Sony Cybershot W35
Sony Cybershot W35
Hey! You should know that this product has been discontinued. Here are our current recommended cameras in the Point and Shoot Digital Cameras category.
Sony Cybershot W35
Editor's Review
The Sony Cybershot W35 is similar in nearly every way to the W55, except for the slightly smaller LCD screen and lack of variety in color. This camera comes only in silver, but otherwise it's identical; good, user-friendly interface (with on-screen assistance), long-battery life, and an impressive 7 megapixel CCD.
Editor's Review
The Sony Cybershot W35 is similar in nearly every way to the W55, except for the slightly smaller LCD screen and lack of variety in color. This camera comes only in silver, but otherwise it's identical; good, user-friendly interface (with on-screen assistance), long-battery life, and an impressive 7 megapixel CCD.
Specifications
- 7.2 megapixels
- ISO 100-1000
- 3x optical zoom
- Autofocus
- Movie mode with sound
- Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo memory (56MB internal)
- JPEG file format
- 2.0-inch LCD
- Lithium-ion battery
- Release Date: Apr 01, 2007
Shop for W35 Accessories
Sony Cybershot W35 Comments & Questions (write your own!)
Display of Date & time not available (Khan — 04/03/2011)
Hi,
I want to ask is there any setting in sony W-35 for the date & time that it can be dispalyed as like other cameras have it @ the right corner below in photos. At computer while i can see the date & time but i want with each photo mentioned on it. & the result of my camera W-35 is getting bad. Before it was very good but now its not good as it was before. So is there any way to get good result from it...
reply to this comment
I want to ask is there any setting in sony W-35 for the date & time that it can be dispalyed as like other cameras have it @ the right corner below in photos. At computer while i can see the date & time but i want with each photo mentioned on it. & the result of my camera W-35 is getting bad. Before it was very good but now its not good as it was before. So is there any way to get good result from it...
by James DeRuvo (04/15/2011)
If the W35 and your printer are PICTBRIDGE compatible, you can have the printer add the date. It reads it from the image file's EXIF data and then inserts it as it prints. So that's an option.
reply to this comment
Cost of xtra memory (Nish29 — 02/25/2008)
Hi
What will be the cost in dollar of extra 2G memory for the W35 camera??
reply to this comment
What will be the cost in dollar of extra 2G memory for the W35 camera??
Andrew Skinner (02/26/2008)
reply to this comment
Nish29 (03/14/2008)
thanks for your response,just one more thing if possible.Is it same for the W55 camera also??
reply to this comment
Andrew Skinner (03/14/2008)
Nisha,
The Sony W55 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) does use the same memory as this camera.
Andrew
reply to this comment
The Sony W55 ( digitalcamera-hq.com/digita... ) does use the same memory as this camera.
Andrew
For the Sony W53, how many pictures can you take before the battery dies? (cw — 09/22/2007)
reply to this comment
Ritu Chandna (09/24/2007)
i guess, its 380 shots, if ur battery was fully charged when u started
reply to this comment
Cathy A. (01/17/2008)
I got mine for Christmas - The battery was not charged - just what came out of the package was on it for a charge. When I downloaded the pictures I had 437 of them! Not a complaint here!!!
reply to this comment
How to take good quality pictures of Moving Objects with the W35? (matrix — 07/26/2007)
Which mode should I use , which megapixel setting should I use, and how should i use the zoom (while using W35)if I need to take clear images of moving objects .
reply to this comment
Ben Keough (07/26/2007)
Hi Sam,
First of all, megapixels don't matter when it comes to picture clarity. Use whatever you like.
Stay in auto mode or sports mode (if the W35 has one).
Unfortunately the W35 doesn't let you manually set the shutter speed, which would be most useful here. One thing you can do is select a higher ISO setting, which will allow the auto mode to choose a higher shutter speed. Re: zoom... I'd recommend staying zoomed out for the best response. The closer you zoom in the smaller the aperture is and the longer the shutter speed will be.
Hope this helps!
reply to this comment
First of all, megapixels don't matter when it comes to picture clarity. Use whatever you like.
Stay in auto mode or sports mode (if the W35 has one).
Unfortunately the W35 doesn't let you manually set the shutter speed, which would be most useful here. One thing you can do is select a higher ISO setting, which will allow the auto mode to choose a higher shutter speed. Re: zoom... I'd recommend staying zoomed out for the best response. The closer you zoom in the smaller the aperture is and the longer the shutter speed will be.
Hope this helps!
matrix (08/04/2007)
Thanks Ben.
reply to this comment
Imran (10/23/2007)
I am planing to get Sony W35. Will Sony be the best or should i opt for other one in the same range?
reply to this comment
can we use this as webcamera? If so means,how? (sakthiero — 07/02/2007)
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (07/02/2007)
We get this question alot. Not very many digital still cameras can actually be used as a webcam. This is mostly due to the lack of drivers for it. SONY does have a tutorial for using some of their models as a webcam ( esupport.sony.com/perl/tuto... ), but my question is, with battery issues, why would you?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (07/12/2007)
Hi, I noticed that you haven't marked any replies as the "best answer." Are you still looking for an answer? If so, I recommend you re-submit it on digitalcamera-hq.com so it will have a better chance of being noticed. These days it looks like most questions are being answered within a few days. Good luck!
reply to this comment
which camara is better the w35 or the nikon coolpix l12 (buho2000 — 06/25/2007)
the most important feature for my self are, good stability device, good for night, sports and kids pictures
reply to this comment
kwalkerr (07/27/2007)
I have used both Sony W35 & Nikon L11 (similar to L12) cameras. Personally, I prefer the picture quality and ease of use of the Sony. Also the Sony w35 is great for kids as it has next to no shutter lag between shots and a relatively fast flash recycle time. The smaller physical size of the w35, its lighter weight along with robust construction are a treat. Therefore, you will find yourself taking it everywhere with you; thus capturing pictures you might otherwise miss.
reply to this comment
madavakannan (11/09/2007)
I am afraid you may not compare Nikon L12 with your Nikon L11.
12 has VR (Image Stabilsn) feature which 11 does not have. VR produces good sharp pictures and also reduces the blur shots.
Sony has no Image Stabilsn. feature in it.
Nikon always produces crisp images ahead of Sony.
reply to this comment
I am afraid you may not compare Nikon L12 with your Nikon L11.
12 has VR (Image Stabilsn) feature which 11 does not have. VR produces good sharp pictures and also reduces the blur shots.
Sony has no Image Stabilsn. feature in it.
Nikon always produces crisp images ahead of Sony.
How can I make a Date printable on the photos (HMehany — 06/14/2007)
How can I make a Date printable on the photos? I can set the date & time, but I want the Date to appear on each Photo when I take it on the computer
reply to this comment
Rich Watson (06/14/2007)
You could use an editor like Photoshop to add the date. Lots of bother; however, if you have numerous photos (say of a trip) then you could just put the dates/locations on a few of the photos, and that would peg the date for your scrapbook collection.
reply to this comment
HMehany (06/14/2007)
it can't be that this is the way to paste the dates on the photos (to wright it by photoshop), thought that the camera display is showing the date & time of each photo I believe there must be a way to paste them on the photos while transferring to the computer
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (07/06/2007)
Well, sadly, datebacks are a thing of the past, particularly with digital. And considering that only 20% of digital camera users actually print their pictures, most just rely on the stats that are in the digital file.
reply to this comment
HMehany (07/07/2007)
Dears, I'm talking about the date to appear on the photos, in the bottom right corner, not while printing as cards or something
the camera itself save the date & time of each photo, and when u make display, u can c it, but the question is how to make this appear on each photo, I cant believe that this feature is not available
reply to this comment
the camera itself save the date & time of each photo, and when u make display, u can c it, but the question is how to make this appear on each photo, I cant believe that this feature is not available
by James DeRuvo (07/07/2007)
Sorry to burst your bubble, but it's been disappearing for awhile now. A few cameras may have it. But to put it on the prints themselves just isn't popular much anymore.
reply to this comment
Rich Watson (07/08/2007)
James is right. This (embed feature) is much more prevalent on camcorders. It's either on your camera or it isn't. (There is no hack short of an editor). Have you checked terms such as "date" or "print date" in the index of your owner's manual?
And...by the way. just curious...why is it so important to have this on every photo?
reply to this comment
And...by the way. just curious...why is it so important to have this on every photo?
HMehany (07/09/2007)
Well Richio, in my work which is a construction project, we have to take photos whenever we start new activity or finishing others, so we have to put the dates in the progress photographs as a proof :(
if the camera is not providing this feature, I have to open editor to add the date myself
moreover, after a while, u will need to know what was the occasion when u took this photo, or what was the date :)
reply to this comment
if the camera is not providing this feature, I have to open editor to add the date myself
moreover, after a while, u will need to know what was the occasion when u took this photo, or what was the date :)
Rich Watson (07/09/2007)
Well...obviously, the photo editing is not the best proof, since a person could insert an incorrect date.
But the embedded file info, such as the camera brand, f-stop, shutter, AND date---I don't think those can be changed. So that data (I believe) would hence be immutable (and thus a good proof of the correct time).
reply to this comment
But the embedded file info, such as the camera brand, f-stop, shutter, AND date---I don't think those can be changed. So that data (I believe) would hence be immutable (and thus a good proof of the correct time).
HMehany (07/10/2007)
U may be Right, but in the construction projects, u give them a print out of the photos in a report, u don't give the softcopy, moreover, if u crop or rotate or autocorrect the photo & save the file, u lose the creating date and record the save date:)
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (07/10/2007)
What you may want to consider investing in is the GiSTEQ Photo Tracker Kit ( gisteq.com/index-PT.html ). Syncs with the timestamp on your camera, but also will “geotag” your pictures, then will interact with sites like Flickr, to show you exactly where you took the picture and when. Costs about $99 but you can find it lower on the net if you look hard enough.
And in your line of work, this can be invaluable in not only identifying what date it was taken, but pinpointing exactly what construction site it was taken at.
reply to this comment
And in your line of work, this can be invaluable in not only identifying what date it was taken, but pinpointing exactly what construction site it was taken at.
Rich Watson (07/10/2007)
FYI
I just tried this, so I know this is correct: In both Photoshop AND MS Explorer,
both programs show when the photo was created---which cannot be changed. BOTH programs show creation date AND modified date.
U are correct that any mods will change the "modification" date---but no mods can change the "created" date.
So the software "angle" does indeed provide proof positive, although I agree that that method is not very convenient. Perhaps you could print out a page from MS Explorer as substantiation.
reply to this comment
I just tried this, so I know this is correct: In both Photoshop AND MS Explorer,
both programs show when the photo was created---which cannot be changed. BOTH programs show creation date AND modified date.
U are correct that any mods will change the "modification" date---but no mods can change the "created" date.
So the software "angle" does indeed provide proof positive, although I agree that that method is not very convenient. Perhaps you could print out a page from MS Explorer as substantiation.
HMehany (07/11/2007)
Thank u guys so much, we were really helpful
Best Regards
reply to this comment
Best Regards
have zeroed in on two models...sony cybershot dsc w35 and canon powershot A550..so could u tell me which of the two is better.... (arvind82 — 05/13/2007)
reply to this comment
Matt (05/14/2007)
I'm guessing you're in the $150-$200 price range?
These two cameras are completely different, the Sony being ultra-compact and the Canon only being compact.
If you don't mind the larger size of the Canon model you chose, go with that one. It has the bigger lens, better flash pictures (takes awhile to charge between flashes because of only 2 batteries instead of 4 like other more-expensive, bulkier models), and nice movie mode.
If you opt for the Canon, make sure to get rechargeable batteries in the 2,500 power range.
Keep in mind the Sony camera uses the more expensive memory cards (4GB = $100 for Duo, vs. 4GB = $50 for SD). Adding this $50 on to the price of the Sony, and the fact the A550 is only $150 at amazon.com right now, makes the Canon model very attractive... if you don't mind the added bulk.
reply to this comment
These two cameras are completely different, the Sony being ultra-compact and the Canon only being compact.
If you don't mind the larger size of the Canon model you chose, go with that one. It has the bigger lens, better flash pictures (takes awhile to charge between flashes because of only 2 batteries instead of 4 like other more-expensive, bulkier models), and nice movie mode.
If you opt for the Canon, make sure to get rechargeable batteries in the 2,500 power range.
Keep in mind the Sony camera uses the more expensive memory cards (4GB = $100 for Duo, vs. 4GB = $50 for SD). Adding this $50 on to the price of the Sony, and the fact the A550 is only $150 at amazon.com right now, makes the Canon model very attractive... if you don't mind the added bulk.
is the w35 real value for money (arvind82 — 05/11/2007)
my budget is in the range of 10000-13000 rs
reply to this comment
Matt (05/11/2007)
No idea what 10000-13000 rs is... but for ~$150, this is a good camera. There aren't any manual modes, just scene presets, and you'll need to avoid most dim-lighting situations (stay below ISO200 as much as possible, and avoid ISO400 whenever you can). But at that pricepoint, you really can't ask for much more.
reply to this comment
arvind82 (05/13/2007)
thanx dude..i was referring to indian rupees(rs)...anyways i have zeroed in on two models...sony cybershot dsc w35 and canon powershot A550..so could u tell me which of the two is better....
reply to this comment
Matt (05/13/2007)
I almost always give the nod to Canon when compared to Sony. This is no exception. This website also gave the A550 one of the "best camera" awards:
steves-digicams.com/2007_re... in mind the differences between these two cameras:
1.) DSC-W35 is ultracompact, the A550 is just a compact (ie, larger)
2.) DSC-W35 has 3x zoom, A550 has 4x zoom
3.) Battery life is longer on the A550, but takes AA batteries.
4.) Image quality is better on the A550, but, again, is larger.
If you insist on needing an ultra-compact, there's no other choice than to choose the DSC-W35 for your choice. If you don't care and that's why the A550 made it onto your list, then go with the A550. You can easily get one for <$200, and the "bang-for-the-buck" is very good.
I encourage you to read the review I posted the link to above.
reply to this comment
steves-digicams.com/2007_re... in mind the differences between these two cameras:
1.) DSC-W35 is ultracompact, the A550 is just a compact (ie, larger)
2.) DSC-W35 has 3x zoom, A550 has 4x zoom
3.) Battery life is longer on the A550, but takes AA batteries.
4.) Image quality is better on the A550, but, again, is larger.
If you insist on needing an ultra-compact, there's no other choice than to choose the DSC-W35 for your choice. If you don't care and that's why the A550 made it onto your list, then go with the A550. You can easily get one for <$200, and the "bang-for-the-buck" is very good.
I encourage you to read the review I posted the link to above.
matrix (07/26/2007)
in India also the cost of W35 is reasonable and I feel at this price it really has a lot of features packed in. The best thing about w35 undoubtedly is that it is so beautifully built with all those features in a stylish slim silver box. Regarding the image quality I think it lives up to the expectations. The picture quality in all light conditions is quite sharp but some settings have to be done for that. Moreover I feel even the movie mode is quite smooth allowing free movement of the camera while in movie mode without much problem in the output.
reply to this comment
my Sony Cybershot W35 doesn't focus, the lense is always moving . What to do? (zrptmrl — 04/26/2007)
The lense doesn't focus (it keeps going in and out)) so it's not able to take any pictures. I am able to view the pics stored. Does this mean there is any electrical thing wrong?
reply to this comment
Ardi Ounapuu (04/26/2007)
Hello,
Usually cameras can not focus if the light is too low. Set the ISO setting to automatic and then try in bright light. If this does not help then the camera may be defective.
reply to this comment
Usually cameras can not focus if the light is too low. Set the ISO setting to automatic and then try in bright light. If this does not help then the camera may be defective.
matrix (07/29/2007)
This definitely sounds like a technical snag.
Just to check it once you can put the camera in the auto mode( where it says aotomatic audjusments) and try shooting a normal image in a room. If still the image is not captured, then use your gaurantee card validity and give it for servicing without any more delay.
If you are able to capture any sort of image under certain circumstances, i would still advice you to report the problem at the servicing centre.
reply to this comment
Just to check it once you can put the camera in the auto mode( where it says aotomatic audjusments) and try shooting a normal image in a room. If still the image is not captured, then use your gaurantee card validity and give it for servicing without any more delay.
If you are able to capture any sort of image under certain circumstances, i would still advice you to report the problem at the servicing centre.
My Sony Cybershot W35 just broke for no apparent reason. What can I do to get it fixed or replaced? (Glenn919 — 02/01/2007)
I just bought it in September 06 at a best buy in New Jersey. Do I have to go through the store or can I just send it to sony?
reply to this comment
Rich Watson (02/01/2007)
Most of these retail stores DON'T want to take an item back after 30 days. My experience has been, the retailers want you to send it in to the manufacturer.
Now, if you bought an extended warranty thru Best Buy, THEN you probably have to take it back to the store. Then they will take it from there. If you did purchase the extended warranty, call the store and see exactly what you should do next.
reply to this comment
Now, if you bought an extended warranty thru Best Buy, THEN you probably have to take it back to the store. Then they will take it from there. If you did purchase the extended warranty, call the store and see exactly what you should do next.
Hoot (03/11/2007)
Since the release date of the W35 is April 1, 2007. How could one buy it in Sep 2006
reply to this comment
Rich Watson (03/11/2007)
I dunno, Einstein---this is your story, not mine.
reply to this comment
Sony Cybershot W35 Reviews
Sony Cybershot W35 Reviews by Digital Camera-HQ Users
- 4.0 out of 5
Good camera
(Paresh — 11/26/2007)
Hi, I am using this camera past two weeks and I find it user friendly and handy pocket size to carry, gives good picture quality and lot's of features.
Good quality for the value.
- 3.0 out of 5
Sony is unassailable
(Saravanesh J — 11/01/2007)
One of the best Digicams in the market.
One who believes in the reputation of SONY must go ahead buying it without second thought....
- 5.0 out of 5
Excellent camera for price range 20K usd- 25k usd
(Asanga — 06/02/2007)
A Brilliant camera for the price range 20K-25K.For low end user this is an ideal camera
- 4.0 out of 5
awsum
(....poo — 05/21/2007)
great little camera.. basically unbreakable.. love it
- 5.0 out of 5
Best camera ever used.
(Sharath — 03/23/2007)
Hi this is sharath from India.
I have been using cybershot w35 for more than a month and i can assure u that this is totally value for money. This is the best I have ever used so far.
