Sony CyberShot W100
Sony CyberShot W100
1
Hey! You should know that this product has been discontinued. Here are our current recommended cameras in the Point and Shoot Digital Cameras category.
Sony CyberShot W100
Editor's Review
Sony's W100 gives users point-and-shoot simplicity with a massive 8.1 megapixel sensor, allowing for superb prints. The W100 offers a new function guide to better convey the use and purpose of the various modes with simple text explanations displayed on the large 2.5 inch LCD screen. The resolution guide helps users decide what resolution is best for making digital prints, with a handy pop up screen telling you what the ideal print size is for your particular setting. Manual controls give the W100 lasting potential for growing users who want to graduate from the camera's auto functions. With all these helping hints, the W100 does what it can to ensure perfect pictures.
Editor's Review
Sony's W100 gives users point-and-shoot simplicity with a massive 8.1 megapixel sensor, allowing for superb prints. The W100 offers a new function guide to better convey the use and purpose of the various modes with simple text explanations displayed on the large 2.5 inch LCD screen. The resolution guide helps users decide what resolution is best for making digital prints, with a handy pop up screen telling you what the ideal print size is for your particular setting. Manual controls give the W100 lasting potential for growing users who want to graduate from the camera's auto functions. With all these helping hints, the W100 does what it can to ensure perfect pictures.
Specifications
- 8.1 megapixels
- 3x optical zoom / 2x digital zoom
- auto and manual focus
- auto exposure
- ISO 100-1000
- JPEG file format
- movie mode
- lithium ion battery
- 2.5 inch LCD
- Memory Stick storage (64MB internal)
- Part Number: DSCW100
- UPC: 027242686175
- Release Date: Mar 03, 2006
Shop for W100 Accessories
Sony CyberShot W100 Comments & Questions (write your own!)
Black screen (Vince — 05/03/2012)
why cant i see on the screen? its only shows black screen
reply to this comment
Chris Weigl (05/03/2012)
You need to hit the Display button on the back to turn the screen back on.
reply to this comment
How to take nightime football pictures (Georgann — 09/24/2010)
I have a Sony Cybershot DSC-H10. What settings should I use to take pictures of a night football game? None of my pics have turned out and I've tried different settings but know very little about photography.
reply to this comment
Chris Weigl (09/26/2010)
There's really nothing you can do to fix this. The H10 simply isn't equipped to deal with low-light action photography. You can try raising the ISO up but you'll just get grainy photos. This is why sports shooters use DSLRs and large, fast lenses.
reply to this comment
Georgann (09/30/2010)
Thank you so much. That's what I thought based on the fact that I tried every combination of setting that I could. I think this is a perfect excuse for me to get a new camera.
reply to this comment
Priya (09/07/2010)
how can i retrieve my photo that was accidentally deleted
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (09/08/2010)
There are some programs that allow you to do this from Memory Stick, but I'm not sure how reputable any of them are so I won't link directly. Google "photo retrieval software" and poke around -- they all look like they cost around $40.
reply to this comment
What didital camera's has date back? Has to have 10 or more megapixels (crwofter1 — 09/14/2009)
I know the new Sony's don't and Olympus doesn't either. I just spent 90.00 on a New Sony for NOTHING!
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (09/15/2009)
Date backs have fallen out of favor of late to make room for other features like face detection, image stabilization, etc. And the fact is, the date and time are in the images as part of the EXIF data which also says what the shutter speed and f stop used was. So there isn't really a need to print on date anymore.
The good news is that the W100 is PictBridge compatible, allowing direct printing from the camera to any PictBridge compatible printer and get the date printed directly on the image.
reply to this comment
The good news is that the W100 is PictBridge compatible, allowing direct printing from the camera to any PictBridge compatible printer and get the date printed directly on the image.
Sony Memory stick icon is now replaced by the Sony digital camera (Michael2003 — 05/11/2009)
Hello
There use to be the Sony memory icon display when I plugged in the camera to USB and clicked on computer. Now it shows a camera and it says, Sony Digital Camera. I know I did something accidently wrong as it was good for the last two years. I can only copy photos, not delete and it seem like I have lost control. How can I get it back like before.
Thanks
Michael
reply to this comment
There use to be the Sony memory icon display when I plugged in the camera to USB and clicked on computer. Now it shows a camera and it says, Sony Digital Camera. I know I did something accidently wrong as it was good for the last two years. I can only copy photos, not delete and it seem like I have lost control. How can I get it back like before.
Thanks
Michael
Michael2003 (05/13/2009)
I figured it out myself. You plug in the USB to the camera and connect it to the computer. Click on "Mass Storage" instead of USB connect. That's the problem.
reply to this comment
I want to delete pictures from cybershot viewer, I don't want to buy another program. Am I out of luck? (tjdinfl — 10/14/2008)
I can't believe you can't delete photos from cybershot viewer. The software works fine for me since all I need it for is the occasional resizing. but after I re size them I usually would like to delete them. I use my camera for work and after I upload pics to the website I am done with them. Any suggestions? I don't want to pay for another program.
I put 10 points but I have 20, this is my first post, so I will award the 20 instead of 10 (It wouldn't let me edit that). Thanks
reply to this comment
I put 10 points but I have 20, this is my first post, so I will award the 20 instead of 10 (It wouldn't let me edit that). Thanks
bukit97 (10/16/2008)
Windows Explorer can delete the pictures for you.
While you are at it, you might as well change over to using a Card Reader to copy the pictures from the memory stick to the computer, and using Picasa to manage your pictures.
Picasa, free from Google, will let you do most of the things you want to do, and free you from Cybershot Viewer.
reply to this comment
While you are at it, you might as well change over to using a Card Reader to copy the pictures from the memory stick to the computer, and using Picasa to manage your pictures.
Picasa, free from Google, will let you do most of the things you want to do, and free you from Cybershot Viewer.
by James DeRuvo (10/16/2008)
Bukit is right. Much better for the memory card and easier.
reply to this comment
tjdinfl (10/16/2008)
I figured it out, you CAN delete pictures from cybershot viewer. Under tools you click "Update Database" and anything I deleted in "My Pictures" us also deleted in the viewer. But thanks for the replies and I will take a look at picasa, but I don't use the card, I connect the chord to the camera and upload that way. What could be easier than that?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (10/17/2008)
I love it when questioners figure out their own answer. Well done, Todd!
reply to this comment
does anyone have a problem with the camera switching modes without touching the wheel (msskaggs08 — 07/27/2008)
i am tryin to take a picture and the wheel moves to either movie or another setting. i had sony "fixed" the problem twice and what do you know, it happens again.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (07/29/2008)
Simply put, it's a design fault. The Wheel will simply work it's way loose to the point where it'll move like that. My recommendation would be to request an RMA replacement and get a different model.
reply to this comment
how can I get flash to work other than in portrait mode? (taa5925 — 05/12/2008)
I have the sony cybershot DSC-W100. The flash only works in Portrait mode, which is impossible to use because the subjects have to sit still for a long time until the camera finally flashes and records the picture. How can I get the flash to work in other situations that have low light? I want the picture to be taken quickly so as not to result in a blurred photo!
reply to this comment
Andrew Skinner (05/12/2008)
Terry,
With any digital, point-and-shoot camera you're going to experience some shutter lag when shooting in low light (with or without a flash). To have your flash work with other modes, you should be able to push the flash button on the back of your camera (indicated with a lightning bolt) until you get the desired flash type in any mode (just the bolt forces the flash on, the bolt with the letters "SL" is a slow synch flash to brighten the background, and the bolt crossed out forces the flash off). I hope this helps.
Andrew
reply to this comment
With any digital, point-and-shoot camera you're going to experience some shutter lag when shooting in low light (with or without a flash). To have your flash work with other modes, you should be able to push the flash button on the back of your camera (indicated with a lightning bolt) until you get the desired flash type in any mode (just the bolt forces the flash on, the bolt with the letters "SL" is a slow synch flash to brighten the background, and the bolt crossed out forces the flash off). I hope this helps.
Andrew
taa5925 (05/12/2008)
I have pushed the flash button, however all that changes is that "a stack of papers flashes" above the lighning bolt with a line threw it, which appears on the LCD screen! I can not get the flash type to change!
reply to this comment
Andrew Skinner (05/13/2008)
Terry,
This "stack of papers flashing" should mean you are in "burst" mode. The flash will not work in this mode. You can turn it off by pressing the Menu button on the back of the camera next to your LCD screen and scrolling down to Mode (Rec Mode). Once in that portion of the menu, select "Normal" and your flash should work again. Good luck.
Andrew
reply to this comment
This "stack of papers flashing" should mean you are in "burst" mode. The flash will not work in this mode. You can turn it off by pressing the Menu button on the back of the camera next to your LCD screen and scrolling down to Mode (Rec Mode). Once in that portion of the menu, select "Normal" and your flash should work again. Good luck.
Andrew
taa5925 (05/13/2008)
Andrew,
Thank You!!!!! I followed your directions, which worked like a charm. I hoped that it would be something simple and that the camera wasn't malfunctioning! I've had the camera for 2 years and was never able to use the flash! Other than that, I had no complaints. I love the camera! Thank You, so much for your help!!!!
Terry A
reply to this comment
Thank You!!!!! I followed your directions, which worked like a charm. I hoped that it would be something simple and that the camera wasn't malfunctioning! I've had the camera for 2 years and was never able to use the flash! Other than that, I had no complaints. I love the camera! Thank You, so much for your help!!!!
Terry A
Andrew Skinner (05/15/2008)
Terry,
I'm glad we could help. Please come back with any other questions or issues.
Andrew
reply to this comment
I'm glad we could help. Please come back with any other questions or issues.
Andrew
dsc-w100 data corrupted How can I recover mydata from these *.chk files (appaji13 — 02/18/2008)
in dsc-w100 I shot many photos and movies suddenly it showd there is no space on the memory card immeditele i came back to view photos menu but nothing is there. I connected it to pc that used space is almost full, but I unable to see the photos both misc and DCIM FOLDERS are found missing. When I tried for backup and recovery process I got many *.chk files. How can I recover mydata from these *.chk files
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (02/18/2008)
a .chk file is where the recovery process has found file fragments. You can try and recover them further using a CHK recovery utility. There are several. here's one such example ( diydatarecovery.nl/chkmate.htm ).
reply to this comment
will not snap picture (waterman — 11/16/2007)
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (11/16/2007)
First thing I would do is reset the camera. This is a fairly easy procedure which involves either going into your setup menu and choosing "reset," holding down the menu key for 5 seconds, or, removing the batteries for a few minutes. It may be that the firmware loading got corrupted and the camera just needs to be "rebooted," which is something that turning it on/off won't accomplish. But after which, you should have the camera reset to factory default settings.
Another tip is to go to Sony's website and look for firmware updates. Download and install them.
Absent that, verify that you're wheel is set for the right settings. If it's coming loose, you may run into picture taking issues and will have to have it serviced.
Was it dropped?
reply to this comment
Another tip is to go to Sony's website and look for firmware updates. Download and install them.
Absent that, verify that you're wheel is set for the right settings. If it's coming loose, you may run into picture taking issues and will have to have it serviced.
Was it dropped?
waterman (11/17/2007)
thank you neil wright
reply to this comment
DSC-W100 Showing Shaking Hand Warning and Refusing to Take Shots in Light (GuttahGrrl — 10/10/2007)
Hi there, my camera is no longer taking pictures/being incredibly finicking and showing a shaking hand symbol very annoyingly. It's a DSC-W100 but however it takes no pictures at all now and full light doesn't seem to help. Anything that doesn't involve the shop would be great as I hate where I bought it and want it for vacation soon. Thanks so much.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (10/11/2007)
First thing I would do is reset the camera. This is a fairly easy procedure which involves either going into your setup menu and choosing "reset," or, removing the batteries for a few minutes. It may be that the firmware loading got corrupted and the camera just needs to be "rebooted," which is something that turning it on/off won't accomplish. But after which, you should have the camera reset to factory default settings.
Another tip is to go to Sony's website and look for firmware updates. Download and install them. Using fresh batteries wouldn't hurt either.
reply to this comment
Another tip is to go to Sony's website and look for firmware updates. Download and install them. Using fresh batteries wouldn't hurt either.
GuttahGrrl (10/11/2007)
Hey there, tried everything including re-initializing (which I know "worked" cause I had to reset my timestamp) but sadly not much has changed. I can't find any firmware updates on the Sony site though I'm on the DSC-W100 page. I guess I have to suck it up and send it in. Thank you very much though!
reply to this comment
any good tip to cut now reflection on pics that r framed in clear glass? (imamura — 09/08/2007)
trying to get portfolio together, however art is framed in glass=with or with out flash=with or without natural--always get too much reflection. Even after editing to touch up later in apple program. Need to take pic the best possible way.. TY
reply to this comment
j. armijo (09/09/2007)
Hey Marc, I would try a circular polarizing lens and see if that helps. I know they cut reflection and glare on glass out doors and I am sure they should work as well indoors.
reply to this comment
imamura (09/09/2007)
well that is not posssible with with a cybershot dc100-but ty 4 tha idea
reply to this comment
j. armijo (09/09/2007)
Hey Marc , The polarizing lens may not screw on to your camera, But you can try holding it in front of your lens. It may still work for you. I do this with an older kodak easyshare camera with very good results.
reply to this comment
how do i delete all of the pictures on the camera itself in one shot not 1 by 1? (reed21601 — 06/07/2007)
i have the sony cybershot w100 and was wondering if sdomeonce can tell me how to delete all of the pictures on the camera in one shot, i have hundreds of them on the camera i would like to erase..i have them all stored on my computer and want to free up the memory on the camera to take more photos.
reply to this comment
bukit97 (06/07/2007)
Usually I would format the card instead of deleting them one by one.
There should also be an option to delete all if you play around with the delete button.
reply to this comment
There should also be an option to delete all if you play around with the delete button.
Mayo (10/02/2007)
RTFM!!! (I just did). You delete all by selecting the pics in the thumbnail view on the camera (eg, you can view about a dozen shots per view). Click the bottom-most button (it has what looks like a couple of rubiks cubes with a dustbin). Select delete all in folder by using the up arrow, the accept that and hey presto.
reply to this comment
HI ALL!! Am having a budget of INR 12000(approx $267) for a digital camera. (sidneyjec — 03/11/2007)
I have zeroed in on olympus fe220/230/190/170; sony dsc600; nikon coolpix S9/L3; canon A530?? Any suggestions which one to buy?? Am also looking for features like Image stablizing, video footage, red eye fixation.
reply to this comment
bacasperka (03/11/2007)
none of them! Buy NIkon Coolpix 7600 ... easy to operate and high quality
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (08/23/2007)
Are you still looking for a new camera? Here's a list of the highest ranked cameras in that price range:
Canon Powershot SD750
7.1 megapixels; 3x optical zoom / 4x digital zoom; Auto focus; Auto exposure; JPEG Exif 2.2, DCF, DPOF file formats; Movie mode with sound; ISO 80-1600; Proprietary lithium-ion batteries; 3 inch LCD; SD / SDHC / MMC storage (32 MB card supplied)....
A
HQ Grade: A
Panasonic Lumix TZ3
7.2 megapixels; 10x optical zoom / 4x digital zoom; 16:9 widescreen mode, 28mm wide-angle lens; Movie mode; JPEG file format; Panasonic MEGA Optical Image Stabilization; ISO 100-3200; 3.0-inch LCD; Secure Digital card storage (12.7MB internal); Lithium ion battery....
A-
HQ Grade: A-
Canon Powershot SD1000
7.1 megapixels; 3x optical zoom / 4x digital zoom; Auto focus and exposure; JPEG file format; Movie mode with sound; ISO 80-1600; 2.5-inch LCD; Secure Digital memory (32MB included); Lithium-ion battery....
A-
HQ Grade: A-
Amazing Touchscreen Interface
Sony Cybershot N2
10 megapixels; 3x optical zoom; Sony Super Steady Shot Image Stabilization; Auto focus / "Free-Spot" selectable focus, auto and manual exposure; Movie mode with sound; JPEG file format; ISO 100-1600; Memory Stick storage (25MB internal); 3.0-inch touchscreen LCD; Lithium-ion battery....
A-
HQ Grade: A-
Excellent All-Around Digital Camera
Canon PowerShot A640
10 megapixels; Movie mode with sound; JPEG file format; 4x optical zoom / 4x digital zoom; Auto focus, auto and manual exposure; 2.5-inch LCD display; Secure Digital Card Storage (32MB Internal); ISO 80-800; 4 AA batteries....
A-
HQ Grade: A-
Panasonic Lumix FZ8
7.2 megapixels; 12x optical zoom / 4x digital zoom; Panasonic MEGA Optical Image Stabilization; Auto and manual focus; Movie mode; ISO 100-3200; Auto and manual exposure; 2.5-inch LCD; Secure Digital card storage (27MB internal); Lithium ion battery....
A-
HQ Grade: A-
reply to this comment
Canon Powershot SD750
7.1 megapixels; 3x optical zoom / 4x digital zoom; Auto focus; Auto exposure; JPEG Exif 2.2, DCF, DPOF file formats; Movie mode with sound; ISO 80-1600; Proprietary lithium-ion batteries; 3 inch LCD; SD / SDHC / MMC storage (32 MB card supplied)....
A
HQ Grade: A
Panasonic Lumix TZ3
7.2 megapixels; 10x optical zoom / 4x digital zoom; 16:9 widescreen mode, 28mm wide-angle lens; Movie mode; JPEG file format; Panasonic MEGA Optical Image Stabilization; ISO 100-3200; 3.0-inch LCD; Secure Digital card storage (12.7MB internal); Lithium ion battery....
A-
HQ Grade: A-
Canon Powershot SD1000
7.1 megapixels; 3x optical zoom / 4x digital zoom; Auto focus and exposure; JPEG file format; Movie mode with sound; ISO 80-1600; 2.5-inch LCD; Secure Digital memory (32MB included); Lithium-ion battery....
A-
HQ Grade: A-
Amazing Touchscreen Interface
Sony Cybershot N2
10 megapixels; 3x optical zoom; Sony Super Steady Shot Image Stabilization; Auto focus / "Free-Spot" selectable focus, auto and manual exposure; Movie mode with sound; JPEG file format; ISO 100-1600; Memory Stick storage (25MB internal); 3.0-inch touchscreen LCD; Lithium-ion battery....
A-
HQ Grade: A-
Excellent All-Around Digital Camera
Canon PowerShot A640
10 megapixels; Movie mode with sound; JPEG file format; 4x optical zoom / 4x digital zoom; Auto focus, auto and manual exposure; 2.5-inch LCD display; Secure Digital Card Storage (32MB Internal); ISO 80-800; 4 AA batteries....
A-
HQ Grade: A-
Panasonic Lumix FZ8
7.2 megapixels; 12x optical zoom / 4x digital zoom; Panasonic MEGA Optical Image Stabilization; Auto and manual focus; Movie mode; ISO 100-3200; Auto and manual exposure; 2.5-inch LCD; Secure Digital card storage (27MB internal); Lithium ion battery....
A-
HQ Grade: A-
Abychan (06/10/2009)
Hai Friends, I am having a budjet of IRN 30.000. and i prefer SLR cameras, either Canon/Sony. Anybody help me to buy. Please give me suggestions. Pls Pls...........
reply to this comment
Sony W100 does not have the date stamp feature. Do any of the newer cameras similar to the W100 have this feature? (Alaskanleader — 03/05/2007)
I was told most new cameras do not have the feature to show the date in the corner of the photo, both on computer and printing.
reply to this comment
bukit97 (03/06/2007)
Yes, Canon 800is, Canon A80, Canon A75, Canon SD600 are examples of cameras with date stamp feature, probably there are a few more if one search around.
Further more, since the adoption of Exif format, the date a picture is taken is already included in the Exif file attached to a picture. It is a date stamp in a different way, and can be extracted and shown on the computer or printed on a picture if you want to.
Date Stamp, as a feature, is therefore not a good indicator of new or old cameras, it just happen that W100 does not have it.
reply to this comment
Further more, since the adoption of Exif format, the date a picture is taken is already included in the Exif file attached to a picture. It is a date stamp in a different way, and can be extracted and shown on the computer or printed on a picture if you want to.
Date Stamp, as a feature, is therefore not a good indicator of new or old cameras, it just happen that W100 does not have it.
sarokhm (03/22/2007)
could u tell me how I could extract the date and make it show on the picture if i wanna print it out???
reply to this comment
Alaskanleader (03/22/2007)
I would like to know myself. Bukit97 do you know? Is after market software required to extract the date, show it on the computer and print it on the photo using windows XP?
reply to this comment
sarokhm (04/06/2007)
was Bukit97 serious when he said we could extract the date and get it printed on the pic? is that really posssible or is he just kindling our hopes?
reply to this comment
Alaskanleader (04/07/2007)
I did not get a response from bukit97 on my March 22 question and I have not figured out how to extract and print the date from my computer and printer.
reply to this comment
sarokhm (04/23/2007)
hi Alaskan. is there any other forum that could help us get the answer for our question? I am not satisfied with Sony W100 if i can not get the date stamp on the pics?
reply to this comment
Alaskanleader (04/23/2007)
Hi sarokhn:
I do not know of any other forum at this time. Like you I am dissatisfied with the W100 because of the lack of date stamp. What an easy feature to have with the option to turn it off if not wanted. I do not understatnd why Sony would change this. I will let you know if I ever find a solution.
reply to this comment
I do not know of any other forum at this time. Like you I am dissatisfied with the W100 because of the lack of date stamp. What an easy feature to have with the option to turn it off if not wanted. I do not understatnd why Sony would change this. I will let you know if I ever find a solution.
tshap (04/27/2007)
Why don't you get the software that imprints the date unto your photos?
reply to this comment
bukit97 (04/28/2007)
Hi Everybody, I am back.
You can print dates on the picture by connecting a pictbridge complaint camera to a 'pictbridge compliant' printer. Many of the latest cameras and printers are pictbridge compliant.
Otherwise you can download Magitime from <a href="freedownloadscenter.com/Rev... location</a>
Install and run Magitime. On the window that appear, click the "+" sign on the top left hand corner and select your picture.
This will place it on the left side of the screen.
Click on this picture and an enlarge version appears on the right side with date on it.
You can click and drag the date to place it at the selected position.
Click 'run' will save the picture with date for future printing.
I have answered similar questions a number of times, dating back as far as 16 Jan 07.
Click <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... site</a> to see one of the previous answers.
reply to this comment
You can print dates on the picture by connecting a pictbridge complaint camera to a 'pictbridge compliant' printer. Many of the latest cameras and printers are pictbridge compliant.
Otherwise you can download Magitime from <a href="freedownloadscenter.com/Rev... location</a>
Install and run Magitime. On the window that appear, click the "+" sign on the top left hand corner and select your picture.
This will place it on the left side of the screen.
Click on this picture and an enlarge version appears on the right side with date on it.
You can click and drag the date to place it at the selected position.
Click 'run' will save the picture with date for future printing.
I have answered similar questions a number of times, dating back as far as 16 Jan 07.
Click <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... site</a> to see one of the previous answers.
Eric (08/13/2007)
Currently, are there any Sony CyberShot camera that has the Date Stamp feature built inside of the camera? Instead of using secondary program that add the date back using a computer.
If there is camera from Sony that has the Date Stamp feature, please give me the model number so that I could look it up myself.
reply to this comment
If there is camera from Sony that has the Date Stamp feature, please give me the model number so that I could look it up myself.
BigV (09/07/2007)
You can print the date and time on the pic by using the software provided by sony
reply to this comment
Toad (08/29/2009)
I think it is clear that this question has NOT been answered. We are trying to find a camera that will date stamp a digital photo for viewing on a computer/digital frame without having to go into each picture individually and cut/paste a date onto the image, not provide a date for printing.
Nobody has answered that question, as far as I can tell. I have an older Sony (it has the stamp) and a new(er) one which does not. When pictures come up on the digi-frame on the computer slide show we would like to be able to see the date; it's that simple.
Thanks to the first who can provide an answer.
reply to this comment
Nobody has answered that question, as far as I can tell. I have an older Sony (it has the stamp) and a new(er) one which does not. When pictures come up on the digi-frame on the computer slide show we would like to be able to see the date; it's that simple.
Thanks to the first who can provide an answer.
Which is better for beginner this camera or the HP photosmart 827? (wfalls123 — 02/17/2007)
reply to this comment
Ben Keough (02/19/2007)
Diovan,
Frankly, I wouldn't wish a HP digital camera on anyone. They make great printers and ok computers, but their cameras are also-rans at best. Their cameras are cheap, feature-poor, and unreliable.
A lot of people come here asking which camera is best for a beginner, but honestly, most consumer-level digital cameras are equally usable for newbies. All of them have excellent automatic modes, and there's not that much difference from one automatic mode to another. Most of them also have very intuitive menu systems. Kodak often gets touted as the manufacturer that's most friendly to beginners, but I don't truly see that big of a difference between the major manufacturers.
You'd be fine with the W100, which is a very capable camera.
Hope this helps!
reply to this comment
Frankly, I wouldn't wish a HP digital camera on anyone. They make great printers and ok computers, but their cameras are also-rans at best. Their cameras are cheap, feature-poor, and unreliable.
A lot of people come here asking which camera is best for a beginner, but honestly, most consumer-level digital cameras are equally usable for newbies. All of them have excellent automatic modes, and there's not that much difference from one automatic mode to another. Most of them also have very intuitive menu systems. Kodak often gets touted as the manufacturer that's most friendly to beginners, but I don't truly see that big of a difference between the major manufacturers.
You'd be fine with the W100, which is a very capable camera.
Hope this helps!
SONY CyberShot W100 (RichardLovesAmy — 02/15/2007)
I'm interested in the SONY CyberShot W100. Most of the pictures I will be taking is indoors with some possible low-light situations. Do I need some sort of flash attachment?
reply to this comment
bukit97 (02/15/2007)
If you do a lot of indoor photography, and with possible low light situations, you do need to supplement the built in flash of W100 with a more powerful external flash.
External flash for compacts has a built in slave unit that respond to the flash of your camera by triggering the flash almost instantaneously.
Canon has such a flash for some of it's compacts but you can take a look at Sunpak remote-lite 11 that comes with a bracket and shoe to lock the external flash to the base of the camera.
You may log on to the following sites for further information :
intro2020.co.uk/pages/sunpa...
reply to this comment
External flash for compacts has a built in slave unit that respond to the flash of your camera by triggering the flash almost instantaneously.
Canon has such a flash for some of it's compacts but you can take a look at Sunpak remote-lite 11 that comes with a bracket and shoe to lock the external flash to the base of the camera.
You may log on to the following sites for further information :
intro2020.co.uk/pages/sunpa...
does this camera have the magifying glass feature like the newer Sony DSC-T10? (sadhlakha — 02/11/2007)
I want to be able to take very close pictures
reply to this comment
bukit97 (02/11/2007)
T10 can take very close pictures of 1cm away and W100 can do it at 6cm.
Even at 6cm away, Sony DSC W100 can capture a small minimum area of 2.37 x 1.78 inches (60 x 45 millimeters).
This should be good enough for you to take pictures of postage stamps, coins and insects, if they are immobilized.
Beyond that, you probably has to buy a dSLR because dSLRs with extension tubes /bellows can do much more than compact cameras.
reply to this comment
Even at 6cm away, Sony DSC W100 can capture a small minimum area of 2.37 x 1.78 inches (60 x 45 millimeters).
This should be good enough for you to take pictures of postage stamps, coins and insects, if they are immobilized.
Beyond that, you probably has to buy a dSLR because dSLRs with extension tubes /bellows can do much more than compact cameras.
which is better canon a710 or sony w100 (OffroadRN — 02/06/2007)
reply to this comment
Ben Keough (02/06/2007)
Hi Linda,
"Better" is always a relative thing when it comes to questions like this, but maybe a look at the stats can help you out here. You can click here ( dpreview.com/reviews/compar... ) to see a head-to-head comparison. I'll do my best to interpret.
In terms of resolution and sensor size, the W100 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is the winner. It's not only got more megapixels (8 to 7), but a larger sensor. This means that those extra pixels have a lot more room on the chip, which means that each pixel gets more access to the light that makes up your image, which means that your images should have less noise and come out sharper and cleaner (particularly in lower light).
However, the A710 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) has several huge advantages. First of all, it's got a 6x optical zoom as compared to the W100's 3x. Paired up with that better lens, the A710 has an optical image stabilization system, which means that the lens elements actually move to compensate for your hands shaking when you take a picture. The result is that shots that would have otherwise been lost to blur are often crystal clear.
In terms of size and weight, the W100 is a bit smaller, most notably in terms of its thickness (1" to the A710's 1.6"). Both cameras have a 2.5", 115,000px screen, which is fairly standard for cameras today.
Other considerations:
1. Macro. The A710 IS has a much better macro mode (1cm focal distance compared to the W100's 6cm). This means that it can take sharp pictures of things much closer to the lens.
2. Batteries. The A710 IS takes AA batteries, which some people see as a downer, but I see as a big plus. With a camera that takes AAs, you can use AA NiMH rechargables, which are cheap and readily available. Much, much cheaper than the proprietary lithium ion batteries that the Sony uses.
3. Memory cards. Again, Sony uses a proprietary format--the MemoryStick. The A710 IS uses the much more readily available (and cheaper) SecureDigital format.
Personally speaking, I don't think that the extra size and the slightly smaller CCD sensor are enough to outweigh the big advantages the A710 has. It's my pick here. However, users seem to love both cameras. You might want to consider going into a big store like a BestBuy and try both cameras in-hand, see which feels better to you.
reply to this comment
"Better" is always a relative thing when it comes to questions like this, but maybe a look at the stats can help you out here. You can click here ( dpreview.com/reviews/compar... ) to see a head-to-head comparison. I'll do my best to interpret.
In terms of resolution and sensor size, the W100 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is the winner. It's not only got more megapixels (8 to 7), but a larger sensor. This means that those extra pixels have a lot more room on the chip, which means that each pixel gets more access to the light that makes up your image, which means that your images should have less noise and come out sharper and cleaner (particularly in lower light).
However, the A710 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) has several huge advantages. First of all, it's got a 6x optical zoom as compared to the W100's 3x. Paired up with that better lens, the A710 has an optical image stabilization system, which means that the lens elements actually move to compensate for your hands shaking when you take a picture. The result is that shots that would have otherwise been lost to blur are often crystal clear.
In terms of size and weight, the W100 is a bit smaller, most notably in terms of its thickness (1" to the A710's 1.6"). Both cameras have a 2.5", 115,000px screen, which is fairly standard for cameras today.
Other considerations:
1. Macro. The A710 IS has a much better macro mode (1cm focal distance compared to the W100's 6cm). This means that it can take sharp pictures of things much closer to the lens.
2. Batteries. The A710 IS takes AA batteries, which some people see as a downer, but I see as a big plus. With a camera that takes AAs, you can use AA NiMH rechargables, which are cheap and readily available. Much, much cheaper than the proprietary lithium ion batteries that the Sony uses.
3. Memory cards. Again, Sony uses a proprietary format--the MemoryStick. The A710 IS uses the much more readily available (and cheaper) SecureDigital format.
Personally speaking, I don't think that the extra size and the slightly smaller CCD sensor are enough to outweigh the big advantages the A710 has. It's my pick here. However, users seem to love both cameras. You might want to consider going into a big store like a BestBuy and try both cameras in-hand, see which feels better to you.
Can this camera do rapid shot photos or burst shooting? (kfsturg50 — 02/05/2007)
reply to this comment
bukit97 (02/05/2007)
Reviews at Image Resource and digitalcamerainfo quoted a burst mode of 1 frame per second for W100.
There is another multi-burst option that takes 16 quick shots at 1/30, 1/15, or 1/7.5 seconds, then 'stitches the images into a 1-megapixel shot and plays them back like a choppy movie '
In view of the above, burst mode is available in W100 even though it is not one of the fastest around.
reply to this comment
There is another multi-burst option that takes 16 quick shots at 1/30, 1/15, or 1/7.5 seconds, then 'stitches the images into a 1-megapixel shot and plays them back like a choppy movie '
In view of the above, burst mode is available in W100 even though it is not one of the fastest around.
what is the difference between Sony W100 and the Sony DSC W100? Is it the color? or are they rreally different?? (celena — 02/04/2007)
reply to this comment
cagdas (02/05/2007)
hi celena
they are the same cam. the original name of this cam is DCSW100. W100 is written for only shortening.
reply to this comment
they are the same cam. the original name of this cam is DCSW100. W100 is written for only shortening.
w100 or t10 (cagdas — 01/31/2007)
hi everyone. this will be the first digi cam that i have ever used and i hesitate that which one i will buy. according to the reviews t10 has some problems such as red eyes, white spot and blurry in photos on the other hand i fell in love its design.please help me...thanks a lot
reply to this comment
Ben Keough (01/31/2007)
Hi,
The T10 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) has a definite size/weight edge, especially in terms of its slimness, but the W100 is a much more reliable and full-featured camera. It's also still quite small.
The W100 offers higher resolution (8MP vs. the T10's 7MP), and also uses a much larger imaging sensor (1/1.8" vs. the T10's 1/2.5"). This combination should mean that the image quality will be better than with the T10 (and user/pro reviews seem to indicate that it is).
The W100 also has a greater degree of manual control options, which will be useful if you're shooting at night without flash, or if you want to get artistic later on. Both cameras (and indeed the smaller Sonys in general) have issues with red eye, though the W100 doesn't seem to have as many problems with the white spot issues that the T10 has been plagued with.
In my opinion, the W100 is by far the better camera here, though it does lack the WOW factor that the T10's design gives you. It should also be quite a bit cheaper.
Hope this helps!
reply to this comment
The T10 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) has a definite size/weight edge, especially in terms of its slimness, but the W100 is a much more reliable and full-featured camera. It's also still quite small.
The W100 offers higher resolution (8MP vs. the T10's 7MP), and also uses a much larger imaging sensor (1/1.8" vs. the T10's 1/2.5"). This combination should mean that the image quality will be better than with the T10 (and user/pro reviews seem to indicate that it is).
The W100 also has a greater degree of manual control options, which will be useful if you're shooting at night without flash, or if you want to get artistic later on. Both cameras (and indeed the smaller Sonys in general) have issues with red eye, though the W100 doesn't seem to have as many problems with the white spot issues that the T10 has been plagued with.
In my opinion, the W100 is by far the better camera here, though it does lack the WOW factor that the T10's design gives you. It should also be quite a bit cheaper.
Hope this helps!
cagdas (02/01/2007)
thanks for your information ben but i wonder the double anti-blur protection of T10. it has both light sensitivity ( even it is smaller than w100 t10:1250 w100:1000) and optical image stabilization.does the ability of optical image stabilization of t10 make better than w100??? also i searched that the lcd pixels of t10(230000) is higher than w100 (115000). is it an really important issue. actually these two ýssues conflict with the other better properties of w100. and i am calling out to everyone!!! which one should i prefer??
reply to this comment
Ben Keough (02/01/2007)
The image stabilization is indeed a very nice feature, and one that could be a strong selling point for the T10. Sorry for neglecting to mention it in my earlier response.
The T10's screen is indeed also much sharper (double the pixels, as you noticed). This should help significantly in playback mode, in telling if the pictures you've taken are any good.
However, the majority of user reviews here and elsewhere (or if not a majority, at least a significant number) are harsh on the T10's image quality in general and particularly on its issues with red-eye and white spots when using flash (as you mentioned).
It seems to me that while the T10 wins out in most gadget-oriented areas, it loses pretty badly in image quality. In other words, all the image stabilization and LCD pixels in the world won't save you from red-eye or white spots, and they certainly won't compensate for subpar overall image quality. And isn't high image quality the real goal of any camera, anyway?
reply to this comment
The T10's screen is indeed also much sharper (double the pixels, as you noticed). This should help significantly in playback mode, in telling if the pictures you've taken are any good.
However, the majority of user reviews here and elsewhere (or if not a majority, at least a significant number) are harsh on the T10's image quality in general and particularly on its issues with red-eye and white spots when using flash (as you mentioned).
It seems to me that while the T10 wins out in most gadget-oriented areas, it loses pretty badly in image quality. In other words, all the image stabilization and LCD pixels in the world won't save you from red-eye or white spots, and they certainly won't compensate for subpar overall image quality. And isn't high image quality the real goal of any camera, anyway?
Alan Schamber (02/02/2007)
Hi Cagdas. What Ben is saying, it's true. The W100 is much better than the T10. But have you just though that you can buy not only Sony?
There are some cameras which have image stabilization, the same sensor size of the W100, the LCD quality of the T10, and the same stylish design in the T10.
Here there are some example of those:
* Pentax Optio A20
* Ricoh Caplio R5
* Canon PowerShot G7
Don't be focused only on Sony... because they are good in electrnic devices... but cameras needs other things than electronics.
Hope this helps you...
Alan.
reply to this comment
There are some cameras which have image stabilization, the same sensor size of the W100, the LCD quality of the T10, and the same stylish design in the T10.
Here there are some example of those:
* Pentax Optio A20
* Ricoh Caplio R5
* Canon PowerShot G7
Don't be focused only on Sony... because they are good in electrnic devices... but cameras needs other things than electronics.
Hope this helps you...
Alan.
bukit97 (02/12/2007)
Among the original points about T10 raised in your question, red eye is not specific to T10 alone.
If you read camera reviews, you will find many compacts have the same problem, and many tried ways and means to reduce it with varying degrees of success.
The white spots, as explained by Sony, only occurs under certain conditions, and the condition is where the environment is dusty.
Blurry pictures is partly due to the settings and partly due to the low light condition. After some practice, you will learn how to avoid blurry pictures.
All considered, including the image stabilisation and better resolution LCD screen, I would say go ahead and buy T10 if you like it.
reply to this comment
If you read camera reviews, you will find many compacts have the same problem, and many tried ways and means to reduce it with varying degrees of success.
The white spots, as explained by Sony, only occurs under certain conditions, and the condition is where the environment is dusty.
Blurry pictures is partly due to the settings and partly due to the low light condition. After some practice, you will learn how to avoid blurry pictures.
All considered, including the image stabilisation and better resolution LCD screen, I would say go ahead and buy T10 if you like it.
Ahmed Abou-Zeid (02/15/2007)
I prefer the W100
The only advantages for the T10 is a better resoloution LCD & image stablizer, but the W100 contains a bigger sensor and extra mega pixel
reply to this comment
The only advantages for the T10 is a better resoloution LCD & image stablizer, but the W100 contains a bigger sensor and extra mega pixel
is there a manual adjustment for flash exposure? (blazerdog — 01/31/2007)
Automatic flash options such as Flash On, Flash Off, or Slow Synchro are not enough to manage proper flash lighting on night time or indoor subjects. Too many shot are coming out with too much flash. Can I adjust this manually?
reply to this comment
bukit97 (01/31/2007)
W100 has a built in flash and Sony does not provide any options for users to control the flash light.
This is different from external flash where control is achieved by turning the flash gun at various angles to bounce the flash from the ceiling, white card, flash umbrellas or any other objects.
The best one can do, in the case of W100, is to paste papers of different degrees of transparencies on the flash light itself and holding it in position with cellophane tapes.
The paper reduces the amount of light falling on the subject and you have to experiment a bit with different thickness of paper to achieve the best result desired.
reply to this comment
This is different from external flash where control is achieved by turning the flash gun at various angles to bounce the flash from the ceiling, white card, flash umbrellas or any other objects.
The best one can do, in the case of W100, is to paste papers of different degrees of transparencies on the flash light itself and holding it in position with cellophane tapes.
The paper reduces the amount of light falling on the subject and you have to experiment a bit with different thickness of paper to achieve the best result desired.
Canon SD800 IS vs Sony Cybershot DSC W100, Can you tell me which one is good (kiran124 — 01/29/2007)
picture quality, white balance, focus.
reply to this comment
Joe (01/30/2007)
Simply put they are both excellent cameras. They are both super small and extremely high quality. Similar features so it basically comes down to perference. Most people like the Canon SD800 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) more because SD memory cards are cheaper and more universal than the required Sony memory stick. Both cameras have auto focus and white balance. The Sony w100 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) only has better picture quality if you are blowing out your stills to much larger than 8X10.
The Canon does have the best image stablization system out there too. I would go Canon for this reason and Memory card prices.
Good Luck
reply to this comment
The Canon does have the best image stablization system out there too. I would go Canon for this reason and Memory card prices.
Good Luck
Kiran (01/31/2007)
From reviews i came to know that the CCD of Canon SD800 is not good in capturing light, so it has problem in shooting at low light/indoor as compared to Sony W100 which is good in this.
The photo quality is dropped than as compared to Canon's older version SD700. The image shows softness at edges and corner. less sharpness anything above ISO100.
Canon's DIGIC III processor's heavy noise reduction blurring away fine, contrast at higher ISO 200 and above.
It ove rexposes when shooting in bright,contrasty situation.
i have not seen review for Sony W100 intensively. But the few i have seen i think Sony W100 has red eye problem. As truly said the batteries/memory card are expensive. Memory card not universal.
Can you suggest me on this reviews/problems.
reply to this comment
The photo quality is dropped than as compared to Canon's older version SD700. The image shows softness at edges and corner. less sharpness anything above ISO100.
Canon's DIGIC III processor's heavy noise reduction blurring away fine, contrast at higher ISO 200 and above.
It ove rexposes when shooting in bright,contrasty situation.
i have not seen review for Sony W100 intensively. But the few i have seen i think Sony W100 has red eye problem. As truly said the batteries/memory card are expensive. Memory card not universal.
Can you suggest me on this reviews/problems.
Matt (05/02/2007)
Read www.dpreview.com for the Canon SD800IS. It's true there is a SLIGHT softness to the edges, but only if you're going to magnify your pictures 10-fold. For 4x6" and occasional 8x10" pictures, the SD800IS will be perfectly fine. The optical image stabilization that Canon has is top-notch, and will allow you to shoot at IS100-200 in low-light situations, letting you get those hard-to-take pictures without the pictures getting too noisy.
If you buy a Sony-anything, expect to add another $100 in a couple 2GB cards.
reply to this comment
If you buy a Sony-anything, expect to add another $100 in a couple 2GB cards.
Matt (07/20/2007)
Ready to close on this question, or do you need anything else, Kiran?
reply to this comment
What is the best camera for taking pictures of kids & that has a good shutter speed & stabilization? (JMCMAHEL — 01/23/2007)
I want to take pictures of my kids & need a camera that has a fast shutter speed. The one I currently have (FUJI) has a big delay and by the time it takes the picture my kids have already moved a coupleof times. I'm also interested in a camera that has stabilization due to kids moving all the time & ending up w/blurred photos. I also want a camera that takes movie clips so I don't have to use my video camera. Please let me know what you can recommend.
reply to this comment
Joe (01/24/2007)
If you have a large budget I would suggest the Sony H5 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) because of its quick shutter speed and excellent image stablization. But it is a much bulkier camera then most and it might be a bit more power then you need.
Another Sony camera that is probably better fitted is the Sony W100 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) it has everything you are looking for plus more.
Check out the user reviews, they are both excellent cameras.
Good luck!
reply to this comment
Another Sony camera that is probably better fitted is the Sony W100 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) it has everything you are looking for plus more.
Check out the user reviews, they are both excellent cameras.
Good luck!
tit0martinez (03/20/2007)
the Sony H5 has excellent movie quality but your problem with the blurred pictures due to kids moving wont be solved by the cameras image stabilization, this will only correct the shaking of your hand, if u want to freeze the image u will need to use a faster shutter speed which the H5 is really good at, if your problem is the time your camera takes tu focus before taking the pictures u will have to prefocus your picture (press the button halfway down)
reply to this comment
Matt (07/20/2007)
I noticed this question was in with the SD800IS group. Are you looking for a larger, bulky camera? Then the options Joe and tito mentioned are good picks. You can also consider the Canon EOS or Rebel camera, depending on your budget and how much power you really want.
If you're looking for an ultracompact camera with fast shutter speed, natural flesh tone, strong flash, image stabilization, wide-angle lens, long battery life, good movie quality and ability to use large-capacity memory cards, the SD800IS is a good choice, too. If you were to try this camera out in a store, I'd suggest just putting it on auto, taking a picture of a person, and notice how responsive the camera is, and how amazing the image of the person appears. Very natural coloring. Great camera.
reply to this comment
If you're looking for an ultracompact camera with fast shutter speed, natural flesh tone, strong flash, image stabilization, wide-angle lens, long battery life, good movie quality and ability to use large-capacity memory cards, the SD800IS is a good choice, too. If you were to try this camera out in a store, I'd suggest just putting it on auto, taking a picture of a person, and notice how responsive the camera is, and how amazing the image of the person appears. Very natural coloring. Great camera.
i own and love Sony DSCF707, Iwant a more compact camera, which one would you recommend? (Snaponlifer — 01/21/2007)
I am used to the Sony format and have tried out Other small camera's at best buy and thought that I would like another Sony but have heard horror stories about red eye and white marks. My DSCF707 takes professional quality photos. Can I get close to the smae quality with a smaller camera?
reply to this comment
Ben Keough (01/22/2007)
Hi Sheryl,
Have you considered the H5 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )? It's smaller than the F707 (but not exactly small) and very, very powerful. It's a 7MP, 12x optical zoom (with a nice image stabilization system), and has a beautiful 3" LCD.
If you want a very small camera, you might want to consider the N2 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) (10MP, 3x optical zoom, no image stabilization, very small, limited manual settings) or the W100 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) (8MP, 3x optical zoom, no image stabilization, full manual mode).
These are all good cameras. I'd try them out in-hand and see which feels best to you.
Hope this helps!
reply to this comment
Have you considered the H5 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )? It's smaller than the F707 (but not exactly small) and very, very powerful. It's a 7MP, 12x optical zoom (with a nice image stabilization system), and has a beautiful 3" LCD.
If you want a very small camera, you might want to consider the N2 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) (10MP, 3x optical zoom, no image stabilization, very small, limited manual settings) or the W100 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) (8MP, 3x optical zoom, no image stabilization, full manual mode).
These are all good cameras. I'd try them out in-hand and see which feels best to you.
Hope this helps!
What is the best overall camera in the $250 -300 range for family/vacation shots? (stacir — 01/17/2007)
I have had the Sony Cybershot 3.2 megapixels (model DSC-P5). I have had it a long time and am going on vacation soon. I was just going to buy the new Cybershot with 8.1 megapixels but was reading some complaints about the low lighting pictures which worried me. (I guess I was being too brand loyal!) The only complaints I have had with this camera are the lag time to take a picture (and between pictures) and the problem with taking low light pictures. These are the only reasons I am looking to buy a new camera. I take a lot of pictures of my daughters, and I want a camera that will take faster pictures so I don't have to make them sit & wait for the camera between shots. Also, I want it to be able to take low light pictures (ie: inside a restaurant). Lastly, my Sony has a rechargeable battery. I did replace it once. What are the benefits of AA batteries vs. this rechargeable kind?
Thanks for any advice!
reply to this comment
Thanks for any advice!
Joe (01/17/2007)
I would suggest the Sony W100 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) it has what you are looking for. No AA batts which can be a pain because AAs are easy to replace at any corner store if travelling. The packs last longer and recharge better.
reply to this comment
stacir (01/17/2007)
I had read from a few people who bought this camera that they had trouble taking shots with low lighting. Is there a special feature that helps with this that maybe these users didn't know about?
reply to this comment
when taking a video with the sony cyber shot 100w does it collect audio also (trever-roediger — 12/20/2006)
reply to this comment
Ben Keough (12/20/2006)
Hi Trever,
Yes, the W100 records with full sound at all recording settings.
Good luck!
reply to this comment
Yes, the W100 records with full sound at all recording settings.
Good luck!
Which sony dg cam model gives optimum pixel & zoom for best price (within 15000/-) ? (syg018 — 12/14/2006)
Which sony dg cam model gives optimum pixel & zoom for best price (within 15000/-) ?
reply to this comment
Ben Keough (12/14/2006)
Hi Seema,
Within 15000 what?
Anyway, Sony doesn't offer many cheaper cameras with high zoom, but they do offer plenty with lots of megapixels. If you're looking to keep costs lower I'd recommend the W100 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), which is 8 megapixels and has a 3x optical zoom. If you can spend a little more, I'd go for the H5 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), which is bigger, has a 7 megapixel sensor, and offers a 12x stabilized optical zoom. The W100 is more point and shoot, the H5 is a more serious camera. Your pick.
Good luck!
reply to this comment
Within 15000 what?
Anyway, Sony doesn't offer many cheaper cameras with high zoom, but they do offer plenty with lots of megapixels. If you're looking to keep costs lower I'd recommend the W100 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), which is 8 megapixels and has a 3x optical zoom. If you can spend a little more, I'd go for the H5 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), which is bigger, has a 7 megapixel sensor, and offers a 12x stabilized optical zoom. The W100 is more point and shoot, the H5 is a more serious camera. Your pick.
Good luck!
Sarah (12/21/2006)
Sony and Minolta recently teamed up to create the Alpha digital SLR, with 10 mega-pixels and a zoom that is limited only by your choice of lens, this camera is truely your best bet. This camera also gives you the option of saving your pictures in several file formats including RAW. This format gives users the ability to control color and various manual settings even after the picture has been taken. The W100, is nice with 8 mega pixels and a high ISO, allowing great shots in low light (a feature sony is known for), and the H5 is nice for most users, but both of these models offer much slower shutter speeds and take considerably longer to record to the memory card. Which leads to another good feature of the Alpha which is the ability to use either the Pro Duo memory card, which is used in most Sony cameras, or a Compact Flash.
reply to this comment
Hemant (01/09/2007)
Hi...
i want a digital camera with best zoom and megapixel....
tell me the best and in lower rate...
if its possible can i buy on the installment...
reply to this comment
i want a digital camera with best zoom and megapixel....
tell me the best and in lower rate...
if its possible can i buy on the installment...
Is sony Sony CyberShot DSC-W100 good camera ?(high-quality images and film are important 4 me) (salehsnk — 12/10/2006)
high-quality images and film are important 4 me
reply to this comment
Ben Keough (12/10/2006)
Hi SNK,
Yes, the W100 is a fine camera. It's been rated extremely well by users and pro reviewers alike, and it has good specs to back those reviews up. As you can see from the user reviews ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) here at DCHQ, image quality is one of the qualities most often praised by owners. Furthermore, it's very reasonably priced compared to many of its competitors. You'd do very well to choose this camera. Good luck!
reply to this comment
Yes, the W100 is a fine camera. It's been rated extremely well by users and pro reviewers alike, and it has good specs to back those reviews up. As you can see from the user reviews ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) here at DCHQ, image quality is one of the qualities most often praised by owners. Furthermore, it's very reasonably priced compared to many of its competitors. You'd do very well to choose this camera. Good luck!
can't decide between Sony w-50 and Canon SD600--HELP!!! (cboyd1954 — 12/04/2006)
reply to this comment
Joe (12/05/2006)
hmm both excellent cameras. The amazing part about the SD600 is its size. I have used this camera it really is tiny. So if you want a pocket sized camera this one is propbaby smaller than you wallet. The Sony is good but I feel it is a bit dated and sony's w100 is a more a better choice if you want to go Sony.
reply to this comment
Brenda Paro (12/07/2006)
I'd swing for the Sony W100 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) that Joe mentioned. More pixels and slightly more advanced camera for not much more money. Downside is that it's not as small as the Canon, but then again the Canon Elphs like the SD600 have issues with the LCD breaking, they can be fragile.
reply to this comment
cboyd1954 (12/08/2006)
thank you very much... i'll check out the W100
charlie
reply to this comment
charlie
John M (12/13/2006)
Be careful with the Canon compacts's are fragile and watch out for the dreaded E18 error ...
reply to this comment
cboyd1954 (12/13/2006)
Thanks for all your feedback. I've purchased the W100. I'm not sure how to un-post this request now???
thank you all very much,
charlie
reply to this comment
thank you all very much,
charlie
Brenda Paro (12/13/2006)
No problem, Charlie. If you want, you can mark one of the answers as "Best Answer" and that will close out the question. We will leave it up here for people who have similar questions in the future to use as reference. Also, feel free to come back and let us know how the W100 works out for you, I'd like to hear how it goes!
reply to this comment
cboyd1954 (01/28/2007)
Thanks so much. I chose Brenda P as the most helpful, but all of you were great!
reply to this comment
How can I clean the dust inside the lens of a non-DSLR camera? (Gunbard — 12/01/2006)
The vacuum cleaner approach didn't seem to work at all. The image has annoyingly visible, but hardly noticable large spots whenever zoomed at 3x optical.
reply to this comment
Brenda Paro (12/01/2006)
The issue with dust inside of a camera with a non-removable lens is that, it rarely gets in there because the lens doesn't come off; but if it does get in there, it's very hard to remove. You might have to take this to a professional camera shop so they can take it apart and remove the dust.
reply to this comment
my T7 was stolen, Im now looking to upgrade,which cam do i go for? (R-A-C-hel — 11/29/2006)
I need a new replacement. Pretty open minded. Im tempted by the Samsung NV10, but not sure as ive read mixed reviews. I dont really want anything larger than the NV10. Im not really a camera expert so i tended not to use all the functions and adjusments on the T7. Theres so much choice out there, please help!!
reply to this comment
Ben Keough (11/29/2006)
Hi Rachel,
Sorry to hear about your stolen camera.
The NV10 has sort of a split critical consensus--lots of people love its design and features, but have issues with the quality of images it puts out. Check out the reviews at Amazon ( amazon.com/Samsung-NV10-Dig... ) for an example of this sort of reaction.
Personally, I'd recommend the Canon A640 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) (or its little brother the A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )). It's got roughly the same feature set as the NV10 with a few added bonuses (flip-out LCD, longer zoom, etc) and a much more solid critical reaction. Everyone seems to love this camera. It is, however, a little larger than the NV10, mainly in thickness. If you really need to go small, check out the Canon SD800 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), which is comparable in most categories to the NV10 and A640 (fewer megapixels, though) and also features optical image stabilization, which will save a lot of shots that would otherwise be lost to motion blur.
Hope this helps. :)
reply to this comment
Sorry to hear about your stolen camera.
The NV10 has sort of a split critical consensus--lots of people love its design and features, but have issues with the quality of images it puts out. Check out the reviews at Amazon ( amazon.com/Samsung-NV10-Dig... ) for an example of this sort of reaction.
Personally, I'd recommend the Canon A640 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) (or its little brother the A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )). It's got roughly the same feature set as the NV10 with a few added bonuses (flip-out LCD, longer zoom, etc) and a much more solid critical reaction. Everyone seems to love this camera. It is, however, a little larger than the NV10, mainly in thickness. If you really need to go small, check out the Canon SD800 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), which is comparable in most categories to the NV10 and A640 (fewer megapixels, though) and also features optical image stabilization, which will save a lot of shots that would otherwise be lost to motion blur.
Hope this helps. :)
R-A-C-hel (11/29/2006)
Hi! thanks for the response. Yes the loss of my T7 HURT!
ALOT ALOT of the pix I took with the T7 were on nights out with friends, and the fact that Ive had such a slimline camera in my hands kind of makes me reluctant to go much bigger.
Ive also never printed my shots. Theyve all been for email and online use.
What do u recommend as the best of the Sony Cybershot series?
And does your choice fair better than any of the Casio Exilims?
Im going on vacation next month and need to buy it soon, just so baffled with all the choice.
Thanks so much for ur advice.
reply to this comment
ALOT ALOT of the pix I took with the T7 were on nights out with friends, and the fact that Ive had such a slimline camera in my hands kind of makes me reluctant to go much bigger.
Ive also never printed my shots. Theyve all been for email and online use.
What do u recommend as the best of the Sony Cybershot series?
And does your choice fair better than any of the Casio Exilims?
Im going on vacation next month and need to buy it soon, just so baffled with all the choice.
Thanks so much for ur advice.
Ben Keough (11/29/2006)
Rachel,
As far as Sonys go, the top-rated ultra-compacts seem to be the T9 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) (the newer T10 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) seems to have some serious issues with pictures using flash) and, a little bigger but still smaller than the Canon A-series I mentioned, the W100 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). It's about 4mm bigger than the T9 in all dimensions--not bad.
In the Casio range I'd check out the EX-Z70, which is pretty feature-packed and rated well by users.
reply to this comment
As far as Sonys go, the top-rated ultra-compacts seem to be the T9 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) (the newer T10 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) seems to have some serious issues with pictures using flash) and, a little bigger but still smaller than the Canon A-series I mentioned, the W100 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). It's about 4mm bigger than the T9 in all dimensions--not bad.
In the Casio range I'd check out the EX-Z70, which is pretty feature-packed and rated well by users.
I would like to buy a camera which are small, reasonable and high resolution as well as best photo. Any suggestion? (Shirley — 11/27/2006)
I am looking for a camera which will have a good result of photo. My main point are small, good quality of photo and reasonable. I dont mind if the camera are not the latest edition, as far as the camera is always a best choice for camera seekers. Finally, i think i personally more prefer sony, panasonic and canon without any reason.
reply to this comment
Andrew Skinner (11/28/2006)
Shirley,
The Sony T10 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is a great choice. If you like that, you might want to look at the Panasonic FX50 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), the Canon SD40 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), the Panasonic FX07 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), and the Sony W100 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). All have very similar capabilities and are priced the same or lower than the Sony T10 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). I would recommend going in to a retailer and holding the cameras to see what you're comfortable with in your hand before purchasing. This will ensure a good fit for you.
Andrew
reply to this comment
The Sony T10 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is a great choice. If you like that, you might want to look at the Panasonic FX50 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), the Canon SD40 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), the Panasonic FX07 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), and the Sony W100 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). All have very similar capabilities and are priced the same or lower than the Sony T10 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). I would recommend going in to a retailer and holding the cameras to see what you're comfortable with in your hand before purchasing. This will ensure a good fit for you.
Andrew
DELETING PHOTOS FROM SONY DSC W100 CYBERSHOT VIEWER (WOLFBROTHER3 — 11/24/2006)
Sony DSC W100
I have installed the software for the camera, but cannot figure out how to delete the unwanted photos from the viewer software that came with the camera. Also, after installing the software onto my computer, it grabbed hold of pictures from my hard drive that was either sent to me in email or downloaded from the Internet. I only want pictures in the Sony software that I have taken with this camera. How can I control what it grabs from my hard drive?
Thanks!
Dave
reply to this comment
I have installed the software for the camera, but cannot figure out how to delete the unwanted photos from the viewer software that came with the camera. Also, after installing the software onto my computer, it grabbed hold of pictures from my hard drive that was either sent to me in email or downloaded from the Internet. I only want pictures in the Sony software that I have taken with this camera. How can I control what it grabs from my hard drive?
Thanks!
Dave
Ben Keough (11/25/2006)
Hi Dave,
First of all, I'd recommend not using the software Sony packages with the camera. Like most manufacturer-created software packages, it's pretty mediocre. There are lots of alternatives for photo management. For example, Google's Picasa software ( picasa.google.com/ ) is free and superior to any camera-included software I've ever used.
Second, according to this FAQ ( sonydigital-link.com/DIME/F... ) on Sony's European site, you cannot delete photos from Cybershot Viewer. Instead, use Windows Explorer to delete the file.
Finally, I can't find any information on how to keep CyberShot Viewer from importing images other than the ones you've taken. This is likely one of the failings of the software, but you might want to search the software's help to double check.
Good luck!
reply to this comment
First of all, I'd recommend not using the software Sony packages with the camera. Like most manufacturer-created software packages, it's pretty mediocre. There are lots of alternatives for photo management. For example, Google's Picasa software ( picasa.google.com/ ) is free and superior to any camera-included software I've ever used.
Second, according to this FAQ ( sonydigital-link.com/DIME/F... ) on Sony's European site, you cannot delete photos from Cybershot Viewer. Instead, use Windows Explorer to delete the file.
Finally, I can't find any information on how to keep CyberShot Viewer from importing images other than the ones you've taken. This is likely one of the failings of the software, but you might want to search the software's help to double check.
Good luck!
WOLFBROTHER3 (11/25/2006)
Hi Ben!
Thank you for the answer, just after I submitted the question, I did delete the software from the computer. I will download Picasa and once again, many thanks for the help!
Dave
reply to this comment
Thank you for the answer, just after I submitted the question, I did delete the software from the computer. I will download Picasa and once again, many thanks for the help!
Dave
Ben Keough (11/25/2006)
No problem. Hope it works out for you. :)
reply to this comment
tina (04/07/2007)
hello ben k
thank u for the suggestions... u are a great help :-)
reply to this comment
thank u for the suggestions... u are a great help :-)
eric (06/07/2007)
I am on vacation and all of a sudden all my pictures i have taken has been deleted! i attempted to delete one but the whole trip got erased. i am so upset. is there anyway to see if i can retrieve them? i find it hard to believe i deleted ALL my pictures from the trip with the press of a single button.
reply to this comment
Felix (06/24/2007)
I have been trying to delete a 'folder' from the cybershot system without success. I go to the web and see this is not just a problem for me.
I followed the directions (I thought) to update to Ver. 1.0, which had been suggested on a site like this. Seemed like a good idea at the time.............it deleted the file and a lot more; changed the format from mysterious blank squares with red x s to mysterious fields with grey x s and the whole thing makes even less sense than before.
Anyone?
Thanks
Is the only solution to delete the cybershot software entirely (Hoping that you had all those photos in Picassa too- I'm not sure....) and just use Picassa?
For some reason, when I got the camera I assumed I needed to install their software to interface with the camera.
reply to this comment
I followed the directions (I thought) to update to Ver. 1.0, which had been suggested on a site like this. Seemed like a good idea at the time.............it deleted the file and a lot more; changed the format from mysterious blank squares with red x s to mysterious fields with grey x s and the whole thing makes even less sense than before.
Anyone?
Thanks
Is the only solution to delete the cybershot software entirely (Hoping that you had all those photos in Picassa too- I'm not sure....) and just use Picassa?
For some reason, when I got the camera I assumed I needed to install their software to interface with the camera.
Mary (11/11/2007)
Hello!
I've bought a used digital camera on e-bay so I'm trying to download the pics onto my computer but I can't do it because my computer recognizes the memory stick as a removable disk, I called a representative from my computer guarrantive because i thought was my computer so he told me that my computer is working right and what I need is the software, so I don't have it....what can i do? any other programs could I use?
I have a Sony dsc-w100.
if somebody could help me I'll appreciate it.........
reply to this comment
I've bought a used digital camera on e-bay so I'm trying to download the pics onto my computer but I can't do it because my computer recognizes the memory stick as a removable disk, I called a representative from my computer guarrantive because i thought was my computer so he told me that my computer is working right and what I need is the software, so I don't have it....what can i do? any other programs could I use?
I have a Sony dsc-w100.
if somebody could help me I'll appreciate it.........
Cesar (10/30/2008)
Hi all:
Where can I find the cyber-shot viewer?.. I lost the original CD and my software is corrupted.
Thanks!!!
reply to this comment
Where can I find the cyber-shot viewer?.. I lost the original CD and my software is corrupted.
Thanks!!!
Norman Lottering (10/11/2009)
How can I delete Images/photos from the cyber-shot veiwer sofyware. It only allows me to hide the photo?
I have saved the photo on CD, but am unable to delete the photo from my PC?
reply to this comment
I have saved the photo on CD, but am unable to delete the photo from my PC?
ahmed (10/30/2009)
Hi all
whin i turn on wrid in LCD masesh
Turn the power aff and on again
I have a Sony dsc-w100.
thanks
reply to this comment
whin i turn on wrid in LCD masesh
Turn the power aff and on again
I have a Sony dsc-w100.
thanks
Kevin Beitz (12/26/2009)
Hook up your camera to your system... Open windows explore... Look in the directory for your cameras directory ... Copy the pictures to a new file on your hard drive... Disconnect the camera from the computer... Turn on the camera and select view... push the delete button on you camera... Push the wide angle button on your camera.... Select delete all...
You got it...
reply to this comment
You got it...
trying to decide between canon powershot sd800 & sony cyber shot dcs w100 for my 16 year old son (ttruby2 — 11/19/2006)
my son started with a kodak easy share, he has expressed an interest in getting more involved in photography. i want to get him a decent camera, he liked a friend's sony cyber shot dsc w100. when i went to the store to see them, the salesman also recommended the canon power shot sd800. i dont know much about camera so im looking for some help before i make a decision. thanks
reply to this comment
Ben Keough (11/20/2006)
Theresa,
Since you've mentioned these two specific cameras, let's start with them first.
Both the Powershot SD800 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) and the CyberShot W100 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) are excellent cameras. Both have excellent resolution, zoom, and extra features. There are, of course, small differences. The SD800 IS, for example, includes image stabilization. This means that if your hand moves when you press the shutter release, or if other environmental factors affect the stability of your shot, the camera compensates to provide a clearer, sharper image. On the other hand, the W100 beats the SD800 by 1 megapixel. This won't make that big of a difference in anything except printing, where it will allow the W100 to produce slightly larger prints. The SD800's zoom is slightly longer and it offers a larger ISO range; the W100's shutter speed range is a little wider and it's several dollars cheaper. There are tons of little differences between the two, but the short answer is that either one would be a wonderful camera for someone looking for a top of the line compact point and shoot camera.
If your son is seriously interested in photography, however, I'd recommend stepping up from the compact range to what's called a "prosumer" camera. For the same price as either of the above cameras (or perhaps a little more) you could easily get him a prosumer rig. You can identify prosumer cameras by their shape (they look like SLRs with fixed lenses) or by their features in comparison to most compacts. In general, they bridge the gap between point and shoot consumer models and the professional SLRs. Some common features of prosumer machines are extended, stabilized zoom (see: Canon's S2 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) and S3 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )), many manual controls (aperture, exposure levels, manual zoom, etc) unavailable on consumer models, and the capacity for add-on lenses, hoods, flashes and other accessories. In general, prosumer cameras are bigger and heavier than their consumer counterparts, but the bump up in features makes them worth it for many.
This question really comes down to how serious you think he is about photography. If he's really interested in fiddling with minute setting adjustments to get that perfect exposure, or to create an interesting effect, a prosumer model might be the right move to make. If he just wants to take nice snapshots and carry the camera in his pocket, there are tons of great solutions in the consumer realm. Good luck making your choice.
reply to this comment
Since you've mentioned these two specific cameras, let's start with them first.
Both the Powershot SD800 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) and the CyberShot W100 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) are excellent cameras. Both have excellent resolution, zoom, and extra features. There are, of course, small differences. The SD800 IS, for example, includes image stabilization. This means that if your hand moves when you press the shutter release, or if other environmental factors affect the stability of your shot, the camera compensates to provide a clearer, sharper image. On the other hand, the W100 beats the SD800 by 1 megapixel. This won't make that big of a difference in anything except printing, where it will allow the W100 to produce slightly larger prints. The SD800's zoom is slightly longer and it offers a larger ISO range; the W100's shutter speed range is a little wider and it's several dollars cheaper. There are tons of little differences between the two, but the short answer is that either one would be a wonderful camera for someone looking for a top of the line compact point and shoot camera.
If your son is seriously interested in photography, however, I'd recommend stepping up from the compact range to what's called a "prosumer" camera. For the same price as either of the above cameras (or perhaps a little more) you could easily get him a prosumer rig. You can identify prosumer cameras by their shape (they look like SLRs with fixed lenses) or by their features in comparison to most compacts. In general, they bridge the gap between point and shoot consumer models and the professional SLRs. Some common features of prosumer machines are extended, stabilized zoom (see: Canon's S2 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) and S3 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )), many manual controls (aperture, exposure levels, manual zoom, etc) unavailable on consumer models, and the capacity for add-on lenses, hoods, flashes and other accessories. In general, prosumer cameras are bigger and heavier than their consumer counterparts, but the bump up in features makes them worth it for many.
This question really comes down to how serious you think he is about photography. If he's really interested in fiddling with minute setting adjustments to get that perfect exposure, or to create an interesting effect, a prosumer model might be the right move to make. If he just wants to take nice snapshots and carry the camera in his pocket, there are tons of great solutions in the consumer realm. Good luck making your choice.
Does this camera have a sports function? (Aubrey — 11/13/2006)
I need to take pictures of moving horses and soccer games. So the camera needs to have a sports function so that the pictures are not blurry.
reply to this comment
Joe (11/14/2006)
This camera do not have a specific "Sport Mode" but it does have many settings that will help you get blur free pictures like image stablization and high sensitivity (1250 ISO) mode. As long as you have decent light you will get great action shots with this camera.
reply to this comment
Is this a good replacement for a Canon S400? (Lily — 11/11/2006)
My Canon S400 is dying. I'm not yet ready to move beyond a compact model. Would getting this Sony W100 be upgrading or downgrading? What features would I lose out on?
reply to this comment
Andrew Skinner (11/14/2006)
Lily,
This camera doubles the megapixels of your old Canon, so the resolution will be a lot better in your photos. Zoom capabilities are comparible, it will perform in lower light situations better with an ISO setting of 1000 vs 400 on the Canon, and the LCD is an inch bigger, so you will be able to preview your photos better too. This would be a definite upgrade without losing any of the functionality of your old Canon.
Andrew
reply to this comment
This camera doubles the megapixels of your old Canon, so the resolution will be a lot better in your photos. Zoom capabilities are comparible, it will perform in lower light situations better with an ISO setting of 1000 vs 400 on the Canon, and the LCD is an inch bigger, so you will be able to preview your photos better too. This would be a definite upgrade without losing any of the functionality of your old Canon.
Andrew
Lily (11/15/2006)
Well, what I'm really concerned about is some manual controls. Does it have any good ones? The megapixels aren't my biggest concern at the moment. I've been reading and some people don't seem quite impressed with the highest ISO settings so I'm also wondering if I'd even be using it.
thanks
reply to this comment
thanks
Andrew Skinner (11/19/2006)
Lily,
The high ISO settings are great for indoor use and low light settings. You will find some noise or graininess in the photos you take at that level, but basic photo software can take that out easily.
In regards to the manual controls: the camera does have a manual focus option, but only comes with auto exposure. The focus will be nice for DoF pictures, but you won't be able to control the light exposure as much. You can play with the exposure by setting the camera to the various white balance settings and the different scene modes, but thats it. Good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
reply to this comment
The high ISO settings are great for indoor use and low light settings. You will find some noise or graininess in the photos you take at that level, but basic photo software can take that out easily.
In regards to the manual controls: the camera does have a manual focus option, but only comes with auto exposure. The focus will be nice for DoF pictures, but you won't be able to control the light exposure as much. You can play with the exposure by setting the camera to the various white balance settings and the different scene modes, but thats it. Good luck and happy shooting.
Andrew
Lily (11/19/2006)
Thanks Andrew! I'm at the moment dreaming of a Canon G7 or maybe even an entry level SLR.
But thanks! :)
reply to this comment
But thanks! :)
Andrew Skinner (11/19/2006)
I am already shooting in the <a href="digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... realm</a> and loving it. The versatility you have with the various lenses and settings is outstanding for <a href="blackdoorphotos.deviantart.... I won't turn back.
Andrew
reply to this comment
Andrew
Lily (11/19/2006)
But how is it for amateur-sometime-ish photography!
I like the Espresso...but is the S2 SLR? or was that pre-SLR?
S3 IS sounds nice...
thanks for your many replies!
reply to this comment
I like the Espresso...but is the S2 SLR? or was that pre-SLR?
S3 IS sounds nice...
thanks for your many replies!
Andrew Skinner (11/19/2006)
The S2 is not SLR, but isn't bad for an extended zoom. I branched into the SLR shortly after I shot that. No worries on the replies, contact me ( blackdoorphotos.com/ ) anytime.
reply to this comment
Lily (11/19/2006)
thanks!
reply to this comment
Hi, I have a SOny T7 which has been a huge disappointment. (Arhant — 11/11/2006)
Im looking for a Camera that is good at low light and night time conditions, esp during school plays and theatre moments!
reply to this comment
Joe (11/21/2006)
I would recommend the Sony W100 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) because not only does it have an ISO rating of 1000 which is great for low light without getting much noise but it also has great imagestablization. So your low light shows will be blur free, when used correctly. Low light shots can easily be made blurry by an unsteady hand the image stablization cuts down on that a great deal. Best shots possible with a tripod. Plus this is an all around great camera.
reply to this comment
Norm (11/25/2006)
The Sony DSC-W100 does NOT have image stabilization.
It has high ISO and fast shutter speed to reduce blurring in low light conditions.
reply to this comment
It has high ISO and fast shutter speed to reduce blurring in low light conditions.
Ben Keough (12/15/2006)
Hi, I noticed that you haven't marked any replies as the "best answer." Are you still looking for an answer? If so, I recommend you re-submit it on digitalcamera-hq.com so it will have a better chance of being noticed. These days it looks like most questions are being answered within a few days. Good luck!
reply to this comment
Arhant (02/05/2007)
Thanks Ben!
reply to this comment
i want to buy a camera having resolution >8 Mega pixel (not effective) and a high optical zoom alongwith carl zeiss lens? (Rajarshi — 11/10/2006)
Well i live in India. So i suggest one that's available here. The camera should not be too bulky.
reply to this comment
Joe (11/21/2006)
Here are two options:
The Sony Cybershot DSC-R1 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) which is a very powerful camera and is fairly bulky.
or the Sony W100 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) which has everything you are looking for except a larger zoom. The W100 only has a 3xoptical zoom, it is high quality but not very long.
The w100 is probably your best option.
reply to this comment
The Sony Cybershot DSC-R1 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) which is a very powerful camera and is fairly bulky.
or the Sony W100 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) which has everything you are looking for except a larger zoom. The W100 only has a 3xoptical zoom, it is high quality but not very long.
The w100 is probably your best option.
What are the differences in the Kodak P712 & the P880? (Tamela Hobbs — 11/10/2006)
I am looking for a good camera to take quality pictures, but do not know enough about the cameras to make a decision between the P712 & P880. I definately want a camera that will eliminate red eye if possible. I do want to be able to shoot quality pictures with excellent clarity & color. Can anyone help an amatuer like me.
reply to this comment
Joe (11/21/2006)
Well these are pretty large cameras. I would recommend something more like the Sony w100 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) which takes great pictures, has red eye reduction, and image stablization. Plus it can fit in your pocket and is very easy to use.
reply to this comment
Joe Kashi (12/03/2006)
Depends on the focal length range that you want. The P800 is very wide to moderate telephoto (24mm to 140 mm equivalent). The P712 is moderate wideangle to very long telephoto. Image sharpness is better with the P880. I personally prefer a very wide angle option and the sharpest possible shots, so I opt for th P880. We have a P880 and often use it in preference to our larger Sony R1, which has a similar 24-120 mm focal range. We really like the handling of the P880. BTW - Always use the RAW file format option - JPEG compresses too much in all modes for best image quality. Also, be sure to get get enough exposure on the sensor - the P880 gets noisy when images are underexposed.
reply to this comment
What about the computer's operating system requirements ? ? ? (Dave — 11/09/2006)
can I use it with my iMac G5/10.4 OS?
reply to this comment
Lily (11/11/2006)
On Sony's website: sonystyle.com/is-bin/INTERS... listed Operating System compatibility is:
Microsoft® 2000 Professional, Me, XP Home and Professional; Macintosh® OS 9.1/9.2/OS X (10.0-10.4)
So, yes you should be able to use it on your mac. I have a mac and wouldn't be worried that it won't work.
reply to this comment
Microsoft® 2000 Professional, Me, XP Home and Professional; Macintosh® OS 9.1/9.2/OS X (10.0-10.4)
So, yes you should be able to use it on your mac. I have a mac and wouldn't be worried that it won't work.
I currently own a sony cybershot DSC-P50 -looking to upgrade (jrn — 11/06/2006)
not sure if I should stick with sony or try a new brand- I take mostly pictures of my toddler so I need a camera that can keep up with him- looking to spend about $300
reply to this comment
Joe (11/07/2006)
Well if you do want to stay with Sony the W100 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is awesome. My favorite compac camera out right now, all good features, lack of zoom, but it makes up for it with size and preformance. Durable too.
If you want to try another great brand the Canon SD700 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) which is a similar camera, less megapixels (6MP), but great image stablization which is great for kids.
Both takes wonderful pics, check out the user reviews to totally sell you.
reply to this comment
If you want to try another great brand the Canon SD700 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) which is a similar camera, less megapixels (6MP), but great image stablization which is great for kids.
Both takes wonderful pics, check out the user reviews to totally sell you.
how many minutes can sony w 100 record vedio (tamer elmowafy — 11/05/2006)
reply to this comment
tamer elmowafy (11/05/2006)
40 minutes
reply to this comment
Brenda Paro (11/22/2006)
It will depend on the memory you have and what resolution you're shooting at.
reply to this comment
please compare sony cyber shot 8.1 to canon sd 630 (Goerges — 11/05/2006)
the 2 are the same price and we are new to digital photography.
looking for simple and reliable
we travel to various destinations
reply to this comment
looking for simple and reliable
we travel to various destinations
Andrew Skinner (11/07/2006)
Goerges,
There are a few differences between the two cameras. Both will be simple and reliable, but you just have to ask what is more important to you. The differences below list the Canon SD630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) first.
-Megapixels: 6 vs 8.1
The larger number will allow for clearer photos
-The Canon SD630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) offers manual exposure settings for more advanced photo taking, and custom light levels while the Sony W100 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) does not.
-ISO Settings: 80-800 vs 100-1000
A higher ISO setting is more ideal for low light settings. The difference between the two cameras is minimal though.
-LCD Display: 3.0" vs 2.5"
This is only if you want a larger display on the back of the camera.
The Canon SD630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) does cost less, but the Sony W100 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) will have the greater resolution. Its really a toss up for what you want to do with your pictures. I hope the comparison has helped.
Andrew
reply to this comment
There are a few differences between the two cameras. Both will be simple and reliable, but you just have to ask what is more important to you. The differences below list the Canon SD630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) first.
-Megapixels: 6 vs 8.1
The larger number will allow for clearer photos
-The Canon SD630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) offers manual exposure settings for more advanced photo taking, and custom light levels while the Sony W100 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) does not.
-ISO Settings: 80-800 vs 100-1000
A higher ISO setting is more ideal for low light settings. The difference between the two cameras is minimal though.
-LCD Display: 3.0" vs 2.5"
This is only if you want a larger display on the back of the camera.
The Canon SD630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) does cost less, but the Sony W100 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) will have the greater resolution. Its really a toss up for what you want to do with your pictures. I hope the comparison has helped.
Andrew
Goerges (11/07/2006)
Thanks Andrew
We appreciate the feedback but have since come up with new issues
How much value is there to antishake and a little more Zoom.
A nikon coolpix L5 is now a comparable price contender.
reply to this comment
We appreciate the feedback but have since come up with new issues
How much value is there to antishake and a little more Zoom.
A nikon coolpix L5 is now a comparable price contender.
Andrew Skinner (11/12/2006)
Goerges,
The Nikon L5 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) has 7.2 megapixels, 5x optical zoom (the other two have 3) and vibration reduction. These are great options, but you do not have the manual exposure and focus (for more advanced shots). This camera might actually better for what you're looking for.
Andrew
reply to this comment
The Nikon L5 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) has 7.2 megapixels, 5x optical zoom (the other two have 3) and vibration reduction. These are great options, but you do not have the manual exposure and focus (for more advanced shots). This camera might actually better for what you're looking for.
Andrew
Sony Digital For Work (SteveDemers — 11/01/2006)
I want to take pictures of properties. The camera will be in my soft briefcase and might get banged around. Addionally, I would like to transfer picts easily to my PC.
reply to this comment
Joe (11/01/2006)
The Sony W100 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is the best small Sony for what you are looking for. It is compact and durable, just take care of the screen. This camera has great features and takes nice big high resolution pics. Easy PC connect as any camera. Great choice.
reply to this comment
best $300 digital camera (andrew in colorado — 11/01/2006)
most mp fot the $$; features; auto/manual focus
reply to this comment
Joe (11/01/2006)
I would have to say the best camera for under $300 is the Sony W100 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). Talk about fully loaded. I love this camera, it is tiny, it has manual focus, 8.3MP, great lens, and it comes in black!!! which makes most tech gadgets cooler.
Excellent camera.
reply to this comment
Excellent camera.
Brenda Paro (12/06/2006)
Hi there,
I noticed you haven't yet marked a "Best Answer"... are you still looking for help? If so, I recommend re-submitting your question on digitalcamera-hq.com so it has a better chance of being noticed. Lately it looks like questions are being answered within just one or two days. Good luck!
reply to this comment
I noticed you haven't yet marked a "Best Answer"... are you still looking for help? If so, I recommend re-submitting your question on digitalcamera-hq.com so it has a better chance of being noticed. Lately it looks like questions are being answered within just one or two days. Good luck!
which is better, canon powershot a630 or sony dsc-w100 cyber shot? (danielle — 10/28/2006)
i need a multi purpose camera for vacation, sporting events, & family photo's w/8 magapixels.
reply to this comment
Brenda Paro (10/29/2006)
Hi Danielle,
I would go with the A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), but that is really just because I like the Powershots.
Compared to the Cybershot W100 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), the A630 has a lot of the same features- they both have movie mode with sound, 2.5-inch LCDs, and a nice combo of manual and auto controls. The A630 has a 4x optical zoom compared to the Sony's 3x zoom, but the Sony probably takes low light pictures a little better than the Canon. So it's mainly up to you.
reply to this comment
I would go with the A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), but that is really just because I like the Powershots.
Compared to the Cybershot W100 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), the A630 has a lot of the same features- they both have movie mode with sound, 2.5-inch LCDs, and a nice combo of manual and auto controls. The A630 has a 4x optical zoom compared to the Sony's 3x zoom, but the Sony probably takes low light pictures a little better than the Canon. So it's mainly up to you.
danielle (10/30/2006)
hi brenda,
thank you for responding. the a630 has a memory of 64mb & the cybershot has 16mb. is it better to have more memory with the 8.0/1 megapixels?
reply to this comment
thank you for responding. the a630 has a memory of 64mb & the cybershot has 16mb. is it better to have more memory with the 8.0/1 megapixels?
Brenda Paro (10/30/2006)
Hey Danielle,
The internal memory doesn't matter a whole bunch- even with 64mb of memory, an 8-megapixel camera will store less than 20 photos at the lowest resolution. Probably more like 10-15. So, with either camera you'll want to buy memory cards. I think of internal memory as more of an emergency situation fallback than as an actual method of storage. Also, with some cameras using the internal memory means that you lose the photos if your batteries die. So I wouldn't let built-in memory be too much of a factor.
reply to this comment
The internal memory doesn't matter a whole bunch- even with 64mb of memory, an 8-megapixel camera will store less than 20 photos at the lowest resolution. Probably more like 10-15. So, with either camera you'll want to buy memory cards. I think of internal memory as more of an emergency situation fallback than as an actual method of storage. Also, with some cameras using the internal memory means that you lose the photos if your batteries die. So I wouldn't let built-in memory be too much of a factor.
danielle (10/31/2006)
hi brenda,
thanks for the info. the canon a630 has a swing out lcd & i read that's a good thing to have especially for aerial shots. how duarable are these movabe lcd's?
reply to this comment
thanks for the info. the canon a630 has a swing out lcd & i read that's a good thing to have especially for aerial shots. how duarable are these movabe lcd's?
Brenda Paro (11/01/2006)
Because of its size and because it does fold out, it is somewhat fragile. The good news is that I haven't heard ten million complaints about it breaking like I have for LCDs from other types of cameras. So, I would exercise caution with it, but as far as I know it's not the type of thing that is just going to shatter in your pocket as long as you're gentle.
reply to this comment
danielle (11/02/2006)
hi brenda,
i've decided to get the canon a630. i sampled it @ the store & loved it. thanks for your help.
reply to this comment
i've decided to get the canon a630. i sampled it @ the store & loved it. thanks for your help.
Brenda Paro (11/02/2006)
Hey Danielle,
That's great- I love the Canons. I hope you enjoy it!
reply to this comment
That's great- I love the Canons. I hope you enjoy it!
Best all-round compact digital camera (amykuegler — 10/26/2006)
I am looking to buy a new digital camera. I have been using a Sony W1 which I like except it is very hard to get clear shots with on a slow exposure (in a dark room).
Ideally the camera would have movie capability, manual exposure capability, decent optical zoom and be very compact.
I am unsure whether or not to stay with Sony or to look at Canon or something else.
Help!
reply to this comment
Ideally the camera would have movie capability, manual exposure capability, decent optical zoom and be very compact.
I am unsure whether or not to stay with Sony or to look at Canon or something else.
Help!
Joe (10/27/2006)
Since you are familiar with, and enjoy Sony I would suggest you stick with them, plus you probably have memory sticks already. The Sony w100 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is one of my favorite camera on the market right now. It is small with great features. Everything you are looking for like low light capabilities with an ISO raning up to 1000. But you lack the manual exposeure capabilities that you want so I will suggest another great camera.
The Canpn SD 800 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is another wonderful choice. It has even bettter low light options and all the other movie features you are looking for. A great deal. Excellent image stablization.
So if the manual exposure is very important to you then I would make the switch to Canon.
reply to this comment
The Canpn SD 800 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is another wonderful choice. It has even bettter low light options and all the other movie features you are looking for. A great deal. Excellent image stablization.
So if the manual exposure is very important to you then I would make the switch to Canon.
I am photographing tattoos and need a camera that will take very clear, upclose work with no glare. (Tina — 10/25/2006)
I am photographing tattoos and need a camera that will take upclose, clear photos with no glare. Is this one the best for that?
reply to this comment
Joe (10/25/2006)
The Sony W100 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is a great option because of its great macro settings. Glare won't be a problem if there is enough light so the flash doesn't have to go off. This come takes great resolution and color, and image stablization to prevent blur when taking a close up shot. And you can print massive photos with a printer and this camera as well, a wise choice.
reply to this comment
does this camera have a view finder as well as the 2.5" LCD screen? (Brian Richards — 10/24/2006)
reply to this comment
Joe (10/24/2006)
Sadly the Sony W100 only has an LCD screen. It seems Sony has removed an optical viewfinder from most of their new models in order to achieve a sleeker, small machine.
reply to this comment
Daveyboy (11/11/2006)
I believe the Sony DSC-W100 does have a viewfinder. Specs from Sony's website.
reply to this comment
Ben Keough (12/07/2006)
Yes, the W100 does have a small optical viewfinder.
reply to this comment
Looking for serious upgrade replacing Sony DSC=P10 Cybershot.... (quiet jake — 10/20/2006)
I've been entirely happy with the Sony....now 5 years old and discontinued, it's growing a bit sluggish. Thought I'd lost it and nearly settled on Canon S3, but it's way big for my use.
MUST have zoom, video, very compact. Prefer recharge over batteries.
reply to this comment
MUST have zoom, video, very compact. Prefer recharge over batteries.
Andrew Skinner (10/26/2006)
If you like the functionality and options of the Canon S3 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ), you might try the Canon A640 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). It is a 10 megapixel point and shoot that can really get the job done. If you're more comfortable sticking with Sony, the 8.1 megapixel Sony W100 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) point and shoot might work for you. You might want to go to a retailer and see how it feels in your hands before you purchase a camera though.
Andrew
reply to this comment
Andrew
quiet jake (11/02/2006)
Thanks for the tips Andew....it seems like Canon has ALWAYS got a few more tricks than the competition....
The A640 looks good, sounds good, I'd like IS too.....and I'm going to have to find a dealer to handle one of these things.
And I'd prefer a rechargeable rather than AAA batteries.
reply to this comment
The A640 looks good, sounds good, I'd like IS too.....and I'm going to have to find a dealer to handle one of these things.
And I'd prefer a rechargeable rather than AAA batteries.
Do you feel the Sony W100 is worth the price? (anonymous — 10/19/2006)
In looking at a lot of cameras you can spend a little, a lot or a fortune. It seems to me that the W100 at approx $350.00 is in the middle range in terms of expense. I am wondering what expert or others thoughts are on this prior to making my purchase.
reply to this comment
Joe (10/20/2006)
I feel the Sony W100 is a great camera but it is on the pricy end of the cameras in its feature range. Something like the Canon Powershot a620 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) has similar features and power and is nearly $100 cheaper. This is when you have to compare the smaller features to see if the price difference is worth it. Like 4 AA batts in the Canon vs. the lithium ion batt of the Sony. You get an extra megapixel with the Sony. But you lose 1x optical zoom. The Sony is sleeker and smaller. Small details. Is it worth it for you?
reply to this comment
I am looking for a digital camera with more a the speed of a regular camera -- pls help.. (Carole — 10/18/2006)
I was directed by the kits camera's to the Sony w100.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (10/24/2006)
The DSC-W100 does come with a "Burst Mode" of 4 shots at 1.0 fps (8MP JPEG fine), 100 Shot VGA at 1.3 fps (JPEG std.), and "Multi-Burst" mode.
Multi burst shots capture a rapid 16-frame burst of images, at rates of 7.5, 15, or 30 frames per second. These are played back as a slow-motion animation on the camera, but appear as a single large file with 16 sub-images in it when viewed on a computer.
It says this is a great way to analyze golf swings, etc. But as a single file, I'm not sure they are easily editable.
Burst mode is also available, and captures images for as long as the Shutter button is held down. Frame rates and the maximum number of images depends on the image quality and resolution settings, as well as the amount of available memory space.
So, you have the ability to shoot rapidly with this camera, but I'm not sure it will duplicate the experience of an SLR with a motor drive.
reply to this comment
Multi burst shots capture a rapid 16-frame burst of images, at rates of 7.5, 15, or 30 frames per second. These are played back as a slow-motion animation on the camera, but appear as a single large file with 16 sub-images in it when viewed on a computer.
It says this is a great way to analyze golf swings, etc. But as a single file, I'm not sure they are easily editable.
Burst mode is also available, and captures images for as long as the Shutter button is held down. Frame rates and the maximum number of images depends on the image quality and resolution settings, as well as the amount of available memory space.
So, you have the ability to shoot rapidly with this camera, but I'm not sure it will duplicate the experience of an SLR with a motor drive.
i enjoy take pic of my kidz (maria — 10/10/2006)
what kind of digital camera should i look for? i learn that canon is the best brand. but with kind i am looking for?
reply to this comment
Joe (10/11/2006)
I think that the Sony W100 is a fine camera but if you would like a Canon, which is an excellent brand as well, I would recommend the Canon a640 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) if you want a powerful camera that take large high resolution stills, but maintains an ease of use.
The Canon SD 800 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) if you want more of a compact camera. This version also has Image Stablization which helps when taking those often quick and shaky pics of the kids (or kidz). This is a nice small pocketsized camera.
The Canon a540 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is a great camera that doesn't have the power of the other two but is great for the average user. It is also considerably cheaper but still good quality.
You are probably wondering, which one is the best? The truth is they are all great cameras that will take wonderful pictures of you kids. It basically comes down to what features you like and how much you are willing to spend. You will not be disappointed with any of these three cameras. If you are very undecided I would suggest going to your local Best Buy or any tech store and trying a few of these cameras out then purchasing the one you like online so you get the good price deals.
Good Luck
reply to this comment
The Canon SD 800 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) if you want more of a compact camera. This version also has Image Stablization which helps when taking those often quick and shaky pics of the kids (or kidz). This is a nice small pocketsized camera.
The Canon a540 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is a great camera that doesn't have the power of the other two but is great for the average user. It is also considerably cheaper but still good quality.
You are probably wondering, which one is the best? The truth is they are all great cameras that will take wonderful pictures of you kids. It basically comes down to what features you like and how much you are willing to spend. You will not be disappointed with any of these three cameras. If you are very undecided I would suggest going to your local Best Buy or any tech store and trying a few of these cameras out then purchasing the one you like online so you get the good price deals.
Good Luck
What is a good high performance camera for a budget of about $300.00? (Randi — 10/10/2006)
reply to this comment
Joe (10/11/2006)
I recommend the Sony W100 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) a lot because it is a personal favorite of mine and I think it is a quality product but there are some down sides, it takes only Memory Sticks like all Sony cameras, and it has a fairly weak zoom range (3x optical). Because of this i will recommend two other cameras in your price range.
The Canon a640 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is a bit over $300 but it really packs a punch with 10 megapixles and ease of use, it is a favorite of many users. Again weak zoom though :(
The Olympus sp510 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) has both a powerful zoom and 7 megapixels.
Check each one out and see which is the best for you. These are all quality cameras though I have never used an Olympus myself so you might want to check out the reviews for that camera.
reply to this comment
The Canon a640 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is a bit over $300 but it really packs a punch with 10 megapixles and ease of use, it is a favorite of many users. Again weak zoom though :(
The Olympus sp510 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) has both a powerful zoom and 7 megapixels.
Check each one out and see which is the best for you. These are all quality cameras though I have never used an Olympus myself so you might want to check out the reviews for that camera.
what will be digital cam to take everyday pic of my kidz with best qual of pic (maria — 10/10/2006)
reply to this comment
Joe (10/10/2006)
You are going to want a versatile camera with the ability to take pictures quickly and have high quality. I would recommend the Sony W100 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). It is fast and has very high quality pictures. It comes highly reviewed as well. This is an easy to use camera that has a lot of horse power. I also recommended this one because I know when you have kids you have lots to carry and this doesn't tkae up much space, fits well in a pocket or pocketbook.
reply to this comment
fast shutter speed multiple shots? (Bob McKown — 10/10/2006)
I raise and compete with German shepherds in Schutzhund(tracking,obedience,protection) and need a camera that will take rapid action photos but is fairly easy to use in digital and ease of down loading to my computer would also be nice. and lots of memory is a big plus.
reply to this comment
Brenda Paro (11/08/2006)
Hi, I noticed that your question hasn't been responded to yet. Are you still looking for an answer? If so, I recommend you re-submit it on www.DigitalCamera-HQ.com, so it will have a better chance of being noticed. These days it looks like most questions are being answered within a few days. Good luck!
reply to this comment
I like taking close up picture of my children...Is this Sony W100 great for that? and also, whats the difference between the scan disk and the memory stick pro duo?...Thanks, Elissa (Elissa — 10/10/2006)
Is it good for close ups?
What the difference between scan disk and memory stick duo?
reply to this comment
What the difference between scan disk and memory stick duo?
Joe (10/10/2006)
Yes the Sony W100 is great for taking close up pictures it has 3x zoom which isn't very high but good enough for close ups in the house and yard.
A scan disk is just another type of memory card that stores pictures but it will not work with a Sony camera. You have to get a Memory Stick, any form. A memory Stick pro duo is just a fast, higher capacity card that go up to 4 gigabytes (aka tons and tons of pictures). Memory Sticks or an brand are the only memory cards that Sony cameras take.
Good Luck
reply to this comment
A scan disk is just another type of memory card that stores pictures but it will not work with a Sony camera. You have to get a Memory Stick, any form. A memory Stick pro duo is just a fast, higher capacity card that go up to 4 gigabytes (aka tons and tons of pictures). Memory Sticks or an brand are the only memory cards that Sony cameras take.
Good Luck
Elissa (10/10/2006)
Hello again :) ... I do have more ?'s that I forgot to mention...
1. Does it have a date stamp (that shows on pics)?
2. How is the movie mode?
3. Will I be able to save or put movie on a dvd disk from camera to computer?
4. Can I zoom in on getting close up shots that will come out clear?
5. Will my close up shots come out blurry? (this ? goes with #4)
Also, I forgot to mention I already purchased the sony w100....But could return if I needed to, that's if this camera is not what I thought it would be...I paid $345.00....and don't mind investing in a good digital camera...I do have two little ones and I feel taking good quality crystal clear shots and close up shots are so, so worth it!!...I hope you can help me or any of you experts! :) :) Please.......Look forward to hearing from you...Thanks
reply to this comment
1. Does it have a date stamp (that shows on pics)?
2. How is the movie mode?
3. Will I be able to save or put movie on a dvd disk from camera to computer?
4. Can I zoom in on getting close up shots that will come out clear?
5. Will my close up shots come out blurry? (this ? goes with #4)
Also, I forgot to mention I already purchased the sony w100....But could return if I needed to, that's if this camera is not what I thought it would be...I paid $345.00....and don't mind investing in a good digital camera...I do have two little ones and I feel taking good quality crystal clear shots and close up shots are so, so worth it!!...I hope you can help me or any of you experts! :) :) Please.......Look forward to hearing from you...Thanks
Ben Keough (12/03/2006)
Hi, I noticed that you haven't marked any replies as the "best answer." Are you still looking for an answer? If so, I recommend you re-submit it on digitalcamera-hq.com so it will have a better chance of being noticed. These days it looks like most questions are being answered within a few days. Good luck!
reply to this comment
I'm looking for a great FAST compact digital camera? Is this the one? (Lou — 10/07/2006)
Which recycles faster shot to shot & gives better resolution in prints -- the W100 or Canon 800 IS ? Is is a problem that the W100 is lacking image stabilization? HOw is the LCD in sunlight?
reply to this comment
Brenda Paro (11/06/2006)
Hi, I noticed that your question hasn't been responded to yet. Are you still looking for an answer? If so, I recommend you re-submit it on www.DigitalCamera-HQ.com, so it will have a better chance of being noticed. These days it looks like most questions are being answered within a few days. Good luck!
reply to this comment
I want to take pictures of events (Jeanette — 10/04/2006)
I want to take pictures of an event on stage in a darkend room like a school play.
reply to this comment
Joe (10/08/2006)
We get this question a lot and I really woudl have to recommend two possible options. The Sony W100 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is a great camera that takes quick pictures and can even be set to Burst Mode which takes 5 stills in a row to capture all the action, it is great for those homerun swings and touchdown dives. The one considerable set back to this great camera is the lack of zoom capability (3x optical). That can be a problem getting great close pictures from the stands of sporting events.
So the other camera I would recommend is the Canon S2 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). It is also a great powerful camera with an amazing optical zoom of 12x. So you know optical zoom is a 'real' zoom that keeps the picture quality high where as digital zoom is an artifical zoom that distorts and pixelates your stills (BOOOO we don't want a pixelated child now do we?). This camera also has Image Stablization which helps keep the pictures blur free even with shaky hands. This is very important when zoom in to the max (12x). Your fame gets pretty shaky at the length so this helps a great deal. The one down side being that the Canon is bulky compared to the Sony.
So you have to weigh the options. Good luck.
reply to this comment
So the other camera I would recommend is the Canon S2 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). It is also a great powerful camera with an amazing optical zoom of 12x. So you know optical zoom is a 'real' zoom that keeps the picture quality high where as digital zoom is an artifical zoom that distorts and pixelates your stills (BOOOO we don't want a pixelated child now do we?). This camera also has Image Stablization which helps keep the pictures blur free even with shaky hands. This is very important when zoom in to the max (12x). Your fame gets pretty shaky at the length so this helps a great deal. The one down side being that the Canon is bulky compared to the Sony.
So you have to weigh the options. Good luck.
Jeanette (10/08/2006)
Thank you for the answer to my question. I went to a store just this weekend and could get no help there. I hope to look at those cameras in the store.
reply to this comment
WHAT CAMERA IS BEST FOR TAKING ACTION/SPORTS PICTURE. (JAMIE — 10/04/2006)
I WOULD LIKE A CAMERA THAT I CAN TAKE PICTURES OF MY KIDS FOOTBALL & SOFTBALL GAMES.
reply to this comment
Joe (10/08/2006)
We get this question a lot and I really woudl have to recommend two possible options. The Sony W100 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is a great camera that takes quick pictures and can even be set to Burst Mode which takes 5 stills in a row to capture all the action, it is great for those homerun swings and touchdown dives. The one considerable set back to this great camera is the lack of zoom capability (3x optical). That can be a problem getting great close pictures from the stands of sporting events.
So the other camera I would recommend is the Canon S2 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). It is also a great powerful camera with an amazing optical zoom of 12x. So you know optical zoom is a 'real' zoom that keeps the picture quality high where as digital zoom is an artifical zoom that distorts and pixelates your stills (BOOOO we don't want a pixelated child now do we?). This camera also has Image Stablization which helps keep the pictures blur free even with shaky hands. This is very important when zoom in to the max (12x). Your fame gets pretty shaky at the length so this helps a great deal. The one down side being that the Canon is bulky compared to the Sony.
So you have to weigh the options. Good luck.
reply to this comment
So the other camera I would recommend is the Canon S2 IS ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). It is also a great powerful camera with an amazing optical zoom of 12x. So you know optical zoom is a 'real' zoom that keeps the picture quality high where as digital zoom is an artifical zoom that distorts and pixelates your stills (BOOOO we don't want a pixelated child now do we?). This camera also has Image Stablization which helps keep the pictures blur free even with shaky hands. This is very important when zoom in to the max (12x). Your fame gets pretty shaky at the length so this helps a great deal. The one down side being that the Canon is bulky compared to the Sony.
So you have to weigh the options. Good luck.
Debbie (01/01/2007)
I got the Kodak Easy Share C875 for Christmas, will this be capable to take good pictures at sporting events? Seems like it has a slow shutter speed to be able to capture a series of pictures at a event and am wondering at the football games how it will do at night and with the 5x zoom is that enough from the stands. Would I have good picture quality or blurred.
Thanks
reply to this comment
Thanks
lusupershots (06/05/2009)
I take softball and football shots and need a camera with a good stabilizer and a long burst
reply to this comment
which is better among Sony & Canon? (ankur — 10/04/2006)
i want to purchase 8 mega pixel camera for personal use.
reply to this comment
camera? (10/04/2006)
Your best options would be the Canon A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) or the Sony W100 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... )
The W100 has a lot of very positive user reviews, more than the relatively new A630, but Canon is known for reputable cameras, and the A630 should be just as fantastic as the preceding A620/A610 models.
reply to this comment
The W100 has a lot of very positive user reviews, more than the relatively new A630, but Canon is known for reputable cameras, and the A630 should be just as fantastic as the preceding A620/A610 models.
how many picture (post card size) can be shot (anonymous — 10/04/2006)
reply to this comment
anonymous (10/04/2006)
mbmngg3@rediffmail.com
reply to this comment
tharrison (10/04/2006)
Hi --
The number of pictures depends on three things:
1) size of the "memory stick" this camera uses to hold pictures, and
2) the "size" setting on the camera (number of megapixels, or M for this camera), and
3) the image quality setting, either "fine" or "std".
A post-card size image is about 4x6, so according to the manual for the Sony W100 ( esupport.sony.com/US/perl/m... ) on page 25, if you have size set to 2M, and image quality set to Fine, you can get 133 pictures on a 128MB memory stick. Each time you double the size of the memory stick, you can double this number.
But...
Memory cards are relatively inexpensive, and what we usually recommend is that you set the camera at its full resolution (8M) which lets you decide how to use the picture later. It's also true that it's kind of a waste to use all those megapixels if you're never going to do more than small prints, though, so the choice is yours.
reply to this comment
The number of pictures depends on three things:
1) size of the "memory stick" this camera uses to hold pictures, and
2) the "size" setting on the camera (number of megapixels, or M for this camera), and
3) the image quality setting, either "fine" or "std".
A post-card size image is about 4x6, so according to the manual for the Sony W100 ( esupport.sony.com/US/perl/m... ) on page 25, if you have size set to 2M, and image quality set to Fine, you can get 133 pictures on a 128MB memory stick. Each time you double the size of the memory stick, you can double this number.
But...
Memory cards are relatively inexpensive, and what we usually recommend is that you set the camera at its full resolution (8M) which lets you decide how to use the picture later. It's also true that it's kind of a waste to use all those megapixels if you're never going to do more than small prints, though, so the choice is yours.
able to capture sports in action (Rocky — 10/03/2006)
I want to puchase a camera that enables me to take shots quickly during softball and football games
reply to this comment
Joe (10/06/2006)
The Canon Powershot A630 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is a good choice because of its iSAPS (Intelligent Scene Analysis based on Photographic Space) automatically optimises camera settings before your shot. Basically it does the labor for you given a certain environment.
Also the Sony W100 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is great because of its Burst Shot Mode that take 5 shots in a row at a high rate to ensure you capture that homerun smack.
reply to this comment
Also the Sony W100 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is great because of its Burst Shot Mode that take 5 shots in a row at a high rate to ensure you capture that homerun smack.
I want to take a picture at my son's basketball game inside the gym (Stephanie — 10/01/2006)
I want a camara that can take pictures inside the school gyms
reply to this comment
Joe (10/04/2006)
Most all new cameras are up to this duty, but I am assuming you want a camera that can capture the action. So I would have to recommend either the Sony W100 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) because of its burst shot feature (meaning it takes a series of shots quickly in a row to capture action) and its great flash.
Or the Panasonic Lumix DMC LZ3 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). Check out the reviews on each and see which best fits your budget and feature desires.
reply to this comment
Or the Panasonic Lumix DMC LZ3 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). Check out the reviews on each and see which best fits your budget and feature desires.
Joe (11/28/2006)
Hi, I noticed that you havent marked any replies as the best answer. Are you still looking for an answer? If so, I recommend you re-submit it on Digitalcamera-hq.com so it will have a better chance of being noticed. These days it looks like most questions are being answered within a few days. Good luck.
reply to this comment
Which digital camera is best for hi speed vehicle shooting.. within reason $$ wise (Brent Spencer — 10/01/2006)
Met a guy at the NHRA this year and he could capture the tires wrinkling on TOP FUEL cars with his Minolta digital camera? Maybe it was a canon, not sure, but I think it was a Minolta. Which camera would be best suited for filming high speed vehicles to get crisp clear zoom in blow up shots for photo's etc? Thank you Brent Spencer www.2koolperformance.com
sales@2koolperformance.com
reply to this comment
sales@2koolperformance.com
Joe (10/04/2006)
I would suggest getting the Sony W100 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) it is a resonable price, it takes great colorful photos and it has a high ISO range 80-800 and burst shoot mode which takes a series of shoot very quickly one right after the other. Great value, solid camera. And it is black which just looks awesome!
Reply if you are looking for an SLR style camera.
reply to this comment
Reply if you are looking for an SLR style camera.
Brent Spencer (10/04/2006)
so do you think this would be ok for capturing high speed vehicle runs in clear frame per frame quality ? The Minolta's I know are now unavialble as I heard they were out of business. Might have been the 5D or 7D version Minolta that my buddy was using at the NHRA with a big kick arse lens on it... I think the lens was self adjusting also... it was a WICKED set up. he could just grab the camera and swing it with his finger on the button and ever single pic was captured crystal clear with no distortion whatsoever.. it was BIZARRE
spenc
www.2koolperformance.com
reply to this comment
spenc
www.2koolperformance.com
Joe (10/04/2006)
ok you are not looking for the Sony W100 then. That sounds like a very professional set up with an incredible high ISO and shutter speed to ensure that split second would be captured and the rig was used to keep the camera very still to improve clarity.
The
Canon EOS 30D ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is a top of the line pro SLR camera that would be good for this sort of thing. But I can't recommend a specific lens to get, sorry. You should ask your buddy more details then maybe we can guide you to a good deal.
thanks
reply to this comment
The
Canon EOS 30D ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) is a top of the line pro SLR camera that would be good for this sort of thing. But I can't recommend a specific lens to get, sorry. You should ask your buddy more details then maybe we can guide you to a good deal.
thanks
Brent Spencer (10/04/2006)
gotcha... even if we could get a good camera that we could use on a tri-pod. we'd be pretty close to the action.
reply to this comment
dollar (01/30/2007)
I used a samsung last year day shots where awesome night shots would be blurry
reply to this comment
Ola!which would any of you guys choose between olympus 720SW and Sony DSC W100, or DSC N1? (sheki — 09/30/2006)
I am really confused as i am about to get my self one of these toys. Olympus seduces me with its size and weather proof features.Any help would be apreciated.
reply to this comment
Joe (10/03/2006)
The Olympus 720sw does have some cool features but it isnot very highly reviewed. The Sony DSC N1 is a cool "party" type camera meaning it is sleek and have some fancy features but it isnt a work horse like other models. I would suggest the Sony DSC W100 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) because it is a well rounded camera that takes great quality photos and it is very small too.
reply to this comment
sheki (10/03/2006)
thnx buddy
reply to this comment
Inge (12/29/2006)
please give me some some good tips using the Sony 8.1 pix DSCW 100. Do's and don'ts, anything. Thanks
reply to this comment
How fast does this camera come back in between shots? (Nanc-C — 09/29/2006)
I do animal photography & was considering the W-100 to carry around for those quick shots you can't get with a large camera but this camera seems to have some extra, very intriguing features over the W-100, although the W-100 seems to have a quick recoup time in between shots even with the flash on.
reply to this comment
Joe (10/03/2006)
I would go with the Sony w-100 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). It has all the features you are looking for plus it has burst shot if you really need to get a a quick 5 shots in a row for when that animal does a back flip or whatever. And the ISO goes up to 1000 which is great if you have a lot of light.
The DSC-N1 has a bunch of cool features to but the w-100 is higher quality overall in my opinion.
good luck
Ciao
reply to this comment
The DSC-N1 has a bunch of cool features to but the w-100 is higher quality overall in my opinion.
good luck
Ciao
best for macro (Max — 09/29/2006)
I need a new camera, preferable a Sony for compatability that is good for Macro. Compact not SLR. All current models have more than enough resolution.
reply to this comment
Joe (10/03/2006)
If Sony is your brand then I would have to recommend the W100 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). It is just overall a great camera plus it is great for close in shots. If you are shooting under studio lights it could be a problem because the W100 doesn't have manual white balance.
But for all other situations where natural light or incandecent light is being used it is perfect. The zoom function also helps here to make sure you are far enough away from the subject as to not cast a shadow. Also with a long lens you get a shorter depth of field meaning subject in focus and shape where background is blurry. This really helps the subject pop out of the frame although it is difficult to achieve on most digital cameras.
Good luck
Ciao!
reply to this comment
But for all other situations where natural light or incandecent light is being used it is perfect. The zoom function also helps here to make sure you are far enough away from the subject as to not cast a shadow. Also with a long lens you get a shorter depth of field meaning subject in focus and shape where background is blurry. This really helps the subject pop out of the frame although it is difficult to achieve on most digital cameras.
Good luck
Ciao!
Max (10/05/2006)
Thank you Joe for taking the time to answer. I will take a look at this camera at our local store.
Max
reply to this comment
Max
what reasonably priced models are easy to use and easy to get the pix from camera to computer - eg, using USB memory sticks instead of memory cards? I am new to digital camera world. (Bev — 09/29/2006)
Easy to use, USB transfer vs memory card, decent quality
reply to this comment
Joe (10/03/2006)
OK wellmost all digital cameras are USB transfer so you don't have to worry about that. Memory sticks are a form of memory cards that are used by Sony. Either way you hook your camera up to your computer with a USB cable and the camera acts as the reader (transfering your stills). If you are saying that you already have some memory sticks and want to get a camera to use them on then I would recommend The Sony Cybershot W100 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ). It is a great point and shot camera that gives you excellent pictures without needing tons of camera knowledge.
If this is not want you mean please send a responce with further information, thanks.
Ciao!
reply to this comment
If this is not want you mean please send a responce with further information, thanks.
Ciao!
Sony CyberShot W100 Reviews
Sony CyberShot W100 Reviews by Digital Camera-HQ Users
- 1.0 out of 5
Poor Sony Support
(Tom Dev — 04/09/2009)
I bought the W100 in 2007. It lasted one month before the screen broke. Sony refused to honor the warranty and repair then was $180. The repair company lost the camera and after 6 months of haggle and BBB, I got my money back and bought a beautiful point and shoot Canon. I recommend Camera. No more Sony anything for me.
- 5.0 out of 5
it is a surviver
(Abdirashid — 02/01/2008)
it a very user friendly camera had for about 1 year and very hard for the kids to break it
- 2.0 out of 5
good pictures temporarily
(donald dornisch — 09/22/2007)
Worked fine for about 1 year...maybe 200 pics. Big screen on back went bad and Sony wants $191 to fix it. Think about Sony "quality"
- 1.0 out of 5
Wow, really expected more
(bj — 09/12/2007)
Bought this camera for a pocket point and shoot. Pictures were fantastic, but after 20 pictures it would no longer work. Gave an error to turn the camera off and turn it back on. Googled the problem and found that the lense constantly has problems. Returned to the store and while in line returning mine the lady in front of me was returning the same camera with a screen problem. She had also owned the camera for less than a week. Really disappointed with this camera.
- 5.0 out of 5
Precious One!
(Alex — 05/04/2007)
No questions about image quality.....which I appreciated much.Another feature which triggers my total satisfaction is,a user-friendly camera.Its designers are great! Probably, they anticipated the many ill-feelings of beginners on "very high-tech"ones.
- 4.0 out of 5
Great for anything but closeups
(Tom Wrigh — 02/10/2007)
I never owned a digital camera before. This one has a great feel, and for anything other than extreme close-ups, it's perfect. I specifically bought it (salesman told me it was the one for closeups!) for taking pictures of specimens at extreme closeup range, and you can't get close enough to take really clear pictures at close range, and the macro depth of field makes the picture come out VERY flat. For anything else though, I actually love the quality feel of this little workhorse.
- 4.0 out of 5
Sony DSC-W100 Review
(Lisa — 02/08/2007)
This is my first digital camera that I bought, and in the overall cost, this is a camera worth its price. The only thing i dislike about this camera, is that I can't take rapid shots. But overall, its a great camera with great features. The battery life is long and its easy to function. Quality is great.
- 5.0 out of 5
Smooth Digital
(Steven — 02/06/2007)
I highly recommend this camera to anyone who is in the market for one. You will not be disappointed.
- 5.0 out of 5
One of the BEST
(jaya kumar — 01/20/2007)
This is my first digital camera. I really love it.
Well designed;Easy to operate;Great picture clarity;Easy transfers to your PC; all this for a low price.I think this one lives up to its reputation.
- 5.0 out of 5
best camera I own
(claire — 01/16/2007)
This camera beats my best. it can do way more than I thought it could. It really surprised me!
- 5.0 out of 5
Sony DSC W100
(Ed A. — 10/15/2006)
I love this camera! It has a great battery life. Its compact and small enough to carry in your pocket. I got a great price for it shopping online, new also! I was thinking about getting the T-Series Sony has(T-10), but they were too pricey and I think too small for my hands. This camera is the perfect size! It has a 64MB internal card (I suggest getting at least a 512MB duo card). I like the exterior looks and feel of the camera. Great quality pictures at 8.1 MB. All in all, a recommended camera! A+
- 5.0 out of 5
Great camera!
(anonymous — 07/18/2006)
I'm absolutely amazed by the color accuracy and ease of use in this little camera. I have several "Professional" digitals and this little thing rivals them in quality. Great camera, excellent price.
- 4.0 out of 5
quality flash and optical zoom
(anonymous — 07/18/2006)
sharp pictures
optical and digital zoom
quality picturs
small or average in size
beautiful view
external rechargeable two batteries
with multi charger including cmaera chager
brand sony
fit to the green atmosphere
auto and manual focus
stand by shot
movie clip minimum 2 hrs
2.5 or 3 in LCD screen
with stand
with small or average studio falsh
with 2 GB memory card
512 MB hard storeage on it.
10 mega pixel lence minimum
- 5.0 out of 5
Solid Camera
(anonymous — 07/18/2006)
This is my second Sony I have a H1 that I love. The W100 is a solid camera that can be put right in your pocket. I use it for crime scenes along with my Canon 20D and can take it to my sons baseball game. The Sony is an excellent point n shoot camera with a very long battery life. The ISO is excellent for low light shooting. My only complaint is the battery door which is a poor design. I hope Sony also comes up with cool accessories.
- 5.0 out of 5
good quality at low price
(anonymous — 07/18/2006)
excellent
- 4.0 out of 5
good
(anonymous — 07/18/2006)
its good
