Sony Cybershot T100
Sony Cybershot T100
Hey! You should know that this product has been discontinued. Here are our current recommended cameras in the Consumer dSLR category.
Sony Cybershot T100
Editor's Review
This ultra stylish addition to Sony's Cybershot line features a slim metal body available in a range of color options. The Sony T100 uses the same BIONZ image processor used in Sony's DSLR A100 model, allowing for optimized photo quality with low noise levels and realistic color. A Carl Zeiss Vario-Tessar zoom lens provides 5x optical zoom. This camera looks like a worthy upgrade for Cybershot
lovers- it features High Definition Smart shooting and output, Super Steady Shot and High Sensitivity to decrease image blur, Face Detection, and an extra-large LCD. All this in a super-slim and stylish body that is less than half an inch thick!
Specifications
- 8.1 megapixels
- 5x optical zoom / 6x digital zoom
- Auto focus and exposure
- JPEG file format
- ISO 80-3200
- Lithium ion battery
- 3 inch LCD
- Memory Stick / Pro Duo storage (31MB internal)
- HD Sensitive / HD output capability
- Release Date: Feb 28, 2007
Shop for T100 Accessories
Sony Cybershot T100 Comments & Questions (write your own!)
With the sony T100 can i shoot a black and white shot with red sections in it? Example all black and white but lips red (kristie1978 — 09/27/2007)
reply to this comment
Matt (09/28/2007)
This camera doesn't have the color accent feature to change only one color. But, what you can do is just color the lips in post-processing. But in-camera, I'm afraid not.
reply to this comment
Which one is better T100 or W90....? Please Clearify. (kkdpk — 09/07/2007)
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (09/07/2007)
for comparison, you may want to check out this resource ( imaging-resource.com/IMCOMP... ). It takes pictures with each and you can compare them side by side. I was able to compare the T100 with a previous W80 model and I found that the T100 has a far better macro setting, more natural colors and a sharper image, IMHO. Now, the W90 may have made some improvements, but enough? They're pretty close as is.
reply to this comment
In comparing the T100 against Sony's W200 in the store, the T100 had MUCH sharper images. Is this due to the OPTICAL zoom being higher on the T100, ( (RADIOCITY — 08/13/2007)
Is this due to the higher 5X OPTICAL zoom of the T100, or the double the resolution of the T100's screen compared to the W200? I couldn't PRINT the pictures in the store, but the T100 sure looked to give a much clearer image when viewed on the screen. Bottom line....which camera gives the best picture quality, the 8mp or the 12mp? I feel an OPTICAL zoom is always superior, but the W200 does have 12mp! Tough choice.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (08/13/2007)
I'd beware of how a picture looks in the LCD screen. The true proof in the pudding is the MP. However, the fact is that you won't really see a difference in quality from 8mp-12mp in simple snapshots or even enlargements up to 8x10. Above that, the MP difference will really start to be noticeable.
But 99% of your pictures will be below 8x10, so for me, I'd go for the better optical zoom over a 12mp chip.
reply to this comment
But 99% of your pictures will be below 8x10, so for me, I'd go for the better optical zoom over a 12mp chip.
Rich Watson (08/13/2007)
Hi Bob,
An LCD with double the resolution is going to be remarkably clearer than the one that has half of that.
ZOOM VS. MP:
A doubling of the zoom means that the resolution is equivalent to the SQUARE of the MP. In your comparison, 5/3 = 1.67; the square of 1.67 = 2.78. So if the MPs were identical, then the T100 would have 2.78 times the resolution of the W200. BUT...since the W200 has 12MP instead of 8MP, this 2.78 is reduced: 8/12*(2.78) = 1.86. Therefore, the T100 has 1.86 times the actual resolution of the W200. This is a no brainer, the T100 is better on both counts, i.e., the LCD screen AND the actual resolution. Go with the T100.
reply to this comment
An LCD with double the resolution is going to be remarkably clearer than the one that has half of that.
ZOOM VS. MP:
A doubling of the zoom means that the resolution is equivalent to the SQUARE of the MP. In your comparison, 5/3 = 1.67; the square of 1.67 = 2.78. So if the MPs were identical, then the T100 would have 2.78 times the resolution of the W200. BUT...since the W200 has 12MP instead of 8MP, this 2.78 is reduced: 8/12*(2.78) = 1.86. Therefore, the T100 has 1.86 times the actual resolution of the W200. This is a no brainer, the T100 is better on both counts, i.e., the LCD screen AND the actual resolution. Go with the T100.
by James DeRuvo (08/13/2007)
Richio, fantastic math nothwithstanding, that's rather misleading. Sure, by the numbers, it has double the MP. But do you NOTICE in a basic 4x6 snapshot? No. You don't. And as such, you pay more for something you won't be able to appreciate or take advantage of 99% of the time.
However, if that 1% of enlargements makes the difference, then I agree with you, go with the T100.
But a Porche has a much faster engine than a VW, but at 35mph, you can't tell, can you? And if you live in the city, it's not going to matter.
reply to this comment
However, if that 1% of enlargements makes the difference, then I agree with you, go with the T100.
But a Porche has a much faster engine than a VW, but at 35mph, you can't tell, can you? And if you live in the city, it's not going to matter.
Rich Watson (08/14/2007)
Well, actually, James, you just re-agreed with yourself as well, since you recommended the T100 in your first response to the question (and the T100 actually has the smaller number of megapixels!) So I reiterate, I recommend the T100 (with 8MP) over the W200 (with 12MP).
It is true that a person wanting only 4x6 prints could get by with fewer megapixels; even 4MP might be overkill for that usage. I used to get fine 4x6 prints from a 2MP camera I have. However, nowhere did BigBob say he was only using 4x6's, so the point about 4x6 prints is moot.
By the way, I'm not sure why you consider multiplication and division "fantastic math". :)
reply to this comment
It is true that a person wanting only 4x6 prints could get by with fewer megapixels; even 4MP might be overkill for that usage. I used to get fine 4x6 prints from a 2MP camera I have. However, nowhere did BigBob say he was only using 4x6's, so the point about 4x6 prints is moot.
By the way, I'm not sure why you consider multiplication and division "fantastic math". :)
by James DeRuvo (08/15/2007)
Well of course I agree with myself, Richio! LOL. The thing is that 99% of all pictures are going to fall into the 4x6 to 5x7 range. Max 8x10. It's just overkill to go with a 12MP camera. And when you consider that only 20% of people actually PRINT their pictures, even more so, IMHO.
As for your math - I was complimenting you! ;)
reply to this comment
As for your math - I was complimenting you! ;)
Rich Watson (08/15/2007)
Thanks,
Incidentally, where is BIGBOB?
reply to this comment
Incidentally, where is BIGBOB?
RADIOCITY (08/15/2007)
Thanks guys, they were both good answers, but I think Richio expressed it best in terms I appreciate. I wasn't aware of the zoom/megapixels realtionship. I'm an old 35mm slr & photographic developer just trying to upgrade from my Sony 2mp p&s. Which, by the way, does indeed take nice 4x6's. That new Sony 200 was at the top of my list (I do on occasion blow up a pic to 8x10) because of the 12mp, but some reviews have discussed 'noise' in the pc at high def & dig. zoom. I've always felt an optical zoom was the best way to zoom anyway. And, as you pointed out, and as I witnessed in store, the T100's 3 inch lcd is twice as nice as the 200, with a much brighter display for outside viewing.
Thanks again to the both of you for your input. Now if it only took AA's.....
reply to this comment
Thanks again to the both of you for your input. Now if it only took AA's.....
Rich Watson (08/15/2007)
Thanks for the award.
RE enlargements: I took a great snapshot of my cat, with a Canon A520 (only 4MP). But I took it in and had it blown up to 11x14---(no cropping!) and I couldn't see any pixels. Then it sold at an art show for $75.
reply to this comment
RE enlargements: I took a great snapshot of my cat, with a Canon A520 (only 4MP). But I took it in and had it blown up to 11x14---(no cropping!) and I couldn't see any pixels. Then it sold at an art show for $75.
by James DeRuvo (08/15/2007)
Richio gives good advice, even though we disagree from time to time, I never cease to learn from him. The points are well earned.
reply to this comment
Rich Watson (08/15/2007)
Hey BIGBOB and James,
The fact that the resolution increase via a zoom is proportional to the SQUARE of the same increase in the MP is similar to the f-stop scheme. For example, as you know, f16 is a smaller diameter than f8. BUT....f16 lets in only 1/4 as much light as f8, not 1/2 as much. The next notch in the f-scale is f11---because the formula for the area of a circle is (pi)r[squared]. IE, a circle that is twice the diameter of a smaller circle, has FOUR times the area, and thus the squaring factor comes into play with both f-stops AND zoom.
Another way to look at it: the f-number is just the ratio of the focal length/the lens size (diameter). So, if you double your focal length by zooming from 100mm to 200mm, you have just doubled the f-stop number, say f4 to f8. And as you know, that would decrease the light to 1/4, but also increase the resolution by 4.
Rich
reply to this comment
The fact that the resolution increase via a zoom is proportional to the SQUARE of the same increase in the MP is similar to the f-stop scheme. For example, as you know, f16 is a smaller diameter than f8. BUT....f16 lets in only 1/4 as much light as f8, not 1/2 as much. The next notch in the f-scale is f11---because the formula for the area of a circle is (pi)r[squared]. IE, a circle that is twice the diameter of a smaller circle, has FOUR times the area, and thus the squaring factor comes into play with both f-stops AND zoom.
Another way to look at it: the f-number is just the ratio of the focal length/the lens size (diameter). So, if you double your focal length by zooming from 100mm to 200mm, you have just doubled the f-stop number, say f4 to f8. And as you know, that would decrease the light to 1/4, but also increase the resolution by 4.
Rich
Rich Watson (08/15/2007)
Thanks for the nice compliment, James.
reply to this comment
How do you shoot through a glass window on sunny day so that you can eliminate the glare on the picture? (Aries — 08/11/2007)
reply to this comment
Rich Watson (08/11/2007)
Only with a polarizing filter, available if a camera has filter screws on the lens (typically SLR models).
reply to this comment
skater (09/04/2007)
i recently went to the zoo and was trying to work this out and i figured if you obviosly use no flash and then push the lens right up against the glass you will get the best photos. hope it helps :)
reply to this comment
Rich Watson (09/05/2007)
I suppose one could also purchase a screw-on filter, and simply hold it up against the camera lens (if you don't have an SLR or other camera with the threads).
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (09/08/2007)
Some cameras do have a "shooting behind glass" preset feature. The Olympus SP500UZ does. You may want to check your presets for the option.
reply to this comment
Rich Watson (09/09/2007)
Gee, James, how does that option work, anyway? Is it supposed to cut down on glare?
reply to this comment
Chris Wood (10/05/2007)
I just put my sunglasses in front of the lens for a makeshift polarising filter if absolutely necessary. This doesn't really work if the sunglasses are too dark or overtly curved though.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (10/05/2007)
Another option is to position yourself at a slight angle. As for how it works, Richio, I can't seem to find any hard data on it, not even from Olympus. If I had to guess, I'd say it alters the fstop to make the reflection less noticeable?
reply to this comment
Best camara among Panasonic TZ3 and Sony T100 (Pratap — 08/01/2007)
Panasonic TZ3 vs Sony t100
reply to this comment
John Ml. (08/02/2007)
Depends on what you really want. If you want a compact camera with a terrific zoom (10x) and very useful wide angle lens (28mm) the TZ3 is the way to go. Now if you want an Ultra compact camera to carry in your pocket, the T100 is your camera. Both will do good in bright light, but won't do good in low light.
For its features, i would choose the TZ3, is great to have a good zoom and the wide angle will help you to get everyone or everything in the picture.
reply to this comment
For its features, i would choose the TZ3, is great to have a good zoom and the wide angle will help you to get everyone or everything in the picture.
Pratap (08/03/2007)
I am looking for Good Image quality and I would like to take photos in both indoor and outdoor. I don't mind of high compact and don't want to keep in pocket. So As per image quality which is the best one.
reply to this comment
John Ml. (08/03/2007)
If you want High image quality which is capable in bright and low light conditions, the Fujifilm F series (Finepix F20, F31fd or F40fd) is your best option for compact. Fujifilm F50fd is on its way but can not recommend this camera yet.
If you want a bridge camera with long zoom i recommend you to look at Fujifilm S6000, Canon S3 or S5, and Sony H5. The Fujifilm will give the best IQ, best low light performance and has wide angle lens too, but Long zoom is usable only in bright light. The Canon and Sony have IS which help the long zoom in any condition, but are not good in low light so they will depend a lot on the flash range.
reply to this comment
If you want a bridge camera with long zoom i recommend you to look at Fujifilm S6000, Canon S3 or S5, and Sony H5. The Fujifilm will give the best IQ, best low light performance and has wide angle lens too, but Long zoom is usable only in bright light. The Canon and Sony have IS which help the long zoom in any condition, but are not good in low light so they will depend a lot on the flash range.
I have to choose between Sony T100, N2, Canon SD 850 IS and Canon SD 750. Which one is the best ? (animou — 07/12/2007)
Please rank the 4 mentioned cameras on their overall performance.
reply to this comment
MATT (07/13/2007)
With price being no object . . .It's hard not to strongly recommend the Sony T100 as being the best combination of zoom, large LCD screen, image stabilization and most importantly picture quality. The only negative to the camera is the lack of an optical viewfinder. If an optical viewfinder is an important feature for you, the SD850 is an OUTSTANDING camera although its LCD is smaller and the zoom is less than the T100. The N2 is a "cool" camera but the novelty of the touch screen will probably wear off pretty fast. Also, its very hard to recommend the SD750 over the T100 as the T100 offers image stabilization and greater zoom.
If price is an issue, the SD750 is an excellent value for less than $300.
reply to this comment
If price is an issue, the SD750 is an excellent value for less than $300.
Confused between Sony W80 and Sony T100, which one to choose? (puneetdua — 07/11/2007)
I am looking for a small,sleek camera , and having Sony T100 and SonY W80 in my mind, So can you please tell which one to choose between these two keeping some thoughts for Bad review of Sony cameras for shots in Low lightsand value for Money?
reply to this comment
MATT (07/13/2007)
It's hard to beat the W80 as a value for the money. The T100 is a very advanced compact camera giving you a larger zoom and LCD than the W80. If price is not a big factor, than by all means go with the T100. If you are simply looking for the most bang for your buck the W80 is a BARGAIN at $250 with the Bionz image processer and optical image stablization.
reply to this comment
puneetdua (07/13/2007)
hi Matt
Thanks for your reply, i agree with your answer... :) can you please tell me about the performence of both the cameras in Low light or Night shots..!!
reply to this comment
Thanks for your reply, i agree with your answer... :) can you please tell me about the performence of both the cameras in Low light or Night shots..!!
MATT (07/13/2007)
Most compact cameras will have some difficulty in low light. Reasons being, the lenses don't let in a large amount of light due to their size. The small CCD's don't allow you to really use the high ISO settings without getting a lot of noise in your picture. Best advice for night shots is some form of small tripod or a DSLR camera with a fast lens on a tripod. I believe the T100 may have a slightly more powerful flash but I am not for certain. Hope this helps.
reply to this comment
puneetdua (07/13/2007)
thanks Matt..actually before your second reply i bought that..T100 & i guess will not let me down after some good money..:) ..again thaks for you nice replies..!!
reply to this comment
I have to Choose between Sony T-100 and Canon SD800IS. Which one is better? (tuhinsinha — 07/06/2007)
I have used SONY cameras before and the only problem that they have is getting night/twilight shots. The images take too long to process and are blurred in the end.
Does Canon cameras overcome this problem or not??
reply to this comment
Does Canon cameras overcome this problem or not??
Brenda Paro (07/06/2007)
SD800 IS, in my opinion, is the better choice. The image stabilization works better than Sony's (which will help with those low light blurred shots) and it also has a stronger flash. Plus the wide angle lens is gorgeous.
reply to this comment
kristine (12/22/2007)
eeiw.. SOny is better than any other brands.. and take note: it's a touch screen digiCam.. hello!it even drives me crazy!i'm craving to own it!hush.. Sony is the best for me!love t so much..
reply to this comment
How is the LCD screen in bright sunlight and in low light? (seahorse08 — 06/22/2007)
On my present Sony DSC-S75 I cannot see anything on the LCD in bright sunlight. So I need to use the optical viewfinder. Since the T100 does not have a viewfinder, if bright sunlight is an issue I would not consider buying this camera.
Likewise, how is the LCD in low light?
reply to this comment
Likewise, how is the LCD in low light?
Andrew Skinner (06/23/2007)
Irene,
I would say this camera's LCD will be fine in low light. In bright light, you'll probably have issues. You can purchase covers that shade the LCD of some cameras, but I can't find one for this camera.
Andrew
reply to this comment
I would say this camera's LCD will be fine in low light. In bright light, you'll probably have issues. You can purchase covers that shade the LCD of some cameras, but I can't find one for this camera.
Andrew
seahorse08 (06/23/2007)
Thanks, Andrew. I was also thinking that a shade, but couldn't find one. Thinking of how I could make one myself - haven't come up with an answer yet.
In the meantime, I found a Nikon Coolpix S10 that has a swivel-body where the lens can be set at an angle to get the picture wanted while the LCD can be angled away from the brightest light. I'm considering this camera instead of the Sony T100. Are you familiar with this Nikon?
Thanks, Irene
reply to this comment
In the meantime, I found a Nikon Coolpix S10 that has a swivel-body where the lens can be set at an angle to get the picture wanted while the LCD can be angled away from the brightest light. I'm considering this camera instead of the Sony T100. Are you familiar with this Nikon?
Thanks, Irene
Andrew Skinner (06/23/2007)
Irene,
I've used a Coolpix before, just not this one. They are easy to use, and the swivel lens function would definitely get you a better angle for the LCD screen. the 10x optical zoom is cool on the Nikon S10 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) as well.
Andrew
reply to this comment
I've used a Coolpix before, just not this one. They are easy to use, and the swivel lens function would definitely get you a better angle for the LCD screen. the 10x optical zoom is cool on the Nikon S10 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) as well.
Andrew
seahorse08 (06/23/2007)
Thanks again, Andrew. I just ordered the Nikon before I went to my hotmail.
Irene
reply to this comment
Irene
Andrew Skinner (06/24/2007)
reply to this comment
Michael J. Sawczak Jr. (12/04/2007)
Delkin devices makes a very good pop-up shade for the T-100 (Universal Pop-Up Shade for 3.0" LCDs Model Number: DU3.0-M ) I have one, and as a bonus, it comes with a screen protector. The protector with the mounting frame mounts to the camera via an adhesive strip, and the actual pop-up hood slides on to the bracket which is great since you can remove it for indoor shots and the protector remains in place. On the Delkin website you will find it along with a whole bunch of other accessories for your cameras.
reply to this comment
cybeshit t1000 (lance bass — 05/12/2010)
You obviously don't know WTF your talking about.
reply to this comment
ella (02/29/2008)
How can I see the screen in bright sunlight--i'm uisng C613 Kodak camera
reply to this comment
How does the Sony T100 do in indoor/low light and night shots? (mtjuju39 — 06/21/2007)
I am very interested in the Sony T100, but I have seen a huge difference in websites regarding its ability to take low light and night shots. Can someone give me the real scoop on how it handles low light situations?
reply to this comment
Brenda Paro (06/22/2007)
Jennifer,
I've heard lots of conflicting opinions on this, too, but the majority of reviews I've read have said it handles poorly in low light. I don't own it, but I have tested it out, and the problem I ran into was this: when you set it to Auto, and then shoot in low light (without flash), it tends to kick up the ISO higher than you want it to. It is trying to compensate for the low light, but it overcompensates and the photos are grainier than they should be. I'd rather have some shadow in my photos than wash-out and grain. You can get around this by taking it off Auto mode, using P mode and setting the ISO, lowering the EV, etc., but I'll admit it- I'm lazy and sometimes I like to shoot in Auto! If you're the same way then I'd recommend something else for good low light shots.
reply to this comment
I've heard lots of conflicting opinions on this, too, but the majority of reviews I've read have said it handles poorly in low light. I don't own it, but I have tested it out, and the problem I ran into was this: when you set it to Auto, and then shoot in low light (without flash), it tends to kick up the ISO higher than you want it to. It is trying to compensate for the low light, but it overcompensates and the photos are grainier than they should be. I'd rather have some shadow in my photos than wash-out and grain. You can get around this by taking it off Auto mode, using P mode and setting the ISO, lowering the EV, etc., but I'll admit it- I'm lazy and sometimes I like to shoot in Auto! If you're the same way then I'd recommend something else for good low light shots.
mtjuju39 (06/22/2007)
Thank you Brenda P! I feel the same way you do about a little shadow vs a grainy picture. With all the computer editing software out there I can touch up the shadows, but if it was taken as grainy I can't do much to help that out. This was the answer I was looking for!
reply to this comment
Brenda Paro (06/22/2007)
You're very welcome. It's a good little camera, but if low light is what you're looking for I would stay away on that front. Let me know if you need help finding something a little more suitable, or if you have further questions!
reply to this comment
mtjuju39 (06/22/2007)
Hi Brenda, I do have a question on finding something more suitable, which I understand could prove to be very difficult to answer. I currently own a Fuji E550, 6.3mp, 4X/4X. The clarity and versatility of this camera has been wonderful, drawbacks are low light, maybe more zoom and some blurred pictures for my children in action conditions. So I've been looking at compact cameras with Optical Image Stabilization (which has driven me away from Fuji, until they get OIS) and I am intrigued by Face Detection technology. In your opinion, is Face Detection really worth it or is it an option that has some kinks that needs to be worked out and there are better OIS options right now that should not be overlooked? Thank you for your time!!
reply to this comment
Brenda Paro (06/27/2007)
Hi Jennifer,
You're definitely on the right track with OIS if what you're trying to do is eliminate blur in low light. Fast moving subjects will still be blurred, as the OIS can't stop the subject, it can just steady your camera. But OIS is still an excellent thing to have, especially if you shoot low light.
The face detection technology CAN be really good- it sort of depends on the camera as well as on the type of photos you're taking. Just as some cameras have issues locking auto focus at times, the face detection isn't foolproof and some cameras have issues catching the right part of the photo for the technology to really do its job. Is there a certain camera you're considering?
reply to this comment
You're definitely on the right track with OIS if what you're trying to do is eliminate blur in low light. Fast moving subjects will still be blurred, as the OIS can't stop the subject, it can just steady your camera. But OIS is still an excellent thing to have, especially if you shoot low light.
The face detection technology CAN be really good- it sort of depends on the camera as well as on the type of photos you're taking. Just as some cameras have issues locking auto focus at times, the face detection isn't foolproof and some cameras have issues catching the right part of the photo for the technology to really do its job. Is there a certain camera you're considering?
mtjuju39 (06/28/2007)
Hi Brenda and thank you for your time!
I've been considering a lot of cameras, mainly Canon because of the Optical Image Stabilization and all the positive reviews. I will mainly be using the camera as a take everywhere camera to capture my family on the go. I am very interested in Face Detection and the camera must be able to perform well anywhere at anytime, meaning crisp and clear shots inside, outside, day or night. I am really sorry to admit I have not been impressed with side by side test images between multiple point and shoot Canon products and a Fuji F30 on some professional review sites. The Sony DSC T100 faired a little better than the Canon SD800IS did when compared to the Fuji F40fd, but neither one outshone the Fuji. The problem is the Image Stabilizer for the Fuji. I'm going to test one out for myself soon, but I'm still deciding between the Canon SD800IS, SD850IS(but not limited to just these two with OIS); Sony DSC T100; or Fuji F40fd. Not that I'm a big manual control user, I would still like the option of manual controls if I'm going to be spending $400 something. That being said I still can't overlook all the positive professional and user reviews for Canon products, they are the most popular on almost every reviewing web site. And this Sony DSC T100 looks interesting. I know I have to decide for myself and I have really loved my Fuji E550, which is making some motor noises and will most likely not make it through my families vacation coming up soon. Whew...lots of baggage on my end, just have to give in to trial and error. Thanks again and any suggestions would be helpful.
reply to this comment
I've been considering a lot of cameras, mainly Canon because of the Optical Image Stabilization and all the positive reviews. I will mainly be using the camera as a take everywhere camera to capture my family on the go. I am very interested in Face Detection and the camera must be able to perform well anywhere at anytime, meaning crisp and clear shots inside, outside, day or night. I am really sorry to admit I have not been impressed with side by side test images between multiple point and shoot Canon products and a Fuji F30 on some professional review sites. The Sony DSC T100 faired a little better than the Canon SD800IS did when compared to the Fuji F40fd, but neither one outshone the Fuji. The problem is the Image Stabilizer for the Fuji. I'm going to test one out for myself soon, but I'm still deciding between the Canon SD800IS, SD850IS(but not limited to just these two with OIS); Sony DSC T100; or Fuji F40fd. Not that I'm a big manual control user, I would still like the option of manual controls if I'm going to be spending $400 something. That being said I still can't overlook all the positive professional and user reviews for Canon products, they are the most popular on almost every reviewing web site. And this Sony DSC T100 looks interesting. I know I have to decide for myself and I have really loved my Fuji E550, which is making some motor noises and will most likely not make it through my families vacation coming up soon. Whew...lots of baggage on my end, just have to give in to trial and error. Thanks again and any suggestions would be helpful.
turtlecurls (06/29/2007)
Jennifer, I took a Canon SD750 & Sony T100 home and tested for a few weeks in side by side photos. The Canon pictures were more crisp even though the Sony has IS. Family members comparing identical photo prints from both cameras mostly picked the Canon for color, sharpness, natural hues, etc.. So, the inclusion of IS may not be the overriding factor on what makes images crisp. The Sony W70 photos from an earlier test of mine were sharp enough. I wrote a longer review at the dpreview site for SD750. Good luck.
reply to this comment
I want a subcompact with at least 5 optical zoomI am considering the Kodak 875 and the Sony T100I am particularly wanting a fast shutter speed. (chows2175 — 06/18/2007)
I want to be able to take pictures of my grandkids outside or inside. I want to be able to take pictures at band concerts, school and church programs, graduations, pets etc.
reply to this comment
Joe (06/19/2007)
The Sont T100 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is clearly the sexiest of the two models and will fill your speed and zoom requirements, but on the downside you are paying for the sexiness. The sony t100 is a bit overprices by about $50-60 in my opinion and there are some other models where you can get more for the same price. For Example I would suggest checking out the Canon SD100 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) or the Canon Powershot a640 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) both of which have slightly shorter optical zooms (3x-4x) but still give the same high quality image. But if you don't mind spending a bit more and you want the James Bond toys i would give the Sony two thumbs up.
reply to this comment
jbailey (07/09/2007)
See the video review on CNET.COM. It shows that the A640 can use additional lenses, purchased separately.
reply to this comment
Is a fast card made for Sony DSC T100? Should I buy it or regular card? (KOTM — 06/16/2007)
My first digital camera. Sales person recommends Extreme III. Someone else says only regular card works in Sony T-100. Someone else says faster works but as an amateur I will never know the difference.
reply to this comment
Brenda Paro (06/17/2007)
The high speed cards should work in this camera. Whether or not you need one is really up to you. I think it has less to do with being an amateur than it does with what type of shooting you'll be doing. The use of a high speed card will speed up the time it takes your camera to 'save' photos after you take them, so if you like to shoot a lot of pictures right after each other, the high speed card may help. It can also help if you shoot lots of video. Otherwise, a regular card should be just fine. This is a pretty fast camera with either type of memory, so if you don't want to spring for the high speed, I wouldn't worry about it.
reply to this comment
KOTM (06/17/2007)
Brenda, that helps. Does anyone have enough experience with different card speeds to give an answer in seconds (or minutes or fractions of a second)? Maybe it takes 4 seconds on average before you can shoot another picture with the regular card but only 2 seconds with an Ultra and only 1/4 second with the extreme III. I expect to be taking "average" family and vacation shots most of the time (who knows, this is not only my first digital camera, it is also my first camera of any type; this is also my first computer). P.S. I noticed Brenda said high speed cards "should" work. If anyone answers, please make it clear if you are guessing, almost sure, or certain. Thanks! KOTM (hint to initials: I was a good wrestler in high school and college)
reply to this comment
Brenda Paro (06/18/2007)
Hi Tom,
I should have clarified my "should work" answer. Here is what I based that on:
-Sony website states compatibility with PRO cards, which are the high speed: sonystyle.com/is-bin/INTERS... Buy's memory compatibility finder (which, in my experience, is always right) states compatibility with high speed: bestbuy.upgradebase.com/res...
The reason I said 'should' is because sometimes freak things happen, and cards don't work with the memory it is claimed they are tested to work with. But considering the release date of this camera along with the websites above, I'd say I'm certain it will work.
In terms of speed, I don't have specific numbers for you since I can't seem to find timing tests on this camera and I haven't used it with both types of cards myself. But on Amazon, someone reviewing the high speed card mentioned that it doesn't seem to speed up the T100 much:
"Purchased this for my new Sony Cyber Shot DSC T100 camera and it works great. Not sure if the High Speed helps any over the regular speed."
(from the customer reviews at bottom of this page: amazon.com/Sony-Memory-MSX-... that helps!
reply to this comment
I should have clarified my "should work" answer. Here is what I based that on:
-Sony website states compatibility with PRO cards, which are the high speed: sonystyle.com/is-bin/INTERS... Buy's memory compatibility finder (which, in my experience, is always right) states compatibility with high speed: bestbuy.upgradebase.com/res...
The reason I said 'should' is because sometimes freak things happen, and cards don't work with the memory it is claimed they are tested to work with. But considering the release date of this camera along with the websites above, I'd say I'm certain it will work.
In terms of speed, I don't have specific numbers for you since I can't seem to find timing tests on this camera and I haven't used it with both types of cards myself. But on Amazon, someone reviewing the high speed card mentioned that it doesn't seem to speed up the T100 much:
"Purchased this for my new Sony Cyber Shot DSC T100 camera and it works great. Not sure if the High Speed helps any over the regular speed."
(from the customer reviews at bottom of this page: amazon.com/Sony-Memory-MSX-... that helps!
Hi, I have a confusion which one to choose between Sony DSC-T100, Sony DSC-H7 and Canon SD 800/850. Can anybody help me out ? (FriendNishant — 06/08/2007)
Hi, I have a confusion which one to choose between Sony DSC-T100, Sony DSC-H7 and Canon SD 800/850. Can anybody help me out ?
Picture Quality is the top-priority. Price is not an issue.
If you feel that any other model is superior to the above ones then plz suggest.
Waiting desperately for responce.
Thank You!!
reply to this comment
Picture Quality is the top-priority. Price is not an issue.
If you feel that any other model is superior to the above ones then plz suggest.
Waiting desperately for responce.
Thank You!!
by James DeRuvo (06/08/2007)
Usually, when we get a "which one to choose" question, I recommend people stop by this site ( imaging-resource.com/IMCOMP... ), which compares two cameras by looking at similar photos show with each camera.
From what I can see, Canon has the slight edge on outdoor photos, but for portraits, color, and up close/macro shots, the Sony T100 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) starts to pull away.
Having said that, I don't like SONY. It relies on proprietary technologies like memory sticks which can't be used in anything other than SONY products. In addition, you are paying for the SONY name.
But there's no mistaking my eyes and I see a definitely difference for the better with the T100. I couldn't test the H7 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), however, but it does get pretty good reviews and rates a B+. The Canon, on the other hand, rates an A- and has image stabilization.
In the end, you may just need to go to a camera store and hold them all to determine which one works for you.
reply to this comment
From what I can see, Canon has the slight edge on outdoor photos, but for portraits, color, and up close/macro shots, the Sony T100 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) starts to pull away.
Having said that, I don't like SONY. It relies on proprietary technologies like memory sticks which can't be used in anything other than SONY products. In addition, you are paying for the SONY name.
But there's no mistaking my eyes and I see a definitely difference for the better with the T100. I couldn't test the H7 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), however, but it does get pretty good reviews and rates a B+. The Canon, on the other hand, rates an A- and has image stabilization.
In the end, you may just need to go to a camera store and hold them all to determine which one works for you.
I'm using the cybershot t-100..date can only be seen on the camera display and not on the photos seen on pc...how do i turn on the date stamp? (jocelyn — 05/30/2007)
reply to this comment
bukit97 (05/30/2007)
A search in the T100 manual shows that there is no date stamp feature in the camera.
The main reason probably is that the date is already recorded in the EXIF data of every picture taken.
You can extract the date during printing if you are using a pictbridge compliant printer. Alternatively you can use a software to extract the date and have it printed on the pictures.
reply to this comment
The main reason probably is that the date is already recorded in the EXIF data of every picture taken.
You can extract the date during printing if you are using a pictbridge compliant printer. Alternatively you can use a software to extract the date and have it printed on the pictures.
shurid (06/15/2008)
nice ida. thnx
reply to this comment
So is there anyway to put date stamp on T-100 straight from picture taken instead of using other sofeware to input date stamp? (Stephy — 10/10/2010)
From all the comment I take it that there is no date stamp feature at all...which I find it hard to believe on any camera, thought that's a standard feature!!?
reply to this comment
Can it playback to screen in slow motion or half speed? (chapprg1 — 05/12/2007)
Low resolution (320) would be acceptable.
reply to this comment
Ben Keough (05/16/2007)
Hi Ron,
As far as I know, the video can't be played back on the camera itself in slow motion, but you can no doubt view the videos at adjusted speed on your computer if you have the proper software (I know there are at least a couple of freeware video players that have slow motion options).
Good luck!
reply to this comment
As far as I know, the video can't be played back on the camera itself in slow motion, but you can no doubt view the videos at adjusted speed on your computer if you have the proper software (I know there are at least a couple of freeware video players that have slow motion options).
Good luck!
what's the video format on the t100?? (blancai88 — 05/05/2007)
reply to this comment
Josh Vine (05/06/2007)
It is MPEG VX (VGA It can do 16 or 30 fps (frames per second) and can record until your memory card is full.
reply to this comment
Does the Sony T100 have a sportspack? (GreenEyed — 04/28/2007)
I was wondering if the Sony Cybershot T100 has a sportspack, lets say for example if I go scubadiving. Does anyone have an idea? Please and thank you =)
reply to this comment
China Mark (04/28/2007)
Hi,
Yes it does:
"Also available is a spare Lithium Ion rechargeable battery (NP-BG1), and a Marine Pack for use down to 40m underwater (MPK-THD)."
<A HREF="sonystyle.ca/commerce/servl... one link.
If you search on Google for the "MPK-THD" you will find lots of stockists.
Mark
reply to this comment
Yes it does:
"Also available is a spare Lithium Ion rechargeable battery (NP-BG1), and a Marine Pack for use down to 40m underwater (MPK-THD)."
<A HREF="sonystyle.ca/commerce/servl... one link.
If you search on Google for the "MPK-THD" you will find lots of stockists.
Mark
GreenEyed (04/28/2007)
Thanks China Mark!! I was beginning to get worried as the salespeople in a certain store (not to be mentioned) actually told me that there isn't one!
reply to this comment
When you zoom out when viewing pics is there a calander showing when pics were taken? (nico552 — 04/26/2007)
reply to this comment
China Mark (04/27/2007)
Hi Nick,
On page 18 of your user manual there are instructions on how to change the display settings for the information that is displayed on the screen during image playback.
Apparently, if you press the "disp" button during playback then you can toggle through the various display screens and one will appear showing the date and time the picture you're viewing was taken.
Hope this helps,
Mark
p.s. This will work as long as the date and time settings have been set correctly in the first place. (page 66)
reply to this comment
On page 18 of your user manual there are instructions on how to change the display settings for the information that is displayed on the screen during image playback.
Apparently, if you press the "disp" button during playback then you can toggle through the various display screens and one will appear showing the date and time the picture you're viewing was taken.
Hope this helps,
Mark
p.s. This will work as long as the date and time settings have been set correctly in the first place. (page 66)
Will be necessary to know how much time can I film with this camera? What about the resolution of films? (Italo05 — 04/21/2007)
I need to replace my video digital camera (3X, 5.1 megapixeles Sony Cybershot and my video cam Sony some old fashioned, with a unique product. I think is important a very good pictures and my question is about how good will be the films with this camera.
My cybershot also film in not a good quality.
reply to this comment
My cybershot also film in not a good quality.
Rich Watson (04/26/2007)
check out imaging-resource.com/MFR1.H...
reply to this comment
Italo05 (04/28/2007)
You did not anwer to me,,,,,,,, What about the resolution of films?
reply to this comment
Rich Watson (04/30/2007)
Any digital camera with 4 megapixels or more of resolution will give good resolution, for enlarged photos to at least 11 x14.
reply to this comment
any advice regarding my delibiration between the T100, Dsc-n1,n2 and Canon PowerShot SD700 IS? (heskyk — 04/18/2007)
i am going to use the camera for snapping day to day picture- not for cinematic photos
reply to this comment
Matt (05/09/2007)
With the DSC-N2, you're paying for the touch screen LCD, a novelty that, although nice, is completely unnecessary. The 10MP CCD will also have problems taking as good of pictures as a 7MP camera, because the CCD being jammed with extra pixels will reduce light penetration and so increase artifacts and noise.
From the cameras you listed, I'd go with the DS700IS. You might want to look at the DSC-T100. I was in the market and looked at the T100... I wans't fully impressed, but I'm out for picture quality, fast autofocus, fast response from depression to picture-taking... not the 5x zoom. To each his own, though, but I'd go for the SD700IS from your lineup.
reply to this comment
From the cameras you listed, I'd go with the DS700IS. You might want to look at the DSC-T100. I was in the market and looked at the T100... I wans't fully impressed, but I'm out for picture quality, fast autofocus, fast response from depression to picture-taking... not the 5x zoom. To each his own, though, but I'd go for the SD700IS from your lineup.
subhash (09/03/2007)
sony W 90 or T100 which is better
give me the comparision
difficult and confort
price in indian value
reply to this comment
give me the comparision
difficult and confort
price in indian value
what are the big differences of the t-50 and the t-100.I just bought the t-50 and love it but a week later i see the t-100 with more optical zoom and (arty — 04/07/2007)
I bought the t-50,I think I should of got the t-100,but It came out 2 weeks after I bought the t-50.what are the big differences besides the 5x opti and 6 times digital zoom? Does the t-50 have features the t100 don't?
reply to this comment
Joe (04/09/2007)
Well sorry to say but the T100 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) does have some nice extra features. Like a ISO rating of 3200 which means better pictures in low light situations, HD capabilities, more optical zoom, more MP, and the ability to use Pro Duo memory cards which are more advanced faster and have a bigger storage capability. This is basically the 2007 upgrade of the T50 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) but the T50 is still a great camera. You could exchange if you are concerned, but if you are happy with the T50 why spend more money unless you really thing the extra features will be used.
Good Luck
reply to this comment
Good Luck
arty (04/13/2007)
Thanks for your answer It was what I thought also.Do you know if the t-100 has the burst and also the multi burst features in the record mode.Because I do like those options with the t-50,and checking out the t-100 in the store I didn,t see them?
reply to this comment
ofer (05/02/2007)
does the t100 have a touchscreen?
reply to this comment
Qees (05/04/2007)
No. T100 doesn't have a touchscreen.
reply to this comment
jjofk (05/09/2007)
I have used the T-50, its a great camera and I don't know if I am technically correct in saying this, but the T-50 takes better pictures than the Sony H5 in certain low light situations. Can't figure out why.
reply to this comment
Any reviews on the T100 yet? (sweetyncl — 03/19/2007)
I wanted to know if there were any reviews out on the T100 from Sony. I know its new, but I wanted to know if it is as good as it sounds. I have been looking for a digital camera for awhile and this one has many of the features I have been looking for in a camera (5x optical zoom, 3 inch screen, pocket size, etc...)
reply to this comment
Brenda Paro (03/20/2007)
Hi Nicole,
I'm not seeing any reviews yet... I think it's still too early, although reviewers (at sites like dpreview.com) should be getting their hands on it pretty soon. If you want, you can read a ton of news releases about it:
google.com/search?hl=en&... you haven't seen those already, they should at least give you a better idea (although, of course, they won't talk about anything negative, so they're not exactly objective opinions to base a purchase off of). =)
I would keep an eye on Amazon (link up top, under Merchant Offers), as their consumer reviews tend to pop up fast.
reply to this comment
I'm not seeing any reviews yet... I think it's still too early, although reviewers (at sites like dpreview.com) should be getting their hands on it pretty soon. If you want, you can read a ton of news releases about it:
google.com/search?hl=en&... you haven't seen those already, they should at least give you a better idea (although, of course, they won't talk about anything negative, so they're not exactly objective opinions to base a purchase off of). =)
I would keep an eye on Amazon (link up top, under Merchant Offers), as their consumer reviews tend to pop up fast.
sweetyncl (03/21/2007)
Thank you very much. I appreciate your help :-)
reply to this comment
Junior (05/29/2007)
I have found several reviews to this camera through doing a Google search for Sony Cybershot T100. Try it out, and you'll see several responses. Not a whole lot but enough.
reply to this comment
Sony Cybershot T100 Reviews
Sony Cybershot T100 Reviews by Digital Camera-HQ Users
- 2.0 out of 5
flash not flashing
(gerry — 06/06/2009)
when i use t100 at night or in shade the flashlight does not flashed only afew months after i bought then after the flash not functioning any longer thus make the pictures taken dark.
- 2.0 out of 5
White spots
(Jenn D — 04/26/2008)
I have alot of white spots on NUMEROUS pictures. Already returned the camera once and will have to do it again. It ruins my pictures so I never know when a good picture is being taken.
- 2.0 out of 5
happiness ended with purple pictures
(pgreen — 04/22/2008)
love it for 7 months, then will only take purple pictures, have to send it back to mfg.., yuck.
- 5.0 out of 5
Small Wonder
(Michael J. Sawczak Jr. — 12/05/2007)
Bought it for the small size and was pleased with the outstanding quality of the pics and especially the video. Super fast boot-up when you open up the lens to shoot. At first, being a typical guy, who needs instructions! - I don't need them! - Wrong! The pics were just so-so until I went through the manual and learned exactly how to use the camera properly. Wow - the pics and video are now fantastic! I went to a Keith Urban concert and despite the low and varying lighting typical for a show like that, I wound up with fantastic shots (no flash) and I was blown away by the video quality, looks just like a professional music video! Clear, sharp focus, and it handled the lighting without a problem. Read the instructions - they really help to use the little Sony properly and practice - you won't be sorry. If you do a lot of indoor shots needing a flash - get one of the larger add-on flashes with bounce and you'll have prints like a pro! (the built-in flash is not quite adequate beyond 12-15 foot range)
- 5.0 out of 5
Great for traveling
(Drew Noden — 08/17/2007)
I purchased the T100 for a bicycling trip through Holland and N. Germany, wanting the advantage of 5X optical zoom in a small, light-weight format. During the flight overseas, I found and practiced using the exposure (both presets and manual), image delete, red-eye reduction, white balance, and metering controls. The camera performed very well in all light conditions, and was easy to quickly adjust for different light conditions. There is occasional bleaching in bright light (e.g. sunlight coming through trees or reflecting off of water), but this is true of most digital cameras. The large screen is bright enough for most situations. Print quality is excellent, although be aware that the default format ratio is 6x4.5, and most commercial prints are 6x4, so some cropping will occur unless you reformat on the computer.
- 5.0 out of 5
Very Compact Camera With Big Camera Type Results
(Jon Drake — 07/16/2007)
I've tested other 5X zoom cameras i.e. Olympus, Minox, GE.I found their image quality to be lacking.
Features I found to make the difference in priority order:
. High Quality Image results; photos taken of faces were really clear due to face dectection feature it really works!!
. Compactness ..only 3/4 In. thick (no protruding lens)
.Excellent quality photos in low light situations, the T100 brightens up under low light or dusk conditions.. no flash needed.
Cropping and picture trimming feature.. you can select 8, 5 MP to rerecord photos that have been cropped.
. Optical Image stabilization works very well.
. Red eye option.. set up in advance or correct post photo.
. Movies for me are clear and audio level is good as I have my camera set on highest level.
- Macro shots setting 1 or setting 2; one is super closer than the other.. great photo results.
. Photo transfer from Camera to Computer takes place very fast.. saving your battery.
notes: I carry an extra battery although I find I get 300+ photos from charged battery.
I bought a Sony leather case for the camera; fits snug there is room at the top of the case to grasp the camera for quick required shots. I also use a lanyard around my neck to steady the camera when I take photos 3X zoom or 5X zoom.
I set up my T100 as follows:
MENU
- Set camera to 8MP
- Face Detection ON
- Rec mode normal
- Oev set to 0 position
- Red Eye Reduction 'on'
HOME
Single Image
AF Illuminator 'Auto'
AF mode set to single
- Digital zoom set to 'precision'
- ISO Auto
-Metering Mode Multi
- Focus 'spot'
-White Bal Auto
- Steady Shot Shooting
-Flash level -0-
______________________________________________
Why others might not have liked the T100
1. They didn't bother to learn how to properly use the camera... i.e. used incorrect settings for their photos i.e. lighting, distances.
2. Fuzzy photos due to hand movement, pressed record button too quickly not allowing the camera to focus properly.
Hope this helps.
Jon
- 1.0 out of 5
Terrible quality
(Fabio — 07/09/2007)
I bought this camera because my friend was a T10 and takes awesome pictures, very sharp in any condition. T100 should be even better right? Wrong!!! Awful grainy pictures, I’m very disappointed, the quality is so bad that I wonder if is nothing broken with my camera.
Bad Camera!!
- 5.0 out of 5
A friend
(Dan Weaver — 06/12/2007)
I love my sony camera. I took it on a cruise about a week ago and I loved having it by my side. Really really clear pictures along with a great zoom and many features. Sharp looking and very slim so it can fit in your pocket or backpack. If you are looking for a camera by this one and you will not be let down.
- 5.0 out of 5
The best camera for undercover store pictures
(sandra — 06/10/2007)
This camera takes extra ordinary pictures - both inside and out. I make a living of shooting undercover pictures in stores and I have tried MANY MANY cameras before. This is by far the best. The pictures are sharp and crisp and it is almost impossible to mess them up. The steady shot really works. Outdoor pictures also turn out super. The pix can be blown-up without getting grainy like on all the other cameras I tried. The only thing I am not keen on using is the included software for the download of the pictures. It edits the pictures really poorly (way too much red and yellow!)and I went happily back to my Nikon Picture Project for editing my pix. My main client oversees was so impressed with the quality of the pictures, that he has bought one himself. I use a red one and in the store it looks like I am talking on the phone so nobody pays attention. :)
- 2.0 out of 5
very very bad picture quality
(Hari — 05/20/2007)
I purchased T100 recently and I returned back within two days.. The quality of the pictures are worst than the pictures taken with my cellphone. Its like VGA kind of quality.. I dont understand wt the hell sony implemented in this camera.. Better not to go for this.. surely u ll return this..
- 2.0 out of 5
Don't fall for it like I did.
(F.LECER — 05/16/2007)
Grainy pictures, not sharp enough, horrible indoor pictures regardless of settings. Colors blend in, my cell phone's picture kind of quality. I had Olympus 3300 and quality of the pictures was like 3 times better - at least. Such a disappointment. looks great, but that's it. BTW their sony card "instant approval", and sony card came to me after the sale was over?!?!
- 5.0 out of 5
As Borat would say, "Nice!"
(XMEN — 04/28/2007)
I've had it for two weeks and it's everything it intended to be. Having a 5x, high iso camera with anti-shake, face detection technology ---- in this form factor ... well you can't get it anywhere else ... not yet anyways, until the other cameras catch up a year from now.
- 5.0 out of 5
Easy to use - great pictures
(Peg Lorenzon — 04/10/2007)
I love the 3 inch LCD display, the face recogniton feature and the feel of the camera. It is not only stylish and fun, it is so easy to use. The menu and home buttons walk you through all settings and choices easily - I would say even intuitively. I had family members taking the camera out of my hand and taking pictures with no direction at all....and their pictures came out great. Speaking of prints...wow...the detail is great...gotta love the 8.1 megapixels! I have a 35 mm which I find too big and cumbersome for vacations. I bought this Sony for an upcoming cruise...I wanted a small compact camera I could slip into my pocket. I have a feeling my 35 mm may be collecting dust as this camera does way more than I expected. I have printed 8x10s - the clarity and colors are true to life...no fading of colors or blurring at this size. I got the red camera...so sassy!!! Buy it...you will love it!!!
