The Best Affordable dSLR Cameras
Last Modified: 03/30/2010
First-time dSLR buyer who doesn't want to spend a lot for "too much" camera? Experienced hobbyist on a budget? If you need a dSLR for under $1,000, we've lined up the best of the bunch below. $1,000 is still a chunk of change, but considering that some dSLRs cost up to five times that much, we consider anything under the four-figure mark "affordable." And remember that even just three or four years ago, a $500 simply did not exist. We've chosen the best dSLRs in each of three sub-categories -- entry-level, consumer, and pro-sumer, divided up by price and feature set. In all fairness, most dSLRs are excellent cameras, we're just picking those that offer a great initial as well as long-term value.
from $449.00
[Read our full Pentax K-x Review]
Best Entry Level dSLR: Pentax K-x
Surprised to see something other than a Canon or Nikon here? Understandable, but we think that the K-x is a better deal than its better-known competitors. It costs about as little as the Canon Rebel XS/1000D or Nikon D3000, but the performance and image quality are a notch above either. It's available in a few different colors, and is one of the most compact dSLRs ever made (rivaled only by some Olympus E-series models), so you'll look pretty stylin' with one hanging from your neck. Pentax is also known for having a dedicated, enthusiastic following -- Pentaxians, they're called -- and their lens mount system supports decades of legacy glass, so there's a sense of loyalty and community around their products. Pentax's user interface isn't quite as intuitive as Canon or Nikon's setups, and the K-x does run on four AA batteries, which is a bummer for some (but a blessing for others). But dollar for dollar, this is our favorite entry-level dSLR, easy enough for first-timers to pick up and shoot away, but with enough depth and control to keep hobbyists happy for several years.
Best Entry Level dSLR: Pentax K-x
Surprised to see something other than a Canon or Nikon here? Understandable, but we think that the K-x is a better deal than its better-known competitors. It costs about as little as the Canon Rebel XS/1000D or Nikon D3000, but the performance and image quality are a notch above either. It's available in a few different colors, and is one of the most compact dSLRs ever made (rivaled only by some Olympus E-series models), so you'll look pretty stylin' with one hanging from your neck. Pentax is also known for having a dedicated, enthusiastic following -- Pentaxians, they're called -- and their lens mount system supports decades of legacy glass, so there's a sense of loyalty and community around their products. Pentax's user interface isn't quite as intuitive as Canon or Nikon's setups, and the K-x does run on four AA batteries, which is a bummer for some (but a blessing for others). But dollar for dollar, this is our favorite entry-level dSLR, easy enough for first-timers to pick up and shoot away, but with enough depth and control to keep hobbyists happy for several years.
[Read our full Nikon D5000 Review]
Best Consumer dSLR: Nikon D5000
This category was a tossup between the D5000 and the Canon Rebel T1i. Both shoot such similarly bright and crisp images that it's difficult to discern which camera took which photos. Both lock-on to targets and shoot at about the same snappy speed. Both feature 720p HD video. Both come with a similar 18-55mm kit lens. Both are well made. The T1i is stronger in a few subtle ways (a brighter viewfinder and wider dioptic adjustment range, for example), but since the D5000 costs as much as $100 less, we're going with the Nikon here. A "consumer" level camera like this offers more oomph over an entry-level model like, say, the D3000: movie mode (720p HD at that), HDMI output, more powerful flash, Live View mode, and an articulating LCD monitor to name a few. Most importantly, budding hobbyists have room to grow with a camera like this.
Best Consumer dSLR: Nikon D5000
This category was a tossup between the D5000 and the Canon Rebel T1i. Both shoot such similarly bright and crisp images that it's difficult to discern which camera took which photos. Both lock-on to targets and shoot at about the same snappy speed. Both feature 720p HD video. Both come with a similar 18-55mm kit lens. Both are well made. The T1i is stronger in a few subtle ways (a brighter viewfinder and wider dioptic adjustment range, for example), but since the D5000 costs as much as $100 less, we're going with the Nikon here. A "consumer" level camera like this offers more oomph over an entry-level model like, say, the D3000: movie mode (720p HD at that), HDMI output, more powerful flash, Live View mode, and an articulating LCD monitor to name a few. Most importantly, budding hobbyists have room to grow with a camera like this.
Best "Pro-Sumer" dSLR: Canon Rebel T2i
"This just came out," you say. "How can it be the best of anything?" For one thing, the "pro-sumer" (somewhere between a professional and mid-range consumer model) category spills way beyond the $1,000 mark, so our choices were limited. Secondly, remember how we said one paragraph ago that T1i was totally worthy of the the best consumer dSLR award, but it cost a bit too much? Well, Canon crammed a slew of high-end features into roughly the same package for just a few extra bills. The T2i has the very same 18-megapixel CMOS sensor and 1080p HD video (in 30, 25, and 24 frames per second) as the considerably costlier EOS 7D. Early reviews indicate that the images are sharper than the T1i, and the video is legitimately on par with the 7D. Now that's a deal.
"This just came out," you say. "How can it be the best of anything?" For one thing, the "pro-sumer" (somewhere between a professional and mid-range consumer model) category spills way beyond the $1,000 mark, so our choices were limited. Secondly, remember how we said one paragraph ago that T1i was totally worthy of the the best consumer dSLR award, but it cost a bit too much? Well, Canon crammed a slew of high-end features into roughly the same package for just a few extra bills. The T2i has the very same 18-megapixel CMOS sensor and 1080p HD video (in 30, 25, and 24 frames per second) as the considerably costlier EOS 7D. Early reviews indicate that the images are sharper than the T1i, and the video is legitimately on par with the 7D. Now that's a deal.
The Best Affordable dSLR Cameras Comments & Questions (write your own!)
Nikon D70 or Canon EOS 50D (Lenny Sutsakhan — 03/29/2010)
I am comparing 2 DSLR, Nikon D90 and Canon EOS 50D. For the moment, it is a toss up as I am reading various reviews rating the performance of the two cameras.
I have an AF Nikkor - 85mm 1:1.8D. I am NOT sure whether this old lens type is compatible or can be utilized with Nikon D70. This could be a deciding factor if I can utilize this lens. I am welcoming your suggestions. Thank you, Lenny (3/28/10)
reply to this comment
I have an AF Nikkor - 85mm 1:1.8D. I am NOT sure whether this old lens type is compatible or can be utilized with Nikon D70. This could be a deciding factor if I can utilize this lens. I am welcoming your suggestions. Thank you, Lenny (3/28/10)
by James DeRuvo (03/30/2010)
Indeed it is, albeit on manual only probably. But that's the beauty of Nikon it's legacy of fantastic lenses that can still be used on new bodies. Stay in the family, I say.
reply to this comment
Minolta Lenses (Arnie Colon — 04/04/2010)
I have a camera bag full of Minolta Maxxum lenses. Is any DSLR preferable for use with my old Minolta glass? Are there pitfalls for which I should be aware?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (04/07/2010)
Sony's Alpha line is a redesigned and improved Minolta that uses the same lens mount. The A900 also shoots HD video, which is cool. That's your ticket, Arnie.
reply to this comment
Minolta Maxxum to DSLR (Arnie Colon — 04/09/2010)
Thank you for your reply to my query. Of course, the Sony A900 is the answer to any maiden's prayer, but hopelessly beyond my pauperish budget. The Pentax K-X is probably closer to reality. Take my Maxxum lenses down to my neighborhood Ritz and fiddle around? If you have any clues, or advice, given my embarrassing financial condition, please jump in!
reply to this comment
Comparable DSLR v Olympus C750 (Lesley Dale — 04/06/2010)
I am currently using an Olympus c750 and like all the features especially the zoom and get annoyed with the shutter delay, the size is also great as it can fit in a handbag. I would like something with inbuilt GPS, maybe wishful thinking and at least as many features and zoom. As I have 7 XD cards I was thinking to go with Olympus again but could easily be swayed to another brand. I also have a couple of K-mount (I think) lenses from a Ricoh SLR could you tell me if any of these can be used on any DSLR's.Thank you
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (04/07/2010)
It's a common problem with point and shoot cameras. But there are ways to combat it.
1. Prefocus. Hold down the shutter half way to get a prefocus of the image you're shooting. When it changes, prefocus again. This will speed up your camera's performance during picture taking since it won't have to autofocus before it shoots the shot.
2. Use faster SD cards. Yes, there are faster cards and it does make a difference in writing the image file to the card. This is especially key if you're taking multiple or burst images.
3. Fresher batteries. Use alkalines at least. But I recommend using high energy batteries designed for digital photography. Varta is a good brand. They are usually sold in camera shops, are long lasting (because they are sold in small quantities) put out alot of energy.
4. Pan with the action. You can create some pretty cool shots by panning with your shot, focusing on your subject. This will create the effect of your subject in sharp contrast to the blurry background.
6. Stick with 100-400 ISO. Going higher will cause more noise/grain in your shots, particularly in darker settings.
Doing these, particularly prefocusing and panning with the action will cut your shutter lag by as much as 80%.
K Mounts points you to Pentax. They should work, although probably on manual.
reply to this comment
It's a common problem with point and shoot cameras. But there are ways to combat it.
1. Prefocus. Hold down the shutter half way to get a prefocus of the image you're shooting. When it changes, prefocus again. This will speed up your camera's performance during picture taking since it won't have to autofocus before it shoots the shot.
2. Use faster SD cards. Yes, there are faster cards and it does make a difference in writing the image file to the card. This is especially key if you're taking multiple or burst images.
3. Fresher batteries. Use alkalines at least. But I recommend using high energy batteries designed for digital photography. Varta is a good brand. They are usually sold in camera shops, are long lasting (because they are sold in small quantities) put out alot of energy.
4. Pan with the action. You can create some pretty cool shots by panning with your shot, focusing on your subject. This will create the effect of your subject in sharp contrast to the blurry background.
6. Stick with 100-400 ISO. Going higher will cause more noise/grain in your shots, particularly in darker settings.
Doing these, particularly prefocusing and panning with the action will cut your shutter lag by as much as 80%.
K Mounts points you to Pentax. They should work, although probably on manual.
DSLR w Video Capabilities, Easy to use, Not too bulky (Karisa — 04/08/2010)
I would like a DSLR - my husband has a Nikon and all the lenses. I am not as "pro-like." We are having triplets so I want something that will be fast to grab the moments and offer an easy to use video camera. After doing research, I am stuck between Nikon D90, Canon 550D, Canon 7D, or Lumix GH1 - thoughts? Suggestions?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (04/08/2010)
I'd stay in the family, chiefly because you can use your husband's lenses no matter how old they are. You go outside that and you're spending money you don't really need to. Unless your hubby doesn't want to share that is, then I'd suggest the 7D. But go with the D90 and enjoy the HD video to boot.
reply to this comment
priority in selection (troydon — 04/08/2010)
by troydon scurville
which would be better in terms of cost & performance nikon d90 or canon 50d or the canon 550d
reply to this comment
which would be better in terms of cost & performance nikon d90 or canon 50d or the canon 550d
Liam McCabe (04/08/2010)
The 550d would be the top-performing camera of that bunch. The D90 is also a great option.
reply to this comment
NIKON VS CANON (GB MIAMI — 04/14/2010)
I Have used both, and anyone who tells you one brand is better than the other does not know photography, once you step to the D90 level of above of the nikons and the d50 or above of the canon, there is NOTHING that one camera wont do for photos over the other. I stayes with nikon and sold all of canon because the lenses that i needed were better suited by nikon, dont chase cameras, chase lenses, a good lens will actually go up in price after time. Go to the store and actually hold both and see how they feel. Nikon tends to place more options on the outside while canon at this level will place options in the menus. To actually start off, why not purchased used from ebay a D70 or rebel for 200 dollars and spend the other 700 on a great pair of lenses, the pictures will actually come out better.
reply to this comment
asmar fahad (04/11/2010)
After point and shoot I m going to take a dslr...i wanna be serious with photography. I found some models such as rebel t1i, rebel t2i and nikon d5000...
Please help me to select one... I need a all-roundar... So waiting for u.
reply to this comment
Please help me to select one... I need a all-roundar... So waiting for u.
by James DeRuvo (04/14/2010)
The T2i is a great way to go for an entry level DSLR. It not only gives you the basic set, but also HD video. Save money with an entry level body and invest it in better quality lenses. Then get a better body down the road.
reply to this comment
D90 VS 550D..... (orionBANGLA — 04/12/2010)
NIKON D90 OR CANON 550D?????
WHICH ONE IS PERFECT TO START??
reply to this comment
WHICH ONE IS PERFECT TO START??
by James DeRuvo (04/14/2010)
Slip a coin. They're both outstanding cameras.
reply to this comment
dslr to start (gb Miami — 04/14/2010)
you can start with either one, keep in mind that once you buy one brand you most likely stick with it for a long time. nikon is a lens company that makes cameras while canon is the opposite. both are great, keep in mind that canon advertises more so don't give in to the hype. another reason I switched to nikon is because their cheap 100 to 150 dollar lens options are far better suited to my starting need for example nikon 18-55 lens with VR and 55-200 with VR blows away anything canon offers at this price range. read Ken Rockwell website and please reas his sections on aperture and how to compose pictures, it's not about the camera.. if you don't care about the video part of the camera and are looking for pics only then it does not matter, "important" canon as a marketing ploy tweaks their internal settings to make the rebel colors look brighter, nikon tries to give you a more raw look to give you the power of tweaking your pics to your liking, all of these can be done in Photoshop later.
reply to this comment
NIKON VS CANON (GB MIAMI — 04/14/2010)
I Have used both, and anyone who tells you one brand is better than the other does not know photography, once you step to the D90 level of above of the nikons and the d50 or above of the canon, there is NOTHING that one camera wont do for photos over the other. I stayes with nikon and sold all of canon because the lenses that i needed were better suited by nikon, dont chase cameras, chase lenses, a good lens will actually go up in price after time. Go to the store and actually hold both and see how they feel. Nikon tends to place more options on the outside while canon at this level will place options in the menus. To actually start off, why not purchased used from ebay a D70 or rebel for 200 dollars and spend the other 700 on a great pair of lenses, the pictures will actually come out better.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (04/14/2010)
Agreed!
reply to this comment
linda (04/15/2010)
what is the difference between the nikon d60 and the 3000 and 5000 series
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (04/15/2010)
The 3000 and 5000 series are entry level DSLRs.
reply to this comment
Linda McCreary (04/20/2010)
What does dSLR stand for??
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (04/22/2010)
Digital Single Lens Reflex. For more information, check out wiki at - en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digit...
reply to this comment
Lane Doiron (04/21/2010)
I am in the market for a DSLR camera...comparing several and need a recommendation. The Canon T2i, the Nikon D90 or Pentax KX...OR have I left out one that would be better than these listed?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (04/22/2010)
I remember my first SLR ... a Pentax. It was great. But really, the two top cameras are Canon and Nikon. And both the T2i and D90 have HD video. The Nikon does have the edge with legacy lens support (you can use any Nikkor lens for the last 50 years), but I think the T2i has a better HD video.
reply to this comment
Carol (04/27/2010)
Any comments or suggestions on entry level DSLR? I am comparing the Nikon d5000 & Olympus E620 on advice from a 'sales person'. The sales pitch is that Olympus has the better lenses. Are they correct?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (04/29/2010)
Nikon, hands down. And I can tell you from being the "sales person" that he's steering you towards Olympus because he probably gets a better commission/spiff on it. There's no way a Zuiko lens is better than a Nikkor. NO WAY. And that he chose to omit Canon is telling. He probably gets NO spiff on that.
The real choice, is the Canon T21 and the 5000D. The T2i has HD video though ... quite tempting.
reply to this comment
The real choice, is the Canon T21 and the 5000D. The T2i has HD video though ... quite tempting.
camera comparison (Ron Stupka — 04/28/2010)
how does the sony A220/a230 compare toyour recommended picks
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (04/29/2010)
It's okay. It's really just a redesigned Minolta. I'd prefer Canon and Nikon.
reply to this comment
Kay (05/03/2010)
I have a slew of old SLR Olympus lenses. Is there a dSLR that will use these old lenses? I am looking at Nikon D90, D5000 or the Canon T2i/550D
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (05/03/2010)
None of those will without an adapter which will 1) slow down the lens and b) cause clarity issues and 3) you'll only use on manual. You can go with Olympus DSLRs to keep it in the family. But you're right to look at the Nikon and Canon brands.
Why not just sell them on eBay and apply the cash to what you really want?
reply to this comment
Why not just sell them on eBay and apply the cash to what you really want?
seeking advice from those who know more (Babs Noelle — 05/05/2010)
I have a newbie question. I have a great light set-up for photographing jewelry, but it's time for me to switch to a dSLR with autofocus. Any suggestions for camera as pertains specifically to such macro-photography? I will NOT be taking photos professionally (for publication), but DO want slick photos for the upcoming ecommerce component of my website.
If you check out my website, you'll know that my standards are high, even for web photos. But the photos WILL be done by a non-pro, with hopefully an easily replicated setup every time.
So much thanks in advance,
Babs Noelle
www.alarajewelry.com
reply to this comment
If you check out my website, you'll know that my standards are high, even for web photos. But the photos WILL be done by a non-pro, with hopefully an easily replicated setup every time.
So much thanks in advance,
Babs Noelle
www.alarajewelry.com
by James DeRuvo (05/06/2010)
The Canon T2i is a good solid entry level DSLR which will enable you to do the job.
reply to this comment
WHICH LENS (TROYDON SCURVILLE — 05/11/2010)
Please help me decide - With the canon D50 Digital SLR which lens is best suitable 1) Canon EF -S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS) 2)Canon EF 24-85mm f3.5-4.5 USM or 3)Canon EF 28-105mm.f/3.5-4.5 II USM. I would mainly be covering weddings & functions & also like to take good portraits.Can you also tell me if having the NORMAL Canon 50mm f/1.8 II will be useful as i have lots if experience working on the normal 500 mm lens in film format.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (05/13/2010)
I like the 28-105. Great portrait options there. Also, photographers seem to love that 50mm. I don't care for it, but it's a personal bias.
reply to this comment
lens choice (TROYDON SCURVILLE — 05/13/2010)
Is this also good for photographing groups & the crowds in the function , please reply
reply to this comment
Looking for a DSLR (Raj — 06/28/2010)
Hi James,
I extensively use an old Canon Powershot point & shoot camera and often have been handicapped at not being able to click at night/indoors or long shots. I am looking at a DSLR (XS, XSi or D5000) that I can use as a base to upgrade later on once I get a hang of DSLR. I dont mind spending relatively more (upto $850 say even for a T2i) as long as it is value for money in the long run. I own a Sony Handicam and hence donot need DSLR for the video.
Could you advise pls..
Raj
reply to this comment
I extensively use an old Canon Powershot point & shoot camera and often have been handicapped at not being able to click at night/indoors or long shots. I am looking at a DSLR (XS, XSi or D5000) that I can use as a base to upgrade later on once I get a hang of DSLR. I dont mind spending relatively more (upto $850 say even for a T2i) as long as it is value for money in the long run. I own a Sony Handicam and hence donot need DSLR for the video.
Could you advise pls..
Raj
WHICH CAMERA (TROYDON SCURVILLE — 05/11/2010)
Please help me decide which camera will be better 1)canon 50D or 2)nikon D90 to start my journey into the digital SLR FOR THE FIRST TIME
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (05/11/2010)
I've heard more good things about the D90 than the 50D, to be honest. You should be happy with either, but I hear lots of good things about the D90.
reply to this comment
Professional DSLR (Aru — 05/12/2010)
I lost my d50,i'm looking to buy a new DSLR professional level but don't wnat to spend more than $2000 what is the best available in market?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (05/14/2010)
The Canon 7D is your best bet for the money.
reply to this comment
Malar (05/12/2010)
I'm, looking for a good professional DSLR.I don't want to pay more for HD video.I want a good camera just for photo.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (05/14/2010)
Depends on your budget. UNder $2K, I'd go with the Canon 7D.
reply to this comment
buying camera thru e-bay (TROYDON SCURVILLE — 05/13/2010)
Is it safe to make cameras purchases on e-bay,The bundle they offer seem great,how does it work, & would they ship it to India where I STAY -- PLEASE help me with this information
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (05/14/2010)
First thing is to make sure you pay attention to the seller's feedback ratings. And also remember that if it sounds too good to be true, it probably is. SHipping to India will also be pretty pricey.
reply to this comment
more specific please (TROYDON SCURVILLE — 05/14/2010)
some more clarification on the e-bay purchasing of cameras please
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (05/14/2010)
reply to this comment
shop.ebay.in (Jamil Sayed — 06/26/2010)
In India, u may purchase safely in shop.ebay.in. Before placing your order, u should read the sellers feedback, the comments from other purchasers. Never pay through bank transfer. Always pay through "paypaisa" through credit/debit card.
reply to this comment
Don't discount Zuiko lenses or Oly bang-for-buck! Zuikos are HIGH quality... (Jeff — 05/20/2010)
Obviously you've never actually compared a zuiko lens to a nikkor or you'd NEVER have thrown out such a baseless claim.
Regarding simple KIT lenses, the zuikos are fantastic- every bit the equal or superior to comparable nikon kits. As to higher end lenses (in case you're interested) the Zuiko 35-100 f2.0 SPANKS other lenses, the Zuiko 50 f2 is amazing, the 7-14mm, 11-22, 90-250 f2.8 and 300 f2.0 are also among the best in existence. Oh yes, the 12-60 is fantastic (and the 14-54 is no slouch either).
If you were going to make a VALID argument, you should have said "the best zuiko lenses are a bit pricey" or "Olympus bodies don't yet let you see the full quality of the lenses yet" and left it at that.
Then again, if you NEED a 70-200 or 600mm equivalent f2 (brightness- not DOF) then only ONE options exists.
Frankly, there are many other reasons to choose one brand over another that are legitimate- please do some homework to learn about those (e.g. the ultimate in low light performance is the D3s, Canikon accessories are easy to find, Pentax has lovely legacy primes, etc.).
reply to this comment
Regarding simple KIT lenses, the zuikos are fantastic- every bit the equal or superior to comparable nikon kits. As to higher end lenses (in case you're interested) the Zuiko 35-100 f2.0 SPANKS other lenses, the Zuiko 50 f2 is amazing, the 7-14mm, 11-22, 90-250 f2.8 and 300 f2.0 are also among the best in existence. Oh yes, the 12-60 is fantastic (and the 14-54 is no slouch either).
If you were going to make a VALID argument, you should have said "the best zuiko lenses are a bit pricey" or "Olympus bodies don't yet let you see the full quality of the lenses yet" and left it at that.
Then again, if you NEED a 70-200 or 600mm equivalent f2 (brightness- not DOF) then only ONE options exists.
Frankly, there are many other reasons to choose one brand over another that are legitimate- please do some homework to learn about those (e.g. the ultimate in low light performance is the D3s, Canikon accessories are easy to find, Pentax has lovely legacy primes, etc.).
by James DeRuvo (05/21/2010)
You can believe that. Fine. But looking at what the pros use, few stray from the Nikon or Canon lines.
And just because Nikkors are recommended over Olympus, doesn't mean Zuikos are bad lenses. But there's a reason why the pros choose Canon or Nikon.
reply to this comment
And just because Nikkors are recommended over Olympus, doesn't mean Zuikos are bad lenses. But there's a reason why the pros choose Canon or Nikon.
response directed at a singular comment of 4/29... (Jeff — 05/21/2010)
James,
It appears that my comments were not directly associated to the comments of yours as I was intending.
I was directly responding to your claim that "no way is a zuiko [lens] better than a nikkor" which was part of your response to a beginner looking at (evidently) entry-level dSLRs.
Sorry, I just couldn't let that categorical lens comment stand unchallenged (yes, I think the Oly BODIES are a bit behind the times in regards to ISO performance, FPS and video).
I do agree that Canon/Nikon have some killer camera bodies and for most people they offer a more advisable path (easier to find/buy/rent lenses & accessories, established upgrade path, greater likelihood of being able to share/swap equipment/advice with others as they're most likely to have C&N kit, etc).
Additionally, the Olympus offerings (non-micro) do NOT have video capabilities.
That being said, if someone I know is contemplating a Nikon D3000, I'd definitely steer them towards something like a E-620 if it looked like a 2-lens kit was all they'd ever use because of the bang-for-the-buck (swivel screen, live view, in body stabilization, mirror lock-up, dustbuster, etc.) however, if they could afford to spend a few hundred more $ or potentially would want to upgrade in the future - without a doubt, I'd steer them to various Canon or Nikon offerings. While I'm impressed with the K-x's ISO performance but Pentax ends up being a niche product like Olympus (great legacy glass, no FF upgrade path, slow AF, poor JPG rendering, etc) and I rarely recommend going Pentax unless someone has loads of old (higher quality) Pentax glass (I still use some on my Oly bodies via adapter).
Cheers.
reply to this comment
It appears that my comments were not directly associated to the comments of yours as I was intending.
I was directly responding to your claim that "no way is a zuiko [lens] better than a nikkor" which was part of your response to a beginner looking at (evidently) entry-level dSLRs.
Sorry, I just couldn't let that categorical lens comment stand unchallenged (yes, I think the Oly BODIES are a bit behind the times in regards to ISO performance, FPS and video).
I do agree that Canon/Nikon have some killer camera bodies and for most people they offer a more advisable path (easier to find/buy/rent lenses & accessories, established upgrade path, greater likelihood of being able to share/swap equipment/advice with others as they're most likely to have C&N kit, etc).
Additionally, the Olympus offerings (non-micro) do NOT have video capabilities.
That being said, if someone I know is contemplating a Nikon D3000, I'd definitely steer them towards something like a E-620 if it looked like a 2-lens kit was all they'd ever use because of the bang-for-the-buck (swivel screen, live view, in body stabilization, mirror lock-up, dustbuster, etc.) however, if they could afford to spend a few hundred more $ or potentially would want to upgrade in the future - without a doubt, I'd steer them to various Canon or Nikon offerings. While I'm impressed with the K-x's ISO performance but Pentax ends up being a niche product like Olympus (great legacy glass, no FF upgrade path, slow AF, poor JPG rendering, etc) and I rarely recommend going Pentax unless someone has loads of old (higher quality) Pentax glass (I still use some on my Oly bodies via adapter).
Cheers.
Lenses (Chandler — 05/25/2010)
I have a Film DSL cannon A1 with a cannon 50mm 1.4 lens
Now its way past due for a DSLR. Most of my photograpy will be standard distance and not using telephotos. I like the cannon T2 Rebel 18 Megpxls. However I hear the poor reviews on Cannons 50 mm 1.4 lens on auto settings. I thought fast low light would require a 1.4 lens. Should I consider a Nicon camera and there 50 mm 1.4 Lens?
reply to this comment
Now its way past due for a DSLR. Most of my photograpy will be standard distance and not using telephotos. I like the cannon T2 Rebel 18 Megpxls. However I hear the poor reviews on Cannons 50 mm 1.4 lens on auto settings. I thought fast low light would require a 1.4 lens. Should I consider a Nicon camera and there 50 mm 1.4 Lens?
by James DeRuvo (05/26/2010)
I'd get a zoom lens. No matter what brand you get. Both have great DSLR lines. But a 50mm just isn't that flexible for my liking.
reply to this comment
lenses (Chandler — 05/26/2010)
James thanks for your commentv on the Lens. However low light fast (1.4) was my priority asn a zoom lens dosnt fit my needs. I don't require the versitility of a zoom.
I shoot at short distances in low level light.
Im curious are there zooms for fast low lever light like the 1.4? Please note I mostly shoot on Auto.
reply to this comment
I shoot at short distances in low level light.
Im curious are there zooms for fast low lever light like the 1.4? Please note I mostly shoot on Auto.
low light zooms (TJ — 06/11/2010)
From my experience it depends on what subjects you're shooting. F/1.4 is extraordinarily difficult to focus with as your depth of field at maximum aperture is brutally thin, especially if you're shooting faces. If you're shooting objects that aren't in motion or for which you can take multiple exposures and then stack focus, F/1.4 primes are great value.
There are really no viable zooms below f/2.8 with the exception being some Olympus glass. Creating a lens with an aperture that large that is constant throughout the lens is very difficult.
Again, it depends on your application, as with anything, but the Canon 50mm f/1.8 is a phenomenal lens, will run you about $100 and doubles as a very able macro lens in addition to its sharpness. Is is the best lens in the world? no, but there's simply no better value.
reply to this comment
There are really no viable zooms below f/2.8 with the exception being some Olympus glass. Creating a lens with an aperture that large that is constant throughout the lens is very difficult.
Again, it depends on your application, as with anything, but the Canon 50mm f/1.8 is a phenomenal lens, will run you about $100 and doubles as a very able macro lens in addition to its sharpness. Is is the best lens in the world? no, but there's simply no better value.
Nikon D80 vs D3000 (Peg Chaisson — 05/26/2010)
I have a Nikon D80 and am considering a D3000 (or 5000). Would this be an upgrade or are they very similar. I'm not interested in the video feature. Thank you. PC
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (05/27/2010)
They're essentially the same cameras. If you're not interested in the video feature, it's not much of an upgrade, certainly not worth spending the money for, IMHO.
reply to this comment
Lens use (Ron — 06/02/2010)
Based on your comment, "don't chase the camera body, chase the lens." I have 2 Minolta AF lens; Minolta Maxxum AF 28-80, and, Minolta Maxxum AF 70-210. Am wanting to get a quality DSLR that will accept my lens for a reasonable price. I would be considered a beginner/amature photographer wanting to upgrade from my 35mm SLR Minolta. Any good suggestions??
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (06/03/2010)
Well, you only have one choice, and that's the Sony Alpha series. Sony bought Minolta's camera business when they dropped out of the industry. I'd recommend the Alpha 900 as it'll also shoot in HD video. But it all depends on your budget.
reply to this comment
minolta lenses (T.J. Donegan — 06/11/2010)
If your cameras will mount on an Alpha series camera, you may want to wait for the NEX-3 or NEX-5 cameras which are coming out next month from Sony. They will utilize a new mount that is different from your minolta lenses, but the cameras sport a D-SLR sized sensor in a micro four/thirds body and will mount alpha lenses through the use of a $199 adapter.
The cameras will retail right around the $550-650 mark, so I'm not sure if that fits your needs price-wise. If that's a bit too much including the adapter you can opt for the A230 or A330 for entry-level prices that are falling fast as Sony's new line of cameras will begin to trickle out this Summer.
reply to this comment
The cameras will retail right around the $550-650 mark, so I'm not sure if that fits your needs price-wise. If that's a bit too much including the adapter you can opt for the A230 or A330 for entry-level prices that are falling fast as Sony's new line of cameras will begin to trickle out this Summer.
Len Z (06/07/2010)
You should keep silent if you don't know the answer. D series lenses work fine, you just need to keep them set to minimum aperture to have full function.
reply to this comment
Canon SLR successor suggestions (CAphotoGUY — 06/12/2010)
I own 2 ancient Canon AE-1 SLR's in perfect condition with assorted lenses (I am the original purchaser; one of them I bought for my parents who since gave it back nearly unused). I have been hoping I could do something productive with them or there might be some kind of digital retrofit kit. Any suggestions?
Otherwise I am looking for an entry dSLR. Are these lenses still usable or do I need to start over.
I'm open to trying a good used model. I like nature telephoto and human photography.
Thanks!
reply to this comment
Otherwise I am looking for an entry dSLR. Are these lenses still usable or do I need to start over.
I'm open to trying a good used model. I like nature telephoto and human photography.
Thanks!
by James DeRuvo (06/16/2010)
Unfortuantely, now. The Canon DSLRs use an EF style lens which can't be used with the old F style lens of the AE1. You're best bet would be to list them on eBay and apply the cash you make towards the lenses you buy with that Canon T2i.
reply to this comment
Amy Long (06/12/2010)
Nikon D5000 is my dream camera. The ease of use and photo quality are wonderful.
reply to this comment
joseph kennedy (06/14/2010)
i think that i want to buy from thunder cameras a canon t2i package with a 17-85mm f/4-5.6 is usm autofocus lens and a 70-200mm f/2.8l usm autofocus lenscost is $2o59 after upgrading battery and chip shipping cost is $2574 he offered to trade "up" to a tamron 28-70 f/2.8 dg and a 70 200 f/2.8 di ld macro af lensis the tamron lens as good as canon? is thunder a good place to buy? i have read that canon is the best i am not sure what to do
reply to this comment
Chris Weigl (06/16/2010)
I don't know thunder personally so I can't help you there, but it seems like they're doing something screwy there. The Canon 70-200 is definitely a better lens than the Tamron due to its better focus motor. It's also a far more expensive lens so don't take his "deal". The 28-70 2.8 is a great lens and probably better than the 17-85, but what he doesn't tell you is that you lose some serious wide angle using that lens on a t2i. You would be much happier with the 17-85 despite it's slower speed. Just to set the record straight, Canon is not the "best". Every manufacturer excels in some areas and not in others, none are best for everything.
reply to this comment
Unique camera usage (James — 06/19/2010)
I am looking for a dslr and lens combination to take close up pictures in horses mouths. (i am a veterinarian) Lighting can be an issue as these cameras always have the flash too far from the lens for me to get the lens and the flash in the mouth at the same time. Is there a ring flash and entry or pro level performence camera lens combination that anyone can sugest? This lens needs to be pretty durable/cleanable too.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (06/19/2010)
A ring flash is a good option. Search Amazon and you'll find several options. For your camera setup, I'd recommend the Canon T2i and either the 50mm macro or the various wide angle options which have the same macro feature.
reply to this comment
Unique camera usage (James — 06/19/2010)
I am looking for a dslr and lens combination to take close up pictures in horses mouths. (i am a veterinarian) Lighting can be an issue as these cameras always have the flash too far from the lens for me to get the lens and the flash in the mouth at the same time. Is there a ring flash and entry or pro level performence camera lens combination that anyone can sugest? This lens needs to be pretty durable/cleanable too.
reply to this comment
Fiona (06/23/2010)
I am looking to buy a new camera as an upgrade to my old Canon Pro1. I love taking macro photos but am also wanting a good zoom option as well. I am looking at either Nikon or Canon and spending up to 2000. There are an amazing amount of options but I am very confused, any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (06/24/2010)
I think the Canon 7D is a great compromise of picture quality and price. It gives you about 80% of what the 5D Mk. II gives you, but at nearly half the price.
reply to this comment
Canon EOS 400D (Katie Margetts — 06/24/2010)
Hey, I'm thinking about purchasing a second hand Canon EOS 400D. Any comments, I have never owned an SLR camera and want to get into taking better pictures but am not sure if I should get something new rather than second hand. Reviews seem to be positive but most of them are from 2008/09.
Secondly, can someone help me out with choosing an inexpensive but good underwater camera and housing as I need one for my next holiday.
Thank you :-)
reply to this comment
Secondly, can someone help me out with choosing an inexpensive but good underwater camera and housing as I need one for my next holiday.
Thank you :-)
by James DeRuvo (06/24/2010)
The XTi was a great camera in it's day. I guess it depends on how much you can get it for. Thing is, the new T2i can do some much more including HD video. It may be worth saving for a few extra months and going new. But if it's in good condition and the price is right, it'll serve you well as an entry level DSLR.
As for underwater housings, et al - you can't beat Ikelite.
reply to this comment
As for underwater housings, et al - you can't beat Ikelite.
A710IS or needing more? (Betty — 06/24/2010)
I am very amateur in photo taking, but have a Cannon A710IS. I miss a lot of good pictures due to a slow shutter speed. What should I be looking at getting into or am I missins something about this camera?
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (06/24/2010)
A camera like that will always have a long shutter lag, no way around it. You can make it a bit quicker by 'pre-focusing' -- hold the shutter halfway down so that it auto-focuses before you actually try to take the picture. That should help.
reply to this comment
Any recommendations (Betty — 06/26/2010)
To replace my Canon A710IS with something that will have a faster shutter and quicker recovery from using the flash, what should I look at camera wise. I wouldn't want to spend more than $500. I like to take photos of nature, animals and will soon become a grandma so will be taking pics of a new little one...
reply to this comment
First dslr camera (Fiona — 06/24/2010)
Thanks James. I have been looking at this camera and it comes with a Canon EF 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS lens. For what I want I am going to need a macro lens also. An earlier comment indicated that old Nikon lenses will fit new Nikons... is this true and if so would this be a cheaper option? I am not sure I can justify another 600 for a macro lens.
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (06/25/2010)
Legacy lens support is one of the best features about Nikon, so yes, you can use your old Nikon lenses.
reply to this comment
shop.ebay.in (Jamil Sayed — 06/26/2010)
In India, u may purchase safely in shop.ebay.in. Before placing your order, u should read the sellers feedback, the comments from other purchasers. Never pay through bank transfer. Always pay through "paypaisa" through credit/debit card.
reply to this comment
aari (06/29/2010)
sorry for asking question out of box.
i want to buy Fuji FinePix S1600...
it's ok??can all of you give opinion...
reply to this comment
i want to buy Fuji FinePix S1600...
it's ok??can all of you give opinion...
Canon or Nikon DSLR? and is the quality of the images really going to be that much better? ( — 06/29/2010)
I currently have a Canon AE1 Programmable with a 28-105? zoom lense which also has a MACRO feature. I LOVE this camera and the quality of photos that I have had over the years, and the ability to take along 1 lense wherever I go. I use it for travel, flowers, people, etc. The reason that I am considering changing to a DSLR, is that I would like to not have to use a flash as much as digital seems to use the avaialble light much better than film. I am also told that when you take your memory card in for prints, that you will get better photos. I usually only print at 4x6. Is that true, will I notice a signifcant difference? Also I am able to look through a viewfinder with my existing Canon, which the Point and Shoots don't have, and I have a hard time in outdoor situations. I want to get a DSLR that has these choices avaialable. Do you think Canon or Nikon and what models and lenses do you recommend. Thanks!!! Laura
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (06/29/2010)
I don't think that's necessarily true. Low light is low light and it largely depends on how fast your lens is, what ISO you're using, etc. In a DSLR, if you're underexposed, you get noise. In film, you get grain. Same concept though.
As for which one, either makes great cameras and great lenses. Nikon has an advantage in that in manual you can use lenses dating back nearly 6 decades. But right now, my money is on Canon. Take a look at the T2i and the 7D, depending on your budget.
One thing though, you won't be able to use those old Canon lenses though as Canon changed their lens mounts when autofocus came back in the mid eighties.
reply to this comment
As for which one, either makes great cameras and great lenses. Nikon has an advantage in that in manual you can use lenses dating back nearly 6 decades. But right now, my money is on Canon. Take a look at the T2i and the 7D, depending on your budget.
One thing though, you won't be able to use those old Canon lenses though as Canon changed their lens mounts when autofocus came back in the mid eighties.
A bit more info I could use please ( — 06/29/2010)
Okay, so my current lense is a Canon Zoom Lens FD 35-105 1:3.5 (is this terminolgy the speed?) with a Macro Feature. If I am looking for a lense in Nikon or Canon and want to be able to get less Noise (or to use more available light), what kind of a lense would I be looking for?
And thanks for your great and quick response.
reply to this comment
And thanks for your great and quick response.
Graphic Designer..needing help with DSLR camera options between Nikon and Canon (jay — 06/29/2010)
Hello Every1 I'm a graphic designer who has an eye for photography. I dont want a beginners camera, I just want one thatll last for a while and wanted to choose between NIKON or CANON. I still dont know which series of either company to purchase, but i would aslo like to stay in the range of $800 or less. I also wanted versatility and options with different lenses.
ive read many of the feedbacks but every1 keeps saying for beginers get this camera and profess. get another. I just want i guess the pro camera to be able to walk before i crawl (save some money and time basically). PLEASE HELP ME OUT thanks.
reply to this comment
ive read many of the feedbacks but every1 keeps saying for beginers get this camera and profess. get another. I just want i guess the pro camera to be able to walk before i crawl (save some money and time basically). PLEASE HELP ME OUT thanks.
by James DeRuvo (06/29/2010)
Well for a DSLR, you'll be hard pressed to get under $1000 with the lens. I'd recommend saving for a few months longer and getting the Canon T2i with a good 28-105, or there abouts, zoom lens. Cost is around $1100.
For your price point, you may want to look on clearance or used for a Canon XSi.
reply to this comment
For your price point, you may want to look on clearance or used for a Canon XSi.
Pentax k-x (wksoh — 07/01/2010)
Pentax K-x has HD video as well and screw drive motor that T2i does not have..
reply to this comment
Opinion (Claudia — 07/06/2010)
I want to buy a good SLR camera easy to use, but good quality of picture
I was thinking about Olympus E-620
any coments on this?
reply to this comment
I was thinking about Olympus E-620
any coments on this?
by James DeRuvo (07/06/2010)
I think you can do better. Olympus makes fine cameras, but Canon and Nikon are at the top of the food chain in the DSLR world. And they come with HD video capability as well. Try the Canon T2i.
reply to this comment
Opinion (Claudia — 07/06/2010)
James,
thanks for your opinion. How about the Canon T1i versus T2i
I really like the reviews on T2i. I am just a little concerned about its size. Any options for a good quality camera like T2i but less bulky? and easy to use! or you think the T2i is still my best choice?
reply to this comment
thanks for your opinion. How about the Canon T1i versus T2i
I really like the reviews on T2i. I am just a little concerned about its size. Any options for a good quality camera like T2i but less bulky? and easy to use! or you think the T2i is still my best choice?
Help needed to buy a dSLR in India. (priya — 07/06/2010)
I live in India. I have the following requirements :
1. I wish to buy a dSLR with good specifications that I can use during travel to photograph landscapes and do some distant/close range photographs like wild flora and fauna etc.wherever I go. Not into video.
2. I want to learn and get to know what can be done on the camera that I buy,instead of upgrading the body i would want to add accessories like lenses.
3. I would like to go for something that is not too entry level and yet do not want to end up spending a fortune on it.
4. My limited amateurish research boils down to Nikon D5000, Olympus E620, Canon Rebel T2i.
5. My questions :
Should I go for a brand that gives me maximum accessories bundled with the camera?
What camera would still satisfy me once I have learnt the ropes well enough?
reply to this comment
1. I wish to buy a dSLR with good specifications that I can use during travel to photograph landscapes and do some distant/close range photographs like wild flora and fauna etc.wherever I go. Not into video.
2. I want to learn and get to know what can be done on the camera that I buy,instead of upgrading the body i would want to add accessories like lenses.
3. I would like to go for something that is not too entry level and yet do not want to end up spending a fortune on it.
4. My limited amateurish research boils down to Nikon D5000, Olympus E620, Canon Rebel T2i.
5. My questions :
Should I go for a brand that gives me maximum accessories bundled with the camera?
What camera would still satisfy me once I have learnt the ropes well enough?
Liam McCabe (07/06/2010)
The Nikon D5000 and Canon T2i are both great. Video is the big selling point with the T2i, though the image quality is a bit sharper than the D5000 too -- it does cost more though. D5000 is a fine camera. You can always buy more accessories later, but I mean if you can get a great deal on a bundle, then go for it. I can't say which camera you'd be happiest with, because it's really a matter of personal preference -- both the D5000 and T2i are excellent, so if you can find a way to try one out for yourself, at least hold it in your hand, then you might get a better feel for which one you prefer.
reply to this comment
Better Lens or Better Camera for the beginner? (Dr K Banerjee — 07/17/2010)
I'm on the lookout for an entry level dSLR. Should I go for a choice between:
a) Nikon D90/Canon 50D/550D with kit lens (which of these 3 is more versatile?) or a choice between: b) Nikon D5000/Canon 500D(body only) with additional lens?
My budget is $ 1200. Video is not a priority; high quality still shots, in most conditions, are. I would very much appreciate a well explained reply.
Thank you
reply to this comment
a) Nikon D90/Canon 50D/550D with kit lens (which of these 3 is more versatile?) or a choice between: b) Nikon D5000/Canon 500D(body only) with additional lens?
My budget is $ 1200. Video is not a priority; high quality still shots, in most conditions, are. I would very much appreciate a well explained reply.
Thank you
by James DeRuvo (07/21/2010)
Well, Nikon and Canon seems almost neck and neck to me. Both outstanding camera platforms. Great lenses. And when you're looking at DSLRs, it's important to think more platform. Save money on the body now and get a better lens. Then, when you're ready to upgrade, you can boost the body and use the same lenses. So I think it's really a tossup. I'm a Canon man, but I do see that Nikon's biggest advantage is the lens mount, which hasn't changed in 50 years. So that means you can use a wide variety of 35mm films lenses, even if they're on manual only. Hope that helps.
reply to this comment
Beginner (leslie — 07/18/2010)
I am a beginner and am interested in buying a dSLR camera for fun that I can grow into. What would you suggest?
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (07/19/2010)
Pentax K-x or Canon XSi at the lower end. If you can spend a bit more, Nikon D5000. The one you choose now predestines what you might use in the future, because once you start a lens collection, it's appealing to stay with the same brand. Head to a camera shop, take some time to try out different once to see which one feels the most "natural" in your hands -- that accounts for a lot.
reply to this comment
Camera Help (Maeve — 07/19/2010)
If you could pick ANY SLR camera for any price, which would it be? Thanks!
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (07/20/2010)
Nikon D3s. A smooth $5,000. Absolutely crushes in low light. Start saving!
reply to this comment
Michael Babjeck (07/27/2010)
I am not sure which camera would be the best to buy. I am new at DSLR but I have a lot of knowledge in cameras. I am looking at the Nikon D5000 and the new Cannon T2i/500D. I would like to know which one to buy, and why? Thank you for your time.
reply to this comment
Chris Weigl (07/29/2010)
Look at the system rather than just the camera. Compare which lenses you may buy and decide which are within your budget or fit your needs. Remember, you'll probably upgrade the camera again at some point but you're stuck with the system.
reply to this comment
question (Al Taylor — 07/28/2010)
will my zoom lens from my old film slr work on a digital slr?
Thank you
reply to this comment
Thank you
Chris Weigl (07/28/2010)
Depends on how old the lens is and what kind of digital SLR.
reply to this comment
can someone help me out with this? (john — 07/28/2010)
how much does a sony digital still camera run?Model number mvcfd100
reply to this comment
Chris Weigl (07/29/2010)
That camera's worth next to nothing at this point, possibly $40.
reply to this comment
will you be interested in it? Henry and Tina
Thank you,
Charles W Evans, Reviews Editor
HAL-PC Magazine, Inc.
3776 Harper, Suite 103
Houston, TX 77005-3622 USA
reviews@hal-pc.org
www.hal-pc.org
US voice: 1.713.663.7185
Int'l voice: 01+1.713.663.7185