Best Ultracompact Pocket Cameras / Digital Camera HQ Buyer's Guide
Last updated on 01/25/2011
In choosing the best sub compact cameras, a combination of features vs. image quality is a a delicate balancing act. Users who want a good pocket option often have to sacrifice zoom capability but want to still have sharp pictures, especially in low light situations. But the cheaper the camera, the more of a challenge it is to keep to this standard. The following is our list of some of the best ultra-compact point and shoots that can toe the line for every day image capture.
Quality is typically sketchy at this price point, but Panasonic puts forth a solid effort with the F3. It puts together a respectable 12.1 megapixel sensor and a fast, 4x zoom lens with optical image stabilization. It takes great flash pictures within
its (admittedly limited) range and has some great features including nine-point focusing and high
speed single point focusing, face detection, and Panasonic's excellent Intelligent Auto Mode
which balances focus and exposure for the best-looking shots in any given situation. In short, it's a solid snapshooter, nothing more. As long as you set your expectations accordingly, you should be happy with this little guy.
At under $300, it’s hard not to like
the Canon SD1400 IS. The SD line has been a consistent performer and the SD1400IS is no
different. It's also their slimmest ultra-compact to date. Key features include quick startup and auto focus, as well as the stellar DIGIC IV
processor and an upgraded 4x zoom that will
handle most small groups and portraits quite nicely. It does have a few flaws, like the noise that steadily creeps in above ISO 200, and you
won’t see anything of detail while on a photo safari. But for
parties and those kiddie moments, it’s a great point-and-shoot
option to stuff in your pocket. And with the ability to shoot HD video in 720p, video on the
go is both crisp and convenient. It's available in four colors.
Sony always puts out sexy ultra-compacts, but the WX5 actually includes some exciting tech inside as well, using every trick in the book to help it outperform your typical small-sensor pocket camera. It can shoot up to 10
frames per second and uses some software magic to create low-noise composite images. It's apparently capable to shooting rudimentary 3D images too. All this comes in a truly
sleek and minuscule camera body featuring a 5x zoom, 1080i HD video, and
a 3-inch touchscreen. Whew. All that for a reasonable $299.
Best Ultracompact Pocket Cameras / Digital Camera HQ Buyer's Guide Comments & Questions (write your own!)
A potential gift for xmas (Mark Kong — 11/25/2011)
I have a Sony DSC W150 Cybershot 3 inch 5X screen with optical viewfinder which I like. My hobby is close-up cover pics of fresh fruits for local magazine cover and family close-ups. Question: Is the Sony W300 the next pocket upgrade and does it have a 3 inch screen and optical viewfinder also price
reply to this comment
Compact Camera with zoom, continuous shots, good pics in low light, noise control. (Peggy Wentworth — 10/10/2011)
Hello Liam McCabe :
Looking for a megazoom with stabilizer, continuous shots, good pics in low light, and noise control...not concerned too much about GPS or video. Peggy 10/9/2011
reply to this comment
Looking for a megazoom with stabilizer, continuous shots, good pics in low light, and noise control...not concerned too much about GPS or video. Peggy 10/9/2011
Pocket Camera with Viewfinder (John — 09/04/2011)
I'm looking for a pocket digital camera with a view finder.
reply to this comment
Does it really have a viewfinder? (DR Win — 08/23/2011)
I'm looking for a small camera with a viewfinder. Based on your comments, I looked at the CanonSD4000 IS specs, reviews, and product lit online, thinking to buy one. No mention of any sort of viewfinder, just an LCD. And in the product illustrations/images, there's nothing that looks like a viewfinder. Does it really have one?
reply to this comment
lens lock? (Sharon Fleury — 08/15/2011)
are there any out there that the zoom /lens locks I loved my canon but I carry in my pocket and I guess the lens comes out while in my pocket and broke it. Other than that I ove my canon. Sharon
reply to this comment
Need suggession to buy Digital Camera (Nagaraju — 03/31/2011)
I am looking for Digi cam...kindly suggesst me good one
reply to this comment
Camera Size vs. Picture Quality (CKS — 03/20/2011)
I am so torn. I want a very small, handy camera to slip into my pocket that will take great quality pix of my family and vacation spots. I took my old Exilim 7.2 everywhere and wore it out! And yet - picture quality should be the top priority. I just bought the new Canon A3300 IS thinking the pix quality would be even better, but it doesn't seem to be so - I should have known better. Maybe I'd be better off with something a little larger that isn't so pocket-friendly but has the best picture quality possible. If so, what camera would that be? The reviews are making my head spin.
reply to this comment
view finder (Rosemary — 03/11/2011)
Does anyone make a small camera with view finder?
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (03/11/2011)
reply to this comment
Ann (02/28/2011)
I am looking for a camera that has a quick shutter response when you press the trigger. under $200.00
reply to this comment
Zoom during Video (Barry Chertov — 02/06/2011)
I'm looking for an ultra compact (or the smallest available) that support zooming during video. It's so hard to find that info! Anybody know for sure which cameras support that??
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (02/10/2011)
Most cameras don't zoom during video because the cheap mics can pick up the zoom noise of the motors. Some try to compensate with digital zoom, but all that does is enlarge the pixels, making washed out colors, pronounced camera shake and artifacting. It's a bag of hurt. Better to zoom in, then start record.
Note that most pros don't zoom while recording.
reply to this comment
Note that most pros don't zoom while recording.
Difference between the Canon Sd 940IS and the Canon SD1400IS (Dora — 12/17/2010)
Dora 12/16/10
I am looking to purchase a new camera within the canon family just for taking pics of friends and family and perhaps for concerts. I am torn between the canon SD940IS and the canon SD1400 IS. Which will you say is better and performs better in low lighting situations? thanks
reply to this comment
I am looking to purchase a new camera within the canon family just for taking pics of friends and family and perhaps for concerts. I am torn between the canon SD940IS and the canon SD1400 IS. Which will you say is better and performs better in low lighting situations? thanks
by James DeRuvo (12/17/2010)
I'd recommend going over to Imaging-Resource.com and doing a side by side comparisons with their image comparison utility. You'll see the differences right away. I'd also check flickr out searching for models in the tag search. You'll see real world examples of how both perform.
But I think either camera will work for you.
reply to this comment
But I think either camera will work for you.
Clyde Boone (12/01/2010)
I'm thinking of haveing my KODAK DX1490 10x zoom 4 MP refurbished for $171 by Kodak. Do you think I can do better?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (12/02/2010)
Absolutely. The rule of thumb is, if it costs more than 50% what you originally paid for it, you're better off getting a new camera. And for $171, you can get one that that has more MP, shorter shutter lag, and better performance.
reply to this comment
help (jamie — 11/28/2010)
Hi i already have a DSLR camera but want a compact camera to bring with me anywhere I go. Can you recommend something below $200 that can produce quality pics not will be put to shame by my dslr cam. and something for lowlight. Thanks
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (12/01/2010)
The highest rated at the price point is the Panasonic ZS5. Panasonic is making some great cameras these days, so it's a goodie.
reply to this comment
kebe (11/23/2010)
what is the best compact camera with these three top wishes...small..can see view in bright light..and takes pictures in low light
reply to this comment
r l (11/14/2010)
is the canon sd960 worth it if i can get it for 144?
also does it take good pics and videos?
reply to this comment
also does it take good pics and videos?
Liam McCabe (11/15/2010)
Yeah that's a good price for that camera, I'd say go for it.
reply to this comment
l d (11/14/2010)
could you recommend a good ultra compact preferably canon with the best possible image and video quality under 300
reply to this comment
Steve (11/03/2010)
My wife wants a subcompact camera, mostly for taking pictures and videos of our baby. Compactness, indoor (low light or flash) performance, and minimal delay between pictures (baby smiles can be fleeting) are key features in that order. We are looking to spend less than $200. So far we are looking at Canon SD940, Canon SD1300/1400, and Panasonic FH20. Any advice?
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (11/03/2010)
All of those are solid cameras. Of those, I'm going to recommend the SD1300/SD1400 in this case because they're smaller than the FH20 -- picture quality and speed are pretty similar, though the zoom capability is much shorter (you might not need that anyway). SD1300 is cheaper, SD1400 takes HD video and is smaller. Either one is great.
reply to this comment
Looking for a fast camera (k9pack — 10/30/2010)
I am looking for a small camera that is easy to take everywhere that can handle both indoor (low light) and outdoor light well and will take pictures quickly. By the time my current camera has 'saved', I've missed the next shot!
reply to this comment
Need recommendation on following priorities (Barbara — 10/15/2010)
I'm looking for the following priorities:
1) fast shutter and shot-to-shot speed for action/low blur shots; 2) below $300 if possible; 3) best pic quality available for price range, esp. low light; 4) mostly auto, some manual with image stabilize; 4) I really want an optical viewfinder, feel most comfortable with them, espec. for plays, etc.)
I would truly appreciate serious feedback!
I've been looking at a Canon SD4000-IS, but mainly like the speed, pic quality and viewfinder. I'd like a lower price, but don't want to be unhappy, so will go up if necessary. Video is not a priority to me, but just a nice convience to be available.
Thanks in advance for serious advice. (I know the view finder cuts my choices down, but would make a big difference in my comfort level! I just can't seem to get used to using the video screen ... I'm used to 35-mm!)
reply to this comment
1) fast shutter and shot-to-shot speed for action/low blur shots; 2) below $300 if possible; 3) best pic quality available for price range, esp. low light; 4) mostly auto, some manual with image stabilize; 4) I really want an optical viewfinder, feel most comfortable with them, espec. for plays, etc.)
I would truly appreciate serious feedback!
I've been looking at a Canon SD4000-IS, but mainly like the speed, pic quality and viewfinder. I'd like a lower price, but don't want to be unhappy, so will go up if necessary. Video is not a priority to me, but just a nice convience to be available.
Thanks in advance for serious advice. (I know the view finder cuts my choices down, but would make a big difference in my comfort level! I just can't seem to get used to using the video screen ... I'm used to 35-mm!)
Liam McCabe (10/15/2010)
Yeah the viewfinder is tough to find on compact cameras these days. If you want decent quality in poor lighting, you're gonna have to pay for it. The SD4000 seems to mostly fit your criteria and it's one of the better deals that you'll find, so I'd say you'll probably be relatively happy with it.
reply to this comment
jaydee (10/14/2010)
No Canon S90? This is not an objective observation of compacts.
reply to this comment
Video feature (Nikki — 10/09/2010)
Really want a compact camera that takes great video... any recommendations? I'm currently looking at the Canon Powershot 1400. ALSO do any cameras come with a light that comes on for video?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (10/12/2010)
I really like the Casio Fh100. It has a 10x optical zoom, shoots 720p and has some nifty features that just make the camera fun.
As for a video light built in, I don't know of any point and shoot that has a dedicated video light. But you can get a superbright LED light that screws into the tripod mount. I have one from CameraBright that works quite well.
reply to this comment
As for a video light built in, I don't know of any point and shoot that has a dedicated video light. But you can get a superbright LED light that screws into the tripod mount. I have one from CameraBright that works quite well.
Good at handling shake (Elizabeth Proell — 09/03/2010)
I'm looking for a small lightweight camera that handles shake well as I will most often will be taking shots as a passenger on a motorcycle while on vacation in foreign countries (outside US). I'm also concerned about battery life & recharging batteries overseas--I don't want to carry more luggage than I must. Any ideas would be appreciated.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (09/07/2010)
Thing is, I don't really think a point and shoot camera lens will be fast enough to compensate for the back of a motorcycle. I'd consider maybe one of those micro 4/3s cameras like the Olympus E-P1 or the Panasonic GF1 at least you can get a faster lens that way.
reply to this comment
Lenny (09/01/2010)
Trying to decide between Canon SD1300 and Panasonic FH20 and would like to know which performs better under low light. Also, where would I find a statistic that reflects this in the spec sheets?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (09/02/2010)
I think the FH20 has better color at higher ISOs but they both begin to fall apart once you get to ISO 800 or above. So try and keep it under that no matter what camera you choose. But it seems the FH20 has better color. The Sd1300 seems washed out.
reply to this comment
AJ (08/04/2010)
Thanks. I thought the zoom "button" was slightly annoying in the store and I was worried I would only get more annoyed with it over time. How does it feel when you're really using it?
reply to this comment
AJ (08/03/2010)
Hi, I need a recommendation for a lightweight camera with at least 7X that will take high quality photos on the spur of the moment, for less than $400. Finalists were Sony w370, Sony H55, Olympus 7030, Nikon Coolpix S6000, Canon Powershot SX210 but I'm open to any new ones. Thanks!
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (08/04/2010)
I like the Canon SX210.
reply to this comment
karen (08/03/2010)
I'm looking to buy a pocket camera-I have the canon 50D, & want a great little camera to have on me when it's not convenient to lug around the big one. Being that i already own a few canons, I'm looking at the S90,the SX210IS, or possibly the SD4000IS. Basically, i take nature shots, macro flower shots, as well as family pics. I'm a little unsure which would be the best for me--any suggestions? Thanks!
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (08/03/2010)
You'll get the best image quality from either the S90 or SD4000. The SX210 has a huge zoom which can some in handy for shooting animals out in nature. But if it's a zoom you want, you can do better with something like the Panasonic ZS5/ZS7 or Casio FH100 -- the interfaces are pretty easy to pick up, though I do understand your reasoning for wanting to stick with the familiar Canon setup.
If the zoom isn't as much of a consideration for you, S90 and SD4000 both have great image quality, definitely take better shots than the SX210, or any big zoomer out there for that matter. They're designed to excel in low lighting, but they'll work well in the daylight out in nature as well. Which one you choose is a matter of personal preference -- the SD4000 has a "cooler" design and more "modern" touch interface, but as a dSLR user, you might appreciate the setup of the S90.
Don't know all the specifics of what you're looking for, but hope that this helps.
reply to this comment
If the zoom isn't as much of a consideration for you, S90 and SD4000 both have great image quality, definitely take better shots than the SX210, or any big zoomer out there for that matter. They're designed to excel in low lighting, but they'll work well in the daylight out in nature as well. Which one you choose is a matter of personal preference -- the SD4000 has a "cooler" design and more "modern" touch interface, but as a dSLR user, you might appreciate the setup of the S90.
Don't know all the specifics of what you're looking for, but hope that this helps.
karen (08/04/2010)
Thanks for the input. How does the quality of the auto focus shots on the S90 compare to those on the SD4000? I figure that if I'm getting a compact, I might like to use it for quick point & shoot pics, though I'll probably also want to have control too. Also, I heard that the S90 is awkward to handle-hard to get a good grip on it. Should this be a concern? Camera coolness is good; however, I'd rather get the best bang for the buck. Thanks again-I appreciate the input.
reply to this comment
Need a recommendation please! (Libby — 08/03/2010)
Can anyone make a recommendation for a novice? I am looking for a pocket size camera that takes decent video with sound. I was told to make sure the camera has a reasonable optical zoom that works while taking video. I am trying to keep the price below $250 if at all possible. Any suggestions? Thank you!
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (08/04/2010)
Well, IMHO I don't think there is "decent sound" on a point and shoot camera, especially one below $250. The fact is point and shoots have cheap omnidirectional microphones which makes for tinny monoral sound.
But the Panasonic ZS5 records in HD, that's pretty good for in your price range.
reply to this comment
But the Panasonic ZS5 records in HD, that's pretty good for in your price range.
Bridgit (07/21/2010)
I need help deciding what is the best digital camera for me and my family. The panasonic DMC ZS7 or the panasonic DMC ZS5, DMC FH20 or the canon S90? Please help I am getting overwhelmed! I would like to be able to take movies as well. Thanks!
reply to this comment
Chris Weigl (07/21/2010)
The Canon S90 is a step above the others, offering better image quality and a faster lens. It doesn't take HD video though so that might disqualify it. The ZS7 and ZS5 are virtually identical other than the addition of GPS in the ZS7. If you don't need that then save some money and get the ZS5. The FH20 is a fantastic deal but the lens isn't as sharp as the ZS5. It is smaller though. You'll most likely be happy with either.
reply to this comment
Bridgit (07/21/2010)
Please can you advise as to which camera would be better overall, the Canon S90 or the Canon SD1400?
reply to this comment
Chris Weigl (07/21/2010)
The Canon S90 is bigger and therefore less pocketable, but takes much better images and has a faster lens. It's the better choice in that regard.
reply to this comment
Deciding between Canon compact cameras (Marlene — 07/21/2010)
Marlene 7/20/10
Trying to decide between Canon cameras SD780, SD940, and SD1200. I would like good image quality and am not sure if that can be had with a camera that does HD movie in this price range?
reply to this comment
Trying to decide between Canon cameras SD780, SD940, and SD1200. I would like good image quality and am not sure if that can be had with a camera that does HD movie in this price range?
Chris Weigl (07/21/2010)
Of those three the SD940 is by far the best choice with both HD movie and a wide-angle 4x zoom. It's probably fine for what you're looking for.
reply to this comment
illuminate me! (KC SPOON — 07/19/2010)
hi... saw both the canon s90 and the canon sx210is mentioned here recently. i am looking closely at both of these - my priorities are great low-light capabilities (the best that can be expected from a compact), decent manual control (i like to play with depth-of-field) and of course overall picture quality. i am leaning towards the 210 because of its HD video, which seems to get great ratings, and it's impressive zoom lens. but if the s90 is superior to the 210 for low light, i might reconsider... what do y'all think... and is there anything else i should look at before deciding? shutter lag, burst mode, aperture priority mode, great stabilization performance are all things i look at, too. won't consider anything with a zoom smaller than that of the s90. (3.8x)
thanks so very much for any input! :)
reply to this comment
thanks so very much for any input! :)
Liam McCabe (07/19/2010)
The S90 is much, much better-suited for low light shots than the SX210 -- in fact, if low-light is that much of a priority, just cross the SX210 off your list of potential cameras. As Canons go, you want to look at the S90 or SD4000, both of which are built to work well in low light, in ways that the average point and shoot just can't pull off.
The prices are pretty similar right now, and the image quality and speed of operation appear to basically be the same.
A few differences: The S90 has a manual control ring, can shoot RAW (uncompressed) images, and has a more "traditional" interface. The SD4000 has a sleeker touch-screen and scroll-wheel interface, can shoot HD video and high-speed video. Either one seems to be a solid choice.
reply to this comment
The prices are pretty similar right now, and the image quality and speed of operation appear to basically be the same.
A few differences: The S90 has a manual control ring, can shoot RAW (uncompressed) images, and has a more "traditional" interface. The SD4000 has a sleeker touch-screen and scroll-wheel interface, can shoot HD video and high-speed video. Either one seems to be a solid choice.
article gone? (Miyuki — 07/17/2010)
?? What happened to the list? I only see the recommendation of Canon S90 and a picture of Panasonic F3 in the article?
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (07/19/2010)
That's bizarre -- I'm seeing all of it now, but we have been getting some error messages lately, working to fix it all. Try reloading the page if it happens again.
reply to this comment
Tina (07/14/2010)
New Lumix FP3 is pretty good. Light weight, affordable with touchscreen.
reply to this comment
High Quality Vacation Camera (Lew — 07/10/2010)
I'm looking for a new travel camera with high image quality, good battery life and macro capabilities, if possible. I plan to leave my Nikon dSLR at home.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (07/14/2010)
The Canon SX120 has a real nice macro, decent zoom and photo quality. It's a tad bulky for a pocket camera though. Check out the Canon SD line.
reply to this comment
john (06/15/2010)
would this be a good camera to place in a dicapac
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (06/15/2010)
Which camera? And most manufacturers make underwater housing for specific models, so I'd advise that you go with one of those rather than a product suited for a range of cameras -- not something to risk, lest your camera get soaked.
reply to this comment
kari anne (06/15/2010)
I am a real estate agent. Looking for a pocket size camera with wide-angle that is good in low light interior shots for rooms. Would love it if it also could shoot video. Suggestions??? kari
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (06/15/2010)
All cameras shoot video, so you're all set there. To get truly good indoor low-light shots, you need to spend extra on a camera, and since you're a real estate agent, I'm sure you're willing to invest a little extra in your camera to make a good impression. Check out the Canon S90, Canon SD4000, Panasonic LX3, or Samsung TL500 for starters. Those all excel in low lighting.
reply to this comment
SPEN (06/11/2010)
Which is best_ PLEASE HELP canon ixus95IS, fujifilm finepix JV100, or Nikon coolpix S4000
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (06/11/2010)
Go Canon. Nikons are struggling in low light of late and frankly I have no opinion on the Fuji.
reply to this comment
My first digital camera--need suggestions (Tina — 06/08/2010)
I've been researching cameras for the past 3 weeks and now my head's about to explode! Any suggestions? Want good zoom, $100-200, fast shutter speed, a lens I can look through, video I can zoom, and most of all pictures that look good after getting them developed. This would be my first digital camera and when I ask other people how their pictures look from their camera, they all say, "I don't know." They all get left in the camera or on the computer. I would actually like photos. Thanks for any help I can get.
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (06/09/2010)
There aren't any cameras that fit all those criteria. Very few cheap, small cameras have viewfinders, so you might have to throw that one out the window. Zooming video is also kind of rare on cameras in this price range.
A few you might want to look at: Panasonic FH20, Sony W370, Canon SD1300. The first two have big zooms and good image quality, I believe they might even have zooming during video but I'm not positive about that. The Canon has a smaller zoom, but slightly better image quality. No HD video either.
If you want a viewfinder, check out the Canon SD1200. Very small zoom, but strong image quality and cheap.
reply to this comment
A few you might want to look at: Panasonic FH20, Sony W370, Canon SD1300. The first two have big zooms and good image quality, I believe they might even have zooming during video but I'm not positive about that. The Canon has a smaller zoom, but slightly better image quality. No HD video either.
If you want a viewfinder, check out the Canon SD1200. Very small zoom, but strong image quality and cheap.
Thanks (Tina — 06/09/2010)
Thanks for you help. I need all I can get. As you can tell, I know nothing about digital cameras. As with any purchase, I just want the best product for the best price. If there are any other suggestions, I can use them.
reply to this comment
Sony w360 (sandeep — 06/08/2010)
Here i am attaching some imgaes for Sony w360 camera which is 9000rs including 4 gb card
forums.dpreview.com/galleri...
reply to this comment
forums.dpreview.com/galleri...
Liam McCabe (06/08/2010)
Thanks for you for sharing your pictures.
reply to this comment
Jennifer Soyars (06/04/2010)
I am looking for a compact to be able to fit into a pocket and have gotten a bit overwhelmed. We have children that play sports so we want a fairly fast camera. I had been considering the sony cyber-shot DSC-wx1 and DSC-TX1 because I think the panorama option would be great when we travel, but some reviews said they had poor picture quality. Our price range is about $350 or under. Any suggestions?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (06/04/2010)
Panorama options in cameras were important when software couldn't assemble a decent pano on their own. But now, they've gotten quite good at it. So to make that option a deal breaker is really unnecessary now.
A few to check out are the Canon SX210 and the Panasonic Fh20. Both are pocket options and both have pretty good zooms.
reply to this comment
A few to check out are the Canon SX210 and the Panasonic Fh20. Both are pocket options and both have pretty good zooms.
Cathleen (06/03/2010)
I am looking at the new Canon sd1400is vs the Panasonic FH20 for my teenager to use indoors or for travel. I know the Panny costs less, but the Canon is within my price range and we have 3 other Canon's at home we are happy with. Any guidance?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (06/03/2010)
You may want to look closer at FH20 for it's 8x optical zoom, which is twice that of the SD1400is.
reply to this comment
David Deeks (05/27/2010)
For ease of use in this category and taking video is there anything better than a Canon IXUS 120IS/SD940?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (05/28/2010)
The Panasonic FH20 is comparable.
reply to this comment
DanJ (05/26/2010)
I'm interested in a compact under $300 that takes high quality photos, 4x or better zoom, movie w/audio and performs well in low light. I've read good things on the Panasonic FH20. Can you compare it to the Canon S90?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (05/27/2010)
Both are great cameras. But the FH20 gets the edge. C'Net reviews the S90 as simply average in performance, but it does get high marks for it's manual capabilities. Whereas the FH20 gets great reviews for outstanding low light images. That sells me.
reply to this comment
ASD (05/25/2010)
Any compact cameras that shoot HD video and still use Non proprietary or AA batteries? The cheaper the better in this case
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (05/25/2010)
No ultracompacts immediately come to mind. The problem is that the bodies are so small, AA batteries just don't fit in them easily. There might have been a few models a couple of years ago, but nothing shot in HD back then...I'm really struggling to think of something for you. You could get something like the Canon SX20 -- it won't fit in your pocket, but it does take AAs and HD video. But lithium-ions really are the popular way to go for manufacturers these days.
Can anybody else think of any models for this person?
reply to this comment
Can anybody else think of any models for this person?
Carrie (05/24/2010)
I ama total novice on camera but am looking for a general pocket camera that will take fairly good family pictures at home and on vacation. Have no idea on camera specs but was looking at the Nikon S4000 and Canon Ixus 100.
I am totally open to suggestions and all help is appreciated!!! My price range would be $200 - $300.
reply to this comment
I am totally open to suggestions and all help is appreciated!!! My price range would be $200 - $300.
Liam McCabe (05/25/2010)
The IXUS 100 is a solid little camera, definitely will give you better results than the S4000. The Panasonic FH20 is definitely worth a look as well -- it's much better quality than the low cost would imply.
reply to this comment
peter (05/15/2010)
which one is better canon A495 , nikon L21. Pls suggest better for blur reduction..
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (05/19/2010)
I'd go with the Canon. Neither will have very good blur reduction -- you'll need to get something with an image stabilizer, like the Canon A3000.
reply to this comment
I have also the Same Confusion about Canon A495, NikonL21 and Olyampus FE-46 (Navin Singhwane — 06/05/2010)
Which is better (overall) in these cameras
1)Cannon A495 -10 mp
2) Nikon L21 -8 mp
3) Olympus FE-46 -12mp
Please suggest which one is better in above listed cameras.
Either you can mail me at navi12780@gmail.com
Thanks
Navin
reply to this comment
1)Cannon A495 -10 mp
2) Nikon L21 -8 mp
3) Olympus FE-46 -12mp
Please suggest which one is better in above listed cameras.
Either you can mail me at navi12780@gmail.com
Thanks
Navin
Help... (Tony Brula — 05/03/2010)
I'm considering buying an utracompact, but I'm confused by the plethora of those types on the market nowadays. I'm not a novice in pix-taking (have had heavy-duty Nikons in the past), but I want something simple to take on vacations and shooting great shots. The camera that caught my attention is the Nikon Coolpix S70 that has a 3.5" touchscreen. My price range would be up to maybe $300...preferably a little less. Can anyone help me out?
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (05/03/2010)
Well, we weren't very impressed with the S70 (read the review here: digitalcamera-hq.com/produc... ). The screen is nice and big, but that camera is too expensive for the image quality you'll get.
We hate to overgeneralize, but Nikon's point and shoots leave something to be desired. Great dSLRs though.
There's also the touchscreen issue. I personally don't think that touchscreens are worth the extra money. The interface is usually harder to use than regular old buttons. And since everything is done through the screen, the batteries don't last as long as they should.
If you want to get a decent Nikon with a touchscreen, check out the S4000 (review here: digitalcamera-hq.com/produc... ). Around $200.
If you want a really good ultracompact, the Canon S1400 in the article above here is a solid option. The SD1200, last year's model, is less expensive and has a smaller zoom, but is excellent as well. I think one of those two will make you happier.
reply to this comment
We hate to overgeneralize, but Nikon's point and shoots leave something to be desired. Great dSLRs though.
There's also the touchscreen issue. I personally don't think that touchscreens are worth the extra money. The interface is usually harder to use than regular old buttons. And since everything is done through the screen, the batteries don't last as long as they should.
If you want to get a decent Nikon with a touchscreen, check out the S4000 (review here: digitalcamera-hq.com/produc... ). Around $200.
If you want a really good ultracompact, the Canon S1400 in the article above here is a solid option. The SD1200, last year's model, is less expensive and has a smaller zoom, but is excellent as well. I think one of those two will make you happier.
Replacement for Canon SD990? (Jo Morello — 04/29/2010)
Linda, thanks for the correction. I have been checking on the recommendation for the SD1200 but find that although it has an optical viewfinder, it has only a 3X optical zoom. Maybe the Panasonic will be the tiebreaker.
reply to this comment
Jo Morello (04/29/2010)
Thanks for suggesting a lower-priced Canon.I'll check out the zoom and whether it makes pretty good movies. You saved me. I was just falling in love with the SD3500--but not its price. As for the Panasonic LH20, all I can find under that number is an HDTV. Am I doing something wrong?
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (04/29/2010)
It's the Panasonic FH20.
reply to this comment
Jo Morello (04/29/2010)
Linda, thanks for the correction. I have been checking on the recommendation for the SD1200 but find that although it has an optical viewfinder, it has only a 3X optical zoom. Maybe the Panasonic will be the tiebreaker.
reply to this comment
Jo Morello (04/29/2010)
I lost my cherished Canon SD990 is last week. I've learned Canon discontinued it and I wonder why. I can replace it but it's gotten really pricey, and it did have a few flaws (weak zoom, no wide angle, etc.) Would I do better putting the money to something newer? I still want another camera with a viewfinder--one that will also make high-res images (over 300 dpi for printing) and also movies. Does anything comparable exist in an ultracompact for under $300, give or take a few bucks? Or should I just get another 990? Thanks for whatever wisdom you can share.
reply to this comment
Needs new camera (Bill — 04/22/2010)
My wife is an artist and needs a camera with a viewfinder, extended zoom but is compact. Any suggestions?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (04/27/2010)
Compact point and shoots with extended zooms is a challenge. If you weren't wanting a viewfinder, I would suggest the Panasonic FH20. It's got the fastest lens in it's class and gets great marks for low light performance, or the Canon SX200IS. But sadly, neither have a viewfinder. In fact, viewfinders are rapidly disappearing.
In fact, for a compact camera to have a large zoom, something has to give and that something is the viewfinder. The Canon SX20IS has a large zoom and viewfinder, but it's not what you call compact.
reply to this comment
In fact, for a compact camera to have a large zoom, something has to give and that something is the viewfinder. The Canon SX20IS has a large zoom and viewfinder, but it's not what you call compact.
ultra compact max £120 (si moore — 04/22/2010)
hi can any one help looking for a ultra compact, been looking at the samsung st45 & st60 can,t find many reviews looking to spend £120 max if anyone can reccomend simliar
reply to this comment
Sukhi (04/19/2010)
m looking to buy a camera withn 2-3 days...confused btwn Nikon coolpix L110, Sony cybershot DSC H20 and Sony cybershot dsc H55...need suggestion plz....
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (04/19/2010)
None of these are ultracompacts, but the H20 is a proven winner.
reply to this comment
Compare Canon S90 to Nikon S4000 (richard c. — 04/17/2010)
Compare the Canon S90 to the Nikon S4000 in terms of picture quality and ease of use?
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (04/19/2010)
Canon S90 is far and away the superior camera. It also costs much more. S4000 will be easier to use, but the S90 just takes far, far better pictures. There's no comparison between the two.
reply to this comment
Best small AA camera? (Opi — 04/13/2010)
What's the best compact camera that still uses AA batteries?
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (04/14/2010)
For my money, the Canon A1100 is a great camera for a great price, and still uses AAs. It's not an ultracompact, but then again ultracompacts don't typically use AA batteries anymore -- takes up too much room in the body, makes the camera bigger. The A1100 is still quite small though.
reply to this comment
Upgrading from Kodak C743, but need viewfinder (Donna Krambeck — 04/08/2010)
I have been using my Kodak C743 for my vacations and when I want to take quick shots. Have been quite pleased with it overall since I don't like lugging around my Canon digital Rebel. I would like to upgrade the "little" one to one with more zoom, but I have to have one with a viewfinder...old habits I guess. Was looking at buying a refurbished Canon SD890, but am hesitant. Any suggestions as to what I can get? Thanks so much for your help!!
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (04/09/2010)
I understand the need for a viewfinder. It's far preferable than dealing with ambient light issues on the LCD. Plus the larger LCDs only really serve to kill your battery faster. Canon's SD line is great, but the zoom isn't really that much more, if any. The SX line is really where you want to look.
reply to this comment
Best Ultracompact for low light (Amy G. — 04/03/2010)
What are your recommendations for the best ultra compact in low light/indoor situations?
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (04/05/2010)
Hands down, the Canon S90.
reply to this comment
How about adding these (Ranjeet Rain — 03/30/2010)
Built-in DLP projector, a 10ft precision GPS unit, a DPOF bridge, ability to put the flash on continuously and use it as a torch :D
Don't worry, I am not joking - this camera will retail for USD 250 in 2014.
reply to this comment
Don't worry, I am not joking - this camera will retail for USD 250 in 2014.
Liam McCabe (03/30/2010)
Sounds not that far off from what cellphones are turning into.
reply to this comment
Best compact digital camera with below attributes (Barbara Kastner — 03/19/2010)
This is what I want in a compact camera: HD movie, good battery life, wide angle, 10x or more zoom, 12 or more megapixels, 1/2 secon or less shutter lag
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (03/20/2010)
Then you'll have to look dslr. The Canon T1i is a good place to start.
reply to this comment
try sony h55 (demon — 06/27/2010)
10x zoom
14.megapixel
panaromic mode
reply to this comment
14.megapixel
panaromic mode
Liam McCabe (03/16/2010)
Thanks for the suggestions guys, it's definitely time for a real update to this guide. Coming next week!
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (03/17/2010)
I'm happy to help you if you need it ... hint hint
reply to this comment
Newbie camera (03/15/2010)
What about the Canon S90?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (03/17/2010)
The S90 is a nice camera using the DIGIC IV processor. Here's the review from CNet:
The good: Excellent control system for manual, semimanual shooting; fantastic wide-angle f2 lens; very good low-light photo quality.
The bad: Performance is merely average; no HD movie mode or optical zoom while recording; no optical viewfinder and a couple other design miscues.
The bottom line: As long as you're not expecting dSLR speed in a tiny body, the Canon PowerShot S90 is an excellent compact camera for advanced amateurs.
reply to this comment
The good: Excellent control system for manual, semimanual shooting; fantastic wide-angle f2 lens; very good low-light photo quality.
The bad: Performance is merely average; no HD movie mode or optical zoom while recording; no optical viewfinder and a couple other design miscues.
The bottom line: As long as you're not expecting dSLR speed in a tiny body, the Canon PowerShot S90 is an excellent compact camera for advanced amateurs.
brob (03/06/2010)
If u think poor people buy less expensive cameras or poor people are too stupid to do research then you need to get over yourself.
reply to this comment
camera (shelley — 11/29/2010)
Do you of an excellent point and shoot camera without the difficulty of the little square in the lens. Makes it difficult to take picture. Do you know of a good, all around pocket camera worthy of buying?
Thank you!
reply to this comment
Thank you!
best ultracompact? it's gotta be the DSC-TX1 (yikesmoose — 02/23/2010)
What about the Sony DSC-TX1? Your list is pathetic without it. Incredibly small at 3.75 x 2.375 x 0.656 in. It has a burst mode of ten 10 megapixel photos in just one second. Many SLR cameras don't have that. The truly seamless panoramic mode is incredible. It has a backlit CMOS sensor which theoretically allows for better low-light performance. Touch screen controls lets you choose manual focus with the tap of finger if you so choose. This camera is incredible.
reply to this comment
mtggirl2010 (12/20/2010)
I heard that the Sony has to have special software and it's finicky to work with - I already have software I like so am reluctant to but this camera although it seems to be pretty nifty
reply to this comment
Vicki (01/30/2010)
Need a recommendation for an ultracompact that takes pictures quickly and sharply for taking pictures of small children
reply to this comment
celeste (02/14/2010)
the casio ex-fc100 is a pretty good bet, it takes really, really fast pics that are of pretty darn good quality :D
reply to this comment
John grazinsky (03/07/2010)
Good question, Lewis Carroll.
reply to this comment
want some samples and catalog (john A — 07/26/2010)
my email address john_marks10@yahoo.com
reply to this comment
twitter-45407308 (10/23/2009)
i dun think these are one of the best one'sssssss ;OOOOOO :SSSS.....but yeah i count them in good list...
reply to this comment
