started looking at cameras, that's because their cameras are cheap knockoffs that no major sites/retailers carry and no major review sites would consider reviewing. You'd be much better off saving your money and buying something from a known brand name.
...which is not to say that every model from the big names is a winner.
The NV3 is a very nice camera. It has superior build quality (feels "like it was carved from a block of metal," as one review put it), takes very good shots, and has lots of extra features like mp3 and video capability, and can view text files as well. It has a huge, sharp LCD screen and a handy anti-shake feature (which does slow down shot-to-shot time quite a bit, unfortunately).
Other 6MP+ ultracompacts you might want to consider:
Canon SD800 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )
Panasonic FX01 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )
Sony N2 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )
Hope this helps!
How many shots can be held on a 1GB Memory Stick on the N2? (Marge — 02/26/2007)
reply to this comment
Rich Watson (02/26/2007)
I can tell you how many can be held on a Canon A710, which has a 7.1MP maximum photo size. The number of photos depends on much you compress the photos for storage:
minimal compression 312
medium compression 502
maximum compression 1040
Since the N2 has 10.1MP, it would hold 70% of these totals. I think it's pretty safe to assume that the storage algorithms yield similar results on the two cameras. Therefore the 1GB memory stick should hold between 218 and 728 photos, shot at the full 10.1MP resolution.
reply to this comment
minimal compression 312
medium compression 502
maximum compression 1040
Since the N2 has 10.1MP, it would hold 70% of these totals. I think it's pretty safe to assume that the storage algorithms yield similar results on the two cameras. Therefore the 1GB memory stick should hold between 218 and 728 photos, shot at the full 10.1MP resolution.
Ardi Ounapuu (02/26/2007)
Hi Marge,
It all depends on your camera settings. If you shoot using maximum resolution then it can fit probably around 200 pictures.
reply to this comment
It all depends on your camera settings. If you shoot using maximum resolution then it can fit probably around 200 pictures.
Marge (02/27/2007)
Thank you for your help - much appreciated. Think I might buy another memory stick in the future (see how it goes) take loads of photos on holiday!
Thanks agan
reply to this comment
Thanks agan
Matt (05/02/2007)
I believe movies at 30fps at 640x480 eat about 1.7MB/s, or 1GB for 10 minutes!
For highest resolution pictures, about 5MB per picture, or 200 pictures at minimal compression.
reply to this comment
For highest resolution pictures, about 5MB per picture, or 200 pictures at minimal compression.
Blurred images in evening or night time, when sunlight is very good. (pmishra — 02/25/2007)
I always heard an issue about Sony Digital camera's that they are not as effective in the evening (when natural light is not very good) as they are when in the sunshine, even with flash. Does the Sony Cybershot N2 fulfills this need. otherwise there is no matching of Sony digital camera's in day time images.
reply to this comment
bukit97 (02/25/2007)
Lately when I tried to do a search for users' opinion on Nikon dSLRs vs Canon dSLRs, I came across a feedback that says apart from a good camera, user's skill play an important role in producing good photos.
The same probably is true here, where some people can get good flash pictures in low lights with Sony cameras while some cannot do it so well.
Generally it is true that good camera is the basic requirement, but at the end of the day, skills, optimum settings and patience etc all add in to make a picture a success. While it takes great photographers to produce great pictures, it doesn't stop anybody from getting a good flash photo with Sony Cybershot N2.
reply to this comment
The same probably is true here, where some people can get good flash pictures in low lights with Sony cameras while some cannot do it so well.
Generally it is true that good camera is the basic requirement, but at the end of the day, skills, optimum settings and patience etc all add in to make a picture a success. While it takes great photographers to produce great pictures, it doesn't stop anybody from getting a good flash photo with Sony Cybershot N2.
bukit97 (02/25/2007)
There is a very good review of Sony N2 with examples of photographs taken under various conditions, including the use of flash lights.
You may wish to take a look at the explanations and test images at
imaging-resource.com/PRODS/...
reply to this comment
You may wish to take a look at the explanations and test images at
imaging-resource.com/PRODS/...
Any good camera with a 3inch screne (JB13 — 02/21/2007)
I am looking for a digital camera with a large back screen also I heard Sony has one with a touch screen I dont know what model that is
reply to this comment
Ben Keough (02/21/2007)
Hi Jodi,
The Sony cameras you're thinking of are the N1 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) and N2 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), both of which have 3.0" touch screen LCDs. They're both very good cameras, particularly as "party cameras" (i.e., they're small and ultraportable, and take very good, well-exposed night shots with flash). I'd recommend them highly if that's the sort of camera you're looking for. Particularly the N2.
Hope this helps!
reply to this comment
The Sony cameras you're thinking of are the N1 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) and N2 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), both of which have 3.0" touch screen LCDs. They're both very good cameras, particularly as "party cameras" (i.e., they're small and ultraportable, and take very good, well-exposed night shots with flash). I'd recommend them highly if that's the sort of camera you're looking for. Particularly the N2.
Hope this helps!
i m abt to buy the sony product but i m confused about sony DSCN1 and DSCN2 so vich product should i buy (nastynihar — 02/19/2007)
my requirements are
as soon as i click it should not wait for secs and click d image immediately (must)
battery standby time (must)
good zoom
quality picture
and it should be best than all the cameras.....
reply to this comment
as soon as i click it should not wait for secs and click d image immediately (must)
battery standby time (must)
good zoom
quality picture
and it should be best than all the cameras.....
bukit97 (02/22/2007)
Between N1 and N2, DSC N2 best suit the list of requirement stated by you.
b. The features of N2 are impressive :
10.10 megapixel sensor.
3648x2736 maximum resolution
1/1.7 sensor size
38 - 114 mm zoom
6cm Macro focus range
ISO ratings from 100 to 1600
Minimum aperture,wide : f2.8
Maximum aperture, wide : f8.0
Maximum shutter speed : 1/2000
Maximum video resolution : 640x480
Frames per second : 30 fps
Voice recording : Yes
LCD size : 3"
LCD resolution : 230,000 pixels
USB : 2.0 Hi-speed
weight : 185g.
c. Timings :
Start to first shot : 1.6 seconds
Focusing time : 0.1-0.3 seconds
Shutter lag : not noticeable
d. Picture Quality :
Picture quality is very good, but as the author says, "do not take our words for it". There is a gallery where you can see the pictures and judge for yourself.
The website is
dcresource.com/reviews/sony...
reply to this comment
b. The features of N2 are impressive :
10.10 megapixel sensor.
3648x2736 maximum resolution
1/1.7 sensor size
38 - 114 mm zoom
6cm Macro focus range
ISO ratings from 100 to 1600
Minimum aperture,wide : f2.8
Maximum aperture, wide : f8.0
Maximum shutter speed : 1/2000
Maximum video resolution : 640x480
Frames per second : 30 fps
Voice recording : Yes
LCD size : 3"
LCD resolution : 230,000 pixels
USB : 2.0 Hi-speed
weight : 185g.
c. Timings :
Start to first shot : 1.6 seconds
Focusing time : 0.1-0.3 seconds
Shutter lag : not noticeable
d. Picture Quality :
Picture quality is very good, but as the author says, "do not take our words for it". There is a gallery where you can see the pictures and judge for yourself.
The website is
dcresource.com/reviews/sony...
Can pictures be retrieved from the camera itself via USB? (ripsta7s — 02/10/2007)
Or do I need a seperate USB reader to access the storage card?
reply to this comment
bukit97 (02/10/2007)
Using a USB card reader is the better solution because most of the software are primarily designed to retrieve pictures from a storage drive.
USB card reader has the added advantage that it does not need external power source. Just plug in to the USB port and it is instantaneously recognised by Windows 2000 and Windows XP.
reply to this comment
USB card reader has the added advantage that it does not need external power source. Just plug in to the USB port and it is instantaneously recognised by Windows 2000 and Windows XP.
ripsta7s (02/10/2007)
But is it possible to simply plug in the cable from the camera itself and transfer pictures?
reply to this comment
bukit97 (02/11/2007)
It is possible to plug in the camera to the computer using a USB cable. This you do by pre-installing the software that comes together with the camera and you need an AC Adaptor at hand to provide the extra power required.
There is also additional steps to ensure that the computer recognize the camera.
All considered, I would use the card reader solution, especially when the card readers are selling at around $10 a piece and you can plug in to any computer without having to go through the process mentioned above for each and everyone of them that you want to transfer pictures to.
reply to this comment
There is also additional steps to ensure that the computer recognize the camera.
All considered, I would use the card reader solution, especially when the card readers are selling at around $10 a piece and you can plug in to any computer without having to go through the process mentioned above for each and everyone of them that you want to transfer pictures to.
ripsta7s (02/11/2007)
Got it, thanks!
reply to this comment
Is there a specific printer that would be adequate with the Sony N2 camera for photo printing (dag3013 — 02/01/2007)
Compatible printer for the sony N2
reply to this comment
Ben Keough (02/01/2007)
Hi David,
Cameras aren't really paired with specific printers, except in the case of systems like Kodak's printer docks. You ought to be able to make great prints from your Sony on just about any brand of photo printer.
Personally, I've had the best luck with Epson and Canon printers--they seem to provide the most lifelike color and crisp photo reproduction--though others will probably suggest HP or some other brand. And, of course, each model differs in quality. You'll need to do some serious research into which model is best for you. Do you want a pure photo printing solution? Do you want a multifunction megaprinter (scanner, copier, text and photo printing)? Do you need an LCD display? And so on and so on.
But the long and the short of it is that you can print photos from your N2 on any printer.
Good luck!
reply to this comment
Cameras aren't really paired with specific printers, except in the case of systems like Kodak's printer docks. You ought to be able to make great prints from your Sony on just about any brand of photo printer.
Personally, I've had the best luck with Epson and Canon printers--they seem to provide the most lifelike color and crisp photo reproduction--though others will probably suggest HP or some other brand. And, of course, each model differs in quality. You'll need to do some serious research into which model is best for you. Do you want a pure photo printing solution? Do you want a multifunction megaprinter (scanner, copier, text and photo printing)? Do you need an LCD display? And so on and so on.
But the long and the short of it is that you can print photos from your N2 on any printer.
Good luck!
i own and love Sony DSCF707, Iwant a more compact camera, which one would you recommend? (Snaponlifer — 01/21/2007)
I am used to the Sony format and have tried out Other small camera's at best buy and thought that I would like another Sony but have heard horror stories about red eye and white marks. My DSCF707 takes professional quality photos. Can I get close to the smae quality with a smaller camera?
reply to this comment
Ben Keough (01/22/2007)
Hi Sheryl,
Have you considered the H5 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )? It's smaller than the F707 (but not exactly small) and very, very powerful. It's a 7MP, 12x optical zoom (with a nice image stabilization system), and has a beautiful 3" LCD.
If you want a very small camera, you might want to consider the N2 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) (10MP, 3x optical zoom, no image stabilization, very small, limited manual settings) or the W100 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) (8MP, 3x optical zoom, no image stabilization, full manual mode).
These are all good cameras. I'd try them out in-hand and see which feels best to you.
Hope this helps!
reply to this comment
Have you considered the H5 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )? It's smaller than the F707 (but not exactly small) and very, very powerful. It's a 7MP, 12x optical zoom (with a nice image stabilization system), and has a beautiful 3" LCD.
If you want a very small camera, you might want to consider the N2 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) (10MP, 3x optical zoom, no image stabilization, very small, limited manual settings) or the W100 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) (8MP, 3x optical zoom, no image stabilization, full manual mode).
These are all good cameras. I'd try them out in-hand and see which feels best to you.
Hope this helps!
why the n2 more cheap than the n1 if the n2 have 10 megapixel? (liran555 — 01/20/2007)
thanx!
reply to this comment
Rich Watson (01/20/2007)
The N2 is the replacement; the N1 is discontinued. If you find the N2 cheaper, by all means buy that one!!
reply to this comment
why the n2 more cheap than the n2 if the n2 have 10 megapixel? (liran555 — 01/20/2007)
i have to choose!!!!
reply to this comment
Rich Watson (01/20/2007)
The N2 replaced the N1. The N1 is discontinued. Any for sale are "old stock". If the N2 is cheaper, buy it!
reply to this comment
what is red eye reduction? (fasil25 — 01/17/2007)
I dont know about red eye key. please explain
reply to this comment
Ardi Ounapuu (01/17/2007)
Hello, Using flashlight while taking a picture of human face causes reflection that makes the eyes to look red on the picture. If the subject wears glasses or contact lenses then the effect may be not so much noticeable. Most of the cameras have so-called "red eye reduction" function. Using it helps to reduce the red color reflection effect and make the eyes to look more or less normal color. However, computer software is the only solution to completely eliminate red color from the eyes.
reply to this comment
Kevin Greggain (01/17/2007)
If you have ever seen a photo where the people in the frame look like they were just possessed by the devil, you will know what red-eye is.
Red-eye reduction is the function that will try to compensate for the problem by pre-flashing light before the actual flash fires. This makes the pupils shrink right before the actual flash to reduce this problem.
The other cause of red-eye is with the flash being very close to the lens. This means both the lens and the flash are pointing directly into the eye. Even with red-eye reduction you can still get red-eye if you are close to the subject.
Idealy, finding a camera that offers an off-camera flash option (as in a hot shoe based flash) is the best if you are finding this to be a common problem. Other options are to diffuse the flash (by putting something translucent in front of the flash to break up and soften the flash's light). This will spread the light out and it will not be as concentrated, but then you reduce the flash's reach in doing so. It's a toss-up..
External flash units are the best way to go.. In the older days, you might have seen a wedding photographer holding a big bracket with a flash mounted off to the side. This is for that exact problem.
reply to this comment
Red-eye reduction is the function that will try to compensate for the problem by pre-flashing light before the actual flash fires. This makes the pupils shrink right before the actual flash to reduce this problem.
The other cause of red-eye is with the flash being very close to the lens. This means both the lens and the flash are pointing directly into the eye. Even with red-eye reduction you can still get red-eye if you are close to the subject.
Idealy, finding a camera that offers an off-camera flash option (as in a hot shoe based flash) is the best if you are finding this to be a common problem. Other options are to diffuse the flash (by putting something translucent in front of the flash to break up and soften the flash's light). This will spread the light out and it will not be as concentrated, but then you reduce the flash's reach in doing so. It's a toss-up..
External flash units are the best way to go.. In the older days, you might have seen a wedding photographer holding a big bracket with a flash mounted off to the side. This is for that exact problem.
how can play the slide show on computer??????? (ryoosuf — 01/17/2007)
there is a slide show option on the camera. but it doesnt work @ computer.
reply to this comment
Joe (01/17/2007)
It is designed to work when you hook your camera up to your TV. For a slide show on a computer I would use iphoto or powerpoint.
reply to this comment
CrazyHarry (01/17/2007)
reply to this comment
Which is better; Canon ds900 or Sony N2? (jmartin78 — 01/15/2007)
Ease of use. Picture Quality. Better focus/zoom power.
reply to this comment
Ben Keough (01/16/2007)
Hi Jon,
These are very well-matched cameras, both in terms of stats and in terms of reputation. As you can see from their pages here on DCHQ, both cameras are pulling around a 4.5 out 5 score from user reviews. Both cameras feature 10MP sensors, and both include 3x optical zooms.
Each camera has slight edges over the other. The N2 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) has a beautiful 3" touchscreen LCD, though it's the same resolution (230,000 pixels) as the SD900 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )'s 2.5" non-touchscreen LCD. The SD900 has a better continuous shooting mode (2.1 frames per second compared to the N2's 0.8fps). The N2 uses Sony's proprietary memory stick storage format, and memory sticks are often more expensive than the SecureDigital cards that the SD900 uses. The N2 is lighter and smaller than the SD900, particularly in its thickness. Finally, the SD900 includes Canon's much-ballyhooed "face detection" technology, which actually allows you to maintain focus on your subject's face, even as they move.
My personal preference is for the SD900, but having used the N2's predecessor (the N1) I can say that the Sony is also a fine camera, and might even fare a little better than the Canon in low light/party situations.
Hope this helps!
reply to this comment
These are very well-matched cameras, both in terms of stats and in terms of reputation. As you can see from their pages here on DCHQ, both cameras are pulling around a 4.5 out 5 score from user reviews. Both cameras feature 10MP sensors, and both include 3x optical zooms.
Each camera has slight edges over the other. The N2 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) has a beautiful 3" touchscreen LCD, though it's the same resolution (230,000 pixels) as the SD900 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )'s 2.5" non-touchscreen LCD. The SD900 has a better continuous shooting mode (2.1 frames per second compared to the N2's 0.8fps). The N2 uses Sony's proprietary memory stick storage format, and memory sticks are often more expensive than the SecureDigital cards that the SD900 uses. The N2 is lighter and smaller than the SD900, particularly in its thickness. Finally, the SD900 includes Canon's much-ballyhooed "face detection" technology, which actually allows you to maintain focus on your subject's face, even as they move.
My personal preference is for the SD900, but having used the N2's predecessor (the N1) I can say that the Sony is also a fine camera, and might even fare a little better than the Canon in low light/party situations.
Hope this helps!
jmartin78 (01/16/2007)
Ben, thanks for your reply. The information that you shared will definitely help me in my choice of camera. Thanks again and have a great day.
reply to this comment
jmartin78 (01/17/2007)
So, Including the above and every other ultra compact, which is the best on the market?
reply to this comment
Steve (01/25/2007)
Im looking to buy either the N2 or SD900 as well, I heard that the N2 has has a lot of picture noise higher ISO settings...does this mean that its not a good camera to take pictures in the dark or low light??? Any answers will greatly help! I'm looking for a digital camera to use in nightclub up close enviroment, want crisp pictures and true color.
reply to this comment
Ben Keough (01/25/2007)
Steve and Jon,
These two cameras are pretty much tops in the ultracompact market. You might also consider the Canon SD800 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), which has an optical image stabilization system that will get rid of a lot of low-light blur and save a lot of pictures.
My vote is still for the SD900, but you should consider the other two/try them in-hand at an electronics store.
Good luck!
reply to this comment
These two cameras are pretty much tops in the ultracompact market. You might also consider the Canon SD800 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), which has an optical image stabilization system that will get rid of a lot of low-light blur and save a lot of pictures.
My vote is still for the SD900, but you should consider the other two/try them in-hand at an electronics store.
Good luck!
Can you please suggest between W100 and N2 which one should i go for. (bhavinim — 01/07/2007)
Price is not a consideration.
reply to this comment
Andrew Skinner (01/07/2007)
Bhavini,
Although I have heard some troubling things about the touch screen, I would still pick the Sony N2 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) (between those two cameras alone). My choice is based on the 10 megapixel resolution (great for large prints), the image stabilization function (good for low light situations), the ISO 1600 capability (also good for low light situations), and the manual exposure capabilities (for more versatile, artistic shots). Its worth the extra $100 to me. Good luck.
Andrew
reply to this comment
Although I have heard some troubling things about the touch screen, I would still pick the Sony N2 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) (between those two cameras alone). My choice is based on the 10 megapixel resolution (great for large prints), the image stabilization function (good for low light situations), the ISO 1600 capability (also good for low light situations), and the manual exposure capabilities (for more versatile, artistic shots). Its worth the extra $100 to me. Good luck.
Andrew
Brenda Paro (01/08/2007)
My advice is to try and get a chance to handle both cameras. I agree with what Andrew said in terms of image quality, the N2 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) really is fantastic. However, part of why it's more expensive is the touch screen- and the touch screen is a love/ hate thing with photographers. You will either love it or be frustrated beyond belief. The screen has a tendency to get dirty/ fingerprinted often, and when you pull up a menu, it appears as a translucent overlay over the image you are examining, and many people have issues with this.
Personally I love touch screens, they are very quick to navigate and I think they're nifty. But my advice is, if you haven't used one before, try it out before you buy the N2. It will make or break the decision.
reply to this comment
Personally I love touch screens, they are very quick to navigate and I think they're nifty. But my advice is, if you haven't used one before, try it out before you buy the N2. It will make or break the decision.
What are the problems with the Sony N2 (yadrofwarc — 01/03/2007)
Why isn't the Sony N2 camera rated in the top 5
reply to this comment
Joe (01/04/2007)
This site doesn't rate cameras to that specific degree (aka no top ten best cameras) mainly because there would be so many ties and some camera are good for some types of photography and not good for other types of photography. The <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... N2</a> is an excellent camera and it has one of the highest ratings on the site of a 4.5 out of 5. There is nothing wrong with it. In fact if you sort by rating it is the number 2 rated Sony camera on the site. Check out the user reviews too, they are very high.
If I had a top five compact digital cameras I would put the Sony N2 in it!
Good Luck!
reply to this comment
If I had a top five compact digital cameras I would put the Sony N2 in it!
Good Luck!
Brenda Paro (01/04/2007)
Every camera has its good and bad, and most issues are really depending on the photographer's tastes. Joe already explained the rating process, but in terms of problems w/ this particular camera I will mention that the only ones I've heard are that the touch screen needs to be cleaned constantly (an issue with any touch screen camera) and that it's a little noisy at high ISOs.
reply to this comment
yadrofwarc (01/25/2007)
Thanks Joe, Brenda seems to have provided additional information. She identifed information to keep in mind before I make a N2 purchase. The touch screen issues are already posted on a few camera review sites. The ISO noise is something else to consider beside it's price tag.
Also, might consider a Nikon if they come out with 10mp, 3" LCD screen.
reply to this comment
Also, might consider a Nikon if they come out with 10mp, 3" LCD screen.
Has Sony N2 many problem with red eye? (okprox — 01/01/2007)
too many different camera, i have seen one of camera i like it (Sony N2)
reply to this comment
Joe (01/03/2007)
The Sony N2 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) has red eye reduction which does a decent job of removing red eye. No camera has really perfected this and I find that it takes a lot of practice to find the best lighting situations to have red eye reduction work. But Sony is real good at it so this is a good choice.
Good Luck!
reply to this comment
Good Luck!
1 more question which would you prefer the N2 for a few more dollars or the W70? Thank you (BushViper65 — 12/18/2006)
For larger photos
reply to this comment
Ben Keough (12/18/2006)
Hi Donald,
In general the N2 is a bit better loved by users and pro reviewers, but they're both solid cameras and comparable in a lot of respects. If you've got the money, go for the N2 (better screen, more megapixels on a larger sensor, etc etc), but if you don't the W70 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is still a fine camera. Good luck!
reply to this comment
In general the N2 is a bit better loved by users and pro reviewers, but they're both solid cameras and comparable in a lot of respects. If you've got the money, go for the N2 (better screen, more megapixels on a larger sensor, etc etc), but if you don't the W70 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is still a fine camera. Good luck!
BushViper65 (12/19/2006)
Thank you Ben for your help!
reply to this comment
tareq (11/06/2007)
hi,
i prefer to buy the N2 but have a problem to buy it.bacause i live in bangladesh.how can i recive the N2 model with payment (price + delivery cost).can i recive it from bangladesh?pls give me ans in my mail.thank you.
bye.tareq
reply to this comment
i prefer to buy the N2 but have a problem to buy it.bacause i live in bangladesh.how can i recive the N2 model with payment (price + delivery cost).can i recive it from bangladesh?pls give me ans in my mail.thank you.
bye.tareq
How is the quality of enlarged pictures with the N2? (BushViper65 — 12/18/2006)
How large of a picture can you blow up with this camera Sony DSC N2 with out noticeable distortion?
reply to this comment
Brenda Paro (12/18/2006)
It's not distortion you need to worry about as much as it is graininess in the photo- when you blow up a photo, especially one without many megapixels, you enlarge the grain and sometimes you can see the "image noise" on large-sized prints. The N2 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) has 10.1 megapixels and a decent image sensor as well; you should not have problems blowing up photos just about as big you as please. Consumer cameras for the average user don't come with many more megapixels than this one.
Of course, the size of print you can make is proportionate to the amount of enlarging you do. For example, if you take a photo and then crop out all the sides and blow up the image in the middle, you won't be able to print it as large as an uncropped photo without getting grainy. It is also affected by the light- a photo taken in dark conditions will be grainier and more difficult to enlarge cleanly than one taken on a sunny day.
But unless you're planning on gigantic poster-sized prints and tons of cropping, you should not have any printing problems with the N2.
reply to this comment
Of course, the size of print you can make is proportionate to the amount of enlarging you do. For example, if you take a photo and then crop out all the sides and blow up the image in the middle, you won't be able to print it as large as an uncropped photo without getting grainy. It is also affected by the light- a photo taken in dark conditions will be grainier and more difficult to enlarge cleanly than one taken on a sunny day.
But unless you're planning on gigantic poster-sized prints and tons of cropping, you should not have any printing problems with the N2.
BushViper65 (12/18/2006)
Thank you for your quick response
reply to this comment
Which camera is best (or what feature do I need) for taking pictures instantly ie.capture kid's expressions,etc? I don't want such a delay. (PaulaOsowski — 12/17/2006)
I have a Sony Cybershot from about 2-3 years ago and it seems I always miss my kids' priceless expressions because of the several second delay between pushing the button and the image being captured. Also, it seems that the flash is weak and indoor pics never turn out that great.
reply to this comment
Andrew Skinner (12/17/2006)
Paula,
You might not need to buy a new camera. If you hold the shutter down half way to lock the settings in, you can capture photos faster. Also, most flashes are only effective up to 10 or 15 feet. Anything past that won't come out. What camera are you working with now?
Andrew
reply to this comment
You might not need to buy a new camera. If you hold the shutter down half way to lock the settings in, you can capture photos faster. Also, most flashes are only effective up to 10 or 15 feet. Anything past that won't come out. What camera are you working with now?
Andrew
PaulaOsowski (12/18/2006)
Andrew,
Thanks for your quick reply. I have the SonyCybershot DSC-P10. I always hold the shutter halfway down. It just seems to take so long to write the image to the memory stick and then a long lag before I'm able to take a second picture. I did some more reading on this website and saw the suggestions for various media that are "speedier". I am wondering if any of the newer cameras have improved on this (or maybe with the extra megapixels they are worse)?
Paula
reply to this comment
Thanks for your quick reply. I have the SonyCybershot DSC-P10. I always hold the shutter halfway down. It just seems to take so long to write the image to the memory stick and then a long lag before I'm able to take a second picture. I did some more reading on this website and saw the suggestions for various media that are "speedier". I am wondering if any of the newer cameras have improved on this (or maybe with the extra megapixels they are worse)?
Paula
Andrew Skinner (12/20/2006)
Paula,
If you get a "faster" memory card, this will definitely help. I try to purchase nothing but the faster cards, especially when shooting weddings. As technology advances, the write times of cameras and capabilities of the memory cards will improve. Because your camera is older, it does not have a high speed transfer function. If you want to stick with Sony ultra-compact cameras ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), the Sony N2 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is a 10.1 MP camera that supports the newer Memory Stick Pro DUO technology. The reviews on it are great too.
Andrew
reply to this comment
If you get a "faster" memory card, this will definitely help. I try to purchase nothing but the faster cards, especially when shooting weddings. As technology advances, the write times of cameras and capabilities of the memory cards will improve. Because your camera is older, it does not have a high speed transfer function. If you want to stick with Sony ultra-compact cameras ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), the Sony N2 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is a 10.1 MP camera that supports the newer Memory Stick Pro DUO technology. The reviews on it are great too.
Andrew
how could I transfer the images from the albums ? (ghiath — 12/11/2006)
I have N2 ,after I take alot of photos its become in albums ,I tried to transfer the image but its show me 6 photos inside the sony drive in the computer , why its make like that , why its not show me the whole images inside the camera?
reply to this comment
Ben Keough (12/11/2006)
Hi Ghiath,
If you try to view the camera's storage from within your computer operating system (I assume you're running Windows XP, but correct me if you're not), what do you see? When you open up My Computer, is it six pictures that you see or six folders? It seems likely that what's happening is your camera is creating several folders to hold the many photos, and that if you double-click on any of those six folders you'll see the various photographs. Try it and let me know. thanks!
reply to this comment
If you try to view the camera's storage from within your computer operating system (I assume you're running Windows XP, but correct me if you're not), what do you see? When you open up My Computer, is it six pictures that you see or six folders? It seems likely that what's happening is your camera is creating several folders to hold the many photos, and that if you double-click on any of those six folders you'll see the various photographs. Try it and let me know. thanks!
How is the digital shutter lag on this camera? Could you shoot fast action? (bimidji — 12/10/2006)
reply to this comment
Ben Keough (12/11/2006)
Hi Lexa,
You can see a full rundown of the CyberShot N2's timings here ( imaging-resource.com/PRODS/... ), but if you don't feel like reading through all the numbers... yes, it's a very quick camera and you can certainly shoot action with it. The longest it will take to focus and shoot is 0.69sec (at full zoom), and the shortest is 0.012sec (if you half-press the shutter button to pre-focus). Most shutter lag timings are around or under a quarter of a second.
Furthermore, the N2 has a burst mode (continuous shooting), though in comparison with similar cameras on the market it's sort of weak. In burst mode you can shoot three frames in succession at 0.7 frames per second. Burst mode can be a great way to capture action and make sure you get at least one great shot.
You should be aware, though, that ultracompact digital cameras like the N2 often have more issues with shooting action scenes than do their bigger, bulkier cousins. Don't expect miracles and you won't be disappointed.
Good luck!
reply to this comment
You can see a full rundown of the CyberShot N2's timings here ( imaging-resource.com/PRODS/... ), but if you don't feel like reading through all the numbers... yes, it's a very quick camera and you can certainly shoot action with it. The longest it will take to focus and shoot is 0.69sec (at full zoom), and the shortest is 0.012sec (if you half-press the shutter button to pre-focus). Most shutter lag timings are around or under a quarter of a second.
Furthermore, the N2 has a burst mode (continuous shooting), though in comparison with similar cameras on the market it's sort of weak. In burst mode you can shoot three frames in succession at 0.7 frames per second. Burst mode can be a great way to capture action and make sure you get at least one great shot.
You should be aware, though, that ultracompact digital cameras like the N2 often have more issues with shooting action scenes than do their bigger, bulkier cousins. Don't expect miracles and you won't be disappointed.
Good luck!
Looking for a camera that will catch sport shots at my kids sporting events. Is the sony cybershot N2 a winner? (dutch — 11/30/2006)
reply to this comment
Andrew Skinner (11/30/2006)
Darcy,
This camera should be just fine for outdoor sports shots. You might find the 3x optical zoom wanting though. Indoor shots won't be bad either with the higher ISO settings, as long as you don't need to use a flash. The effective range of the flash is approximately 0.6 to 15.7 feet. If you don't mind a larger camera, you can get an effective extended zoom ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) camera in the same price range. Something like the Sony H5 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) or the Sony S9000 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) would be great alternatives. Good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
reply to this comment
This camera should be just fine for outdoor sports shots. You might find the 3x optical zoom wanting though. Indoor shots won't be bad either with the higher ISO settings, as long as you don't need to use a flash. The effective range of the flash is approximately 0.6 to 15.7 feet. If you don't mind a larger camera, you can get an effective extended zoom ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) camera in the same price range. Something like the Sony H5 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) or the Sony S9000 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) would be great alternatives. Good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
does the touch screen have problems, what are they (herbiz — 11/29/2006)
reply to this comment
Brenda Paro (11/30/2006)
Yes, there can be issues depending on what you like. One user mentioned that she didn't like the touch screen because the menu buttons pop up over the image. They are translucent but they do appear on the LCD on top of your photo so that you can touch them to navigate, and they can interfere with actually looking at the photo. It can be sort of a pain to have to close the menu to inspect your photo, then open it again to do any sort of navigation.
Another issue mentioned was how the screen can collect fingerprints. Some people are more sensitive to this than others.
reply to this comment
Another issue mentioned was how the screen can collect fingerprints. Some people are more sensitive to this than others.
Is it possible to retrieve the pictures from the album in the camera once they have been deleted from the memory stick? (Echoes — 11/24/2006)
Someone deleted some pictures from my camera, I still have them on the album, and I'd like to get them on my computer somehow, even if they are at VGA resolution is this possible in anyway??? (recovering them from the stick won't be possible because other pics have been recorded over already)
reply to this comment
Ben Keough (11/24/2006)
Hi Echoes,
It may be possible to copy images from the album memory to the memory stick by accessing the record menu, then the setup menu, then copy. There may be an option there to copy files from the internal memory to the memory stick. Please check this and get back to me.
reply to this comment
It may be possible to copy images from the album memory to the memory stick by accessing the record menu, then the setup menu, then copy. There may be an option there to copy files from the internal memory to the memory stick. Please check this and get back to me.
Ben Keough (11/24/2006)
It might also be under Setup->Memory Stick->Copy.
reply to this comment
harry007 (11/26/2006)
It is possible to recover files deleted from memory stick. Below are two URL which you browse to download utilities to undo delete of the files. For undelete to work, one should stop using the memory stick of Delete is performed. Only unused portion of the memory stick storage can be recovered.
active-undelete.com/
luck.
Harry
reply to this comment
active-undelete.com/
Harry
Echoes (01/25/2007)
Actually none of this work, the memorystick had already been reused, so that wasn't an option, and I couldn't find an option in the camera menu to copy between the photo album to the stick, you can do it from pictures recorded in the internal memory, but not from the photo album, that seems to be separated, ayways thanks to all 3, and if you get any new ideas let me know.
reply to this comment
bukit97 (01/26/2007)
Actually the answer can be found in the Sony FAQs on the camera and I am copying and pasting the answer for you :
Article ID: 58715 (modified: 1/24/2007 8:03:00 PM)
Problem/Question:
Copy the images from the Album to a Memory Stick Duo.
Solution/Answer:
Yes, user can copy all the images in the Album to a Memory Stick Duo. Please follow the steps below:
1.
Insert a Memory Stick Duo with 32MB or larger remaining capacity.
2.
Press the on-screen key button to display the touch panel buttons.
* Skip this step when the mode switch is set to Playback/Edit.
3.
Touch MENU to display the menu.
4.
Touch Setup. (If it is not displayed, touch the upward/downward buttons to display it.)
5.
Touch the upward/downward buttons to display Memory Stick in the Setup screen.
6.
Touch Copy. The Copy options are displayed.
7.
Touch Album. The message "All data in Album will be copied Ready?" appears.
8.
Touch OK. Copying starts.
9.
Press the on-screen key button to exit the menu.
I understand the pictures saved in the Album is smaller. Well, I suppose something is better than nothing.
reply to this comment
Article ID: 58715 (modified: 1/24/2007 8:03:00 PM)
Problem/Question:
Copy the images from the Album to a Memory Stick Duo.
Solution/Answer:
Yes, user can copy all the images in the Album to a Memory Stick Duo. Please follow the steps below:
1.
Insert a Memory Stick Duo with 32MB or larger remaining capacity.
2.
Press the on-screen key button to display the touch panel buttons.
* Skip this step when the mode switch is set to Playback/Edit.
3.
Touch MENU to display the menu.
4.
Touch Setup. (If it is not displayed, touch the upward/downward buttons to display it.)
5.
Touch the upward/downward buttons to display Memory Stick in the Setup screen.
6.
Touch Copy. The Copy options are displayed.
7.
Touch Album. The message "All data in Album will be copied Ready?" appears.
8.
Touch OK. Copying starts.
9.
Press the on-screen key button to exit the menu.
I understand the pictures saved in the Album is smaller. Well, I suppose something is better than nothing.
Minun (12/26/2007)
bukit97 i love you
reply to this comment
mandy (01/06/2008)
You are brilliant, thank you, this worked for me too. Just got back a family pic I soo needed.
reply to this comment
Pith (02/21/2008)
Bukit97...I LOVE U TOO man!
reply to this comment
titi (04/12/2008)
i love you all
reply to this comment
jarrie (07/01/2008)
bukit97: would this still work even if i already took ONE picture after having accidentally deleted some pictures??
reply to this comment
MONTAK (10/12/2009)
THANKS BUKIT, I LOVE YOU TOO. HAHAHA
reply to this comment
Hi, I'd like to know when is SONY coming out with a new 10 Megapixel digital cam of the CYber-shotW series? (robert b. — 11/10/2006)
reply to this comment
Andrew Skinner (11/16/2006)
The W series doesn't have it out yet, but the Sony N2 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is a 10MP camera that might be comparible.
Andrew
reply to this comment
Andrew
Ben Keough (12/15/2006)
Hi, I noticed that you haven't marked any replies as the "best answer." Are you still looking for an answer? If so, I recommend you re-submit it on digitalcamera-hq.com so it will have a better chance of being noticed. These days it looks like most questions are being answered within a few days. Good luck!
reply to this comment
I'm looking for a user friendly camera that has a macro feature for taking photos of skin lesions then emailing them & need to print it for a chart. (Tracey Grove — 11/08/2006)
The quality of the print needs to be very good and the email photo needs to be sharp for the surgeon who gets it. Our office is busy so not alot of time to set up tripod etc.. Therefore need an easy to work macro as well as full face close ups. I saw the Sony N2 but wasn't sure if there is something better.
reply to this comment
Joe (11/08/2006)
I think the Nikon Coolpix S7C ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is a good choice in this situation because of the wifi connection. This means that you can send the picture straight to an email or wireless to a computer to e-mailed. I makes the transfer step easier and quicker. It also takes great clear images, of course a tripod would be ideal for super close ups, but the image stablization system in this Nikon should be just fine for getting great macro detail, especially with good clear light.
Small and a good value too.
reply to this comment
Small and a good value too.
In your opinion what is the better camera Sony Cyber N2, Canon PowerShot SD 800IS, or Canon SD900? (Bert — 11/07/2006)
I want to buy the best digital camera for about $400 dollars. I would like to know what is the better buy out of three cameras named above?
reply to this comment
Aaron (11/13/2006)
Without a doubt the N2. The IXUS cameras are fully automatic, and however beautiful the photos they produce, you can't try to stylise or alter the photos without control of the aperture and shutter speed settings!
reply to this comment
Ben Keough (12/14/2006)
Hi, I noticed that you havenât marked any replies as the "best answer." Are you still looking for an answer? If so, I recommend you re-submit it on digitalcamera-hq.com so it will have a better chance of being noticed. These days it looks like most questions are being answered within a few days. Good luck!
reply to this comment
panasonic lx2 or the sony n2 (sids — 11/06/2006)
on a one by one comparison, does the panasonic lx2 have a slight edge over the sony n2; especially in recording moving pictures. moreover does the zeiss lenses in sony have an edge over lecia lenses of panasonic.
reply to this comment
Val Franc-Houge (11/13/2006)
I'm waiting to see samples of the Sony N2 on the Web, but photo samples of the Panasonic Lx2 are pretty impressive. The Panasonic also offers full manual settings to be more creative, and a 16/9 format option which is great to show your pix on your TV. The Panasonic is also a marvellous camera for macros (if you want to take pictures of butterflies, etc. up close).You can also take group pictures and great landscapes, thanks to the true 28 mm wide angle.
On the downside, you will need a tripod for night pictures, and if you want to take movies, the Panasonic is really disappointing. It offers a higher resolution movie option, but only at 15 f/s, as a result the movie looks jerky, and the regular movie resolution of 640 x 480 pixels at 30 f/s is so compressed that the quality is poor to say the least. So here you are, the choice is yours. See what you want to use the camera for primarily, and maybe wait to see some photo samples of the N2. Good luck :-)
Val
reply to this comment
On the downside, you will need a tripod for night pictures, and if you want to take movies, the Panasonic is really disappointing. It offers a higher resolution movie option, but only at 15 f/s, as a result the movie looks jerky, and the regular movie resolution of 640 x 480 pixels at 30 f/s is so compressed that the quality is poor to say the least. So here you are, the choice is yours. See what you want to use the camera for primarily, and maybe wait to see some photo samples of the N2. Good luck :-)
Val
Ben Keough (12/14/2006)
Hi, I noticed that you havenât marked any replies as the "best answer." Are you still looking for an answer? If so, I recommend you re-submit it on digitalcamera-hq.com so it will have a better chance of being noticed. These days it looks like most questions are being answered within a few days. Good luck!
reply to this comment
Which is better Sony N1 or Sony N2? (her — 11/05/2006)
I want to buy either one so I need an opinion regarding my choice
reply to this comment
Brenda Paro (11/05/2006)
N2 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). Image stabilization and a few more pixels for not that much more money. Totally worth it. Though both are pretty cool cameras.
reply to this comment
her (11/09/2006)
I wanted to ask the same question
Please I really need an answer also, I can't decide which one to buy.
I've read a lot of comments and N1 people seem to give a lot of credit :\
reply to this comment
Please I really need an answer also, I can't decide which one to buy.
I've read a lot of comments and N1 people seem to give a lot of credit :\
jenn (11/12/2006)
needs answer on this, too. pls advise! :)
will be appreciated.. so much! tnx...
reply to this comment
will be appreciated.. so much! tnx...
Brenda Paro (11/12/2006)
Honestly, they are both good cameras and you'll probably be happy with either one. The N2 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is the newer version and has a little bit fancier stuff that the N1 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) doesn't have. Just look at the features and decide which one works best for you... I would recommend either one with a clear conscience.
reply to this comment
jenn (11/12/2006)
thanks a lot Brenda! :)
reply to this comment
Larissa (11/19/2006)
I bought the N2 because of your advice Brenda, and it does not have image stabilization at all. Your right, it takes good pictures but megapixels it's not everything in life. It lacks of a lot of features other cameras offer for a cheaper price, such as Casio exilim cameras, Canon Ixus 65, Nikon S7c, etc.
If I was able to make my choice again I wouldn't buy this camera at all. It's nice and easy to operate the touchsceen but while in playback mode it's a pain in the ass because you're unable to see your images in their full splendor cause the large semi-translucent buttons overlay large portions of the image. And even though you can remove the virtual buttons by pressing the Touchscreen button, you then lose yor ability to change to another image.
Another thing I don't like of this camera is that the N2's LCD monitor atracts a lot of powder and ends up with a lot of fingertips, which are difficult to wipe off.
So my advice to anyone who is planning on buying a touchsceen camera (N1, N2 or T50) is to make another smart election !!
reply to this comment
If I was able to make my choice again I wouldn't buy this camera at all. It's nice and easy to operate the touchsceen but while in playback mode it's a pain in the ass because you're unable to see your images in their full splendor cause the large semi-translucent buttons overlay large portions of the image. And even though you can remove the virtual buttons by pressing the Touchscreen button, you then lose yor ability to change to another image.
Another thing I don't like of this camera is that the N2's LCD monitor atracts a lot of powder and ends up with a lot of fingertips, which are difficult to wipe off.
So my advice to anyone who is planning on buying a touchsceen camera (N1, N2 or T50) is to make another smart election !!
Brenda Paro (11/19/2006)
I'm really sorry that the touchscreen doesn't work for you, Larissa. Since the original question was about two touch screen cameras, I did not bother to compare 'no touch screen' vs. 'touch screen' as I assumed the questioner had already solved that debate. But many people do have the exact issues that you have brought up in terms of touch screen cameras.
Also, regarding the image stabilization, you're correct, we discussed this in <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... thread linked to this camera</a>- although 99% of reviews out there (including this site) mention Steady Shot, according to Sony's website, this camera does not have it. Strangely enough, I spent quite a bit of time with this camera awhile back (knowing someone who owned it) and I could have sworn that it had stabilization, so it is weird that everyone says that it does when apparently... it doesn't.
'Megapixels aren't everything'- I agree with that statement completely, but for a bit extra I will lean towards the extra megapixels of the N2 over the N1 because Iif I'm buying the camera anyhow (and I would, since I like the N2 better in general) I might as well invest a few extra bucks. I also personally like this camera's image quality better than that of the cameras you mentioned which do have other features that this one might not- to me image quality is high up there in terms of the most important features of the camera, and that's what I look at first.
That's why I recommended the N2, but if it doesn't suit you you should definitely consider exchanging it- if you just bought it you should be able to do so without losing any cash. Some places are awesome about it and will even give you cash back, not just exchanges. Good luck.
reply to this comment
Also, regarding the image stabilization, you're correct, we discussed this in <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... thread linked to this camera</a>- although 99% of reviews out there (including this site) mention Steady Shot, according to Sony's website, this camera does not have it. Strangely enough, I spent quite a bit of time with this camera awhile back (knowing someone who owned it) and I could have sworn that it had stabilization, so it is weird that everyone says that it does when apparently... it doesn't.
'Megapixels aren't everything'- I agree with that statement completely, but for a bit extra I will lean towards the extra megapixels of the N2 over the N1 because Iif I'm buying the camera anyhow (and I would, since I like the N2 better in general) I might as well invest a few extra bucks. I also personally like this camera's image quality better than that of the cameras you mentioned which do have other features that this one might not- to me image quality is high up there in terms of the most important features of the camera, and that's what I look at first.
That's why I recommended the N2, but if it doesn't suit you you should definitely consider exchanging it- if you just bought it you should be able to do so without losing any cash. Some places are awesome about it and will even give you cash back, not just exchanges. Good luck.
her (11/19/2006)
I bought this camera also because of your advice, haven't had it shipped yet but as soon as I get it I will tell you if its worth it or not :)
reply to this comment
Brenda Paro (11/19/2006)
I hope it works for you! As Larissa explained, the touchscreen isn't something that everybody likes. I personally really like it- which sort of surprised me, since I was expecting to miss button navigation. But I found it a lot easier to operate than I had expected, and for me it went quicker than typical menus- and I think the image quality and ease of use of this camera are excellent. But so much of 'ease of use' is subjective and based on what you're used to and how you photograph. If you're asking about N1 vs. N2, I'm assuming you've dealt with a touchscreen before or know what they feel like so hopefully you'll have a good experience. Let us know!
reply to this comment
her (11/21/2006)
I'm happy with it. Not bad but also not very good.
reply to this comment
jenn (11/22/2006)
just bought N1. it's a used N1 actually. since i'm more of a pricey thinker. hehe but, i'm very ok with it! yep i agree with Larissa: "large semi-translucent buttons overlay large portions of the image" but i'm so cool with the slideview option. very nice 3", big, clear screen. thanks a much brenda! :D
reply to this comment
allison (03/05/2007)
how does the n1 work at night? im just worried about the image not turning out well...i heard that u cant see the image on the lcd screen in the dark, but as long as u can point, click and have a bright image once its taken, id be fine with that. also-a few people mentioned that it does not have image stabilization...i just want the camera to be able to take everyday pictures so do all the images turn out shaky, or they just arent professional grade?
reply to this comment
Kathy (03/09/2007)
I'm looking for something simple to use with great pictures. Just from the reviews I don't think I would be interested in a touch screen. Stabilization - I'm assuming that means my shakey hands won't make a difference in taking pictures. Please advise. Thanks. Kathy
reply to this comment
Amalia (03/19/2007)
Actually you can get rid of the buttons while you are viewing images. All you do is hit the first round black button on the right side. Voila! If you actually take the time to read the manual or just play around with it you will figure out that it is acutally very good. For nighttime if you want to capture lights I suggest you use the Candle light setting...this doesnt use a flash and you are better off having the camera sit on something so it doesn't move at all (such as a tripod) to get excellent quality pictures. This is because the candle light setting is really sensitive so any slight movement can make the picture blurry. Regular pictures of every day things come out excellent and I have very rarely had any blurry pictures...unless anyone holding the camera has had a few to drink of course. The N1 fulfills all my needs for now. I will probably hold off on the newer version, to me its just another 2 megapixels and maybe better at night or low light pictures. I've only had the N1 for about 7 months...I'd like to get through owning it for a year incase theres an N3 by then haha!
reply to this comment
Marnie (04/20/2007)
I have had the sony N2 for about 4 weeks and think its a fantastic camera. still finding out more things about it. I'm not much into instruction reading and find i learn more from playing about with it. Think if you haven't had much experience with digital cameras you dint have much to compare it to! As for the touch screen? totally aw some. One of the best things to have put on a digital camera.
reply to this comment
gr8rcfan (07/23/2007)
N2 has 10MP vs N1's 8MP (trivial) The older N1 has 18x total zoom vs N2's mere 6x total zoom. This may be important to you!
reply to this comment
Eric604 (08/03/2007)
I'm thinking of getting the N2 version, but was wondering...does it come in another color? I was more looking to see if it comes in black. Or do I have to go to Japan to get it?
reply to this comment
Digital (08/28/2007)
does the n1 nor n2 can capture moving objects?just like a falling stone,an electric fan turned on on its number 2 i guess...and what does ISO really mean?having a higher version of ISO can capture a moving object a lot better?
pls help me on this,coz im planning to buy n1 or n2...one more thing which is cheaper,and can anyone give a a price......thnks again...
reply to this comment
pls help me on this,coz im planning to buy n1 or n2...one more thing which is cheaper,and can anyone give a a price......thnks again...
eric Um (08/18/2008)
the good thing about n1 and n2 is that you can adjust the aperture and shutter speed
its almost like a dslr
because you control the shutter speed, aperature, ISO, white balance, and pretty much everything you control on a dslr
and people who are complaining about image stabilization
the reason other cameras need an image stabilizer is because
the camera usually has to resort to lower shutter speeds and low f-stop to capture everyday pictures
but if you know how to adjust the shutter speed, aperture, ISO
then this is the PERFECT camera for you
I bought both the N1 and N2 (because my N1 was dropped)
and the N2 has everything the N1 has except one more higher ISO setting and more megapixels
and ISO means the quality of the image
the lower an ISO (ex: 100) the better quality image you are going to have
but the darker the image is going to be
and higher the ISO (1600) and the image will have worse quality but very light
so a good middle is usually around 400
reply to this comment
its almost like a dslr
because you control the shutter speed, aperature, ISO, white balance, and pretty much everything you control on a dslr
and people who are complaining about image stabilization
the reason other cameras need an image stabilizer is because
the camera usually has to resort to lower shutter speeds and low f-stop to capture everyday pictures
but if you know how to adjust the shutter speed, aperture, ISO
then this is the PERFECT camera for you
I bought both the N1 and N2 (because my N1 was dropped)
and the N2 has everything the N1 has except one more higher ISO setting and more megapixels
and ISO means the quality of the image
the lower an ISO (ex: 100) the better quality image you are going to have
but the darker the image is going to be
and higher the ISO (1600) and the image will have worse quality but very light
so a good middle is usually around 400
N2 or T30. (Larissa — 10/31/2006)
I´m trying to decide betwween the N2, T30 and Coolpix S7c. Which one is better? Also, I really need to know if the N2 has image stabilizator (some say yes and some say no). I would really appreciate if someone in this board can help me finalize on one of the cams.
reply to this comment
Joe (11/11/2006)
Hi, I noticed that your question hasn't been responded to yet. Are you still looking for an answer? If so, I recommend you re-submit it on www.DigitalCamera-HQ.com ( DigitalCamera-HQ.com ), so it will have a better chance of being noticed. These days it looks like most questions are being answered within a few days. Good luck!
reply to this comment
I´m trying to decide between the N2 and T30. (Larissa — 10/31/2006)
Which one is better? Also, I really need to know if the N2 has image stabilizator (some say yes and some say no). I would really appreciate if someone in this board can help me finalize on one of the cams.
reply to this comment
Brenda Paro (11/01/2006)
Hi Larissa,
The Sony N2 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) does not have image stabilization according to <a href="sonystyle.com/is-bin/INTERS... website</a>. I agree with you, I keep seeing info everywhere that says that it does (including our review page for it here) but I would say that Sony's info is correct.
Regarding the N2 vs. the T30 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), I would go with the N2 just because it's the more advanced of the two. Sony is producing digital cameras at a rapid rate, but the N2 is an update on the N1 and the N1 was a fantastic camera. The N2 is getting fantastic feedback so far.
reply to this comment
The Sony N2 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) does not have image stabilization according to <a href="sonystyle.com/is-bin/INTERS... website</a>. I agree with you, I keep seeing info everywhere that says that it does (including our review page for it here) but I would say that Sony's info is correct.
Regarding the N2 vs. the T30 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), I would go with the N2 just because it's the more advanced of the two. Sony is producing digital cameras at a rapid rate, but the N2 is an update on the N1 and the N1 was a fantastic camera. The N2 is getting fantastic feedback so far.
Larissa (11/01/2006)
Hi Brenda,
Thanks you very much for answering my question but I´m sad to know the N2 lacks of image stabilization, which is a great feature to have.
Also, I´ll appreciate if you can tell me your opinion on Nikon S7c. Do you recommend the N2 over the S7c?
reply to this comment
Thanks you very much for answering my question but I´m sad to know the N2 lacks of image stabilization, which is a great feature to have.
Also, I´ll appreciate if you can tell me your opinion on Nikon S7c. Do you recommend the N2 over the S7c?
Brenda Paro (11/01/2006)
You're right, I don't quite get why the N2 doesn't have stabilization. Of course it's not absolutely needed, but that is such a great camera, it would have been a nice addition.
The S7C ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is also a great camera. It has wireless capability, which can be great if you need it- but if you don't need it, keep in mind that it may be contributing to the cost of the camera, so you may want to decide whether it's worth it to you.
The S7C does produce really, really vibrant, nice colors- I have been very impressed with what I've seen. Both close-up portraits and landscape shots look excellent. Plus, it has its own form of image stabilization- an electronic 'vibration reduction' which may not work as effectively as true optical stabilization but can still impact the steadiness of an image. Big plus if you need it.
I would almost consider it a toss-up between the N2 and the S7C... if you need the stabilization the S7C may be the way to go. Myself, I'm partial to the N2 because I lean towards Canon's designs when it comes to point and shoot digitals, but that's personal preference. You will most likely be thrilled with either camera.
reply to this comment
The S7C ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is also a great camera. It has wireless capability, which can be great if you need it- but if you don't need it, keep in mind that it may be contributing to the cost of the camera, so you may want to decide whether it's worth it to you.
The S7C does produce really, really vibrant, nice colors- I have been very impressed with what I've seen. Both close-up portraits and landscape shots look excellent. Plus, it has its own form of image stabilization- an electronic 'vibration reduction' which may not work as effectively as true optical stabilization but can still impact the steadiness of an image. Big plus if you need it.
I would almost consider it a toss-up between the N2 and the S7C... if you need the stabilization the S7C may be the way to go. Myself, I'm partial to the N2 because I lean towards Canon's designs when it comes to point and shoot digitals, but that's personal preference. You will most likely be thrilled with either camera.
We need a 9 megapixel super compact that allows you to shoot in quick succession. and a 2.5 inch or larger scre (Lyn — 10/28/2006)
It needs to have a large LCD screen at least 3 inch and be steady, able to shoot well in low light and have very fast recovery between shots. It needs upgradeable memory capability ....what is the best???
reply to this comment
Andrew Skinner (10/28/2006)
Lyn,
Finding a super compact camera with a three inch LCD screen can be tough. The Sony N2 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) does fit into your specifications. It is a 10 megapixel camera with a 3 inch LCD. For steady shots, it comes with internal image stabiliztion, and has expandable memory with Memory Stick storage devices. The fastest speed Memory Stick will help you take pictures in more rapid succession as well.
Andrew
reply to this comment
Finding a super compact camera with a three inch LCD screen can be tough. The Sony N2 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) does fit into your specifications. It is a 10 megapixel camera with a 3 inch LCD. For steady shots, it comes with internal image stabiliztion, and has expandable memory with Memory Stick storage devices. The fastest speed Memory Stick will help you take pictures in more rapid succession as well.
Andrew
Brenda Paro (12/02/2006)
Hi,
I noticed you haven't marked a response as "Best Answer"... are you still looking for help? If so, I recommend resubmitting your question at digitalcamera-hq.com so it has a better chance of being noticed. Lately it looks like questions are being answered within one or two days. Good luck!
reply to this comment
I noticed you haven't marked a response as "Best Answer"... are you still looking for help? If so, I recommend resubmitting your question at digitalcamera-hq.com so it has a better chance of being noticed. Lately it looks like questions are being answered within one or two days. Good luck!
Does it have enough memory (Lyn — 10/28/2006)
We already have casio that has an extra 1 gb memory card so that we can store a lot more photos....travel a lot where the laptop cannot go and take over 500 photo's. How many pics will the N2 hold?
reply to this comment
Andrew Skinner (10/28/2006)
Lyn,
The Sony N2 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) comes with 25megabytes of internal memory (enough to hold 5 quality shots). You can extend to a larger MemoryStick style card, and DCHQ recommends at least a 1GB card.
Andrew
reply to this comment
The Sony N2 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) comes with 25megabytes of internal memory (enough to hold 5 quality shots). You can extend to a larger MemoryStick style card, and DCHQ recommends at least a 1GB card.
Andrew
recommend the best buy for $350 - $450 please, advice? (Rosita — 10/26/2006)
Hi
I'm looking to buy a digital camera for a mate and need advice on the best buy. She likes photography and knows a bit about it. she'd like one with the LCD display screen on the back. theres so many out there its hard to know where to start so any advice would be much appreciated.
Thnks
Rosita
reply to this comment
I'm looking to buy a digital camera for a mate and need advice on the best buy. She likes photography and knows a bit about it. she'd like one with the LCD display screen on the back. theres so many out there its hard to know where to start so any advice would be much appreciated.
Thnks
Rosita
Brenda Paro (10/27/2006)
My vote is the Sony Cybershot N2 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )- gorgeous camera with a touch screen and great reviews. The only catch is that it doesn't offer straight-up manual focus, and if she is really into photography she may want to have that option. The free-spot selectable focus works really well though so it still might be a good choice.
Another option is the Canon Powershot S3 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). I'm partial to this camera because it's solidly good in pretty much all areas and super-easy to use.
If you want to browse yourself, here's our list of cameras in that price range (sorted by highest review scores):
digitalcamera-hq.com/digita...
reply to this comment
Another option is the Canon Powershot S3 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). I'm partial to this camera because it's solidly good in pretty much all areas and super-easy to use.
If you want to browse yourself, here's our list of cameras in that price range (sorted by highest review scores):
digitalcamera-hq.com/digita...
Would you advise Sony Cyber-shot DSC-N2 or Canon PowerShot SD900? (Judy Fehr — 10/24/2006)
reply to this comment
Joe (10/27/2006)
These are very similar cameras in many respects. They are brothers from a different mother if you get my drift. I would recommend the Sony N2 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) though because of its touch screen capabilities which is helpful and fun. But on a technical level these camera are similar with one major advantage of a better image stablization system on the Sony N2 an important feature for a such a small camera. Perfect reviews so far as well!! Both great cameras though so either way you are getting an amazing product.
reply to this comment
We currently have a Canon PC1038, it takes forever for the photo to take (shutter speed??). What would be a better option for us, we need speed :-)? (Christy — 10/23/2006)
I am looking for a high quality camera, yet I don't know how to determine the time delay for shots. This camera we have has a long delay in taking an individual shots (eg. action shots are next to impossible). Mega Pixels are also important to us and my husband likes the new Canon Digitals w/ the large screen on the back.
reply to this comment
Brenda Paro (11/13/2006)
Hi,
I noticed that your question hasn't been responded to yet. Are you still looking for an answer? If so, I recommend you re-submit it on www.DigitalCamera-HQ.com, so it will have a better chance of being noticed. These days it looks like most questions are being answered within a few days. Good luck!
reply to this comment
I noticed that your question hasn't been responded to yet. Are you still looking for an answer? If so, I recommend you re-submit it on www.DigitalCamera-HQ.com, so it will have a better chance of being noticed. These days it looks like most questions are being answered within a few days. Good luck!
Christy (11/14/2006)
Thank You Brenda. I resubmitted a more detailed question on Friday, but haven't gotten a reply yet. I hope to soon.....I'm running out of time. Thanks.
reply to this comment
Brenda Paro (11/15/2006)
If you still haven't gotten an answer, feel free to repost your question on this thread with the new details, or post a reply linking to your new question. I will put this question on Watch and make sure to reply asap if nobody else has.
reply to this comment
Christy (11/16/2006)
You are awesome, thanks!! We currently own a Canon Powershot S400 & find the shutter speed a real drag. This is a birthday gift for my "picky" husband. He has taken a liking the the large LCD screens ( I hear they break )...not a huge priority. He also wants > 6 megapixels, smaller size & definate faster shutter speed. We mostly shoot our children, their sports & our adventure races & bike rides, scenery. He favors the Sony's & Canon's for the reliability of brand. He is also big on the computer & pic downloads to our website. I noticed the Sony Cybershot DSC - T50/B and the new Canon Powershots. It is so difficult to choose when they vary in important features. I'm not limited to these camera options, I will take others. Cost is not a real issue, I just don't want to exceed $500. Online orders seem to offer better savings???? Birthday is weekend after Thanksgiving. Thanks for your help.
reply to this comment
Brenda Paro (11/17/2006)
Hi Christy,
No problem. The shutter lag is tricky because camera manufacturers don't officially test it and list it as a specification, so the only way to really find out is to read reviews and listen to what users are saying.
Normally I would recommend Canon over Sony because I think they're more usable cameras, and their customer service and support tends to be a lot better. But strictly in terms of shutter lag, I think the new Sonys are winning. I have heard complaints on bad lag times on some of the newer Canons (although not all of them), and if you put a comparable Canon and Sony side by side the Sony tends to be faster.
With that in mind, here are a few to look at:
<a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... N2</a> - definitely one of the faster ones out there in terms of shutter lag, start-up time etc. Has a nice big 3 inch LCD which I think is more durable than the large LCDs on the Canon Powershots. However, although our review says that it does, according to Sony's website the N2 doesn't have image stabilization. That isn't a necessary feature, but if it's something you want be aware that I don't think this camera actually has it.
<a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... T50</a>- you mentioned this one, and it may be a good choice. Shutter lag is about .28 seconds with normal settings (no flash, etc.) which is pretty darn good. This camera does have image stabilization.
If you do look into Canons, the <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... is my usual recommendation- the LCD is 2.5 inches but isn't as breakable as many of the ones on the little Canon Elphs (plus, it swivels!), and out of the Powershots this is one of the faster ones in terms of shutter lag, probably about .4 seconds.
You might also want to consider one of the Kodak Easyshares, like the <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... The Easyshares are nice and speedy (shutter lag around .2 seconds) and are super user friendly and easy to download photos from. (Most digital cameras are, but Kodak tends to spell it all out for you, plus this camera has PictBridge so if you have a compatible printer you can download and print without even using your computer). Also check out the <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... Lumix FX07</a>- crazy fast, and a really good all-around camera.
I would definitely order online- when you click on those reviews/ camera names that I linked above, you'll see Merchant Offers on the right of the screen, with prices listed. Click on them and it will take you to the site where you can order the item. I recommend Amazon because they offer fast shipping for cheap, and because I've never once had an issue with delivery from them, so you'd be assured of getting it on time. They also offer cheaper deals than most retail stores.
Finally, one last note on shutter lag: try this tip with any camera. Before you're ready to take the shot, push the shutter button down halfway and keep your finger on it. This will let the camera 'frame' the shot, which is what takes up so much time. When you're ready to take the photo, push it the rest of the way, and it will fire almost instantly. This helps immensely in fast situations.
Let me know if you need further advice and I'll be happy to help!
reply to this comment
No problem. The shutter lag is tricky because camera manufacturers don't officially test it and list it as a specification, so the only way to really find out is to read reviews and listen to what users are saying.
Normally I would recommend Canon over Sony because I think they're more usable cameras, and their customer service and support tends to be a lot better. But strictly in terms of shutter lag, I think the new Sonys are winning. I have heard complaints on bad lag times on some of the newer Canons (although not all of them), and if you put a comparable Canon and Sony side by side the Sony tends to be faster.
With that in mind, here are a few to look at:
<a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... N2</a> - definitely one of the faster ones out there in terms of shutter lag, start-up time etc. Has a nice big 3 inch LCD which I think is more durable than the large LCDs on the Canon Powershots. However, although our review says that it does, according to Sony's website the N2 doesn't have image stabilization. That isn't a necessary feature, but if it's something you want be aware that I don't think this camera actually has it.
<a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... T50</a>- you mentioned this one, and it may be a good choice. Shutter lag is about .28 seconds with normal settings (no flash, etc.) which is pretty darn good. This camera does have image stabilization.
If you do look into Canons, the <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... is my usual recommendation- the LCD is 2.5 inches but isn't as breakable as many of the ones on the little Canon Elphs (plus, it swivels!), and out of the Powershots this is one of the faster ones in terms of shutter lag, probably about .4 seconds.
You might also want to consider one of the Kodak Easyshares, like the <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... The Easyshares are nice and speedy (shutter lag around .2 seconds) and are super user friendly and easy to download photos from. (Most digital cameras are, but Kodak tends to spell it all out for you, plus this camera has PictBridge so if you have a compatible printer you can download and print without even using your computer). Also check out the <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... Lumix FX07</a>- crazy fast, and a really good all-around camera.
I would definitely order online- when you click on those reviews/ camera names that I linked above, you'll see Merchant Offers on the right of the screen, with prices listed. Click on them and it will take you to the site where you can order the item. I recommend Amazon because they offer fast shipping for cheap, and because I've never once had an issue with delivery from them, so you'd be assured of getting it on time. They also offer cheaper deals than most retail stores.
Finally, one last note on shutter lag: try this tip with any camera. Before you're ready to take the shot, push the shutter button down halfway and keep your finger on it. This will let the camera 'frame' the shot, which is what takes up so much time. When you're ready to take the photo, push it the rest of the way, and it will fire almost instantly. This helps immensely in fast situations.
Let me know if you need further advice and I'll be happy to help!
Rick (01/01/2007)
I own the Sony T-50
The red Saturation is terrible, I cannot take a shot of an object with accurate color, I must use a photo editing program to manipulate the shot to the proper color. i.e. Tan Colors are orange?
Sony T-50, Saturation Problems! i.e. Tans are Orange
Tried every setting and even sent in the camera to get checked out, camera checks out and has been reformatted but still Saturation and totally wrong colors persist. Bummer! On the plus side the magnifier mode is the best I have seem, I just have to edit every picture if I want to see the correct color. If I am missing a trick please let me know? I am contacting sony again for more answers?
Thanks, drricknyc@gmail.com
reply to this comment
The red Saturation is terrible, I cannot take a shot of an object with accurate color, I must use a photo editing program to manipulate the shot to the proper color. i.e. Tan Colors are orange?
Sony T-50, Saturation Problems! i.e. Tans are Orange
Tried every setting and even sent in the camera to get checked out, camera checks out and has been reformatted but still Saturation and totally wrong colors persist. Bummer! On the plus side the magnifier mode is the best I have seem, I just have to edit every picture if I want to see the correct color. If I am missing a trick please let me know? I am contacting sony again for more answers?
Thanks, drricknyc@gmail.com
Ami (10/26/2008)
I have a Canon Powershot S 400 (PC 1038). Now after 5 years of use its screen has become opaque. Can I get this repaired?
Please let me know
reply to this comment
Please let me know
what will you advice, Sony DSC N2, T50 or Canon SD800 (Deborah Boyd — 10/23/2006)
I have an old sony cybershot DSC W1 that has problems with blur and low light. I need a camera for baby pictures night and day with image stabilization. I have heard sony has a yellow or red hue but did not notice it while testing the N2.
reply to this comment
anonymous (10/27/2006)
ILL GIVE U ADVICE THAT GO 4 N2
ITS GOOD ND IT COMES WITH THE 10 MGPIX
reply to this comment
ITS GOOD ND IT COMES WITH THE 10 MGPIX
Ben Keough (12/07/2006)
Hi, I noticed that you haven't marked any replies as the "best answer." Are you still looking for an answer? If so, I recommend you re-submit it on digitalcamera-hq.com so it will have a better chance of being noticed. These days it looks like most questions are being answered within a few days. Good luck!
reply to this comment
does this camera have stabilization feature? (shari pate — 10/22/2006)
compare with T50. Which is the best ?
reply to this comment
dav (10/29/2006)
N2 does not have image stablization system
It does not say anywhere on the tech specs
reply to this comment
It does not say anywhere on the tech specs
Brenda Paro (12/01/2006)
Hello,
I noticed you haven't marked a response as Best Answer... are you still looking for help? If so, I recommend re-submitting your question at digitalcamera-hq.com so it has a better chance of being noticed. Lately it looks like questions are being answered within one or two days. Good luck!
reply to this comment
I noticed you haven't marked a response as Best Answer... are you still looking for help? If so, I recommend re-submitting your question at digitalcamera-hq.com so it has a better chance of being noticed. Lately it looks like questions are being answered within one or two days. Good luck!
I want to take photo of gemstone with best color and clarity. Is N2 gives that color and clarity which I want ? (Rakesh Soni — 10/22/2006)
reply to this comment
Andrew Skinner (10/22/2006)
Rakesh,
The 10 megapixel quality of the Sony N2 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) should have no issues showing the quality of your gemstone. Make sure you set it for the largest size and finest resolution to ensure the best quality photograph. Also, you might want to use a different light than a flash to avoid any glare from the stone too, e.g. light reflected off a white wall or natural light.
Andrew
reply to this comment
The 10 megapixel quality of the Sony N2 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) should have no issues showing the quality of your gemstone. Make sure you set it for the largest size and finest resolution to ensure the best quality photograph. Also, you might want to use a different light than a flash to avoid any glare from the stone too, e.g. light reflected off a white wall or natural light.
Andrew
T50 cost more than DSC N2? Why? (MrDenny — 10/20/2006)
Im just wondering because you said you perfer the n2. Is it just because the T50 is more stylish?
reply to this comment
Joe (10/20/2006)
The T50 is more expencive because it is more stylish for sure. It is very slim. But the DSC N2 is a much better vaule and a better camera in my opinion. The T50 is a party camera, this doesn't mean that it doesn't take incredible images because it does it just isn't as versitile as the DSC N2. It's hip to be square.
reply to this comment
what will you advice, DSC N2 vs T50? (mm.chi — 10/16/2006)
I'm considering to buy my first digital camere. I'm deciding between the Sony T series and the DSC n2. I like the large LCD and the touch screen feature. If anyone has any advice???
reply to this comment
Brenda Paro (10/18/2006)
Between the two, I'd choose the N2 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). Compared to the T50 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), it has...
-more megapixels (not the most important thing but a bonus)
-a faster zoom (according to timed tests, the T50 takes almost twice as long to zoom all the way out)
-crisper photos
-comparable image stabilization (the N2 has Super Steady Shot, the T50 has plain Optical stabilization... they seem to perform about the same)
-Buttons are easier to hit/ better placed
-higher ISO available (1600 vs. T50's 1000)
Just seems like a better deal.
reply to this comment
-more megapixels (not the most important thing but a bonus)
-a faster zoom (according to timed tests, the T50 takes almost twice as long to zoom all the way out)
-crisper photos
-comparable image stabilization (the N2 has Super Steady Shot, the T50 has plain Optical stabilization... they seem to perform about the same)
-Buttons are easier to hit/ better placed
-higher ISO available (1600 vs. T50's 1000)
Just seems like a better deal.
Dimitri Sokolov (10/21/2006)
The N2 does not have image stabilization at all according to Sony's website here:
sonystyle.com/is-bin/INTERS... T-50 has multiple image stabilization systems.
reply to this comment
The N2 does not have image stabilization at all according to Sony's website here:
sonystyle.com/is-bin/INTERS... T-50 has multiple image stabilization systems.
Brenda Paro (10/22/2006)
You're right Dimitri I cannot find this feature mentioned in any of Sony's media/ websites. Yet almost every review of the camera (including ours) and <a href="amazon.com/Sony-Cybershot-D... site selling it</a> mentions the Super Steady Shot. Not sure on that one. T50= a better deal either way. =)
reply to this comment
maryann (10/30/2006)
I want a compact camera that won't give me grief in the red eye department. Cost is not a factor.....just hate red eye.
Any suggestions.
Thanks for any advice.
reply to this comment
Any suggestions.
Thanks for any advice.
Lucas (11/07/2006)
Pretty much all small cameras suffer a lot from red eye. If you want a slightly cheaper camera, the N1 is pretty much the same camera as the N2 minus a few megapixels and the touchscreen.
Personaly i prefer the t10 to the t50 and i am trying to decide between those two.
N2 also has more manual settings apparently...
reply to this comment
Personaly i prefer the t10 to the t50 and i am trying to decide between those two.
N2 also has more manual settings apparently...
Rob (11/14/2006)
Brenda P
In your October 18 review you say you would choose the N2 over the T50, but then in your October 22 comment you say the T50 is a better deal. Which is correct?
Thanks
reply to this comment
In your October 18 review you say you would choose the N2 over the T50, but then in your October 22 comment you say the T50 is a better deal. Which is correct?
Thanks
Brenda Paro (11/14/2006)
Sorry about that Rob, I attribute that second comment to a plain old typo. I probably meant to say that the N2 is a better deal either way, even if it does not have image stabilization. I prefer the N2 over the T50 regardless of whether or not it has Sony's Super Shot stabilization or not.
Apologize for the confusion!
reply to this comment
Apologize for the confusion!
Angelo Alexander (11/22/2006)
Greetings
Is it for definate that the N2 does NOT have an Image Stabiliser ?
In relation to size, which is the most compact (flat) camera, T50 or N2 ?
Or is there another 'slim' camera, nice design, with 10 m pixels along with the latest technological bits (touch screan not important) that can produce the sharpest photos ever?
Best wishes
Angelo
reply to this comment
Is it for definate that the N2 does NOT have an Image Stabiliser ?
In relation to size, which is the most compact (flat) camera, T50 or N2 ?
Or is there another 'slim' camera, nice design, with 10 m pixels along with the latest technological bits (touch screan not important) that can produce the sharpest photos ever?
Best wishes
Angelo
Brenda Paro (11/22/2006)
Angelo,
It really looks like there is NOT a stabilizer on the N2. This is ultra-confusing but on Sony's website they do not have it listed as a feature so we are assuming that all the reviews etc. that say that it does have it, are mistaken (and possibly going off each other for info). I would at this point say No. I suppose the only way to know for sure would be to call Sony and ask.
The two cameras are identical in size except the Sony is about .1 inches taller. Both are .9 inches wide.
reply to this comment
It really looks like there is NOT a stabilizer on the N2. This is ultra-confusing but on Sony's website they do not have it listed as a feature so we are assuming that all the reviews etc. that say that it does have it, are mistaken (and possibly going off each other for info). I would at this point say No. I suppose the only way to know for sure would be to call Sony and ask.
The two cameras are identical in size except the Sony is about .1 inches taller. Both are .9 inches wide.
danny (11/22/2006)
can you help ,i want 2 buy my wife a new camera,have been looking @n1+n2,after reading these i 'm now confused.
we have young children so if u blink u miss thing's ect,
which 1 or even differnt camera is good 4 us ,
were amatuers,so simple/auto is best
thanx
danny
reply to this comment
we have young children so if u blink u miss thing's ect,
which 1 or even differnt camera is good 4 us ,
were amatuers,so simple/auto is best
thanx
danny
vishnu (02/21/2007)
well i have brought the t50 and i chose it over the n2 because iwhen you have a 10.1 mp camera and a small screen the picture quality becomes bad because all of the pixels are squished ina sinch screen so it should be a reasonable megapixel and reasonable screen example t50
reply to this comment
SiamDolL (12/18/2007)
this year I was going on my holiday to Disney, I wanted a camera that is smaller and easier to carry. I dreamed of T50 coz of the touch screen and the paint program. But I changed my mind and bought N2 instead coz of the faster shutter and the pixles. I love doing things in photo shop and once there is more pixlels I can crop the scene that I missed from one of my pic later without ruining it all. I don't know but I like the T50 image style but I'm using the inside quality!
reply to this comment
Advice needed to upgrade broken p92. Please help! (Sas — 10/15/2006)
I am seeking for a new camera that is small enough to fit in my hand bag or pocket and that is sturdy. I have a 2 year old daughter and a 3 year old Golden retriever who move constently. Also I would like to use it for underwater photography and would like to buy a camera as well as a underwater /marine housing for it.
What do you recommend?
Thank you!
Sas
Thank you
reply to this comment
What do you recommend?
Thank you!
Sas
Thank you
Brenda Paro (10/15/2006)
The Sony Cybershot DSC-W5 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is a nice little compact with 5 megapixels. It has above-average times for shutter lag and cycle times between pictures, so it's great for fast shots and candid moments. It also has an underwater housing available:
focuscamera.com/sc/froogle-...
reply to this comment
focuscamera.com/sc/froogle-...
Is there a macro feature? (susan — 10/13/2006)
Just curious if there's a macro setting. I need to shoot jewelry close-up.
Thanks.
reply to this comment
Thanks.
Joe (10/13/2006)
Yes the Sony N2 has a macro on/off feature, plus the great image stablization system and 3x optical zoom should help you need nice detailed close ups.
reply to this comment
dav (10/29/2006)
N2 does not have image stablization system
It does not say anywhere on the tech specs
reply to this comment
It does not say anywhere on the tech specs
Aeronautical (12/15/2006)
T30 has magnifying glass which kicks in if you click the macro twice. The macro is super and we shot a typed paper and we could see the paper fiber, like small cotton swabs. For macro T30 is better.
I have shot some Aircraft corrosion with it and you can see the grains of the corrosion. It is effective. During magnification the camera shoots a red light and then it flashes. Not sure what the red light does in macro mode
reply to this comment
I have shot some Aircraft corrosion with it and you can see the grains of the corrosion. It is effective. During magnification the camera shoots a red light and then it flashes. Not sure what the red light does in macro mode
I currently have a Casio Exilim EZ-S2, but the flash is very poor, and my night shots are very dark (at parties etc). I am looking at getting a new one with 6+ mpix and min 2.5" would this one be any better than my old one for the flash? (john — 10/02/2006)
reply to this comment
David Parker (10/03/2006)
It's guaranteed that pretty much any new digital camera will have a stronger flash than the EZ-S2. That's a four year old camera with a tiny flash that's estimated to reach only 6 feet!
The Sony DSC-T10 ( sigmund.digitalcamera-hq.co... ), for instance, which is Digital Camera HQ's top choice in the Ultra Compact category, has a flash range of 9 feet and even up to 15 feet at an ISO setting of 1000. It's got 7 megapixels and a 2.5" LCD screen.
Good luck-
reply to this comment
The Sony DSC-T10 ( sigmund.digitalcamera-hq.co... ), for instance, which is Digital Camera HQ's top choice in the Ultra Compact category, has a flash range of 9 feet and even up to 15 feet at an ISO setting of 1000. It's got 7 megapixels and a 2.5" LCD screen.
Good luck-
Would you recommend the Cybershot N2 or the DSC-T50? (Phil — 09/29/2006)
I'm having trouble weighing the manual controls of the N2 versus the image stabilization in the DSC-T50.
reply to this comment
camera? (09/29/2006)
Well, if this sways you at all, the Sony N2 actually does have image stabilization, that is, Sony's Super SteadyShot Optical Image Stabilization.
reply to this comment
dav (10/29/2006)
N2 does not have image stablization system
It does not say anywhere on the tech specs
reply to this comment
It does not say anywhere on the tech specs
Phil (10/30/2006)
The original tech specs didn't list the stabilization, but it is actually included. I purchased the N2 about 3 weeks ago and I've been very happy with it. All the advantages of a point and shoot Sony, but with some good manual controls.
reply to this comment
carlene (08/06/2007)
please, what's true? does n2 or does it not have image stabilization? do you activate it when you use the camera or is the image stabilization turned on by default?
reply to this comment
Walt (08/23/2007)
I have owned the n2 about 1 year. I have taken some wonderful pictures with it. However, if this camera has image stabilzation, then why have so many pictures blured? Could be I am expecting to much from image stabilization , if it in fact has it.
reply to this comment
how do you rate the n1 compared to the n2 (elite — 09/29/2006)
reply to this comment
camera? (09/29/2006)
Well, the most obvious difference is in the sensor. The N2 has 10 megapixels, while the N1 has 8. Frankly, the difference is not that big of a deal. Plus, the N1 also has a large amount of internal memory, making it useful as a portable photo album.
I don't think you'd have much trouble if you went with the N1. It's a great camera and cheaper than the N2.
Cameras:
digitalcamera-hq.com/digita...
reply to this comment
I don't think you'd have much trouble if you went with the N1. It's a great camera and cheaper than the N2.
Cameras:
digitalcamera-hq.com/digita...
JJohnson (10/03/2006)
One point you may wish to consider is that the N2 has the Optical Super SteadyShot facility. I don't think this is on the N1. I am looking at a new camera and it is a close decision between the N2 and the T10. Latter might just be a little too small though!!
reply to this comment
camera? (10/03/2006)
That's right, the N1 does not have IS.
Also JJ, you might want to check out the new Pentax T20 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ).
reply to this comment
Also JJ, you might want to check out the new Pentax T20 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ).
Sony Cybershot N2 Reviews
Sony Cybershot N2 Reviews by Digital Camera-HQ Users
- 3.0 out of 5
wish i still had it!!!
(David — 12/23/2007)
Great camera and great features, but the touch screen isnt durable. The screen cracked from just being in my pocket. The company said it would be cheaper to just buy a new camera than to repair it. yikes.
- 2.0 out of 5
Black screen
(kb — 12/13/2007)
Lucky the screen went black while it is still under warranty, but under a year makes me a bit nervous about how long it
will last if they do replace it. Great camera up till then.
- 4.0 out of 5
nice camera
(shailee — 12/03/2007)
the best feature is its touch sreen..awesome...
picture quality is good, but the internal functions are not that great.
but yeah, easy to handle and samrt
- 5.0 out of 5
PERFECT PICTURE QUALITY
(alisha — 11/10/2007)
i love this camera because this camera makes my skin look so good, it gives me a cremey clear complection, that i love!!!
normally anthing shiny will ruin a picture but this camera is freaking amazing!!!!! i love it serriously you will too!!!
- 4.0 out of 5
Pretty good
(Bryan Estill — 10/30/2007)
Good camera. very user friendly. fast.
Bad
My only complaint is that the picture quality doesn't really "pop". its good but not great. The colors can sometimes be a little washed out. however, its 10.1 megapixels so how bad can it be. It also doesn't have great manual contorls.
- 5.0 out of 5
I just love it!
(A. Rossman — 06/21/2007)
I received my N2 for christmas 2006 and don't know what I ever did without it!
- 5.0 out of 5
awesome
(ezara — 05/31/2007)
isin't the review title enough!
- 5.0 out of 5
Wonderful Pictures
(Rick — 02/20/2007)
I've had this camera for a month, had the TC-3 when it came out. I am usually a Nikon fan on SLR'S, but for a compact it does very nice. My only thoughts are the feel of the camera, it does not grip smoothly. Hey that's my only comment. I recommend this over the Canon IX 900, which I borrowed from a friend. And if the Image Stabilization is a problem for some...get a life.
Thank You.
- 5.0 out of 5
excellent camera
(Elizabeth Shima — 02/04/2007)
I always buy Sony products as far as I can imagine. This one really amazed my friends when I show them all the options it can do. I even had an 8x10 pictures just to prove its quality. I will have a slide show in our company using this camera for our training, see what the group of managers will think about it. With 4G chips on it, I feel like I have a movie camera at the same time. I filmed a live show in one of trade shows. It did the job more than I expected. I am really a satisfy costumer of SONY products from 2 TVs, PC, CD players and last but not the least this digital camera which I put in my purse everywhere I go. Thanks, SONY.
- 5.0 out of 5
Great X-mas gift (even when stolen)
(SW — 01/07/2007)
Excellent camera.
Had one for 4 days before it was stolen in Cabos, Mexico. No worries will be covered by the Sony Platinum MC insurance (I hope!).
Great X-mas gift for someone (in Mexico). Where it was not available. (I checked at the local Costco & Camera stores).
Expensive extra battery & Sony Super Steady Shot Image Stabilization (n/a) was not a deterrant!
Lense quality, ease of use and price competitive with other 6-10 MegaPixel cameras. Little slow to take shots in low ISO settings. Can save battery life and improve performance by turning off red-eye reduction.
Will buy another one once my claim is processed.
Damn shame about my lost pictures though. May opt for the Sony GPS unit that is available to map your photos.
Enjoy.
SW
- 3.0 out of 5
DSC-N2
(jim — 12/24/2006)
Great camera in so many respects, however, it is advertised, even on this website as having Sony Super Steady Shot Image Stabilization and it absolutely does not. I would not have purchased this camera if I had not been deceived. Sony literature does not claim to have this feature. Apparently at this expense, you would expect it to have it.
- 5.0 out of 5
Love my Sony Cybershot N2!
(BCR — 12/20/2006)
This is an amazing and versatile camera in a very small package. The 10.1 MP allows crisp, clear, detailed photos in any light and still fits easily in my purse. The touch screen menu is a breeze to navigate and it quickly connects to any TV to share your slide shows. ButterflyPhoto.com gave me the best price and great customer service.
- 5.0 out of 5
more than excellent
(Elldone Michael A. Pastor — 11/14/2006)
I think you'd better to have one in order to say something about it - I had one and until now it is still more than excellent comapred to other brands
- 5.0 out of 5
AWESOMEEE
(Mar — 10/08/2006)
this camera is soo good...the picture is amazing and te touch screen ads a high tech touch...u can download music onto it and it has a rechargeable battery. you can hook it to ur tv and do slide shows with music on it and u also can add hearts n other cool graphics with a touch of a button
