Last updated on 05/15/2013
First-time DSLR buyer who doesn't want to spend a lot for "too much" camera? Experienced hobbyist on a budget? If you need a DSLR for under $1,000, we've lined up the best of the bunch below. $1,000 is still a lot of money, but considering that some DSLRs cost up to five times that much, we consider anything under the four-figure mark "affordable." The cameras below marry a quality feature set with best-in-class image quality, and all represent a fantastic value. Read on to see our favorites.
A Truly Budget SLT
$400-$600: Sony A37
Sitting pretty at under $500, the A37 is the perfect camera for amateurs stepping up to the wonderful world of DSLRs. The A37 is an SLT rather than conventional DSLR, actually, which means that light hits the sensor at all times rather than being redirected to a viewfinder. The benefit to the point and shoot user is huge: you can use the back swivel screen to shoot without any slowdown, autofocus works full-time in burst mode and movies, and there are both weight and size savings. The A37, and all SLT cameras, do use electronic rather than optical viewfinders, but there are a number of benefits, like seeing exposure and white balance before taking the photo, that users may come to enjoy. As for specifications, the A37 has a 16.1 megapixel sensor, shoots 1080/60i HD video, has a fairly low resolution 2.6-inch tilting LCD screen, includes built-in image stabilization, and shoots 5.5 fps at full resolution or faster at 8 megapixels. Image quality is about as good as it gets for cameras under $1500, and we think the target market will really love that live view and small form factor.
Sitting a tad pricer but still as some of our favorites are Sony's Alpha A57 and A65.
$600-$800: Canon Rebel T4i
Canon's T4i is a solid 18 megapixel DSLR with a large sensor and fast processor. With full HD video, a vari-angle LCD and 5 fps burst shooting, the T4i is a good choice for the $600-$800 price range. Canon also improved on their auto focus system with this model and added new creative filters, including High Dynamic Range options. The T4i offers great image quality and usability for its price point.
Canon's T4i is a solid 18 megapixel DSLR with a large sensor and fast processor. With full HD video, a vari-angle LCD and 5 fps burst shooting, the T4i is a good choice for the $600-$800 price range. Canon also improved on their auto focus system with this model and added new creative filters, including High Dynamic Range options. The T4i offers great image quality and usability for its price point.
$800-$1,000: Nikon D5200
Nikon's D5200 uses the same large 24 megapixel sensor as the D3200 (one of our affordable DSLR picks for last year), but adds several features of the older D7000, like a 39-point autofocus and faster 5 fps burst mode. While nearly twice the price of the SLR Sony A37, the D5200 includes more megapixels for a better resolution and a viewfinder. The D5200 also includes RAW shooting.
Nikon's D5200 uses the same large 24 megapixel sensor as the D3200 (one of our affordable DSLR picks for last year), but adds several features of the older D7000, like a 39-point autofocus and faster 5 fps burst mode. While nearly twice the price of the SLR Sony A37, the D5200 includes more megapixels for a better resolution and a viewfinder. The D5200 also includes RAW shooting.
The Best DSLR cameras Under $1000 Comments & Questions (write your own!)
surf photography (FrankyB — 06/16/2013)
Hey there, I'm looking at getting into surf photography, both in and out of the water... I'm thinking of getting the Nikon D5200??? what do you think??? what would be better??? and what type of underwater casing would suit?? ($$$)
reply to this comment
Hillary Grigonis (06/17/2013)
The D5200 is a great entry-level DSLR and does well with sports, so it should handle surf photography well. As far as casing, there's a wide range from the cheaper kind that won't be as comfortable to use like this one: bhphotovideo.com/c/product/... to the very expensive: amazon.com/Ikelite-6801-52-... You'll need to consider how deep into the water the camera will go, and if there will be any impact (falling off a surfboard while wearing the camera). Because of the cost of high-quality housing, you may consider getting the 5200 with a long lens for shots from shore and something like the Olympus Stylus TG-2 iHS that's also shockproof for shots from the water.
reply to this comment
Best Entry Level DSLRs (narendra — 02/22/2013)
The best DSLRs for any one coming from point and shoot category are Canon 600D, Nikon D5100, Sony A55 and Nikon D3100... chose anyone of them, they are the best amongst the lot.. I would rather prefer 600D for its user freindly features and excellent image quality (even in low light).
reply to this comment
Nikon D3200 or Pentak K-5 or a Canon EOS Rebel T4i? (Glen — 02/19/2013)
Nikon D3200 or Pentak K-5 or a Canon EOS Rebel T4i? I want to be able to point and shoot without missing a moving kid or swing. I want to add lenses and be able to go from manual to auto. Please help!! Want to spend between 600 and 1,000
reply to this comment
Greg May (03/01/2013)
The Nikon or Canon would be a better choice, but the lens matters here more than the camera- if you're on a budget, choose a good lens and a slightly older body if you really need super-fast images.
reply to this comment
Orlando (01/27/2013)
I’m looking for a camera and lenses good for taking high quality pictures from jewelry objects. I’m going to post the pictures on line. Can you advise me what camera do I need? Which are the most important camera’s parameters that I should consider? Some particular models that you suggest? Of course quality /price consideration is important.
reply to this comment
Hillary Grigonis (01/28/2013)
If you are looking to take pictures of jewelry, look for something that has a macro setting and pick up a macro lens if possible, that's the best thing for shooting smaller objects like jewelry. But any of the three cameras above would be good for what you are looking for, these models have good resolution for posting pictures to the web as well.
reply to this comment
beginner (denise — 12/18/2012)
i want to get into photography...what camera do you suggest for beginners...without breaking the bank.
reply to this comment
Greg May (03/01/2013)
Try a basic DSLR from Nikon or Canon, and consider your lens needs first. Used models can be found for under $500 with a good lens, or new ones for around that with no lens (or a mediocre one).
reply to this comment
first time buyer (michelle — 12/05/2012)
HELP!!!! I am so tired of spending nearly $500-$1000 a year on professional portraits and having to deal with traveling and planning a photographer. I am a mom with a mission and this year I want Santa to bring me a great camera that will capture my beautiful family. ESPECIALLY MY 2 YEAR OLD WHO WONT SIT STILL!!! any suggestions that won't break the bank? I just want something that is a good investment!
reply to this comment
Hillary Grigonis (01/10/2013)
Any of these cameras listed would do great with family photos and are great investments. But the Nikon D3200 is great for sports, which means it would also do pretty well taking action shots of your toddler!
reply to this comment
Staff camera replacement (Mwatkins — 12/05/2012)
Help! I have to replace a staff camera for a high school yearbook. They shoot anon (on purpose) but I don't know what a good buy is for the staff. We want to move higher than the D40 and D60 they are using now. Should we go to the D200. D5000? Any words of wisdom would be appreciated!
reply to this comment
correction (Mari — 12/05/2012)
sorry about the above post.... keyboard issues? Anyway. The kids shoot Nikon,
Need replacement. Have basic (dark) lenses, but the D40 died so now we only have one D60.
Any suggestions... buying used
reply to this comment
Need replacement. Have basic (dark) lenses, but the D40 died so now we only have one D60.
Any suggestions... buying used
Staff camera replacement (Mwatkins — 12/05/2012)
Help! I have to replace a staff camera for a high school yearbook. They shoot anon (on purpose) but I don't know what a good buy is for the staff. We want to move higher than the D40 and D60 they are using now. Should we go to the D200. D5000? Any words of wisdom would be appreciated!
reply to this comment
Hillary Grigonis (01/10/2013)
I personally use the D5000--and since I use it to take pictures for my local newspaper, it would be great for a yearbook. Plus, it is easy to use for beginners.
reply to this comment
Photography major (Arlene Kaminsky — 11/18/2012)
My son is a photography major at RISD. I want to upgrade his old canon TSi to a better more professional camera but I don't want to brake the bank. I am willing to spend over $1000. Any suggestions?
reply to this comment
Chris Weigl (11/18/2012)
You don't mention exactly why you'd like to upgrade his camera. Newer cameras are definitely better at high ISO, and something like the T4i will do quite a bit better in low light and shoots great video. If you want higher-end build quality I'd take a look at the Canon 60D. It has more external controls and a larger viewfinder.
reply to this comment
sabreena (04/22/2012)
i am looking for an entry level dslr and finding it tough to choose between nikon 3100 and sony a65.one of the most important features for me would be taking photographs in low light without flash.would be really grateful to any help you could give me.
reply to this comment
Chris Weigl (04/22/2012)
How did you decide upon those two cameras? They're in very different classes (look at the price difference). The A65 goes head to head with the Nikon D5100, the Sony A57 goes against the D3100. I'd say get the A57 and be done with it. It's faster, easier to use for those stepping up to a DSLR, and has full-time live view.
reply to this comment
tao (Gucci Sneakers — 03/15/2012)
.The reason for that is quite simple I guess you can understand <a href="chanelwatcheswalletglasseso... Watches</a>.
reply to this comment
B. Hunter (12/28/2011)
I have a 1st generation minolta maxxum with 3 maxxum lenses. It has served me well, but it's time to update. Will the maxxum lenses work with the Sony Alpha models?
reply to this comment
Maxxum camera lenses on Sony Alpha DSLR (KM — 01/03/2012)
Yes. Maxxum cameras have A mounts which is same as the Sony Alpha DSLRs.
I believe the lenses you have are AutoFocus lenses (AF) and will work perfectly with Alpha models. I have one Minolta AF 50mm F 1.7 and works with my Sony Alpha 550. The beauty of the system is these 25 years old lenses will become image stabilized and Alpha DSLRs do the image stabilization in body. All of your Maxxum lenses should work with the Alpha line. They are better built than current plastic body lenses. These old lenses are of metal built.
Depending on whether you plan to buy a fullframe on APS-C sensor the focal length of the old Minolta lenses (as they are meade for 35mm film cameras) would vary. For fullframe (Alpha 850, Alpha 900 or the upcoming Alpha 99) the focal length would be same. But for APS-C cameras (rest of the Alpha line - e.g. Alpha 390, Alpha 550, Alpha 580, Alpha 55, Alpha 65, Alpha 77) the focal length will be 1.5 times. For my Alpha 550, the 50mm lens that I mentioned earlier works with an effective focal length of 75mm.
I would recommend you to go for Alpha 580 if you are planning to buy an APS-C model. This is an outstanding camera I would say. If you need further information about buying an Alpha DSLR or if you have any qquestion feel free to leave a comment. I would get back as soon as I can. Hopefully in the same day!
For more detailed information you can look up at:
dyxum.com/lenses/index.asp
reply to this comment
I believe the lenses you have are AutoFocus lenses (AF) and will work perfectly with Alpha models. I have one Minolta AF 50mm F 1.7 and works with my Sony Alpha 550. The beauty of the system is these 25 years old lenses will become image stabilized and Alpha DSLRs do the image stabilization in body. All of your Maxxum lenses should work with the Alpha line. They are better built than current plastic body lenses. These old lenses are of metal built.
Depending on whether you plan to buy a fullframe on APS-C sensor the focal length of the old Minolta lenses (as they are meade for 35mm film cameras) would vary. For fullframe (Alpha 850, Alpha 900 or the upcoming Alpha 99) the focal length would be same. But for APS-C cameras (rest of the Alpha line - e.g. Alpha 390, Alpha 550, Alpha 580, Alpha 55, Alpha 65, Alpha 77) the focal length will be 1.5 times. For my Alpha 550, the 50mm lens that I mentioned earlier works with an effective focal length of 75mm.
I would recommend you to go for Alpha 580 if you are planning to buy an APS-C model. This is an outstanding camera I would say. If you need further information about buying an Alpha DSLR or if you have any qquestion feel free to leave a comment. I would get back as soon as I can. Hopefully in the same day!
For more detailed information you can look up at:
dyxum.com/lenses/index.asp
Maxxum DSLR on Alpha DSLR (KM — 01/03/2012)
Yes. You can. I use 50mm F 1.7 on Sony Alpha 550. And it works fine.
reply to this comment
KM Hall (12/13/2011)
Similar question to below. Wife wants to upgrade from film camera (Nikon N60) to dSLR. Are the film camera lens (Quantaray 28-80mm and 70-300mm) usable?
reply to this comment
Taking pics at hockey games (Hockey46 — 11/11/2011)
Which DSLR / lens combo is best for pictures at a hockey game .. from end to end .. when standing at the other end. Currently have Canon S5IS and pics are very grainy when taken in the auto "sports" mode.
reply to this comment
Compatible with a Mac (Kathleen — 10/05/2011)
I need one that will download onto a iBook or Mac......The Sony I was looking at does not. What do your recommend for under 4 figures?
reply to this comment
Use of old Nikon lenses with newer Nikon dSLR (Juan Hoth — 09/18/2011)
J. Hoth
I am considering a Nikon D5100. I have two Nikon lensesfrom my old film camera (a Nikon F301) one 35-70 and a 50 lens. Can they be used with the D5100?
reply to this comment
I am considering a Nikon D5100. I have two Nikon lensesfrom my old film camera (a Nikon F301) one 35-70 and a 50 lens. Can they be used with the D5100?
Try a Nikon D5100 (P Valone — 09/17/2011)
I have a Nikon D5100 that takes fantastic pictures. I wouldn't trade it for any of those on your list.
reply to this comment
parent (09/05/2011)
i am looking for a camera suitable for a first year uni studying photography
reply to this comment
Interchangable Cannon lenses ( J. Fredrick — 08/22/2011)
Are Cannon EOS ELAN II lenses interchangable with the Cannon Regel T3i?
reply to this comment
Interchangable Cannon lenses ( J. Fredrick — 08/22/2011)
Are Cannon EOS ELAN II lenses interchangable with the Cannon Regel T3i?
reply to this comment
Interchangable Cannon lenses (John Frederick — 08/22/2011)
I have a cannon eos elan 11. I am considering a Cannon Regel T3i. Will the elan lenses fit the new digital camera. I have yet to get a definitive answer.
reply to this comment
camera for still photos for web sales? (Jason — 08/18/2011)
I am looking to have a web site made for me soon, for products I will be selling. I will need very clear and detailed photos. Photos not so big it takes a long time for the web page to load, but the cleanest, clearest,and with the best color? Wich camera???
reply to this comment
Camera w/len (Jack Kelly — 08/13/2011)
I am looking for a camera w/lens kit that works best for taking photos of my kids playing sports. I am trying not to break the bank to pay for this camera. Thanks
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (08/15/2011)
Any dSLR can do a decent job shooting action -- anything on this page will work. You might want to specifically look at the Sony A55 or upcoming Sony A35 -- they're both particularly fast. (All cameras listed here include kit lenses)
Another thing to consider is maybe getting a body-only version of a dSLR (usually $100 cheaper than the kit), and then adding a lens with a little more zoom so you can get better shots from the stands. You could look for a 18-135mm lens from Tamron or Sigma -- they usually go for cheap. I believe Canon is also heavily discounting their zoom lenses through Amazon.com for a few weeks -- that's worth investigating.
reply to this comment
Another thing to consider is maybe getting a body-only version of a dSLR (usually $100 cheaper than the kit), and then adding a lens with a little more zoom so you can get better shots from the stands. You could look for a 18-135mm lens from Tamron or Sigma -- they usually go for cheap. I believe Canon is also heavily discounting their zoom lenses through Amazon.com for a few weeks -- that's worth investigating.
Chase (08/13/2011)
I am stumped on which of the Canons are the best for my first foray into dSLRs. Im a mom taking sports/kids/pet vacation shots. What about kits vs. buying pieces individually? any kits you recommend? My friend told me to get a rebel body and buy a separate lens, but not sure which lens would work? Obviously confused in Arlington, VA
reply to this comment
Cannon Lens (Anita Valentine — 08/06/2011)
Will the lens from a Cannon AE1 Program fit any of the digital Cannons?
reply to this comment
Gerry (08/18/2011)
The film Canon lenses use the FD mount, the digital Canon lenses use the EF mount which are incompatible with each other unless you can find an adapter (I don't know of any).
The only camera systems I know of that offer compatibility between their oldest (1950's) lenses and newest bodies are the Nikon F bayonet mount and Leica M mount systems.
reply to this comment
The only camera systems I know of that offer compatibility between their oldest (1950's) lenses and newest bodies are the Nikon F bayonet mount and Leica M mount systems.
What works with what? (Jean — 07/28/2011)
I have a Rebel G canon 35 mm camera. If I bought a Canon 60D would the lenses fit on it or any other accessories work. Would I have to buy all new lenses and light?
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (08/04/2011)
I believe that all your lenses and your flash should work with the Canon 60D (or any of the T-series models right beneath it). As long as your lenses are EF or EF-S mount, you're good to go.
reply to this comment
yt (07/26/2011)
Hi, im a graphic design student who shoots mostly small objects(craft, chalk, strings etc) and also text, posters, and textured surfaces. I seldom use flash due to close up shoots and use natural lighting.
Looking to get my first dlsr and deciding between the Sony A55(maybe wait for A77?) or Canon 600D. But i really need it to last me atleast 2/3 years.
I have tried holding both and am more or less equally comfortable with both.
Am also thinking of getting a 18-250mm lens. Could you please advise btwn the 2 and the lens, and may i know if the lack of manual settings on the A55 is very crucial?
Thanks alot!
reply to this comment
Looking to get my first dlsr and deciding between the Sony A55(maybe wait for A77?) or Canon 600D. But i really need it to last me atleast 2/3 years.
I have tried holding both and am more or less equally comfortable with both.
Am also thinking of getting a 18-250mm lens. Could you please advise btwn the 2 and the lens, and may i know if the lack of manual settings on the A55 is very crucial?
Thanks alot!
Liam McCabe (08/02/2011)
It's really a toss-up -- the Canon is more traditional, and you might find as a graphic design student that its optical viewfinder gives you a more "realistic" feel while you're composing shots. You probably don't need all the speed that the A55 offers, but it won't hurt to have it. And the A55 doesn't have a lack of manual control -- offers pretty much the same shooting modes as the Canon. I'd lean toward the Canon simply for the optical viewfinder, but really, you have to go with your gut on this one.
Other points:
- The A77 will be considerably more expensive than the A55, so I don't think in your case it's worth waiting for.
- If you're going to do shoot a lot of textures and closeups of small objects, I'd suggest that you buy some kind of prime, if not a macro lens, before you go for the 18-250. Even something as simple as Canon's 50mm f/1.8 is going to give you sharper, more detailed shots than the 18-55mm kit lens, and especially an 18-250.
reply to this comment
Other points:
- The A77 will be considerably more expensive than the A55, so I don't think in your case it's worth waiting for.
- If you're going to do shoot a lot of textures and closeups of small objects, I'd suggest that you buy some kind of prime, if not a macro lens, before you go for the 18-250. Even something as simple as Canon's 50mm f/1.8 is going to give you sharper, more detailed shots than the 18-55mm kit lens, and especially an 18-250.
Movie Mode? (Tony — 07/22/2011)
I need something to shoot movies on. I'd rather not have to shell out 3,000 for the canon Mark II. Any suggestions?
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (07/26/2011)
Any in-production dSLR shoots HD video, though Canon is generally considered to offer the best video modes. The Canon T2i, T3i, and 60D shoot roughly equal-quality 1080p video. Check out some clips on YouTube to see if it works well enough for you. From there, you can step up to the Canon 7D, which has a slightly better movie mode.
reply to this comment
Amanda M. (05/28/2011)
Hi! I am an entry-level hobbyist looking to improve my skills and invest in a dSLR to last me for several years and a semester abroad in Europe. I shoot a lot of video, too, so 1080p video is a necessity. I think the Nikon 3100 is my best bet, but I am willing to spend a little more (but under $1,000) if it's really worth it -- I was looking at the Canon EOS Rebel T3i/600D, for example. What would you recommend? Am I missing a model that would work better for me?
reply to this comment
Chris Weigl (06/01/2011)
The Nikon 3100 is certainly a good choice, but I think you've missed the Sony A33/A55. These models aren't conventional DSLRs but instead use a translucent mirror. The viewfinder is electronic rather than optical, but the benefit to you is a smaller camera that autofocuses while shooting video and while continuous shooting. It's hard to beat the Sony's for pure bang for your buck. I don't think the Canon Rebel gives you much extra over the D3100 if you decide to go a more conventional route.
reply to this comment
Mary (05/22/2011)
Hello,
I am an artist and I need to upgrade my camera so that I can photograph my work. The art is heavily textured and sometimes will have a sheen. Some of the pieces are as small as 12" x 12" and some as large as 60" x 48". I want a camera that will capture the detail on even these large pieces and ultimately have giclee reproductions made at a size of at least 18" x 24". For this I would need the image to be very sharp, 300 dpi at that final size. I was looking at the Nikon 3100 or D5100, with the need to buy the right lenses. But I am not sure what is the right lens, or what is the right camera for that matter. Any advice would be greatly appreciated.
Mary 5/22/11
reply to this comment
I am an artist and I need to upgrade my camera so that I can photograph my work. The art is heavily textured and sometimes will have a sheen. Some of the pieces are as small as 12" x 12" and some as large as 60" x 48". I want a camera that will capture the detail on even these large pieces and ultimately have giclee reproductions made at a size of at least 18" x 24". For this I would need the image to be very sharp, 300 dpi at that final size. I was looking at the Nikon 3100 or D5100, with the need to buy the right lenses. But I am not sure what is the right lens, or what is the right camera for that matter. Any advice would be greatly appreciated.
Mary 5/22/11
by James DeRuvo (05/26/2011)
Well, your instinct on going with a DSLR is a good one. The glass is far superior. And the Nikon D5100 is a good choice. I'd also go with a good 28-105mm lens. The nice thing about Nikons though, is that you can still use lenses that are 50 years old and there's some fantastic Nikor lenses, like the 105mm portrait, that are worth their weight in gold.
Couse, this all depends on your budget. Nikon lenses are pretty pricey, but third party options like SIGMA shouldn't be ignored. Sigma is making some fantastic glass which offers great value for the budget conscious.
reply to this comment
Couse, this all depends on your budget. Nikon lenses are pretty pricey, but third party options like SIGMA shouldn't be ignored. Sigma is making some fantastic glass which offers great value for the budget conscious.
difference quality pictures (connie winget — 05/19/2011)
will you be able to notice a diffence in picture quality between a nikon DL120 and a nikon D3100 if you are not a professonal that is comparing pics
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (05/20/2011)
You mean the L120? Yes, there is a very obvious difference. I mean, in bright outdoor conditions, you'll get good shots from both cameras, but the D3100 will have that X factor that a point-and-shoot just can't replicate -- more details in the highlights and shadows of the pictures, most obviously. And then in more challenging conditions, the dSLR will take better pictures with much less effort.
reply to this comment
Lily G (05/05/2011)
I would purchase my very first DSLR, which would be better - NIKON D5000 or D3100?
Is it worth it to step up to D90?
I would go to national parks in Arizona, Utah and Wyoming this summer, and would love some insight which camera would be best to purchase.
Thank you so much for your help.
reply to this comment
Is it worth it to step up to D90?
I would go to national parks in Arizona, Utah and Wyoming this summer, and would love some insight which camera would be best to purchase.
Thank you so much for your help.
Liam McCabe (05/06/2011)
I think the D3100 is an excellent starter dSLR, but if you're not too price sensitive, take a look at the D5100. It offers the same excellent image quality as the enthusiast oriented D7000 (which costs a bunch more) and has a more versatile design and interface than the D3100. Price is in the middle too -- seems to be a great camera.
The D5000 is out of production now -- it's still decent, but only if you get it for a low price. A number of disadvantages compared to the D5100, including sensor/image quality, bulky body, and only 720p HD video.
Also, consider grabbing an additional lens. If you buy a kit configuration of any of the lenses above, you'll get an 18-55mm kit lens -- a good starter lens, but you might also want to grab something with a bit more telephoto capability. Maybe a 55-200mm. Just a suggestion.
Good luck!
reply to this comment
The D5000 is out of production now -- it's still decent, but only if you get it for a low price. A number of disadvantages compared to the D5100, including sensor/image quality, bulky body, and only 720p HD video.
Also, consider grabbing an additional lens. If you buy a kit configuration of any of the lenses above, you'll get an 18-55mm kit lens -- a good starter lens, but you might also want to grab something with a bit more telephoto capability. Maybe a 55-200mm. Just a suggestion.
Good luck!
Lily G (05/20/2011)
Hi Liam,
Thank you so much for your insight. I looked at Nikon D5100, and that's the one I'll go for.
Regarding the additional lens, does the 55-300 mm make alot of difference than 55-200 mm ?
reply to this comment
Thank you so much for your insight. I looked at Nikon D5100, and that's the one I'll go for.
Regarding the additional lens, does the 55-300 mm make alot of difference than 55-200 mm ?
Liam McCabe (05/23/2011)
Yeah it's noticeable -- 300mm is 1.5x closer than 200mm, a pretty big difference. But if you won't be shooting many telephoto shots, you probably won't miss it. All depends on what kind of shooting you plan to do.
reply to this comment
Macro (Carlos Siri — 04/24/2011)
I'm a pediatric surgeon that take pictures of small and very small injuries on the skin and other areas and i'm a lover of "micro nature". i have very good pictures of the subject (i think). Which camera do you think will have the best macro? what may you comment about the macro function of the Coolpix Nikon L120? Thank you
reply to this comment
Ala (03/30/2011)
Hi, I have an Olympus E520 and since it doesn't have Video i would like to trade it in for a newer camera, where should I go? I have 2 Olympus Lens?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (04/02/2011)
Orin you have Olympus lenses, you can save a bundle by staying in the family and going with the E5. But frankly, since it encodes it's video with the Motin JPEG codec, you won't get as good a quality than if you went with the Canon 7D in same price range. Also, the focal lenfth multipler is greater on the E5, meaning that your lenses will be shorter because of the partial frame censor. So in the end, my recommendation is to sell the lot and use the money to pick up a comparable Canon 7D or Nikon 5000D.
reply to this comment
Which body type to purchase? (A Steffaro — 03/11/2011)
I am an avid photographer..three kids and lots of family trips to take pictures of. My Nikon D40 body got broken beyond
repair and need to purchase and new body- quickly before our next vacation. Looking at Nikon, Canon EOS Ti 15 and the Sony Alpha. What to do???
reply to this comment
repair and need to purchase and new body- quickly before our next vacation. Looking at Nikon, Canon EOS Ti 15 and the Sony Alpha. What to do???
Liam McCabe (03/11/2011)
Any of the models in the above round-up are very solid choices. We like the D3100 in the 400-600 price range. You can use your old Nikon D40 lenses on it as well.
reply to this comment
Canon 550d and Sony A33 (Wilson — 02/19/2011)
Hi, I'm currently comparing canon 55d and Sony A33, actually overall which is more better?
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (02/22/2011)
Both very good -- the A33 is significantly faster and slightly smaller. The 550D/T2i has, in my opinion, a better user interface, but that's always up to personal preference.
reply to this comment
Luciana (02/17/2011)
Please, I looking for a camera because I really would like to start a course and make photography part of my career. I am architect!!And I need to invest in a good one. What camera would you suggest for me??
reply to this comment
Chris Weigl (02/18/2011)
You don't mention a budget, but most architectural photographers shoot with a full frame camera, most likely a Canon 5D Mark II or a D3/D3x. Nikon's 14-24mm lens is a stunner although very expensive. If you want to start off cheaper, get any of the budget models from Canon or Nikon and a Sigma 8-16mm. You'll also need to invest in a tripod.
reply to this comment
Previous question follow up on your response. Please Help! (Jennifer — 02/13/2011)
You said "One thing though. Both the T1 and T2 aren't full frame, so the focal length may be off as you shoot with the 650 lenses." I do not understand what this means. really NOT techno savy! and what is EF? any other recommendations, or just these two?
I wrote back in 9/6/2010. I now need something but feel so much like a beginner & overwhelmed that I am not willing right now to put effort into learning a camera until my kids are older. anything super easy with extraordinary pics? I don't know what the full frame ref. was. Is this something lacking that will be a disappointment in my pics?
reply to this comment
I wrote back in 9/6/2010. I now need something but feel so much like a beginner & overwhelmed that I am not willing right now to put effort into learning a camera until my kids are older. anything super easy with extraordinary pics? I don't know what the full frame ref. was. Is this something lacking that will be a disappointment in my pics?
Liam McCabe (02/14/2011)
Sorry about any confusion -- full-frame refers to the size of the sensor, and you need to pay upwards of $1500 to get one of those cameras. Not sure why our guy thought it was a good idea to suggest a full-frame camera for your needs.
Simply put, if you want a good start dSLR, choose from the Pentax K-x, the Nikon D3100, or the Canon T2i. There are differences, but they're all easy to use. Try to get to a store and see which one feels most natural in your hands.
reply to this comment
Simply put, if you want a good start dSLR, choose from the Pentax K-x, the Nikon D3100, or the Canon T2i. There are differences, but they're all easy to use. Try to get to a store and see which one feels most natural in your hands.
DLSR for Indoor Soccer? (Footyphotos — 02/12/2011)
I am looking to buy an entry level DLSR for the purpose of photographing soccer leagues. The games are 7vs7 and played on a field roughly 65 x 30 yards. In the summer it is fine, but all winter games are indoors and the lighting in the inflatable soccer domes is terrible.Trying to get the shutter speed up high enough to get reasonable images gives me photos that are so dark that when I lighten them up the noise is terrible.
I was looking at the Canon T2i, but the more I research the more I am leaning towards a Pentax k-x. It seems to be well reviewed for low light performance and the cons listed in reviews are not important for what I want it for. The price difference is pretty tempting too as I can get the k-x plus a 50-200 or 75-300 lens for well below the T2i and basic kit lens. Does anyone have any thoughts or tips?
reply to this comment
I was looking at the Canon T2i, but the more I research the more I am leaning towards a Pentax k-x. It seems to be well reviewed for low light performance and the cons listed in reviews are not important for what I want it for. The price difference is pretty tempting too as I can get the k-x plus a 50-200 or 75-300 lens for well below the T2i and basic kit lens. Does anyone have any thoughts or tips?
Liam McCabe (02/14/2011)
Yeah I think you're best with the K-x -- it is great for low-light, and the two-lens deal is unbeatable.
reply to this comment
D90 (old rocker — 02/11/2011)
The Best Affordable dSLR Camera would be the Nikon D90 as of Feb.2011. Although in Nov. 2008, black friday, I bought a Nikon D80 for 2 reasons. 1)it didn't have a video camera in it! 2) the D90 had just come out and it was about $1800. so the $600. D80 w/18-135mm kit lens was a great deal. I still shoot this camera along with my K-M 7D. Forget buying new cameras, invest in a good lens.gl hf
reply to this comment
Holly E. (02/04/2011)
I am taking my children on their first Disney trip and my camera has decided to die on me. I am very interested in a DSLR (video is not a concern) and am having a hard time choosing. Can someone direct me to a camera under $1000????
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (02/05/2011)
The Canon T1i would be a good option. It recently was upgraded with it's firmware and takes really good pictures. And it's also had a price cut. So that's where I'd look.
reply to this comment
Dianne Jones (01/30/2011)
Please can someone tell me about the Canon 60D.Any good.Have a Canon 400D at the moment.Want a good quick action camera for Africa but robust.have lens for canon so would like to stay in that area
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (02/02/2011)
Imaging-resource has a glowing review of it with it's big selling point being superior performance in low light, hd video with external mic jack an a nifty pull out LCD screen. The hdvideo alone makes it a worthy upgrade IMHO.
imaging-resource.com/PRODS/...
reply to this comment
imaging-resource.com/PRODS/...
Trade up - or not? (Thomas — 01/24/2011)
I'm an upper level amateur, shooting with a Nikon D80 right now. I've read Ken Rockwell's review saying that the D90's CMOS processor is SO MUCH better that I should trade up. I've been eyeing a used D200 also, so it's a choice for me. What do you say?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (01/27/2011)
The true secret to Nikon is the glass. The D200 was a good camera but I'm not sure you need to trade up just yet. I'd wait and get yourself a D90 when you can afford it. That way you have HD video to boot.
reply to this comment
(01/11/2011)
Hi, I was given a Minolta X-700 and four different size lenses.I would like to purchase a DSLR. On which camera would these lenses fit? I am a beginner photographer.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (01/12/2011)
Your only chance is to use them on the Sony Alpha series. Sony bought Minolta camera business and added some much needed improvements. You may lose some auto functions, but they use the same lens mounts to worst case, you can use them all on manual.
reply to this comment
Lynne Wahnefried (12/27/2010)
Saw an ad for the Canon EOS Rebel Digital SLR What can you tell me about it?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (12/28/2010)
Can you be more specific? There's 7or 8 different models. I can tell you that in general Canon's Rebel series are excellent and teres one for every budget.
reply to this comment
Nikon D3100 (Jessica F — 12/30/2010)
Would you still consider this the best buy for enry-level purchaser in 2010/2011? I want to purchase a DSLR, am leaning towards Nikons, but I don't know why. :)
reply to this comment
Nikon D3100 (Jessica F — 12/30/2010)
I meant to list the camera, Nikon D3100
reply to this comment
Cherry Blossum (12/27/2010)
Hi
Im looking for a camera that i can take photos of motocross, wildlife, beaches and family portraits.
Sadly i have a limited price range of $400. All these cameras seem really good but very pricey.
Can you suggest anything? I would also really like a camera with a fast shutter. PLEASE HELP
Much appreciated.
Thanks
(Great website by the way. Keep up the good work)
reply to this comment
Im looking for a camera that i can take photos of motocross, wildlife, beaches and family portraits.
Sadly i have a limited price range of $400. All these cameras seem really good but very pricey.
Can you suggest anything? I would also really like a camera with a fast shutter. PLEASE HELP
Much appreciated.
Thanks
(Great website by the way. Keep up the good work)
by James DeRuvo (12/28/2010)
Not in dslrs. A good point and shoot like the Casio FH100 has great high speed image capture.
reply to this comment
Josh (12/26/2010)
I am looking to venture into the dSLR world and was looking at Nikon. I'm a craigslist addict and I came across this for 400$. Why should or shouldn't I take this deal?
nikon d40x body with70-200 and 35 and 20-75 lens
I know this camera is older but since I'm new does it matter?
reply to this comment
nikon d40x body with70-200 and 35 and 20-75 lens
I know this camera is older but since I'm new does it matter?
Liam McCabe (12/26/2010)
You'll miss out on some new features, mostly video mode, but otherwise, that's a great deal for a starter kit. In any case, you'll be able to hang on to those lenses no matter what camera you get.
reply to this comment
peter (12/23/2010)
which is best a Sony alpha a390 or a Canon eos 1000d slr and why?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (12/23/2010)
I like the lenses for the Canon and IMHO focusing is faster. Some love the Alpha and they're a good camera. But by comparison, Canon pulls away.
reply to this comment
Nice Optical Paperweight? (Daniel Hart — 12/15/2010)
I need some help concerning Minolta cameras and lenses. I started with an XG-1 and moved up to an X-700 and have several lenses which includes a Minolta 100-500mm zoom lens. In the statement about chasing the lens, do I have a nice optical paperweight stuck in the 'analog' era or can it be adapted to a new digital camera for the digital age?
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (12/15/2010)
Hmm...well they're more useful than paperweights, but you do have to go outside the box to make them work.
In general, glass is glass, so a lens made in the film era should have no problem working on a digital camera. But the problem in your case is that your Minolta lenses use an SR-type mount, which is no longer in use on any cameras. In fact, Minolta stopped producing SR-mount cameras about 25 years ago.
As you may know, Sony bought Konica-Minolta in the last decade (I want to say around 2005?) and adopted their A-mount system for their own Sony Alpha cameras. But SR mount lenses won't fit on A mount cameras.
Buuut, third party manufacturers make all kinds of adapters so that older lenses can fit onto all types of new mounts. I didn't find any SR-to A adapters, but you can find them for Pentax K mounts, Sony E mounts, Canon EF mounts, etc etc. They don't support autofocus, but it's better than nothing. Good luck.
reply to this comment
In general, glass is glass, so a lens made in the film era should have no problem working on a digital camera. But the problem in your case is that your Minolta lenses use an SR-type mount, which is no longer in use on any cameras. In fact, Minolta stopped producing SR-mount cameras about 25 years ago.
As you may know, Sony bought Konica-Minolta in the last decade (I want to say around 2005?) and adopted their A-mount system for their own Sony Alpha cameras. But SR mount lenses won't fit on A mount cameras.
Buuut, third party manufacturers make all kinds of adapters so that older lenses can fit onto all types of new mounts. I didn't find any SR-to A adapters, but you can find them for Pentax K mounts, Sony E mounts, Canon EF mounts, etc etc. They don't support autofocus, but it's better than nothing. Good luck.
Carol M (12/15/2010)
my husband has a canon power shot s5 is, but he has taken up birding and wants a more advanced camera, with interchangeable lens, what's your suggestion?
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (12/15/2010)
If he's comfortable with Canon, it's probably a good place to start. He could check out the Canon T1i, which is a solid entry-level dSLR. Picture quality is phenomenal compared to any point and shoot he's used. He might also consider the T2i or 60D, but he's probably best going with the T1i and investing the extra money in a longer lens for those far-away birds.
Other great entry-level dSLRs include Nikon D3100 and Pentax K-x. Same idea regarding a longer lens there.
reply to this comment
Other great entry-level dSLRs include Nikon D3100 and Pentax K-x. Same idea regarding a longer lens there.
Larry (12/10/2010)
I'm currently in the market for a dslr. I'm looking at the Canon T2i or the Nikon D90. Does one stand out above the other? They both look pretty good but the Canon appears to be better for video.
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (12/13/2010)
Both are great cameras, but yes the T2i has a better video mode (1080p, more refined control). The D90 was the first dSLR to ever shoot HD video, so that's commendable, but Canon had the benefit of time to tweak some things in the T2i to really get it right.
Honestly, it's a matter of personal preference. The Canon handles more like a beginner dSLR, whereas the Nikon handles more like an enthusiast dSLR. Your mileage may vary.
reply to this comment
Honestly, it's a matter of personal preference. The Canon handles more like a beginner dSLR, whereas the Nikon handles more like an enthusiast dSLR. Your mileage may vary.
M. Greenfeld (12/09/2010)
I have an old Nikon 35mm camera. Will the lenses from this camera work with the newer digital nikons
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (12/09/2010)
Most likely, yes. The great thing about the Nikon system is the legacy support -- as long as the lenses were made in the past 60 years, they should work on any new Nikon.
reply to this comment
Starting photography Business, new to DSLR (Wendy Brisentine — 12/06/2010)
I am wanting to start my own photography business at home. I'm new to the dslr cameras and I want a good one for around $1,000 to get ne started...I plan to get very serious about my photography business...hopefully to make it my only means of income some day...suggestions of what to start off with that will carry me through until I have more experience and client revenue???
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (12/14/2010)
Well, the Canon T2i is a good entry level DSLR. Depending on what sort of business you're going into, I'd get a lens with it that covers the portrait range plus a tad more. Like around 18-135 or there abouts. A good Speedlight zoomable flash as well. Other accessories will depend on what kind of shooting you're doing. But you'll want Adobe Lightroom for post processing of your images on your PC.
For a few hundred more, I'd go with the Canon 7D. It's similar to the T2i but instead is has double the processing power.
reply to this comment
For a few hundred more, I'd go with the Canon 7D. It's similar to the T2i but instead is has double the processing power.
portrait (Wendy Brisentine — 12/14/2010)
I will be focusing mainly on portrait photography. Newborn, kids, wedding, etc. Anymore advice? Thanks for your reply/replies!
reply to this comment
Brent D. (12/01/2010)
Thanks, just didn't want to get burned on Jan. 1st. However, I think I'd be happy with the camera for the price its at now anyway. Thanks again!
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (12/02/2010)
Well if you were waiting until January 1st, I'd wait a tad longer until after CES, that's usually when the main price drops occur. But I doubt they'll get any lower before Christmas, so go for it.
reply to this comment
Brent D. (12/04/2010)
I'll probably wait then, seeing as this will be funded mostly by Christmas and likely Birthday (January) money... Thanks for your help, you guys are awesome!
reply to this comment
T1i now? (Brent D. — 11/30/2010)
I'm pretty set on getting a T1i (T2i is a bit out of my price range, considering I'm starting from scratch and will need to buy a flash, etc.) I'm waiting until after Christmas to buy, should I wait longer, or will the price be pretty static for the next few months? Also, would you recommend the 430EX over the 270EX flash?
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (12/01/2010)
It's tough to tell how long it'll stay at the current price, but it should be pretty stable for at least six-eight weeks. You might not see much of a discount after Christmas, but it certainly won't be any more expensive.
It could possibly drop further in March-April -- Canon announced the T2i last February, might announce a new consumer/entry-level model around that time, but really too early to tell.
The whole game of waiting for prices to drop etc. is as old as retail -- you could wait, but you might never end up getting what you want, since the next price cut is always right around the corner!
reply to this comment
It could possibly drop further in March-April -- Canon announced the T2i last February, might announce a new consumer/entry-level model around that time, but really too early to tell.
The whole game of waiting for prices to drop etc. is as old as retail -- you could wait, but you might never end up getting what you want, since the next price cut is always right around the corner!
Amy Bethea (11/29/2010)
I own a Canon XSi and am interested in upgrading. ?T2i vs 7D vs D60. I am not so heavily invested in lenses that I could not change to Nikon perhaps D90. I would like the best body in the midrange pricing with the most versatility. Do a lot of sporting events, dance photography and would love to be able to do underwater photography. Advice on lens choices also greatly appreciated. Thank you!
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (11/30/2010)
I LOVE my 7D. Shoots great images, video, etc. It's essentially a T2i with a sturdier frame and twice as many processors. So if you can swing it, go with the 7D.
reply to this comment
DSLR from Nikon family ( — 11/23/2010)
Thanks - I couldn't find anything on the 5000s either. I am not interested in video at all - so would you buy D5000 or D3000? Is live view that important? Also what does 'sluggish image buffer' mean? Other than no live view and no video record this has been the main criticism of the D3000 (I believe).
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (11/24/2010)
It can be, the. Again we got along for 100 years with it. I never use live view, preferin the viewfinder. The image buffer is the time between the shutter press and being able to view your images on screen - very sluggish, sometimes even seeming to take more than four seconds for image review. And even longer in continuous shooting.
So in essence its a slow writing kind of shutter lag.
reply to this comment
So in essence its a slow writing kind of shutter lag.
Now to the lens ( — 11/25/2010)
So I have narrowed my lens choice down to 18-105mm because that seems the most versatile and will prevent me from having to switch lenses as much. I have found the 18-55mm lens limiting in the past. Would it make any difference if I choose the D3000 or the D5000? Also, one lens the burglars didn't find was my old Kiron 80-200mm - should I just sell it or should this be part of my consideration when I buy the camera??
reply to this comment
Question on old Canon lenses for new digital bodies (Harold Sharp — 11/23/2010)
Can the canon lenses I used on my F1 and T90 bodies be used on the Rebel T1i body?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (11/23/2010)
No. It will only take EF lenses.
reply to this comment
Best value entry model plus lens (veneta — 11/22/2010)
I would like to buy my first DSLR from the Nikon family - for a change(former Canon owner but my old cameras and lenses were stolen when home was broken into). I am not interested in video AT ALL and just want to take portraits of my kids/family, family hols and maybe later kids at sporting events. Can you advise on the best value model (new or 2nd hand) and the most versatile lens (I have found I am not good at swapping). I want to be able to use it for the next 10-20 years. Thanks
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (11/23/2010)
I'd still recommend the D series. But the new 5000S is a good entry level camera as well.
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (11/23/2010)
James there is no camera called the 5000S, not one that's recent anyway.
To the reader above, the D5000 is a great entry level camera, as is the D3100. The D3100 is a newer model and has a better video mode, but the image quality should be roughly the same.
reply to this comment
To the reader above, the D5000 is a great entry level camera, as is the D3100. The D3100 is a newer model and has a better video mode, but the image quality should be roughly the same.
baby dSLR (Melissa — 11/02/2010)
I am looking into a DSLR camera to photograph our new baby and record his milestones as he grows. I need to stay under $1000, but I am open to any brand that will provide quality pictures and allows growth, both with the baby and with my photography skills. Along with the camera, what lenses would best suit our current situation as most pictures will be close-ups of the baby and few long distance images? We have a point and shoot from canon and a HD video camcorder so I'm looking for a camera to fill this gap. Video on the camera is not a necessity as we have other devices specifically for video. Thanks!
reply to this comment
glass (sanjai bajaj — 10/30/2010)
Which better lenses can be bought with t2i, instead of 18-55 es
reply to this comment
Best DSLR for indoor sports shooting? time to upgrade (Jamie C. — 10/26/2010)
I own a Sony A300 and have loved it! However I'm ready to upgrade to a more professional level camera due my the fact that my photography has gone to a more serious level. Semi-pro if you will. My specialty has become basketball photography (action shots) and now people.,coaches, teams etc are now seeking me out and even sports illustrated wanted to buy some photos. I understand that its about the glass..and sadly renting lenses for a sony locally just isn't an option. I am willing to switch brands based on how they shoot in high iso situations and affordability of good lenses for this type of shooting in poor lighting conditions. I do love my Sony..but am ready to move on so can get businnesss going full swing. Any reccomendations? Thanks in advance!
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (10/27/2010)
Well, take a look at what the pros use. CANON. Many use Nikon as well, but most sports pros go with Canon. Ultimately, I like the 5D Mark II as it's full frame and takes 1080p video as well. But at $3K for the body, you can get almost as good performance for half the cost with the Canon 7D. I shoot it and it's an awesome platform.
reply to this comment
SHOOTING ORIGINAL PAINTINGS WITH A SLR CAMERA (Myrt — 10/25/2010)
What's the best SLR camera under $700 to shoot
original paintings up to size 24" High?
reply to this comment
original paintings up to size 24" High?
by James DeRuvo (10/26/2010)
Any camera will do. The key is the lighting. You want to use a few flashes bouncing their light to spread it out. Check out this link for how: diyphotography.net/taking_p...
reply to this comment
Novice @ Sports Photography (C. Plummer — 10/25/2010)
I currently use a Panasonic Lumix DMZ-FZ50. Love it for still photos but am VERY disappointed when I try to photograph my kids' sporting events in low light (at night or in the gym). Looked into purchasing a DMW-LT55 Tele Conversion Lens, but I don't think that would help with the blurred action shots. What is a good dSLR alternative for my desired application? Money IS an issue...what, if any, additional lense is recommended?
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (10/25/2010)
Sports photography is notoriously difficult, especially if you're trying to do it indoors. The conversion lens won't help with the blurring, that's more a function of the image stabilization and shutter speed.
Any dSLR will be better than the FZ50 (or any non-dSLR) -- the Pentax K-x is a great low-cost dSLR, and the Canon XS is a solid option as well -- but the factor main factor is the lens. You'd want a telephoto lens, something that extends to 200mm I'd say. Those are quite expensive and it still wouldn't be as long as the zoom on the FZ50, but your shots will be light years better -- just have to get closer to the action.
Your other option is to upgrade to the Panasonic FZ100 -- it's the newest model of the FZ50, upgraded in a number of key ways. Faster burst shooting, a better sensor, and longer zoom (and 1080i HD video if that interests you). I just tested it and am writing the review -- it won't get rid of all the blur in low lighting for action shots, but it'll be noticeably better, and cost a lot less than a dSLR w/ lens.
reply to this comment
Any dSLR will be better than the FZ50 (or any non-dSLR) -- the Pentax K-x is a great low-cost dSLR, and the Canon XS is a solid option as well -- but the factor main factor is the lens. You'd want a telephoto lens, something that extends to 200mm I'd say. Those are quite expensive and it still wouldn't be as long as the zoom on the FZ50, but your shots will be light years better -- just have to get closer to the action.
Your other option is to upgrade to the Panasonic FZ100 -- it's the newest model of the FZ50, upgraded in a number of key ways. Faster burst shooting, a better sensor, and longer zoom (and 1080i HD video if that interests you). I just tested it and am writing the review -- it won't get rid of all the blur in low lighting for action shots, but it'll be noticeably better, and cost a lot less than a dSLR w/ lens.
C. Plummer (10/26/2010)
Having used the before mentioned Panasonic camera, I am totally clueless as to the different lenses for the dSLRs. For instance, what does the following mean: "EF 50mm f/1.8 II" ? What numbers are most important for me when looking for a good lense with which to shoot sporting events? 200mm is one as previously suggested, but what about the "f/1.8 II"? What the heck do I look for here?
reply to this comment
lenses for pentax kx (Judith Davis — 10/23/2010)
can you use film slr lenses made for olympus om-1 for the pentax kx?
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (10/25/2010)
Those lens mounts are quite different, you'd need some obscure adapter and it would only be manual focus. I'm sure you could find a way if you wanted to, but again, it's a matter of tracking down an adapter, if one even exists.
reply to this comment
lenses for pentax k-x (Judith Davis — 10/23/2010)
are these 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 AL and 50-200mm f/4-5.6 ED lenses
the best ones for the pentax k-x or are you better off buying lenses separately?
reply to this comment
the best ones for the pentax k-x or are you better off buying lenses separately?
by James DeRuvo (10/26/2010)
They're basic kit lenses. They do fine for a beginner or someone looking for a good deal.
reply to this comment
Looking at an 'entry level but growable' dSLR camera (Susan Kelly — 10/19/2010)
Hi - Looking for my 'first real' camera - a dSLR. Have been recommended the Canon T1I as a good, solid entry camera with enough to keep me growing for some time and a fine quality picture. What do you think? Is this a solid starting place, which will allow me a bit of 'automatic' when I need it, but also give me the opportunity to grow into a stronger hobby?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (10/20/2010)
It's a good place to start. But I'd go with the T2i. Better MP, higher quality HD video.
reply to this comment
extended zoom or dslr? (Judith Davis — 10/19/2010)
I am an experienced old Olympus OM-1 and have several lenses. Am torn between the extended zoom Panasonic DMC-FZ series 35 or 40 or 100 or going with a DSLR. I don't want to spend more than $400, though. I know I can get an adapter for my Vivitar and Olympus lenses to work on an Olympus E-volt but I'm still torn between the extended zoom or the DSLR. Any guidance?
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (10/19/2010)
A dSLR is always a better camera, hands-down. Panasonic makes excellent superzooms, and if you want as close as you'll come to a dSLR experience with a fixed-lens camera, go with the FZ100. Your budget limits your choices however. I think you'll be happier with a dSLR -- picture quality is so much better.
reply to this comment
which camera (jeanette Mundhenk — 10/09/2010)
Has anyone seen or played with the new sony a55 yet? and how does it compare to the canon t2i? still trying to decide. Thanks in advance
reply to this comment
t2i lense suggestion (greg — 10/07/2010)
What lense would you suggest for the t2i? the review suggest getting a better lense.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (10/08/2010)
Sigma is making some great lenses for the money right now and if you're on a budget, you can get more bang for your buck. I would look at an 18-200 zoom, or at the least 18-135 or thereabouts.
reply to this comment
michicutest (10/09/2010)
Is 18-200 better than 18-300?
reply to this comment
michicutest (10/10/2010)
So does that mean that Sigma lenses are of good quality? I noticed that they are a lot cheaper and that they are made of metal? whereas a nikon lens is made of plastic... is that true? Does it last long?
reply to this comment
michicutest (10/03/2010)
I am torn between Nikon - 12.3-Megapixel D90 Digital SLR Camera - Black with 18-105mm AF-S DX Nikkor lens, or The Canon EOS Rebel T2i digital SLR camera and EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 image-stabilized zoom lens and a Canon 55-250mm f/4-5.6 telephoto zoom lens or Nikon D5000DX 12.3MP Digital SLR Camera with Extra Zoom Lens that includes the camera, an 18-55mm lens and an extra Nikon 55-200mm Vibration Reduction zoom lens. All of which fall on my budget. I just need to know which one is the best deal since the three are almost of the same price/ only $100 difference.
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (10/04/2010)
All three are excellent cameras, but out of the three deals you mentioned, if you can get the T2i with those two lenses, that sounds like a great deal.
reply to this comment
michicutest (10/09/2010)
I just saw the nikon d3100. It almost has the same features as t2i. It seems like it is a good camera. Should I buy that instead? It also comes with 2 lenses and a lot of people told me I should buy nikon and invest on some good lenses instead of buying canon. What d you think?
reply to this comment
alex essert (10/30/2010)
best afforable dslr camera
reply to this comment
which Nikon dSLR? (Molly — 10/01/2010)
What dSLR Nikon camera model do you recommend for someone who is semi-knowledgeable about shooting, can rely on autofocus if/when needed, and can't spend more than $5-600.00?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (10/02/2010)
Well that's a tough price point but you may get into a d60 if you can find them.
reply to this comment
Need comparison (Joe — 09/13/2010)
Canon Rebel XS and Pentax X90....how do they compare overall and how do they compare re macro capabilities? THANKS!
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (09/13/2010)
Two totally different cameras. The XS is a dSLR, the X90 is a super zoom, and not a particularly strong one at that. dSLR photo quality is light years beyond anything you'd get form a superzoom, though superzooms are more versatile out of the box, considering the huge zoom lenses. Check out this article we have on the subject:
digitalcamera-hq.com/articl...
reply to this comment
digitalcamera-hq.com/articl...
best camera for airline pilot (Bhanu — 09/19/2010)
suggest me a camera which suits my profession(pilot) and easy to carry to all places. photography is my long cherished dream.
reply to this comment
Which Nikon to buy (Shipper — 09/08/2010)
I am considering a D-90, D3100 or D5000 purchase. I currently have an 8 year old D-70 and would like to move up, mainly to take sports pictures. Is there one of these products that is heads and tails better than the others? Or should I just purchase the Canon T2i? Is there anyone out there that has high level (photography) experience that could comment objectively?
Thanks
reply to this comment
Thanks
Chris Weigl (09/09/2010)
The D90 is the most advanced of the bunch you have listed, with 11 focus points and a 4.5 fps shooting. It also includes NIkon's 3D focus tracking and very good Dynamic Area AF. You may also want to look at the recently announced Sony A55, which shoots at a whopping 10fps and uses a Pellicle mirror. Still, you already own a Nikon and should probably stick with the brand.
reply to this comment
I have babies- no time to learn the skill yet. (Jennifer — 09/06/2010)
I was given my friend's old camera (He is a pro videographer) it is a Canon EOS 650. I have the flash, filters and lenses as well. I want a new DSLR camera, but would like to know if the equipment that came with his old camera is useable with a good DSLR that I may buy now? I don't care too much about video and am NOT techno savy but want really good photo quality to photograph my newborn and 1 year old as they grow up. Price point is not too much of an issue if under $1000.I read the T2i review that recommends T1i for people who don't want to fiddle with adjustments. I am just over my head in figuring out one from another and really only want to point and shoot at this point. Please recommend something!
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (09/08/2010)
I remember selling those in college back in the day. Nice camera. The lenses are EF compatible, and as such you'll be able to use them. And the T2i or T1i will be great in auto mode and allow you to grow into it.
One thing though. Both the T1 and T2 aren't full frame, so the focal length may be off as you shoot with the 650 lenses.
reply to this comment
One thing though. Both the T1 and T2 aren't full frame, so the focal length may be off as you shoot with the 650 lenses.
Jennifer (10/26/2010)
You said "One thing though. Both the T1 and T2 aren't full frame, so the focal length may be off as you shoot with the 650 lenses." I do not understand what this means. really NOT techno savy! and what is EF? any other recommendations, or just these two?
reply to this comment
Shankar (09/06/2010)
how is the sony dSLR A 350? can i go in for it?
reply to this comment
owner (Rebecca Starr Designs — 09/03/2010)
how about the new streamlined sony body mini slr???? i love, love the color of slr's that is distinctive..but really want a compact.. should i wait a little longer or what do you think about sony or olympus? price does matter but in it for the long haul.many thanks....
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (09/07/2010)
Those NEX cameras you're referring to aren't really dSLRs -- they're mirrorless cameras, so the image quality is close to a dSLR, they're small cameras, but they're a bit slower to perform. We haven't reviewed the Sony NEX cameras, but I did just post a review of the Olympus PEN E-PL1 which I had a great time with -- if small size and a cool look are important to you, this is an excellent model.
reply to this comment
Advice on DSLR Lens (RM — 09/03/2010)
Hi,
Got my self a Canon Rebel XS. It came with 18-55mm IS Lens. However, this lens isnt so great for zoom shots. Need advise on upgrades for my lens.
Thnx
reply to this comment
Got my self a Canon Rebel XS. It came with 18-55mm IS Lens. However, this lens isnt so great for zoom shots. Need advise on upgrades for my lens.
Thnx
by James DeRuvo (09/08/2010)
I'm not really sure what you mean. I've used that zoom and it works just fine for zooms within that focal length. If you want something further out, Canon does have an 18-200mm zoom. I have it on the 7D and it works fantastic for it's price. It's just important to understand that the farther out the focal length is, the slower the lens gets.
reply to this comment
Barbara Ruggiero (08/31/2010)
Hi James,
I too am looking to get into DSLR. Main concerns: I have two girls that play soccer and will do family (indoor) and beach photos. Also have old cannon lenses (1985-90) will any of these still work? Was leaning towards the 2Ti or is that too much camera for my needs/budget?
Thanks,
Barbara
reply to this comment
I too am looking to get into DSLR. Main concerns: I have two girls that play soccer and will do family (indoor) and beach photos. Also have old cannon lenses (1985-90) will any of these still work? Was leaning towards the 2Ti or is that too much camera for my needs/budget?
Thanks,
Barbara
Nikon lenses (Murray — 08/28/2010)
Do Nikon dSLR's accept older SLR Nikon lenses?
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (08/30/2010)
Yep, most of the time they do -- that's one of the best features of the Nikon system. You'll run into some compatibility issues here and there, but for the most part, they'll work. Here's a compatibility chart so you can see if you'll run into any issues:
kenrockwell.com/nikon/compa...
reply to this comment
kenrockwell.com/nikon/compa...
satyan israni (08/25/2010)
hi
i currently own a point and shoot digicam and a nikon f60 slr. i want to upgrade to an entry level dslr. what do i go for? i cannot afford beyond 600USD. i was told that canon eos 1000d is better than nikon d3000. do the old lenses of slrs mount on the dslrs? if that is so then i cud go for nikon and then wat would be ur advice. thnks.. i think u can figure im really confused. one more thing, i want to use my dslr for sports photography (F1) and for landscapes.. thanks.. rgds.. satyan israni(Mumbai, India)
reply to this comment
i currently own a point and shoot digicam and a nikon f60 slr. i want to upgrade to an entry level dslr. what do i go for? i cannot afford beyond 600USD. i was told that canon eos 1000d is better than nikon d3000. do the old lenses of slrs mount on the dslrs? if that is so then i cud go for nikon and then wat would be ur advice. thnks.. i think u can figure im really confused. one more thing, i want to use my dslr for sports photography (F1) and for landscapes.. thanks.. rgds.. satyan israni(Mumbai, India)
by James DeRuvo (08/26/2010)
I'd stay in the nikon family since you have lenses already. Fact is, it's pretty much a horse race between the two platforms. But I think that Nikon has the edge because it can use lenses dating back over 50 years. Moving platforms means starting over and you wno't be able to do that under $600.
reply to this comment
New To The SLR World (Tim — 08/24/2010)
James, how are you? I have a budget of $1500.00 and would like to purchase my first SLR camera. I am leaning torwards the Ti2. My questions is (lens) - which to purchase that will provide the best overall flexibility for various shooting situations. I have a 5 and 2 year old so action shots, sports etc.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (08/25/2010)
The T2i is a nice way in, Tim. It's essentially the 7D with only one processor and a lighter body. THere's a few other differences, but yeah, I'd go with the T2i if your looking for an entry level DSLR.
reply to this comment
JoAnn Doherty (08/22/2010)
Please help me decide- I am new to the entry level SLR cameras. I am trying to choose between a Sony A500, a Nikon 5100 or a Canon Rebel T1. I am testing the Sony a500 right now. I am primarily looking for a camera for sports events - large fields like football, etc. with poor lighting. I also really wanted to purchase the camera from Wolf camera because of the service and classes. However, Wolf doesn't carry Canon. Any thoughts or comments would be appreciated.
reply to this comment
Chris Weigl (08/23/2010)
I'm assuming you mean the Nikon D5000? What you really should look at is the lenses you'll need to buy after you purchase the camera. For low-light sports, especially something like football, most use expensive and fast zooms or primes that cost far more than the camera body. You could get a 70-300 or equivalent f4-5.6 zoom, but the f5.6 will really be limiting in anything but broad daylight. Price out what you're willing to spend and decide from there which manufacturer provides what you're looking for.
As a guide, you'll want at least a 300mm lens to shoot sports, preferably at least f4 for lower light. Nikon and Canon both sell a 300f4 for $1200, or you could look into getting a 70-200 2.8 and adding a 1.4x teleconverter. Either way, things will get expensive.
reply to this comment
As a guide, you'll want at least a 300mm lens to shoot sports, preferably at least f4 for lower light. Nikon and Canon both sell a 300f4 for $1200, or you could look into getting a 70-200 2.8 and adding a 1.4x teleconverter. Either way, things will get expensive.
Want Dslr (need for all around shooting incl beach to water surf shots) (CJ — 08/19/2010)
Could go through a bunch of details but bottom line: buy a T2i or wait just a bit for Nikon to release a D5100 (or D90 replacement)? Also, what lens for quality photos + versatility? 18-200?
reply to this comment
Chris Weigl (08/19/2010)
What exactly are you waiting for in a replacement camera? Nikon just released the d3100 with no news about a d5000 replacement or d90 replacement. The best camera is the one you have... As for your lens dilemma, the quality and versatility are usually inversely proportional. The 18-200's are fine but none are stellar. I'd recommend looking at something a little more moderate, like the Sigma 17-70, Canon 15-85, or Nikon 16-85.
reply to this comment
CJ (08/19/2010)
Yes, Very good point (bird in the hand concept) but didn’t want my orig. question to be like War and Peace so it was hard to get simplified w/o losing a little of the point. I/we have:
• Canon AE-1 Program (for me)
• Panasonic DMC-FZ8 (for sporting events –SLRs are not allowed in Coliseum)
• Canon SD400 (point and shoot for vacations and the wife)
In our 40s and the wife is small and has poor vision so a DSLR would take great photos for me, and decent photos for her (who can’t focus – but wants to photograph me from shore when I surf, etc) I will also be buying a new point and shoot to replace the SD400 so keeping in mind the importance of the fact that you keep an SLR for years and are stuck with lenses; makes the research and decision…Very Important. Wanted a Leica until wife came along and then Nikon for years after but the offering has to be simple enough & small body enough for her and still good quality or it will fall into the “never gets taken and used” category.
*I liked the D90 but it was too large in her hands, She liked the Canon T1 and the Nikon D5000 but there were a few things both of us thought that would improve with a next model.
reply to this comment
• Canon AE-1 Program (for me)
• Panasonic DMC-FZ8 (for sporting events –SLRs are not allowed in Coliseum)
• Canon SD400 (point and shoot for vacations and the wife)
In our 40s and the wife is small and has poor vision so a DSLR would take great photos for me, and decent photos for her (who can’t focus – but wants to photograph me from shore when I surf, etc) I will also be buying a new point and shoot to replace the SD400 so keeping in mind the importance of the fact that you keep an SLR for years and are stuck with lenses; makes the research and decision…Very Important. Wanted a Leica until wife came along and then Nikon for years after but the offering has to be simple enough & small body enough for her and still good quality or it will fall into the “never gets taken and used” category.
*I liked the D90 but it was too large in her hands, She liked the Canon T1 and the Nikon D5000 but there were a few things both of us thought that would improve with a next model.
550D or 7D (Mehmet — 08/06/2010)
I have Canon 400D. Is it worth to upgrade to 550D? Or wait to buy a 7D?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (08/07/2010)
I'd go with the 7D. It has two DIGIC IV processors working in tandem to process the image files.
reply to this comment
Tommy (08/04/2010)
Hello people. I am currently looking for a DSLR camera with my main focus being music videos. What is a good camera for this? I looked at the Canon 7D and the T2i. Would I do better with getting a T2i with a better lense?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (08/05/2010)
The 7D uses dual DIGIC IV processors for a better image. If you can afford it, I'd go with the 7D. Not to say that the T2i isn't a good camera, it is. If you're on a budget, then maybe going with the lesser body now and a better lens will serve your immediate needs until you can afford to upgrade.
You can make up a great deal with proper lighting anyway.
reply to this comment
You can make up a great deal with proper lighting anyway.
Lou Nachman (08/04/2010)
I enjoyed the Pentax K-x review. I'm considering a Pentax K-7 with 16 gb/class 10 card for school use(presentations/short video) since I can shoot manual with my 40 yr. old Takumar lens that are in beautiful shape. The body seems to be built ruggedly and reviews have been consistently good. I have no desire for a Canon or Nikon due to size/cost and a loyalty to my old Spotmatic II. I will probably be doing very little low light. Your suggestions in this price range?
reply to this comment
minolta lenses which camera help? (jeanette Mundhenk — 08/03/2010)
I have Minolta Maxxum leses also, How does the alpha 550 do, considering this or the Nikon D5000. I have horses I like to shoot as well as regular everyday things. Ready to take the step up but don't want a budget breaker. Thanks
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (08/04/2010)
If you want to use your lenses, chances are you'll only be able to in manual. Maybe some limited auto functions, but probably just focus. I prefer the Nikon even if you have to buy lenses for it.
reply to this comment
another question (jeanette Mundhenk — 08/06/2010)
Thanks for you reply, so now I have another question. What would you choose between the Nikon 5000 or the new Canon T2i? Like I stated previously we have horses so action shots are important and my son likes to surf. What zoom lens would you recommend? I have seen good things about both. I did just get a nice video camera so that is not a priority. Thanks again
reply to this comment
can someone help me out with this? (john — 07/28/2010)
how much does a sony digital still camera run?Model number mvcfd100
reply to this comment
Chris Weigl (07/29/2010)
That camera's worth next to nothing at this point, possibly $40.
reply to this comment
question (Al Taylor — 07/28/2010)
will my zoom lens from my old film slr work on a digital slr?
Thank you
reply to this comment
Thank you
Chris Weigl (07/28/2010)
Depends on how old the lens is and what kind of digital SLR.
reply to this comment
Michael Babjeck (07/27/2010)
I am not sure which camera would be the best to buy. I am new at DSLR but I have a lot of knowledge in cameras. I am looking at the Nikon D5000 and the new Cannon T2i/500D. I would like to know which one to buy, and why? Thank you for your time.
reply to this comment
Chris Weigl (07/29/2010)
Look at the system rather than just the camera. Compare which lenses you may buy and decide which are within your budget or fit your needs. Remember, you'll probably upgrade the camera again at some point but you're stuck with the system.
reply to this comment
Camera Help (Maeve — 07/19/2010)
If you could pick ANY SLR camera for any price, which would it be? Thanks!
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (07/20/2010)
Nikon D3s. A smooth $5,000. Absolutely crushes in low light. Start saving!
reply to this comment
Beginner (leslie — 07/18/2010)
I am a beginner and am interested in buying a dSLR camera for fun that I can grow into. What would you suggest?
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (07/19/2010)
Pentax K-x or Canon XSi at the lower end. If you can spend a bit more, Nikon D5000. The one you choose now predestines what you might use in the future, because once you start a lens collection, it's appealing to stay with the same brand. Head to a camera shop, take some time to try out different once to see which one feels the most "natural" in your hands -- that accounts for a lot.
reply to this comment
Better Lens or Better Camera for the beginner? (Dr K Banerjee — 07/17/2010)
I'm on the lookout for an entry level dSLR. Should I go for a choice between:
a) Nikon D90/Canon 50D/550D with kit lens (which of these 3 is more versatile?) or a choice between: b) Nikon D5000/Canon 500D(body only) with additional lens?
My budget is $ 1200. Video is not a priority; high quality still shots, in most conditions, are. I would very much appreciate a well explained reply.
Thank you
reply to this comment
a) Nikon D90/Canon 50D/550D with kit lens (which of these 3 is more versatile?) or a choice between: b) Nikon D5000/Canon 500D(body only) with additional lens?
My budget is $ 1200. Video is not a priority; high quality still shots, in most conditions, are. I would very much appreciate a well explained reply.
Thank you
by James DeRuvo (07/21/2010)
Well, Nikon and Canon seems almost neck and neck to me. Both outstanding camera platforms. Great lenses. And when you're looking at DSLRs, it's important to think more platform. Save money on the body now and get a better lens. Then, when you're ready to upgrade, you can boost the body and use the same lenses. So I think it's really a tossup. I'm a Canon man, but I do see that Nikon's biggest advantage is the lens mount, which hasn't changed in 50 years. So that means you can use a wide variety of 35mm films lenses, even if they're on manual only. Hope that helps.
reply to this comment
Advise on lens please! (Dr Kallol Banerjee — 08/10/2010)
Thanks for your comprehensive advise. Took my time to reply. Checked out all of the above models with different experienced owners/users. Realised there's not much difference for a beginner like me. Will take years to master their full potential anyways. Am going in for the 550D with kit lens. Floored by it's video. If used cleverly, especially avoiding the highest definition for fast action shots & with a good IS+USM lens, one can't tell the difference from a camcorder. Can you please advise about the add-on lens? Am considering EFS 55~250 IS f/4.0~5.6 or EF 70~300 IS f/4.0~5.6 USM. The former appears good enough for me & is much cheaper, but without the USM will it be ok for videos? (am buying add on mic & tripod too). The latter, I believe, should be good for any future upgrade to full frame camera. Is there any thing else I should consider? Thanks once again.
reply to this comment
Help needed to buy a dSLR in India. (priya — 07/06/2010)
I live in India. I have the following requirements :
1. I wish to buy a dSLR with good specifications that I can use during travel to photograph landscapes and do some distant/close range photographs like wild flora and fauna etc.wherever I go. Not into video.
2. I want to learn and get to know what can be done on the camera that I buy,instead of upgrading the body i would want to add accessories like lenses.
3. I would like to go for something that is not too entry level and yet do not want to end up spending a fortune on it.
4. My limited amateurish research boils down to Nikon D5000, Olympus E620, Canon Rebel T2i.
5. My questions :
Should I go for a brand that gives me maximum accessories bundled with the camera?
What camera would still satisfy me once I have learnt the ropes well enough?
reply to this comment
1. I wish to buy a dSLR with good specifications that I can use during travel to photograph landscapes and do some distant/close range photographs like wild flora and fauna etc.wherever I go. Not into video.
2. I want to learn and get to know what can be done on the camera that I buy,instead of upgrading the body i would want to add accessories like lenses.
3. I would like to go for something that is not too entry level and yet do not want to end up spending a fortune on it.
4. My limited amateurish research boils down to Nikon D5000, Olympus E620, Canon Rebel T2i.
5. My questions :
Should I go for a brand that gives me maximum accessories bundled with the camera?
What camera would still satisfy me once I have learnt the ropes well enough?
Liam McCabe (07/06/2010)
The Nikon D5000 and Canon T2i are both great. Video is the big selling point with the T2i, though the image quality is a bit sharper than the D5000 too -- it does cost more though. D5000 is a fine camera. You can always buy more accessories later, but I mean if you can get a great deal on a bundle, then go for it. I can't say which camera you'd be happiest with, because it's really a matter of personal preference -- both the D5000 and T2i are excellent, so if you can find a way to try one out for yourself, at least hold it in your hand, then you might get a better feel for which one you prefer.
reply to this comment
Opinion (Claudia — 07/06/2010)
I want to buy a good SLR camera easy to use, but good quality of picture
I was thinking about Olympus E-620
any coments on this?
reply to this comment
I was thinking about Olympus E-620
any coments on this?
by James DeRuvo (07/06/2010)
I think you can do better. Olympus makes fine cameras, but Canon and Nikon are at the top of the food chain in the DSLR world. And they come with HD video capability as well. Try the Canon T2i.
reply to this comment
Opinion (Claudia — 07/06/2010)
James,
thanks for your opinion. How about the Canon T1i versus T2i
I really like the reviews on T2i. I am just a little concerned about its size. Any options for a good quality camera like T2i but less bulky? and easy to use! or you think the T2i is still my best choice?
reply to this comment
thanks for your opinion. How about the Canon T1i versus T2i
I really like the reviews on T2i. I am just a little concerned about its size. Any options for a good quality camera like T2i but less bulky? and easy to use! or you think the T2i is still my best choice?
Pentax k-x (wksoh — 07/01/2010)
Pentax K-x has HD video as well and screw drive motor that T2i does not have..
reply to this comment
Graphic Designer..needing help with DSLR camera options between Nikon and Canon (jay — 06/29/2010)
Hello Every1 I'm a graphic designer who has an eye for photography. I dont want a beginners camera, I just want one thatll last for a while and wanted to choose between NIKON or CANON. I still dont know which series of either company to purchase, but i would aslo like to stay in the range of $800 or less. I also wanted versatility and options with different lenses.
ive read many of the feedbacks but every1 keeps saying for beginers get this camera and profess. get another. I just want i guess the pro camera to be able to walk before i crawl (save some money and time basically). PLEASE HELP ME OUT thanks.
reply to this comment
ive read many of the feedbacks but every1 keeps saying for beginers get this camera and profess. get another. I just want i guess the pro camera to be able to walk before i crawl (save some money and time basically). PLEASE HELP ME OUT thanks.
by James DeRuvo (06/29/2010)
Well for a DSLR, you'll be hard pressed to get under $1000 with the lens. I'd recommend saving for a few months longer and getting the Canon T2i with a good 28-105, or there abouts, zoom lens. Cost is around $1100.
For your price point, you may want to look on clearance or used for a Canon XSi.
reply to this comment
For your price point, you may want to look on clearance or used for a Canon XSi.
Canon or Nikon DSLR? and is the quality of the images really going to be that much better? ( — 06/29/2010)
I currently have a Canon AE1 Programmable with a 28-105? zoom lense which also has a MACRO feature. I LOVE this camera and the quality of photos that I have had over the years, and the ability to take along 1 lense wherever I go. I use it for travel, flowers, people, etc. The reason that I am considering changing to a DSLR, is that I would like to not have to use a flash as much as digital seems to use the avaialble light much better than film. I am also told that when you take your memory card in for prints, that you will get better photos. I usually only print at 4x6. Is that true, will I notice a signifcant difference? Also I am able to look through a viewfinder with my existing Canon, which the Point and Shoots don't have, and I have a hard time in outdoor situations. I want to get a DSLR that has these choices avaialable. Do you think Canon or Nikon and what models and lenses do you recommend. Thanks!!! Laura
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (06/29/2010)
I don't think that's necessarily true. Low light is low light and it largely depends on how fast your lens is, what ISO you're using, etc. In a DSLR, if you're underexposed, you get noise. In film, you get grain. Same concept though.
As for which one, either makes great cameras and great lenses. Nikon has an advantage in that in manual you can use lenses dating back nearly 6 decades. But right now, my money is on Canon. Take a look at the T2i and the 7D, depending on your budget.
One thing though, you won't be able to use those old Canon lenses though as Canon changed their lens mounts when autofocus came back in the mid eighties.
reply to this comment
As for which one, either makes great cameras and great lenses. Nikon has an advantage in that in manual you can use lenses dating back nearly 6 decades. But right now, my money is on Canon. Take a look at the T2i and the 7D, depending on your budget.
One thing though, you won't be able to use those old Canon lenses though as Canon changed their lens mounts when autofocus came back in the mid eighties.
A bit more info I could use please ( — 06/29/2010)
Okay, so my current lense is a Canon Zoom Lens FD 35-105 1:3.5 (is this terminolgy the speed?) with a Macro Feature. If I am looking for a lense in Nikon or Canon and want to be able to get less Noise (or to use more available light), what kind of a lense would I be looking for?
And thanks for your great and quick response.
reply to this comment
And thanks for your great and quick response.
aari (06/29/2010)
sorry for asking question out of box.
i want to buy Fuji FinePix S1600...
it's ok??can all of you give opinion...
reply to this comment
i want to buy Fuji FinePix S1600...
it's ok??can all of you give opinion...
shop.ebay.in (Jamil Sayed — 06/26/2010)
In India, u may purchase safely in shop.ebay.in. Before placing your order, u should read the sellers feedback, the comments from other purchasers. Never pay through bank transfer. Always pay through "paypaisa" through credit/debit card.
reply to this comment
First dslr camera (Fiona — 06/24/2010)
Thanks James. I have been looking at this camera and it comes with a Canon EF 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS lens. For what I want I am going to need a macro lens also. An earlier comment indicated that old Nikon lenses will fit new Nikons... is this true and if so would this be a cheaper option? I am not sure I can justify another 600 for a macro lens.
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (06/25/2010)
Legacy lens support is one of the best features about Nikon, so yes, you can use your old Nikon lenses.
reply to this comment
A710IS or needing more? (Betty — 06/24/2010)
I am very amateur in photo taking, but have a Cannon A710IS. I miss a lot of good pictures due to a slow shutter speed. What should I be looking at getting into or am I missins something about this camera?
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (06/24/2010)
A camera like that will always have a long shutter lag, no way around it. You can make it a bit quicker by 'pre-focusing' -- hold the shutter halfway down so that it auto-focuses before you actually try to take the picture. That should help.
reply to this comment
Any recommendations (Betty — 06/26/2010)
To replace my Canon A710IS with something that will have a faster shutter and quicker recovery from using the flash, what should I look at camera wise. I wouldn't want to spend more than $500. I like to take photos of nature, animals and will soon become a grandma so will be taking pics of a new little one...
reply to this comment
Canon EOS 400D (Katie Margetts — 06/24/2010)
Hey, I'm thinking about purchasing a second hand Canon EOS 400D. Any comments, I have never owned an SLR camera and want to get into taking better pictures but am not sure if I should get something new rather than second hand. Reviews seem to be positive but most of them are from 2008/09.
Secondly, can someone help me out with choosing an inexpensive but good underwater camera and housing as I need one for my next holiday.
Thank you :-)
reply to this comment
Secondly, can someone help me out with choosing an inexpensive but good underwater camera and housing as I need one for my next holiday.
Thank you :-)
by James DeRuvo (06/24/2010)
The XTi was a great camera in it's day. I guess it depends on how much you can get it for. Thing is, the new T2i can do some much more including HD video. It may be worth saving for a few extra months and going new. But if it's in good condition and the price is right, it'll serve you well as an entry level DSLR.
As for underwater housings, et al - you can't beat Ikelite.
reply to this comment
As for underwater housings, et al - you can't beat Ikelite.
Fiona (06/23/2010)
I am looking to buy a new camera as an upgrade to my old Canon Pro1. I love taking macro photos but am also wanting a good zoom option as well. I am looking at either Nikon or Canon and spending up to 2000. There are an amazing amount of options but I am very confused, any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (06/24/2010)
I think the Canon 7D is a great compromise of picture quality and price. It gives you about 80% of what the 5D Mk. II gives you, but at nearly half the price.
reply to this comment
Unique camera usage (James — 06/19/2010)
I am looking for a dslr and lens combination to take close up pictures in horses mouths. (i am a veterinarian) Lighting can be an issue as these cameras always have the flash too far from the lens for me to get the lens and the flash in the mouth at the same time. Is there a ring flash and entry or pro level performence camera lens combination that anyone can sugest? This lens needs to be pretty durable/cleanable too.
reply to this comment
Unique camera usage (James — 06/19/2010)
I am looking for a dslr and lens combination to take close up pictures in horses mouths. (i am a veterinarian) Lighting can be an issue as these cameras always have the flash too far from the lens for me to get the lens and the flash in the mouth at the same time. Is there a ring flash and entry or pro level performence camera lens combination that anyone can sugest? This lens needs to be pretty durable/cleanable too.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (06/19/2010)
A ring flash is a good option. Search Amazon and you'll find several options. For your camera setup, I'd recommend the Canon T2i and either the 50mm macro or the various wide angle options which have the same macro feature.
reply to this comment
joseph kennedy (06/14/2010)
i think that i want to buy from thunder cameras a canon t2i package with a 17-85mm f/4-5.6 is usm autofocus lens and a 70-200mm f/2.8l usm autofocus lenscost is $2o59 after upgrading battery and chip shipping cost is $2574 he offered to trade "up" to a tamron 28-70 f/2.8 dg and a 70 200 f/2.8 di ld macro af lensis the tamron lens as good as canon? is thunder a good place to buy? i have read that canon is the best i am not sure what to do
reply to this comment
Chris Weigl (06/16/2010)
I don't know thunder personally so I can't help you there, but it seems like they're doing something screwy there. The Canon 70-200 is definitely a better lens than the Tamron due to its better focus motor. It's also a far more expensive lens so don't take his "deal". The 28-70 2.8 is a great lens and probably better than the 17-85, but what he doesn't tell you is that you lose some serious wide angle using that lens on a t2i. You would be much happier with the 17-85 despite it's slower speed. Just to set the record straight, Canon is not the "best". Every manufacturer excels in some areas and not in others, none are best for everything.
reply to this comment
Amy Long (06/12/2010)
Nikon D5000 is my dream camera. The ease of use and photo quality are wonderful.
reply to this comment
Canon SLR successor suggestions (CAphotoGUY — 06/12/2010)
I own 2 ancient Canon AE-1 SLR's in perfect condition with assorted lenses (I am the original purchaser; one of them I bought for my parents who since gave it back nearly unused). I have been hoping I could do something productive with them or there might be some kind of digital retrofit kit. Any suggestions?
Otherwise I am looking for an entry dSLR. Are these lenses still usable or do I need to start over.
I'm open to trying a good used model. I like nature telephoto and human photography.
Thanks!
reply to this comment
Otherwise I am looking for an entry dSLR. Are these lenses still usable or do I need to start over.
I'm open to trying a good used model. I like nature telephoto and human photography.
Thanks!
by James DeRuvo (06/16/2010)
Unfortuantely, now. The Canon DSLRs use an EF style lens which can't be used with the old F style lens of the AE1. You're best bet would be to list them on eBay and apply the cash you make towards the lenses you buy with that Canon T2i.
reply to this comment
Len Z (06/07/2010)
You should keep silent if you don't know the answer. D series lenses work fine, you just need to keep them set to minimum aperture to have full function.
reply to this comment
Lens use (Ron — 06/02/2010)
Based on your comment, "don't chase the camera body, chase the lens." I have 2 Minolta AF lens; Minolta Maxxum AF 28-80, and, Minolta Maxxum AF 70-210. Am wanting to get a quality DSLR that will accept my lens for a reasonable price. I would be considered a beginner/amature photographer wanting to upgrade from my 35mm SLR Minolta. Any good suggestions??
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (06/03/2010)
Well, you only have one choice, and that's the Sony Alpha series. Sony bought Minolta's camera business when they dropped out of the industry. I'd recommend the Alpha 900 as it'll also shoot in HD video. But it all depends on your budget.
reply to this comment
minolta lenses (T.J. Donegan — 06/11/2010)
If your cameras will mount on an Alpha series camera, you may want to wait for the NEX-3 or NEX-5 cameras which are coming out next month from Sony. They will utilize a new mount that is different from your minolta lenses, but the cameras sport a D-SLR sized sensor in a micro four/thirds body and will mount alpha lenses through the use of a $199 adapter.
The cameras will retail right around the $550-650 mark, so I'm not sure if that fits your needs price-wise. If that's a bit too much including the adapter you can opt for the A230 or A330 for entry-level prices that are falling fast as Sony's new line of cameras will begin to trickle out this Summer.
reply to this comment
The cameras will retail right around the $550-650 mark, so I'm not sure if that fits your needs price-wise. If that's a bit too much including the adapter you can opt for the A230 or A330 for entry-level prices that are falling fast as Sony's new line of cameras will begin to trickle out this Summer.
Nikon D80 vs D3000 (Peg Chaisson — 05/26/2010)
I have a Nikon D80 and am considering a D3000 (or 5000). Would this be an upgrade or are they very similar. I'm not interested in the video feature. Thank you. PC
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (05/27/2010)
They're essentially the same cameras. If you're not interested in the video feature, it's not much of an upgrade, certainly not worth spending the money for, IMHO.
reply to this comment
Lenses (Chandler — 05/25/2010)
I have a Film DSL cannon A1 with a cannon 50mm 1.4 lens
Now its way past due for a DSLR. Most of my photograpy will be standard distance and not using telephotos. I like the cannon T2 Rebel 18 Megpxls. However I hear the poor reviews on Cannons 50 mm 1.4 lens on auto settings. I thought fast low light would require a 1.4 lens. Should I consider a Nicon camera and there 50 mm 1.4 Lens?
reply to this comment
Now its way past due for a DSLR. Most of my photograpy will be standard distance and not using telephotos. I like the cannon T2 Rebel 18 Megpxls. However I hear the poor reviews on Cannons 50 mm 1.4 lens on auto settings. I thought fast low light would require a 1.4 lens. Should I consider a Nicon camera and there 50 mm 1.4 Lens?
by James DeRuvo (05/26/2010)
I'd get a zoom lens. No matter what brand you get. Both have great DSLR lines. But a 50mm just isn't that flexible for my liking.
reply to this comment
lenses (Chandler — 05/26/2010)
James thanks for your commentv on the Lens. However low light fast (1.4) was my priority asn a zoom lens dosnt fit my needs. I don't require the versitility of a zoom.
I shoot at short distances in low level light.
Im curious are there zooms for fast low lever light like the 1.4? Please note I mostly shoot on Auto.
reply to this comment
I shoot at short distances in low level light.
Im curious are there zooms for fast low lever light like the 1.4? Please note I mostly shoot on Auto.
low light zooms (TJ — 06/11/2010)
From my experience it depends on what subjects you're shooting. F/1.4 is extraordinarily difficult to focus with as your depth of field at maximum aperture is brutally thin, especially if you're shooting faces. If you're shooting objects that aren't in motion or for which you can take multiple exposures and then stack focus, F/1.4 primes are great value.
There are really no viable zooms below f/2.8 with the exception being some Olympus glass. Creating a lens with an aperture that large that is constant throughout the lens is very difficult.
Again, it depends on your application, as with anything, but the Canon 50mm f/1.8 is a phenomenal lens, will run you about $100 and doubles as a very able macro lens in addition to its sharpness. Is is the best lens in the world? no, but there's simply no better value.
reply to this comment
There are really no viable zooms below f/2.8 with the exception being some Olympus glass. Creating a lens with an aperture that large that is constant throughout the lens is very difficult.
Again, it depends on your application, as with anything, but the Canon 50mm f/1.8 is a phenomenal lens, will run you about $100 and doubles as a very able macro lens in addition to its sharpness. Is is the best lens in the world? no, but there's simply no better value.
Don't discount Zuiko lenses or Oly bang-for-buck! Zuikos are HIGH quality... (Jeff — 05/20/2010)
Obviously you've never actually compared a zuiko lens to a nikkor or you'd NEVER have thrown out such a baseless claim.
Regarding simple KIT lenses, the zuikos are fantastic- every bit the equal or superior to comparable nikon kits. As to higher end lenses (in case you're interested) the Zuiko 35-100 f2.0 SPANKS other lenses, the Zuiko 50 f2 is amazing, the 7-14mm, 11-22, 90-250 f2.8 and 300 f2.0 are also among the best in existence. Oh yes, the 12-60 is fantastic (and the 14-54 is no slouch either).
If you were going to make a VALID argument, you should have said "the best zuiko lenses are a bit pricey" or "Olympus bodies don't yet let you see the full quality of the lenses yet" and left it at that.
Then again, if you NEED a 70-200 or 600mm equivalent f2 (brightness- not DOF) then only ONE options exists.
Frankly, there are many other reasons to choose one brand over another that are legitimate- please do some homework to learn about those (e.g. the ultimate in low light performance is the D3s, Canikon accessories are easy to find, Pentax has lovely legacy primes, etc.).
reply to this comment
Regarding simple KIT lenses, the zuikos are fantastic- every bit the equal or superior to comparable nikon kits. As to higher end lenses (in case you're interested) the Zuiko 35-100 f2.0 SPANKS other lenses, the Zuiko 50 f2 is amazing, the 7-14mm, 11-22, 90-250 f2.8 and 300 f2.0 are also among the best in existence. Oh yes, the 12-60 is fantastic (and the 14-54 is no slouch either).
If you were going to make a VALID argument, you should have said "the best zuiko lenses are a bit pricey" or "Olympus bodies don't yet let you see the full quality of the lenses yet" and left it at that.
Then again, if you NEED a 70-200 or 600mm equivalent f2 (brightness- not DOF) then only ONE options exists.
Frankly, there are many other reasons to choose one brand over another that are legitimate- please do some homework to learn about those (e.g. the ultimate in low light performance is the D3s, Canikon accessories are easy to find, Pentax has lovely legacy primes, etc.).
by James DeRuvo (05/21/2010)
You can believe that. Fine. But looking at what the pros use, few stray from the Nikon or Canon lines.
And just because Nikkors are recommended over Olympus, doesn't mean Zuikos are bad lenses. But there's a reason why the pros choose Canon or Nikon.
reply to this comment
And just because Nikkors are recommended over Olympus, doesn't mean Zuikos are bad lenses. But there's a reason why the pros choose Canon or Nikon.
response directed at a singular comment of 4/29... (Jeff — 05/21/2010)
James,
It appears that my comments were not directly associated to the comments of yours as I was intending.
I was directly responding to your claim that "no way is a zuiko [lens] better than a nikkor" which was part of your response to a beginner looking at (evidently) entry-level dSLRs.
Sorry, I just couldn't let that categorical lens comment stand unchallenged (yes, I think the Oly BODIES are a bit behind the times in regards to ISO performance, FPS and video).
I do agree that Canon/Nikon have some killer camera bodies and for most people they offer a more advisable path (easier to find/buy/rent lenses & accessories, established upgrade path, greater likelihood of being able to share/swap equipment/advice with others as they're most likely to have C&N kit, etc).
Additionally, the Olympus offerings (non-micro) do NOT have video capabilities.
That being said, if someone I know is contemplating a Nikon D3000, I'd definitely steer them towards something like a E-620 if it looked like a 2-lens kit was all they'd ever use because of the bang-for-the-buck (swivel screen, live view, in body stabilization, mirror lock-up, dustbuster, etc.) however, if they could afford to spend a few hundred more $ or potentially would want to upgrade in the future - without a doubt, I'd steer them to various Canon or Nikon offerings. While I'm impressed with the K-x's ISO performance but Pentax ends up being a niche product like Olympus (great legacy glass, no FF upgrade path, slow AF, poor JPG rendering, etc) and I rarely recommend going Pentax unless someone has loads of old (higher quality) Pentax glass (I still use some on my Oly bodies via adapter).
Cheers.
reply to this comment
It appears that my comments were not directly associated to the comments of yours as I was intending.
I was directly responding to your claim that "no way is a zuiko [lens] better than a nikkor" which was part of your response to a beginner looking at (evidently) entry-level dSLRs.
Sorry, I just couldn't let that categorical lens comment stand unchallenged (yes, I think the Oly BODIES are a bit behind the times in regards to ISO performance, FPS and video).
I do agree that Canon/Nikon have some killer camera bodies and for most people they offer a more advisable path (easier to find/buy/rent lenses & accessories, established upgrade path, greater likelihood of being able to share/swap equipment/advice with others as they're most likely to have C&N kit, etc).
Additionally, the Olympus offerings (non-micro) do NOT have video capabilities.
That being said, if someone I know is contemplating a Nikon D3000, I'd definitely steer them towards something like a E-620 if it looked like a 2-lens kit was all they'd ever use because of the bang-for-the-buck (swivel screen, live view, in body stabilization, mirror lock-up, dustbuster, etc.) however, if they could afford to spend a few hundred more $ or potentially would want to upgrade in the future - without a doubt, I'd steer them to various Canon or Nikon offerings. While I'm impressed with the K-x's ISO performance but Pentax ends up being a niche product like Olympus (great legacy glass, no FF upgrade path, slow AF, poor JPG rendering, etc) and I rarely recommend going Pentax unless someone has loads of old (higher quality) Pentax glass (I still use some on my Oly bodies via adapter).
Cheers.
buying camera thru e-bay (TROYDON SCURVILLE — 05/13/2010)
Is it safe to make cameras purchases on e-bay,The bundle they offer seem great,how does it work, & would they ship it to India where I STAY -- PLEASE help me with this information
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (05/14/2010)
First thing is to make sure you pay attention to the seller's feedback ratings. And also remember that if it sounds too good to be true, it probably is. SHipping to India will also be pretty pricey.
reply to this comment
more specific please (TROYDON SCURVILLE — 05/14/2010)
some more clarification on the e-bay purchasing of cameras please
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (05/14/2010)
reply to this comment
shop.ebay.in (Jamil Sayed — 06/26/2010)
In India, u may purchase safely in shop.ebay.in. Before placing your order, u should read the sellers feedback, the comments from other purchasers. Never pay through bank transfer. Always pay through "paypaisa" through credit/debit card.
reply to this comment
Malar (05/12/2010)
I'm, looking for a good professional DSLR.I don't want to pay more for HD video.I want a good camera just for photo.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (05/14/2010)
Depends on your budget. UNder $2K, I'd go with the Canon 7D.
reply to this comment
Professional DSLR (Aru — 05/12/2010)
I lost my d50,i'm looking to buy a new DSLR professional level but don't wnat to spend more than $2000 what is the best available in market?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (05/14/2010)
The Canon 7D is your best bet for the money.
reply to this comment
WHICH CAMERA (TROYDON SCURVILLE — 05/11/2010)
Please help me decide which camera will be better 1)canon 50D or 2)nikon D90 to start my journey into the digital SLR FOR THE FIRST TIME
reply to this comment
Liam McCabe (05/11/2010)
I've heard more good things about the D90 than the 50D, to be honest. You should be happy with either, but I hear lots of good things about the D90.
reply to this comment
WHICH LENS (TROYDON SCURVILLE — 05/11/2010)
Please help me decide - With the canon D50 Digital SLR which lens is best suitable 1) Canon EF -S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS) 2)Canon EF 24-85mm f3.5-4.5 USM or 3)Canon EF 28-105mm.f/3.5-4.5 II USM. I would mainly be covering weddings & functions & also like to take good portraits.Can you also tell me if having the NORMAL Canon 50mm f/1.8 II will be useful as i have lots if experience working on the normal 500 mm lens in film format.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (05/13/2010)
I like the 28-105. Great portrait options there. Also, photographers seem to love that 50mm. I don't care for it, but it's a personal bias.
reply to this comment
lens choice (TROYDON SCURVILLE — 05/13/2010)
Is this also good for photographing groups & the crowds in the function , please reply
reply to this comment
Looking for a DSLR (Raj — 06/28/2010)
Hi James,
I extensively use an old Canon Powershot point & shoot camera and often have been handicapped at not being able to click at night/indoors or long shots. I am looking at a DSLR (XS, XSi or D5000) that I can use as a base to upgrade later on once I get a hang of DSLR. I dont mind spending relatively more (upto $850 say even for a T2i) as long as it is value for money in the long run. I own a Sony Handicam and hence donot need DSLR for the video.
Could you advise pls..
Raj
reply to this comment
I extensively use an old Canon Powershot point & shoot camera and often have been handicapped at not being able to click at night/indoors or long shots. I am looking at a DSLR (XS, XSi or D5000) that I can use as a base to upgrade later on once I get a hang of DSLR. I dont mind spending relatively more (upto $850 say even for a T2i) as long as it is value for money in the long run. I own a Sony Handicam and hence donot need DSLR for the video.
Could you advise pls..
Raj
seeking advice from those who know more (Babs Noelle — 05/05/2010)
I have a newbie question. I have a great light set-up for photographing jewelry, but it's time for me to switch to a dSLR with autofocus. Any suggestions for camera as pertains specifically to such macro-photography? I will NOT be taking photos professionally (for publication), but DO want slick photos for the upcoming ecommerce component of my website.
If you check out my website, you'll know that my standards are high, even for web photos. But the photos WILL be done by a non-pro, with hopefully an easily replicated setup every time.
So much thanks in advance,
Babs Noelle
www.alarajewelry.com
reply to this comment
If you check out my website, you'll know that my standards are high, even for web photos. But the photos WILL be done by a non-pro, with hopefully an easily replicated setup every time.
So much thanks in advance,
Babs Noelle
www.alarajewelry.com
by James DeRuvo (05/06/2010)
The Canon T2i is a good solid entry level DSLR which will enable you to do the job.
reply to this comment
On Macro (Clovis — 10/22/2010)
Good macro shots don't always require an SLR.High-quality compacts can be very convenient and impressive in their macro shots (at low ISO). I personally use a LX3 and a G11 which allow for poster-size prints of macro subjects.
reply to this comment
Kay (05/03/2010)
I have a slew of old SLR Olympus lenses. Is there a dSLR that will use these old lenses? I am looking at Nikon D90, D5000 or the Canon T2i/550D
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (05/03/2010)
None of those will without an adapter which will 1) slow down the lens and b) cause clarity issues and 3) you'll only use on manual. You can go with Olympus DSLRs to keep it in the family. But you're right to look at the Nikon and Canon brands.
Why not just sell them on eBay and apply the cash to what you really want?
reply to this comment
Why not just sell them on eBay and apply the cash to what you really want?
camera comparison (Ron Stupka — 04/28/2010)
how does the sony A220/a230 compare toyour recommended picks
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (04/29/2010)
It's okay. It's really just a redesigned Minolta. I'd prefer Canon and Nikon.
reply to this comment
Carol (04/27/2010)
Any comments or suggestions on entry level DSLR? I am comparing the Nikon d5000 & Olympus E620 on advice from a 'sales person'. The sales pitch is that Olympus has the better lenses. Are they correct?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (04/29/2010)
Nikon, hands down. And I can tell you from being the "sales person" that he's steering you towards Olympus because he probably gets a better commission/spiff on it. There's no way a Zuiko lens is better than a Nikkor. NO WAY. And that he chose to omit Canon is telling. He probably gets NO spiff on that.
The real choice, is the Canon T21 and the 5000D. The T2i has HD video though ... quite tempting.
reply to this comment
The real choice, is the Canon T21 and the 5000D. The T2i has HD video though ... quite tempting.
Lane Doiron (04/21/2010)
I am in the market for a DSLR camera...comparing several and need a recommendation. The Canon T2i, the Nikon D90 or Pentax KX...OR have I left out one that would be better than these listed?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (04/22/2010)
I remember my first SLR ... a Pentax. It was great. But really, the two top cameras are Canon and Nikon. And both the T2i and D90 have HD video. The Nikon does have the edge with legacy lens support (you can use any Nikkor lens for the last 50 years), but I think the T2i has a better HD video.
reply to this comment
Linda McCreary (04/20/2010)
What does dSLR stand for??
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (04/22/2010)
Digital Single Lens Reflex. For more information, check out wiki at - en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digit...
reply to this comment
linda (04/15/2010)
what is the difference between the nikon d60 and the 3000 and 5000 series
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (04/15/2010)
The 3000 and 5000 series are entry level DSLRs.
reply to this comment
NIKON VS CANON (GB MIAMI — 04/14/2010)
I Have used both, and anyone who tells you one brand is better than the other does not know photography, once you step to the D90 level of above of the nikons and the d50 or above of the canon, there is NOTHING that one camera wont do for photos over the other. I stayes with nikon and sold all of canon because the lenses that i needed were better suited by nikon, dont chase cameras, chase lenses, a good lens will actually go up in price after time. Go to the store and actually hold both and see how they feel. Nikon tends to place more options on the outside while canon at this level will place options in the menus. To actually start off, why not purchased used from ebay a D70 or rebel for 200 dollars and spend the other 700 on a great pair of lenses, the pictures will actually come out better.
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (04/14/2010)
Agreed!
reply to this comment
D90 VS 550D..... (orionBANGLA — 04/12/2010)
NIKON D90 OR CANON 550D?????
WHICH ONE IS PERFECT TO START??
reply to this comment
WHICH ONE IS PERFECT TO START??
by James DeRuvo (04/14/2010)
Slip a coin. They're both outstanding cameras.
reply to this comment
dslr to start (gb Miami — 04/14/2010)
you can start with either one, keep in mind that once you buy one brand you most likely stick with it for a long time. nikon is a lens company that makes cameras while canon is the opposite. both are great, keep in mind that canon advertises more so don't give in to the hype. another reason I switched to nikon is because their cheap 100 to 150 dollar lens options are far better suited to my starting need for example nikon 18-55 lens with VR and 55-200 with VR blows away anything canon offers at this price range. read Ken Rockwell website and please reas his sections on aperture and how to compose pictures, it's not about the camera.. if you don't care about the video part of the camera and are looking for pics only then it does not matter, "important" canon as a marketing ploy tweaks their internal settings to make the rebel colors look brighter, nikon tries to give you a more raw look to give you the power of tweaking your pics to your liking, all of these can be done in Photoshop later.
reply to this comment
asmar fahad (04/11/2010)
After point and shoot I m going to take a dslr...i wanna be serious with photography. I found some models such as rebel t1i, rebel t2i and nikon d5000...
Please help me to select one... I need a all-roundar... So waiting for u.
reply to this comment
Please help me to select one... I need a all-roundar... So waiting for u.
by James DeRuvo (04/14/2010)
The T2i is a great way to go for an entry level DSLR. It not only gives you the basic set, but also HD video. Save money with an entry level body and invest it in better quality lenses. Then get a better body down the road.
reply to this comment
priority in selection (troydon — 04/08/2010)
by troydon scurville
which would be better in terms of cost & performance nikon d90 or canon 50d or the canon 550d
reply to this comment
which would be better in terms of cost & performance nikon d90 or canon 50d or the canon 550d
Liam McCabe (04/08/2010)
The 550d would be the top-performing camera of that bunch. The D90 is also a great option.
reply to this comment
NIKON VS CANON (GB MIAMI — 04/14/2010)
I Have used both, and anyone who tells you one brand is better than the other does not know photography, once you step to the D90 level of above of the nikons and the d50 or above of the canon, there is NOTHING that one camera wont do for photos over the other. I stayes with nikon and sold all of canon because the lenses that i needed were better suited by nikon, dont chase cameras, chase lenses, a good lens will actually go up in price after time. Go to the store and actually hold both and see how they feel. Nikon tends to place more options on the outside while canon at this level will place options in the menus. To actually start off, why not purchased used from ebay a D70 or rebel for 200 dollars and spend the other 700 on a great pair of lenses, the pictures will actually come out better.
reply to this comment
DSLR w Video Capabilities, Easy to use, Not too bulky (Karisa — 04/08/2010)
I would like a DSLR - my husband has a Nikon and all the lenses. I am not as "pro-like." We are having triplets so I want something that will be fast to grab the moments and offer an easy to use video camera. After doing research, I am stuck between Nikon D90, Canon 550D, Canon 7D, or Lumix GH1 - thoughts? Suggestions?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (04/08/2010)
I'd stay in the family, chiefly because you can use your husband's lenses no matter how old they are. You go outside that and you're spending money you don't really need to. Unless your hubby doesn't want to share that is, then I'd suggest the 7D. But go with the D90 and enjoy the HD video to boot.
reply to this comment
Comparable DSLR v Olympus C750 (Lesley Dale — 04/06/2010)
I am currently using an Olympus c750 and like all the features especially the zoom and get annoyed with the shutter delay, the size is also great as it can fit in a handbag. I would like something with inbuilt GPS, maybe wishful thinking and at least as many features and zoom. As I have 7 XD cards I was thinking to go with Olympus again but could easily be swayed to another brand. I also have a couple of K-mount (I think) lenses from a Ricoh SLR could you tell me if any of these can be used on any DSLR's.Thank you
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (04/07/2010)
It's a common problem with point and shoot cameras. But there are ways to combat it.
1. Prefocus. Hold down the shutter half way to get a prefocus of the image you're shooting. When it changes, prefocus again. This will speed up your camera's performance during picture taking since it won't have to autofocus before it shoots the shot.
2. Use faster SD cards. Yes, there are faster cards and it does make a difference in writing the image file to the card. This is especially key if you're taking multiple or burst images.
3. Fresher batteries. Use alkalines at least. But I recommend using high energy batteries designed for digital photography. Varta is a good brand. They are usually sold in camera shops, are long lasting (because they are sold in small quantities) put out alot of energy.
4. Pan with the action. You can create some pretty cool shots by panning with your shot, focusing on your subject. This will create the effect of your subject in sharp contrast to the blurry background.
6. Stick with 100-400 ISO. Going higher will cause more noise/grain in your shots, particularly in darker settings.
Doing these, particularly prefocusing and panning with the action will cut your shutter lag by as much as 80%.
K Mounts points you to Pentax. They should work, although probably on manual.
reply to this comment
It's a common problem with point and shoot cameras. But there are ways to combat it.
1. Prefocus. Hold down the shutter half way to get a prefocus of the image you're shooting. When it changes, prefocus again. This will speed up your camera's performance during picture taking since it won't have to autofocus before it shoots the shot.
2. Use faster SD cards. Yes, there are faster cards and it does make a difference in writing the image file to the card. This is especially key if you're taking multiple or burst images.
3. Fresher batteries. Use alkalines at least. But I recommend using high energy batteries designed for digital photography. Varta is a good brand. They are usually sold in camera shops, are long lasting (because they are sold in small quantities) put out alot of energy.
4. Pan with the action. You can create some pretty cool shots by panning with your shot, focusing on your subject. This will create the effect of your subject in sharp contrast to the blurry background.
6. Stick with 100-400 ISO. Going higher will cause more noise/grain in your shots, particularly in darker settings.
Doing these, particularly prefocusing and panning with the action will cut your shutter lag by as much as 80%.
K Mounts points you to Pentax. They should work, although probably on manual.
Minolta Lenses (Arnie Colon — 04/04/2010)
I have a camera bag full of Minolta Maxxum lenses. Is any DSLR preferable for use with my old Minolta glass? Are there pitfalls for which I should be aware?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (04/07/2010)
Sony's Alpha line is a redesigned and improved Minolta that uses the same lens mount. The A900 also shoots HD video, which is cool. That's your ticket, Arnie.
reply to this comment
Minolta Maxxum to DSLR (Arnie Colon — 04/09/2010)
Thank you for your reply to my query. Of course, the Sony A900 is the answer to any maiden's prayer, but hopelessly beyond my pauperish budget. The Pentax K-X is probably closer to reality. Take my Maxxum lenses down to my neighborhood Ritz and fiddle around? If you have any clues, or advice, given my embarrassing financial condition, please jump in!
reply to this comment
Nikon D70 or Canon EOS 50D (Lenny Sutsakhan — 03/29/2010)
I am comparing 2 DSLR, Nikon D90 and Canon EOS 50D. For the moment, it is a toss up as I am reading various reviews rating the performance of the two cameras.
I have an AF Nikkor - 85mm 1:1.8D. I am NOT sure whether this old lens type is compatible or can be utilized with Nikon D70. This could be a deciding factor if I can utilize this lens. I am welcoming your suggestions. Thank you, Lenny (3/28/10)
reply to this comment
I have an AF Nikkor - 85mm 1:1.8D. I am NOT sure whether this old lens type is compatible or can be utilized with Nikon D70. This could be a deciding factor if I can utilize this lens. I am welcoming your suggestions. Thank you, Lenny (3/28/10)
by James DeRuvo (03/30/2010)
Indeed it is, albeit on manual only probably. But that's the beauty of Nikon it's legacy of fantastic lenses that can still be used on new bodies. Stay in the family, I say.
reply to this comment
Roger (03/23/2010)
Will Speedlite 736AF/CAN flash work with Canon T2i camera?
reply to this comment
by James DeRuvo (03/24/2010)
Sure. I don't think you'll have too much trouble. Maybe some auto issues.
reply to this comment
Tina (04/23/2010)
hi, James, i am a technician in China, and i own my factory to produce video cameras, we hope to cooperate with you. www.china-msd.com
will you be interested in it? Henry and Tina
reply to this comment
will you be interested in it? Henry and Tina
Product Interest (Charles W Evans — 06/21/2010)
Good afternoon. I just read your comment on the "Digital Camera HQ" forum. I would be interested in what products you offer that I could review for our Magazine that would interest my readers.
Thank you,
Charles W Evans, Reviews Editor
HAL-PC Magazine, Inc.
3776 Harper, Suite 103
Houston, TX 77005-3622 USA
reviews@hal-pc.org
www.hal-pc.org
US voice: 1.713.663.7185
Int'l voice: 01+1.713.663.7185
reply to this comment
Thank you,
Charles W Evans, Reviews Editor
HAL-PC Magazine, Inc.
3776 Harper, Suite 103
Houston, TX 77005-3622 USA
reviews@hal-pc.org
www.hal-pc.org
US voice: 1.713.663.7185
Int'l voice: 01+1.713.663.7185
