Hey! You should know that this product has been discontinued. Here are our current recommended cameras in the Point and Shoot Digital Cameras category.
Sony Cybershot DSC-T10
Editor's Review
Much like the T30 before it, the Sony Cybershot T10 provides photographers with a satisfying feature set in an eye-catching body. The T10 is available in classic silver, black, pink, and white, perfect for coordinating with outfits and other accessories. The T10 is the quintessential party shooter, thin enough to fit in a pocket and forget about, but ready in an instant when needed. The Super SteadyShot Optical Image Stabilization also makes sure that your shots come out crisp and clear, even if you're not so steady yourself.
Editor's Review
Much like the T30 before it, the Sony Cybershot T10 provides photographers with a satisfying feature set in an eye-catching body. The T10 is available in classic silver, black, pink, and white, perfect for coordinating with outfits and other accessories. The T10 is the quintessential party shooter, thin enough to fit in a pocket and forget about, but ready in an instant when needed. The Super SteadyShot Optical Image Stabilization also makes sure that your shots come out crisp and clear, even if you're not so steady yourself.
Specifications
- 7.2 megapixels
- 3x optical zoom
- Auto focus and exposure
- JPEG file format
- Movie mode with sound
- ISO 80-1000
- 2.5-inch LCD
- Memory Stick storage (56MB internal)
- Lithium-ion battery
- Release Date: Aug 01, 2006
Shop for T10 Accessories
Sony Cybershot DSC-T10 Comments & Questions (write your own!)
But I've also read that the T10 doesn't have an English language option if it's in Japanese as it's likely to have been purchased in country.
But I'm betting that if you call Sony tech support they can help you around changing it. It may need a reload of the English firmware.
Follow the steps below to troubleshoot this issue.
1. Perform a power reset on the camera.
2. If the issue is not resolved, turn off the camera.
3. Remove the Memory Stick® media from the camera.
4. Clean the metal contacts on the Memory Stick media with a soft, dry cloth or clean pencil eraser.
5. Reinsert the Memory Stick media into the camera.
6. Turn on the camera.
7. If the issue reoccurs, turn off the camera.
8. Remove the Memory Stick media from the camera.
9. Insert a different Memory Stick media.
10. Turn on the camera.
NOTE: If the issue does not occur with different Memory Stick media, the previous Memory Stick media may be faulty and should be discarded.
It´s not always what happens, and sometimes, after the camera is off, if I´m pressing the on/off button, the light stops flashing, but the camera does not turn on. To return to work, only several times slipping protective lens cover.
P.S.: Sorry about my English because I'm Brazilian.
I've restarted the camera more than twice. I´ve also formatted the memory stick, and also the camera's internal memory, but didn´t work.
I also believe that the solution is to update the firmware, but I can´t find.
Thanks for your help!
1Select [OK] with v on the control button, then press z.
The message “Initialize all settings Ready?” appears.
2Select [OK] with v, then press z.
The settings are reset to the default setting.
This will reset everything back to the factory default settings.
Batteries are another issue. This camera is up to two years old and Lithium Ion batteries do begin to lose their capacity over time. The older they are, the weaker they become even after a fresh recharge. So even though they may be recharged, they still make not be powerful enough to run the camera. Try a NEW LiOn.
If this doesn't work, then you're looking at a repair. But understand that without warranty coverage the average cost of a camera repair is around $180. As such, it may cost more to repair than it is really worth. The rule of thumb is that if the estimate for repair is north of 50% what you paid for it, you're better off taking that money and buying a newer and upgraded model.
Thanks
Another tip is to go to Sony's website and look for firmware updates. Download and install them. While you're there, see if you can find a service advisory which addresses your Red line issue. If there is one, SONY may be offering to repair the screen for free as part of a recall.
Thanks =)
You can reset the firmware by using your USB connector and going to this link here ( esupport.sony.com/US/perl/s... ). Make sure you click the link that corresponds to your operating system. I would also check which focus mode you're in (page 35 of your userguide ( 129.33.22.12/release/DSCT10... )). You might have some issues on what mode you're in. I hope this helps.
Andrew
I am dealing with that- somethimes i am just opening the lens cover so hard and it works, but only sometimes. Now I have a new problem with E:62:10 blinking on my screen. Can someone please tell me what that is or even better how can I repair it ? thanks
Sony recommends resetting/reinitializing the camera.
Select [OK] with ^ (triangle) on the control button, then press O (circle). The message "initialize all settings Ready?" appears. Select [OK] with ^ (triangle) on the control button, then press O (circle). The settings are reset to default settings.
(page 63 of the manual)
And I read loli's answer and tried it.(Blow lens a bit)
Then the flash lamp flashed without pressing shutter button,
and the message on my T10 also disappered.
Thanks very much, loli!!
and on the screen it show E:61:10.
it is very blurry like if it was zoomed in and i cant take pictures.
ive tried initializing it over and over,
i tried blowing on the lens but nothing works!
please help meeeeee!
IT WORKED TO ME !!!!
i had the same error and i tried it and it worked!!! you can read it on the camera hacker forum. u will find it when u search it on google..
the e:62:10 must refer to an error in the sliding mechanism, not the lense itself.
i assume that sometimes, blowing into the lense works because it clears out the jam in the opening mechanism itself, not the lense.
If not, there's a chance the batteries are bad. I'd try a new battery before you consider the camera dead/ in need of repair. Also check and make sure there's nothing (dust, etc.) obstructing the battery connection.
anyOne can answer my question...
..plz send the answer to my email..migztab@yahoo.com.ph
Spray around the edge of the lens with compressed air. Stuff must get lodeged in the seal. It works perfect now.
Please any help will be appreciated
New batteries and was working a couple of days ago.
Comes on but lens will not open
It works right away !
When turning on the camera, and receiving the "access" message then having it shut down again, it is because you have dirt or sand in the lens that exits the camera. Use some compressed air or your hefty lungs and get rid of it, and it should fix it.
These are the only two problems i've had so far, and these are the solutions that worked for me, hope it helps you guys too :)
First go to <a href="z-a-recovery.com/demo-ir.ht... site</a> to go through the demo on how to recover your pictures.
Then you download the file recovery program from <a href="z-a-recovery.com/download.h... site</a>
Lastly insert your memory stick to a card reader and plug the reader to the USB port of the computer.
The rest is just following what you see in the demo and you will get your pictures back.
Katona
Andrew
But for you, that isn't the case. I've read that perhaps blowing some air into it may realign the lens motor. Or even giving it a gentle wack on your knee. VERY gentle.
But to be on the safe side, I'd contact SONY support on how to fix it.
Mine just started E:61ing, and what I read is not too encouraging.
You would think after unleashing rootkits on us and having Homeland Security on their backsides they might want to start fixing their public image - not making it worse.
Most camera software offer you a choice of Mac version or Windows version.
Just check for the correct version to install and you will have no worries over compatibility.
2. T10 software will have downloading and simple editing features. However, there are many 3rd party softwares that are gaining popularities.
Picasa, for example, offer two tools for Mac users to bulk upload photos to Picasa Web Albums.
You need to download the Picasa Web Albums Exporter for iPhoto and install the iPhoto plug-in that uploads your photos directly from iPhoto.
There is also a Picasa Web Albums Uploader. This is a separate application for uploading photos. If you don't use iPhoto, or want a few more features, this one's for you.
To download Picasa Mac Uploaders, visit picasa.google.com/web/mac_t... and click "Free Download." You will get both the Exporter and the Uploader.
3. Lastly, you might wish to try some of the free Mac softwares for picture viewing and simple editing at this site :
graphicssoft.about.com/od/i...
The T10 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) has a definite size/weight edge, especially in terms of its slimness, but the W100 is a much more reliable and full-featured camera. It's also still quite small.
The W100 offers higher resolution (8MP vs. the T10's 7MP), and also uses a much larger imaging sensor (1/1.8" vs. the T10's 1/2.5"). This combination should mean that the image quality will be better than with the T10 (and user/pro reviews seem to indicate that it is).
The W100 also has a greater degree of manual control options, which will be useful if you're shooting at night without flash, or if you want to get artistic later on. Both cameras (and indeed the smaller Sonys in general) have issues with red eye, though the W100 doesn't seem to have as many problems with the white spot issues that the T10 has been plagued with.
In my opinion, the W100 is by far the better camera here, though it does lack the WOW factor that the T10's design gives you. It should also be quite a bit cheaper.
Hope this helps!
The T10's screen is indeed also much sharper (double the pixels, as you noticed). This should help significantly in playback mode, in telling if the pictures you've taken are any good.
However, the majority of user reviews here and elsewhere (or if not a majority, at least a significant number) are harsh on the T10's image quality in general and particularly on its issues with red-eye and white spots when using flash (as you mentioned).
It seems to me that while the T10 wins out in most gadget-oriented areas, it loses pretty badly in image quality. In other words, all the image stabilization and LCD pixels in the world won't save you from red-eye or white spots, and they certainly won't compensate for subpar overall image quality. And isn't high image quality the real goal of any camera, anyway?
There are some cameras which have image stabilization, the same sensor size of the W100, the LCD quality of the T10, and the same stylish design in the T10.
Here there are some example of those:
* Pentax Optio A20
* Ricoh Caplio R5
* Canon PowerShot G7
Don't be focused only on Sony... because they are good in electrnic devices... but cameras needs other things than electronics.
Hope this helps you...
Alan.
If you read camera reviews, you will find many compacts have the same problem, and many tried ways and means to reduce it with varying degrees of success.
The white spots, as explained by Sony, only occurs under certain conditions, and the condition is where the environment is dusty.
Blurry pictures is partly due to the settings and partly due to the low light condition. After some practice, you will learn how to avoid blurry pictures.
All considered, including the image stabilisation and better resolution LCD screen, I would say go ahead and buy T10 if you like it.
The only advantages for the T10 is a better resoloution LCD & image stablizer, but the W100 contains a bigger sensor and extra mega pixel
This sounds like an issue with your camera's CCD (imaging sensor). If you're still under warranty with Sony, assuming you haven't dropped or otherwise physically damaged the camera, you should be able to get it repaired for free (aside from postage to the repair center). If you're out of warranty, the cost of the repair will likely be pretty high. I'd still ask Sony for an estimate, but if the repair price is astronomical it might be time to consider upgrading.
You can request a repair from Sony here ( eservice.sony.com/webrma/we... ).
Good luck!
Thank you so much...Frederick
Download and install Magitime from the site :
freedownloadscenter.com/Mul... the software.
Click the "+" sign on the top left hand corner to select your picture.
Click the small picture that appears and the date will be add to the large picture on the Right Hand Side of the screen.
I am really hoping to hear from someone who actually owns the camera. I am aware of the features and technical capabilities, but I would like a hands-on response. Thanks!
I don't actually own the camera, but here's what I've managed to find:
According to this in-depth review ( imaging-resource.com/PRODS/... ), the higher ISO settings on the T50 do indeed produce a lot of image noise, comparable to its predecessor, the T10. Furthermore, nearly half of the "cons" listed at the end of the review have to do with low light shooting:
# High-ISO shots are very noisy, particularly under limited-light conditions
# Short exposure times limit low-light shooting somewhat (still more than adequate for typical city night scenes though)
# Below-average white balance performance under household incandescent lighting
Reviews from CNET and Steve's Digicams also confirm the high ISO/low light issues, though CNET downplays them and says the pics should be fine for viewing on the computer or 4x6" prints. User reviews ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) here at DCHQ are generally pretty positive, but none of them really address the low light issue (unlike the reviews of the T10). Amazon user reviews talk about red eye/white spot issues when shooting with flash, but not much about the image noise.
Hope this helps!
I saw those reviews too. I was really excited when I first heard about the camera because I loved the specifications. So when I saw those reviews I was hoping that they were wrong, which is why I posted it on here. I was hoping someone who actually owned the camera would tell me what I wanted to hear. Doesn't seem like that happened though. Anyhow, I bought the camera anyway because I really like the other specs. We'll see how it does...hopefully it is at leaste better than my Nikon L1 (which is an amazing camera other than low light). Well, since no one else answered I will show you my thanks for your attempt by giving you the points. Thank you...it was so nice of you to take the time to get this info for me!
Sarah
Once you've got it you should post back here and let us know how it actually is, in case anyone else searches and finds this thread.
Good luck!
Thanks much,
Hazel
Also, I don't have your e-mail. The best thing to do is click on the "watch this question" link on the top of the page right above my original question.
-Sarah
-Hazel
-hazel
Thanks!
I did however notice the orbs. Little white spots did show up in many of the darker photos which is a bit distracting. This I was not pleased with.
Bottom line: If you want a cool camera to show off to friends and family and has fun features like the touchscreen and the slide show function, this is an awesome camera. But if you are looking for something that is small and won't have a lot of red eye...good luck finding one of those. Also, if you like the design of the T50 but aren't worried about the touchscreen and prefer a smaller price tag, the T9 and T10 are great little cameras. Plus, they are significantly smaller than the T50. The only downside is that they don't have quite as good of an image stabilizer.
Hope that helps.
Hazel
I also have the whit bubbles on my pictures made with flash. Check out the question about this in the 'Ask' section of T50 (digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... it is not a 'bit distracting', but so bad, that if don't manage to get rid of that, I'm gonna send my camera back. For so much money I want to have a camera which performs well under lowlight conditions, too.
I have made over 200 test pictures already. I must say, the camera performs excellent in decent daylight, handling is just perfect, I love the LCD touchscreen, and all the fancy features. But these bubbles drive me crazy. 50-60% of pictures with flash are practically useless. See the other thread for sample photos.
Really a pity to screw up such a nice camera this way... :(
I contacted Sony Support on this issue and waiting for their answer. Depending on that I decide if I send the cam back or not.
The baseline price for the T50 at reputable internet sites right now is about $330 (I use Amazon as a baseline because their prices are low but not the lowest, and they're among the most reputable internet retailers). So, $370 sounds about right for a brick & mortar markup. Personally, I'd always look to internet retailers before I'd buy from a store, but I know some people prefer the hands-on experience. :)
Hope this helps.
I contacted the Sony Support ,and they said I should send the camera to their service center for examination, but I don't have the time for that right now. I'm not even willing to do that hassle, bitterly I chose the easier way and have the camera sent back to Amazon.
Also, stay away from Canon Powershots, especially the later models. They look beautiful, but that E18 glitch is a killer. EVERY camera gets it, and it won't recover.
I'm also looking for a new digital camera, and I think i want a Sony Cybershot T50. I go to a lot of shows, and i think this camera will be perfect for me.
I do, however have one query:
do the white spots still appear if the picture is taken in the dark, with the flash function fully utilized? Or do the spots only occur when the flash is off?
Thanks!
Carrie, without flash it is all fine, no spots.
In lowlight condition it is more difficult to make pictures without flash that are not blurred, but this is more of a general photography problem. Best is to use a tripod. I wanted to have a camera for snapshots, and that in dark, too.
Endre, based on what I have researched, the 900 Ti was called "a big disappointment" in the Ixus line of Canon. My cousin got the Ixus 800 last year and he's still very happy with it. Due to the very many (and I am not exagg.) reviews and blogs I have read, there was a "star model" in the Ixus line and the 900 Ti ain't it. Do tell me what you have finally decided to get. I am going to H. Kong this coming March and will not make a decision until then. Hope when the time comes, I'll have made a decision. This is a big investment for me since I am not a techie.
i think it's seriously impossible to find a flawless compact digital camera.
i'm keeping my Casio Exilim and getting a SLR camera instead.
even the Panasonic lumix has its problems.
my personal conclusion:
when you take that much technology and cram it into that small of a space, you're bound to go wrong somewhere.
my advice:
splurge and get a higher-quality camera.
i hope this helps.
Best regards.
PLEASE rethink buying the PanaLumix FX50. the lens is REALLY bad. I tried it out, and you can tell immediately how awful it is. I'm sorry if you were really set on this camera, but i was too, and it's a piece of junk.
nice, hazel.
i bought the cybershot n2.
i'm basically in love with it.
My wife insisted on having a small cam for point and shoot pictures as she is kind of afraid of the big cam and its controls :). So I halfway left it over to her what she wants. We had a look on some cameras and she decided for the Kodak v705. It's a pretty nice cam, quick and has lot of settings, although I'm not 100% satisfied with the picture quality, which is much worse than those made by the Sony (of course there is a tiny bit of difference in lens, too :) ). I think it just compresses the pictures too much and there is no possibility to set the pic quality. My Sony makes ~2Mb pictures at 5MP, the Kodak ~1Mb at 7MP, sometimes only 800Kb. For normal printouts it's fine, I think it wouldn't even appear on an A4 picture. So it's a compromise, I still have my Sony, she has hers, everyone is happy :) (the original idea was to replace the Sony).
I wonder if the T-100 has better qualities in lowlight conditions than the T-50.
Good Luck!
Thanks
It only shows that white spots only appear under certain conditions. and Sony identified this as dust particles reflecting lights into the camera.
Sony realized this issue and has recorded it in it's camera manuals as well as in the FAQs. see for example
iq.sony.com/srvs/autorespon...
esupport.sony.com/US/perl/s...
Good Choice!
i am confused which camera to buy...Nikon P3 or Sony t10??
i like both the cameras and both of them have some independant features...
please help me out!!!
cheers
Mav
These are two very comparable cameras in many respects, and it's not surprising you're having a hard time choosing between them. Here are a couple of the main differences:
1. Size/weight. The P3 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is larger and heavier than the T10, but not by a huge amount. Mostly it's thicker and thus not as easily pocketed.
2. Wireless. The P3 has built-in wireless, which is pretty cool, but I've heard that it's not implemented terribly well. Your mileage may vary.
3. Imaging sensor. The P3 has slightly higher resolution (8MP vs the Sony's 7MP), but it's also got a larger sensor. This usually means lower noise levels in the images the camera produces.
Users generally seem to prefer the P3 by a small margin--they often complain about red eye and image flare (white dots) problems with the T10. However, the T10 is undeniably the sleeker, cooler gadget camera. If I were you I'd try to get my hands on both of them and see which feels better to you. Good luck!
cheers
If you're comfortable with a camera and like the capabilities, I would go with that. Being comfortable while shooting is very important and will show in your photos. The two cameras aren't that much different in their capabilities, and exactly the same on resolution. If a touch screen is worth the $50 US to you, then go for it, otherwise, stick with what you know.
Andrew
thanks for your reply. Where I'm getting the camera from its only $40 aus difference, so its hard to choose on price :). but what I'm trying to work out, is what the touch screen is like? Have you ever used one, do they smudge easy, are the functions harder to use than buttons, and do they usually last?
Its so tempting because it would be a new toy for me as I have never used a touch screen before. If only I could try it.
Thanx
Jake
Personally, I'm very wary about touch screen use. I feel a lot more comfortable with the exterior buttons. A feature like that just wouldn't be worth it to me. I'd rather put that money towards an extra battery or memory card.
Andrew
Sounds like you had a bad experience? I am still yet to use one. But most of what you said is what I'm worried about.
Does anybody know if it has photo editing options on the touchscreen? Like free hand editing, say like microsoft paint (i know simple). I have looked everywhere on the internet but the only info i can find is all the statistics of the camera and no real features.
Jake
With the T50, your extra $50 gets more than just the fun touch screen (which I feel is actually more cumbersome than the push buttons on the T10). You get a more powerful flash and a macro mode as well as longer battery life. The flash in the T10 is notoriously under powered and the T50 puts out approximately twice the amount of light which is better for small group photos.
Personally, I'd like to get something with the push buttons of the T10 with the features of the T50. I like the buttons because they are easier to mash with my thumb when I'm in a hurry and want to change a setting.
Besides, the T50 comes in that sexy red that makes it even more fun at parties.
Im not a pro and will mainly use the camera for backyard partys and nights out, if its flashy, looks good, and is the same color as my convertable, im happy. So I have desided to get the T-50 in red. I found some sites where you can actualy demo using the camera touchscreen with your mouse and I really like it. I would post the site but I lost it :*(.
When I finaly get it ill post a reply with what its like.
Jake
What you're describing sounds like a problem with the camera's CCD (imaging sensor). (Assuming that the snapshots you're taking don't show up as anything other than a black screen in review mode.) This is a problem that's definitely going to require a repair, but since the camera is new, it will be a free repair under the 1yr warranty. You might also consider (if it's really, really new) taking it in and exchanging it for a replacement from the place you bought it. Assuming you're in the USA, you can request a repair from Sony here ( eservice.sony.com/webrma/we... ). If you're not in the US, simply load Sony's site for your region and look for the service/support page, and then "request a repair".
Good luck!
I would not prefer very costly camera but anything below Rs.20000 will be good enough. I was planning to go for a Sony digital camera.
Plz help me decide
1st lets take a look at the two cameras
The DSC-T10 Digital Camera has 7.2MP, 3x Opt,
Ultra-slim form factor, literally shirt-pocket sized
image stabilization
faster than average autofocus performance,
Big, LCD screen,
video capability with sound
USB 2.0 computer connection
Excellent print quality, very nice looking 13x19 inch prints according to some reviews
Under $300
The Cyber-shot DSC-W70 7.2MP, 3x Opt
$230 on-line price.
Fast, excellent shutter response, excellent shot to shot speed
Very capable movie mode
Very fast multi-burst (reduced resolution) mode, great for analyzing golf/tennis swings
LCD is usable in very bright light
Design is compact but usable, fits the hand well
USB 2.0 port
The cameras look very similar on paper with one exception - Image Stabilization.
The T10 cost $70 more and you get Image Stabilization.
The choice is yours. If your budget can handle the $300. It will pay dividends in your Photos.
Have fun with your camera
Image Stabilization is a major help in low light. It will allow you to take photos without flash in low light while holding the camera in your hand rather than a tripod.
Faster Shutter speeds - the term is normally used to indicate how well the camera is able to take pictures as the light gets dimmer. The faster the shutter, the better the camera can capture the photo you want.
If you want to learn more about these topics, you need to do a search on the internet.
W30's shutter speed is frm 2 to 1/1000
while T10's is frm 1 to 1/1000
But my old camera Coolpix 3200 had a range of
4 to 1/3000.
So does this mean tht my old camera is better at taking pics then these 2
You can get the manual and other included documents here ( esupport.sony.com/US/perl/m... ) at the Sony site. They're in .pdf format.
Hope this helps!
Thank you so much for your support. This was what i was looking for. Of course it helped me a lot
Thanks !
The second camera I would recommend is the Canon Powershot Sd800 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) it has the best image stablization in the price range and it is almost insanely compact (in a good way). It is not as thin as the two other models in discussion but it is petite to say the least. It has a powerful flash and great red eye reduction. I know you mentioned that you like the non moving lens and the style of the T10 but I really think this is your best bet for a camera with some powerful in a small body, like Nepolean.
2)Nikon Coolpix S7C
3)Canon powershot Sd800IS
Richio
if the light is OK you will get very good results.
If you want widescreen movies, the Lumix LX2's movie mode takes full advantage of the 16:9 format with a higher-than-average movie resolution of 848 x 480 pixels at 30 frames per second with sound. It can also record with VGA (640 x 480) resolution at 4:3 (std TV), The wide screen is not âhigh definition". The camera will record at HD 1280 x 720 resolution but a frame rate of just 15 fps. (Not Good)
The camera can easily be adjusted between 16:9, 3:2, and 4:3 settings. When shooting at 16:9 the camera uses all 10mp. When you flip to 3:2, resolution drops to 8.5 megapixels, at 4:3 it goes to 7.5 megapixels. Remember the camera uses the widest sections of the 16:9 10mp and crop shots for 3:2 and 4:3.
On-line price $400.
Happy movie and picture taking.
megapixel.net/reviews/sony-... a review of the T30 talking about available resolutions and if there was an email option, they would probably have mentioned it there.
Hope that sort of helps.
Sorry to hear about your stolen camera.
The NV10 has sort of a split critical consensus--lots of people love its design and features, but have issues with the quality of images it puts out. Check out the reviews at Amazon ( amazon.com/Samsung-NV10-Dig... ) for an example of this sort of reaction.
Personally, I'd recommend the Canon A640 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) (or its little brother the A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )). It's got roughly the same feature set as the NV10 with a few added bonuses (flip-out LCD, longer zoom, etc) and a much more solid critical reaction. Everyone seems to love this camera. It is, however, a little larger than the NV10, mainly in thickness. If you really need to go small, check out the Canon SD800 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), which is comparable in most categories to the NV10 and A640 (fewer megapixels, though) and also features optical image stabilization, which will save a lot of shots that would otherwise be lost to motion blur.
Hope this helps. :)
ALOT ALOT of the pix I took with the T7 were on nights out with friends, and the fact that Ive had such a slimline camera in my hands kind of makes me reluctant to go much bigger.
Ive also never printed my shots. Theyve all been for email and online use.
What do u recommend as the best of the Sony Cybershot series?
And does your choice fair better than any of the Casio Exilims?
Im going on vacation next month and need to buy it soon, just so baffled with all the choice.
Thanks so much for ur advice.
As far as Sonys go, the top-rated ultra-compacts seem to be the T9 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) (the newer T10 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) seems to have some serious issues with pictures using flash) and, a little bigger but still smaller than the Canon A-series I mentioned, the W100 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). It's about 4mm bigger than the T9 in all dimensions--not bad.
In the Casio range I'd check out the EX-Z70, which is pretty feature-packed and rated well by users.
According to this question thread ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) elsewhere on DCHQ, the T10 supports up to a 4gb Pro Duo memory stick, so you should be a-ok with it. Good luck!
The Sony T10 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is a great choice. If you like that, you might want to look at the Panasonic FX50 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), the Canon SD40 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), the Panasonic FX07 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), and the Sony W100 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). All have very similar capabilities and are priced the same or lower than the Sony T10 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). I would recommend going in to a retailer and holding the cameras to see what you're comfortable with in your hand before purchasing. This will ensure a good fit for you.
Andrew
I would go for the Sony.
It's hard to choose between these four though. I'm willing to pay this price range because I of course want a good camera to last after the road trip. I am attrated to the Sony because its sleek and small but many reviews I read recommend a Canon. But the Ion Batteries worry me for being on the road and also the movie mode.
HELP ME please!
THANK YOU ALL
What other features would you like? Do you like zoom lenses, how large do you want to print photos, do you want something compact, do you like touchscreens, do you want to be able to manually control settings, is there a brand you prefer? Let me know a little more info about your preferences and I'll try to point you to the right camera.
Anyhow, I agree with you that the Canons are a great choice, easy to use and good picture quality, plus advancing quickly as far as digital technology. I would recommend the Powershot A640 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) as my current favorite all-around camera. If you want something a little smaller/ sleeker, the Powershot SD700 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is fantastic, and the Sony Cybershot T10 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is good if you're considering looking outside of Canon.
regards
yellow
It's not required to push the button halfway, then wait, then push the rest of the way; you can just push it once, but doing so means that the camera focuses and then shoots the picture all at once, so there is often a much longer shutter lag time.
I have been studying compact cameras with miovie capabilties and the Nikon Sc7 caught my eye , however when I went into mthe shop the man said that definatley Sony is better brand for movie clips and suggested the T10. It is certainly smaller, whcih is essential for me. He also mentiond the stabalisation was betterr ion the SONY T10. I then see that there is a T50 is that much better than the T10. I also see that there is a S9 is that better than the S6. I son't think I need Wi/Fi
Well it is true the Sony T10 does have really great movie capabilites in fact the same as the Nikon thought. The T10's has Movie mode with MPEG VX Movie option for continuous 30 fps recording at 640 x 480 pixel resolution. (Requires Memory Stick PRO Duo.) The Nikon has the same settings. So there really is not a difference. The T10 does seem to have a longer batt life though so that might effect your purchase. But remember Sony cameras only take memory sticks which tend to be more expencive then the SD cards the Nikon would take.
Are you looking at the SD800 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), or is your question just connected to it by coincidence? =) If so, the SD800 is one of the speedier ones on the market, so may be a good place to start. The Kodak Easyshares are generally faster too. Let me know if there are a few specific cameras you're interested in and I'll try to help explain further.
I am interested in the SD800 IS and the Sony T10. I need a fast camera since my new puppy always seems to move before I take a shot with my old camera. I also want something bcompact so that is why I have narrowed it down to these two. Thanks for your help.
Susan
548 (standard)
A 1GB, or even a 512MB memory stick will hold many more than 15 images. You must have the memory stick inserted in the camera before you take the images though. Good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
and Sony printers as for Sony camera?
I personally like the small, "pop-n-shoot" cameras that have a small, portable form factor, a quick boot time, and 7+ MP. I can whip it out and capture a moment as it happens instead of having to pull out and deal with a giant SLR. The large MP comes in handy so I can digitally zoom (crop) it later, rather than having to mess with zooming on the spot.
The con to such tiny, "pop-n-shoot" cameras is you sacrifice lens size and advanced features like aperture and shutter speed control. The small lens isn't able to capture as much light, so the 'shutter' has to stay open longer, ultimately making indoor pictures blurry, even with a flash.
But, the T10 is special for two reasons. 1) It can capture at ISO1000, which means it needs less light so the 'shutter' doesn't need to be open as long, making the picture less susceptible to blurring. 2) Even though the 'shutter' is open for less time, it still may be long enough to blur your images if you're not absolutely still. That's where the one-of-a-kind gyroscopic image stabilizer comes in. When you shake, it moves the lens to compensate, so the image isn't blurry.
You could also take a look at the <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... T20</a>. Small and compact with equal MP rates. But it's a tad more expensive than it's Canon competitor.
I'd go with the A710IS. It has a Kids & Pets special preset. And you also have a nice video feature for shooting on the spot video moments.
That's the way I'd go.
The Ixus 65/SD630 has gotten far better reviews, as well, from real users. I'd definitely pick it over the T10.
Digital cameras automatically select the ISO but most have a setting to change it manually. Auto ISO generally works best for bright scenes.
Shooting at a lower ISO number requires more light than shooting at a higher number. Lower numbers result in images with the least visible noise, which is desirable.
The higher the number, the more noise. The amount and degree of noise varies from camera to camera.
I noticed that your question hasn't been responded to yet. Are you still looking for an answer? If so, I recommend you re-submit it on www.DigitalCamera-HQ.com, so it will have a better chance of being noticed. These days it looks like most questions are being answered within a few days. Good luck!
I am by no means a camera expert but I hope this helps a little. I am still deciding which camera to buy myself.
Thanks!!!
I noticed you haven't marked a response as Best Answer... are you still looking for help? If so, I recommend re-submitting your question at digitalcamera-hq.com so it has a better chance of being noticed. Lately it looks like questions are being answered within one or two days. Good luck!
Thank you so much.
You can find the software for the Sony T10 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) at the [esupport.sony.com/US/perl/m... site[/url]. Unfortunately, Sony no longers offers the software for your camera via their site, but you can purchase it.
Andrew
Andrew
Good luck with your new baby.
I currently have a 3 year old Sony cybershot. But it is terrible in low light environment. I heard really good things about the Canon, but it looks more bulky (thicker) than the Sony T-10.
Also since I have existing sony equipment, should I look the choice of media sway my decision?
Neither camera is impressive on the zoom front. Both end up at about the same telephoto setting (actually, the Sony is slightly more zoom), but the Canon has a nice feature of having a wider wide angle (great for indoor shots).
Both have good upper limits of ISO, and this year's image sensors and processors are better at dealing with noise than a year or two ago, so low-light capabilities should be better. But the truth is the ultra-compact cameras are not the best for speed: you give up something with size, and one of those things is the ability of the camera to gather the light it needs to make a quick focus and exposure calculation. And small cameras also tend to have minimal flash.
But how do they compare? Really, they are about the same. Both have only a few reviews, but no red flags. The Sony is a little less expensive and your memory stick might still work. Sony?
Between the two I'd pick the T10. Prices are comparable on them nowadays too.
This isn't really something you can adjust- this is called the camera's recovery time, and some cameras handle it better than others. For super fast operation, you'd have to spend some cash on a fancy DSLR; however, there are a few point and shoots that are known for fast recovery time and might be worth looking into:
Sony T10 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) (recovery time of about 1.6 seconds)
Canon Powershot A620 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) (good all-over speeds, recovery time and power-up time)
Also keep in mind that any camera no matter how fast will slow down when the flash is on- recovery time might be twice as long as it is without the flash.
You may also want to consider looking into a camera with burst mode, which is where you can take several pictures in quick succession, if you are taking lots of photos at events where things happen quickly.
There are a few small things you can do to speed up your own camera. Avoiding the flash does help. So does saving your photos in smaller resolution- if you don't need huge resolutions for photos, don't use them as they take longer to save. Don't save in TIFF or RAW if you want speed- stick to JPG images. And finally, try your camera's burst mode if it has it... although it may not be the fastest on the market it will be an improvement over regular recovery time and might help you capture more of those instant shots.
Rechargeable batteries unfortunately start dying a little each time you use them, after as little as two or three charges they never return to a full charge.
The sports spectator mode is used for a quick shutter response, multi shots at 1.6fps, up to 16 consecutive frames, and the camera focuses at a middle distance.
The sports mode keeps the shutter-release button pressed to take a series of moving pictures 1.3fps for up to 14 frames. Both are great features.
On your dial select the sports figure and press menue, then select the figure on top right for the quick shutter response, or choose the left one for a series of moving pictures. Press OK to save selection.
Don't give up - this is a great little camera, just spend a little time with the manual and you'll see you made a good choice, & you'll get great pictures. I hope this helps, -Mary :)
Note: it was the SPEED (60X) that made the difference.. not the SIZE (2 GB).. I just happened to find a 2 GB card on sale for $38 Cdn.. cheap!
A high speed memory card will allow you to take photos in closer succession, based on your camera's limits. It will also allow for faster transfer to your hard drive through a USB connector.
Andrew
You can buy accessories for a Sony T10 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) directly on the manufacturer's website ( sonystyle.com/is-bin/INTERS... ). They even have a Ring Light ( sonystyle.com/is-bin/INTERS... ) for macro-photography (3.25" in Macro mode). The camera does not look to be compatible with a docking station, but does come with A/V USB connector cables for easy transfer.
Andrew
I noticed that you haven't marked any replies as the "best answer." Are you still looking for a reply? If so, I recommend you re-submit it on <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com"&... so it will have a better chance of being noticed. These days it looks like most questions are being answered within a few days. Good luck!
I had a T30 and found that when i used AUTO mode, skin tones tended to come out reddish/flushed, even when there was no justification for it. the only time skin tones came out *normal* was when i used program/iso mode and those pictures had noise in it. Not too pleasant. Compare that to CANON where skin tones tend to come out *normal*.
2)also what would cause the SONY cameras to have trouble focusing on a point when taking videos? has any tests been done on this?
3)Do all versions has optical zoom when taking video, or is it only the T30 which possesses this capability?
4) which one has the best flash range? can u recommend a SONY camera (even if its not any of the mentioned) that possesses a STRONG flash range?(above 11-15ft)
There are two ways to go about this. One is to find a camera with a rapid "recovery" time after each picture. I'm not sure what price range you're looking for or what other features you need, but as far as good recovery time goes one to look at is the Sony Cybershot T10 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), which has a between-shots time of about 1.6 seconds. The Cybershot T30 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) has the same recovery time but is more expensive.
Both of these cameras also do well with shutter lag time (the time between when you push the button and when the shot actually fires), which will also help you... they both clock in with around half a second of shutter lag, which is also definitely on the fast side in comparison to most cameras.
Keep in mind that if you're using flash the recovery time between photos will slow down considerably- that is pretty much universal no matter what camera you're using.
The other way to address your situation is to look for a camera with a good "continuous shooting mode," or "burst mode," which is a mode you can set the camera to so that it fires many shots in quick succession automatically, without you having to push the button each time. After the series of shots is over the camera will have to take a minute to process them, but this rapid-fire shooting is excellent for taking pictures of fast events like you described.
For good burst mode, the Canon EOS 20D ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) has gotten excellent reviews (it's on the pricey side though), and the Pentax Optio W20 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is a cheaper alternative that offers two burst modes. It averages anywhere from 1.3 to 3 frames per second depending on how high you set the resolution.
I hope that helps!
There is really no such thing as a digital camera with no delay between photos, but what you'll want to look for is one with a very short recovery time so that you can take photos almost immediately after each other. You'll also want one without much shutter lag- that is, the amount of time from when you push the button to when the photo actually snaps.
A few good ones to look at for those features are the Sony Cybershot T10 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )- or the T30 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), which is a little more advanced and expensive than the T10 in other ways, but measures about the same as far as speed. These have about 1.6 seconds between shots and about .4 seconds shutter lag- this is excellent in the world of digital cameras.
You can also get into extremely high-end cameras- like the Nikon D2X ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) that measure something like .25 seconds recovery time. But I'm not sure what price range you're looking at.
Do keep in mind either way that when the flash is on, any camera is going to slow down quite a bit... a 1.6 second recovery time may become something like 2.5 seconds instead.
I hope that helps somewhat.
That is a tricky question. If you want to just use the 56MB of storage, you need to change your settings on your image quality (P.Quality in your menu) to the lowest quality and the smallest size. This will obviously not give you the best pictures though. You might want to invest in a memory card for your device though. The Sony T10 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) supports up to a 4GB PRO Duo memory stick. Also, remember that any movies taken on the camera eat up memory as well.
Andrew
Have you thought about the Casio Exilim EX-Z10 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )? I have seen photos taken with this camera in low light, no flash (indoors as well as out) and was impressed by their clarity compared to other cameras. It is a 5 mp camera and has a movie mode with sound. I believe it's considered a very "beginner friendly" camera but it does also have full manual mode. It is also practically credit-card sized and snaps photos very fast without lag or down time. It might be worth a look.
Hope that helps!
The Sony T10 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is clocked with a time between photos of about 1.6 seconds. To give you an idea of comparison, the Nikon Coolpix S4 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) was clocked at 2.8 seconds between photos.
With the flash on, the shot-to-shot time of this camera slows to about 2.38 seconds, but compared to other cameras on the market that is still pretty quick.
Hope that helps!
Message was edited by: camera?
Message was edited by: camera?
Zaid
Zaid
-S7C has a wider range of ISOs available (50-1600 vs T30's 80-1000)
-S7C is smaller & lighter
-Different types of image stabilization offered
-A few different features
It seems that the image stabilization in the T30 is better- the S7C does have a gyro sensor and what they call Electronic Vibration Reduction, but the T30 has an optical stabilizer that is thought to be more effective. The S7C also seems to need a steadier hand- it is a little more sensitive to shaking. But unless you have real problems with camera blur this shouldn't be a make-or-break factor.
The S7C has a few nifty details- exposure correction technology, plus face recognition and in-camera red-eye reduction (all three designed to create good portraits). Not sure if you're interested in those, but they can be fun to have.
The T30 tends to have noisier images particularly at high ISOs.
The S7C seems to offer truer colors (particularly in white indoor lighting); the T30 has a tendency to oversaturate some tones (esp. blues) and doesn't perform as well in low light.
The S7C sometimes gets complaints for being 'too small'- i.e. hard to hold and control.
Between the two my personal choice is the S7C. For whatever reason, even with wireless, it seems to be cheaper than the Sony. Unless you have particular needs (anti-shake, super-durable camera, etc.) it sounds like a better all-around choice to me. Plus the wireless might be nice to have in the future.
I've been trying to convince myself that the S7c is what i need even though it is cheaper than the T30.
Thanks again!
And I agree- the 2.8 is excellent if you're looking for lots of control and options while shooting.
You are correct. I have no idea why I typed 2mb, I think I was looking at the memory card information on that one. I have seen the T10 reviewed as having 56 and 58mb memory built-in, and I am assuming that you own it so know for a fact that it is indeed 58. Thanks for the info!
Zaid:
What camera are you using that is having the problem? Due to the flash being close to the lens on some cameras some have more issues with this than others, and some red-eye functions are more effective than others too. This might also be something you can edit out with good photo software (although I know it's a lot better not to have it in the first place).
anyway the auto red eye function works great when i am at a distance but when i am very close to subject (my baby girl) I still get red eye on her! tried many options. any advice would be great!
-Minimize pupil dilation by putting the subject in the brightest part of the room- even when it's dark enough to use a flash, if there's a little light this can help. Basically the more ambient light in the room the better chance of avoiding red eye, so even if you do need a flash turn on as many lights as possible and stay near them when setting up the photo.
-Consider a photo editing software that has red-eye remover (I know Photoshop has this, I'm sure most of them do too). If you use it correctly this can really clean up portraits nicely.
-Try the nighttime setting mode. This sounds weird and it will give you some 'artistic' photos- but it tends to illuminate a larger area with the flash cutting down on the huge bounce off the subject's eyes. I have used it and gotten both good and bad results; it's worth experimenting. But make sure you hold the camera steady, this exposure is very prone to shaking.
-See if you can turn down the flash intensity. Not sure if the S7C allows this, but play around with the flash set-up menu and see if any of the options result in a lesser flash.
-Move closer to the subject than you think you need to. Distance of the flash from the lens is what can cause red eye- it affects the angle of the light. Rule of thumb= measure the distance from the center of your flash to the center of the lens. If it is 2 inches, then stay within 2 feet of your subject. For every inch add a foot.
Hope some of those help.
The Sony DSC-T10 ( sigmund.digitalcamera-hq.co... ), for instance, which is Digital Camera HQ's top choice in the Ultra Compact category, has a flash range of 9 feet and even up to 15 feet at an ISO setting of 1000. It's got 7 megapixels and a 2.5" LCD screen.
Good luck-
Thanks
i would recommend CANON over SONY though. CANONs always take better pictures. look at this sd550 example -- all taken indoors at a club. some taken without flash and on ISO 400, others taken at ISO 100 with slow synchro flash. no Image Stablization.
<a href="underwatermissions.com/gall...
Plus if the 'Open Mic Nights' are in low light conditions that could be a big problem for a digital camera in video mode.
But if you need the still camera for other things and just want one with some video and sound capabilities the Sony T10 is better but still not great especially with the sound.
Nikon got a late start in the digital camera business, and their older models were, eh, not so great. But recent models are getting good reviews from users, for example the Nikon S6 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ).
Sony got an early start in the consumer oriented cameras, and have had a lot of winners. Their latest hotshots are the H5 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) , the Sony T10 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) and their new SLR, the Sony Alpha a100 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) all seem like great products.
Sony is new to the still photography industry and has to improve its products for taking professional quality photographs
Sony Cybershot DSC-T10 Reviews
Sony Cybershot DSC-T10 Reviews by Digital Camera-HQ Users
- 4.0 out of 5
My "little" camera. Great for fitting in my purse or pocket when going places that I don't want to bring the big gun to.
- 5.0 out of 5
this camera is awesome i like the touch screen and the smile shuter that auto maticly takes the subjects picture when the subject smile and the paint thing that you can ddecorate the pic What a great camera
- 4.0 out of 5
I am not a picky or negative buyer. I like to focus on the positive and remember that what I buy is not going to be perfect. There are always going to be things that could make a product better and I know that manufacturers aren't going to get eveything right (Otherwise they would be freaks of nature).
The Sony Cyber-shot Super SteadyShot DSC-T10 has been a great camera for me. This is the first Digital Camera I have owned and I love it. When I bought it my only request was that I have a camera that was easy to operate and gave me steady shots without the use of a tripod; it has done that for me. It takes clear pictures even when shaking around like you're on a bucking bull.
The downsides are that there are mysterious white spots in some of the pictures (dust particles I have learned) and the red eye reduction doesn't always work. But the mysterious white spots don't bother me much, and there are so many ways to reduce and elliminate red eye at developer locations or on the computer that red eye isn't an issue.
This camera does it for me and I have great memories to prove it!
- 2.0 out of 5
I loved this camera at first. Until I realized that the red eye problems were not because I didn't know how to use the camera. I have a young child and this camera is not useful for any flash photos of people. I will never buy another cybershot and will recommend to anyone listening-DO NOT BUY THIS CAMERA!
- 1.0 out of 5
This has got to be the worst camera made by Sony, mine has has to be repaired twice already and the unit has these terrible white spots on photos taken with the flash (this is supposedly not a problem according to Sony!!!!!) Dont buy, go for a Canon or basically any other brand that might give a s—t about there products.
- 1.0 out of 5
At first I was very glad with my T10. I was amazed when I got actions shots that were clear. Taking pictures with children running around and jumping with clear pictures were great, until I discovered that there were some shots that have this mysterious white spots. I thought my lens might have been just dirty. Until I tried to search the internet to find out that this is a common problem with the T10. Thanks to this site I discovered that this was due to the dust particles in the air that got reflected by the flash. According to the sony website this is not a malfunction. My sentiments on this is .... Does that mean I will have to check everytime if there will be dust particles in the air before I take a shot? How come other camera brands do not have this problem? Do not tell me that there are no dust in the air everytime we take a shot using other cameras. This is actually very disappointing from Sony. I was actually expecting that they have a very good quality product. But to allow something like a white spot in some pictures to get away and just post that this is not a malfunction, is very very disappointing. We saw a sample of T9 and it was great so we thought T10 would be much better. We should have stick to our original decision to get a T9. Better yet, we should have stick to our old brand.
- 2.0 out of 5
I have had this camera for 4 months and I am at the point where I am exhausted from having to go back to my pictures and clean up the red eyes. I called sony for some help and the technician told me that the red eye is from being to close and to tell my subjects not to look into the camera. He could not even tell me how close is too close! I usally take pictures from 4-6 feet away and all my other cameras worked great from that distance. I bought the camera to be the quick point and shoot camera that it is. So I hate to spend so much time cleaning up my images. I have had great results with cybershot cameras that I owned in the past- but I am sorely disappointed with this one. If you were unfortunate enough to buy this camera then you will be restricted to (great) landscape phots and candid shots.
- 4.0 out of 5
it is a wonderful piece of artifact but, the japanese model (which I own) doesn't have the english language menu...and his bug on monitor image disappearing after a couple of weeks using it, it is not recognized abroad as a free replacement fix. :-\
- 4.0 out of 5
This camera is a great!!!When my sister uses it she never gets red eyes but for some reason when I use it it does not get great results indoors..maybe because I have small children and they like to switch the modes.
- 1.0 out of 5
I own a white T10 and strange grey dots appeared below the coating of the slider after using for a month. Those dots can't be felt so it couldn't be scratches as what the technician claimed to be. After changing the slider, those dots appeared again after 2 months. He said those dots are caused by the pouch which is totally ridiculous as i use sony cybershot pouch. I spent $800+ buying the camera and its accessories and I am totally disappointed in sony which promises stylish and quality products. I'll discourage anyone from buying sony's products.
- 3.0 out of 5
I am using this camera since last 3 months.
I have captured more than 2000 snaps from this,
only red eye is a problem with this.
otherwise it is best.
- 1.0 out of 5
the sony t10 is an absolute disappointment in terms of its picture quality, extreme red eyes, blurry pictures and terrible photos in the night. i spent a good lot of money on this camera and believe me; my first camera i bought for mere INR 2K was much better in terms of results. This camera has really made me full of regrets on my decision. Please do not buy this at all.
- 3.0 out of 5
For daytime pics, this camerais excellent. The video capabilities are great and battery life is also great. The main problem in white spots on some pics, bad blurring, and lowsy nightime photos. Look for cameras w/image stabilizer instead of this...
- 5.0 out of 5
Ive had my sony T10 for 3 weeks now and have had no problems with taking pictures outside or inside. I was worried to get it after reading reviews that mentioned this camera produces red-eye, but it was already being delivered to my home. All the pictures i have taken have come out crisp and clear, i don't even get those white spots that some people have mentioned. If you want a great camera that's also a good price go for this one, mines been perfect!
- 3.0 out of 5
This is such a horrible camera to own. Every person has a obvious red eye problem. All my pictures are ruined. You have to slide the opening to take a shot. Without any case, it keeps slipping open and now the camera lense is scratched. All my photos turned out blurry. It's too easy to accidentally have your finger cover the lense. argh
- 1.0 out of 5
Every picture with a person has red eye. I cannot understand why a camera so expensive and well receieved could allow this error. No matter the time of day the red eye still attacks. All my photos came out super blurry and fuzzy. My fingers block the ill-placed lense. I have to open and close the lense cover all the time. If you leave it in your purse without a case, the lense cover will magically open. This happened so many times that my lense got scratched. Don't listen to the hype and reviews. This is one camera that loves to chew your pictures with Red Eyes.
- 4.0 out of 5
i have using it for last 2 months results are good
easy to use
- 5.0 out of 5
After trying to find a replacement camera and after many different opinions from sales persons and after exchanging five different cameras I selected the sony t10, no competition as far as I was concerned. Everything was there, the price the quality, the simpleness of the camera I was hooked. I would tell you try all the cameras until you find what suits you, the image stabilisation is just great and pictures clear and crisp, also navigating is really easy, I am a 100% SATISFIED CLIENT !!!
- 1.0 out of 5
I've had this camera for 2 weeks. Unfortunately I used it for all my Christmas photos. Most photos have white spots from the flash (75%). When flash his not in use, white spots don't appear. Problems with blurry pictures, even with it's so-called "super steady shot" which would tell me there was too much camera vibration even when it was sitting on something! Terrible red eye problems as well. Will be returning to Best Buy even though I will have to pay their unbelievable 15% (over $50) restocking fee.
- 2.0 out of 5
I thought this would be a great camera since it is small and sleek and quick to use. I took it to a wedding yesterday and all the indoor pics had extreme red-eye and some pics had white circles which happened the other day too. Its aweful and ruins the pictures. The red-eye is not correctable in sony program b/c it just makes their eyes gray. I'm returning it a.s.a.p!
- 1.0 out of 5
I purchased the T10 to replace the T9 I gave to my daughter. What a shock, the camera is terrible!!! The photos are very soft in focus and the indoor photos are extremely grainy. I also experienced the mysterious white circles on some of my photos. This was the third cy-bershot I have owned. I returned it to best buy and found an old T9 and I'm so happy with the sharpness of my photos and the overall quality improvements. Find yourself a T9!!!
- 1.0 out of 5
My girlfriend just gave me for my bithday a T-10 and I can say as many other reviewers here how frustrated i am with the camera. I have sent an email to sony saying to them the problem everybody has .... RED EYES, but not red eyes. It's incredible, people in the photos look like living in HELL. If flash is off, DONT MOVE, because phantoms will appear... sony sony .... what have you done???
- 2.0 out of 5
i was attracted to this camera because of its size, that i can through it in my pocket anywhere and as an upgrade in megapixel for my ex sony one which was 5 megapixel but really was awsome. so, this t10 really dissapointed me ,as all my indoor photos had lot of white spots everywhere, i changed it maybe 4 or 5 times by same model, but same problem always. iwas really dissapointed and i compared its photos with my old one. oooohhh, what a difference. at last i sold it after 4 month and i lost about 35% of my money.
pleeeeeeaaaaase don't buy this camera
- 5.0 out of 5
SD card cameras are useless when it
repeatedly shows error message.This was my pass problem
Ever since I use Sony memory stick and I have no problem and even works with my PSP.
Does produce several very nice pictures and I love the Lens that does not extend like others do.So far this is my best digital camera.
- 2.0 out of 5
Almost every picture that is shot with flash (red eye reduction or not) the person as red eye. It is extremely frustrating. I have had other slim cameras and did not have this problem. It is defective in my view. Do not buy this camera.
- 5.0 out of 5
I just purchased this camera a few days ago and have taken at least 500 shots! It is amazing indoors and out. I have read the articles here on the extreme red eye and I have to say, I have taken tons of pictures inside....with and without the flash and haven't experienced any red eye... I even after reading these articles took a few shots of myself in the dark and I could actually see the color of my eyes come through and they are dark...NO RED at all??? Anyway...this camera has produced amazing pictures for me - I purchased the Black unit and LOVE IT and all it does!
- 1.0 out of 5
The size of this camera is great. The picture clarity, if taken in the daylight is great. However, unless you like red-eye pictures do not purchase this camera. This camera is the biggest disappointment. I purchased a Sony cybershot three years ago and it was great, never had any issues but unfortunately my son broke it so I had to purchase a new one. I did lots of research, read the available reviews and finally decided to purchase the new DSC-T10, "one of the best ones out there". Well I do not agree and neither will you. I have called Sony at least three times to receive help on how to remove the red-eye from my pictures and their only suggestions is to use the red-eye reduction feature, which does not work! I use it every time and I still get red-eye. Their other suggestion is to tell the people to look away from the camera...well it still happens. I am so disappointed in this camera. I can't believe I spent $350+ for this camera and it is the quality it is. I'm ready to give it away I'm so frustrated. One other thing if you like to use the date stamp then you'll need to purchase either a docking station for your computer or purchase their additional software because if you take your memory stick to a store to print out your pictures then the date stamp will not print on them. Neither will it do it if you use an internet site like snapfish.com or kodakgallery.com. The biggest disappointment!
- 2.0 out of 5
I have owned this camera for 2 months and I am very unhappy with my indoor shots due to extreme red eye. The red eye is so bad that none of my photo editing software is able to repair the red eye in my photos. I have 2 other Sony cameras so when I shopped for a more compact camera, I bought Sony. My dad bought a Canon SD630 compact and he does not have this problem. Other than the red eye problems, I love the camera. However, the red eye problem is so bad that I now wish that I had purchased the Canon.
- 5.0 out of 5
this camera is bombs dot com and everyone thinks i have the coolest camera ever!
- 2.0 out of 5
I have an earlier version of the Sony Cyber Shot and this was an upgrade . I was very excited to take some pictures of my grandson with this camera . Right out of the box this camera did not perform . Every shot that I took of him indoors had extreme redeye.
- 2.0 out of 5
The camera left 'flash' (faded white circle) spots in various locations on my pictures. The spots did not appear if the flash is not on, but you need the flash most of the time you take indoor pictures. The 'flash spots' continued in a variety of settings and lighting. I exchange the camera for a new one becuase I thought it was an isolated problem. The same problem occured on the new camera. I called sony and they told me that this happens on the t series cameras due to dust particles in the air?
- 3.0 out of 5
after my t9's screen got broken I decided to get the t10 was it looked just the same and fitted in the case my sony R1 and as it has a higher pixel count and had a zoom on the video record function, i thought i couldn;t loose!.....er ....wrong!
My only complaint is a biggy as far as I'm concerned.
The reason that I carry a quality compact with my R1 is that they are great for quick snaps that arnt possible with a prosumer model like the r1, but....
The time it takes to store images at the highest resolution is plainly ridiculous indeed borderline comedy whilst photographing fireworks as by the time it has stored 1 image you have seen another dozen go off and this is just not good enough!
If I was going to but again i would be looking around for an old stock t9 and save a good amount of cash, especially as the t9 and the t10's on screen and printed images are virtually impossible to tell apart
- 5.0 out of 5
the sony dsc t10 is a classy digital camera it is has good sizes and it distinguishes it self from all other didigal cameras by it sleek look and its crisp pictures if u try it once u are going to buy it is smooth.
- 5.0 out of 5
I love using my T10. Its sleek style and compact size are perfect for my on the go lifestyle. And the digital pictures are top notch too!
- 4.0 out of 5
good picture quality, gr8 anti blurr tech, sleek.
over all a good pacakge from sony.. user frendly..