Best Cameras For Hobbyists
Last updated on 03/31/2011
Hobbyists are happy to shoot anything, anywhere, with any camera. Gear is a secondary concern for the hobbyist (leave the pixel-peeping to the enthusiasts) but a new camera with some extra power under the hood is always enticing. Below are our picks for the hobbyists out there: versatile cameras with rich feature sets, manual control, and strong image quality, but user-friendly enough to still just pick and go. If you're shopping for a loved one that loves to take pictures, start below.
For hobbyists who want a camera that packs a punch but still fits in a pants pocket, a compact-zoom model is the way to go. The Panasonic ZS5 is at the top of the compact-zoom heap, featuring a big 12x optical zoom, 720p HD video, speedy performance, full manual and automatic controls, and most importantly, excellent image quality for a compact camera in this price range. Also take a look at its beefed up sibling, the Panasonic ZS7, which ships with built-in GPS, a larger screen, and a different HD video format. They're otherwise identical, and both are excellent choices for a budding hobbyist.
[Read our full Panasonic Lumix FZ100 Review]
Superzooms like the Panasonic FZ100 get a lot of attention from new photographers, since they resemble more advanced digital single-lens reflex (dSLR) models. While the FZ100 is really an advanced point-and-shoot with a huge lens, its versatility out of the box is unmatched, and its sure to excite any photo hobbyist in your family with its enormous 24x zoom, 11 frame-per-second burst shooting mode, 1080i HD video, and 3-inch tilt-and-swivel LCD to name a few of the features. If the FZ100 seems like a bit much, take a look at the stripped-down FZ40.
[Read our full hands-on review] When a hobbyist is ready to start working with lenses, manual focus, and the bells and whistles of dSLRs, an entry-level model like the Canon T1i/500D is a good place to start. The interface and manual controls are definitely in the big leagues, but auto mode is simple enough for a beginner to snap some solid, fuss-free shots. The specs are impressive for a camera at this price, including a 15.1 megapixel sensor, HD video, and a 3-inch screen. The T1i's big brother, the T2i, is the more popular camera these days because it's the latest model, but the T1i has everything for a hobbyist still learning his or her way around a camera for a few hundred dollars less.
[Read our full Olympus PEN E-PL1 Review]
A mirrorless camera like the Olympus PEN E-PL1 is another worthwhile option for a hobbyist ready to step from a point-and-shoot to an interchangeable-lens model. Images are nearly dSLR-quality, but the body is significantly lighter and smaller than any dSLR. The trade-off is that there's no optical viewfinder (electronic only), but for anyone who's used to a compact camera, it's a very minor distinction. What's more, the E-PL1's interface will look instantly familiar to point-and-shoot users, so it's not as intimidating as a dSLR's backside. Some dSLR purists scoff at mirrorless models like this, but new users will find a whole lot to love -- at a fair price, too.
Best Cameras For Hobbyists Comments & Questions (write your own!)
xmas gift (cross — 12/13/2012)
I need a good camera for my husband, he is a hobbyist. He got good eyes for pictures, so I need a good one that last long, it's not expensive and not complicated .
reply to this comment
Greg May (03/01/2013)
Check out the latest updates on the left hand side- and there are lots of great models on the way.
reply to this comment
WANT JUST ONE CAMERA - WHICH SHOULD I BUY? (TOLU — 09/18/2012)
Which is a better camera to have, for someome who wants to invest in just one good camera.
Canon SX40 HS 12.1MP Digital Camera with 35x Wide Angle Optical Image Stabilized Zoom and 2.7-Inch Vari-Angle Wide LCD / / OR / /Canon EOS Rebel T3 Digital SLR
The main aim of buying the camera is to take good quality pictures, the durability of the camera also comes highly into play here.
reply to this comment
Canon SX40 HS 12.1MP Digital Camera with 35x Wide Angle Optical Image Stabilized Zoom and 2.7-Inch Vari-Angle Wide LCD / / OR / /Canon EOS Rebel T3 Digital SLR
The main aim of buying the camera is to take good quality pictures, the durability of the camera also comes highly into play here.
Chris Weigl (09/18/2012)
The T3 will give you much better image quality in basically every situation, but you'll need to buy the camera with the two lens kit to get even close to the versatility of the SX40. If you're willing to carry around a bulkier camera then I'd go with the T3.
reply to this comment
help, i am a beginner and want a really good advanced point and shoot (marc518 — 03/05/2012)
i am selecting my first digital camera and wish pictures to be sharp to 16x20. i am considering the canon g12, s100, nikon p310, and canon sx40 nikon p510. i don't really think i need extended zoom, but which i really better at nice sharp pictures? i am aware that many photograpers don't shoot raw, but would the nikon p7100 be better than the canon in any other respects.
reply to this comment
help, i am a beginner and want a really good advanced point and shoot (marc post — 03/12/2012)
i want a camera that can definately enlarge to 8x10 and perhaps 16xx20. i want fine details, raw is optional, control over the camera. i am aware that a lot of professional photographers do not use raw. i am considering the canon s100,g12 or the sx40, and the nikons p310,p500 p510 tho i don't think i will need that much zoom. also the nikon p7100 as it now sells for $400. is that a better alternative to the canon s100.? i have not ruled out the nikon d3100 refurbished for $499. help.
reply to this comment
photographing coins for e-bay sales (Tom — 12/12/2011)
I need recommedations for best type of camera (and recommended brands and models) for photographing small fine detail, like close up shots of small objects like dimes to accompany ads on e-bay. A friend has a Sony DSC-W530 & loves it but the reviews of Amazon customers who own that camera scare me. Many thanks!!!
reply to this comment
Help me choose (Cheryl S. — 09/18/2011)
Help!!! I have been shooting for 3 years. I do alot of macro and nature shots, a little portait, near and distance. I was using a Canon SX130 IS. Was very successful in program mode. Never used automatic. Wanted to upgrade to a higher quality advanced point and shoot . Got the Canon SX30 IS. Was very disappointed. Have used it for a year and cannot get the quality I got with the lesser camera. A lot of noise in distance photos. Yellowing in indoor shots. Have even used auto setting but to no avail. Want an advanced point and shoot or crossover that delivers quality distance shots, macro, and portraits. Does such a camera exist? I carry my camera with me all the time so a dSLR is not practical.
reply to this comment
hight end point and shoot or low end dslr (Michelle — 08/08/2011)
I am a hobbyist and love to take pictures of close up and nature. I am taking a trip to Italy and would like to upgrade my camera. I would like 10X or more optical zoom, good shooting in low light (mine is useless from dusk on or in the woods), close up pictures, and reasonable speed between pictures. I would love to have a dslr but have been looking at higher end point and shoot because I can only spend around $400. Any tips would be appreciated.
Thanks
reply to this comment
Thanks
Liam McCabe (08/09/2011)
Check out the Canon SX230 and Nikon S8100 or S9100 -- all long-zoom cameras with good low-light performance. There aren't any compact cameras that can truly shoot well in low light, but these do much better than most.
reply to this comment
Marilena A. (06/15/2011)
hello, it's been a while that i am searching for a camera in order to upload some photos on my blog,so because I don't know anything could you suggest me one between 200-300$! Thank you!
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (06/16/2011)
reply to this comment
What did you choose? (JG — 06/13/2011)
hi, what did you finally choose to replace you FZ50? Did you go for the FZ100? or something else? I am looking to replace my FZ50 too. Though I was also pleased with the FZ50 but some main things I would like to improve on are; faster & more acurate Auto Focus, faster start up, better quality view finder, faster burst mode.
Any tips??
Thanks,
John
reply to this comment
Any tips??
Thanks,
John
camera lenses (steve peregrin — 05/11/2011)
Which 5X-8X camera's contain glass lenes?
reply to this comment
Buying a new diital camera (Joanne Macdonald- joanne_flower@hotmail.com — 02/20/2011)
I am looking for an easy point and shoot camera...family, travel pics. I want a long lasting battery (not aa or aaa recharageables) I has been suggested that a Samsung 12MP Digital Camera (ST60) - Red - or a Canon Powershot 10.0MP Digital Camera (A3000IS) or a Sony Cyber-Shot 12.1MP Digital Camera (DSC-W310B) which one would you suggest me using? Hoping to hear from you today as I am going to purchase very soon but would love to hear what you say about these cameras? Joanne M.
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (02/22/2011)
Of those, the Canon is the best you'll get.
reply to this comment
would you suggest any other camera? (Joanne Macdonald- joanne_flower@hotmail.com — 02/26/2011)
would you suggest any other type of camera??
reply to this comment
Jeff Hughes (02/17/2011)
I've been using a Fujifilm S6000fd which seems to put out some nice quilty photo's but would like better image quality .. Also have been frustrated with the lack of true manual focus & metering lacks some .. Will image quality of a Dslr Say a Pentax K-x, K-r or CanonT1i be that more noticeable (Not to worried about the video) .. I shoot mostly landscapes but use my camera for all kinds of work .. Thanks
reply to this comment
Chris Weigl (02/18/2011)
Yes, the Pentaxes and Canon will be MUCH better. You'll be amazed at the difference. Try and price out what lenses you would get and see which system works best for you.
reply to this comment
mike b. (02/02/2011)
I would like to purchase a camera with a view finder on it. It should be one with excellant quality under 400.00 any suggestions. thanks
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (02/02/2011)
You have a lot of options at that point, but they're all superzoom/extended zoom cameras -- not a bad thing! Off the top of my head, I'd day check out the Panasonic FZ100 or FZ40, Canon SX30, or even Fuji HS10 (the HS20 comes out in a month or so, if you can wait).
reply to this comment
sd (02/01/2011)
This is my first camera.
what is the difference between canon sx130is and panasonic fh22.
which one is best one?
please suggest me i am so confused.
reply to this comment
what is the difference between canon sx130is and panasonic fh22.
which one is best one?
please suggest me i am so confused.
Liam McCabe (02/02/2011)
SX130 has a longer zoom, muuuuch bigger body (it won't fit in a pocket), runs on AA batteries, to name a few differences. FH22 has a touchscreen, shorter zoom, but smaller body.
reply to this comment
holysomething (01/26/2011)
Panasonic FZ100
from $69.89 <--- What?
reply to this comment
from $69.89 <--- What?
Liam McCabe (01/26/2011)
Sorry, not real. Faulty listing from one of our merchant partners -- we've contacted them and told them to remove it, should be gone.
reply to this comment
Aarcee (12/26/2010)
I travel a lot and in the past have been taking pictures with point and shoot cameras. I find it frustrating that I cannot get enough zoom or wide angles when I need them. Also as I get older, I find that the viewfinder is not clear enough for me. As a belated Christmas present, I would like to buy myself a digital SLR camera with an upper limit of 800-1000 USD. I am interested in a camera that will allow me photograph wildlife, details in architrecture, sculptures and paintings, indoor photos. I will be printing some of these into large prints (8 x10 or 10x12, for example) and am interested in them as near to professional photos as possible. This may be a tall order for my budget but would you recommend a camera that meets my requirements? Thank you.
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (12/28/2010)
Since you've been using point and shoots, you'll find that any dSLR turns out shots that look truly excellent to you. Since you have varied interests in shooting, I'd say save some money on the camera body, and invest in an extra lens or two. You could go with a mid-priced camera like the Canon 500D, Nikon D5000/D3100, or Pentax K-x, which will run you $450-600 including a standard 18-55mm kit lens. Then, take some of the leftover money and buy something like an 18-135mm zoom lens (which will come in handy for long-range wildlife shots) or a fixed-length "prime" lens for more detailed shots of paintings/sculptures. So basically, don't spend everything you have on the camera itself -- leave extra for the lenses.
reply to this comment
liveandletlive13` (11/30/2010)
Im not sure if my last comment came through or not but i'll recap what I said. Im starting to get into photography and my sony cybershot DSCW300 which had 13.6 MP and a carl zeiss lens recently died in the sea so id like to get a new camera. Firstly I'd like to know if a camera is better if it has more megapixels (i.e above 10) and secondly id like to know whether I should stick to this camera and brand or change over to a nikon, panasonic, canon? Oh yeh and lastly what lens is better; Carl Zeiss/Leica? Budget can be $300-$400. Cheers.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (12/02/2010)
It's a common myth that more MP is better. It isn't. In fact, the more MP you have, the greater chip size you need or the camera becomes LESS sensitive to light, not more and that invites more noise in low light, something the Sony's are particularly vulnerable to at high ISOs.
And considering that a snapshots sweet spot is around 6MP and you won't really see the benefit of those 14+MP cameras until poster size prints, it's somewhat of an overkill. So pay attention to the size of the CCD chip. That tells the tale.
Panasonic is making great cameras right now including the ZS5, ZS7 and FH20. Canon's S95 gets great marks.
reply to this comment
And considering that a snapshots sweet spot is around 6MP and you won't really see the benefit of those 14+MP cameras until poster size prints, it's somewhat of an overkill. So pay attention to the size of the CCD chip. That tells the tale.
Panasonic is making great cameras right now including the ZS5, ZS7 and FH20. Canon's S95 gets great marks.
Jessica (11/18/2010)
I'm looking for a camera that is compact enough to carry around every day, but shoots well in low-light and is fast enough to capture children in motion. I feel like DSLRs are just too big to lug around for everyday and am looking at the Canon G12 or S95. Will they meet my needs for fast and low-light shooting?
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (11/19/2010)
Yep, those are both great options for what you're looking for.
reply to this comment
Same need (javier — 11/06/2010)
Yes, I would like the same. When you find something, let me know, please.
reply to this comment
Need to Buy A Good Digital Camera ( — 10/28/2010)
In the next couple of weeks i am going to buy my first digital camera.my budget is $200 to $300.I want a camera which have some manual settings also,because i want to know more about photography through it.i want a camera which contain good optical zoom,good low light photography facility,face,smile detection, hd video recording capability(will be great if it contains AVCHD),
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (10/29/2010)
That's a lot to ask for in that budget. However, Panasonic's ZS7 has manual options, 12x optical zoom and 720p HD video. Smile detection, however, is exclusive to Sony.
reply to this comment
Need to Buy A Good Digital Camera ( — 10/29/2010)
thank u for replying,actually i don't know much more about Panasonic cameras,so if u can just tell me which brands which camera to choose between canon and sony and Panasonic,in that price range,with some features that i have already asked.
reply to this comment
what camera should i buy? (april — 10/25/2010)
What camera should I buy? I am partial to Canons. I need the best for taking lots of people and children/baby pictures. Need a camera that performs well indoors. Willing to spend $500 give or take. Like to shoot on auto and some limited manual modes. Interested to see your recommendations.
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (10/25/2010)
If you're partial to Canons, go with the S95 or G12. You should check out our enthusiast roundup too, the cameras fit your budget and preferences:
digitalcamera-hq.com/round_...
reply to this comment
digitalcamera-hq.com/round_...
Linda (10/03/2010)
what camera does not have a delay when shooting?
reply to this comment
Chris Weigl (10/03/2010)
All compacts have some amount of delay, you'll need to buy a large DSLR to escape entirely. Still, cameras are getting better and the newest Sonys, Canons and Panasonics aren't half bad.
reply to this comment
Canon AE-1 (Greg Kaufmann — 10/01/2010)
I have a 35MM Canon AE-1. I want to buy a dslr that would use the wide angle and zoom lens's i allready have. Please let me know if there is a dslr body that would work for me.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (10/01/2010)
Can't. Different lens mounts. Sorry.
reply to this comment
Carol (08/29/2010)
I'm trying to decide on an upgrade from a kodak M763 (small but takes pretty good pics). I also have an older larger fuji that's 3.1 mp with 6x zoom. I think I'd like 10x? zoom with a viewfinder and not sure about mp. Still want a fairly small camera that isn't too hard to carry around. I've been looking at lots of reviews and am totally confused. Don't want to spend more than $200-250 at this point. Enjoy photography and want to learn more. Suggestions, please? Thanks much.
reply to this comment
Chris Weigl (08/30/2010)
I'd recommend the Panasonic ZS5. Good 10x zoom and definitely small enough to carry around. Also has manual controls if you want 'em.
reply to this comment
No viewfinder (Carol — 08/30/2010)
Thanks Chris,
This camera has no viewfinder. Sounds good otherwise. I had lots of trouble with my kodak even with a large LCD screen (in the sunlight). Had to just point and hope I got something good.
reply to this comment
This camera has no viewfinder. Sounds good otherwise. I had lots of trouble with my kodak even with a large LCD screen (in the sunlight). Had to just point and hope I got something good.
Casual photographer/lots of outdoor/hobby only for photo albums (Karen Wetton — 04/28/2010)
Light weight camera for snaps to print and use for scrapbooking hobby.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (04/29/2010)
Depends on your budget, but the LH20 is an excellent place to start.
reply to this comment
Carole L. Riesenberg (04/25/2010)
What about the new Pentax X90? How would you rate it among the three cameras rated here?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (04/27/2010)
It doesn't get high marks at all, quite frankly. Rating about 6/10. Here's the breakdown:
The good: Ultracompact; decent macro capabilities; swiveling lens.
The bad: Quirky ergonomics; poor performance; average image quality.
The bottom line: Ultracompact with the convenience of a swiveling lens, but poor performance and average image quality limit this 5-megapixel shooter's appeal.
reply to this comment
The good: Ultracompact; decent macro capabilities; swiveling lens.
The bad: Quirky ergonomics; poor performance; average image quality.
The bottom line: Ultracompact with the convenience of a swiveling lens, but poor performance and average image quality limit this 5-megapixel shooter's appeal.
Michael C (04/19/2010)
Lads im looking for an affordable camera im a student in secondary school.I do alot of running and im looking for a camera that will take good pictures fast!!!Any ideas???
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (04/21/2010)
When you say affordable, what's your budget? There's some great cameras under $200. The Panasonic Fh20 being the king best of the bunch, IMHO. Screaming fast lens, great low light performance. 8x optical zoom.
reply to this comment
Artist (Robyn Alatorre — 03/31/2010)
First off-- I tend to be impatient and don't like to fuss a great deal with lighting, etc. But, I am artist that needs a camera that can do two things well with minimal hassle: 1) take portrait photos, and 2) take decent high pixel photos of oil paintings. What is the best cheap camera????
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (04/01/2010)
Define cheap. What's your budget? But generically, I like the Canon SD and SX lines. Quite affordable.
reply to this comment
A definition of cheap (Robyn Alatorre — 04/01/2010)
Ideally, I'd like to spend less than $200, but would go up as far as $300
reply to this comment
Camera for distance but everyday also (Jan Pierson — 03/16/2010)
We are looking for a camera to shoot wildlife at a distance (mostly deer) but also a camera to use for everyday photos like family.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (03/17/2010)
Are you wanting to take the dSLR plunge or do you just want a point and shoot? If you're looking for a good zoom, but want everything automatic, then perhaps the Canon SX200 or the Olympus SP800UZ is to your liking. Panasonic's FZ35 is another option.
But if you're wanting to get seriously into the hobby of photography, you may want to take a long look at the Canon T1i or the Nikon D90. It all comes down to your budget.
reply to this comment
But if you're wanting to get seriously into the hobby of photography, you may want to take a long look at the Canon T1i or the Nikon D90. It all comes down to your budget.
zoheb (03/04/2010)
I will only use the camera for shooting capturing pictures of sport events, landscapes and music concerts. I was considering p100,p90 ,canon powershot sx 20 IS ...am i in the right range or i can do what i need with something smaller
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (03/05/2010)
A pod the Nikon P series. Very poor low light performance slow shot to shot times. Go with the Canon SX
reply to this comment
zoheb (03/05/2010)
when you say very poor low light....does it mean at night times or late evenings. I had almost decided on the canon but the new p100 has kinda put me in the jam ...anyone used the p100 yet ?
reply to this comment
JillF (J Fleisher — 02/28/2010)
A large portion of the photos I take are of my grandson's sports - baseball, football and basketball. I'm open to suggestions for a point and shoot that can handle this (especially in the lower light situation of basketball games in a gym.)
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (03/03/2010)
To be honest, there really isn't one. The problem you have with a point and shoot camera is shutter delay, which can be amazingly frustrating when shooting action shots like sports. Ideally, your best bet is a DSLR. But if you just don't want to take that plunge, then I'd recommend the Canon SX200IS. 10x optical zoom. Just make sure you use the available light or sports settings. And learn to prefocus, which will cut your lag by about 80%. And using a monopod would help too.
reply to this comment
Shooting sports & other moving objects (mindymac — 03/06/2011)
Not true! Several of the Panasonic point-and-shoot cameras (and probably some of the Nikon, Canon & Sony cameras also) let you target a particular person (or animal) and will follow with focus until you push the button. A DSLR is way too much for a beginner who wants to shoot family sports, etc., when there are good-quality point-and-shoot cameras with various zoom ranges and good image quality that can do the job with less cost, less equipment, less learning curve.
reply to this comment
The Right Camera (Elizabeth Richardson — 01/29/2010)
I need help in deciding what camera to buy. I want to take close up pictures that show the details of the earrings I make and place them on a web site for purchase. I want them to be top quality, clear, where when clicked on the picture enlarges to show a closeup view. Thanks. ER
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (02/04/2010)
I'd look for a camera that has an "ebay" mode. The Olympus SP models have one, IIRC. But I'd also look at investing in a good lighting box which will enable you to light and place your subject in the best possible light. [url=hammacher.com/Product/73033... has one for about $80.
But in the end, you're talking "top quality." And the only way to really achieve that is with a DSLR. Good entry level would be the Canon T1 or Nikon D90 with a good zoom lens at around 110mm.
reply to this comment
But in the end, you're talking "top quality." And the only way to really achieve that is with a DSLR. Good entry level would be the Canon T1 or Nikon D90 with a good zoom lens at around 110mm.
Thanks (Elizabeth — 02/04/2010)
Thanks for the information, I never knew about a camera lighting box. What do you think about the new panasonic lumix FZ35? I was just reviewing it. Also what exactly is the DSLR? Thanks. ER
reply to this comment
Shooting for ebay (mindymac — 03/06/2011)
The DSLR guy strikes again. He is obviously biased towards the bigger, more complex DSLRs (digital single-lens reflex cameras, with lots of functions, interchangeable lenses, mirrors to focus the light/image that flip out of the way to shoot - the "reflex" in DSLR - lots of pixels in the sensor that focuses, and lots of money to buy, even at entry-level). I learned on a film SLR, a manual Nikon that didn't even have a built-in light meter, so I REALLY learned photography, a long, long time ago. I moved up to a Nikon FM, with meter and autofocus, but as soon as digital came available, I moved over. (Film & processing for serious shooting is just too expensive, purists be damned.)
Let me say that any of the point-and-shoot mid-range and higher-quality point-and-shoots will give you the quality you need for shooting for eBay. You are not going to be making 16"x20" prints for display, you are going to be putting them online and you just need them to look good at maybe a 10"x13" screen equivalent, which any camera with 8 MP or more will do, presuming it will focus at the distance or closeness you need it to. And if you use a tripod, you can ensure no shake on any camera.
The idea about the lighting box stuff is a good one, but I was shooting for eBay for a few years using a point-and-shoot and a built-in flash along with a regular flood or spotlight above or beside the setup, depending on what I was shooting. You can adjust for the kind of lights in the camera, since lights have colors that need balancing, and cameras have a "white balance" setting or will do it automatically.
I have a friend who's been selling coins and art pottery/ceramic dishes, etc., on eBay for over a decade, and was using a Canon digital ELPH until recently when she switched to a Panasonic ZS7; I think it's overkill for her because it has GPS and HD video which she won't use, and the ZS5 is the identical camera minus those 2 things, with a good close-up capability, as well as a decent zoom range, lots of adjustments if you want to use them, and great automatic settings if you'd rather not deal with it. And it's small and light, with flash built-in. Your idea of the FZ35 would work, too - it is a "DSLR-Like" camera (and FZ-100 that I will be buying soon, probably, as it comes close to a DSLR in quality and can do things no DSLR can do, yuk yuk. But overkill for what you need.) You might also look into the Canon PowerShot SX210 IS, the Lumix FS5 or ZS7, the Nikon Coolpix S8100, and the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H55 or HX5V, all cameras in the same general price range, with features like the Lumix FZ35, but smaller. If you want the larger "compact" size, look at the Canon PowerShot SX130 IS, or stick with the Lumix FZ35.
reply to this comment
Let me say that any of the point-and-shoot mid-range and higher-quality point-and-shoots will give you the quality you need for shooting for eBay. You are not going to be making 16"x20" prints for display, you are going to be putting them online and you just need them to look good at maybe a 10"x13" screen equivalent, which any camera with 8 MP or more will do, presuming it will focus at the distance or closeness you need it to. And if you use a tripod, you can ensure no shake on any camera.
The idea about the lighting box stuff is a good one, but I was shooting for eBay for a few years using a point-and-shoot and a built-in flash along with a regular flood or spotlight above or beside the setup, depending on what I was shooting. You can adjust for the kind of lights in the camera, since lights have colors that need balancing, and cameras have a "white balance" setting or will do it automatically.
I have a friend who's been selling coins and art pottery/ceramic dishes, etc., on eBay for over a decade, and was using a Canon digital ELPH until recently when she switched to a Panasonic ZS7; I think it's overkill for her because it has GPS and HD video which she won't use, and the ZS5 is the identical camera minus those 2 things, with a good close-up capability, as well as a decent zoom range, lots of adjustments if you want to use them, and great automatic settings if you'd rather not deal with it. And it's small and light, with flash built-in. Your idea of the FZ35 would work, too - it is a "DSLR-Like" camera (and FZ-100 that I will be buying soon, probably, as it comes close to a DSLR in quality and can do things no DSLR can do, yuk yuk. But overkill for what you need.) You might also look into the Canon PowerShot SX210 IS, the Lumix FS5 or ZS7, the Nikon Coolpix S8100, and the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H55 or HX5V, all cameras in the same general price range, with features like the Lumix FZ35, but smaller. If you want the larger "compact" size, look at the Canon PowerShot SX130 IS, or stick with the Lumix FZ35.
Sami (03/11/2011)
Hello
I heard only nikon and cannon camera are best, rest cannot compete Them. Is it true?
How you would see nikon s8100, is it a good camera as compared to panasonic zs5?
Thanks
reply to this comment
I heard only nikon and cannon camera are best, rest cannot compete Them. Is it true?
How you would see nikon s8100, is it a good camera as compared to panasonic zs5?
Thanks
twitter-44923913 (11/02/2009)
Your recommendation for group of users is helpful. May I suggest splitting camera for "Hobbyist" into "DSLR" (with interchangeable lens) and "DSLR-like" camera (non-interchangeable lens)? My suggestion is based on assumption that hobbyist are highly knowledgeable of cameras and lenses. I recently retired and am coming back after being away from serious photography for 30 years. I am no longer interested in camera with interchangeable lens, hence, the Lumix FZ50 (2006~2007 vintage) would be perfect for me. While I've completed my research and have found the camera that is ideal for my needs, I'm still interested in to see your recommendation.
Thanks,
reply to this comment
Thanks,
eclecticjourney (11/28/2009)
Enrique.....I like your comment. 30 years ago I used to take awesome pictures with my Nikor (spelling?). It was a gift. It had awesome lens with a 1.8 f/stop. My kids love looking at our old pictures and also ask what kind of camera I used. My camera was stolen on a family vacation after about four years of use and I was never able to afford to replace it. Anyway that was back when I spent $30 everytime I took a couple of rolls of film in to be developed and half of the pictures got trashed because someone was looking away of or the picture was not centered.
I have had several digital cameras over the past years and love downloading 300 pictures on my computer and coming up with the top 100 keepers.....the digitial age is awesome. That said I have yet to get picture quality that compares to my Nikor from 30 years ago. I need help deciding what kind of camera to buy.
reply to this comment
I have had several digital cameras over the past years and love downloading 300 pictures on my computer and coming up with the top 100 keepers.....the digitial age is awesome. That said I have yet to get picture quality that compares to my Nikor from 30 years ago. I need help deciding what kind of camera to buy.
